BETA

Procedure completed



2013/2013(INI) Annual report of the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead PETI MCMILLAN-SCOTT Edward (ALDE) BĂSESCU Elena (PPE), GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel (S&D), ŽDANOKA Tatjana (Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier: PETI/7/11542
Legal Basis RoP 216-p8

Activites

  • 2013/10/10 Results of vote in Parliament
    • Results of vote in Parliament
    • Debate in Parliament
    • T7-0421/2013 summary
  • 2013/09/24 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A7-0299/2013 summary
  • 2013/09/17 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/03/11 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
135 2013/2013(INI)
2013/07/12 PETI 135 amendments...
source: PE-516.637

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

other/0/dg/title
Old
Secretariat General
New
Secretariat-General
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: BĂSESCU Elena group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel group: Verts/ALE name: ŽDANOKA Tatjana responsible: True committee: PETI date: 2013-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Petitions rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MCMILLAN-SCOTT Edward
activities/0/date
Old
2013-07-12T00:00:00
New
2013-03-11T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.637 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.637
activities/0/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1
date
2013-07-09T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.200 type: Committee draft report title: PE508.200
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de186710fb8127435bdc065
New
4f1ad951b819f207b300000d
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de183740fb8127435bdbc1b
New
4f1ac634b819f25efd000026
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1850a0fb8127435bdbe6e
New
4f1ac45fb819f2589600000b
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de189850fb8127435bdc4bc
New
4f1adcc7b819f207b3000139
activities/1/date
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00
New
2013-09-17T00:00:00
activities/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/3
date
2013-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BĂSESCU Elena group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel group: Verts/ALE name: ŽDANOKA Tatjana responsible: True committee: PETI date: 2013-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Petitions rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MCMILLAN-SCOTT Edward
activities/3/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23434&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/3/docs/2
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-421
text

The European Parliament adopted by 446 votes to 35 with 43 abstentions, a resolution on the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012.

In 2012 the Committee on Petitions registered 1 986 petitions, mostly referring to the themes of fundamental rights, the environment the internal market, and economic and social crisis.

1 406 petitions were declared admissible, and of those 853 were forwarded to the Commission for further investigation and 580 petitions were declared inadmissible.

The highest number of petitions referred to the EU as a whole (27.3 %), followed by Spanish (15.0 %), German (12.5 %) and Italian (8.6 %) cases.

Fundamental rights: fundamental rights remained a key subject of the petitions submitted, notably raising issues related to the rights of persons with disabilities, children’s rights, property rights, the right of free movement, including the portability of social security entitlements, without encountering any form of discrimination on any grounds, the protection of freedom of expression and privacy, freedom of association, and the right of access to documents and information.

Parliament called on Member States to apply correctly and respect those rights as set out in the Treaty and called on the Commission to take the necessary measures to oblige non-compliant Member States to close the gap between national laws and the fundamental rights of EU citizens.

An amendment adopted in plenary underlined the need to give special attention to the right to historical memory and the rights to truth, justice and redress for families which suffered under Franco's dictatorship, as well as to the right of Spain's abducted children to know the identity of their biological parents.

Discrimination: the resolution drew attention to persisting discrimination against citizens on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, belonging to a minority group, age or sexual orientation. It warned, in particular, that the Roma population across the EU continues to face obstacles to inclusion and called on the Commission to facilitate intergovernmental cooperation in this area, to provide adequate funding for the implementation of national strategies for Roma inclusion.

Citizens’ rights: Members noted that citizens in the European Union continue to face barriers within the internal market, notably while exercising their freedom of movement as individuals, as providers and consumers of goods and services and as workers, such as, for instance, in the case of Romanian and Bulgarian workers who continue to face restrictions on the labour market in some Member States.

Parliament called on Member States to ensure freedom of movement for all EU citizens and their families, on the basis of the principles of mutual recognition, equality, non-discrimination, dignity and respect for private and family life.

