Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA Pablo ( PPE) | SEHNALOVÁ Olga ( S&D), CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE), RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE), BIELAN Adam ( ECR), SALVINI Matteo ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | STEINRUCK Jutta ( S&D) | Jean LAMBERT ( Verts/ALE), Patrick LE HYARIC ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | DANTIN Michel ( PPE) | Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
- 2.10 Free movement of goods
- 2.40 Free movement of services, freedom to provide
- 3.20.01 Air transport and air freight
- 3.20.05 Road transport: passengers and freight
- 3.20.07 Combined transport, multimodal transport
- 3.20.08 Urban transport
- 3.30.05 Electronic and mobile communications, personal communications
- 3.30.09 Postal services, parcel delivery services
- 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
- 3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries
- 3.45.05 Business policy, e-commerce, after-sales service, commercial distribution
- 4.60.06 Consumers' economic and legal interests
- 4.60.08 Safety of products and services, product liability
- 5.05 Economic growth
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on an integrated parcel delivery market for the growth of e-commerce in the EU in response to a European Commission Green Paper on the issue.
Parliament underlined that e-commerce is a channel with enormous potential to combat the economic and financial crisis, strengthen the single market, and create economic growth and employment across the European Union. The Commission’s communication on e-commerce and online services of January 2012 and its December 2013 communication ‘ A roadmap for completing the single market for parcel delivery: Build trust in delivery services and encourage online sales ’, identified the delivery of goods purchased online as one of the top five priorities for boosting e-commerce by 2015, and its importance has been reiterated by the Council and by Parliament. The EU e-commerce market grew by over 20% in 2012 and cross-border e-commerce in particular is predicted to multiply by a factor of four.
Integrated delivery services in Europe: a pillar for the Digital Single Market: Parliament recalled that the parcel delivery market is undergoing radical transformations, with new providers entering the market, investment oriented towards innovation, and new services emerging. Therefore, efficient and reliable delivery services are a critical pillar of a real and effective digital single market, having a substantial impact in terms of facilitating e-commerce and building trust between sellers and buyers.
Parliament also noted that delivery concerns (including product returns) and high delivery costs are the top two concerns of consumers in relation to online shopping , contributing to low consumer confidence in cross-border e-commerce. Parliament noted cross-border weaknesses in competition between delivery operators in some Member States and deplored the lack of transparency on the pricing conditions and performance of the services concerned.
Putting consumer interests at the heart of the delivery process: Parliament considered more transparency and better and more readily comparable information on available delivery options, prices and conditions to be paramount for consumers, specifically with respect to the conditions under which consumer orders are shipped and the procedures to follow in case of damage to or loss of goods or delay in their delivery or return. It emphasised that it is necessary to promote measures aimed at ensuring consumer choice at the time of purchase. In this regard, Parliament noted the significant gap between consumer expectations and the availability of convenient, innovative services such as relay points or parcel kiosks, or terminals, round-the-clock services available at any time, track-and-trace solutions, consumer-friendly delivery places and times, or easy return policies. It stressed that reliability of delivery services is crucial and that it is essential to offer efficient systems that guarantee that parcels effectively reach the requested destination within a reasonable timeframe.
The resolution pointed out that the high cost of cross-border delivery or delivery to remote areas or the outermost regions is one of the main reasons for consumer dissatisfaction. More affordable delivery options for consumers and sellers, SMEs included, are imperative to ensure a genuinely single market. Geographical coverage and accessibility to universal service for delivery of parcels in rural and remote areas should be improved.
Parliament also stressed the importance of consumers being properly informed on the applicable legislation in this sector . It proposed the creation of a European network of national problem-solving centres like Solvit would help reassure consumers, as would an alert system like RAPEX, which could warn consumers of sites found to be using fraudulent practices .
It called on the Commission to:
adopt EU guidelines on minimum standards for comparison websites, structured around the core principles of transparency, impartiality, quality, information and user-friendliness; draw up joint delivery service quality indicators, enabling consumers to compare different offers more accurately; provide for a stable and coherent social dimension, where delivery services are subject to compliance with labour rights, terms of employment and remuneration.
Creating a level playing field for SMEs: Parliament emphasised that SMEs seeking business opportunities across the EU are confronted with higher costs, greater complexity and a lack of transparency when it comes to cross-border delivery. Prices for cross-border delivery are three to five times higher than domestic prices. Effective, simple and affordable delivery systems are a key driver of the sustainability of the business models of SMEs and their ability to supply products to customers.
Towards innovative and interoperable solutions for a truly European delivery market: the resolution highlighted the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability and the lack of integration of road, rail and water transport.
In this regard, it called on the Commission to:
continue to propose measures to encourage industry to improve interoperability and accelerate the roll-out of streamlined parcel dispatch and collection processes aimed at reducing costs, increasing economies of scale for delivery operators; explore further the potential of developing European standards to improve integrated tracking systems and to promote the quality, reliability and sustainability of integrated logistic services applied to electronic commerce; create platforms for cooperation and information exchange between delivery operators in order to promptly address the existing gaps in the EU delivery market in terms of innovation, flexibility, stock management, transport, collection and return of parcels, while respecting EU competition law, and discuss the possibility of infrastructure sharing by express and postal mail services to their mutual advantage; work together with business towards the adoption of European standards on addressing and labelling , as well as e-commerce-friendly letter-box standards; improve the interoperability of call-centres dedicated to consumer complaints; explore the possibilities of creating a Pan-European Trustmark for e-Commerce .
