Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | LEICHTFRIED Jörg ( S&D) | FERBER Markus ( PPE), VAN DALEN Peter ( ECR), MEISSNER Gesine ( ALDE), TAYLOR Keith ( Verts/ALE), LUNDGREN Peter ( EFDD) |
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | LEICHTFRIED Jörg ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and their energy efficiency, while continuing to improve road safety.
LEGISLATIVE ACT : Directive (EU) 2015/719 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic
CONTENT: The main objective of the Directive is to make HGVs and buses greener and safer by authorising weights and dimensions which exceed current limits in certain cases and under determined conditions, where improvements were not feasible with the limitations set out by the Directive 96/53/EC in its previous version.
Improve aerodynamism : the Directive makes provision for granting derogations on vehicle length so as to allow rear flaps to be attached to the vehicle or the front of the vehicle to be redesigned to create a more aerodynamic shape. It aims to allow the installation of such devices as soon as the necessary amendments to the technical requirements for type approval of the aerodynamic devices are transposed or applied and the Commission has adopted implementing acts laying down the operational rules for the use of such devices.
In the same way, in order to improve the aerodynamic performance of cabs, maximum lengths of lorries may be exceeded provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency and safety performance.
Aerodynamic devices exceeding 500 mm in length and motor vehicles equipped with cabs that improve their aerodynamic performance, where such vehicles exceed the limits set by Directive 96/53/EC, are to be type approved before being placed on the market.
Clean fuels : the Directive promotes the use of clean fuels by authorising a weight increase of one tonne for alternatively fuelled vehicles, to take account of the weight required for the alternative fuel technology.
Containerisation and facilitating intermodal transport operat ions: in the area of containerisation, 45-foot containers are increasingly being used. Such containers are transported by all modes of transport. The Directive provides for:
an increase of 15cm for vehicles engaged in the transport of 45-foot containers that are part of an intermodal transport operation; the circulation of three-axle motor vehicles with two- or three-axle semi-trailers will be allowed up to a total authorised weight of 44 tonnes ; two-axle motor vehicles with three-axle semi-trailers transporting containers or swap bodies of a length of up to 45 feet will be allowed in intermodal transport operations up to a total authorised weight of 42 tonnes.
Buses: the Directive authorises an additional tonne for buses, in order to take account of the increase in the weight of passengers and their luggage.
Provisions regarding application : Member States should, by 27 May 2021, take specific measures to identify vehicles or vehicle combinations in circulation that are likely to have exceeded the relevant weight limits and that should therefore be checked. Such identification may be carried out by means of weighing mechanisms built into the road infrastructure, or by means of on-board sensors in vehicles that communicate data remotely to the relevant authorities.
Every year, each Member State should perform an appropriate number of vehicle weight checks that should be proportionate to the total number of vehicles inspected each year in the Member State concerned.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26.5.2015.
TRANSPOSITION: 7.5.2017.
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopted delegated acts in order to update the list of alternative fuels included in the Directive in light of the latest technological developments. The power to adopt such acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of five years (which may be tacitly extended) from 26 May 2016. The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections to a delegated act within two months of the date of notification of that act (which period may be extended for two months). If Parliament or Council raise objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.
The Commission accepts all the amendments to the position adopted by the Council and voted upon by the European Parliament in second reading.
The text is the result of negotiations between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. Its objective is to make HGVs and buses greener and safer by authorising weights and dimensions which exceed current limits in certain cases and under determined conditions, where improvements are currently not feasible with the limitations set out by the Directive in its current version.
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the Council position at first reading with view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
Parliament’s position adopted at second reading of the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Council’s position as follows:
Intermodal transport operation : the definition should cover:
· the combined transport operations defined in Article 1 of Council Directive 92/106/EEC engaged in the transport of one or more containers or swap bodies, up to a total maximum length of 45 feet, or;
· transport operations engaged in the transport of one or more containers or swap bodies, up to a total maximum length of 45 feet, using waterborne transport, provided that the length of the initial or the final road leg does not exceed 150 km in the territory of the Union.
Aerodynamic devices : improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would allow significant gains in respect of the energy performance of vehicles. Parliament stipulated that the aerodynamic devices shall fulfil the following operational conditions :
· in circumstances where the safety of other road users or of the driver is at risk, they shall be folded, retracted or removed by the driver;
· their use on urban and inter urban road infrastructures shall take into account the special characteristics of areas where the speed limit is less than or equal to 50 km/h and where vulnerable road users are more likely to be present; and
· their use shall be compatible with intermodal transport operations and, in particular, when retracted/folded, they shall not exceed the maximum authorised length by more than 20 cm.
On-board weighing equipment : this shall be accurate and reliable, fully interoperable and compatible with all vehicle types.
One year after the date of entry into force of the Directive, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts, laying down detailed provisions ensuring uniform conditions for the implementation of the rules on interoperability and compatibility.
In order to ensure compatibility with all vehicle types, on-board systems of motor vehicles shall have the capability to receive and process any data coming from any type of trailer or semi-trailer attached to the motor vehicle.
Infringements in relation to overloaded vehicles : these need to be addressed adequately by Member States in order to avoid any distortions of competition and to ensure road safety.
Review : the Commission shall review the Directive 3 years after national rules are in place, taking into consideration certain market segments. On the basis of that report, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the recommendation for second reading contained in the report by Jörg LEICHTFRIED (S&D, AT), on the Council position at first reading with view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament should amend the Council’s position in first reading as follows:
Intermodal transport operation : the definition should cover:
the combined transport operations defined in Article 1 of Council Directive 92/106/EEC engaged in the transport of one or more containers or swap bodies, up to a total maximum length of 45 feet, or transport operations engaged in the transport of one or more containers or swap bodies, up to a total maximum length of 45 feet, using waterborne transport, provided that the length of the initial or the final road leg does not exceed 150 km in the territory of the Union.
Aerodynamic devices: these shall fulfil the following operational conditions:
· in circumstances where the safety of other road users or of the driver is at risk, they shall be folded, retracted or removed by the driver;
· their use on urban and inter urban road infrastructures shall take into account the special characteristics of areas where the speed limit is less than or equal to 50 km/h and where vulnerable road users are more likely to be present; and
· their use shall be compatible with intermodal transport operations and, in particular, when retracted/folded, they shall not exceed the maximum authorised length by more than 20 cm.
On-board weighing equipment : this shall be accurate and reliable, fully interoperable and compatible with all vehicle types.
One year after the date of entry into force of the Directive, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts, laying down detailed provisions ensuring uniform conditions for the implementation of the rules on interoperability and compatibility.
In order to ensure compatibility with all vehicle types, on-board systems of motor vehicles shall have the capability to receive and process any data coming from any type of trailer or semi-trailer attached to the motor vehicle.
Review : the Commission should review the Directive 3 years after national rules are in place, taking into consideration certain market segments such as car transporters. Any legislative proposal must be duly accompanied by an impact assessment.
The Commission considered that the Council position supports the main objectives of the Commission proposal of enabling the design of greener and safer trucks, while deviating on some other aspects, in particular:
considerable timeframes are proposed both for the transposition of the new Directive (3 years) and for the implementation of the provisions of its Article 9 on the design of new cabs (5 years after the necessary modification of Directive 2007/46, including its implementing acts), in order to accommodate the capacity of investment of some vehicle manufacturers. In the Commission proposal, a transposition period of 18 months was provided for; the enforcement pillar proposed by the Commission to sanction infringements of overweight, has largely been rejected by the Council which deleted Article 13 on categorisation of infringements and watered down Article 12 on enforcement. The Council however agreed that Member States have to report to the Commission on the number of checks and infringements; implementing powers of the Commission (comitology), the Council invokes Article 5, paragraph 4, second subparagraph, point (b) of Regulation 182/2011 ("no opinion-clause"). The Commission made a statement recalling that recourse to this provision must not be made systematically but must be interpreted in a restrictive manner and thus must be justified.
On the other hand, the Commission welcomes the following points:
measures on aerodynamic features have kept the drafting proposed by the Commission in terms of both objective and content. Despite the fact that the Council replaces the proposed delegated acts by implementing acts, the Commission can agree to this approach; the introduction of joint liability between shipper and haulier for the transport of containers; the adoption of a new definition of the intermodal transport operation which appropriately addresses the specificity of waterborne transport; the fact that the Council has increased to 19.5 tonnes the weight allowed for 2-axle buses (500 kg more than the weight set forward in the Commission proposal).
With regard to cross-border traffic of longer vehicles , the Commission takes note of the diverging opinions between Member States, and of the decision of the Council not to modify the text of the current Directive.
For these reasons, the Commission considers that it would be contrary to the interests of the Union citizens to wait for a number of years before manufacturers introduce the new designs, which are, to a large extent, ready for deployment. The Commission is of the view that those issues deserve to be addressed during the negotiations between the co-legislators.
The Council adopted its position at first reading on the proposed Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic. The objective of this legislative initiative is to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and their energy efficiency while continuing to improve road safety and remaining within the limits imposed by the geometry of road infrastructures.
The Council’s approach has been to introduce several amendments to the original proposal. The main provisions of the Directive have been significantly amended . The Council's position at first reading, therefore, amends the original Commission proposal by redrafting it and adding and deleting several provisions of the text. This means that the Council cannot accept the amendments introduced by the European Parliament’s opinion at first reading in relation to those provisions.
The key policy issues are as follows:
Clarification on the cross-border traffic of longer vehicles : although the Commission proposes to modify the Directive 96/53/EC, the Council takes the view that Directive 96/53/EC provides the appropriate balance between the right of Member States to explore and determine transport solutions appropriate to their local circumstances, and the need to avoid distortions to the internal market and significant impact on international competition. Council and Parliament have similar views on this issue.
Alternative fuels : in the same spirit of the Commission's proposal, the Council decided on an approach promoting the use of alternatively fuelled vehicles . The list of alternative fuels that can already benefit from the additional weight required for the use of alternative fuels (maximum of 1 tonne) may be updated by the Commission taking account of technological progress.
The European Parliament's approach is similar to the Council's approach on low-carbon technologies. Parliament’s amendments were taken on board partially or in spirit.
Combined vs. intermodal transport : the Council shares the view that the use of intermodal transport as proposed in the context of the revision of Directive 96/53/EC will favour transport by short sea shipping, by inland waterways as well as by rail, compared to the use of combined transport as defined in Directive 92/106/EEC. Therefore, the Council included a definition of intermodal transport operation in the text for the purposes of this Directive.
