Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PITTELLA Gianni ( S&D) | GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó ( PPE), TORVALDS Nils ( ALDE), JOLY Eva ( Verts/ALE), EPPINK Derk Jan ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 142-p1
Legal Basis:
RoP 142-p1Events
The European Parliament adopted by 265 votes to 79, with 37 abstentions, a resolution on the European central Bank Annual Report for 2012.
Monetary policy: Parliament welcomed the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to stabilising the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign. However, it was deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in parts of the EU, creating instability for the eurozone as a whole and threatening the popular and political support for the whole European project.
It believed that the positive effects of the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates were limited , and recalled that, in the long term, very low interest rates may cause distortions in the business sector and harm private savings and pension plans.
Parliament considers that the three-year long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) undertaken in March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure. It is deeply concerned about the transfer of risks from struggling banks and governments onto the ECB’s balance sheet as a result of the ECB’s decision to buy ‘unlimited’ amounts of short-term government debt.
The resolution considered that the monetary policy tools that the ECB had used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, had revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market . The ECB should explore further measures.
Pointing out that at present similar SMEs from across the eurozone do not have similar access to loans, Members asked that the ECB take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific programme to help SMEs access credit .
Parliament recalled that the non-standard monetary policy measures of the ECB were intended to be of transitory nature and should, therefore, in no way be regarded by the banking sector as a permanent instrument. It was concerned about the significantly high levels of Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) lines provided by national central banks in the course of 2011.
Parliament encouraged the ECB to (i) send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures; (ii) start phasing out such measures as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished, as soon as the link between the banks and the sovereign can be severed, and as soon as the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify such a decision.
Members recalled that the conduct of monetary policy should be democratic and should result from deliberation between different viewpoints in order that transparency may be strengthened. They recalled, in this respect, the importance of the monetary dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs.
Banking union: Parliament noted that the European banking system was still fragile and needed to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true banking union. It welcomed the progress achieved on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) which should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross-border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States. It also suggested that the ECB should welcome the possibility of involving non-eurozone Member States in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonisation of supervisory practices within the EU.
The resolution drew attention to the need for:
a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision; the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the SSM needs to be balanced by greater accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament; ensuring transparency in the supervision of banks, as provided in the interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB; operational separation of the ECB’s core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy; the establishment of a Single Resolution Mechanism in order to protect taxpayers and prevent further banking crises.
Institutional questions: Members pointed out that the Regulation on the SSM provides for interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on democratic accountability. They urged the ECB to meet the new requirements, in particular in terms of democratic accountability and transparency in its supervisory activities. The ECB was invited to publish
the summary minutes of the Governing Council meetings, including arguments and voting records;
Lastly, concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament’s resolution of 25 October 2012 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, Parliament felt that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it was essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Gianni PITTELLA (S&D, IT) on the European Central Bank Annual report for 2012.
Monetary policy : Members welcomed the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to stabilising the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign. However, they were deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in parts of the EU, creating instability for the eurozone as a whole and threatening the popular and political support for the whole European project.
They believed that the positive effects of the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates were limited , and noted with concern that the banking system’s demand for liquidity from the Eurosystem increased in 2012. The report considered that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, had revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market. The ECB could explore further measures.
Pointing out that at present similar SMEs from across the eurozone do not have similar access to loans, Members asked that the ECB take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific programme to help SMEs access credit. The report also encouraged the ECB to (i) send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures; (ii) start phasing such measures out as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished, as soon as the link between the banks and the sovereign can be severed, and as soon as the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify such a decision.
Members recalled that the conduct of monetary policy should be democratic and should result from deliberation between different viewpoints in order that transparency may be strengthened. They recalled, in this respect, the importance of the monetary dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs.
Banking union: the report noted that the European Banking System was still fragile and needed to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true banking union. Members welcomed the progress achieved on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) which should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross-border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States. They also suggested that the ECB should welcome the possibility of involving non-eurozone Member States in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonisation of supervisory practices within the EU.
The report drew attention to the need for:
· a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision;
· the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the SSM needs to be balanced by greater accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament;
· ensuring transparency in the supervision of banks, as provided in the interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB;
· operational separation of the ECB’s core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy;
· the establishment of a Single Resolution Mechanism in order to protect taxpayers and prevent further banking crises;
In order to reduce risk and strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the development of the ‘too big to fail’ institutions, Members felt that consideration could be given to introducing a full separation between deposit and investment banks.
The report went on to state that the “troika” should be replaced by a system whereby the Commission, accountable to Parliament, was put at the heart of the mechanism with programme countries, the Eurogroup was included in the decision-making process, the ECB provided expertise and the IMF gives advice where appropriate.
With regard to institiutional questions , Members pointed out that the regulation on the SSM provides for interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on democratic accountability. They urged the ECB to meet the new requirements, in particular in terms of democratic accountability and transparency in its supervisory activities .
Lastly, concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament’s resolution of 25 October 2012 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, Members felt that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it was essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0601/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0382/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.605
- Committee draft report: PE513.252
- Committee draft report: PE513.252
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.605
Activities
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Gianni PITTELLA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- László SURJÁN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Burkhard BALZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mario BORGHEZIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana BRZOBOHATÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Leonardo DOMENICI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisa FERREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GOULARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eva JOLY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Peter MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antigoni PAPADOPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio Paolo Francesco SILVESTRIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivo STREJČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Corien WORTMANN-KOOL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0382/2013 - Gianni Pittella - § 48 #
PT | ES | BE | SE | EL | LV | AT | MT | CY | FR | EE | SI | LT | FI | IE | DK | SK | LU | CZ | HU | RO | HR | BG | IT | DE | NL | GB | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
9
|
15
|
17
|
9
|
2
|
5
|
11
|
3
|
1
|
46
|
4
|
1
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
16
|
8
|
28
|
4
|
7
|
29
|
58
|
20
|
33
|
27
|
|
S&D |
82
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
France S&DFor (9) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (14) |
2
|
United Kingdom S&D |
2
|
||||||
Verts/ALE |
35
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (10) |
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (7) |
2
|
4
|
||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
15
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
20
|
1
|
1
|
Austria NI |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands NIAgainst (5) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
EFD |
17
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDFor (5) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
28
|
Czechia ECRAgainst (8) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
50
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (4) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Romania ALDEAgainst (5) |
3
|
3
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (5) |
4
|
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||
PPE |
146
|
2
|
Spain PPEAgainst (5) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Constance LE GRIP,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Jean-Marie CAVADA,
Jean-Paul GAUZÈS,
Jean-Pierre AUDY,
Joseph DAUL,
Marielle BOULLIER GALLO,
Maurice PONGA,
Michèle STRIFFLER,
Philippe BOULLAND,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Sophie AUCONIE,
Tokia SAÏFI,
Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
|
1
|
1
|
Lithuania PPEAgainst (4) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (6) |
11
|
4
|
3
|
Italy PPEFor (1)Against (14)Abstain (1) |
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Axel VOSS,
Bernd POSSELT,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Birgit SCHNIEBER-JASTRAM,
Burkhard BALZ,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Gabriele STAUNER,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Peter JAHR,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Thomas MANN
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (4) |
Poland PPEAgainst (17)
Andrzej GRZYB,
Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Filip KACZMAREK,
Jacek PROTASIEWICZ,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jan KOZŁOWSKI,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Jolanta Emilia HIBNER,
Krzysztof LISEK,
Paweł ZALEWSKI
|
A7-0382/2013 - Gianni Pittella - § 49 #
BE | SE | RO | FR | ES | DK | AT | EE | EL | BG | MT | CY | IE | LT | LU | FI | PT | LV | SI | GB | SK | NL | HU | HR | DE | CZ | IT | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
17
|
9
|
28
|
47
|
14
|
6
|
11
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
8
|
4
|
10
|
9
|
5
|
1
|
32
|
5
|
20
|
8
|
4
|
59
|
15
|
31
|
26
|
|
S&D |
82
|
4
|
3
|
France S&DFor (9) |
5
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom S&DAbstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
Germany S&DFor (14) |
5
|
5
|
2
|
|||||
ALDE |
50
|
4
|
2
|
Romania ALDE |
France ALDEFor (5) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
United Kingdom ALDE |
4
|
Germany ALDE |
3
|
|||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
37
|
3
|
3
|
France Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8) |
||||||||||||||||
NI |
21
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Austria NIFor (3)Against (2) |
3
|
Netherlands NIAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
EFD |
17
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDAgainst (5) |
4
|
||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
15
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
25
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (13) |
1
|
Czechia ECRAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PPE |
145
|
4
|
1
|
11
|
France PPEAgainst (16)Abstain (1) |
Spain PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Lithuania PPEAgainst (4) |
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (4) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Axel VOSS,
Bernd POSSELT,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Birgit SCHNIEBER-JASTRAM,
Burkhard BALZ,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Gabriele STAUNER,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Peter JAHR,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Thomas MANN
|
2
|
Italy PPEFor (1)Against (14)Abstain (1) |
Poland PPEAgainst (17)
Andrzej GRZYB,
Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Filip KACZMAREK,
Jacek PROTASIEWICZ,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jan KOZŁOWSKI,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Jolanta Emilia HIBNER,
Krzysztof LISEK,
Paweł ZALEWSKI
|
A7-0382/2013 - Gianni Pittella - Résolution #
DE | RO | PL | IT | FR | ES | LT | FI | BE | BG | DK | CZ | HU | SK | IE | SE | HR | LU | EE | MT | PT | LV | SI | CY | GB | NL | EL | AT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
55
|
28
|
27
|
31
|
44
|
13
|
8
|
10
|
17
|
6
|
6
|
16
|
7
|
5
|
5
|
9
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
9
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
33
|
19
|
1
|
11
|
|
PPE |
139
|
Germany PPEFor (25)Albert DESS, Axel VOSS, Bernd POSSELT, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Birgit SCHNIEBER-JASTRAM, Burkhard BALZ, Christa KLASS, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Gabriele STAUNER, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Peter MAYER, Herbert REUL, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Joachim ZELLER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Peter JAHR, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Thomas MANN