Parliament stressed that any new measures taken should be subject to EU data protection legislation.
Monitoring market development and improving regulatory oversight: the resolution noted that that any legislative measures should be carefully assessed in advance in order to avoid impairing the dynamism of the parcel delivery market which should not be hampered by over-regulation.
It called on the Commission to:
monitor the development of the market carefully, in order to identify any areas of potential market failure where further action may become necessary in the future; ensure that the existing regulatory framework is fully transposed, implemented and enforced, with particular attention to the Postal Services Directive, EU competition law, the Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution, and the Consumer Rights Directive, in particular as regards the formal requirements for distance contracts; submit the promised proposal on the introduction of a uniform VAT declaration as soon as possible.
Lastly, Parliament stressed that an optional European contract law for contracts between undertakings and consumers would result in perceptible simplification and encourage more SMEs to send parcels internationally. It therefore called on the Member States to pursue the current negotiations concerning the European Sales Law in a constructive spirit.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the own-initiative report by Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA (EPP, ES) on an integrated parcel delivery market for the growth of e-commerce in the EU.
The report noted that e-commerce is a channel with enormous potential to combat the economic and financial crisis, strengthen the single market, and create economic growth and employment across the European Union. The Commission’s communication on e-commerce and online services of January 2012 identified the delivery of goods purchased online as one of the top five priorities for boosting e-commerce by 2015, and its importance has been reiterated by the Council and by Parliament. The EU e-commerce market grew by over 20% in 2012 and cross-border e-commerce in particular is predicted to multiply by a factor of four.
Integrated delivery services in Europe: a pillar for the Digital Single Market : Members recalled that the parcel delivery market is undergoing radical transformations, with new providers entering the market, investment oriented towards innovation, and new services emerging. Therefore, efficient and reliable delivery services are a critical pillar of a real and effective digital single market , having a substantial impact in terms of facilitating e-commerce and building trust between sellers and buyers. Delivery concerns (including product returns) and high delivery costs are the top two concerns of consumers in relation to online shopping, contributing to low consumer confidence in cross-border e-commerce.
Members noted cross-border weaknesses in competition between delivery operators in some Member States and deplored the lack of transparency on the pricing conditions and performance of the services concerned.
Putting consumer interests at the heart of the delivery process : Members considered more transparency and better and more readily comparable information on available delivery options, prices and conditions to be paramount for consumers, specifically with respect to the conditions under which consumer orders are shipped and the procedures to follow in case of damage to or loss of goods or delay in their delivery or return. They emphasised that it is necessary to promote measures aimed at ensuring consumer choice at the time of purchase.
In addition, the reliability of delivery services is crucial and it is essential to offer efficient systems that guarantee that parcels effectively reach the requested destination within a reasonable timeframe.
The report pointed out that the high cost of cross-border delivery or delivery to remote areas or the outermost regions is one of the main reasons for consumer dissatisfaction. More affordable delivery options for consumers and sellers, SMEs included, are imperative to ensure a genuinely single market. Geographical coverage and accessibility to universal service for delivery of parcels in rural and remote areas should be improved.
Members stressed the importance of consumers being properly informed on the applicable legislation in this sector. They proposed the creation of a European network of national problem-solving centres like Solvit would help reassure consumers, as would an alert system like RAPEX, which could warn consumers of sites found to be using fraudulent practices .
The Commission is called upon to:
adopt EU guidelines on minimum standards for comparison websites , structured around the core principles of transparency, impartiality, quality, information and user-friendliness; draw up joint delivery service quality indicators, enabling consumers to compare different offers more accurately.
Creating a level playing field for SMEs : SMEs seeking business opportunities across the EU are confronted with higher costs, greater complexity and a lack of transparency when it comes to cross-border delivery. Prices for cross-border delivery are three to five times higher than domestic prices. Effective, simple and affordable delivery systems are a key driver of the sustainability of the business models of SMEs and their ability to supply products to customers.
Towards innovative and interoperable solutions for a truly European delivery market : the report highlighted the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability and the lack of integration of road, rail and water transport.
In this regard, it called on the Commission to:
continue to propose measures to encourage industry to improve interoperability and accelerate the roll-out of streamlined parcel dispatch and collection processes aimed at reducing costs, increasing economies of scale for delivery operators; explore further the potential of developing European standards to improve integrated tracking systems and to promote the quality, reliability and sustainability of integrated logistic services applied to electronic commerce; create platforms for cooperation and information exchange between delivery operators in order to promptly address the existing gaps in the EU delivery market in terms of innovation, flexibility, stock management, transport, collection and return of parcels, while respecting EU competition law, and discuss the possibility of infrastructure sharing by express and postal mail services to their mutual advantage; work together with business towards the adoption of European standards on addressing and labelling, as well as e-commerce-friendly letter-box standards ; improve the interoperability of call-centres dedicated to consumer complaints; explore the possibilities of creating a Pan-European Trustmark for e-Commerce,
Monitoring market development and improving regulatory oversight : the report noted that that any legislative measures should be carefully assessed in advance in order to avoid impairing the dynamism of the parcel delivery market which should not be hampered by over-regulation. The Commission is called upon to:
monitor the development of the market carefully, in order to identify any areas of potential market failure where further action may become necessary in the future; ensure that the existing regulatory framework is fully transposed , implemented and enforced, with particular attention to the Postal Services Directive, EU competition law, the Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution, and the Consumer Rights Directive, in particular as regards the formal requirements for distance contracts; submit the promised proposal on the introduction of a uniform VAT declaration as soon as possible;
Lastly, Members stressed that an optional European contract law for contracts between undertakings and consumers would result in perceptible simplification and encourage more SMEs to send parcels internationally.