Members also welcomed the Petitions Committee's conclusions from the fact-finding visit to Berlin on youth and family welfare matters, particularly in cross-border custody cases. They noted, however, based on the continuing inflow of petitions of this nature, that it is clear the issue of cross-border custody cases is ongoing.

Environment: Members pointed to the numerous petitions submitted on waste management, on water, on the possible dangers of nuclear energy and genetic engineering, on protected species, and on the assessment of the impact of projects and activities on the environment and on public health, such as shale gas extraction by means of fracking.

The Commission is called upon to:

·        adopt a precautionary and preventive approach when assessing projects with a potential negative environmental or public health impact;

·        strengthen the environmental legislative framework on the environment and combating climate change;

·        take action to ensure that the Member States understand that water is a public good;

·        (stringently apply precautionary principle in respect of the use of biotechnology and nanotechnology in products that could seriously affect the health of consumers.

Parliament also stressed the need to regulate coastal protection effectively, but noted that the costal law is not consistent with the objectives sought, since the former is affecting historic heritage and traditional communities.

Information and citizen participation:  the Eurobarometer of public opinion indicated that only 36 % of EU citizens consider themselves well informed about their rights and only 24 % felt well informed about what they can do if their rights are not respected. The resolution stressed the need for:

·        improved access to information and the need to put in place a more practical and visible petitions web portal by the end of 2013;

·        making the petition procedure more efficient, transparent, and impartial so that the handling of petitions stands up to judicial review even at a procedural level;

·        more precise, written, procedural rules in relation to the preparation, implementation and evaluation of visits, ensuring on the one hand that all members of a fact-finding visit have the right to present the facts from their point of view while, on the other hand, guaranteeing all Committee Members the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process concerning the conclusions and recommendations to be drawn by the Committee on Petitions.

Members believed that the role and responsibilities of the Petitions Committee would be best performed, and its visibility, efficiency, accountability and transparency best enhanced, by improving its means for bringing issues of importance to European citizens to plenary, and upgrading its abilities to call witnesses, conduct investigations and organise hearings.

Lastly, Parliament stated its concern about the obstacles that have emerged during the first months of the practical application of the European Citizens' Initiative. It called on the Commission to consider seriously bringing forward the date of the review prescribed in Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011.

type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
title
T7-0421/2013
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in Parliament
New
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de186710fb8127435bdc065
New
4f1ad951b819f207b300000d
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de183740fb8127435bdbc1b
New
4f1ac634b819f25efd000026
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1850a0fb8127435bdbe6e
New
4f1ac45fb819f2589600000b
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de189850fb8127435bdc4bc
New
4f1adcc7b819f207b3000139
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 202-p8
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 216-p8
activities/5
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131010&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!?
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/1/date
Old
2013-10-10T00:00:00
New
2013-07-09T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.200 type: Committee draft report title: PE508.200
activities/1/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Committee draft report
activities/2
date
2013-07-12T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.637 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.637
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/date
Old
2013-07-09T00:00:00
New
2013-07-12T00:00:00
activities/2/docs/0/title
Old
PE508.200
New
PE516.637
activities/2/docs/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.200
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.637
activities/2/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Petitions adopted an own-initiative report by Edward McMILLAN-SCOTT (ADLE, UK) on the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012.

    In 2012 the Committee on Petitions registered 1 986 petitions, mostly referring to the themes of fundamental rights, the environment the internal market, and economic and social crisis.

    1 406 petitions were declared admissible, and of those 853 were forwarded to the Commission for further investigation and 580 petitions were declared inadmissible.

    The highest number of petitions refer to the EU as a whole (27.3 %), followed by Spanish (15.0 %), German (12.5 %) and Italian (8.6 %) cases.

    Fundamental rights: the report noted that fundamental rights remain a key subject of the petitions submitted, notably raising issues related to the rights of persons with disabilities, children’s rights, property rights, the right of free movement, including the portability of social security entitlements, without encountering any form of discrimination on any grounds, the protection of freedom of expression and privacy, freedom of association, and the right of access to documents and information.

