Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | DAERDEN Frédéric ( S&D) | PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/278/EU on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/023 IT/ Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy).
CONTENT: by means of this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council mobilise the sum of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations from the European Globalisation Fund for the financial year 2013.
This sum is made available to assist Italy in respect of redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA (domestic appliances).
Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 ( EGF Regulation ), Parliament and the Council respond by granting the above-mentioned sum.
To recap, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows for the mobilisation of the Fund through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.
The European Parliament adopted by 615 votes to 76, with 16 abstentions, a resolution approving the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances.
Parliament recalls that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. It agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation .
The Merloni case : Parliament notes that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA .
Parliament welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. It deplores, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 and a half years after the company had been ruled insolvent.
It notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 1 517 workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, guidance for workers over 50 years old, job-search allowances, hiring benefits, contributions to commuting expenses and contributions to the expenses for a change of residence.
In parallel, Parliament asks the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. It calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures.
Members point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" ( EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures ). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged.
Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF : Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF.
It hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved.
Parliament reiterates its position as regards the processing of an application of this kind:
the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment ; the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.
Budget appropriations : Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF.
Lastly, Parliament regrets the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. It calls on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Frédéric DAERDEN (S&D, BE) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for a total amount of EUR 5 037 482 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Italy hit by redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances.
Members recall that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Italy submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF requesting assistance for 1 517 redundancies during the four-month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011, Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF to cover the amount requested. They agree with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation .
The Merloni case : Members note that the production plants of Antonio Merloni SpA, a producer of domestic appliances, were located in the Italian regions of Marche and Umbria, in particular the provinces of Ancona and Perugia. As a result of the global economic crisis, the company experienced financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for accessing financial credit. This application, therefore, covers the 1 517 workers who are unemployed as a result of the closure of Antonio Merloni SpA .
Members welcome the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. They deplore, however, that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 years and a half after the company had been ruled insolvent.
They note that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of workers into employment such as occupational guidance, job-search assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, vocational training and skills upgrade, etc.
In parallel, Members ask the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals. They call on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures.
They point out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" ( EUR 2 000 per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures ). They reiterate that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law. They recommend that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged.
Learn lessons from the implementation of the EGF : Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF.
They hope that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved.
Members reiterate their position as regards the processing of an application of this kind:
the need to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, the fact that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment ; the need to obtain information on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF including information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.
Insufficient budget appropriations : Members welcome the fact that following requests from Parliament, the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 million on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that, therefore, it deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers to the extent possible from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the policy objectives of the EGF.
Lastly, Members regret the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current economic crisis, in addition to those losing their jobs because of changes in global trade patterns and allowing for an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of programme costs for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline. They call on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay.
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.
CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.
The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Italy to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows:
Italy: EGF/2012/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy : on 29 December 2011, Italy submitted application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA in Italy. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 4 September 2012.
In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, Italy argues that the crisis had a serious impact on the market for domestic appliances. Available data confirms the significant downturn in the manufacture of domestic appliances, mainly due to the decrease in exports in particular to the United States and Japan. Production of domestic appliances fell in the EU- 27 for three consecutive years (2007 to 2009) compared with the relevant previous year and slightly recovered only in 2010.
To maintain its market share against competition from low labour cost countries such as China and Turkey, Antonio Merloni SpA, the fifth largest manufacturer of appliances in the EU in 2002, changed its sales strategy and in 2006 started selling its products directly through its own brands.
With the outbreak of the global financial and economic crisis, the company got into financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for access to financial credit. The amount of debt and liabilities and the downturn in production resulted in a request submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development for admission to the administration proceedings for large firms in crisis and finally in the cessation of the business activities of Antonio Merloni SpA.
Italy submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers.
The application cites 1 517 redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA during the four month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission has received the confirmation required under the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 that this is the actual number of redundancies effected.
After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met.
On the basis of the application from Italy, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 037 482 , representing 65% of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by Italy.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount of EUR 5 037 482 to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.
The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened.
Source of payment appropriations : appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 037 482 needed for the present application.
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy.
CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.
The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Italy to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows:
Italy: EGF/2012/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy : on 29 December 2011, Italy submitted application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA in Italy. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 4 September 2012.
In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, Italy argues that the crisis had a serious impact on the market for domestic appliances. Available data confirms the significant downturn in the manufacture of domestic appliances, mainly due to the decrease in exports in particular to the United States and Japan. Production of domestic appliances fell in the EU- 27 for three consecutive years (2007 to 2009) compared with the relevant previous year and slightly recovered only in 2010.