Moreover, the text provides for a derogation of 15 cm to the maximum length and the maximum distance between the axis of the fifth wheel and the rear of a semi-trailer for vehicles transporting 45-foot containers in the context of an intermodal transport operation.
The Council did not follow the European Parliament who proposed to keep the definition of combined transport throughout the text and called upon the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to amend Directive 92/106/EEC.
Aerodynamic devices at the rear of the vehicle and new cab design : in order to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and, consequently, save fuel, the Council's text allows for derogations to the maximum authorised lengths for vehicles or combinations of vehicles , if:
the vehicle or vehicle combination is equipped with aerodynamic devices at the rear; the vehicle or vehicle combination is equipped with a cab that provides improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency and improved safety.
The Council clarifies that aerodynamic devices must:
meet certain requirements to ensure safety in general and safety of intermodal transport operations; be used in accordance with certain operational requirements that will be adopted by the Commission (implementing acts), and must comply with the provisions of the type-approval Directive (Directive 2007/46/EC).
The Council decided to invite the Commission to develop the necessary technical requirements for the type-approval of vehicles equipped with new cabs , under the type-approval Directive (2007/46/EC). Before being put on the market, those vehicles must be approved in accordance with that Directive.
In the Council's text, the requirements for vehicles equipped with new cabs are not mandatory . The European Parliament envisages mandatory requirements seven years after the entry into force of this Directive.
The Council’s position provides that vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices or with new cabs must be able to turn within a swept circle having an outer radius of 12.50 m and an inner radius of 5.30 m .
Moreover, the possibility given to exceed the maximum lengths for vehicles must not lead to an increase in the load capacity of those vehicles. Parliament’s amendment was taken on board in spirit.
The European Parliament maintains the delegation of power to the Commission as envisaged in the Commission's proposal. Since the Council decided on another approach, the Parliament’s amendments were not taken into consideration.
Enforcement : according to the Council's position on enforcement:
Member States must take specific measures to identify vehicles exceeding the authorised maximum weight six years from the date of entry into force of this Directive; checks on vehicle weight may be performed with the aid of automatic systems set up on the infrastructure or by means of onboard weighing equipment; Member States must not impose the installation of onboard weighing systems in vehicles registered in another Member State; detailed technical specifications shall be established by implementing acts to ensure that onboard weighing systems are accurate, reliable and fully interoperable.
The Council could not follow the Commission's approach in terms of categorisation of the infringements. The text was replaced by the obligation for Member States to lay down rules on penalties applicable to the infringements envisaged in the Directive .
Reporting obligations : the Council streamlined the reporting obligations initially proposed by the Commission on the number of checks carried out in the previous two calendar years and the number of overloaded vehicles detected.
Transposition date : the Council provides for a transitional regime of 36 months ; the one initially envisaged by the Commission was 18 months.
Delegated acts/implementing acts : the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts to update, for the purposes of this Directive, the list of alternative fuels referred to in the Directive that require additional weight. However, the Council decided to modify the delegation of power to the Commission (replacing delegated acts with implementing acts) for rear flaps, new cabin design and establishment of the technical specifications for interoperability.
The Council adopted its position at first reading on the proposed Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic. The objective of this legislative initiative is to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and their energy efficiency while continuing to improve road safety and remaining within the limits imposed by the geometry of road infrastructures.
The Council’s approach has been to introduce several amendments to the original proposal. The main provisions of the Directive have been significantly amended . The Council's position at first reading, therefore, amends the original Commission proposal by redrafting it and adding and deleting several provisions of the text. This means that the Council cannot accept the amendments introduced by the European Parliament’s opinion at first reading in relation to those provisions.
The key policy issues are as follows:
Clarification on the cross-border traffic of longer vehicles : although the Commission proposes to modify the Directive 96/53/EC, the Council takes the view that Directive 96/53/EC provides the appropriate balance between the right of Member States to explore and determine transport solutions appropriate to their local circumstances, and the need to avoid distortions to the internal market and significant impact on international competition. Council and Parliament have similar views on this issue.
Alternative fuels : in the same spirit of the Commission's proposal, the Council decided on an approach promoting the use of alternatively fuelled vehicles . The list of alternative fuels that can already benefit from the additional weight required for the use of alternative fuels (maximum of 1 tonne) may be updated by the Commission taking account of technological progress.
The European Parliament's approach is similar to the Council's approach on low-carbon technologies. Parliament’s amendments were taken on board partially or in spirit.
Combined vs. intermodal transport : the Council shares the view that the use of intermodal transport as proposed in the context of the revision of Directive 96/53/EC will favour transport by short sea shipping, by inland waterways as well as by rail, compared to the use of combined transport as defined in Directive 92/106/EEC. Therefore, the Council included a definition of intermodal transport operation in the text for the purposes of this Directive.
Moreover, the text provides for a derogation of 15 cm to the maximum length and the maximum distance between the axis of the fifth wheel and the rear of a semi-trailer for vehicles transporting 45-foot containers in the context of an intermodal transport operation.
The Council did not follow the European Parliament who proposed to keep the definition of combined transport throughout the text and called upon the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to amend Directive 92/106/EEC.
Aerodynamic devices at the rear of the vehicle and new cab design : in order to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and, consequently, save fuel, the Council's text allows for derogations to the maximum authorised lengths for vehicles or combinations of vehicles , if:
the vehicle or vehicle combination is equipped with aerodynamic devices at the rear; the vehicle or vehicle combination is equipped with a cab that provides improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency and improved safety.
The Council clarifies that aerodynamic devices must:
meet certain requirements to ensure safety in general and safety of intermodal transport operations; be used in accordance with certain operational requirements that will be adopted by the Commission (implementing acts), and must comply with the provisions of the type-approval Directive (Directive 2007/46/EC).
The Council decided to invite the Commission to develop the necessary technical requirements for the type-approval of vehicles equipped with new cabs , under the type-approval Directive (2007/46/EC). Before being put on the market, those vehicles must be approved in accordance with that Directive.
In the Council's text, the requirements for vehicles equipped with new cabs are not mandatory . The European Parliament envisages mandatory requirements seven years after the entry into force of this Directive.
The Council’s position provides that vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices or with new cabs must be able to turn within a swept circle having an outer radius of 12.50 m and an inner radius of 5.30 m .
Moreover, the possibility given to exceed the maximum lengths for vehicles must not lead to an increase in the load capacity of those vehicles. Parliament’s amendment was taken on board in spirit.
The European Parliament maintains the delegation of power to the Commission as envisaged in the Commission's proposal. Since the Council decided on another approach, the Parliament’s amendments were not taken into consideration.
Enforcement : according to the Council's position on enforcement:
Member States must take specific measures to identify vehicles exceeding the authorised maximum weight six years from the date of entry into force of this Directive; checks on vehicle weight may be performed with the aid of automatic systems set up on the infrastructure or by means of onboard weighing equipment; Member States must not impose the installation of onboard weighing systems in vehicles registered in another Member State; detailed technical specifications shall be established by implementing acts to ensure that onboard weighing systems are accurate, reliable and fully interoperable.
The Council could not follow the Commission's approach in terms of categorisation of the infringements. The text was replaced by the obligation for Member States to lay down rules on penalties applicable to the infringements envisaged in the Directive .
Reporting obligations : the Council streamlined the reporting obligations initially proposed by the Commission on the number of checks carried out in the previous two calendar years and the number of overloaded vehicles detected.
Transposition date : the Council provides for a transitional regime of 36 months ; the one initially envisaged by the Commission was 18 months.
Delegated acts/implementing acts : the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts to update, for the purposes of this Directive, the list of alternative fuels referred to in the Directive that require additional weight. However, the Council decided to modify the delegation of power to the Commission (replacing delegated acts with implementing acts) for rear flaps, new cabin design and establishment of the technical specifications for interoperability.
The European Parliament adopted by 606 votes to 54 with 12 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Definitio ns: Parliament deleted the definition of ‘electric vehicle’ and inserted the term ‘ low carbon technology’ , being technology which did not fully rely on fossil oil sources in the energy supply to transport and which significantly contributed to the decarbonisation of transport. The sources included: (i) electricity, (ii) hydrogen, (iii) synthetic fuels, (iv) advanced Biofuels, (v) natural gas, including biomethane, in gaseous form (compressed natural gas – CNG) and liquefied form (liquefied natural gas – LNG), and (vi) waste heat.
Parliament specified that vehicles equipped with low-carbon technologies should be permitted to exceed the maximum weight by up to one tonne , depending on the weight required for the technology. However, the extra weight should not increase the load capacity of the vehicle. The principle of technological neutrality should be maintained.
Improve aerodynamic performance of vehicles : heavy-good vehicles were responsible for about 26 % of road transport CO2 emissions in Europe while their fuel efficiency had hardly improved over the last 20 years.
With the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance, Parliament stated that vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with devices that met the relevant criteria may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I by up to 500 mm.
Amongst the criteria referred to above were the following:
· secure attachment of the devices in such a way as to ensure that there is no risk of their detachment;
· day and night markings in accordance with type-approval rules on the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices;
· a design which does not reduce the driver’s visibility of the rear of the vehicle.
The exceedances of maximum lengths must allow the construction of tractor cabs improving the aerodynamic characteristics of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, and improving road safety for vulnerable road users and vehicles involved in rear-end collisions.
The requirements for cabs must allow:
· improvement of direct vision to make vulnerable road users more visible to the driver, in particular by reducing the blind spots under the front windscreen and all around the cab, and, where necessary, by fitting additional equipment, such as mirrors and camera systems;
· reduction of the damage in the event of a collision with other vehicles and improves the energy absorption performance by fitting of an energy absorbing crash management system;
· improving pedestrian protection by adjusting the frontal design to minimise the risk of overruns in case of collisions with vulnerable road users by encouraging the sideways diversion of vulnerable users.
The requirements for the comfort and safety of drivers to which drivers’ cabs must conform were:
· compliance with the requirements set out in the Occupational Health and Safety Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, with its hierarchy of prevention measure for the elimination of sources of whole-body vibration and of musculoskeletal disorders;
· the provision of the driver’s cab with safety features starting with a secure fire exit of the cab;
· the increase in size of the driver’s cab to adapt to comfort and safety requirements for driver’s seats and couchettes taking into account emergency situations.