|
Poland PPEFor (17)Andrzej GRZYB, Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Filip KACZMAREK, Jacek PROTASIEWICZ, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Jan KOZŁOWSKI, Jan OLBRYCHT, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Jolanta Emilia HIBNER, Krzysztof LISEK, Paweł ZALEWSKI
|
Italy PPEFor (14)Abstain (2) |
France PPEFor (17)Alain LAMASSOURE, Arnaud DANJEAN, Constance LE GRIP, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Jean-Marie CAVADA, Jean-Paul GAUZÈS, Jean-Pierre AUDY, Joseph DAUL, Marielle BOULLIER GALLO, Maurice PONGA, Michèle STRIFFLER, Philippe BOULLAND, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Sophie AUCONIE, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Spain PPEFor (4) |
Lithuania PPEFor (4) |
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
|||
S&D |
75
|
Germany S&DFor (12) |
2
|
5
|
France S&DFor (8) |
5
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom S&D |
2
|
||||||||
ALDE |
49
|
Germany ALDE |
Romania ALDE |
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ALDE |
4
|
1
|
|||||||||||
ECR |
28
|
4
|
1
|
Czechia ECR |
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (1) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
EFD |
17
|
4
|
Italy EFDAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
21
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands NIAgainst (5) |
Austria NIAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
15
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
36
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (8) |
France Verts/ALEAgainst (10) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
Amendments | Dossier |
247 |
2013/2076(INI)
2013/07/12
ECON
247 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the consolidated financial statement of the Eurosystem reached EUR 3 trillion at the end of 2012, representing an increase of approximately 12 % over the course of 2012;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Understands the Bank of International Settlements' (BIS) warnings about too long a period of quantitative easing ('whatever it takes'); follows with interest the discussions in most major central banks on the best timetable to wind down their loose monetary policies; notes that amongst others the Federal Reserve Board intends to exit from the present policies as soon as this is possible; understands that the ECB will maintain an accommodative policy stands as long as the banking sector is not fully stabilised, and spill-overs into the public sector remain a threat, a policy which is made possible by the low inflation rates which are expected over the medium term;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers it necessary that the ECB programmes for liquidity provision also properly address inflationary concerns, for example by sterilisation;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Considers, in the light of the recent developments in the US, that economic recovery and higher growth in the economy represent a sound and solid basis for a progressive phase-out of the quantitative easing policy measures;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Recalls that the quantitative easing policy measures of the ECB were intended to be of transitory nature and should hence in no way be regarded by the banking sector as a permanent instrument;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Encourages the ECB to send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures and to start their phasing-out as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished and the link between the banks and the sovereign could be severed and the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify this decision;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas non-marketable assets represented the largest component of assets put forward as collateral to the Eurosystem in the course of 2012, amounting to around 25% of the total; whereas non-marketable securities, together with asset-backed securities, represent more than 40 % of total assets put forward as collateral;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market; c
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have revealed their limits
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market; considers, therefore, that the ECB could investigate the possibilities of implementing
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, have revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market; considers, therefore, that the ECB could investigate the possibilities of implementing new unconventional measures aimed at participating in a large, EU-wide pro-growth programme, including soft loans aimed directly at small and medium-sized enterprises or the use of the Emergency
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the European institutions ought to have acted to restore confidence – not just in the financial markets, but also in the real economy – and to encourage investment in business;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the Annual Report of the Bank for International Settlements and its finding that an accommodative monetary policy has caused reform efforts in the eurozone to slacken and the dependence between banks and sovereigns has increased;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Urges the ECB’s Governing Council to raise its inflation target in order to accommodate wage increases in eurozone economies in surplus and hence enable eurozone aggregate demand to be boosted while reducing country imbalances within the eurozone;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Asks the ECB to publish, in its monthly report, figures for the amount of public debt of each Member State posted as collateral by financial institutions;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Is concerned about the significantly high levels of Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) lines provided by national central banks in the course of 2011 under the authorisation of the ECB and demands further disclosure of, and complementary information on, the precise extent of such lines and the underlying operations and on the conditions attached to them;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Remarks that the ELA should only be used for banks that are still viable; is concerned about the use of ELA in Cyprus and believes that this program should be cautiously applied;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Asks the ECB to lower collateral requirements and the stance on collateral rules for asset-backed securities (ABS), as these are deeply correlated with loans to households and SMEs;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 e (new) 9e. Believes that, on collateral rules, the same standards should apply for sovereign as for regional government bonds in those cases where regions have legislative and tax powers, as both types of bond have relevant influence on the good transmission of the ECB monetary policy;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 f (new) 9f. Acknowledges that, since the monetary transmission mechanism is not functioning properly, the ECB should seek ways to target SMEs more directly; points out that at present similar SMEs from across the Eurozone do not have similar access to loans despite having similar economic prospects and risks; invites the ECB to implement a policy to purchase high quality securitised SME loans directly, particularly from some Member States where the monetary