PURPOSE: to launch a consultation on the integrated parcel delivery market for the growth of e-commerce in the EU (Commission Green Paper).
BACKGROUND: according to estimations, the EU parcel market was estimated to be worth €42.4 billion in 2008 .
Over the last 5 years, and due to the growth of e-commerce, the business to consumer segment of the parcel and packet markets has grown rapidly. Estimates of today's volumes indicate that this segment now represents between 20 % and 40% of total volumes in more mature e-commerce markets such as the United Kingdom. In the EU-27, only 9% of EU consumers and 18% of EU retailers use cross-border e-commerce. Cross-border delivery is considered to be an obstacle by 57% of retailers10, while 46.7% of consumers declare they worry about the delivery in cross-border transactions.
The Commission's Communication on ecommerce and online services identifies the delivery of goods purchased online as one of the top five priorities to boost e-commerce by 2015 and its importance has been reiterated by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament in its resolution of 21 September 2010. Delivery is indeed critical as it has a substantial impact on facilitating e-commerce trade and is a key element for building trust between sellers and buyers.
A more appropriate design of the delivery chain for e-commerce in the EU would also have positive implications for a number of policy areas such as cohesion, employment, innovation, environment, competitiveness of European industry to promote investment in a European delivery network which faces intense competition in the international environment.
CONTENT: this Green Paper examines how the e-commerce and delivery markets in Europe are evolving, explores what is required for the creation of a Single Market for delivery, analyses the key challenges for the different actors, and highlights the opportunities for improving the delivery process to the benefits of citizens and businesses, in particular SMEs.
Based on an analysis of the existing regulatory and institutional framework, three main issues are considered instrumental in creating an integrated EU parcel delivery market :
(1) Convenience: greater convenience and transparency for consumers . In this context, the Green Paper focuses on the following points:
greater consideration from the consumers’ point of view through the provisions of information : (i) on delivery options and modalities; (ii) on the quality/performance of delivery (e.g. performance indicators on the speed of delivery, the geographic coverage of the delivery operator, delays, damaged or lost items; (iii) trust labels (e.g. a certificate given by an industry association that the delivery process of an operator can be trusted); better service and more safeguards : the Green Paper examines the need for a new universal service obligation to address the ubiquity, affordability and quality of parcel delivery services as well as ways to reply to concerns and consumer complaints as regards deliveries.
(2) Controlling costs : consumers and e-retailers consider generally current price levels to be too high. By contrast, operators argue that they already work with low margins and that sustainable prices are necessary to ensure their long-term economic viability. There is a need to identify solutions to limit the impact on delivery prices of crossing border and to close the existing gap between the domestic and the cross-border price, where it is not objectively justified.
Consumers often perceive the choice of delivery solutions to be very limited due to the lack of transparency of the market, and the actual state – or perceived state – of competition on the market. Specific ex ante regulatory solutions could be envisaged to the benefit of consumers by making delivery markets competitive on a sustainable basis .
(3) Improving interoperability along the delivery chain : more transparency and better partnerships are required in order to address the need of eretailers, to better understand what constitutes best logistic and delivery practices and to effectively communicate the delivery options that are available to consumers. Successful partnership within and between these two sectors will be decisive for the future of ecommerce.
The Commission services have already launched a number of demonstration actions aiming to improve the competitiveness of the transport and logistics sector in Europe, through the smart use of information technologies and connect, in particular smaller enterprises to digital transport and logistics value chains.
