BETA

Procedure completed



2013/2025(INI) Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth
Next event: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading 2013/05/21
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó (EPP) LUDVIGSSON Olle (S&D), TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon (ALDE), LAMBERTS Philippe (Verts/ALE), STREJČEK Ivo (ECR), HÄNDEL Thomas (GUE/NGL)
Opinion IMCO
Opinion PETI
Opinion TRAN
Lead committee dossier: ECON/7/11579
Legal Basis RoP 048

Activites

  • 2013/05/21 Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
  • 2013/04/30 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A7-0154/2013 summary
  • 2013/04/24 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/03/11 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/03/06 Amendments tabled in committee
  • 2013/02/05 Committee draft report
  • 2012/12/14 Non-legislative basic document
    • COM(2012)0756 summary
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm', 'title': 'Taxation and Customs Union'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
149 2013/2025(INI)
2013/03/06 ECON 149 amendments...
source: PE-505.997

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/1/date
Old
2013-05-22T00:00:00
New
2013-02-05T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.212 type: Committee draft report title: PE504.212
activities/1/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Committee draft report
activities/6
date
2013-05-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate scheduled
activities/6/date
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00
New
2013-05-21T00:00:00
activities/6/docs/0/title
Old
PE504.212
New
T7-0206/2013
activities/6/docs/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.212
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-206
activities/6/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate scheduled
activities/7/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ (EPP, HU) on the Annual Tax Report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth.

    Whilst noting that taxation policy still remains a national competence, Members consider that this does not exclude the effective coordination of tax arrangements at European level.

    Despite the improvements made in the field of tax policy coordination, EU citizens and enterprises engaged in cross-border activities still face considerable costs, administrative burdens and legal gaps which need to be eradicated as soon as possible in order to enable them to grasp the full benefits of the single market.

    Sustainable fiscal policies: in order to achieve economic balance Members feel it is necessary not only to ensure compliance with sustainable fiscal policies, but also to implement growth-conducive measures such as fighting tax fraud and evasion, shifting taxation towards more growth-friendly tax areas and providing viable tax stimulus for both self-employed persons and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), especially with the aim of promoting innovation. They consider it in the interest of enterprises and citizens to have a clear, predictable, stable and transparent tax environment within the Single Market.

    The report recommends that Member States proceed carefully when altering existing taxes and introducing new taxes, ensuring that this is done in a growth-friendly way. Concerned about the effects that the shift in many Member States towards a more extensive taxation of consumption could have on social inequalities, Members suggest introducing a certain degree of flexibility in the VAT system, where some product categories such as culture or basic needs could be taxed at rates below the standard rate.

    EU-wide tax information system: the report recommends as an eventual solution, the establishment of an EU-wide tax information system serving not to harmonise the different national tax structures, but to facilitate their coordination in a continuous and transparent manner, keeping track of the cuts and increases made within each structure. Members consider that the framework of the European Semester would be a good basis for the functioning of such a system.

    Fighting tax fraud and evasion and abolishing double taxation: noting that an estimated EUR 1 trillion in public revenue is lost every year in the EU because of tax fraud and tax avoidance, the report calls on Member States to take the measures needed to at least halve the tax gap by 2020.

    Member States are asked to:

    • improve substantially their tax surveillance, control and collection capacity;
    • improve their administrative cooperation in the area of direct taxation;
    • implement the Commission proposals for the introduction of a General Anti-Abuse Rule to counteract aggressive tax planning practices and include a clause in their respective double taxation conventions to prevent occurrences of double non-taxation;
    • engage in serious negotiations and complete the procedures for all pending legislative proposals regarding issues of tax fraud, tax evasion, tax avoidance, aggressive tax planning and tax havens;
    • conclude the process of reviewing and extending the scope of the Savings Taxation Directive and, following the report from Parliament, to adopt and implement without delay the Commission’s proposal for a Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud.