Within seven years of the entry into force of the Directive new N2 and N3 vehicles and combination of vehicles shall use cabs that comply with the safety requirements referred to in the directive.
Facilitate intermodal transport : by 2017, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal to amend Directive 92/106/EEC and, in particular, the existing definition of combined transport, in order to take into account the development of containerisation and in view of facilitating the development of efficient intermodal transport.
Infringements and checks : Member States shall ensure that the information concerning the number and severity of any infringements of the Directive that an individual undertaking had committed was introduced into the risk rating system established under Directive 2006/22/EC.
When identifying vehicles to be subject to checks, Members States may select as a priority vehicles operated by undertakings with a high-risk profile . Vehicles may also be selected randomly for checks.
Classification of infringements depending on their seriousness : the amended text stated that:
· an overload of less than 2 % of the maximum authorised weight shall give rise to a written warning to the transport company, which could give rise to a penalty, if the national legislation provides for this type of penalty ;
· an overload of between 2 % and 10 % of the maximum authorised weight shall be considered as a minor offence and shall give rise to a penalty ;
· an overload of between 10 and 15 % of the maximum authorised weight shall be considered a serious infringement and give rise to a penalty and the immediate immobilisation of the vehicle for unloading until it reaches the maximum authorised weight,
· an overload of more than 15 % of the maximum authorised weight shall be considered a very serious infringement and give rise to an immediate immobilisation of the vehicle for unloading until it reaches the maximum authorised weight, and to a penalty.
Report: by 2016, the Commission shall review Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC and submit a report on its implementation to the European Parliament and the Council. On the basis of this report, it shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment. Following the review of the directive, the Commission shall submit a proposal by 1 January 2017, to mandate the safety requirements for all new M2 and M3 vehicles.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Jörg LEICHTFRIED (S&D, AT) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
The committee recommended that Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission position as follows:
Definitions: Members deleted the definition of ‘electric vehicle’ and inserted the term ‘ low carbon technology’ , being technology which does not fully rely on fossil oil sources in the energy supply to transport and which significantly contribute to the decarbonisation of transport. The sources include: (i) electricity, (ii) hydrogen, (iii) synthetic fuels, (iv) advanced Biofuels, (v) natural gas, including biomethane, in gaseous form (compressed natural gas – CNG) and liquefied form (liquefied natural gas – LNG), and (vi) waste heat.
The report specified that vehicles equipped with low-carbon technologies should be permitted to exceed the maximum weight by up to one tonne , depending on the weight required for the technology. However, the extra weight should not increase the load capacity of the vehicle. The principle of technological neutrality should be maintained.
Improve aerodynamic performance of vehicles : with the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance, vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with devices that meet the relevant criteria may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I by up to 500 mm.
Amongst the criteria referred to above were the following:
· secure attachment of the devices in such a way as to ensure that there is no risk of their detachment;
· day and night markings in accordance with type-approval rules on the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices;
· a design which does not reduce the driver’s visibility of the rear of the vehicle.
The exceedances of maximum lengths must allow the construction of tractor cabs improving the aerodynamic characteristics of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, and improving road safety for vulnerable road users and vehicles involved in rear-end collisions.
The requirements for cabs must allow:
· improvement of direct vision to make vulnerable road users more visible to the driver, in particular by reducing the blind spots under the front windscreen and all around the cab, and, where necessary, by fitting additional equipment, such as mirrors and camera systems;
· reduction of the damage in the event of a collision with other vehicles and improves the energy absorption performance by fitting of an energy absorbing crash management system;
· improving pedestrian protection by adjusting the frontal design to minimise the risk of overruns in case of collisions with vulnerable road users by encouraging the sideways diversion of vulnerable users.
The requirements for the comfort and safety of drivers to which drivers’ cabs must conform were:
· compliance with the requirements set out in the Occupational Health and Safety Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, with its hierarchy of prevention measure for the elimination of sources of whole-body vibration and of musculoskeletal disorders;
· the provision of the driver’s cab with safety features starting with a secure fire exit of the cab;
· the increase in size of the driver’s cab to adapt to comfort and safety requirements for driver’s seats and couchettes taking into account emergency situations.
Within seven years of the entry into force of the Directive new N2 and N3 vehicles and combination of vehicles shall use cabs that comply with the safety requirements referred to in the directive.
Facilitate intermodal transport : by 2017, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal to amend Directive 92/106/EEC and, in particular, the existing definition of combined transport, in order to take into account the development of containerisation and in view of facilitating the development of efficient intermodal transport.
Infringements and checks : Member States shall ensure that the information concerning the number and severity of any infringements of the Directive that an individual undertaking had committed was introduced into the risk rating system established under Directive 2006/22/EC.
When identifying vehicles to be subject to checks, Members States may select as a priority vehicles operated by undertakings with a high-risk profile . Vehicles may also be selected randomly for checks.
Report: the Commission should review Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC and report on its implementation, taking into account, inter alia, impacts on international competition, modal split, costs of infrastructure adaption and the environmental and safety objectives of the European Union as set in the 2011 White Paper on Transport.
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 96/53/EC on the maximum authorised weights in road traffic vehicles, with the aim of reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, so as to adapt the legislation to technological developments and changing market needs and to facilitate intermodal transport.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (amendment of Council Directive 96/53/EC).
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: it has become crucial to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of petroleum products in the field of transport , and even more crucial for road transport, which accounts for 82% of the energy consumption of the transport sector. Furthermore, the steady rise in the price of fuel prompts the need to identify solutions to reduce vehicle fuel consumption. In the light of the evolving market and the technologies available, the question today is whether the choices made when the Directive was adopted in 1996 are still relevant.
The White Paper on Transport Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system published in 2011 set a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 60% by 2050 in comparison with 1990 levels. In this context, the White Paper announced the revision of the 1996 Directive, with the aim of allowing more energy- efficient, aerodynamic vehicles to be put on the market.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposed measures are the result of public and sectoral consultations held in 2011 and 2012 and organized by the Commission. They were examined in an impact assessment which looked at several options in terms of economic and environmental efficiency.
The option selected combines technical harmonisation work conducted with a group of experts with a view to adopting delegated acts and a moderate regulatory approach, in order to avoid imposing disproportionate or inapplicable obligations, which would penalise small and medium-sized enterprises in particular.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 91 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the Commission proposes to amend Directive 96/53/EC to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and their energy efficiency, while continuing to improve road safety, and within the limits imposed by the geometry of road infrastructures. Specifically, the proposal:
grants derogations from the maximum dimensions of vehicles for the addition of aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles or to redefine the geometry of the cabs for tractors, improving drivers’ field of vision, and improving their safety and comfort. The Commission will, with the assistance of a Committee, specify these requirements at a later stage; authorises a weight increase of one tonne for vehicles with an electric or hybrid propulsion , to take account of the weight of batteries or the dual motorisation, without prejudice to the load capacity of the vehicle. Furthermore, the maximum weight of buses will be increased by a tonne to take account of various developments such as the increase in the average weight of passengers and their baggage, of new equipment imposed by the safety regulations, and the new Euro VI class; will facilitate the development of intermodal transport by allowing a derogation of 15 cm in the length of trucks carrying 45-foot containers, which are increasingly used in intercontinental and European transport; confirms that cross-border use of longer vehicles is lawful for journeys that only cross one border, if the two Member States concerned already allow it and if the conditions for derogations under the Directive are met; adds new provisions to enable the inspection authorities to better detect infringements and harmonise administrative penalties that apply to them . The Commission will publish guidelines on inspection procedures to ensure harmonisation of inspection methods between all Member States. The latter must carry out a minimum number of vehicle checks, using either weighing systems built into the road or by means of onboard sensors in vehicles that communicate remotely with roadside inspectors. The Commission will define the technical standards for onboard weighing devices that can communicate with the inspection authorities.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
In order to accelerate the introduction of vehicles that are more aerodynamic and have hybrid motorisation, the Commission will use the budgets at its disposal, in particular those allocated to trans-European networks and the EU programmes for research, development and innovation, to help industrial research, and equipping vehicle fleets.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SWD(2023)0070
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2015/719
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 115 06.05.2015, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32015L0719R(04)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 277 27.10.2022, p. 0314
- Draft final act: 00002/2015/LEX
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(2015)0169
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: EUR-Lex
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T8-0046/2015
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A8-0032/2015
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at early 2nd reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE612.105
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE546.895
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2015)0007
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE544.397
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2017)009171
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE612.105
- Council position: 11296/3/2014
- Council position published: 11296/3/2014
- Council statement on its position: 14074/2014
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)471
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0353/2014
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0256/2014
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE524.694
- Committee draft report: PE521.689
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4581/2013
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2013)0108
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2013)0109
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2013)0195
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0108
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0109
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4581/2013
- Committee draft report: PE521.689
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE524.694
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)471
- Council statement on its position: 14074/2014
- Council position: 11296/3/2014
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2017)009171
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE612.105
- Committee draft report: PE544.397
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2015)0007 EUR-Lex
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE546.895
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(2015)0169 EUR-Lex
- Draft final act: 00002/2015/LEX
- Follow-up document: SWD(2023)0070
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
- Contribution: COM(2013)0195
Activities
- Jacqueline FOSTER
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
- Lucy ANDERSON
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (A8-0032/2015 - Jörg Leichtfried) FR
- Philippe DE BACKER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Wim van de CAMP
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Michel DANTIN
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
- Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Notis MARIAS
- Jens NILSSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Keith TAYLOR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bendt BENDTSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore CICU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michael CRAMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Spyros DANELLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian DUNCAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo ECHENIQUE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Inácio FARIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrico GASBARRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo IGLESIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Constance LE GRIP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eva LICHTENBERGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alessia Maria MOSCA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renaud MUSELIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianni PITTELLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav POCHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sofia RIBEIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matteo SALVINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renato SORU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Helga STEVENS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard SULÍK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ángela VALLINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0256/2014 - Jörg Leichtfried - Am 22S #
A7-0256/2014 - Jörg Leichtfried - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
326 |
2013/0105(COD)
2013/12/10
TRAN
317 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Using alternative engines that no longer
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by 15 cm could eliminate these administrative procedures for transporters and facilitate intermodal transport, without risk or prejudice to the infrastructure or other road users. The small increase that this 15 cm represents in relation to the length of an articulated truck (16.50 m) does not constitute an additional risk to road safety. In the policy orientation of the White Paper on Transport, this
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by 15 cm could eliminate these administrative procedures for transporters and facilitate intermodal transport, without risk or prejudice to the infrastructure or other road users. The small increase that this 15 cm represents in relation to the length of an articulated truck (16.50 m) does not constitute an additional risk to road safety. In the policy orientation of the White Paper on Transport, this increase is however authorised only for intermodal transport, for which the road component does not exceed