transmission mechanism is broken; stresses that this policy should be limited in amount and time, fully sterilised and directed to avoid risks on the ECB balance sheet;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 g (new) 9g. Believes that the ECB should take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific program to help SMEs to access to credit in the lines of the funding for lending scheme of the Bank of England;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 h (new) 9h. Deems that the TARGET2 settlement system has played a crucial role for safeguarding the integrity of the Eurozone financial system; notes, however, that the significant TARGET2 imbalances reveal the worrying fragmentation of financial markets within the Eurozone, as well as the ongoing capital flight in Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the aggregate turnover for all instruments in the euro money market decreased by 14% in the second quarter of 2012 compared with the second quarter of the previous year;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 i (new) 9i. Underlines that interesting lessons may be drawn for the Eurozone from the study of the functioning of balance of payments systems in other federal monetary unions such as the United States;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it necessary to review the Treaties and the ECB’s statutes in order to establish price stability together with
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Remains worried by the significant levels of non-marketable assets and asset- backed securities put forward as collateral to the eurosystem in the framework of its refinancing operations; asks the ECB to provide information on which central banks have accepted such securities as well as to disclose valuation methods regarding such assets; underlines that such disclosure would be beneficial for the purpose of parliamentary scrutiny of supervisory tasks conferred to the ECB;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas Emergency Liquidity Assistance lines provided by National Central Banks as represented under the item 'other claims on euro area credit institutions denominated in euro' of the Eurosystem consolidated financial statement reached unprecedented levels over 2012 and amounted to EUR 206 billion at the end of 2012;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the ECB to make public the legal decision concerning the OMT programme in order to be able to analyse more deeply its details and implications;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Underlines that ELA lines are reported under the category 'other claims on Euro area credit institutions denominated in Euro' in the Eurosystem consolidated balance sheets without providing further disclosure and more granular information on such lines as well as on the underlying operations and conditions attached to them; asks the ECB to improve the reporting provided on ELAs developments on a country-by- country basis on its website;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Is encouraged by the stabilization of the levels of TARGET II imbalances over the second half of 2012; underlines that the TARGET II settlement system has played a crucial role for safeguarding the integrity of the euro area financial system; remains, nevertheless, concerned by the ongoing fragmentation of financial markets within the Euro area;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 d (new) 10d. Stresses that stable inflation rates, in line with the medium term rate objective defined by the ECB, may be associated with unsustainable debt dynamics, underlying the importance to manage asset bubbles and the growth of credit even when price stability is guaranteed;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 e (new) 10e. Is concerned by the persistent inflation and yield curve differentials within the Euro area; recommends that the ECB follow a proactive macroprudential approach associated with its monetary policy instruments so as to deal with regional asset bubbles and imbalances; asks the ECB to explore whether regional fine-tuning regarding collateral, haircut and reserve requirements may be appropriate for coping with asymmetric shocks, thereby enhancing financial stability within the monetary union while preserving price stability;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 f (new) 10f. Looks forward to the announced ECB assessment of the 'Irish Promissory Notes' deal and its consistency with the Treaty provisions regarding monetary financing;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 g (new) 10g. Asks the ECB to disclose to the European Parliament the secret 'Agreements on Net Financial Assets' between the National central banks and the ECB regarding inter alia the amounts of different classes of assets, including government bonds that an Euro area central bank can hold in its balance sheet;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E c (new) Ec. whereas the ECB's long-term refinancing operations of February 2012 provided EUR 529.5 billion to the Euro area based financial institutions in loans with a maturity of 3 years and an initial 1% interest rate;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Argues that the conduct of monetary policy should
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Argues that
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Argues that the conduct of monetary
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Argues that the conduct of monetary policy should
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the ECB's long-term refinancing operations of December 2011 and February 2012 granted over EUR 1 trillion - EUR 489 billion and EUR 529.5 billion respectively - to European banks in the form of low-interest loans with a term of 3 years and a 1% interest rate;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the ECB to
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the ECB to pay more attention to the contractionary effects on GDP, employment and social welfare created by austerity policies carried out by national governments in the framework of Economic Assistance Programmes involving the ECB; asks the ECB to ensure that its contribution to the assessment by the Troika of progress in implementing the fiscal alignment programmes helps strike an optimum balance between growth, fiscal alignment and reform;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the ECB to
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the ECB to pay more attention to the contractionary effects on GDP, employment and social welfare created by
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the ECB to
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Invites the ECB
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Is concerned about possible side effects of a prolonged extraordinarily accommodative monetary policy, such as aggressive risk taking, the build-up of financial imbalances, distortions in financial market pricing and incentives to delay necessary balance sheet repair and reforms; encourages the ECB to strike the right balance between the risks of exiting its extraordinarily accommodative policy stance prematurely and the risks associated with further delaying the exit;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the European Economic Forecast in Spring 2012 showed low levels of business and consumer sentiment, high unemployment limiting private consumption and declining export growth since 2010, which has led to a levelling off in GDP growth during 2011 and 2012;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Underlines that the ECB