    Members called on Member States to apply correctly and respect those rights as set out in the Treaty and called on the Commission to take the necessary measures to oblige non-compliant Member States to close the gap between national laws and the fundamental rights of EU citizens.

    Discrimination: the report drew attention to persisting discrimination against citizens on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, belonging to a minority group, age or sexual orientation. It warned, in particular, that the Roma population across the EU continues to face obstacles to inclusion and called on the Commission to facilitate intergovernmental cooperation in this area, to provide adequate funding for the implementation of national strategies for Roma inclusion.

    Citizens’ rights: Members noted that citizens in the European Union continue to face barriers within the internal market, notably while exercising their freedom of movement as individuals, as providers and consumers of goods and services and as workers, such as, for instance, in the case of Romanian and Bulgarian workers who continue to face restrictions on the labour market in some Member States.

    Members also called on Member States to ensure freedom of movement for all EU citizens and their families, on the basis of the principles of mutual recognition, equality, non-discrimination, dignity and respect for private and family life. They also stated that strengthened cross-border cooperation and harmonisation provides marked benefits for the protection of citizens’ rights and economic stimulation.

    Environment: Members pointed, in particular, to the numerous petitions submitted on waste management, on water, on the possible dangers of nuclear energy and genetic engineering, on protected species, and on the assessment of the impact of projects and activities on the environment and on public health, such as shale gas extraction by means of fracking.

    The Commission is called upon to : adopt a precautionary and preventive approach when assessing projects with a potential negative environmental or public health impact; (ii) strengthen the environmental legislative framework on the environment and combating climate change; (iii) take action to ensure that the Member States understand that water is a public good; (iv) stringently apply precautionary principle in respect of the use of biotechnology and nanotechnology in products that could seriously affect the health of consumers.

    Information and citizen participation:  the report drew attention to the fact that the Eurobarometer of public opinion indicated that only 36 % of EU citizens consider themselves well informed about their rights and only 24 % felt well informed about what they can do if their rights are not respected. They stressed the urgent need for improved access to information and the need to put in place a more practical and visible petitions web portal by the end of 2013.

    Members pledged to make the petition procedure more efficient, transparent, and impartial so that the handling of petitions stands up to judicial review even at a procedural level. They called for the need for more precise, written, procedural rules in relation to the preparation, implementation and evaluation of visits, ensuring on the one hand that all members of a fact-finding visit have the right to present the facts from their point of view while, on the other hand, guaranteeing all Committee Members the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process concerning the conclusions and recommendations to be drawn by the Committee on Petitions.

    Lastly, Members believed that the role and responsibilities of the Petitions Committee would be best performed, and its visibility, efficiency, accountability and transparency best enhanced, by improving its means for bringing issues of importance to European citizens to plenary, and upgrading its abilities to call witnesses, conduct investigations and organise hearings.

procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!?
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Petitions adopted an own-initiative report by Edward McMILLAN-SCOTT (ADLE, UK) on the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012.

    In 2012 the Committee on Petitions registered 1 986 petitions, mostly referring to the themes of fundamental rights, the environment the internal market, and economic and social crisis.

    1 406 petitions were declared admissible, and of those 853 were forwarded to the Commission for further investigation and 580 petitions were declared inadmissible.

    The highest number of petitions refer to the EU as a whole (27.3 %), followed by Spanish (15.0 %), German (12.5 %) and Italian (8.6 %) cases.

    Fundamental rights: the report noted that fundamental rights remain a key subject of the petitions submitted, notably raising issues related to the rights of persons with disabilities, children’s rights, property rights, the right of free movement, including the portability of social security entitlements, without encountering any form of discrimination on any grounds, the protection of freedom of expression and privacy, freedom of association, and the right of access to documents and information.

    Members called on Member States to apply correctly and respect those rights as set out in the Treaty and called on the Commission to take the necessary measures to oblige non-compliant Member States to close the gap between national laws and the fundamental rights of EU citizens.