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by 15 cm could eliminate these administrative procedures for transporters and facilitate intermodal transport, without risk or prejudice to the infrastructure or other road users. The small increase that this 15 cm represents in relation to the length of an articulated truck (16.50 m) does not constitute an additional risk to road safety. In the policy orientation of the White Paper on Transport, this increase is however authorised only for intermodal transport, for which the road component does not exceed 300 km or 50% for operations involving a rail, river or sea component. This distance appeared sufficient to link an industrial or commercial site with a freight terminal or a river port. To link a seaport and support the development of motorways of the sea, a longer distance is possible for a short intra- European maritime transport operation.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by 15 cm could eliminate these administrative procedures for transporters and facilitate intermodal transport, without risk or prejudice to the infrastructure or other road users. The small increase that this 15 cm represents in relation to the length of an articulated truck (16.50 m) does not constitute an additional risk to road safety. In the policy orientation of the White Paper on Transport, this increase is however authorised only for intermodal transport, for which the road component does not exceed 300 km for operations involving a rail, river or sea component. This distance appeared sufficient to link an industrial or commercial site with a freight terminal or a river port. Taking into account the specific circumstances of island member states, to link a seaport and support the development of motorways of the sea, a longer distance is possible for a short intra-
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) To further promote intermodal transport, a
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Since the adoption of Directive
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The authorities responsible for enforcing road transport-related requirements note a high number of infringements, sometimes serious, particularly in relation to the weight of transport vehicles. This situation stems from the insufficient number of checks conducted under Directive 96/53/EC, or from their inefficiency. Furthermore, the procedures and rules for checks differ between Member States, creating legal uncertainty for drivers of vehicles operating in several Member States of the Union. Furthermore, transporters that do not comply with the relevant rules enjoy a significant competitive advantage over competitors that do comply with the rules, and over other modes of transport. This situation constitutes an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market and a risk to road safety. It is therefore important that Member States increase the pace and efficiency of checks carried out, both the manual checks and the pre- selections for manual checks
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The authorities responsible for enforcing road transport-related requirements note a high number of infringements, sometimes serious, particularly in relation to the weight of transport vehicles.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Simple technological solutions, fixed or mobile, are now available that allow inspectors to preselect vehicles suspected of infringements without stopping the vehicles in question, which is less disadvantageous in terms of traffic flow, less onerous and allows optimal safety conditions. Some devices may be installed onboard heavy goods vehicles and give the driver a way of checking whether his or her vehicle is compliant with the law. These onboard devices may also use a microwave communication interface to communicate their data to officials or to roadside automatic inspection systems without stopping the vehicle. The pre-selection should
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Simple technological solutions, fixed or mobile, are now available that allow inspectors to preselect vehicles suspected of infringements without stopping the vehicles in question, which is less disadvantageous in terms of traffic flow, less onerous and allows optimal safety conditions. Some devices may be installed onboard heavy goods vehicles and give the driver a way of checking whether his or her vehicle is compliant with the law. These onboard devices may also use a microwave communication interface to communicate their data to officials or to roadside automatic inspection systems without stopping the vehicle.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Simple technological solutions, fixed or mobile, are now available that allow inspectors to preselect vehicles suspected of infringements without stopping the vehicles in question, which is less disadvantageous in terms of traffic flow, less onerous and allows optimal safety conditions. Some devices may be installed onboard heavy goods vehicles and give the driver a way of checking whether his or her vehicle is compliant with the law. These onboard devices
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Simple technological solutions, fixed or mobile, are now available that allow inspectors to preselect vehicles suspected of infringements without stopping the vehicles in question, which is less disadvantageous in terms of traffic flow, less onerous and allows optimal safety conditions.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) The observation of a high number of
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) The observation of a high number of infringements of the provisions of Directive
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) The inspection authorities in the Member States must be able to exchange information to make checking the weight of vehicles or vehicle combinations more effective at international level, and to facilitate the smooth operation of these checks, in particular the identification of offenders, the description of offences and penalties applied, and the state of good repute of the undertaking concerned.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) The European Parliament and the Council should be regularly informed of the checks on road traffic carried out by the Member States. This information, provided by the Member States through their contact point, will enable the Commission to ensure compliance with this Directive by hauliers and to define whether or not additional coercive measures should be developed.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) The European Parliament and the Council should be
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to define the requirements imposed on new aerodynamic
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to define the requirements imposed on new aerodynamic devices placed in the rear of the vehicle or the design of new motor vehicles, as well as the technical specifications to ensure full interoperability of onboard weighing devices, and guidelines on the procedures for checking the weight of vehicles in circulation. It is particularly important that the Commission
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 a (new) (18a) Should any change be made to the weights and measurements provided for in this Regulation, this should be done in a harmonised manner and a time frame provided for their entry into force, to enable businesses to renew their vehicle fleet without giving rise to distortions of competition in the market.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Directive
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Directive
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1 Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – subparagraph 1 – ‘
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 2 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 - ‘low carbon technology’ means an innovative technology where the CO2 savings can be demonstrated
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 3 Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 3 Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – ‘intermodal
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 3 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 12 a (new) Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 3 b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 12 b (new) - ‘combined transport’ means the transport of goods between member states where the lorry, trailer, semi-trailer, with or without tractor unit, swap body or container of 20 feet or more uses the road on the initial or final leg of the journey and, on the other leg, rail or inland waterway or maritime services where this section exceeds 100 km and make the initial or final road transport leg of the journey; - between the point where the goods are loaded and the nearest suitable rail loading station for the initial leg, and between the nearest suitable rail unloading station and the point where the goods are unloaded for the final leg, or; - within a radius not exceeding 150 km from the inland waterway port or seaport of loading or unloading.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 3 b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 12 b (new) - Combined transport means the transport of goods where the lorry, trailer, semi- trailer, with or without tractor unit, swap body or container uses the road on the initial and final leg of the journey and, on the other leg, rail or inland waterway or maritime services where this section exceeds 100 km and makes the initial and final road transport leg of the journey: - Between the point where the goods are loaded and the nearest suitable rail loading station for the initial leg, and between the nearest suitable rail unloading station and the point where the goods are unloaded for the final leg, or - Within a radius not exceeding 150 km from the inland waterway port or seaport of loading or unloading.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) (2) In Article 4
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) (2) In Article 4
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) 2)
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) In Article 4
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 (2) Article 4 is amended as follows: Member States may nonetheless, under strict conditions and subject to checks, allow the circulation on their territory of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the national transport of goods freight which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in points 1.3, 2, 3 and 4.3 of Annex I. Member States that do not allow the use on their territory of such vehicles or vehicle combinations not in conformity with the characteristics set out in points 1.3, 2, 3 and 4.3 of Annex I may also prohibit the circulation of non- national commercial vehicles.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) (2) In Article 4
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 2 (a) The word ‘national’ is deleted from points (a) and (b) of paragraph
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 (a) The word ‘national’ is deleted from point
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) (a) The following paragraph 2a shall be inserted: (aa) ‘Member States shall permit road vehicles, including combination vehicles, which do not comply with the specifications contained in points 1.3, 2, 3, 4.1 and/or 4.3 of Annex I to be used for a cross-border operation between neighbouring Member States which have adopted measures in application of this paragraph;’
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (aa) The first phrase of Article 4(4) is replaced by the following phrase: `Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for goods transport which carry out certain transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territories with weights and dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1, 2, and 4 of Annex 1.´
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (b)
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4– paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Transport operations shall be considered
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Transport operations shall be considered to not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector if they take place on the territory of a Member State or, for a cross-border operation, between only two neighbouring Member States who have both adopted measures taken in application of this paragraph, and if one of the conditions under (a) and (b) is fulfilled
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Transport operations shall be considered to not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector if they take place on the territory of a Member State or, for a cross-border operation, between
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Transport operations shall be considered to
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 ‘Transport operations shall be considered to not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector if they take place on the territory of a Member State or, for a cross-border operation, between
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Transport operations shall be considered to not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector if they take place on the territory of a Member State or, for a cross-border operation, between only two neighbouring Member States who have both adopted measures taken in application of this paragraph, and if one of the conditions under (a) and (b) is fulfilled
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Transport operations shall be considered to not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector and the environmental and safety objectives of the European Union if they take place on the territory of a Member State or, for a cross- border operation, between only two neighbouring Member States
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 7 a (new) (ba) The following paragraph is added to article 4: (7a) No later than [three years from the date of publication of this Directive], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of article 4 and 4a (new). The report shall assess if the provisions under article 4 contradict the safety and environmental objectives of the Union and if article 4a (new) needs to be adapted in line with new technological developments. The report shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal if appropriate.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 7 b (new) (bb) The following paragraph is added to article 4 : 7b. Two neighbouring Member States may authorise vehicles or vehicle combinations used for goods transport to circulate in their territory for a cross- border operation, with dimensions exceeding those laid down in point 1.3 of Annex 1, provided that their use is notified to the European Commission before the adoption of this Directive.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 (ba) Article 4(5) is replaced by the following: ‘(5) Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with one or more requirements of this Directive to be used for a trial period subject to the following conditions: - the transport operations in question shall be confined to strictly designated local areas within the territory of the Member State in question; - the duration of the trial shall be limited to 24 months; - the trial shall be scientifically monitored and the trial vehicles’ impact shall be studied in relation to the following aspects: infrastructure, road safety, modal shift, compatibility with existing combined transport provision, the environment, drivers’ working conditions and public acceptance; - an official report on the conduct of the trial and the findings of the scientific monitoring shall be submitted to the Commission annually; - the Commission shall publish these reports. Member States shall give the Commission advance notice of trials that they intend to conduct. The Commission shall ensure that the trials are permissible having regard to the conditions outlined above. The Commission shall refuse to allow trials which are incompatible with this Directive or with the rules of international competition. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament of its decisions in this regard.’
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (ba) The following paragraph is added to Article 4: (3a) Commission should come up with a proposal for a harmonised approach for procedures for issuing special permits by competent authorities in different member states and/or regions allowing indivisible loads to circulate.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new) (2a) The following Article 4(5a) shall be inserted: (5a) ‘Member States may permit cross- border transport by vehicles, including combination vehicles, which do not comply with the specifications contained in points 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Annex, provided that Member States do not discriminate among the Member States where the vehicles concerned are registered. Member States shall designate the sections of the road network on which these vehicles or combination vehicles are permitted. This information shall be publicly accessible.’
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) 2 a) In Article 4 – paragraph 4 – the following subparagraph is inserted after the second subparagraph: Without prejudice to Member States’ rights laid down in acts on accession to the union, international transport operations carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations with dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1,1.2, 1.4 to 1.8, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex 1 shall be prohibited.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 (2a) Article 4(5) is replaced by the following: (5) Member States shall be encouraged to allow vehicles and vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with one or more requirements of this Directive to carry out certain local transport operations for a trial period. Member States shall inform the Commission thereof.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) (2a) In Article 4(4), the following subparagraph is inserted after the second subparagraph: 'Without prejudice to Member States' rights laid down in Acts on Accession to the Union, international transport by vehicles or vehicle combinations of a length, and weight in excess of 44 tonnes, not in conformity with the dimensions laid down in Annex I to this Directive shall be prohibited.'
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 (2b) The first paragraph of Article 4(4) of Directive 96/53/EC is amended as follows: "4. Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.4 to 1.8, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I."
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 3) Article 4(6)
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 3) Article 4(6)
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) (3a) The following paragraph 4 (6a) is added to Article 4: (6a) The Commission shall be empowered, in the light of information received pursuant to Article 4(5), to require for the approval in principle of such vehicles specifications that confer a road safety or environmental benefit.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 (4a) The following is added to Article 4.5 of the directive: In order to establish these trial periods, following conditions need to be fulfilled: - the trial period shall not be longer than 5 years, - the transport operations shall take place in a local, well-defined area of the territory of the Member State, - the trial needs to be officially monitored taking into account impacts on infrastructure, road safety, modal split and environment, - an official report of the monitoring results of the trial should be sent to the Commission and made publicly available.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 7 a (new) (5a) The following paragraph 7a. is added to Article 4: 7a. Neighbouring Member States that on a permanent basis since Directive 96/53/EC entered into force allow road transport of goods with vehicles or vehicle combinations with weights and/or dimensions deviating from Annex 1 as provided in Article 4.1 a) and 4.2 a) and, as regards dimensions, in compliance with Article 4 (4) with the addition, as regards cross boarder operations, of deviations from Annex 1 point 1.3, may allow cross boarder operations between them with such vehicles and combinations. Such Member States and neighbouring Member States where longer, heavier or higher vehicles are provisionally allowed may likewise allow cross boarder operations between them on mutual agreement. The Member States will notify the Commission on this procedure.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 7 b (new) (5b) The following paragraph 7b) is added to Article 4: 7b. This procedure of Member States allowing the crossborder operations with heavier, longer and/or higher vehicles with mutual agreement and Commission notification procedure will be re- evaluated 5 years after this directive comes to effect.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 a (new) Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 With the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with such devices
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 With the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance of vehicles or combinations of vehicles and optimising other parts or elements of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with devices that meet the criteria set out below may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I. The only purpose of these exceedances is to allow the addition to the rear of vehicles or
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 With the aim of improving road safety and the aerodynamic performance of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with devices that meet the criteria set out below may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I. The only purpose of these exceedances is to allow the addition to the rear of vehicles or vehicle combinations of devices increasing their aerodynamic characteristics.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) In the interests of improved road safety, aerodynamic cowls and underrun protective devices affixed on the sides and at the rear of vehicles and trailers should be made of energy-absorbent materials that significantly reduce the impact on other road-users in the event of an accident.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The Commission shall develop and propose a harmonised testing regime to maximise the safety impacts of new truck fronts, sides and the rear for pedestrians and cyclists.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part The performance and safety requirements to be
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part The performance and safety requirements to be
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 in terms of road safety
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 in terms of road safety
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point i secure attachment of the devices in such a way as to
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii day and night markings in accordance with type-approval rules on the installation of lighting and light- signalling devices, effective even in poor weather conditions, that allow
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii day and night markings, effective even in poor weather conditions, that allows other road users to gauge the external bodywork of the vehicle and its bulk outline,
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii a (new) (iia) A design which does not reduce the driver’s visibility of the rear of the vehicle. In order to increase visibility, it could be made conditional on the presence of additional systems to compensate lack of visibility, such as cameras, sensors, mirrors, etc;
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point iii Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point iv a (new) (iva) the length of the device shall not exceed the 500 mm limit stipulated in point 1.1 of Annex I.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 – point ii Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 – point iii these devices can be
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 – point iii Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 – last sentence The exceedances of the maximum length shall
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 Before being put on the market, the additional aerodynamic devices and their installation on vehicles shall be authorised by the Member States
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 Before being put on the market, the additional aerodynamic devices and their installation on vehicles shall be authorised by the Member States, which shall issue a certificate to this effect, attesting compliance with the requirements mentioned in paragraph 2 above and
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. New N2 and N3 vehicles shall use tractor cabs that comply with the safety requirements referred to in Article 9 (2) from ten years from entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16, to complement the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. These shall be implemented within the Type Approval framework of Directive 2007/46 and take the form of technical characteristics, minimum levels of performance, design constraints, and procedures for the establishment of the test certificate referred to in paragraph 3.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16, to complement the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. These shall take the form of technical characteristics, minimum levels of performance, design constraints, and procedures for the establishment of the test certificate referred to in paragraph 3. Given the inevitable interaction between rear underrun protection and aerodynamic systems, the Commission shall at the same time be empowered to adapt the technical characteristics, minimum levels of performance etc. for underrun protective devices to the new circumstances.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16, to complement the requirements
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 Pending the adoption of the delegated acts, the vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices to the
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 Pending the adoption of the delegated acts, the vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices to the rear, which meet the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 and were tested in accordance with paragraph 3 may circulate if their length exceeds the length laid down in Annex I, point 1.1 by no more than two metres. The loading area thus created may be used for additional load volume without increasing the permissible overall mass of the commercial vehicle. This transitional measure shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 Pending the adoption of the delegated acts, the vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices to the rear, which meet the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 and were tested in accordance with paragraph 3 may circulate if their length exceeds the length laid down in Annex I, point 1.1 by no more than two metres. Member States shall accept the use of vehicles equipped with such devices within their territories unless they have reasonable grounds to believe the technical provisions against which the device was issued are not equivalent to their own. This transitional measure shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Pending the adoption of the delegated acts, the vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices to the rear, which meet the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 and were tested in accordance with paragraph 3 may circulate if their length exceeds the length laid down in Annex I, point 1.1 by no more than two metres. This transitional measure shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Directive. Specialised vehicles, such as vehicle transporters, which by their inherent and open design cannot benefit from aerodynamic devices to the rear, may use these additional two metres to optimise their efficiency by other means such as optimal loading with the use of front- and rear-overhangs.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 Pending the adoption of the delegated acts, the vehicles or combinations of vehicles equipped with aerodynamic devices to the rear, which meet the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 and were tested in accordance with paragraph 3 may circulate if their length exceeds the length laid down in Annex I, point 1.1 by no more than two metres. This transitional measure shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Directive. Specialised vehicles, such as vehicle transporters, which by their inherent design cannot benefit from an aerodynamic devices to the front nor rear, may use these additional two metres to optimise their efficiency by other means such as optimal loading with the use of front- and rear-overhangs. The tractor cab shall in any case comply with the requirements set up in article 9.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the road safety and aerodynamic
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving road safety and the aerodynamic performance
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance and road safety of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles that meet the criteria set out in paragraph 2 below may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I. The main purpose of these exceedances is to allow the construction of
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance and road safety of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles that meet the criteria set out in paragraph 2 below may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I. The main purpose of these exceedances is to allow the construction of tractor cabs improving the aerodynamic characteristics of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, and improving road safety for vulnerable road users and vehicles involved in rear-end collisions.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance and road safety of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles that meet the criteria set out in paragraph 2 below may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I. The main purpose of these exceedances is to allow the construction of
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance and road safety of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles that meet the
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the aerodynamic performance and road safety of vehicles or combinations of vehicles, vehicles or combinations of vehicles that meet the criteria set out in paragraph 2 below may exceed the maximum lengths provided for in point 1.1 of Annex I. The
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 In the aim of improving the
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 improved
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point i makes vulnerable road users more visible to the driver,
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point i improves direct vision to make
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point i makes vulnerable road users more visible to the driver, in particular by reducing the blind spot under the front windscreen, extending side windows, especially down to floor level, fitting additional mirrors and installing camera systems wherever necessary to make vulnerable road users more visible and wherever no visibility is provided by windows or mirrors, particularly at the rear of the vehicle
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii reduces the damage in the event of a collision
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii reduces the damage in the event of a collision by improving the energy absorption performance of cabs,
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – point ii a (new) (iia) Improving pedestrian protection by adjusting the frontal design to minimise the risk of overruns in case of collisions with vulnerable road users
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 4 - the comfort and safety of the drivers with a view to improving workplace conditions.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – last sentence The exceedance
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – indent 4 the comfort, health and safety of the drivers.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 Before they are put on the market
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 Before they are put on the market, the aerodynamic performance of new motor vehicle designs shall be tested by Member States, who will issue a certificate to this end. Th
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (3a) With regard to the admissibility of exceeding maximum length limits as a result of aerodynamic adjustments in accordance with Articles 8 and 9, a general inspection of the vehicle or vehicle combination shall also be carried out to ensure that the total excess length is not significantly detrimental to traffic safety and traffic flow, especially in the light of specified infrastructural parameters.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/537ec Article 9 –paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The safety requirements referred to in article 9.2 and the cabin design requirements referred to in article 9a (new) shall become mandatory for all new N2 and N3 vehicles from 1st January 2020.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) New vehicles shall use tractor cabs that comply with the safety requirements referred to in Article 9(2) from [10 years from the entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 4 Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 4 The requirements set out in paragraph 2 are adopted in accordance with paragraph 5 below. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the requirements which the new tractor cabs must meet in accordance with Article 16. These take the form of technical characteristics, minimum levels of performance, design constraints, and procedures for the establishment of the test certificate indicating the increase in aerodynamic performance referred to in paragraph 3. The Commission shall adopt the aforementioned delegated acts no later than one year after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the requirements which the new
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the requirements which the new
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 4 No later than one year from the date of publication of this Directive, The Commission shall
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 The requirements set out in paragraph 2 are adopted in accordance with paragraph 5 below. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the requirements which the new tractor cabs must meet in accordance with Article 16. These take the form of technical characteristics, minimum levels of performance, design constraints, and procedures for the establishment of the test certificate indicating the increase in aerodynamic performance referred to in paragraph 3. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult the interested parties (builders, drivers, road safety associations, traffic authorities, training centres, etc) and shall publish a report on the results of the consultation.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 5 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the requirements which the new tractor cabs
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 a (new) (7a) The following Article 9 a is added: Article 9 a The safety requirements referred to in article 9.2 shall become mandatory for all new N2 and N3 vehicles from 1 January 2016.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 a (new) Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 a (new) (7a) Article 9a is added: Article 9 a With the aim of improving the driver’s safety and comfort, and ultimately to ensure the improvement of road safety of the vehicles in the scope of this directive, the safety and comfort requirements to be met by the driver’s cabins are as follows: - Compliance with the requirements set out in the Occupational Health and Safety Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, with its hierarchy of prevention measure for the elimination of sources of whole-body vibration and of musculoskeletal disorders; - The provision of the driver’s cabin with safety features starting with a secure fire exit of the cabin; - The increase in size of the driver’s cabin to adapt to comfort and safety requirements for driver’s seats and couchettes taking into account emergency situations.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 The maximum weights of vehicles with
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 The maximum weights of
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 The maximum weights of vehicles
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 The vehicles with
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 The vehicles
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a a (new) New N2 and N3 vehicles shall comply with the safety requirements referred to in article 9.2 from the 1st of January 2020 onwards.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a b (new) By the end of 2018, the Commission shall review this directive in order to analyse the impacts of cross-border use of vehicles or vehicles combinations exceeding the maximum dimensions laid down by Annex I. The impact assessment of the Commission shall analyse the impacts on road safety, on the modal shift, the consequences on the infrastructure and on the environment. On the basis of the results of this impact assessment, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal to amend the directive.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first part The maximum dimensions laid down in Annex I points 1.1 and 1.6 may be exceeded by 15 cm for vehicles or combinations of vehicles engaged in the
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first part T
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first part The maximum dimensions laid down in
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first part The maximum dimensions laid down in Annex I points 1.1 and 1.6 may be exceeded by
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first part The maximum dimensions laid down in Annex I points 1.1 and 1.6 may be exceeded by
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first part The maximum dimensions laid down in Annex I points 1.1 and 1.6 may be exceeded by 15 cm and points 1.2 (a) by 5 cm for vehicles or combinations of vehicles engaged in the transport of 45-foot containers, 45 foot pallet wide containers or swap bodies, if the road transport of the container or swap body is part of an intermodal transport operation.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey. Each of these road
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey. Each of these road sections shall be less than
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal or combined transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey. Each of these road sections shall be less than
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river and/or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey. Each of these road sections shall be less than 300 km in the territory of the European Union or just as far as the closest terminals between which there is a regular service. A transport operation shall also be regarded as intermodal transport if it uses
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey. Each of these road sections shall be less than 300 km in the territory of the European Union or just as far as the closest terminals between which there is a regular service. A transport operation shall also be regarded as intermodal transport if it uses intra- European short sea shipping, regardless of the lengths of the initial and terminal road journeys, to ensure a level-playing field between Member states. The initial road journey and the terminal road journey for an operation using intra-European short sea shipping takes place from the point where the goods are loaded to the nearest appropriate seaport for the initial leg, and/or where appropriate between the nearest appropriate seaport and the point where the goods are unloaded for the final leg.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – second part For the purposes of this Article, and of point 2.2.2(c) of Annex I, an intermodal transport operation shall include at least rail, river or sea transport at least. It shall also include a road section for its initial and/or terminal journey.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Member States shall establish a system for pre-selecting and targeting checks on vehicles or combinations of vehicles in circulation, without discriminating on the basis of the nationality of drivers or transport entrepreneurs, in order to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Directive.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Member States shall establish a system for pre-selecting
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Member States shall establish a risk- rating system for pre-selecting and targeting checks on vehicles or combinations of vehicles in circulation, in order to ensure compliance with the requirements, in particular requirements laid down under article 4a (new), of this Directive.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Member States
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. At the request of a Member State, the Commission shall investigate whether a Member State is complying with the non- discrimination requirement in paragraph 1. If the investigation reveals that the Member State is not complying with this requirement, the Commission shall take the requisite measures against the Member State concerned.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify vehicles that are likely to have committed an offence and that should be checked manually. These measures may be taken with the aid of automatic systems set up on the infrastructure, or onboard systems installed in vehicles in line with paragraph 6 below. The automatic systems must enable the identification of the vehicles suspected of exceeding the maximum authorised weights.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify vehicles that are likely to have committed an offence and that should be checked manually. These measures
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify vehicles that are likely to have committed an offence and that should be checked manually. These measures may be taken with the aid of automatic systems set up on the infrastructure, or onboard systems installed in vehicles in line with paragraph 6 below. The automatic systems must enable the identification of the vehicles suspected of exceeding the maximum authorised weights.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify vehicles that are likely to have committed an offence and that should be checked manually. These measures
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify vehicles that are likely to have committed an offence and that should be checked manually. These measures
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 Member States
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 Member States shall take a number of preselection measures
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 Member States shall take a number of preselection measures equivalent to at least
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 Member States shall take a number of preselection measures equivalent to at least one weighing per
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 4 Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities, through a single contact point, exchange the information necessary to make these checks more effective at EU level, and to facilitate their conduct, notably through the
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 – point i manual roadside inspection with approved measurement equipment after interception of the vehicle,
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 – point i roadside inspection with approved measurement equipment after interception of the vehicle, for the purpose of issuing a sanction if applicable
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 – point ii Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 – point ii sending the transport company notification of the suspected overloading of the vehicle, for information purposes only
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 – point iii Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 5 – point iii Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 6 Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 6 In accordance with paragraph 1, Member States
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 6 In accordance with paragraph 1,
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 6 Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 In accordance with paragraph 1, Member States shall encourage the equipment of vehicles and vehicle combinations with onboard weighing devices (total weight and axle load) to enable the weight data to be communicated at any time from a moving vehicle to an authority carrying out roadside inspections or responsible for regulating the transport of goods. The devices must take into account the national rules for weights applicable on the territory where the data is being communicated from the vehicle. This communication shall be through the interface defined by the CEN DSRC13 standards EN 12253, EN 12795, EN 12834, EN 13372 and ISO 14906. __________________ 13 DSRC: Dedicated Short-Range Communications
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 – indent 1 Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 – indent 2 the procedures for the pre-selection checks referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, the technical specifications, precision requirements and instructions for use and rules governing approval of the equipment used for these preselection checks. These procedures, specifications and instructions for use are intended to ensure that the checks are performed in the same way in all Member States, thereby ensuring equal treatment for all transporters throughout the territory of the Union.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 a (new) (7a) These matters shall be regulated by means of implementing acts.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 4 An overload of between 10 and
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 4 An overload of more than 20 % of the maximum authorised weight in points 2, 3, 4.1 and 4.3 of Annex 1 shall be considered a very serious infringement within the meaning of this Directive, because of the increased risks incurred by other road users. This shall give rise to an immediate
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 5 An overload of more than
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 6 An excess length
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 6 An excess length
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 7 An excess length or excess width of between
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 18 – paragraph 8 An excess length or excess width of the load or of the vehicle of more than
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 Directive 96/53/EC Article 14 For the transport of
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 Directive 96/53/EC Article 14 For the transport of containers, the shipper shall give the road haulier to whom it entrusts the transport of a container a statement indicating the weight of the container moved. If this information is missing or incorrect, the shipper shall incur liability in the same way as
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 Directive 96/53/EC Article 14 For the transport of
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 15 Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 – paragraph 2 The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 8(4)
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 – paragraph 2 The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 8(4), Article 9(5) and Article 12(7) shall be conferred on the Commission for a
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 – paragraph 3 The delegation of power referred to in Articles 8(4)
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 – paragraph 5 A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 8(4)
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 a (new) (15a) The following Article 16 a is added: Article 16 a No later than [five years from the date of publication of this Directive], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation and the effects of this Directive, in particular as regards the impact of this Directive on modal shift.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 a (new) (15a) The following Article 16 a is added: Article 16 a By 01.01.2016 the Commission shall complete a review of this Directive and, if appropriate, on the basis of such a review and its impact assessment, shall submit a proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council by 01.01.2017, to mandate the safety requirements laid down by article 9.2 for all new M2 and M3 vehicles.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.1 – indent 8 a (new) (aa) The following point is added: ‘loaded vehicle transporters: 20,75m’
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a a (new) (aa) The following point is added: loaded vehicle transporters: 20.75m
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.1 (aa) Point 1.1, 18.75, is replaced by: 25.25
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.2.2 three-axle motor vehicle with two or three- axle semi-trailer carrying, in intermodal transport, one or more
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.2.2 ‘two- or three-axle motor vehicle with two or three-
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.2.2 three-axle motor vehicle with two or three- axle semi-trailer carrying, in intermodal transport, one or more intermodal transport units,
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.2.2 ‘two- or three-axle motor vehicle with two or three-
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.2.2 three-axle motor vehicle with two or three- axle semi-trailer carrying, in intermodal transport, one or more intermodal transport units, for a total maximum length of 40
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.4 (ab) Point 1.4 is replaced by the following provision: 1.4 Removable superstructures and standardized freight items such as containers are included in the dimensions specified in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 4.4. Due to the indivisible nature of finished vehicles such as new cars loaded upon specialised transporters, such loaded transporters may exceed the dimensions in point 1.1 to the extent that national regulations and infrastructure conditions allow it and as long as these vehicle transporters when empty comply in full with the abovementioned points.
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.2 a (new) (ba) Point 2.2 a shall be inserted - Ecocombis 60 t
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 2 Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 2 two-axle motor vehicles other than buses, and with hybrid or electric propulsion: 1
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses: 19.5 tonnes
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c two-axle buses: 19.5 tonnes
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses: 19.5 tonnes
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses: 19.5 tonnes
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses:
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 3 two-axle buses: 19.5 tonnes
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.4 (new) (ca) The following point is added : 2.3.4 Low carbon technologies: the maximum weight is that mentioned in point 2.3.1,2.3.2 or 2.3.3 increased by the additional weight required for the low carbon technology, with a maximum of 1 tonne. That additional weight shall be certified and indicated in the official registration documents of the motor vehicle issued by the Member State where the vehicle is registered. In cases where this information is missing, the values mentioned in points 2..1,2.3.2 or 2.3.3 shall apply.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.5 (new) Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.4 (new) (ca) The following point is added : 2.3.4 Alternatively fuelled vehicles: the maximum weight is that mentioned in point 2.3.1, 2.3.2 or 2.3.3 increased by the additional weight required for the alternative propulsion mode, with a maximum of 1,5 tonnes. That additional weight shall be indicated in the official registration documents of the motor vehicle issued by the Member State where the vehicle is registered. In cases where this information is missing, the values mentioned in points 2.3.1., 2.3.2 or 2.3.3 shall apply.
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.1 – indent 3 (16a) Third indent of point 1.1 to read: - articulated vehicle 17.85 m
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.3 (16a) Point 1.3 is replaced by ‘Maximum height of any vehicle is to be decided by Member States under the subsidiarity principle. Member States may choose to engage in bilateral agreements allowing vehicles of an agreed height to circulate on each other’s territories, so long as the infrastructure allows’
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.1 – indent 3 (16a) Point 1.1, indent 3 is replaced by the following: articulated vehicle: 17,85 m
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.6 (16b) Point 1.6 to read: - maximum distance between the axis of the fifth wheel kingpin and the rearmost end of the semi-trailer 13.35 m
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Article 1 – paragraph 7 shall not apply before 1 January 2025.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Title 1 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The White Paper ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’ published in 20116 emphasised the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, by 60% in comparison with 1990 levels by 2050
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) As there are currently no policies in place to deal with the rising CO2 emissions from trucks, the Commission should assess the introduction of fuel efficiency standards for trucks, further extending its legislative approach on cars and vans.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In this context, the White Paper proposed to adapt Council Directive
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers, but which then exceed the maximum lengths allowed under Directive 96/53/EC. This equipment may be installed as soon as this Directive enters into force, as the products are available on the market and already used in other continents. This Directive should also encourage and facilitate innovation in vehicle and transport unit design.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers, but which then exceed the maximum lengths allowed under Directive 96/53/EC. This equipment may be installed as soon as th
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers, but which then exceed the maximum lengths allowed under Directive 96/53/EC. This equipment may be installed as soon as this Directive enters into force, as the products are available on the market and already used in other continents. The same applies to energy absorbing aerodynamic cowls and underrun protective devices affixed in the area of the wheels on the sides and at the rear under the trailers, semi-trailers and vehicles. These can significantly improve the energy efficiency of the vehicle while also significantly reducing the risk of injury to other road users.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers, but which then exceed the maximum lengths allowed under Directive
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) the Commission should develop an approach to reduce empty runs in road freight transport within the framework of measures concerning ‘weights and dimensions’ as well as minimum harmonisation rules for road cabotage in order to avoid dumping practises. Furthermore, the review of the Eurovignette Directive should also be used to reflect progress in estimating the external costs and to mandate the internalisation of external costs for heavy goods vehicles. The Commission should make a proposal to amend Directive 2011/76/EU by 1 January 2015.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Heavy-good vehicles are responsible for about 26 percent of road transport CO2 emissions in Europe while their fuel efficiency has hardly improved for the last 20 years. The improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would also allow significant gains on the energy performance of vehicles and the protection of other road users, in conjunction with the devices made of energy absorbing material mentioned in recital 3 above. However, th
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would also allow significant gains on the energy performance of vehicles
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would also allow significant gains on the energy performance of vehicles, in conjunction with the devices mentioned in recital 3 above. However, this improvement is impossible under the current maximum lengths set by Directive
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-20207 , the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better protect vulnerable road users. The importance of visibility for vehicle drivers was also underlined in the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community8 . A new cab profile will also contribute to improving road safety by reducing the blind spot in the driver’s vision, including under the windscreen and to the side of the vehicle, which should help save the lives of many vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists. This new profile
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-2020, the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better protect vulnerable road users. The importance of visibility for vehicle drivers was also underlined in the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community. A new cab profile will also contribute to improving road safety by reducing the blind spot in the drivers’ vision, including under the windscreen, which should help save the lives of many vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists. The new cab profile should therefore, after an appropriate transitional period, become mandatory. This new profile
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-20207 , the Commission set out
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-20207 , the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-2020, the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better protect vulnerable road users. The importance of visibility for vehicle drivers was also underlined in the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community. A new cab profile will also contribute to improving road safety by reducing the blind spot in the drivers
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-20207 , the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better protect vulnerable road users. The importance of visibility for vehicle drivers was also underlined in the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community8 .
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Aerodynamic devices and their installation in vehicles must be tested, in accordance with the test procedure for measurement of aerodynamic performance being developed by the European Commission, before being put on the market. To this end, Member States are to issue certificates that will be recognised by other Member States. The Commission should develop detailed technical guidelines on the application and requirements for certificates.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Aerodynamic devices and their installation in vehicles must be tested before being put on the market. To this end, Member States
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Member States entering into agreements that allow longer and heavier vehicles to be used in cross-border transport should ensure that the 2030 and 2050 goals regarding the targets of 30% and 50%8a respectively are not burdensome to the economy and acknowledge that, long-haul road freight is economically positive. It should be proven, documented and reported to the Commission for its approval that the present and future role of longer and heavier vehicles is complementing rather than competing with rail and waterborne transport. ___________ 8a OJ C 168 E, 14.6.2013, p. 72.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In order to meet the objectives of the White Paper on Transport published in 2011 the revision of Directive 96/53/EC is an opportunity to improve the driver’s safety and comfort taking into account the requirements set out in the Occupational Health and Safety Framework Directive 89/391/EEC.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer vehicles may be used in cross- border transport if the
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer and higher vehicles may be used in cross-
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer vehicles may not be used in cross-
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer, higher and/or heavier vehicles may be used in cross-
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer vehicles
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer and/or heavier vehicles may be used in cross-
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer and/or heavy goods vehicles may be used in cross-
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer vehicles may be used in cross- border transport if t
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Longer and/or heavier vehicles may be used in
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Longer and heavier goods vehicles are expected to require investments to adapt and maintain the road infrastructure as well as to strengthen measures to reduce noise, air pollution, accidents and congestion. Thereby, Member states may in any case prohibit the use of these vehicles within their territory ;
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The use of longer vehicles in international transport operations will have consequences on road safety, on the environment and on road infrastructure. Before lifting the existing ban on longer and heavier vehicles in international transport operations, the Commission should assess the potential impacts of such a change of rules.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Any changes to the dimension of heavy goods vehicles, be it to their length, height, width or their weight, would place a heavy financial impact on member states to adapt infrastructure, be it motorway exits, bridges, tunnels, roundabouts or gradients on steep streets
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The Commission should work on a harmonised approach concerning approval procedures for special permits for vehicles and vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum dimensions in accordance with Article 4 (3). The procedures of competent authorities in different Members States and /or regions allowing indivisible loads to circulate need to be aligned.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to assess the impact of vehicles exceeding the dimensions set up by this Directive on road safety, it is appropriate that Member States collect data of accidents involving heavy good vehicles longer than 18.75 m. The Commission should consider proposing the inclusion of these data among the annual reporting obligations of Member States in the framework of Council Decision 93/704/EC on the creation of a Community database on road accidents.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Using alternative engines that no longer rely only on fossil fuels and are therefore
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Using low-carbon technologies, including alternative engines that no longer rely only on fossil fuels and are therefore non-polluting or less polluting, such as electric or hybrid engines for heavy-duty vehicles or buses (mainly in urban or suburban environments), generates extra weight which should not be counted at the expense of the effective load of the vehicle so that the road transport sector is not penalised in economic terms.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Using alternative engines that no longer rely only on fossil fuels and are therefore non-polluting or less polluting, such as electric or hybrid engines for heavy-duty vehicles or buses (mainly in urban or suburban environments) generates extra weight which should not be counted at the expense of the effective load of the vehicle so that the road transport sector is not penalised in economic terms. Vehicles with alternative engine technologies should be permitted to exceed the maximum weight by up to one tonne. However, the extra weight should not increase the load capacity of the vehicle. The principle of technological neutrality should be maintained.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Using alternative engines that no longer rely only on fossil fuels and are therefore non-polluting or less polluting, such as
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8)
source: PE-524.694
2015/02/04
TRAN
9 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8b – paragraph 2a (new) 2a. The devices referred to in paragraph 1 shall meet the following operational conditions: (a) in circumstances where the safety of other road users or of the driver is at risk, those devices shall be folded, retracted or removed by the driver; (b) their use on urban and inter urban road infrastructures shall take into account the special characteristics of areas where the allowed maximum speed limit does not exceed 50 km/h and where more vulnerable road users are more likely to be present; and (c) the use of those devices shall be compatible with intermodal transport operations. In particular, when retracted or folded, those devices shall not increase the maximum authorised length by more than 20 cm. (d) the devices should be safe and practical for the driver.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, to improve road safety, to adapt the relevant legislation to technological developments and changing market needs
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, to improve road safety, to adapt the relevant legislation to technological developments and changing market needs and to facilitate intermodal transport operations, while ensuring undistorted competition, something Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 has failed to do, and protecting the road infrastructure, must be emphasised.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, to improve road safety, to adapt the relevant legislation to technological developments and changing market needs and to facilitate intermodal transport operations, while
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) Infringements in relation to overloaded vehicles need to be suitably addressed by Member States, to ensure road safety.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to ensure undistorted competition between operators and to improve the detection of infringements, Member States should, by …6 , take specific measures to identify vehicles or vehicle combinations in circulation that are likely to have exceeded the relevant weight limits and should therefore be checked. Such identification may be carried out by means of weighing mechanisms built into the road infrastructure, or by means of on- board sensors in vehicles that communicate data remotely to the relevant authorities. Such on-board data shall be made available also to the driver. Every year each Member State should perform an appropriate number of vehicle weight checks. The number of such checks sh
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure compliance with this Directive, Member States should lay down rules on penalties for infringements of this Directive and should ensure their implementation. Those penalties should be effective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and dissuasive. Penalties should, if practically possible, be paid on the spot.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The Commission sh
source: 546.895
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/7 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2014-12-11T00:00:00New
2014-12-10T00:00:00 |
events/10/date |
Old
2015-02-24T00:00:00New
2015-02-23T00:00:00 |
events/13/docs |
|
events/18 |
|
events/18 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2013&number=0105&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2013&number=0105&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4581)(documentyear:2013)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4581)(documentyear:2013)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.689New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-521689_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.694New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-524694_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE544.397New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-544397_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.895New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-546895_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0169/COM_COM(2015)0169_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0169/COM_COM(2015)0169_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0032_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0032_EN.html |
events/13/docs |
|
events/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0046_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0046_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0007/COM_COM(2015)0007_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0007/COM_COM(2015)0007_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0256&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0256_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0353New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0353_EN.html |
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0032&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0032_EN.html |
events/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0046New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0046_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/00570New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 115 06.05.2015, p. 0001New
Directive 2015/719 |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:115:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32015L0719 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/16 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/14 |
|
activities/15 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/13 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/12/docs/1/text/0 |
Old
New
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the Council position at first reading with view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic. Parliaments position adopted at second reading of the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Councils position as follows: Intermodal transport operation: the definition should cover: · the combined transport operations defined in Article 1 of Council Directive 92/106/EEC engaged in the transport of one or more containers or swap bodies, up to a total maximum length of 45 feet, or; · transport operations engaged in the transport of one or more containers or swap bodies, up to a total maximum length of 45 feet, using waterborne transport, provided that the length of the initial or the final road leg does not exceed 150 km in the territory of the Union. Aerodynamic devices: improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would allow significant gains in respect of the energy performance of vehicles. Parliament stipulated that the aerodynamic devices shall fulfil the following operational conditions: · in circumstances where the safety of other road users or of the driver is at risk, they shall be folded, retracted or removed by the driver; · their use on urban and inter urban road infrastructures shall take into account the special characteristics of areas where the speed limit is less than or equal to 50 km/h and where vulnerable road users are more likely to be present; and · their use shall be compatible with intermodal transport operations and, in particular, when retracted/folded, they shall not exceed the maximum authorised length by more than 20 cm. On-board weighing equipment: this shall be accurate and reliable, fully interoperable and compatible with all vehicle types. One year after the date of entry into force of the Directive, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts, laying down detailed provisions ensuring uniform conditions for the implementation of the rules on interoperability and compatibility. In order to ensure compatibility with all vehicle types, on-board systems of motor vehicles shall have the capability to receive and process any data coming from any type of trailer or semi-trailer attached to the motor vehicle. Infringements in relation to overloaded vehicles: these need to be addressed adequately by Member States in order to avoid any distortions of competition and to ensure road safety. Review: the Commission shall review the Directive 3 years after national rules are in place, taking into consideration certain market segments. On the basis of that report, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment. |
activities/12/docs/1/text |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council decision, 2nd readingNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/9 |
|
activities/10 |
|
activities/11 |
|
activities/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 2nd readingNew
Awaiting Council decision, 2nd reading |
procedure/subject/0 |
2.10.03 Standardisation, EC standards and trademark, certification, compliance
|
procedure/subject/1 |
2.80 Cooperation between administrations
|
procedure/subject/5 |
3.20.10 Transport undertakings, transport industry employees
|
procedure/subject/6 |
3.20.11 Trans-European transport networks
|
procedure/subject/7 |
3.40.03 Motor industry, cycle and motorcycle, commercial and agricultural vehicles
|
procedure/subject/8 |
3.60.02 Oil industry, motor fuels
|
procedure/subject/9 |
3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
KALLAS SiimNew
BULC Violeta |
other/1/commissioner |
Old
KALLAS SiimNew
BULC Violeta |
activities/8/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/7 |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/12504New
TRAN/8/00570 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Political agreement on Council positionNew
Awaiting Parliament 2nd reading |
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186f90fb8127435bdc126New
4f1ad99db819f207b3000027 |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188e60fb8127435bdc3eaNew
4f1ac457b819f25896000007 |
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
activities/2/committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186f90fb8127435bdc126New
4f1ad99db819f207b3000027 |
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188e60fb8127435bdc3eaNew
4f1ac457b819f25896000007 |
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186f90fb8127435bdc126New
4f1ad99db819f207b3000027 |
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188e60fb8127435bdc3eaNew
4f1ac457b819f25896000007 |
activities/3/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
committees/3/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186f90fb8127435bdc126New
4f1ad99db819f207b3000027 |
committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188e60fb8127435bdc3eaNew
4f1ac457b819f25896000007 |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186540fb8127435bdc03eNew
4f1ad24db819f27595000018 |
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2014-07-16T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/3/date |
2014-07-16T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/3/date |
2014-07-16T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/3/date |
2014-07-16T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
2.10.03 Standardisation, EC standards and trade mark, certification, complianceNew
2.10.03 Standardisation, EC standards and trademark, certification, compliance |
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/1/committees/4 |
|
activities/2/committees/4 |
|
activities/3/committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2013-05-14T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/3/date |
2013-05-14T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/3/date |
2013-05-14T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/6 |
|
committees/3/date |
2013-05-14T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Political agreement on Council position |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52013DC0195:ENNew
CELEX:52013PC0195:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52013PC0195:ENNew
CELEX:52013DC0195:EN |
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0353
|
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=195New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=195 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=195New
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=195 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-04-03T00:00:00New
2014-04-14T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-03-13T00:00:00New
2014-04-03T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-02-11T00:00:00New
2014-03-18T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-04-15T00:00:00New
2014-03-13T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/1 |
|
activities/0/docs/2 |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.694
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0195:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0195:EN
|
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013AE4581:EN
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.689
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE : to amend Directive 96/53/EC on the maximum authorised weights in road traffic vehicles, with the aim of reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, so as to adapt the legislation to technological developments and changing market needs and to facilitate intermodal transport. PROPOSED ACT : Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (amendment of Council Directive 96/53/EC). ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT : The European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND : it has become crucial to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of petroleum products in the field of transport, and even more crucial for road transport, which accounts for 82% of the energy consumption of the transport sector. Furthermore, the steady rise in the price of fuel prompts the need to identify solutions to reduce vehicle fuel consumption. In the light of the evolving market and the technologies available, the question today is whether the choices made when the Directive was adopted in 1996 are still relevant. The White Paper on Transport Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system published in 2011 set a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 60% by 2050 in comparison with 1990 levels. In this context, the White Paper announced the revision of the 1996 Directive, with the aim of allowing more energy- efficient, aerodynamic vehicles to be put on the market. IMPACT ASSESSMENT : the proposed measures are the result of public and sectoral consultations held in 2011 and 2012 and organized by the Commission. They were examined in an impact assessment, which looked at several options in terms of economic and environmental efficiency. The option selected combines technical harmonisation work conducted with a group of experts with a view to adopting delegated acts and a moderate regulatory approach, in order to avoid imposing disproportionate or inapplicable obligations, which would penalise small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. LEGAL BASIS : Article 91 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT : the Commission proposes to amend Directive 96/53/EC to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and their energy efficiency, while continuing to improve road safety, and within the limits imposed by the geometry of road infrastructures. Specifically, the proposal: · grants derogations from the maximum dimensions of vehicles for the addition of aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles or to redefine the geometry of the cabs for tractors, improving drivers field of vision, and improving their safety and comfort. The Commission will, with the assistance of a Committee, specify these requirements at a later stage; · authorises a weight increase of one tonne for vehicles with an electric or hybrid propulsion, to take account of the weight of batteries or the dual motorisation, without prejudice to the load capacity of the vehicle. Furthermore, the maximum weight of buses will be increased by a tonne to take account of various developments such as the increase in the average weight of passengers and their baggage, of new equipment imposed by the safety regulations, and the new Euro VI class; · will facilitate the development of intermodal transport by allowing a derogation of 15 cm in the length of trucks carrying 45-foot containers, which are increasingly used in intercontinental and European transport; · confirms that cross-border use of longer vehicles is lawful for journeys that only cross one border, if the two Member States concerned already allow it and if the conditions for derogations under the Directive are met; · adds new provisions to enable the inspection authorities to better detect infringements and harmonise administrative penalties that apply to them. The Commission will publish guidelines on inspection procedures to ensure harmonisation of inspection methods between all Member States. The latter must carry out a minimum number of vehicle checks, using either weighing systems built into the road or by means of onboard sensors in vehicles that communicate remotely with roadside inspectors. The Commission will define the technical standards for onboard weighing devices that can communicate with the inspection authorities. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS : the proposal has no implications for the EU budget. In order to accelerate the introduction of vehicles that are more aerodynamic and have hybrid motorisation, the Commission will use the budgets at its disposal, in particular those allocated to trans-European networks and the EU programmes for research, development and innovation, to help industrial research, and equipping vehicle fleets. DELEGATED ACTS : the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. New
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 96/53/EC on the maximum authorised weights in road traffic vehicles, with the aim of reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, so as to adapt the legislation to technological developments and changing market needs and to facilitate intermodal transport. PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (amendment of Council Directive 96/53/EC). ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: it has become crucial to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of petroleum products in the field of transport, and even more crucial for road transport, which accounts for 82% of the energy consumption of the transport sector. Furthermore, the steady rise in the price of fuel prompts the need to identify solutions to reduce vehicle fuel consumption. In the light of the evolving market and the technologies available, the question today is whether the choices made when the Directive was adopted in 1996 are still relevant. The White Paper on Transport Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system published in 2011 set a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 60% by 2050 in comparison with 1990 levels. In this context, the White Paper announced the revision of the 1996 Directive, with the aim of allowing more energy- efficient, aerodynamic vehicles to be put on the market. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposed measures are the result of public and sectoral consultations held in 2011 and 2012 and organized by the Commission. They were examined in an impact assessment which looked at several options in terms of economic and environmental efficiency. The option selected combines technical harmonisation work conducted with a group of experts with a view to adopting delegated acts and a moderate regulatory approach, in order to avoid imposing disproportionate or inapplicable obligations, which would penalise small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. LEGAL BASIS: Article 91 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the Commission proposes to amend Directive 96/53/EC to improve the aerodynamics of vehicles and their energy efficiency, while continuing to improve road safety, and within the limits imposed by the geometry of road infrastructures. Specifically, the proposal:
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget. In order to accelerate the introduction of vehicles that are more aerodynamic and have hybrid motorisation, the Commission will use the budgets at its disposal, in particular those allocated to trans-European networks and the EU programmes for research, development and innovation, to help industrial research, and equipping vehicle fleets. DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2013-05-14T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/date |
2013-05-14T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|