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Underlines that the ECB's independence sh
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Underlines that the ECB's independence should not justify lack of democratic accountability and recalls in this respect the importance of the Monetary Dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Underlines that the ECB’s independence should
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Underlines that the ECB's independence
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Underlines th
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) remain the backbone of the Euro area economy, representing about 98% of all Euro area firms, employing around three quarters of the euro area's employees and generating around 60% of value added;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers that the exchange rate i
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the ECB to p
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the ECB to pay more attention to
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the ECB to pay more attention to the euro exchange rate in order to avoid
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Underlines th
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Underlines the importance of supporting the euro as an international currency
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. whereas the creditworthiness and financial health of SMEs have deteriorated more sharply than those of large firms and the protracted period of weak economic conditions have exacerbated the asymmetric information challenges of SMEs;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Underlines the importance of
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the ECB to study the possibility of using forward guidance as a non-conventional tool to enhance the correct transmission of monetary policy; remarks that forward guidance should be tied to positive changes in the economic growth of the Eurozone or to a increase in inflation in the medium term beyond 2%;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Invites the ECB, in cooperation with the national central banks, to explain its policies in terms of currency swap deals designed to provide support for the bilateral economic and trade exchanges and to help maintain financial stability;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that the European Banking
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that the European Banking System is still fragile and needs to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true single banking
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the progress achieved on the negotiations on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) regulation conferring on the ECB the power of supervision over eurozone credit institutions;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the progress achieved on the negotiations on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) regulation conferring on the ECB the power of supervision over eurozone credit institutions; believes the setting-up of the SSM will contribute to severing the link between banks and sovereigns and
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the progress achieved
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the progress achieved on the negotiations on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) regulation conferring on the ECB the power of supervision over eurozone credit institutions; believes the setting-up of the SSM will contribute to severing the link between banks and sovereigns and will help develop a common European approach to crisis management; regrets that the SSM was not chosen for the supervision of the European Investment Bank (EIB);
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Welcomes the fact that the ECB President has repeatedly emphasised that the SSM should be complemented by a single resolution mechanism (SRM); also welcomes the call by the ECB and the Commission to include in such a framework a common resolution fund for institutions under a future single resolution authority as an integral part of the SRM;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 – having regard to
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F d (new) Fd. whereas according to the information provided by the Survey on Access to Finance of Enterprises (SAFE) SMEs' profits, liquidity, buffers and own capital have developed less favourably than those of large firms during the crisis;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Considers that the establishment of the SSM should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross- border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Invites the SSM to operate in a manner fully consistent with the principles underpinning the single market in financial services and in full adherence to the single rulebook for financial services;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Considers that the ECB should welcome the possibility to involve non- Euro area Member states in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonization of supervisory practices within the EU;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the importance of a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision and in order to avoid a doubling of requirements for institutions; underlines that the principle of proportionality and the diversity in national banking sectors have to be taken into account;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the importance of a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision, while guaranteeing full separation between monetary policy and supervision;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes that the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism needs to be balanced by greater democratic accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament; insists that the highest standards regarding accountability of supervisors in National Parliaments should be applied in the case of the SSM accountability to the European Parliament;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers that transparency in the field of banking supervision is res
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers that reasoned transparency in the field of banking supervision is essential and that the ECB should take all possible measures to improve its transparency such as, inter alia, by publishing the publication of the minutes of the Supervisory Board on its website, while complying with confidentiality requirements as defined in Union law;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers that transparency in the field of banking supervision is essential and that the ECB should take all possible measures to improve its transparency such as, inter alia, the publication of the minutes (including a full account of the policy discussion) of the Supervisory Board;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 282 TFEU states that the primary objective of the ECB is to maintain price
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers that transparency in the field of banking supervision is essential and that the ECB should take all possible measures to improve its transparency