To maintain its market share against competition from low labour cost countries such as China and Turkey, Antonio Merloni SpA, the fifth largest manufacturer of appliances in the EU in 2002, changed its sales strategy and in 2006 started selling its products directly through its own brands.
With the outbreak of the global financial and economic crisis, the company got into financial difficulties, which were further exacerbated by the sudden tightening of conditions for access to financial credit. The amount of debt and liabilities and the downturn in production resulted in a request submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development for admission to the administration proceedings for large firms in crisis and finally in the cessation of the business activities of Antonio Merloni SpA.
Italy submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers.
The application cites 1 517 redundancies in Antonio Merloni SpA during the four month reference period from 23 August 2011 to 23 December 2011. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission has received the confirmation required under the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 that this is the actual number of redundancies effected.
After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met.
On the basis of the application from Italy, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 037 482 , representing 65% of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by Italy.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount of EUR 5 037 482 to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.
The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened.
Source of payment appropriations : appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 037 482 needed for the present application.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2013/278
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 160 12.06.2013, p. 0013
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0109/2013
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A7-0111/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE506.214
- Committee draft report: PE506.074
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2013)0090
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2013)0090
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2013)0090 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE506.074
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE506.214
Amendments | Dossier |
16 |
2013/2032(BUD)
2013/03/07
BUDG
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C C. whereas the Union’s financial assistance to workers made redundant should be dynamic and efficient, namely by ensuring adequate assistance on finding and retaining new jobs, and made available as quickly
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures; recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Welcomes in the coordinated package of personalised services the modul "Guidance for over-50s" intended for older employees, which make 12% of the targeted labour force;
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Welcomes the fact that the contribution to expenses of residence shall only be paid as a one-off contribution upon presentation of proof of the expenditure incurred;
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Takes note that 5 684 000 EUR of the total cost of the package of services amounting to 7 451 972 EUR is devoted to various financial incentives and allowances, including the facilitation of dismissed workers mobility; recommends that a proportionate amount should be dedicated to training-related measures in future mobilisations;
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8f (new) 8f. Points out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" (2 000 EUR per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures), which is an equivalent of the Italian subsistence allowance "CIGS" for the sake of simplification; reiterates therefore that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law; recommends that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged;
Amendment 15 #
8g. Notes the relatively high "Hiring benefit" (5 000 EUR per worker); welcomes the fact that such measures will only be disbursed to employers guaranteeing permanent contracts for targeted workers and expects the Commission to deliver the relevant detailed information regarding the contract conditions for these workers;
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines the importance of good and swift cooperation between the Commission and Member States when preparing applications under the coming new EGF regulation;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 2 2. Notes with regret that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 29 December 2011
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that Antonio Merloni SpA was ruled insolvent already in October 2008 and the sale of its assets and the take over of 700 workers were concluded only in December 2011; notes that the Italian authorities launched their original request for EGF assistance previously in 2009; however, the application had to be re-launched in late 2011 given that the workers were formally dismissed only when the assets had been sold and administrative proceedings concluded;
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Recalls that already in 2008 the Parliament sent a written question to the Commission bringing its attention to the gravity of dismissals in Antonio Merloni SpA and calling for a quick reaction at Union level by means of EGF and of cohesion funds to alleviate the situation of the regions concerned;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Recalls that the EGF has already supported workers dismissed in the sector of manufacturing of domestic appliances (case EGF/2009/010 LT/Snaige);
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the fact that in order to provide workers with
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the fact that the design of the measures was consulted with the social partners and that it made part of social plan "Accordo di Programma" signed by the Ministry of Economic Development and the concerned regions and that the implementation of the EGF support will be monitored by a coordination group;
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 8. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career and the equal access to EGF independently of their type of employment contract and employment relationship; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the level and needs of the dismissed workers but also to the actual business environment;
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Asks the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals;however, welcomes the strict link between the voucher and each worker's agreed pathway of reintegration;
source: PE-506.214
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.074New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-506074_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.214New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-506214_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0090/COM_COM(2013)0090_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-111&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0111_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-109New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0109_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/7/12025New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0278 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in ItalyNew
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of domestic appliances in Italy |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0090:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0090:EN
|
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocationsNew
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, robotics |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industriesNew
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) |
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184570fb8127435bdbd6bNew
4f1ac761b819f25efd000083 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-07T00:00:00New
2013-03-20T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Budgetary text adopted by ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/text |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184570fb8127435bdbd6bNew
4f1ac761b819f25efd000083 |
committees/0/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/9 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, data-processing, office automationNew
3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/6/docs/1 |
|
activities/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-109
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Budgetary text adopted by Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-111&language=EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/7/12025
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.214
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|