All interested parties are invited to submit their views in response to the consultation at the latest by 15 February 2013 . As a follow up to this Green Paper and on the basis of the responses received, the Commission will identify, in spring 2013, the set of actions to be taken to complete the single market for parcels.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)414
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0067/2014
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0024/2014
- Committee opinion: PE514.874
- Committee opinion: PE514.642
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE519.457
- Committee draft report: PE516.736
- Contribution: COM(2012)0698
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0698
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE516.736
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE519.457
- Committee opinion: PE514.642
- Committee opinion: PE514.874
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)414
- Contribution: COM(2012)0698
Amendments | Dossier |
140 |
2013/2043(INI)
2013/09/23
TRAN
55 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes the limited cross-border development of e-commerce by SMEs; encourages collaboration between SMEs to introduce shared online platforms and negotiate more advantageous delivery prices;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes the limited cross-border
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the e-retailer places the order with the deliverer, and should therefore take responsibility for information on the conditions for parcel delivery and their traceability; calls in this respect for proper implementation of Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights, and in particular the clauses therein relating to distance contracts;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the e-retailer places the order with the deliverer, and should therefore take responsibility for information on the conditions for parcel delivery and their traceability; recalls in this regard the enforcement of the requirements introduced for traders related to distant selling by the Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU which lays down the responsibilities of the e-retailers.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the e-retailer places the order with the deliverer, and should therefore take responsibility for information on the working conditions, conditions for parcel delivery, their carbon footprint and their traceability;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the e-retailer places the order with the deliverer, and should therefore take responsibility for information on the conditions for parcel delivery
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the formal requirements for distance contracts as specified in article 8 of the 2011/83/EU Directive on consumer rights and endorses the enforcement of these provisions as a means to formalize the responsibility of e-retailers;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that consumers like to have a choice between different delivery options, and that online retailers should therefore endeavour to offer a variety of options, including in the case of cross-border sales, and that delivery companies and postal operators should strive to offer as wide as possible a range of services and price rates for deliveries within the EU, including tracking and returns options, and different point of delivery possibilities;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that e-commerce is a fast- growing, job-creating sector, and one of the main reasons for its success is the quality of delivery services, that should therefore strive to implement innovative improvements to delivery options (e.g. parcel collection points at transport hubs, IT notification) and optimize and implement green logistic chains;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability and the lack of integration of road, rail and water transport; calls on the Commission to introduce common labelling and traceability standards;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability; calls on the Commission to introduce common labelling
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fragmentation of the European postal sector into national networks with poor interoperability; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the importance of legal certainty for ensuring consumer confidence; stresses, in this connection, the importance of consumers being properly informed on the applicable legislation;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes cross-border weaknesses in competition between delivery operators in some Member States, and deplores the lack of transparency on the pricing conditions and performance of the services concerned; believes, in particular, that tools must be put in place to provide information on offers by all European delivery operators;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers the role of the regulatory authorities to be crucial in ensuring the proper implementation of legislation on consumer protection, quality of delivery services and competition. Stresses, therefore, the need to provide them with the financial, material and human resources they need to effectively perform their tasks;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the development of labels and certificates for delivery services that can be recognised at European level, thus encouraging companies to improve their environmental, social and economic performance and giving consumers confidence in the reliability as well as the social and environmental soundness of the services offered;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the development of labels and certificates for delivery services that can be recognised at European level and issued by the competent authorities, thus encouraging companies to improve their performance and giving consumers confidence in the
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses the need to develop common rules and frameworks for ordering parcels electronically and to create a European platform for providing and exchanging information on consumers' rights;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Draws attention to the importance of developing the whole circuit of services relating to parcel delivery, and in particular electronic billing and payments services, when growing e-commerce; points out that under Directive 2010/45/EU on the common system of value added tax as regards the rules on invoicing, the same rate of VAT will be applied to both paper and electronic invoices as from 1 January 2013;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that certification of e-commerce sites will help increase consumer confidence in e-commerce and hence in the parcel delivery process;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Demands that the policies concerned take into account the impact of deliveries of e-commerce parcels on urban traffic and atmospheric pollution, stemming from the sharp increase in the number of individual deliveries;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes that the development of these labels will increase consumers’ confidence in online commerce, induce them to choose more sustainable methods of delivery and encourage online traders and delivery companies to take a responsible and sustainable approach to their distribution chains, thereby stimulating economic growth and job creation;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Member States to ensure that workers in the delivery sector enjoy good social conditions, since delivery companies are subject to delivery deadline and profitability pressures that can tempt them to resort to precarious employment practices and unacceptable working conditions;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that the relevance of a revision of Directive 2008/6/EC to meet the present challenges can only be assessed after analysis of the evaluation report on its implementation and in light of the efforts made by stakeholders
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that the relevance of a revision of Directive 2008/6/EC to meet the present challenges can only be assessed after analysis of the evaluation report on its implementation and in light of the efforts made by stakeholders