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Looks forward to the adoption of an interinstitutional arrangement with the ECB formalizing EP scrutiny of the ECB Supervisory Board; is of the opinion that such arrangement should include scrutiny powers on ELAs, LTRO and other monetary tools presenting a potential of conflict of interest between the ECB's role in determining the solvency of an institution and its obligation to lend only to solvent institutions; stresses the need to set up an appropriate mechanism for identifying and resolving potential conflicts of interest between monetary policy and supervisory powers;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Points out that the concept of 'insolvency' underpinning the provision of central bank liquidity to institutions in the Euro area lacks a sufficient level of clarity as the concept refers both to a situation arising in a bank after a judicial determination of insolvency or alternatively as the situation where competent supervisory authorities determine that an institution does not comply with minimum requirements defined in the CRD/CRR framework; underlines that such a lack of clarity needs to be addressed so as to guarantee legal certainty and foster financial stability;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that the allocation of supervisory tasks to the ECB poses new challenges in terms of conflict of interest, and that the current ECB internal rules are not
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Recalls that it is of paramount importance that the ECB ensure operational separation of the core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy; underlines the crucial need for the agreement negotiated between the ECB and the European Parliament regarding practical measures to ensure democratic accountability;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution System within which national resolution authorities should have at their disposal a minimum set of common resolution tools and powers in order to protect depositors and prevent further banking crises;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution System in order to protect depositors
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution System for credit institutions and other financial establishments in order to protect depositors and prevent further banking crises; proposes that a European Resolution System should also be envisaged for insurance undertakings;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution System in
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 282 TFEU states that the primary objective of the ECB is to maintain price stability and that the ECB should support general economic policies of the Union without prejudice to price stability; whereas the E
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers it urgent to approve the establishment of a European Resolution System and Authority in order to protect depositors and prevent further banking crises;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that, in order to strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the development of
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that in order to strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the development of the
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that in order to strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the development of the ‘too big to fail’ syndrome,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 282 TFEU states that the primary objective of the ECB is to maintain price stability and that
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that further regulatory action has to be taken in order to strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Believes that the "troika" should be replaced by a system where the Commission, accountable to the European Parliament, is put at the heart of the mechanism with Program Countries, while the Eurogroup is included in the decision-making process, the ECB provides expertise and the IMF would give advice where appropriate;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Points out that the draft regulation on the Single Supervisory Mechanism provides for interinstitutional arrangements to be concluded between the European Parliament and the ECB on
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the ECB to subject every aspect of its activity to critical self- assessment, including the impact of the adjustment programmes that it has helped to shape and the ex post adequacy of the macroeconomic assumptions and scenarios underlying those programmes;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the ECB to publish the summary minutes of the Governing Council meetings, including arguments and voting records;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Is deeply concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament's resolution of 25 October 2012
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Is deeply concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament's resolution of 25 October 20123 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, and notes that due consideration should be given to both the expertise and the gender balance of members in the appointment of ECB top management;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the Bank for International Settlements has noted in its Annual Report that, as a result of the low interest rate policy in the eurozone, reform efforts in the Member States have considerably slackened;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Recalls that, according to Article 10.4 of the Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the proceedings of the meetings of the Governing Council shall be confidential but it may decide to make the outcome of its deliberations public; believes that, unless the Governing Council has taken such a decision, all its members are bound by confidentiality and loyalty;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Asks the ECB to provide a detailed reaction to the annual European Parliament's report on the ECB in its subsequent annual reports;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Takes the view that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it is essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved in order to better represent European citizens;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Deeply disapproves of the fact the Member States ignored the negative vote in the European Parliament, both in the ECON Committee and in the plenary, because of the lack of gender balance perspective during the appointment of Yves Mersch;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new) 27c. Urges the Member States to incorporate a gender-balance perspective with possibility for positive action on the basis of a balanced gender representation in regard to the appointment of members to the Executive Board; whenever a vacancy arises on the Executive Board, Euro Member States should be encouraged to nominate two candidates, one male and one female, for the vacant position;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 d (new) 27d. Believes that the principles of gender balance in appointment to leading positions should also apply to the Steering Committee and Advisory Committee of the ESRB as well as the Boards of Supervisors of the ESAs;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 e (new) 27e. Believes that Member States should also be encouraged to appoint women as governors of the National Central Banks (NCBs) in order to achieve a better gender balance on the Governing Council and the General Council of the ECB as well as on the General Board of the ESRB;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas Article 123 TFEU and Article 21 of Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank prohibit the monetary financing of governments;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas a low-inflation environment is the best