BETA


2012/2864(RSP) Resolution on judicial training - court coordinators

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI BERLINGUER Luigi (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2013/06/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/02/07
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/02/07
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution, tabled by the Committee on Legal Affairs, on judicial training - court coordinators.

Recalling that there can be no excuse for ignorance of European law on the part of national judges, the resolution notes that the increase in the number of Member States as well as the mounting burden on the European Court of Justice require: (i) that national courts facilitate speedy and effective access to justice, and (ii) cost-effective means of improving the training of judges and their access to the law must be found.

Parliament calls on the Commission to sponsor national court coordinators of European law and the interconnection of national networks of court coordinators . The main function of such a network would be to enable judges to confer readily in their day-to-day work with their counterparts in other Member States on such matters as the interpretation of particular words in the applicable European law in a secure digital environment (through a specially created social medium or via the e-justice portal). Members consider that these ‘circles of coherence’ would make for greater uniformity in the application of EU law while reducing the number of references for preliminary rulings.

Members also draw attention to the potential benefits for the economy in developing and exploiting e-learning and new technologies especially search engines.

To achieve mutual confidence, Parliament considers that the professional development of lawyers should emphasise the need for common standards of professional ethics, for the judiciary to be independent and impartial and for an approach to European regulation that is respectful of diversity.

Parliament goes on to suggest that the Commission organise a forum in the summer of 2013 – a ‘Congress of Messina for building a European judicial culture’ – at which judges can hold discussions on recent areas of legal controversy. Such a forum could afford a historic opportunity to discuss judicial training policy and the future of legal education in Europe.

Lastly, Parliament draws attention to its resolutions of 17 June 2010 and 14 March 2012 , and calls on the Commission to expedite the award of contracts under the pilot project on judicial training proposed by Parliament in 2011.

Documents
2013/02/07
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/02/06
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/02/04
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2013/01/31
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents
2012/11/06
   EP - BERLINGUER Luigi (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in JURI

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/0/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-02-06-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: BERLINGUER Luigi date: 2012-11-06T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2012-11-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: BERLINGUER Luigi
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0053_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0053_EN.html
events/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130206&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/2
date
2013-02-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0056_EN.html title: T7-0056/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-02-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0056_EN.html title: T7-0056/2013
summary
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-53&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0053_EN.html
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-56
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0056_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130206&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22576&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-56 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0056/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: REDING Viviane
docs
  • date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 docs: title: B7-0112/2013 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2013-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-53&language=EN title: B7-0053/2013 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2013-06-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=22576&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)304 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2013-02-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130206&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22576&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-56 title: T7-0056/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution, tabled by the Committee on Legal Affairs, on judicial training - court coordinators. Recalling that there can be no excuse for ignorance of European law on the part of national judges, the resolution notes that the increase in the number of Member States as well as the mounting burden on the European Court of Justice require: (i) that national courts facilitate speedy and effective access to justice, and (ii) cost-effective means of improving the training of judges and their access to the law must be found. Parliament calls on the Commission to sponsor national court coordinators of European law and the interconnection of national networks of court coordinators . The main function of such a network would be to enable judges to confer readily in their day-to-day work with their counterparts in other Member States on such matters as the interpretation of particular words in the applicable European law in a secure digital environment (through a specially created social medium or via the e-justice portal). Members consider that these ‘circles of coherence’ would make for greater uniformity in the application of EU law while reducing the number of references for preliminary rulings. Members also draw attention to the potential benefits for the economy in developing and exploiting e-learning and new technologies especially search engines. To achieve mutual confidence, Parliament considers that the professional development of lawyers should emphasise the need for common standards of professional ethics, for the judiciary to be independent and impartial and for an approach to European regulation that is respectful of diversity. Parliament goes on to suggest that the Commission organise a forum in the summer of 2013 – a ‘Congress of Messina for building a European judicial culture’ – at which judges can hold discussions on recent areas of legal controversy. Such a forum could afford a historic opportunity to discuss judicial training policy and the future of legal education in Europe. Lastly, Parliament draws attention to its resolutions of 17 June 2010 and 14 March 2012 , and calls on the Commission to expedite the award of contracts under the pilot project on judicial training proposed by Parliament in 2011.
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/7/11167
New
  • JURI/7/11167
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.40 Judicial cooperation
New
7.40
Judicial cooperation
procedure/subtype
Old
Debate or resolution on oral questions
New
Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
activities/0
date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
docs
type: Oral question by Parliament title: B7-0112/2013
body
EP
type
Oral question by Parliament
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130206&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/1
date
2013-02-04T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-53&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0053/2013
body
EP
type
Motion for a resolution
activities/1/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22576&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/1/docs/1/text
  • The European Parliament adopted a resolution, tabled by the Committee on Legal Affairs, on judicial training - court coordinators.

    Recalling that there can be no excuse for ignorance of European law on the part of national judges, the resolution notes that the increase in the number of Member States as well as the mounting burden on the European Court of Justice require: (i) that national courts facilitate speedy and effective access to justice, and (ii) cost-effective means of improving the training of judges and their access to the law must be found.

    Parliament calls on the Commission to sponsor national court coordinators of European law and the interconnection of national networks of court coordinators. The main function of such a network would be to enable judges to confer readily in their day-to-day work with their counterparts in other Member States on such matters as the interpretation of particular words in the applicable European law in a secure digital environment (through a specially created social medium or via the e-justice portal). Members consider that these ‘circles of coherence’ would make for greater uniformity in the application of EU law while reducing the number of references for preliminary rulings.

    Members also draw attention to the potential benefits for the economy in developing and exploiting e-learning and new technologies especially search engines.

    To achieve mutual confidence, Parliament considers that the professional development of lawyers should emphasise the need for common standards of professional ethics, for the judiciary to be independent and impartial and for an approach to European regulation that is respectful of diversity.

    Parliament goes on to suggest that the Commission organise a forum in the summer of 2013 – a ‘Congress of Messina for building a European judicial culture’ – at which judges can hold discussions on recent areas of legal controversy. Such a forum could afford a historic opportunity to discuss judicial training policy and the future of legal education in Europe.

    Lastly, Parliament draws attention to its resolutions of17 June 2010 and 14 March 2012, and calls on the Commission to expedite the award of contracts under the pilot project on judicial training proposed by Parliament in 2011.

activities/1/docs/1/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-56
activities/1/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1837a0fb8127435bdbc23
New
4f1ac659b819f25efd000034
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 115-p5
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
activities/3/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0056/2013
activities/3/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/title
Old
Judicial training - Court Coordinators
New
Resolution on judicial training - court coordinators
activities/1
date
2013-02-04T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-53&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0053/2013
body
EP
type
Motion for a resolution
activities/2/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/0
date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
docs
type: Oral question by Parliament title: B7-0112/2013
body
EP
type
Oral question by Parliament
activities
  • date: 2013-02-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate scheduled
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2012-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: BERLINGUER Luigi
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/7/11167
reference
2012/2864(RSP)
title
Judicial training - Court Coordinators
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 115-p5
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Debate or resolution on oral questions
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subject
7.40 Judicial cooperation