Activites

• 2016/04/12 Debate in plenary scheduled
• 2016/03/17 Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
  • A8-0056/2016 summary

    The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the recommendation for second reading contained in the report by Michael CRAMER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on railway safety (recast). As Council’s first reading position is in conformity with the agreement reached in the trilogues, the committee recommended accepting it without further amendment. The committee also took note of a Commission statement annexed to this resolution on explanatory documents. In this statement, the Commission recalled that the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission that the information Member States supply to the Commission as regards the transposition of directives in national law 'must be clear and precise' in order to facilitate the achievement by the Commission of its task overseeing the application of Union law. In the present case, explanatory documents could have been useful to this end. It regretted that the final text does not contain provisions to this effect.  At the end of informal negotiations between Parliament and Council, an agreement was reached. The main achievements of the European Parliament are as follows: the European Railway Agency (ERA) will play a key role in issuing safety certificates for railway undertakings: the ERA will be competent to issue safety certificates for railway undertakings operating in more than one Member State. Railway undertaking operating within one Member State can choose to be certified either by the ERA or a national safety authority; improved safety culture and occurrence reporting in railway undertakings and infrastructure managers: this will encourage staff to report occurrences under conditions of confidentiality and enable railway industry to learn lessons and to improve the work practices. Moreover, there will be training programmes for staff, including arrangements on the physical and psychological fitness; Member States will be obliged to monitor compliance of train drivers with rules on working, driving and rest periods; the ERA may establish a tool for exchange of information on safety risks among relevant actors. This will further facilitate cross-border exchange of information in case there is a safety risk, e.g. if the same type of rolling stock is used in more than one Member State; improve information policy towards relatives of victims and improved coordination of emergency services; the ERA will provide to investigative bodies with technical assistance and secretariat for cooperation of investigating bodies. Investigating bodies would do "peer reviews" with the aim to monitor their effectiveness and independence. However, since ERA issues authorisations, it can't be directly involved in investigation due to potential conflicts of interest.

• 2016/03/15 Vote in committee, 2nd reading
• 2016/02/04 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
• 2015/12/15 Council position published
  • 10580/1/2015 summary

    The Council adopted its position in first reading with a view to the adoption of the directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on railway safety (Recast) The proposal is part of the fourth railway package, which consists of six legislative proposals aimed at removing the remaining barriers to the completion of the Single European Railway Area. It aims to establish a common approach to safety in order to increase economies of scale for railway undertakings active across the Union, as well as to simplify and reform the administrative procedures for issuing safety certificates, thereby removing the fragmentation of rules across the Union. More specifically, the objective of the safety Directive is to: amend the existing regulatory framework in order to put in place the migration towards an EU single safety certificate for railway undertakings and infrastructure managers, to be issued by the European Railway Agency; clarify the roles and responsibilities of the various actors of the rail system in order to ensure adequate risk control at all levels. The main points in the Council position are as follows: Issuing of safety certificates: the Council position introduces more flexibility in the respective responsibilities of the national safety authorities and the Agency in the safety certification process, with additional safeguards granted to the national safety authorities in specific circumstances. The text sets up a dual system in relation to the issuing of safety certifications, where the Agency acts as a one-stop-shop through the setting-up of a new information and communications system for issuing safety certificates to railway undertakings involved in cross-border traffic, with national safety authorities keeping an important role in carrying out the assessments necessary to the issuing of certifications. For railway undertakings involved in national transport only, a choice exists to submit a request for certification either to the Agency or to the national safety authority. However, in both cases, the procedure and the decision criteria remain the same. Roles and responsibilities of the different actors in the safety chain: the text clarifies further the roles and responsibilities of the different actors of the rail system to improve the safety level, through the strengthening of the provisions on the respective role of the actors of the rail system in developing and improving railway safety. Infrastructure managers and railway undertakings should have a major responsibility for the safe operation of the train and they should be obliged to establish safety management systems. Cooperation agreements between the Agency and the national safety authorities: the Council proposes to put in place a new mechanism concerning the conclusion of cooperation agreements between the Agency and national safety authorities to facilitate the practical implementation of the new certification system. According to this mechanism, the cooperation agreements between the Agency and the national safety authorities may include specific cooperation arrangements in cases of networks requiring specific expertise due to geographical or historical reasons. Where such networks are isolated from the rest of the Union's rail system, such cooperation arrangements may include the possibility for contracting tasks to the relevant national safety authorities when it is necessary to ensure efficient and proportionate allocation of certification. National rules in the field of safety: the Council's position proposes the possibility of Member States: (i) maintaining national safety rules already notified under Directive 2004/49/EC in a number of cases; (ii) adopting new national rules in the field of safety. The text clarifies the procedures to be applied for the notification of national rules, as well as on the assessment to be made by the Agency (up to a period of 8 months). In addition, it provides that, when the Agency does not react within the required time limits, Member States will adopt the new national rules or the existing ones will remain valid. Supervision activities of the national safety authorities: the Council’s position aims at guaranteeing that the new safety certification procedure will not undermine the role of the national safety authorities in their supervision tasks. It also provides that, if during supervision, a national safety authority identifies a serious safety risk, it may apply temporary safety measures, on which the national authority would have the final say in case of disagreement with the Agency. Liability of the Agency: the Council's position aims to clarify the accountability of the Agency in the context of issuing safety certificates. A new recital recalls the legal framework of the Agency's liability, and underlines the importance of a full cooperation with Member States' authorities in case of railway accidents. Furthermore, the text provides that the Agency is fully responsible for the single safety certificate it issued. Appeal and arbitration procedure: the Council's text reflects the possibility given to the applicant of referring the matter to a national court in case of disagreement with the measure taken by the national safety authority. It also provides for an appeal procedure in case of a disagreement between the national safety authority and the Agency. Transitional provisions: Member States may continue to apply the existing provisions of Directive 2004/49/EC until three years after the date of entry into force of the Directive, and Member States may extend this period for an additional year. Safety culture and occurrence reporting: the Council's text covers the promotion of a culture of mutual trust, confidence and learning in which the staff of railway undertakings and infrastructure managers are encouraged to contribute to the development of safety. In addition, it provides for the possibility of reporting confidentially safety risks that are ignored. The Agency will be able to establish a tool that facilitates this exchange of information among the relevant actors. Delegated acts/implementing acts: the Council's text provides that the common safety targets (CSTs ) and common safety methods (CSMs) are adopted as an implementing act through the examination procedure, with the Committee of Member States being kept informed on the Agency’s works in a systematic and regular manner. Once the recommendation is delivered by the Agency, the Commission adopts the CSTs and CSMs as delegated acts.

• #3436
• 2015/12/14 Council Meeting
• 2014/10/13 Opening of interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
• #3318
• 2014/06/05 Council Meeting
• 2014/02/26 Results of vote in Parliament
  • Results of vote in Parliament
  • T7-0150/2014 summary

    The European Parliament adopted by 617 votes to 54 with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on railway safety (recast). The European Parliament’s position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows: Minimum provisions: the Directive lays down minimum provisions, beyond which Member States may legislate only in accordance with the rules. The aim would be to ensure the further improvement of safety of the Union's railways and improved access to the market for rail transport services by: ·        developing common safety targets and common safety methods with a view to greater harmonisation of national rules at a high safety level; ·        introducing a single safety certificate that is valid and recognised in all Member States within the specified areas of operation; ·        requiring the Agency to publish guidelines on railway safety and safety certification, including lists of examples of good practice, in particular for cross-border transport. According to the Parliament, safety should be ensured not only for passengers and employees, including the staff of contractors, but also for users of level crossings and persons residing near railway lines. Role of actors in the rail system: Members recommended that there be a clear distinction between tasks and responsibilities between the Agency and the national safety authorities. The Agency would become a one-stop shop for safety certificates in the Union, using the valuable expertise, local knowledge and experience of national safety authorities. It should have exclusive competence to issue, renew, amend or revoke safety certificates for both railway undertakings and infrastructure managers. Member States, the Agency and all actors of the rail system shall establish a 'just culture' that ensures the consistent reporting in confidence of accidents, incidents and potential safety risks. Member States should support the Agency in its work of monitoring the development of railway safety on a Union level. The Agency would set up and manage a centralised database containing all information submitted in relation to incidents and accidents. National rules: Member States would be able to draft new national rules after the entry into force of the Directive only in a certain number of cases. After receipt of the draft national rule, the Agency should initiate a coordination process involving all national safety authorities in order to ensure the highest possible degree of harmonisation across the Union. The new national rule may not remain in force or enter into force if the Commission, upon a recommendation of the Agency, objects to it, providing a statement of reasons for its objection. The Agency would establish and publish common guidelines for the adoption of new, or the amendment of existing, national rules. Safety management system: this would ensure the control of all risks associated with the activity of the infrastructure manager or railway undertaking, including proper qualification and training of staff, as well as the supply of maintenance and material and the use of contractors. The Commission shall establish, by means of delegated acts, elements of the safety management system, including an internally approved and communicated safety policy; qualitative and quantitative safety targets and procedures to reach those targets. For cross-border infrastructure, and in particular for cross-border tunnels, specific safety management systems would be developed and improved in order to ensure the necessary coordination and preparedness of the competent emergency services on both sides of the border. Infrastructure managers would also establish a system for coordination with managers in neighbouring countries with which the network is linked. Applications for single safety certificates: Members considered that the Agency should take a decision on an application without delay and in any event not more than three months after receipt of the application. Safety certificates for railway undertakings operating exclusively on an isolated network may also be granted by a national safety authority of those Member States which possess such a network. In such cases, the applicant may choose between applying to the Agency or to the national safety authorities of the Member States concerned. Maintenance of vehicles: the Agency should set up and make public, and subsequently update without delay, a register of certified entities in charge of maintenance. When drafting or amending TSIs, the Agency should harmonise rules on minimum maintenance requirements in order to ensure the safety of the entire rail system. No later than six months after this Directive comes into force, the Agency shall identify railway components that are critical for railway safety and shall develop a system that enables those components to be traced. National safety authority: the amended text provided for the possibility of Member States also deciding to jointly establish a safety authority competent for their territories. The tasks of the national safety agency would include: ·        monitoring compliance with working, driving and rest time rules for locomotive drivers in the railway companies and on the track; ·        monitoring compliance with applicable rules on the safe maintenance and operation of rail freight wagons and other rolling stock; ·        drawing up a general emergency plan for the rail network covering, in particular: (i) channels for communicating with victims' families following a serious accident; (ii) a system for providing care for victims following an accident, which will guide them in the complaints procedures. Transition period: until four years after the date of entry into force, the national safety authorities may continue to grant safety certificates in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2004/49/EC. The deadline for transposition and the entry into force of the Directive was brought forward from two years to one year.