contribution monetary policy can make to creating favourable conditions for economic growth, job creation, social cohesion and financial stability;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the recommendations concerning transparency of voting and the publication of summary minutes put forward in previous Parliament resolutions on the ECB annual reports have not yet been taken into account;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas a low-inflation environment is the best contribution monetary policy can make to creating favourable conditions for economic growth, job creation, social cohesion and financial stability;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas actions of national macro- prudential authorities should take account of the responsibility of the European Systemic Risk Board for macro-prudential oversight of financial system within the EU;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the 83rd Annual Report 2012/2013 of the Bank for International Settlements,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas maintaining a flow of credit to SMEs is particularly important as they employ 72 % of the eurozone's labour force and have significantly higher gross job creation (and destruction) rates than large enterprises;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G c (new) Gc. whereas the recommendations put forward in previous European Parliament resolutions on the ECB annual reports concerning transparency of voting and publication of summary minutes have not yet been taken into account;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G c (new) Gc. whereas the deposit facility held EUR 315.754 million on 28 September 2012;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G d (new) Gd. whereas credit in the Eurozone is falling by 2% annually and in some countries as Spain the annual fall is at 8% only in 2012;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G e (new) Ge. whereas SMEs have to pay much higher borrowing costs depending on the country of the Eurozone in which they are situated, creating distortions in the single market;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G f (new) Gf. whereas the borrowing costs of SMEs are no longer related to their balance sheet and viability but to their origin inside the Eurozone;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G g (new) Gg. Believes that the credit crunch that is currently affecting SMEs in some parts of the Eurozone is one of the fundamental problems delaying the economic recovery;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Welcomes the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to the stabilisation of the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in Europe
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is deeply concerned at the fact that
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the 83rd Annual Report of the Bank of International Settlements published on 23 June 2013,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is deeply concerned
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is deeply concerned about the
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in Europe, creating overwhelming discontent among European citizens and uncertainty regarding investors, therefore jeopardising the whole European project;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is deeply concerned at the fact that persistently
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the readiness of the ECB to do whatever it takes to save the Euro; underlines and welcomes the fact that the ECB Governing Council considers that its mandate allows it to fight excessive borrowing costs for Euro area Member States;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes that the recourse to the main refinancing operations, the medium and long-term refinancing operations with full allotment at fixed rates, the recourse to the marginal lending facility, the ELAs and the deposit facility remained all at significantly high levels throughout 2012 signalling a severe impairment of the monetary transmission mechanism and the Eurozone interbank lending market, albeit a significant improvement in the situation signalled by the stabilization of spreads and TARGET II imbalances was observed over the second half of the year;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates in the context of very low inflation expectations
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, according to the Commission services' spring 2013 forecast, GDP in the eurozone fell by 0.6 % in 2012
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that, in addressing the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs on 8 July 2013, the ECB President announced that key ECB interest rates were expected to remain at current or lower levels for an extended period based on limited medium-term inflation estimates and the need to underpin the real economy;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that the overall price stability objective in the Euro area is not undermined by non conventional policies implemented by the ECB given that an expansion of reserves in excess of compulsory requirement does not give banks more resources to expand lending nor represent idle resources but merely changes the composition of liquid assets of the banking system;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the banking system's demand for liquidity from the Eurosystem increased in 2012, thus strengthening the dependence of the banking system on the Eurosystem's intervention, and warns of the risks of such dependence;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this is
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure; notes that, despite the liquidity injected into the banking system by the LTRO, the credit available to the real economy is still below pre-crisis levels;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure; notes that, despite the liquidity injected into the banking system by the LTRO, the credit available to the real economy is still below pre-crisis levels;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure; notes that, despite the liquidity injected into the banking system by the LTRO, the credit available to the real economy is still below pre-crisis levels;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure; notes that, despite the liquidity injected into the banking system by the LTRO, the credit available to the real economy is still below pre-crisis levels;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, according to the same forecast, unemployment in the eurozone rose from 10.2 % at the end of 2011 to 11.4 % at the end of 2012, with major differences being observed between eurozone countries where the unemployment figures vary between 4.3% and 25%, the percentages being even higher in respect of youth unemployment;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure; notes that, despite the liquidity injected into the banking system by the LTRO, the credit available to the real economy is still below pre-crisis levels; suggests that it would be appropriate for the ECB to reduce its deposit facility rate to