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Encourages the development of after 18h00 and weekend deliveries for private individuals, leading to few delayed deliveries and stolen or damaged left parcels;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that the parcel delivery sector is highly labour-intensive, with working conditions characterized by insecure contracts, long working hours, too high work load (insufficient time to provide good quality), stressful working conditions, low pay and few opportunities to access on-going vocational training;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the protection of an individual's personal data, and data protection in general, is of paramount importance and that any new measures taken should be subject to EU data protection legislation and in particular to Directive 95/46/EC;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. (new) Recalls the objective of reducing the number of fatal accidents on European roads by half which the European Parliament set in its Resolution of 27 September 2011 on road safety 2011-2020; points out that, according to Commission data, tiredness is the main cause of between 10% and 20% of traffic accidents; notes, moreover, the growth in the use of vehicles of up to 3.5 tonnes for commercial purposes over the past decade; proposes, therefore, that the rules on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 should concern all types of vehicles used for delivery services;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the particular need to implement green logistics, as the customer demands increasingly call for the quick delivery of small quantities at reasonable prices that should not lead to developments that contradict the EU's social or environmental goals;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Member States to comply with the drivers working times and rest times laid down in law, with the legislation establishing working times in the road haulage sector and with the need to enforce EU standards in the field of health and safety at work, including behind the wheel, for all delivery workers;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses that ensuring responsible employment conditions in the delivery sector is essential prerequisite for high- quality delivery services as well as social dimension of an integrated parcel delivery market
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission to hold discussions with the interested parties on the issue of the ‘last mile’ in urban areas, taking into account factors relating to the environment, methods of transport, town planning, quality and choice of services and competition rules.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Calls on the Member States to ensure that fair and decent working and pay conditions throughout the delivery sector are guaranteed, and to combat undeclared employment as well as abuses of self- employed working status
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Considers that an EU-wide e- commerce trust mark ensuring quality, reliability, environmental and social sustainability and adequate working conditions for integrated delivery services could help improve consumer confidence in the online marketplace, stimulate e- retailers and parcel firms to take more responsibility in the delivery chain therefore contributing to sound economic growth and employment creation;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 e (new) 7e. Stresses the need that trust mark is to be granted by competent national authorities to delivery operators who adhere to identified codes of conduct with respect to training and working conditions and environmental aspects; emphasizes that such a trust mark should cover whole delivery chain of operators as well as subcontractors
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 f (new) 7f. Notes that e-retailers who would like to display the trust mark to their customers would have to use accredited delivery operators only
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 g (new) 7g. Calls on the Commission to develop guidelines, technical standards and pre- conditions that should apply to EU-wide e-commerce trust mark, including requirements for procedures for complaints handling and dispute resolution, fair and decent working and pay conditions and environmental aspects,
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 h (new) 7h. Notes that so called „free delivery service" often means that the cost of delivery is not invoiced explicitly but is included in the final price of the product; emphasizes the need for sustainable and transparent tariffs provided to consumer that reflect the true costs of service
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 i (new) 7i. Is concerned at the fact that delivery operators often outsource delivery work to subcontractors and in some cases even sub-subcontractors; emphasizes that this might contribute to the increased working pressure notes that the competitive pressure and the large share of self- employed delivery workers can also to a large extent influence the quality of delivery
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers ensuring reasonable employment conditions in the parcel distribution sector to be a prerequisite for the provision of high-quality delivery services, and essential to the social aspects of an integrated parcel delivery market, and therefore calls on the Member States to guarantee fair and decent working conditions and wages in this sector in order to prevent undeclared work and abuse and hence improve social rights and ensure fair competition between operators;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 j (new) 7j. Calls on the Member States to increase controls of subcontractors in order to comply with the legal and collective terms of employment
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 k (new) 7k. Highlights that there are delivery performance gaps deriving from delivery workers failing to comply with delivery instructions due to lack of training, calls on the delivery operators to support staff training and education
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 l (new) 7l. Considers that, to achieve an integrated parcel delivery market, high- quality jobs are needed with a sound, well-integrated social dimension allowing the redefinition of existing skills and reskilling
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 m (new) 7m. criticises the Green Paper's lack of focus on issues of education and training opportunities, adequate salaries, and the involvement of the social partners; notes that any internal market regulation must take into account the social dimension, especially in terms of employment models based on self-employment, temporary employment and part-time employment;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 n (new) 7n. Emphasizes the necessity for the Member States to comply with the applicable driver's working hours and rest periods, the legally permissible working hours and the crediting of all with the work associated activities as working time, as well as the necessity to monitor the compliance with European standards of occupational health and safety protection, including the conditions inside vehicles for all persons responsible for the delivery
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 o (new) 7o. Stresses the need to improve geographical coverage and accessibility to universal service for delivery of parcels in rural and remote areas.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that companies operating in the parcel delivery sector often sub-contract, which can, for no justifiable reason, lead to an increase in competitive pressure, not least by swelling numbers of self-employed workers for cost-cutting motives, to the detriment of safety, social security cover and, ultimately, quality of service;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses that the parcel delivery sector is one in which working conditions are often typified by precarious contracts, long working hours, excessive workloads and low wages;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Believes that the development of cross-border online trade also depends on customer confidence, and that the creation of a European network of national problem-solving centres like Solvit would help reassure consumers, as would an alert system like RAPEX, which could warn consumers of sites found to be using fraudulent practices;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes the limited cross-border development of e-commerce by SMEs; encourages collaboration between SMEs as well as via their representative bodies to negotiate more advantageous delivery prices;
source: PE-516.846
2013/10/11
EMPL
25 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need to maintain the prescribed driving and resting times and the working hours permitted by law
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is critical of the extremely high amount of outsourcing which delivery firms undertake
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls as a matter of principle, where parcel service operators deliver parcels themselves, for this to take place in accordance with working conditions agreed by collective bargaining or, where delivery is sub-contracted, in accordance with the principle of equal pay for equal work; calls on the Member States to introduce and strengthen laws on total corporate liability;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Expects the Member States to
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need to maintain the prescribed driving and resting times and the working hours permitted by law, to reckon all tasks connected with the activity as working time and to monitor compliance with European standards on the protection of health and safety at work
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Expects the Member States to
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Expects the
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Expects
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – point 1 (new) (1) Stresses the importance of online trading and its associated parcel services for SMEs, start-ups and their employees;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses also that the slowdown in the growth of cross-border online trading cannot be blamed solely on shortcomings in delivery but is rather the result of uncertainties about consumer rights and rights protection in cross-border online trade; therefore calls on the Commission to take action in the field of consumer protection so as to further facilitate online trade;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 a. stresses the need to create an European e-Commerce Trustmark ensuring quality, reliability, environmental and social sustainability and adequate working conditions for integrated delivery services that could help improve consumer confidence in e- commerce, stimulate e-retailers and parcel firms to take more responsibility in the delivery chain, boost transparency as well as legal certainty for both consumers and businesses and increase competitive advantage of business, especially SMES, therefore contributing to sound economic growth and employment creation;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need to m
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to simplifying cross-border parcel delivery for consumers and undertakings by enhancing the transparency of the delivery process, enabling tracking and setting quality standards to create a common European delivery market;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is aware that online trade is an important growth market
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is aware that online trade is a growth market; draws attention to the entrepreneurial and financial pressure on suppliers resulting from investment and measures to adapt to the requirements of online trade as it expands; takes the view that
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is aware that online trade is a growth market; draws attention to the entrepreneurial and financial pressure on suppliers resulting from investment and measures to adapt to the requirements of online trade as it expands; takes the view that in the long run employees
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the key to appropriate transformation and adaptation measures lies in employee training; regards it as the employer’s task to acquaint employees properly with new technologies such as IT and tracking applications and GPS systems, which can offer support as online delivery becomes more widespread and complex; in the case of temporary contracts, the agency supplying the staff must give them adequate preparation and training;
source: PE-521.543
2013/10/14
IMCO
60 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which states that the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, which should govern, inter alia, all work-related areas, including labour rights, terms of employment and remuneration;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of increasing consumer confidence in the delivery process; considers more transparency and better information on available delivery options, prices and conditions to be paramount for consumers, specifically with respect to the conditions under which consumer orders are shipped and the procedures to follow in case of
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of increasing consumer confidence in the delivery process; considers more transparency and better and more readily comparable information on available delivery options, prices and conditions to be paramount for consumers, specifically with respect to the conditions under which consumer orders are shipped and the procedures to follow in case of delay or damage to or loss of goods;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that it is necessary to promote measures aimed at ensuring consumer choice at the time of purchase; notes the significant gap between consumer expectations and the availability of convenient, innovative services such as relay points or parcel kiosks, track-and- trace solutions, consumer-friendly delivery places and times, or easy return policies;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that it is necessary to promote measures aimed at ensuring consumer choice at the time of purchase; notes the significant gap between consumer expectations and the availability of convenient, innovative services such as relay points or parcel kiosks or terminals, round-the-clock services available at any time, track-and-
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the high cost of cross- border delivery or delivery to remote areas or the outermost regions is one of the main reasons for consumer dissatisfaction; stresses that more affordable delivery options for consumers and
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need to improve geographical coverage and accessibility to universal service for delivery of parcels in rural and remote areas;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibilities of creating a European Trustmark for e-commerce, which would guarantee that a business operating online fully respects EU law; it should be simple and well-structured, and should be rich with content that provides added value for the whole chain of e-commerce, thus boosting confidence and transparency, as well as legal certainty for both consumers and businesses, and should provide information in a form compliant with the existing, non-legally binding W3C standards, in the interests of people with disabilities; Stresses, furthermore, the need for an integrated approach in order to improve consumer confidence as regards accessing legal cross border online services;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the industry and consumer organisations, to draw up joint delivery service quality indicators, enabling consumers to compare different offers more accurately;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that increasing numbers of consumers use comparison websites to compare prices, features or terms of delivery of products and services, especially with regard to e-commerce; stresses that comparison websites do not always provide consumers with transparent, accurate and complete information; welcomes the work already done by the Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue on Comparison Tools;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas e-commerce is a channel with enormous potential to combat the economic and financial crisis, strengthen the single market, and create economic growth and employment across the European Union; whereas the Commission’s communication on e- commerce and online services of January 2012 identifies the delivery of goods purchased online as one of the top five priorities for boosting e-commerce by 2015, and its importance has been reiterated by the Council and by Parliament;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses in particular that comparison websites need to be transparent, reliable, and managed in an operationally independent manner in order to be beneficial for both businesses, notably SME, and consumers and to ensure that consumers are provided with transparent and accurate information;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the vital role of SMEs in creating growth and employment, in particular youth employment; stresses that delivery services are of extreme importance for European SMEs, and that an integrated competitive delivery market ensuring affordable prices and different delivery options
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the vital role of SMEs in creating growth and employment, in particular youth employment; stresses that delivery services are of extreme importance for European SMEs, and that an integrated competitive delivery market ensuring different delivery options at affordable prices is a precondition for accessing new markets and reaching more consumers within the EU; recommends, therefore, appropriate adjustments to the regulatory framework to give European consumers freedom of choice, practicality, transparency and – from the point of view of competition – greater social and economic advantages and access to a wider range of goods and services, while SMEs acquire ample opportunities to provide goods and services which are innovative, of quality and consumer- friendly on the European internal on-line market as a whole, so as to strengthen their position and enable them to remain competitive in the global economy;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the vital role of SMEs in creating growth and employment, in particular youth employment; stresses that delivery services are of extreme
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the vital role of SMEs in creating growth, innovation, and employment, in particular youth employment; stresses that delivery services are of extreme importance for European SMEs, and that an integrated competitive delivery market ensuring different delivery and logistic support options at affordable prices is a precondition for accessing new markets and reaching more consumers within the EU;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Emphasises that
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Is concerned about the
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 a (new) Ensuring responsible employment conditions in the European delivery sector
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that the parcel delivery sector is highly labour-intensive, with working conditions characterized by insecure contracts, long working hours, too high work load (insufficient time to provide good quality), stressful working conditions, low pay and few opportunities to access on-going vocational training;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU e-commerce market grew by over 20% in 2012; whereas cross- border e-commerce in particular is predicted to multiply by a factor of four; whereas the parcel delivery market is undergoing radical transformations, with new providers entering the market, investment oriented towards innovation, and new services emerging;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Stresses that ensuring responsible employment conditions in the delivery sector is an essential prerequisite for high-quality delivery services as well as social dimension of an integrated parcel delivery market;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Calls on the Member States to ensure that fair and decent working and pay conditions throughout the delivery sector are guaranteed, and to combat undeclared employment as well abuses of self- employed working status;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Is concerned at the fact that delivery operators often outsource delivery work to subcontractors and in some cases even sub-subcontractors; emphasizes that this might contribute to the increased working pressure notes that the competitive pressure and the large share of self- employed delivery workers can also to a large extent influence the quality of delivery;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 e (new) 9e. Calls on the Member States to increase controls of subcontractors in order to comply with the legal and collective terms of employment;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 f (new) 9f. Considers that, to achieve an integrated parcel delivery market, high- quality jobs are needed with a sound, well-integrated social dimension allowing the redefinition of existing skills and reskilling;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 g (new) 9g. Criticises the Green Paper's lack of focus on issues of education and training opportunities, adequate salaries, and the involvement of the social partners; notes that any internal market regulation must take into account the social dimension, especially in terms of employment models based on self-employment, temporary employment and part-time employment;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 h (new) 9h. Highlights that there are delivery performance gaps deriving from delivery workers failing to comply with delivery instructions due to lack of training, calls on the delivery operators to support staff training and education;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to propose the necessary measures to encourage industry to improve interoperability and accelerate the roll-out of streamlined processes subject to compliance with labour rights, terms of employment and remuneration and social and environmental standards and aimed at reducing delivery costs, increasing the availability and quality of delivery services, and offering affordable flexible shipping rates to consumers and businesses alike;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to propose the necessary measures to encourage industry to improve interoperability and accelerate the roll-out of streamlined processes aimed at reducing costs, increasing economies of scale for delivery operators, encouraging the grouping of small shipments and hence quantity discounts for small traders, increasing the availability and quality of delivery services, and offering affordable flexible shipping rates to consumers and businesses alike;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas large online retail market operators in particular are causing a massive price squeeze in the logistics sector, to the obvious detriment of working conditions for delivery operators in a number of Member States;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to propose the necessary measures to encourage industry to improve interoperability and accelerate the roll-out of streamlined parcel sending and collection processes aimed at reducing costs, increasing the availability and quality of delivery services, and offering affordable flexible shipping rates to consumers and businesses alike;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that in this regard collaboration within the industry on interoperable cross-border track-and-trace systems is of particular importance; encourages the Commission to explore further the potential of developing European standards and of using open application programming interfaces to enable integrated tracking systems and to promote the quality, reliability and sustainability of integrated logistic services applied to electronic commerce;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that in this regard collaboration within the industry on interoperable cross-border track-and-trace systems is of particular importance; encourages the Commission to explore further the potential of developing European standards
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that track-and-trace should be part of a standard set of information about the order provided by e-retailer to consumer;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Points out that by all the stakeholders involved in cross-border parcel delivery, the parcel needs to be identified by the same track-and-trace code from the submission of parcel to its delivery to consumer;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights that easier collection and return solutions
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to give the encouragement required for the purpose of setting up comparison websites focusing on the products and services offered by parcel delivery firms and covering the products available, prices, delivery times, and all relevant features of the delivery service, with versions in several languages so as to make for transparency and reliability and strengthen consumer protection;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to work together with business towards the adoption of European standards on addressing and labelling, as well as e- commerce-friendly letter-box standards;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas in order to overcome this situation it is vital to boost consumers’ confidence in delivery operators and services, trust in the market and knowledge of their rights and obligations, by ensuring more information and greater transparency regarding the conditions of delivery;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the need to create an European e-Commerce Trustmark ensuring quality, reliability, environmental and social sustainability and adequate working conditions for integrated delivery services that could help improve consumer confidence in e- commerce, stimulate e-retailers and parcel firms to take more responsibility in the delivery chain, boost transparency as well as legal certainty for both consumers and businesses and increase competitive advantage of business, especially SMES, therefore contributing to sound economic growth and employment creation;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls on the Commission to assess the appropriate legal framework and scale of a pan European E-commerce Trustmark by considering whether such a the accreditation and award of European e-Commerce Trustmark should be carried out by an EU institution or by MS institutions ensure accreditation at national level; Stresses the need that European e-Commerce Trustmark is to be granted to delivery operators who adhere to identified codes of conduct and who comply with obligations related to training and working conditions and environmental protection; emphasizes that such a trust mark should cover whole delivery chain of operators as well as subcontractors;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Notes that e-retailers who would like to display European e-Commerce Trustmark on a website as electronic labels would have to use accredited delivery operators only with the purpose to signal adherence to a set of rules ensured by European e-Commerce Trustmark;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 d (new) 14d. Calls on the Commission to develop guidelines, technical standards and pre- conditions that should apply to European e-Commerce Trustmark; stresses that it is necessary for an European e-Commerce Trustmark in order to be effective to be based on a set of minimum features dealing with transparent provisions for consumer protection and information, as well as requirements for procedures for complaints handling and dispute resolution;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the dynamic nature of the parcel delivery market, with new services and operators emerging rapidly; notes that innovative solutions responding to the needs of e-retailers and customers are likely to become a key differentiator for competition;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the dynamic nature of the parcel delivery market, with new services and operators emerging rapidly; notes that innovative solutions responding to the needs of e-retailers and customers are likely to become a key differentiator for competition; calls therefore for the market to be allowed to continue to grow of its own accord and not to be hampered by over-regulation; believes that it is of utmost importance to monitor the development of the market carefully, in order to identify any areas of potential
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that the existing regulatory framework is fully transposed, implemented and enforced, with particular attention to the Postal Services Directive, EU competition law, the Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Consumer Rights Directive;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Highlights that the effective enforcement of the legal framework also depends on the surveillance by national regulators of the legal obligations of postal operators, in particular regarding the universal service obligation under Directive 97/67/EC;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Observes that complicated provisions concerning Value Added Tax are a significant obstacle to small businesses trading across borders; calls on the Commission to submit the promised proposal on the introduction of a uniform VAT declaration as soon as possible;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas in order to overcome this situation it is vital to boost consumers’ confidence in delivery, trust in the market and knowledge of their rights, by ensuring more information, greater ease of understanding, and greater transparency regarding the conditions of delivery;-{}-
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Stresses that an optional European contract law for contracts between undertakings and consumers would result in perceptible simplification and encourage more SMEs to send parcels internationally; calls on the Member States to pursue the current negotiations concerning the European Sales Law in a constructive spirit;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that accessible, affordable and high-quality delivery services are an essential element in the online purchasing of goods and must be promoted by ensuring free and fair competition subject to compliance with labour rights, terms of employment and remuneration and social and environmental standards; notes, however, that many consumers are reluctant to buy online, especially cross- border, because of uncertainties relating to final delivery, delivery costs or reliability;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that accessible, affordable, efficient, and high-quality delivery services are an essential element in the online purchasing of goods and must be promoted by ensuring free and fair competition; notes, however, that many consumers are reluctant to buy online, especially cross- border, because of uncertainties relating to the delivery options available, final delivery, delivery costs or reliability;
source: PE-519.457
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.736New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-516736_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.457New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-519457_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.642&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-514642_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.874&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-514874_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0024&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0024_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0067New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0067_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/7/12134New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0698:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0698:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0698/COM_COM(2012)0698_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0698/COM_COM(2012)0698_EN.pdf |
procedure/subject/9 |
Old
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises SMEs, craft industriesNew
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-02-04T00:00:00New
2013-03-14T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees/2/committee |
Old
IMCONew
EMPL |
activities/2/committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionNew
Employment and Social Affairs |
activities/2/committees/2/date |
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00New
2013-03-13T00:00:00 |
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de182e80fb8127435bdbb50New
4f1adb9bb819f207b30000d3 |
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA PabloNew
STEINRUCK Jutta |
activities/2/committees/2/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
activities/2/committees/2/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/4/committee |
Old
TRANNew
IMCO |
activities/2/committees/4/committee_full |
Old
Transport and TourismNew
Internal Market and Consumer Protection |
activities/2/committees/4/date |
Old
2013-01-21T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845a0fb8127435bdbd6fNew
4f1ac5f8b819f25efd000011 |
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DANTIN MichelNew
ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA Pablo |
activities/2/committees/4/responsible |
Old
New
True |
activities/2/committees/4/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/8/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
activities/2/committees/8/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
activities/2/committees/8/date |
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00New
2013-01-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2/committees/8/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
PPE |
activities/2/committees/8/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188ae0fb8127435bdc39aNew
4f1ac76ab819f25efd000087 |
activities/2/committees/8/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
STEINRUCK JuttaNew
DANTIN Michel |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-03-14T00:00:00New
2014-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/2/committee |
Old
IMCONew
EMPL |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionNew
Employment and Social Affairs |
committees/2/date |
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00New
2013-03-13T00:00:00 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
S&D |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de182e80fb8127435bdbb50New
4f1adb9bb819f207b30000d3 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA PabloNew
STEINRUCK Jutta |
committees/2/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
committees/4/committee |
Old
TRANNew
IMCO |
committees/4/committee_full |
Old
Transport and TourismNew
Internal Market and Consumer Protection |
committees/4/date |
Old
2013-01-21T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845a0fb8127435bdbd6fNew
4f1ac5f8b819f25efd000011 |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DANTIN MichelNew
ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA Pablo |
committees/4/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/4/shadows |
|
committees/8/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/8/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/8/date |
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00New
2013-01-21T00:00:00 |
committees/8/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
PPE |
committees/8/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188ae0fb8127435bdc39aNew
4f1ac76ab819f25efd000087 |
committees/8/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
STEINRUCK JuttaNew
DANTIN Michel |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-10-14T00:00:00New
2012-11-29T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0698:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE519.457New
COM(2012)0698 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.457New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0698/COM_COM(2012)0698_EN.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/2 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/5/date |
Old
2014-02-25T00:00:00New
2014-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2014-01-14T00:00:00New
2014-02-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.457
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-07-26T00:00:00New
2012-11-29T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0698:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE516.736New
COM(2012)0698 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.736New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0698/COM_COM(2012)0698_EN.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-10-09T00:00:00New
2013-07-26T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/title |
Old
PE519.457New
PE516.736 |
activities/2/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.736
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-01-13T00:00:00New
2014-01-14T00:00:00 |
procedure/subject/13 |
Old
5.05 Sustainable economic growthNew
5.05 Economic growth |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.736
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-07-24T00:00:00New
2013-07-26T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/5 |
|
committees/4/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2013-03-13T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2013-03-13T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/subject/13 |
Old
5.05 Sustainable development and growthNew
5.05 Sustainable economic growth |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|