BETA


2013/2032(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG DAERDEN Frédéric (icon: S&D S&D) PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion REGI
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2013/06/12
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/278/EU on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/023 IT/ Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy).

CONTENT: by means of this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council mobilise the sum of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations from the European Globalisation Fund for the financial year 2013.

This sum is made available to assist Italy in respect of redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA (domestic appliances).

Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 ( EGF Regulation ), Parliament and the Council respond by granting the above-mentioned sum.

To recap, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows for the mobilisation of the Fund through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.

2013/04/22
   CSL - Draft budget approved by Council
2013/04/22
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/04/22
   CSL - Council Meeting
2013/04/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/04/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 615 votes to 76, with 16 abstentions, a resolution approving the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances.

Parliament recalls that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. It agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation .

The Merloni case : Parliament notes that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA .

Parliament welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. It deplores, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 and a half years after the company had been ruled insolvent.

It notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 1 517 workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, guidance for workers over 50 years old, job-search allowances, hiring benefits, contributions to commuting expenses and contributions to the expenses for a change of residence.

In parallel, Parliament asks the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. It calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures.

Members point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" ( EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures ). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged.

Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF : Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF.

It hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved.

Parliament reiterates its position as regards the processing of an application of this kind:

the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment ; the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.

Budget appropriations : Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF.

Lastly, Parliament regrets the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. It calls on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.

Documents
2013/03/25
   EP - Budgetary report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Frédéric DAERDEN (S&D, BE) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances.

Members recall that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. They agree with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation .

The Merloni case : Members note that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA .

Members welcome the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. They deplore, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 years and a half after the company had been ruled insolvent.

They note that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, etc.

In parallel, Members ask the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. They call on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures.

They point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" ( EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures ). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged.

Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF : Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF.

They hope that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved.

Members reiterate their position as regards the processing of an application of this kind:

the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment ; the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.

Insufficient budget appropriations : Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF.

Lastly, Members regret the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. They call on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.

Documents
2013/03/20
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/03/14
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/03/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/02/25
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/02/21
   EP - DAERDEN Frédéric (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2013/02/20
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.

CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.

The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Italy to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows:

Italy: EGF/2012/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy : on 29 December 2011, Italy submitted application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA in Italy. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 4 September 2012.

In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, Italy argues that the crisis had a serious impact on the market for domestic appliances. Available data confirms the significant downturn in the manufacture of domestic appliances, mainly due to the decrease in exports in particular to the United States and Japan. Production of domestic appliances fell in the EU- 27 for three consecutive years (2007 to 2009) compared with the relevant previous year and slightly recovered only in 2010.

To maintain its market share against competition from low labour cost countries such as China and Turkey, Antonio Merloni SpA, the fifth largest manufacturer of appliances in the EU in 2002, changed its sales strategy and in 2006 started selling its products directly through its own brands.

With the outbreak of the global financial and economic crisis, the company got into financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for access to financial credit. The amount of debt and liabilities and the downturn in production resulted in a request submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development for admission to the administration proceedings for large firms in crisis and finally in the cessation of the business activities of Antonio Merloni SpA.

Italy submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers.

The application cites 1 517 redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA during the four month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission has received the confirmation required under the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 that this is the actual number of redundancies effected.

After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met.

On the basis of the application from Italy, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 037 482 , representing 65% of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by Italy.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount of EUR 5 037 482 to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.

The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened.

Source of payment appropriations : appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 037 482 needed for the present application.

2013/02/20
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.

CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.

The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Italy to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows:

Italy: EGF/2012/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy : on 29 December 2011, Italy submitted application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA in Italy. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 4 September 2012.

In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, Italy argues that the crisis had a serious impact on the market for domestic appliances. Available data confirms the significant downturn in the manufacture of domestic appliances, mainly due to the decrease in exports in particular to the United States and Japan. Production of domestic appliances fell in the EU- 27 for three consecutive years (2007 to 2009) compared with the relevant previous year and slightly recovered only in 2010.

To maintain its market share against competition from low labour cost countries such as China and Turkey, Antonio Merloni SpA, the fifth largest manufacturer of appliances in the EU in 2002, changed its sales strategy and in 2006 started selling its products directly through its own brands.

With the outbreak of the global financial and economic crisis, the company got into financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for access to financial credit. The amount of debt and liabilities and the downturn in production resulted in a request submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development for admission to the administration proceedings for large firms in crisis and finally in the cessation of the business activities of Antonio Merloni SpA.

Italy submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers.

The application cites 1 517 redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA during the four month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission has received the confirmation required under the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 that this is the actual number of redundancies effected.

After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met.

On the basis of the application from Italy, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 037 482 , representing 65% of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by Italy.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount of EUR 5 037 482 to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.

The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened.

Source of payment appropriations : appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 037 482 needed for the present application.

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
16 2013/2032(BUD)
2013/03/07 BUDG 16 amendments...
source: PE-506.214

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2013-02-20T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.074
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-506074_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.214
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-506214_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2013-03-25T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0111_EN.html title: A7-0111/2013
summary
events/3
date
2013-03-25T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0111_EN.html title: A7-0111/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-04-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0109_EN.html title: T7-0109/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-04-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0109_EN.html title: T7-0109/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: DAERDEN Frédéric date: 2013-02-21T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
name: PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2013-02-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAERDEN Frédéric group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
name: PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-111&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0111_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-109
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0109_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0090 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52013PC0090:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: ALVARO Alexander responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2013-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2013-03-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: ALVARO Alexander responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2013-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2013-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-111&language=EN type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading title: A7-0111/2013 body: EP type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22766&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-109 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0109/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3235
  • date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2013-06-12T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278 title: Decision 2013/278 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2013:160:TOC title: OJ L 160 12.06.2013, p. 0013
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2013-02-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAERDEN Frédéric group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
name: PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
group: ALDE name: ALVARO Alexander
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2013-02-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3235 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3235*&MEET_DATE=22/04/2013 date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2013-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.074 title: PE506.074 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.214 title: PE506.214 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0090 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=90 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy. CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework. The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Italy to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows: Italy: EGF/2012/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy : on 29 December 2011, Italy submitted application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA in Italy. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 4 September 2012. In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, Italy argues that the crisis had a serious impact on the market for domestic appliances. Available data confirms the significant downturn in the manufacture of domestic appliances, mainly due to the decrease in exports in particular to the United States and Japan. Production of domestic appliances fell in the EU- 27 for three consecutive years (2007 to 2009) compared with the relevant previous year and slightly recovered only in 2010. To maintain its market share against competition from low labour cost countries such as China and Turkey, Antonio Merloni SpA, the fifth largest manufacturer of appliances in the EU in 2002, changed its sales strategy and in 2006 started selling its products directly through its own brands. With the outbreak of the global financial and economic crisis, the company got into financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for access to financial credit. The amount of debt and liabilities and the downturn in production resulted in a request submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development for admission to the administration proceedings for large firms in crisis and finally in the cessation of the business activities of Antonio Merloni SpA. Italy submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers. The application cites 1 517 redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA during the four month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission has received the confirmation required under the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 that this is the actual number of redundancies effected. After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met. On the basis of the application from Italy, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 037 482 , representing 65% of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by Italy. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount of EUR 5 037 482 to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework. The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened. Source of payment appropriations : appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 037 482 needed for the present application.
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-20T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-25T00:00:00 type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-111&language=EN title: A7-0111/2013 summary: The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Frédéric DAERDEN (S&D, BE) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances. Members recall that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. They agree with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation . The Merloni case : Members note that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA . Members welcome the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. They deplore, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 years and a half after the company had been ruled insolvent. They note that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, etc. In parallel, Members ask the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. They call on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures. They point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" ( EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures ). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged. Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF : Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF. They hope that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved. Members reiterate their position as regards the processing of an application of this kind: the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment ; the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds. Insufficient budget appropriations : Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF. Lastly, Members regret the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. They call on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22766&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-109 title: T7-0109/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 615 votes to 76, with 16 abstentions, a resolution approving the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances. Parliament recalls that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. It agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation . The Merloni case : Parliament notes that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA . Parliament welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. It deplores, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 and a half years after the company had been ruled insolvent. It notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 1 517 workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, guidance for workers over 50 years old, job-search allowances, hiring benefits, contributions to commuting expenses and contributions to the expenses for a change of residence. In parallel, Parliament asks the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. It calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures. Members point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" ( EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures ). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged. Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF : Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF. It hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved. Parliament reiterates its position as regards the processing of an application of this kind: the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment ; the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds. Budget appropriations : Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF. Lastly, Parliament regrets the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. It calls on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.
  • date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 type: Draft budget approved by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2013-06-12T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/278/EU on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/023 IT/ Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy). CONTENT: by means of this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council mobilise the sum of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations from the European Globalisation Fund for the financial year 2013. This sum is made available to assist Italy in respect of redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA (domestic appliances). Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 ( EGF Regulation ), Parliament and the Council respond by granting the above-mentioned sum. To recap, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows for the mobilisation of the Fund through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million. docs: title: Decision 2013/278 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278 title: OJ L 160 12.06.2013, p. 0013 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2013:160:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/7/12025
New
  • BUDG/7/12025
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, robotics
  • 4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
  • 8.70.53 2013 budget
New
3.40.06
Electronics, electrotechnical industries, ICT, robotics
4.15.05
Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
8.70.60
Previous annual budgets
procedure/title
Old
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy
New
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0090:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0090:EN
procedure/subject/0
Old
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations
New
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, robotics
procedure/subject/1
Old
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries
New
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1
date
2013-02-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.074 type: Committee draft report title: PE506.074
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de184570fb8127435bdbd6b
New
4f1ac761b819f25efd000083
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: ALDE name: ALVARO Alexander
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: ALVARO Alexander responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2013-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
activities/2/date
Old
2013-03-07T00:00:00
New
2013-03-20T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.214 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE506.214
activities/2/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4
date
2013-03-20T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/4/type
Old
Budgetary text adopted by Parliament
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/7/docs
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278 title: Decision 2013/278
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2013:160:TOC title: OJ L 160 12.06.2013, p. 0013
activities/7/text
  • PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.

    NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/278/EU on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy).

    CONTENT: by means of this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council mobilise the sum of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations from the European Globalisation Fund for the financial year 2013.

    This sum is made available to assist Italy in respect of redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA (domestic appliances).

    Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 (EGF Regulation), Parliament and the Council respond by granting the above-mentioned sum.

    To recap, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows for the mobilisation of the Fund through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.

committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de184570fb8127435bdbd6b
New
4f1ac761b819f25efd000083
committees/0/shadows
  • group: ALDE name: ALVARO Alexander
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/9
date
2013-06-12T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278
title
Decision 2013/278
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/subject/0
Old
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, data-processing, office automation
New
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries
activities/6/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 615 votes to 76, with 16 abstentions, a resolution approving the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances.

    Parliament recalls that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. It agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation.

    The Merloni case: Parliament notes that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA.

    Parliament welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. It deplores, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 and a half years after the company had been ruled insolvent.

    It notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 1 517 workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, guidance for workers over 50 years old, job-search allowances, hiring benefits, contributions to commuting expenses and contributions to the expenses for a change of residence.

    In parallel, Parliament asks the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. It calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures.

    Members point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" (EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged.

    Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF: Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF.

    It hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved.

    Parliament reiterates its position as regards the processing of an application of this kind:

    • the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF,
    • the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors;
    • EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment;
    • the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.

    Budget appropriations: Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF.

    Lastly, Parliament regrets the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. It calls on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.

activities/8
date
2013-04-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
End of procedure in Parliament
activities/6/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22766&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/7
date
2013-04-22T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Council Meeting
council
General Affairs
meeting_id
3235
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-109
activities/6/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0109/2013
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Budgetary text adopted by Parliament
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Frédéric DAERDEN (S&D, BE) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances.

    Members recall that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. They agree with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation.

    The Merloni case: Members note that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA.

    Members welcome the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. They deplore, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 years and a half after the company had been ruled insolvent.

    They note that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, etc.

    In parallel, Members ask the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. They call on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures.

    They point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" (EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged.

    Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF: Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF.

    They hope that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved.

    Members reiterate their position as regards the processing of an application of this kind:

    • the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF,
    • the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors;
    • EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment;
    • the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.

    Insufficient budget appropriations: Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF.

    Lastly, Members regret the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. They call on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-111&language=EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.

    CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

    The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.

    The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Italy to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows:

    Italy:EGF/2012/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy: on 29 December 2011, Italy submitted application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA in Italy. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 4 September 2012.

    In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, Italy argues that the crisis had a serious impact on the market for domestic appliances. Available data confirms the significant downturn in the manufacture of domestic appliances, mainly due to the decrease in exports in particular to the United States and Japan. Production of domestic appliances fell in the EU- 27 for three consecutive years (2007 to 2009) compared with the relevant previous year and slightly recovered only in 2010.

    To maintain its market share against competition from low labour cost countries such as China and Turkey, Antonio Merloni SpA, the fifth largest manufacturer of appliances in the EU in 2002, changed its sales strategy and in 2006 started selling its products directly through its own brands.

    With the outbreak of the global financial and economic crisis, the company got into financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for access to financial credit. The amount of debt and liabilities and the downturn in production resulted in a request submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development for admission to the administration proceedings for large firms in crisis and finally in the cessation of the business activities of Antonio Merloni SpA.

    Italy submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers.

    The application cites 1 517 redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA during the four month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission has received the confirmation required under the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 that this is the actual number of redundancies effected.

    After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met.

    On the basis of the application from Italy, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 037 482, representing 65% of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by Italy.

    IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

    FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount of EUR 5 037 482 to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.

    The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

    By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened.

    Source of payment appropriations: appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 037 482 needed for the present application.

activities/5
date
2013-03-25T00:00:00
docs
type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading title: A7-0111/2013
body
EP
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
activities/4/committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2013-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
activities/4/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/3
date
2013-03-14T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/7/12025
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.214
activities/2
date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE506.214
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
LEWANDOWSKI Janusz
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
LEWANDOWSKI Janusz
activities
  • date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0090 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52013PC0090:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document
  • date: 2013-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.074 type: Committee draft report title: PE506.074 body: EP type: Committee draft report
  • date: 2013-03-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2013-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2013/2032(BUD)
    title
    Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy
    geographical_area
    Italy
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Mobilisation of funds
    type
    BUD - Budgetary procedure
    subject