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the three-year LTRO settled on March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure; notes that, despite the liquidity injected into the banking system by the LTRO, the credit available to the real economy is still below pre-crisis levels;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Is deeply concerned about the transfer of risks from struggling banks and governments onto the ECB's balance sheet as a result of the ECB's decision to buy 'unlimited' amounts of short-term government debt; stresses that the LTROs do not provide a fundamental solution to the crisis;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Remarks that the LTROs were used by the banks to buy sovereign debt and refinance their bonds but credit to SMEs has not grown as a result of it;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Regrets that two enterprises from the automotive sector used the LTRO to finance themselves though their banking branch; asks the ECB not to permit this situation in the future;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the availability of the ECB to provide further support to the financial and banking system must be properly subject to conditionality, in particular the commitment by institutions benefiting from such support to increase levels of credit to the real economy, to small and medium-sized enterprises and to households, without which such efforts would prove to be ineffective;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, according to the same forecast, unemployment in the eurozone rose from 10.2 % at the end of 2011 to 11.4 % at the end of 2012 and youth unemployment increased significantly over the same period;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the availability of the ECB to provide further support to the financial and banking system must be properly subject to strong conditionality, in particular the
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls its position on the CRD IV negotiation process to impose additional conditions to institutions having benefited from ECB liquidity support; underlines that such conditionality should be directly linked to the economic benefits provided to banks by means of the non- conventional monetary policy measures, among which the three and one years maturity funding (LTRO), the decrease in the levels of compulsory reserves, the full allotment at fixed rates for its refinancing operations and the enlargement of the spectrum of eligible collateral;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the ECB bond-buying programmes violate at least the intent, if not the letter, of Article 123 TFEU; urges the ECB to refrain from assuming a political role and monetary financing government deficits;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that a national central bank's functions must be performed in a matter that is fully compatible with the functional, institutional and financial independence to safeguard the proper performance of its tasks under the Treaty and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the ECB;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that the transmission of monetary policy is not effective throughout the Eurozone since interest rates in countries facing economic difficulties are disproportionately high; underlines that higher interest rates in these countries are not only hampering the financing of the economy and its recovery but they also distort competition in the Internal Market; calls, therefore, on the ECB to introduce as soon as possible new instruments to address the ineffective transmission of monetary policy;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that insufficient growth in the European business sector is not mainly due to the insufficient availability of credit offered by the banking sector;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that the use of Emergency Liquidity Assistance facility should not in cases of resolution result to an excessive burden for sovereigns or banks inheriting assets of a resolved bank; invites the ECB, also in its capacity as a member of the troikas where applicable, to support favourable terms of repayment of ELA in all such cases;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Is concerned about the fact that credit tightening appears to be very severe for the SMEs, because they are perceived by banks to have a higher probability of default than larger firms and also because SMEs are often unable to switch from bank credit to other sources of external finance;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Stresses its concern regarding the considerable fragmentation of lending conditions for SMEs across Euro area countries;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, according to the same forecast, unemployment in the eurozone rose from 10.2 % at the end of 2011 to 11.4 % at the end of 2012 and risks further increasing to 12.2 % in 2013 before slightly decreasing again in 2014;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the important role played by the SMP until September 2012 in addressing the malfunctioning of certain eurozone sovereign debt securities market segments;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the important, albeit, limited role played by the SMP in addressing the malfunctioning of certain eurozone sovereign debt securities market segments;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting-up of the OMTs
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting-up of the OMTs, with no ex ante quantitative limits, in order to safeguard monetary policy transmission
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting-up of the OMTs, with no ex ante quantitative limits, in order to safeguard monetary policy transmission,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas in 2012 the ECB reduced interest rates once, in July (25 basis point), reducing them further to a historic low of 0.50% in May 2013;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting-up of the OMTs, with no ex ante quantitative limits, in order to safeguard monetary policy transmission,
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting-up of the OMTs, with no ex ante quantitative limits, in order to safeguard monetary policy transmission, but deplores the decision to link the activation of the OMT to strict
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting-up of the OMTs, with no ex ante quantitative limits, in order to safeguard monetary policy transmission,
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that the punitive financing conditions enforced by the ECB under the adjustment programmes being applied to several Member States are adding to the difficulties that those countries are facing as regards their government accounts, thus exacerbating the snowball effect from which they were already suffering;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Considers that the role which the ECB has assumed in relation to Member States, in recommending – not to say imposing – fiscal and tax policies, changes to the labour market, the privatisation of public services, and other measures, clearly goes beyond even a sweeping interpretation of its task, which is to conduct monetary policy in the eurozone;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 source: PE-516.605
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.252New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-513252_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.605New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-516605_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131212&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-12-12-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 142-p1
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0382&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0382_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0601New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0601_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/12316New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|