• 2014/02/25 Debate in Parliament
  • Debate in Parliament
• 2014/01/09 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • A7-0015/2014 summary

    The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Michael CRAMER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on railway safety (recast). The parliamentary committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should be to amend the Commission’s proposal as follows: Minimum provisions: the Directive would lay down minimum provisions, beyond which Member States may legislate only in accordance with the rules, to ensure the development and further improvement of safety of the Union's railways and improved access to the market for rail transport services by: developing common safety targets and common safety methods with a view to greater harmonisation of national rules at a high safety level; introducing a single safety certificate that is valid and recognised in all Member States within the specified areas of operation; requiring the Agency to publish guidelines on railway safety and safety certification, including lists of examples of good practice, in particular for cross-border transport. According to the report, safety should be ensured not only for passengers and employees, including the staff of contractors, but also for users of level crossings and persons residing near railway lines. Role of actors in the rail system: Members recommended that there be a clear distinction between tasks and responsibilities between the Agency and the national safety authorities. The Agency would become a one-stop shop for safety certificates in the Union, using the valuable expertise, local knowledge and experience of national safety authorities. It should have exclusive competence to issue, renew, amend or revoke safety certificates for both railway undertakings and infrastructure managers. Member States, the Agency and all actors of the rail system shall establish a 'just culture' that ensures the consistent reporting of accidents, incidents and potential safety risks. Member States should support the Agency in its work of monitoring the development of railway safety on a Union level. The Agency would set up and manage a centralised database containing all information submitted in relation to incidents and accidents. National rules: Member States would be able to draft new national rules after the entry into force of the Directive only in a certain number of cases. After receipt of the draft national rule, the Agency should initiate a coordination process involving all national safety authorities in order to ensure the highest possible degree of harmonisation across the Union. The Agency would establish and publish common guidelines for the adoption of new, or the amendment of existing, national rules. Safety management system: this would ensure the control of all risks associated with the activity of the infrastructure manager or railway undertaking, including proper qualification and training of staff, as well as the supply of maintenance and material and the use of contractors. For cross-border infrastructure, and in particular for cross-border tunnels, specific safety management systems would be developed and improved in order to ensure the necessary coordination and preparedness of the competent emergency services on both sides of the border. Infrastructure managers would also establish a system for coordination with managers in neighbouring countries with which the network is linked. Applications for single safety certificates: Members considered that the Agency should take a decision on an application without delay and in any event not more than three months after receipt of the application. Maintenance of vehicles: the Agency should set up and make public, and subsequently update without delay, a register of certified entities in charge of maintenance. When drafting or amending TSIs, the Agency should harmonise rules on minimum maintenance requirements in order to ensure the safety of the entire rail system. National safety authority: the amended text provided for the possibility of Member States also deciding to jointly establish a safety authority competent for their territories. The tasks of the national safety agency would include: monitoring compliance with working, driving and rest time rules for locomotive drivers in the railway companies and on the track; monitoring compliance with applicable rules on the safe maintenance and operation of rail freight wagons and other rolling stock; drawing up a general emergency plan for the rail network covering, in particular: (i) channels for communicating with victims' families following a serious accident; (ii) a system for providing care for victims following an accident, which will guide them in the complaints procedures. Transition period: Members recommended a time limit of 1 year after entry into force of the Directive Contractual is defined for the establishment of arrangements that define the scope, procedures and hierarchy of cooperation between the Agency and the national safety authorities. The deadline for transposition and the entry into force of the Directive was brought forward from two years to one year.

• 2013/12/17 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
• #3261
• 2013/10/10 Council Meeting
  • 3261
• 2013/02/07 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 2013/01/30 Legislative proposal published
  • COM(2013)0031 summary

    PURPOSE: to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of the Single European Railway Area in the field of safety (fourth railway package). PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (amendment of Directive 2004/49/EC on railway safety). PARLIAMENT’S ROLE: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: in the last decade, the EU railway market has witnessed profound changes, gradually introduced by three legislative ‘railway packages’ intended to open up the national markets and make railways more competitive and interoperable at the EU level, while maintaining high level of safety. However, the modal share of rail in intra-EU transport has remained modest. This is why the Commission has put forward the Fourth Railway Package in order to enhance the quality and efficiency of rail services by removing the remaining market obstacles. This proposal for a Directive, along with the proposal to recast Directive 2008/57/EC on interoperability, are part of this fourth package which focuses on the removal of remaining administrative and technical barriers by: establishing a common approach to safety and interoperability rules to increase economies of scale for railway undertakings active across the EU; decreasing administrative costs, accelerating administrative procedures, as well as avoiding disguised discrimination, relying on the European Railways Agency. In order to pursue efforts to establish a single market for rail transport services, it is necessary to establish a common regulatory framework for railway safety. Member States have until now developed their safety rules and standards mainly on national lines. Differences in principles, approach and culture have made it difficult to break through the technical barriers and establish international transport operations. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission undertook an impact assessment. In order to support the Commission in the impact assessment process, an external consultant was tasked to prepare an impact assessment support study and to undertake a targeted consultation of stakeholders. LEGAL BASIS: Article 91 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. CONTENT: the Commission is proposing to amend the current regulatory framework with a view to: facilitating the creation and implementation of a single EU safety certificate, in accordance with the recommendation of the European Railways Agency. Access to the railway infrastructure would only be granted to railway undertakings holding a safety certificate. In this regard, the proposal introduces amendments designed to take into account the new role of the national safety agencies in the transition process towards a single safety certificate and the reallocation of responsibilities between them and the Agency. adapting the text to take into account developments in the rail market: the current trend of outsourcing activities or services is leading to the emergence of new actors subject to increasing economic and financial pressure, while internal control is decreasing. This may have consequences for safety, unless a new way of monitoring is established, through contractual or other arrangements, to ensure that risk control measures are duly implemented by all relevant actors. Other proposed changes include: adapting the scope and definitions to improve consistency with the Interoperability Directive; adapting the provision regarding national rules to take into account the evolution of the legal framework (adoption of technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs)), in accordance with the conclusions of the Task Force established for the purpose; clarifying the cooperation between the national investigation body and the judicial authorities in case of investigation following an accident. It should be noted that the fourth railway package also includes: (i) a proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail and (ii) a proposal amending Directive 2012/34/EU establishing a single European railway area. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: there are no implications for the Union budget. DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.   

  • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm', 'title': 'Mobility and Transport'}, BULC Violeta

Documents

• Legislative proposal published: COM(2013)0031
• Debate in Council: 3261
• Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0015/2014
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0150/2014
• Council position published: 10580/1/2015
• Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A8-0056/2016

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)