    Lastly, in line with solid Commission observations, the report underlines that environmental taxes are among the most growth-friendly in relative terms.

activities/6/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/7/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-154&language=EN
procedure/subject/1
Old
5.05 Sustainable development and growth
New
5.05 Sustainable economic growth
activities/5
date
2013-04-30T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0154/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: LUDVIGSSON Olle group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: STREJČEK Ivo group: GUE/NGL name: HÄNDEL Thomas responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2012-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/4/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate scheduled
activities/6
date
2013-05-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: to strengthen the Single Market by removing cross-border tax obstacles for passenger cars.

BACKGROUND: each year, about 3 million used cars are transferred between Member States, of which up to 1 million are linked to people migrating from one Member State to another. The issues of double or multiple taxation and of potential tax discrimination in case of crossborder transfers of passenger cars are of concern to EU citizens and service providers. This can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU.

In its 2010 EU Citizenship Report, the Commission announced that it would work on solutions to double registration taxes on cars as this can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU and in its Communication 'Removing cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens' the Commission pointed out that, when buying a car in a Member State other than that of their normal residence or when transferring a car to a Member State other than that in which it is registered, EU citizens frequently face excessively complex re-registration procedures and may have to pay registration and/or circulation taxes twice.

It should be noted that, currently, there is no harmonisation at EU level of car registration and circulation taxes. The Commission has taken initiatives and put forward legislative proposals to solve these problems on three occasions, in 1975, in 1998 and in 2005. The 1975 proposal resulted in the adoption of Directive 83/182/EEC, providing tax exemptions for the temporary introduction of a motor-driven road vehicle into a Member State from another Member State.

Despite the jurisprudence of the Court and legislative actions, it has not been possible to overcome the fragmentation of national tax schemes or to fully and systematically remove double taxation and the potential tax discrimination of cars transferred by citizens from one Member State to another.

CONTENT: this Communication aims at clarifying the EU rules on vehicle taxation, explaining rights and obligations of Member States, citizens and businesses.

The Commission considers the abolition of registration taxes and integrating them (in a revenue neutral way) into the circulation taxes as well as the harmonisation and 'greening' of car taxation as the best solution to the remaining problems identified above. However, as the 2005 proposal has so far not been adopted, it is appropriate to explore immediate solutions to the problems identified in this Communication.

Hence, the Commission has identified and proposes to the Member States to apply the following best practices in the short term:

(1) Lack of information: to ensure that taxpayers know their rights and obligations when moving to another Member State, Member States should provide adequate information on their application of registration and circulation taxes on vehicles in cross-border situations, including information on how they have implemented the EU legal framework. To this end, a central contact point for taxpayers should be designated, to which a link can be provided on the website of the Commission.

(2) Double taxation: to avoid double taxation and 'over-taxation' where citizens move a car permanently from one Member State to another, Member States that initially applied a registration tax should as a minimum grant a partial refund of the tax taking into account the depreciation of the car independently from whether or not the Member State of destination provides an exemption from registration tax, if any.

(3) Temporary transfer of a passenger car and rental cars: Member States should make full use of the flexibility offered by Directive 83/182/EEC to apply more liberal arrangements allowing for the temporary use of vehicles in Member States without application of registration and circulation tax. This relates, in particular, to rental cars registered in another Member State, but also to other situations of temporary or occasional use by a resident of a car registered in another Member State.

(4) Fragmentation of the EU car market: Member States should take action to reduce the fragmentation of the EU car market caused by the divergent application by Member States of car registration and circulation taxes. The upcoming Guidelines on financial incentives for clean and energy-efficient vehicles also need to be taken into account.

After having received the opinion of the institutions to which this Communication is addressed, the Commission intends to set up a technical Working Group to discuss the issues above with Member States. As a result of this process, the discussions in the Council on the 2005 proposal could gain a new momentum. Revision of Directive 83/182/EEC could also be envisaged in order to take account of the extensive jurisprudence of the Court and to enhance transparency and legal certainty.

New

PURPOSE: to strengthen the Single Market by removing cross-border tax obstacles for passenger cars.

BACKGROUND: each year, about 3 million used cars are transferred between Member States, of which up to 1 million are linked to people migrating from one Member State to another. The issues of double or multiple taxation and of potential tax discrimination in case of crossborder transfers of passenger cars are of concern to EU citizens and service providers. This can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU.

In its 2010 EU Citizenship Report, the Commission announced that it would work on solutions to double registration taxes on cars as this can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU and in its Communication 'Removing cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens' the Commission pointed out that, when buying a car in a Member State other than that of their normal residence or when transferring a car to a Member State other than that in which it is registered, EU citizens frequently face excessively complex re-registration procedures and may have to pay registration and/or circulation taxes twice.

It should be noted that, currently, there is no harmonisation at EU level of car registration and circulation taxes. The Commission has taken initiatives and put forward legislative proposals to solve these problems on three occasions, in 1975, in 1998 and in 2005. The 1975 proposal resulted in the adoption of Directive 83/182/EEC, providing tax exemptions for the temporary introduction of a motor-driven road vehicle into a Member State from another Member State.

Despite the jurisprudence of the Court and legislative actions, it has not been possible to overcome the fragmentation of national tax schemes or to fully and systematically remove double taxation and the potential tax discrimination of cars transferred by citizens from one Member State to another.

CONTENT: this Communication aims at clarifying the EU rules on vehicle taxation, explaining rights and obligations of Member States, citizens and businesses.

The Commission considers the abolition of registration taxes and integrating them (in a revenue neutral way) into the circulation taxes as well as the harmonisation and 'greening' of car taxation as the best solution to the remaining problems identified above. However, as the 2005 proposal has so far not been adopted, it is appropriate to explore immediate solutions to the problems identified in this Communication.

Hence, the Commission has identified and proposes to the Member States to apply the following best practices in the short term:

(1) Lack of information: to ensure that taxpayers know their rights and obligations when moving to another Member State, Member States should provide adequate information on their application of registration and circulation taxes on vehicles in cross-border situations, including information on how they have implemented the EU legal framework. To this end, a central contact point for taxpayers should be designated, to which a link can be provided on the website of the Commission.

(2) Double taxation: to avoid double taxation and 'over-taxation' where citizens move a car permanently from one Member State to another, Member States that initially applied a registration tax should as a minimum grant a partial refund of the tax taking into account the depreciation of the car independently from whether or not the Member State of destination provides an exemption from registration tax, if any.

(3) Temporary transfer of a passenger car and rental cars: Member States should make full use of the flexibility offered by Directive 83/182/EEC to apply more liberal arrangements allowing for the temporary use of vehicles in Member States without application of registration and circulation tax. This relates, in particular, to rental cars registered in another Member State, but also to other situations of temporary or occasional use by a resident of a car registered in another Member State.

(4) Fragmentation of the EU car market: Member States should take action to reduce the fragmentation of the EU car market caused by the divergent application by Member States of car registration and circulation taxes. The upcoming Guidelines on financial incentives for clean and energy-efficient vehicles also need to be taken into account.

After having received the opinion of the institutions to which this Communication is addressed, the Commission intends to set up a technical Working Group to discuss the issues above with Member States. As a result of this process, the discussions in the Council on the 2005 proposal could gain a new momentum. Revision of Directive 83/182/EEC could also be envisaged in order to take account of the extensive jurisprudence of the Court and to enhance transparency and legal certainty.

activities/5/date
Old
2013-05-20T00:00:00
New
2013-05-21T00:00:00
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner
Old
REHN Olli
New
ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Economic and Financial Affairs
New
Taxation and Customs Union
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm
New
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to strengthen the Single Market by removing cross-border tax obstacles for passenger cars.

    BACKGROUND: each year, about 3 million used cars are transferred between Member States, of which up to 1 million are linked to people migrating from one Member State to another. The issues of double or multiple taxation and of potential tax discrimination in case of crossborder transfers of passenger cars are of concern to EU citizens and service providers. This can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU.

    In its 2010 EU Citizenship Report, the Commission announced that it would work on solutions to double registration taxes on cars as this can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU and in its Communication 'Removing cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens' the Commission pointed out that, when buying a car in a Member State other than that of their normal residence or when transferring a car to a Member State other than that in which it is registered, EU citizens frequently face excessively complex re-registration procedures and may have to pay registration and/or circulation taxes twice.

    It should be noted that, currently, there is no harmonisation at EU level of car registration and circulation taxes. The Commission has taken initiatives and put forward legislative proposals to solve these problems on three occasions, in 1975, in 1998 and in 2005. The 1975 proposal resulted in the adoption of Directive 83/182/EEC, providing tax exemptions for the temporary introduction of a motor-driven road vehicle into a Member State from another Member State.

    Despite the jurisprudence of the Court and legislative actions, it has not been possible to overcome the fragmentation of national tax schemes or to fully and systematically remove double taxation and the potential tax discrimination of cars transferred by citizens from one Member State to another.

    CONTENT: this Communication aims at clarifying the EU rules on vehicle taxation, explaining rights and obligations of Member States, citizens and businesses.

    The Commission considers the abolition of registration taxes and integrating them (in a revenue neutral way) into the circulation taxes as well as the harmonisation and 'greening' of car taxation as the best solution to the remaining problems identified above. However, as the 2005 proposal has so far not been adopted, it is appropriate to explore immediate solutions to the problems identified in this Communication.

    Hence, the Commission has identified and proposes to the Member States to apply the following best practices in the short term:

    (1) Lack of information: to ensure that taxpayers know their rights and obligations when moving to another Member State, Member States should provide adequate information on their application of registration and circulation taxes on vehicles in cross-border situations, including information on how they have implemented the EU legal framework. To this end, a central contact point for taxpayers should be designated, to which a link can be provided on the website of the Commission.

    (2) Double taxation: to avoid double taxation and 'over-taxation' where citizens move a car permanently from one Member State to another, Member States that initially applied a registration tax should as a minimum grant a partial refund of the tax taking into account the depreciation of the car independently from whether or not the Member State of destination provides an exemption from registration tax, if any.

    (3) Temporary transfer of a passenger car and rental cars: Member States should make full use of the flexibility offered by Directive 83/182/EEC to apply more liberal arrangements allowing for the temporary use of vehicles in Member States without application of registration and circulation tax. This relates, in particular, to rental cars registered in another Member State, but also to other situations of temporary or occasional use by a resident of a car registered in another Member State.

    (4) Fragmentation of the EU car market: Member States should take action to reduce the fragmentation of the EU car market caused by the divergent application by Member States of car registration and circulation taxes. The upcoming Guidelines on financial incentives for clean and energy-efficient vehicles also need to be taken into account.

    After having received the opinion of the institutions to which this Communication is addressed, the Commission intends to set up a technical Working Group to discuss the issues above with Member States. As a result of this process, the discussions in the Council on the 2005 proposal could gain a new momentum. Revision of Directive 83/182/EEC could also be envisaged in order to take account of the extensive jurisprudence of the Court and to enhance transparency and legal certainty.

other/0/commissioner
Old
REHN Olli
New
ŠEMETA Algirdas
other/0/dg/title
Old
Economic and Financial Affairs
New
Taxation and Customs Union
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm
New
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm
activities
  • date: 2012-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=756 celexid: CELEX:52012DC0756:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0756 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs Commissioner: REHN Olli
  • date: 2013-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.212 type: Committee draft report title: PE504.212 body: EP type: Committee draft report
  • date: 2013-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE505.997 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE505.997 body: EP type: Amendments tabled in committee
  • date: 2013-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: LUDVIGSSON Olle group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: STREJČEK Ivo group: GUE/NGL name: HÄNDEL Thomas responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2012-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: LUDVIGSSON Olle group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: STREJČEK Ivo group: GUE/NGL name: HÄNDEL Thomas responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2012-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/7/11579
reference
2013/2025(INI)
title
Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject