BETA


2013/2076(INI) European Central Bank. Annual report for 2012

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON PITTELLA Gianni (icon: S&D S&D) GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó (icon: PPE PPE), TORVALDS Nils (icon: ALDE ALDE), JOLY Eva (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), EPPINK Derk Jan (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 142-p1

Events

2013/12/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/12/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/12/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 265 votes to 79, with 37 abstentions, a resolution on the European central Bank Annual Report for 2012.

Monetary policy: Parliament welcomed the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to stabilising the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign. However, it was deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in parts of the EU, creating instability for the eurozone as a whole and threatening the popular and political support for the whole European project.

It believed that the positive effects of the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates were limited , and recalled that, in the long term, very low interest rates may cause distortions in the business sector and harm private savings and pension plans.

Parliament considers that the three-year long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) undertaken in March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure. It is deeply concerned about the transfer of risks from struggling banks and governments onto the ECB’s balance sheet as a result of the ECB’s decision to buy ‘unlimited’ amounts of short-term government debt.

The resolution considered that the monetary policy tools that the ECB had used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, had revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market . The ECB should explore further measures.

Pointing out that at present similar SMEs from across the eurozone do not have similar access to loans, Members asked that the ECB take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific programme to help SMEs access credit .

Parliament recalled that the non-standard monetary policy measures of the ECB were intended to be of transitory nature and should, therefore, in no way be regarded by the banking sector as a permanent instrument. It was concerned about the significantly high levels of Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) lines provided by national central banks in the course of 2011.

Parliament encouraged the ECB to (i) send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures; (ii) start phasing out such measures as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished, as soon as the link between the banks and the sovereign can be severed, and as soon as the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify such a decision.

Members recalled that the conduct of monetary policy should be democratic and should result from deliberation between different viewpoints in order that transparency may be strengthened. They recalled, in this respect, the importance of the monetary dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs.

Banking union: Parliament noted that the European banking system was still fragile and needed to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true banking union. It welcomed the progress achieved on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) which should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross-border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States. It also suggested that the ECB should welcome the possibility of involving non-eurozone Member States in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonisation of supervisory practices within the EU.

The resolution drew attention to the need for:

a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision; the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the SSM needs to be balanced by greater accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament; ensuring transparency in the supervision of banks, as provided in the interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB; operational separation of the ECB’s core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy; the establishment of a Single Resolution Mechanism in order to protect taxpayers and prevent further banking crises.

Institutional questions: Members pointed out that the Regulation on the SSM provides for interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on democratic accountability. They urged the ECB to meet the new requirements, in particular in terms of democratic accountability and transparency in its supervisory activities. The ECB was invited to publish

the summary minutes of the Governing Council meetings, including arguments and voting records;

Lastly, concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament’s resolution of 25 October 2012 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, Parliament felt that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it was essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved.

Documents
2013/12/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/11/13
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Gianni PITTELLA (S&D, IT) on the European Central Bank Annual report for 2012.

Monetary policy : Members welcomed the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to stabilising the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign. However, they were deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in parts of the EU, creating instability for the eurozone as a whole and threatening the popular and political support for the whole European project.

They believed that the positive effects of the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates were limited , and noted with concern that the banking system’s demand for liquidity from the Eurosystem increased in 2012. The report considered that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, had revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market. The ECB could explore further measures.

Pointing out that at present similar SMEs from across the eurozone do not have similar access to loans, Members asked that the ECB take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific programme to help SMEs access credit. The report also encouraged the ECB to (i) send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures; (ii) start phasing such measures out as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished, as soon as the link between the banks and the sovereign can be severed, and as soon as the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify such a decision.

Members recalled that the conduct of monetary policy should be democratic and should result from deliberation between different viewpoints in order that transparency may be strengthened. They recalled, in this respect, the importance of the monetary dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs.

Banking union: the report noted that the European Banking System was still fragile and needed to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true banking union. Members welcomed the progress achieved on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) which should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross-border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States. They also suggested that the ECB should welcome the possibility of involving non-eurozone Member States in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonisation of supervisory practices within the EU.

The report drew attention to the need for:

· a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision;

· the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the SSM needs to be balanced by greater accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament;

· ensuring transparency in the supervision of banks, as provided in the interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB;

· operational separation of the ECB’s core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy;

· the establishment of a Single Resolution Mechanism in order to protect taxpayers and prevent further banking crises;

In order to reduce risk and strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the development of the ‘too big to fail’ institutions, Members felt that consideration could be given to introducing a full separation between deposit and investment banks.

The report went on to state that the “troika” should be replaced by a system whereby the Commission, accountable to Parliament, was put at the heart of the mechanism with programme countries, the Eurogroup was included in the decision-making process, the ECB provided expertise and the IMF gives advice where appropriate.

With regard to institiutional questions , Members pointed out that the regulation on the SSM provides for interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on democratic accountability. They urged the ECB to meet the new requirements, in particular in terms of democratic accountability and transparency in its supervisory activities .

Lastly, concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament’s resolution of 25 October 2012 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, Members felt that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it was essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved.

Documents
2013/11/05
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/07/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/06/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/06/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/01/14
   EP - PITTELLA Gianni (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ECON

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0382/2013 - Gianni Pittella - § 48 #

2013/12/12 Outcome: -: 230, +: 159, 0: 5
PT ES BE SE EL LV AT MT CY FR EE SI LT FI IE DK SK LU CZ HU RO HR BG IT DE NL GB PL
Total
9
15
17
9
2
5
11
3
1
46
4
1
8
10
6
6
6
4
16
8
28
4
7
29
58
20
33
27
icon: S&D S&D
82

Portugal S&D

3

Greece S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3
3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
15

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
20

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Romania NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
17

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

2
icon: ECR ECR
28

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
50

Spain ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1
3

Ireland ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
3

Italy ALDE

3
icon: PPE PPE
146

Portugal PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Latvia PPE

2

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Czechia PPE

2

A7-0382/2013 - Gianni Pittella - § 49 #

2013/12/12 Outcome: -: 205, +: 180, 0: 8
BE SE RO FR ES DK AT EE EL BG MT CY IE LT LU FI PT LV SI GB SK NL HU HR DE CZ IT PL
Total
17
9
28
47
14
6
11
4
2
7
3
1
6
8
4
10
9
5
1
32
5
20
8
4
59
15
31
26
icon: S&D S&D
82

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Portugal S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

United Kingdom S&D

Abstain (1)

5

Slovakia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Hungary S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
50

Sweden ALDE

2
3

Austria ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Belgium Verts/ALE

3
3

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
21

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

2

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
17

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
15

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
25

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
145

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Portugal PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

3

Czechia PPE

2

A7-0382/2013 - Gianni Pittella - Résolution #

2013/12/12 Outcome: +: 265, -: 79, 0: 37
DE RO PL IT FR ES LT FI BE BG DK CZ HU SK IE SE HR LU EE MT PT LV SI CY GB NL EL AT
Total
55
28
27
31
44
13
8
10
17
6
6
16
7
5
5
9
3
4
4
2
9
5
1
1
33
19
1
11
icon: PPE PPE
139

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2

Ireland PPE

2

Sweden PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Portugal PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

1

Greece PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
75

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Hungary S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

1

Portugal S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
49

Lithuania ALDE

1
3

Ireland ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
28

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
17

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Romania NI

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
15

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
247 2013/2076(INI)
2013/07/12 ECON 247 amendments...
source: PE-516.605

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/4
name
MATIAS Marisa
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.252
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-513252_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.605
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-516605_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2013-11-13T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0382_EN.html title: A7-0382/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-11-13T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0382_EN.html title: A7-0382/2013
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131212&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-12-12-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2013-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0601_EN.html title: T7-0601/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0601_EN.html title: T7-0601/2013
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 142-p1
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: PITTELLA Gianni date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2013-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PITTELLA Gianni group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0382&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0382_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0601
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0601_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: ECR name: EPPINK Derk Jan group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PITTELLA Gianni
  • date: 2013-11-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: ECR name: EPPINK Derk Jan group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PITTELLA Gianni
  • date: 2013-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0382&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0382/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-12-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23672&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131212&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0601 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0601/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: REHN Olli
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2013-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PITTELLA Gianni group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2013-01-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: PITTELLA Gianni
docs
  • date: 2013-06-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.252 title: PE513.252 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-07-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.605 title: PE516.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-05T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-13T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0382&language=EN title: A7-0382/2013 summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Gianni PITTELLA (S&D, IT) on the European Central Bank Annual report for 2012. Monetary policy : Members welcomed the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to stabilising the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign. However, they were deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in parts of the EU, creating instability for the eurozone as a whole and threatening the popular and political support for the whole European project. They believed that the positive effects of the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates were limited , and noted with concern that the banking system’s demand for liquidity from the Eurosystem increased in 2012. The report considered that the monetary policy tools that the ECB has used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, had revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market. The ECB could explore further measures. Pointing out that at present similar SMEs from across the eurozone do not have similar access to loans, Members asked that the ECB take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific programme to help SMEs access credit. The report also encouraged the ECB to (i) send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures; (ii) start phasing such measures out as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished, as soon as the link between the banks and the sovereign can be severed, and as soon as the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify such a decision. Members recalled that the conduct of monetary policy should be democratic and should result from deliberation between different viewpoints in order that transparency may be strengthened. They recalled, in this respect, the importance of the monetary dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs. Banking union: the report noted that the European Banking System was still fragile and needed to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true banking union. Members welcomed the progress achieved on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) which should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross-border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States. They also suggested that the ECB should welcome the possibility of involving non-eurozone Member States in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonisation of supervisory practices within the EU. The report drew attention to the need for: · a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision; · the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the SSM needs to be balanced by greater accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament; · ensuring transparency in the supervision of banks, as provided in the interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB; · operational separation of the ECB’s core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy; · the establishment of a Single Resolution Mechanism in order to protect taxpayers and prevent further banking crises; In order to reduce risk and strengthen the stability of the banking system and avoid the development of the ‘too big to fail’ institutions, Members felt that consideration could be given to introducing a full separation between deposit and investment banks. The report went on to state that the “troika” should be replaced by a system whereby the Commission, accountable to Parliament, was put at the heart of the mechanism with programme countries, the Eurogroup was included in the decision-making process, the ECB provided expertise and the IMF gives advice where appropriate. With regard to institiutional questions , Members pointed out that the regulation on the SSM provides for interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on democratic accountability. They urged the ECB to meet the new requirements, in particular in terms of democratic accountability and transparency in its supervisory activities . Lastly, concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament’s resolution of 25 October 2012 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, Members felt that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it was essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved.
  • date: 2013-12-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23672&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-12-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131212&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-12-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0601 title: T7-0601/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 265 votes to 79, with 37 abstentions, a resolution on the European central Bank Annual Report for 2012. Monetary policy: Parliament welcomed the bold measures taken by the ECB in 2012, which have contributed in a decisive manner to stabilising the banking sector and helping to sever the link between the banks and the sovereign. However, it was deeply concerned at the fact that persistently weak economic conditions are becoming the norm in parts of the EU, creating instability for the eurozone as a whole and threatening the popular and political support for the whole European project. It believed that the positive effects of the decisions of July 2012 to reduce the key ECB interest rates were limited , and recalled that, in the long term, very low interest rates may cause distortions in the business sector and harm private savings and pension plans. Parliament considers that the three-year long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) undertaken in March 2012 contributed to stabilising the banking system, but that this should be a temporary measure. It is deeply concerned about the transfer of risks from struggling banks and governments onto the ECB’s balance sheet as a result of the ECB’s decision to buy ‘unlimited’ amounts of short-term government debt. The resolution considered that the monetary policy tools that the ECB had used since the beginning of the crisis, while providing a welcome relief in distressed financial markets, had revealed their limits as regards stimulating growth and improving the situation on the labour market . The ECB should explore further measures. Pointing out that at present similar SMEs from across the eurozone do not have similar access to loans, Members asked that the ECB take very seriously into account the possibility of launching a specific programme to help SMEs access credit . Parliament recalled that the non-standard monetary policy measures of the ECB were intended to be of transitory nature and should, therefore, in no way be regarded by the banking sector as a permanent instrument. It was concerned about the significantly high levels of Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) lines provided by national central banks in the course of 2011. Parliament encouraged the ECB to (i) send clear signals to the market with regard to the estimated period of activation of its quantitative easing policy measures; (ii) start phasing out such measures as soon as the tension in the banking sector is diminished, as soon as the link between the banks and the sovereign can be severed, and as soon as the economic indicators related to growth and inflation justify such a decision. Members recalled that the conduct of monetary policy should be democratic and should result from deliberation between different viewpoints in order that transparency may be strengthened. They recalled, in this respect, the importance of the monetary dialogue and of the written questions submitted by MEPs. Banking union: Parliament noted that the European banking system was still fragile and needed to be reformed in structural terms and consolidated through the development of a true banking union. It welcomed the progress achieved on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) which should contribute to restoring confidence in the banking sector and to reviving interbank lending and cross-border credit flows through independent integrated supervision for all participating Member States. It also suggested that the ECB should welcome the possibility of involving non-eurozone Member States in the SSM to ensure a greater harmonisation of supervisory practices within the EU. The resolution drew attention to the need for: a fruitful cooperation between the ECB and the competent national authorities within the framework of the SSM, in order to ensure an effective and smooth supervision; the strengthening of the ECB resulting from the establishment of the SSM needs to be balanced by greater accountability vis-à-vis national parliaments and the European Parliament; ensuring transparency in the supervision of banks, as provided in the interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB; operational separation of the ECB’s core units preparing the draft decisions in the field of monetary policy and supervisory policy; the establishment of a Single Resolution Mechanism in order to protect taxpayers and prevent further banking crises. Institutional questions: Members pointed out that the Regulation on the SSM provides for interinstitutional arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on democratic accountability. They urged the ECB to meet the new requirements, in particular in terms of democratic accountability and transparency in its supervisory activities. The ECB was invited to publish the summary minutes of the Governing Council meetings, including arguments and voting records; Lastly, concerned at the contempt shown by the Council towards Parliament’s resolution of 25 October 2012 on the appointment of a new Member of the executive board of the ECB, Parliament felt that the EU institutions, including the ECB, should lead by example in the field of gender balance and that it was essential that the gender representation among leading positions within the ECB be improved.
  • date: 2013-12-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/7/12316
New
  • ECON/7/12316
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
procedure/subject
Old
  • 5.20.03 European Central Bank (ECB), ESCB
New
5.20.03
European Central Bank (ECB), ESCB
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: ECR name: EPPINK Derk Jan group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PITTELLA Gianni
  • date: 2013-11-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: ECR name: EPPINK Derk Jan group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PITTELLA Gianni
  • date: 2013-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0382&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0382/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-12-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23672&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131212&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0601 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0601/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: ECR name: EPPINK Derk Jan group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PITTELLA Gianni
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/7/12316
reference
2013/2076(INI)
title
European Central Bank. Annual report for 2012
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
5.20.03 European Central Bank (ECB), ESCB