    Discrimination: the report drew attention to persisting discrimination against citizens on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, belonging to a minority group, age or sexual orientation. It warned, in particular, that the Roma population across the EU continues to face obstacles to inclusion and called on the Commission to facilitate intergovernmental cooperation in this area, to provide adequate funding for the implementation of national strategies for Roma inclusion.

    Citizens’ rights: Members noted that citizens in the European Union continue to face barriers within the internal market, notably while exercising their freedom of movement as individuals, as providers and consumers of goods and services and as workers, such as, for instance, in the case of Romanian and Bulgarian workers who continue to face restrictions on the labour market in some Member States.

    Members also called on Member States to ensure freedom of movement for all EU citizens and their families, on the basis of the principles of mutual recognition, equality, non-discrimination, dignity and respect for private and family life. They also stated that strengthened cross-border cooperation and harmonisation provides marked benefits for the protection of citizens’ rights and economic stimulation.

    Environment: Members pointed, in particular, to the numerous petitions submitted on waste management, on water, on the possible dangers of nuclear energy and genetic engineering, on protected species, and on the assessment of the impact of projects and activities on the environment and on public health, such as shale gas extraction by means of fracking.

    The Commission is called upon to : adopt a precautionary and preventive approach when assessing projects with a potential negative environmental or public health impact; (ii) strengthen the environmental legislative framework on the environment and combating climate change; (iii) take action to ensure that the Member States understand that water is a public good; (iv) stringently apply precautionary principle in respect of the use of biotechnology and nanotechnology in products that could seriously affect the health of consumers.

    Information and citizen participation:  the report drew attention to the fact that the Eurobarometer of public opinion indicated that only 36 % of EU citizens consider themselves well informed about their rights and only 24 % felt well informed about what they can do if their rights are not respected. They stressed the urgent need for improved access to information and the need to put in place a more practical and visible petitions web portal by the end of 2013.

    Members pledged to make the petition procedure more efficient, transparent, and impartial so that the handling of petitions stands up to judicial review even at a procedural level. They called for the need for more precise, written, procedural rules in relation to the preparation, implementation and evaluation of visits, ensuring on the one hand that all members of a fact-finding visit have the right to present the facts from their point of view while, on the other hand, guaranteeing all Committee Members the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process concerning the conclusions and recommendations to be drawn by the Committee on Petitions.

    Lastly, Members believed that the role and responsibilities of the Petitions Committee would be best performed, and its visibility, efficiency, accountability and transparency best enhanced, by improving its means for bringing issues of importance to European citizens to plenary, and upgrading its abilities to call witnesses, conduct investigations and organise hearings.

activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Petitions adopted an own-initiative report by Edward McMILLAN-SCOTT (ADLE, UK) on the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012.

    In 2012 the Committee on Petitions registered 1 986 petitions, mostly referring to the themes of fundamental rights, the environment the internal market, and economic and social crisis.

    1 406 petitions were declared admissible, and of those 853 were forwarded to the Commission for further investigation and 580 petitions were declared inadmissible.

    The highest number of petitions refer to the EU as a whole (27.3 %), followed by Spanish (15.0 %), German (12.5 %) and Italian (8.6 %) cases.

    Fundamental rights: the report noted that fundamental rights remain a key subject of the petitions submitted, notably raising issues related to the rights of persons with disabilities, children’s rights, property rights, the right of free movement, including the portability of social security entitlements, without encountering any form of discrimination on any grounds, the protection of freedom of expression and privacy, freedom of association, and the right of access to documents and information.

    Members called on Member States to apply correctly and respect those rights as set out in the Treaty and called on the Commission to take the necessary measures to oblige non-compliant Member States to close the gap between national laws and the fundamental rights of EU citizens.

    Discrimination: the report drew attention to persisting discrimination against citizens on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, belonging to a minority group, age or sexual orientation. It warned, in particular, that the Roma population across the EU continues to face obstacles to inclusion and called on the Commission to facilitate intergovernmental cooperation in this area, to provide adequate funding for the implementation of national strategies for Roma inclusion.

