BETA


2012/2711(RSP) Resolution on EU trade negotiations with Japan

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA KAZAK Metin (icon: ALDE ALDE) WAŁĘSA Jarosław (icon: PPE PPE), MOREIRA Vital (icon: S&D S&D), ANDERSDOTTER Amelia (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), KAMALL Syed (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2013/03/04
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2012/10/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2012/10/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on EU trade negotiations with Japan.

The economic and political context: Members feel it is crucial for the EU to deepen its economic and trade relationships with major global economies such as Japan in order to maximise jobs and growth potential and are concerned that the EU's bilateral trading volume with Japan is dramatically lower than with other partners such as the USA, China and Russia. Also recalling a study of 2009 estimating a potential increase of 71 % for EU exports to Japan, and an increase of 61 % for Japanese exports to the EU, if tariffs and non-tariff barriers were reduced to the fullest possible extent, Parliament concludes that the huge potential of the EU-Japanese commercial relationship has not yet been realised mainly due to the impact of Japanese non-tariff barriers on market access opportunities for European businesses. It believes that the EU should draw on its experience with the EU-South Korea FTA to achieve comparable market access penetration in negotiations with Japan.

The scoping exercise: noting the conclusion of the EU-Japan scoping exercise to the mutual satisfaction of the Commission and the Japanese Government, Parliament calls on the Japanese Government to reconfirm at the onset of formal negotiations of an EU-Japan FTA its commitments made in the scoping exercise, especially with regards to removing non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs) . As a condition for adopting negotiating directives for an FTA with Japan, the Council should insist on a binding review clause activated within one year of the launch of negotiations to assess whether Japan has delivered clear results in eliminating NTBs, in particular those affecting the EU's automotive sector, as well as the obstacles to public procurement for railways and urban transport agreed on in the scoping exercise.

A mandate for negotiations: Members call on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a free trade agreement with Japan on the basis of the outcome of the scoping exercise and clear targets. They call on the Commission to dedicate one of the initial negotiation rounds of the EU-Japan FTA to removing NTBs and, therefore, to ensuring that an independent impact assessment can be conducted as part of the review clause one year after the start of the negotiations to objectively assess the progress made on this key concern for Parliament.

Parliament makes a series of detailed recommendations on the Commission's negotiating directives, the main ones being:

measurable results from the Japanese Government on NTBs with a view to eliminating the large majority of barriers hindering EU-Japan trade . These commitments should go considerably further than the roadmaps already agreed under the scoping exercise; the Commission shall regularly report on progress in this area to the Council and Parliament; significant concessions on public procurement guaranteeing market access for European companies in strategic Japanese sectors including railways and urban transport and the same degree of openness as that of the EU's public procurement markets; eliminating existing NTBs in the automotive sector , noting that in 2011 the Japanese trade surplus with the European Union was worth EUR 18.5 billion, of which automotive products alone accounted for 30 %; a strict and effective dispute resolution mechanism requiring early consultations among the parties to combat the development of new NTBs and obstacles to market access in public procurement in Japan after the entry into force of the agreement; a staggered schedule for sensitive tariff reductions in the EU, (ii) effective bilateral safeguard measures, (iii) enforceable measures to protect Geographical Indications (GIs) for agricultural and foodstuff products, (iv) a robust sustainable development chapter with core labour standards, (v) the elimination of regulatory barriers particularly in investment, (vi) a heavy emphasis on energy cooperation and enhanced market access in environmental goods and services and (vii) the strengthening and extension of regulatory cooperation dialogues.

If these conditions are met, an EU-Japan FTA has the potential to lead to a win-win situation, beneficial for both economies, and that a deeper degree of integration through an economic integration agreement would multiply the gains considerably to both economies.

On the issue of whaling, Members note that serious divergences remain between the EU and Japan on issues related to the management of fisheries and whaling , notably Japan's whaling under the guise of scientific whaling, and they call for broader discussions on the matter of the abolition of whale hunting and of trade in whale products.

Beyond the negotiations: lastly, Members state that, if negotiations are successful, the Commission must undertake a second impact assessment to evaluate the expected advantages and disadvantages of the agreement for EU jobs and growth, including an analysis of the impact on sensitive sectors such as automotives and electronics, and the benefits for the EU's offensive interests.

Documents
2012/10/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/10/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2012/10/17
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2012/09/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/06/20
   EP - KAZAK Metin (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
93 2012/2711(RSP)
2012/09/20 INTA 93 amendments...
source: PE-496.448

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows
  • name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
  • name: MOREIRA Vital group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
  • name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
  • name: KAMALL Syed group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.448
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-496448_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0462_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0462_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121023&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-10-23-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2012-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0398_EN.html title: T7-0398/2012
summary
events/2
date
2012-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0398_EN.html title: T7-0398/2012
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KAZAK Metin date: 2012-06-20T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
associated
False
date
2012-06-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAZAK Metin group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-462&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0462_EN.html
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-398
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0398_EN.html
committees/0/shadows
  • name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
  • name: MOREIRA Vital group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
  • name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
  • name: KAMALL Syed group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
  • name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
activities
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121023&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22113&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-398 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0398/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
associated
False
date
2012-06-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAZAK Metin group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2012-06-20T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: KAZAK Metin
docs
  • date: 2012-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.448 title: PE496.448 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2012-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-462&language=EN title: B7-0462/2012 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=22113&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)72 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121023&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22113&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-398 title: T7-0398/2012 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on EU trade negotiations with Japan. The economic and political context: Members feel it is crucial for the EU to deepen its economic and trade relationships with major global economies such as Japan in order to maximise jobs and growth potential and are concerned that the EU's bilateral trading volume with Japan is dramatically lower than with other partners such as the USA, China and Russia. Also recalling a study of 2009 estimating a potential increase of 71 % for EU exports to Japan, and an increase of 61 % for Japanese exports to the EU, if tariffs and non-tariff barriers were reduced to the fullest possible extent, Parliament concludes that the huge potential of the EU-Japanese commercial relationship has not yet been realised mainly due to the impact of Japanese non-tariff barriers on market access opportunities for European businesses. It believes that the EU should draw on its experience with the EU-South Korea FTA to achieve comparable market access penetration in negotiations with Japan. The scoping exercise: noting the conclusion of the EU-Japan scoping exercise to the mutual satisfaction of the Commission and the Japanese Government, Parliament calls on the Japanese Government to reconfirm at the onset of formal negotiations of an EU-Japan FTA its commitments made in the scoping exercise, especially with regards to removing non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs) . As a condition for adopting negotiating directives for an FTA with Japan, the Council should insist on a binding review clause activated within one year of the launch of negotiations to assess whether Japan has delivered clear results in eliminating NTBs, in particular those affecting the EU's automotive sector, as well as the obstacles to public procurement for railways and urban transport agreed on in the scoping exercise. A mandate for negotiations: Members call on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a free trade agreement with Japan on the basis of the outcome of the scoping exercise and clear targets. They call on the Commission to dedicate one of the initial negotiation rounds of the EU-Japan FTA to removing NTBs and, therefore, to ensuring that an independent impact assessment can be conducted as part of the review clause one year after the start of the negotiations to objectively assess the progress made on this key concern for Parliament. Parliament makes a series of detailed recommendations on the Commission's negotiating directives, the main ones being: measurable results from the Japanese Government on NTBs with a view to eliminating the large majority of barriers hindering EU-Japan trade . These commitments should go considerably further than the roadmaps already agreed under the scoping exercise; the Commission shall regularly report on progress in this area to the Council and Parliament; significant concessions on public procurement guaranteeing market access for European companies in strategic Japanese sectors including railways and urban transport and the same degree of openness as that of the EU's public procurement markets; eliminating existing NTBs in the automotive sector , noting that in 2011 the Japanese trade surplus with the European Union was worth EUR 18.5 billion, of which automotive products alone accounted for 30 %; a strict and effective dispute resolution mechanism requiring early consultations among the parties to combat the development of new NTBs and obstacles to market access in public procurement in Japan after the entry into force of the agreement; a staggered schedule for sensitive tariff reductions in the EU, (ii) effective bilateral safeguard measures, (iii) enforceable measures to protect Geographical Indications (GIs) for agricultural and foodstuff products, (iv) a robust sustainable development chapter with core labour standards, (v) the elimination of regulatory barriers particularly in investment, (vi) a heavy emphasis on energy cooperation and enhanced market access in environmental goods and services and (vii) the strengthening and extension of regulatory cooperation dialogues. If these conditions are met, an EU-Japan FTA has the potential to lead to a win-win situation, beneficial for both economies, and that a deeper degree of integration through an economic integration agreement would multiply the gains considerably to both economies. On the issue of whaling, Members note that serious divergences remain between the EU and Japan on issues related to the management of fisheries and whaling , notably Japan's whaling under the guise of scientific whaling, and they call for broader discussions on the matter of the abolition of whale hunting and of trade in whale products. Beyond the negotiations: lastly, Members state that, if negotiations are successful, the Commission must undertake a second impact assessment to evaluate the expected advantages and disadvantages of the agreement for EU jobs and growth, including an analysis of the impact on sensitive sectors such as automotives and electronics, and the benefits for the EU's offensive interests.
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/7/09910
New
  • INTA/7/09910
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
New
6.20.03
Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
procedure/subtype
Old
Resolution on statements
New
Resolution on statement
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
4f1adc77b819f207b300011c
committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
WAŁĘSA Jarosław Leszek
New
WAŁĘSA Jarosław
activities/0
body
EP
date
2012-09-18T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/0/date
Old
2012-10-11T00:00:00
New
2012-10-23T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121023&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/0/type
Old
Prev Adopt in Cte
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/1
date
2012-09-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.448 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.448
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/1/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22113&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/1/docs/1/text
  • The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on EU trade negotiations with Japan.

    The economic and political context: Members feel it is crucial for the EU to deepen its economic and trade relationships with major global economies such as Japan in order to maximise jobs and growth potential and are concerned that the EU's bilateral trading volume with Japan is dramatically lower than with other partners such as the USA, China and Russia. Also recalling a study of 2009 estimating a potential increase of 71 % for EU exports to Japan, and an increase of 61 % for Japanese exports to the EU, if tariffs and non-tariff barriers were reduced to the fullest possible extent, Parliament concludes that the huge potential of the EU-Japanese commercial relationship has not yet been realised mainly due to the impact of Japanese non-tariff barriers on market access opportunities for European businesses. It believes that the EU should draw on its experience with the EU-South Korea FTA to achieve comparable market access penetration in negotiations with Japan.

    The scoping exercise: noting the conclusion of the EU-Japan scoping exercise to the mutual satisfaction of the Commission and the Japanese Government, Parliament calls on the Japanese Government to reconfirm at the onset of formal negotiations of an EU-Japan FTA its commitments made in the scoping exercise, especially with regards to removing non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs). As a condition for adopting negotiating directives for an FTA with Japan, the Council should insist on a binding review clause activated within one year of the launch of negotiations to assess whether Japan has delivered clear results in eliminating NTBs, in particular those affecting the EU's automotive sector, as well as the obstacles to public procurement for railways and urban transport agreed on in the scoping exercise.

    A mandate for negotiations: Members call on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a free trade agreement with Japan on the basis of the outcome of the scoping exercise and clear targets. They call on the Commission to dedicate one of the initial negotiation rounds of the EU-Japan FTA to removing NTBs and, therefore, to ensuring that an independent impact assessment can be conducted as part of the review clause one year after the start of the negotiations to objectively assess the progress made on this key concern for Parliament.

    Parliament makes a series of detailed recommendations on the Commission's negotiating directives, the main ones being:

    • measurable results from the Japanese Government on NTBs with a view to eliminating the large majority of barriers hindering EU-Japan trade. These commitments should go considerably further than the roadmaps already agreed under the scoping exercise; the Commission shall regularly report on progress in this area to the Council and Parliament;
    • significant concessions on public procurement guaranteeing market access for European companies in strategic Japanese sectors including railways and urban transport and the same degree of openness as that of the EU's public procurement markets;
    • eliminating existing NTBs in the automotive sector, noting that in 2011 the Japanese trade surplus with the European Union was worth EUR 18.5 billion, of which automotive products alone accounted for 30 %;
    • a strict and effective dispute resolution mechanism requiring early consultations among the parties to combat the development of new NTBs and obstacles to market access in public procurement in Japan after the entry into force of the agreement;
    • a staggered schedule for sensitive tariff reductions in the EU,  (ii) effective bilateral safeguard measures, (iii) enforceable measures to protect Geographical Indications (GIs) for agricultural and foodstuff products, (iv) a robust sustainable development chapter with core labour standards, (v) the elimination of regulatory barriers particularly in investment, (vi) a heavy emphasis on energy cooperation and enhanced market access in environmental goods and services and (vii) the strengthening and extension of regulatory cooperation dialogues.

    If these conditions are met, an EU-Japan FTA has the potential to lead to a win-win situation, beneficial for both economies, and that a deeper degree of integration through an economic integration agreement would multiply the gains considerably to both economies.

    On the issue of whaling, Members note that serious divergences remain between the EU and Japan on issues related to the management of fisheries and whaling, notably Japan's whaling under the guise of scientific whaling, and they call for broader discussions on the matter of the abolition of whale hunting and of trade in whale products.

    Beyond the negotiations: lastly, Members state that, if negotiations are successful, the Commission must undertake a second impact assessment to evaluate the expected advantages and disadvantages of the agreement for EU jobs and growth, including an analysis of the impact on sensitive sectors such as automotives and electronics, and the benefits for the EU's offensive interests.

activities/1/docs/1/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-398
activities/1/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/3
date
2012-10-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-462&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0462/2012
body
EP
type
Motion for a resolution
activities/4
date
2012-10-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/6
body
EC
date
2012-10-25T00:00:00
type
Prev DG PRES
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade Commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de185ed0fb8127435bdbfa8
New
4f1ac984b819f25efd00013e
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
4de1896b0fb8127435bdc49b
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de187020fb8127435bdc130
New
4f1ad9ceb819f207b3000038
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de185ea0fb8127435bdbfa4
New
4f1ac96db819f25efd000136
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386
New
4f1adb31b819f207b30000af
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
activities/5/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0398/2012
activities/5/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/title
Old
EU trade negotiations with Japan
New
Resolution on EU trade negotiations with Japan
activities/6/date
Old
2012-10-23T00:00:00
New
2012-10-25T00:00:00
activities/3
date
2012-10-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-462&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0462/2012
body
EP
type
Motion for a resolution
activities/4/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/2/type
Old
EP 1R Committee
New
Prev Adopt in Cte
activities/5
date
2012-10-25T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław Leszek group: S&D name: MOREIRA Vital group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2012-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ALDE name: KAZAK Metin
activities/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
EP 1R Committee
activities/2
date
2012-10-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław Leszek group: S&D name: MOREIRA Vital group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2012-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ALDE name: KAZAK Metin
committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
activities/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.448
activities
  • body: EP date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 type: Deadline Amendments
  • date: 2012-09-24T00:00:00 docs: type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.448 body: EP type: Amendments tabled in committee
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate scheduled
  • body: EC date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 type: Prev DG PRES commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade Commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław Leszek group: S&D name: MOREIRA Vital group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2012-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ALDE name: KAZAK Metin
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/7/09910
geographical_area
Japan
reference
2012/2711(RSP)
title
EU trade negotiations with Japan
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Resolution on statements
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subject
6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations