Activites

• 2015/03/10 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • T8-0048/2015 summary

• 2015/02/18 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • A8-0022/2015 summary

    The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN (EPP, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on interchange fees for card-based payment transactions. The matter had been referred back to the competent committee for reconsideration during the plenary sitting of 3.4.2014. The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows: Reduce transaction costs for consumers: Members stated that a consistent application of the competition rules to interchange fees would improve the functioning of the internal market and contribute to reducing transaction costs for consumers. Interchange fee caps: as regards interchange fees for consumer debit card transactions, payment service providers shall not offer or request a per transaction interchange fee of more than 0.2% of the value of the transaction for any debit card transaction. For domestic debit card transactions Member States may either: ·         define a per transaction percentage interchange fee cap lower than 0.2% and may impose a fixed maximum fee amount as a limit on the fee amount resulting from the applicable percentage rate; ·         allow payment service providers to apply a per transaction interchange fee of no more than EUR 0.05, or, which may also be combined with a maximum percentage rate of no more than 0.2%, provided always that the sum of interchange fees of the payment card scheme does not exceed 0.2% of the total annual transaction value of the domestic debit card transactions within each payment card scheme. Until five years and six months after the entry into force of this Regulation, Member States may allow payment service providers to apply a weighted average interchange fee of no more than the equivalent of 0.2% of the annual average transaction value of all domestic debit card transactions within each payment card scheme. Member States may define a lower weighted average interchange fee cap applicable to all domestic debit card transactions. For interchange fees for consumer credit card transactions, payment service providers shall not offer or request a per transaction interchange fee of more than 0.3% of the value of the transaction for any credit card transaction. For domestic credit card transactions Member States may define a lower per transaction interchange fee cap. Three-party payment systems: until 42 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation, in relation to domestic payment transactions, such a three party payment card scheme (cardholder - acquiring and issuing scheme - merchant) may be exempted from the obligations under the Regulation, provided that the card-based payment transactions made in a Member State under such a three party payment card scheme do not exceed on a yearly basis 3% of the value of all card-based payment transactions made in that Member State. A commercial card used only for business expenses charged directly to the account of the undertaking or public sector entity or the self-employed natural person shall be exempt from the new provisions. Business rules (licensing): any territorial restrictions within the Union or rules with an equivalent effect in licensing agreements or in payment card scheme rules for issuing payment cards or acquiring card-based payment transactions shall be prohibited. Separation of payment card scheme and processing entities: payment card schemes and processing entities: (a) shall be independent in terms of accounting, organisation and decision-making processes; (b) shall not present prices for payment card scheme and processing activities in a bundled manner and shall not cross-subsidise such activities. The European Banking Authority (EBA) may, after consulting an advisory panel, develop draft regulatory technical standards establishing the requirements to be complied with by payment card schemes and processing entities to ensure the proper application of this Regulation. Co-badging and choice of payment brand or payment application: when entering into a contractual agreement with a payment service provider, the consumer may require two or more different payment brands on a card-based payment instrument provided that such a service is offered by the payment service provider. In good time before the contract is signed, the payment service provider shall provide the consumer with clear and objective information on all the payment brands available and their characteristics, including their functionality, cost and security. Payees shall retain the option of installing automatic mechanisms in the equipment used at the point of sale which make a priority selection of a particular payment brand or payment application but payees shall not prevent the payer from overriding such an automatic priority selection made by the payee in its equipment for the categories of cards or related payment instruments accepted by the payee. Universal cards: in order to ensure an adequate level playing field between the different categories of payment cards, it is appropriate to apply the same rule provided by this Regulation for the debit card transactions to such 'universal cards' domestic payment transaction. However, in exceptional circumstances and during a transition period of 18 months from the entry into force of the Regulation, Member States may define a share of no more than 30% of the domestic payment transactions by universal cards shall be considered to be equivalent to credit card transactions. Review clause: by four year after the entry into force of the Regulation, the Commission should present a report studying various effects of this Regulation on the functioning of the market. It is necessary that the Commission has the possibility to collect the information required to establish this report in cooperation with the competent authorities.

• 2015/01/27 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
• 2014/10/20 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 2014/04/03 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • T7-0279/2014 summary

    The European Parliament adopted amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on interchange fees for card-based payment transactions. The matter was referred back for further examination to the committee responsible. The vote was postponed until a subsequent plenary session. The main amendments adopted in plenary were the following: Reduce transaction costs for consumers: the amended text underlines that the interchange fees charged by banks to merchants are a main component of the fees charged to merchants by acquiring payment service providers for every card transaction. Merchants in turn incorporate these card costs, like all their other costs, in the general prices of goods and services.  According to Members, consistent application of the competition rules to interchange fees would reduce transaction costs for consumers and thus improve the functioning of the internal market. Caps on interchange fees: ·        For credit card transactions, Members supported the European Commission’s proposal to place a cap on the bank’s fee of 0.3% of the value of the transaction. ·        For debit card transactions, the parliamentary committee proposed a cap of 0.07 euros or 0.2% of the value of the transaction, whichever was the higher. These caps would concern national and transnational transactions within the EU and would apply one year after the entry into force of the regulation. Member States may maintain or introduce lower caps or measures of equivalent object or effect through national legislation. Circumvention: competent authorities must prevent any attempts by the payment service providers to circumvent the Regulation, including the issuance of payment cards in third countries. Licensing rules: any restriction of the provision of payment-related services in payment card schemes rules should be prohibited, unless it was non-discriminatory and objectively necessary to operate the payment scheme. Cross-border transactions: to allow the single market to operate most effectively, it was necessary to ensure that the interchange fee applied for all transactions is that of the Member State in which the acquirer was situated.  Separation of payment card scheme and processing entities: scheme rules and rules in licensing agreements or other contracts leading to a restriction on the freedom to choose a processor shall be prohibited. One year after the entry into force of the regulation, processing entities within the Union should ensure that their system is technically interoperable with other systems of processing entities within the Union through the use of standards developed by international or European standardisation bodies. After consulting an advisory panel, EBA should develop draft regulatory technical standards establishing requirements to be complied with by payment systems, payment schemes and processing entities to ensure a fully open and competitive card processing market. Co-badging and choice of payment application: according to the amended text, payment card schemes, issuers, acquirers and payment card handling infrastructure providers should not insert automatic mechanisms, software or devices on the payment instrument or on equipment applied at the point of sale which limit the choice of application by the payer and the payee when using a co-badged payment instrument.  Payees should retain the option of installing automatic mechanisms in the equipment used at the point of sale which make a priority selection of a particular brand or application. However, payees should not prevent the payer, for the categories of cards or related payment instruments accepted by the payee, from overriding an automatic priority selection made by the payee in its equipment. Information to the payee: when entering into a contractual agreement with a payment services provider, the consumer should also be provided with clear and objective periodical information about the payment characteristics and payment fees applied to payment transactions. Payment service providers should also participate in complaints procedures. Review clause: within two years of entry into force of the regulation, the Commission should submit a report on the application of the regulation. The assessment should consider: (i) the development of cardholder fees; (ii) the level of competition among payment card providers and schemes; (iii) the effects on costs for the payer and the payee; (iv) the levels of merchant pass-through of the reduction in interchange levels; (v) the technical requirements and its implications for all the parties involved ; (vi) the effects of co-badging on user-friendliness, in particular for the elderly and other vulnerable users. The report should be accompanied by a legislative proposal that might include a proposed amendment of the maximum cap for interchange fees.

• 2014/04/02 Debate in Parliament
  • Debate in Parliament
• 2014/03/11 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • A7-0167/2014 summary

    The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN (EPP, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on interchange fees for card-based payment transactions The committee recommended that the position of the European Parliament adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows: Purpose: the Regulation lays down uniform technical and business requirements for card-based payment transactions carried out within the Union, where both the payer's payment service provider and the payee's payment service provider are established therein. The regulation should apply to transactions with commercial cards, but should not apply to: (i) cash withdrawals or transactions other than sales of goods or services performed at automatic teller machines and cash disbursements at the counter of payment service providers' premises; and (ii) transactions with cards issued by three party payment card schemes where their volume does not exceed a threshold set by the Commission. Cost-efficient domestic debit card schemes that already today operate with an interchange fee level below the threshold proposed by the Commission (0.2 %) could be exempted from the business rules if national authorities decided to opt out.  Limit on interchange fees: ·        for credit card transactions, Members supported the Commission proposal to limit the fees to 0.3 % of the value of the transaction; ·        for debit card transactions, the committee proposed a limit of the lower amount of 7 eurocents or 0.2 % of the value of the transaction. These rules will apply from the entry into force of the regulation. Member States may maintain or introduce lower caps or measures of equivalent object or effect through national legislation. Circumvention: competent authorities must prevent any attempts by the payment service providers to circumvent the Regulation, including the issuance of payment cards in third countries. Licensing rules: any restriction of the provision of payment-related services in payment card schemes rules should be prohibited, unless it was non-discriminatory and objectively necessary to operate the payment scheme. Cross-border transactions: to allow the single market to operate most effectively, it was necessary to ensure that the interchange fee applied for all transactions is that of the Member State in which the acquirer was situated. This would facilitate competition below capped rates where these are applicable. Separation of payment card scheme and processing entities: one year after the entry into force of the regulation, processing entities within the Union should ensure that their system was technically interoperable with other systems of processing entities within the Union through the use of standards developed by international or European standardisation bodies. After consulting an advisory panel, EBA should develop draft regulatory technical standards establishing requirements to be complied with by payment systems, payment schemes and processing entities to ensure a fully open and competitive card processing market. Member States may exempt newly established card-based payment schemes from applying this provision for a limited period of time by way of derogation after consulting the Commission. Competition between brands: in order to ensure that competition between brands was effective, Members felt that the choice of payment application should be made by users, not imposed by the upstream market, comprising payment card systems, payment service providers or processors. Such an arrangement should not prevent payers and payees from setting a default choice of application, where technically feasible, provided that that choice can be changed for each transaction. If the payee selected an application supported by both, the user should be able to reject it and choose another application. Information to the payee: when entering into a contractual agreement with a payment services provider, the consumer should also be provided with clear and objective periodical information about the payment characteristics and payment fees applied to payment transactions. Member States should ensure that payment service providers participate in complaints procedures. Review clause: within two years of entry into force of the regulation, the commission should submit a report on the application of the regulation. The assessment should consider: (i) the development of cardholder fees; (ii) the level of competition among payment card providers and schemes; (iii) the effects on costs for the payer and the payee; (iv) the levels of merchant pass-through of the reduction in interchange levels; (v) the technical requirements and its implications for all the parties involved. The report should be accompanied by a legislative proposal that might include a proposed amendment of the maximum cap for interchange fees.

• 2013/10/08 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 2013/07/24 Legislative proposal published
  • COM(2013)0550 summary

    PURPOSE: to lay down uniform technical and business requirements on interchange fees for card-based payment transactions. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: the regulatory and legislative framework for retail payments in the EU has been developed over the past 12 years, with the advent of the Euro acting as an accelerating factor. One of the key practices hindering the achievement of an integrated market reasons is the widespread use of so-called Multilateral Interchange Fees (MIFs). At present, no legislation regulating interchange fees is in place in the EU. MIFs are collectively agreed inter-bank fees usually between the acquiring payment service providers and the issuing payment service providers belonging to a certain scheme. Such interchange fees paid by acquiring payment service providers form part of the fees they charge to merchants which merchants in turn pass on to consumers. Thus, high Interchange Fees paid by merchants result in higher final prices for goods and services, which are paid by all consumers. There currently is a wide variety of interchange fees applied within national and international payment card schemes, which gives rise to market fragmentation and prevents retailers and consumers from enjoying the benefits of an internal market for goods and services. Market entry for pan-European players remains difficult, as domestic interchange fees in EU Member States vary widely and new entrants would have to offer interchange fees at least comparable to those prevailing in each market they want to enter. The entry barriers interchange fees thus created for online and mobile payment solutions also result in less innovation. Over the last 20 years, the European Commission and national competition authorities have conducted a number of antitrust proceedings addressing anti-competitive practices in the card payment market. The General Court judgment of May 2012 confirmed the Commission's finding in its MasterCard Decision of December 2007 that MIFs restrict competition as they inflate the cost of card acceptance by merchants without leading to benefits for consumers. In its non-legislative resolution of 20 November 2012 on the Green Paper 'Towards an integrated European market for card, internet and mobile payments”, the Parliament took a firm position in favour of providing clarity on interchange fees to market participants and expressed itself in favour of a gradual approach leading to a ban on interchange fees through regulation. LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment considers six scenarios for interchange fees. The assessment concludes that the most beneficial option appears to be a combination of: capping the level of interchange fees for cross-border transactions with consumer debit and credit cards (in the first stage) and, in a second stage, capping the level of interchange fees also for domestic transactions with consumer credit cards and consumer debit cards; a series of measures to enhance effective market functioning including the limitation of the rule allowing merchants to determine the choice of card brand at the point of sale for all cards and card-based transactions based on four party scheme models. CONTENT: the present regulation, combined with the proposed revised Payment Services Directive, proposes to create common rules for interchange fees in the European Union by introducing maximum fee levels for transactions with payment cards that are widely used by consumers and thereby difficult to refuse or surcharge by retailers. The regulation will in addition propose transparency measures to allow retailers and consumers to make better informed choices of payment instruments. Capping interchange fees: the Commission proposes to set caps for interchange fees to payment service providers of 0.2% and 0.3% for the value of the transaction for all consumer debit and credit transactions. These figures have been accepted by Visa, MasterCard and the French domestic card scheme Groupement Cartes Bancaires. During a transition period of two years, maximum levels of interchange fees are imposed for cross-border transactions (where the card holder uses their card in another Member State) or cross-border acquired transactions (where the merchant uses an acquiring PSP in another Member State) only. After a transitional period, the regulation of interchange fees for consumer cards should therefore be extended to cover also domestic interchange fees. Business rules: the proposed Regulation contains measures as regards business rules that will be applicable to all categories of card transactions and card-based payment transactions based on those. As of the entry into force of the regulation, for instance: the application of the 'Honour All Cards Rule' will be limited. No discrimination will be nonetheless allowed on the basis of the issuing bank or the provenance of the card holder and between the cards carrying the same interchange fee level; the application of any rule preventing or limiting merchants from steering customers to more efficient payments instruments ('no steering rules') will be prohibited; acquiring Payment Service Providers will provide at least monthly statements of fees to merchants, in which the fees paid by the merchant over the relevant month concerning each category of cards and each individual brand for when the acquirer provides acquiring services is specified; the application of any rule withholding merchants from disclosing to their customers fees they pay to payment services acquirers will be prohibited. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal does not have any impact on the EU budget.

  • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/', 'title': 'Internal Market and Services'}, MOSCOVICI Pierre

Documents

• Legislative proposal published: COM(2013)0550
• Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0167/2014
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0279/2014
• Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A8-0022/2015
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T8-0048/2015

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)