    Citizens’ rights: Members noted that citizens in the European Union continue to face barriers within the internal market, notably while exercising their freedom of movement as individuals, as providers and consumers of goods and services and as workers, such as, for instance, in the case of Romanian and Bulgarian workers who continue to face restrictions on the labour market in some Member States.

    Members also called on Member States to ensure freedom of movement for all EU citizens and their families, on the basis of the principles of mutual recognition, equality, non-discrimination, dignity and respect for private and family life. They also stated that strengthened cross-border cooperation and harmonisation provides marked benefits for the protection of citizens’ rights and economic stimulation.

    Environment: Members pointed, in particular, to the numerous petitions submitted on waste management, on water, on the possible dangers of nuclear energy and genetic engineering, on protected species, and on the assessment of the impact of projects and activities on the environment and on public health, such as shale gas extraction by means of fracking.

    The Commission is called upon to : adopt a precautionary and preventive approach when assessing projects with a potential negative environmental or public health impact; (ii) strengthen the environmental legislative framework on the environment and combating climate change; (iii) take action to ensure that the Member States understand that water is a public good; (iv) stringently apply precautionary principle in respect of the use of biotechnology and nanotechnology in products that could seriously affect the health of consumers.

    Information and citizen participation:  the report drew attention to the fact that the Eurobarometer of public opinion indicated that only 36 % of EU citizens consider themselves well informed about their rights and only 24 % felt well informed about what they can do if their rights are not respected. They stressed the urgent need for improved access to information and the need to put in place a more practical and visible petitions web portal by the end of 2013.

    Members pledged to make the petition procedure more efficient, transparent, and impartial so that the handling of petitions stands up to judicial review even at a procedural level. They called for the need for more precise, written, procedural rules in relation to the preparation, implementation and evaluation of visits, ensuring on the one hand that all members of a fact-finding visit have the right to present the facts from their point of view while, on the other hand, guaranteeing all Committee Members the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process concerning the conclusions and recommendations to be drawn by the Committee on Petitions.

    Lastly, Members believed that the role and responsibilities of the Petitions Committee would be best performed, and its visibility, efficiency, accountability and transparency best enhanced, by improving its means for bringing issues of importance to European citizens to plenary, and upgrading its abilities to call witnesses, conduct investigations and organise hearings.

activities/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-299&language=EN
activities/4
date
2013-09-24T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0299/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BĂSESCU Elena group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel group: Verts/ALE name: ŽDANOKA Tatjana responsible: True committee: PETI date: 2013-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Petitions rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MCMILLAN-SCOTT Edward
activities/3/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
ŽDANOKA Tatjana
activities/3/date
Old
2013-10-24T00:00:00
New
2013-09-17T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
ŽDANOKA Tatjana
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.637
activities/2
date
2013-07-12T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.637
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/1/date
Old
2013-07-04T00:00:00
New
2013-07-09T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2013-04-08T00:00:00
New
2013-07-04T00:00:00
activities/2/date
Old
2013-09-12T00:00:00
New
2013-10-24T00:00:00
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/1
date
2013-04-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.200 type: Committee draft report title: PE508.200
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/date
Old
2013-06-19T00:00:00
New
2013-04-08T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.200 type: Committee draft report title: PE508.200
activities/1/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee draft report
activities/1/date
Old
2013-04-09T00:00:00
New
2013-04-08T00:00:00
activities/3/date
Old
2013-07-04T00:00:00
New
2013-09-12T00:00:00
activities/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.200
activities/1/date
Old
2013-04-08T00:00:00
New
2013-04-09T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2013-04-08T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE508.200
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/0/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: BĂSESCU Elena
  • group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: BĂSESCU Elena
  • group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel
activities
  • date: 2013-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: PETI date: 2013-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Petitions rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MCMILLAN-SCOTT Edward
  • date: 2013-06-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: PETI date: 2013-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Petitions rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MCMILLAN-SCOTT Edward
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
PETI/7/11542
reference
2013/2013(INI)
title
Annual report of the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 202-p8
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject