BETA


2013/2081(INI) Common foreign and security policy in 2012. Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET BROK Elmar (icon: PPE PPE) PAŞCU Ioan Mircea (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion BUDG NEYNSKY Nadezhda (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 142-p1, Treaty on European Union TEU 36

Events

2013/10/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/10/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 389 votes to 114 with 58 abstentions, a resolution on t he Annual Report from the Council to the European Parliament on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

Parliament highlighted the fact that the first quarter of the twenty-first century was characterised by a period of prolonged structural change that was transforming the global order which demanded a fresh approach to shaping a new multi-polar world order that was inclusive and underpinned by the rule of law and a pluralist democratic model as well as universal values, including human rights. It noted that many obstacles lie ahead, not least in engaging with emerging powers in reforming the multilateral system. The world financial crisis and the growing assertiveness of new emerging economies posed major political, economic, social, cultural and environmental challenges, which required collective and united EU action .

Defend the interests of the EU : Parliament considered that the EU must defend its citizens' interests in the world in a determined, unified manner, while always basing its policies on the promotion of the fundamental values on which the Union is founded. In this respect, EU foreign policy must be flexible in responding to emerging threats and challenges in many areas. The EU needed not only to be coherent and consistent in its external action, but, also develop a common vision. For this reason, Parliament demanded that the instrument of enhanced cooperation be used to secure greater capacity to act, and to overcome the inappropriate use of the veto within the Council. A joint or unified approach should give the EU the strength to pursue its interests and defend its values in the world.

Parliament stressed that the effectiveness of the EU's external action also depends on the full support of its citizens and on the legitimacy it acquires by being anchored in the EU's fundamental values of democracy. It called for Parliament to be regularly informed of foreign policy priorities of the Union.

Building a new, comprehensive approach to the EU’s foreign policy : Parliament urged Member States to play a constructive role in the Union's foreign and security policy and to improve the Union's effectiveness as a cohesive global actor. The need to develop closer cooperation in order to guarantee military security is stressed.

Overall, Members regretted the fact that the EU had not yet developed a clear strategy for it relations with the rest of the world and that its activities were defined more by reaction than by action. It demanded, therefore, a fundamental strategic debate, which should include the Council, the Commission and Parliament and called, as a contribution to this debate, for the European Council in December to further elaborate on the European Global Strategy initiative.

Parliament also stressed that a comprehensive understanding of the CFSP covered all areas of foreign policy, including the progressive framing of the CSDP, which could lead to a common defence.

It called on the Council and the VP/HR to respond to Parliament's recommendation on the 2013 review of the organisation and the functioning of the EEAS in order to ensure the further development of an appropriate and gender-balanced structure within the EEAS (with the participation of the relevant Commission services), in which geographic and thematic expertise are integrated and drive a comprehensive approach to policy planning, formulation and implementation.

Providing leadership and coherence in EU foreign policy : stressing the political leadership role that the VP/HR is expected to play in ensuring the unity, consistency and effectiveness of Union action, Parliament congratulated Lady Ashton on her success in bringing the parties together in the EU-facilitated dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. It considered that these examples of leadership should be applied to Central Asia to the Middle East and from the Horn of Africa across the Sahel. It called for a review of the infrastructure distribution and staffing of EU delegations in order to ensure that the Union’s efficiency, visibility and representation in third countries reflected the EU’s political ambitions and expected priorities. Parliament regretted the Council’s rationale for cutting the multiannual financial framework , which would reduce the Union's capacity to promote peace, security and sustainable economic development and its credibility in respect of such efforts. It stressed the importance of ensuring that the new external relations financial instruments under consideration by Parliament and the Council were fully funded, tailored to furthering the Union’s strategic interests.

Assessing the achievements of the VP/HR and of the Council in 2011 : Parliament welcomed the steps taken by the Council, with the VP/HR’s support, in the 2011 Annual Report towards mapping out the Union’s foreign policy in a forward-looking and strategic policy document. It considered, however, the Council’s Annual Report still falls short of the ambitions of the Lisbon Treaty in important ways, and therefore called for the following in future:

establish clear priorities and strategic guidelines for the CFSP; setting out a framework for assessing existing strategic partners and developing new partnerships, including with international and regional organisations; setting out a roadmap for making progress on important innovations of the Lisbon Treaty, in particular (1) by making operational the assignment of special tasks and missions to a core group of Member States , (2) through the establishment by capable and willing Member States of permanent structured cooperation in defence , and (3) by enhancing the role of, and providing more resources for, the European Defence Agency ; addressing acute problems in CSDP decision-making, inter alia in relation to funding procedures and the financing of operations, that result in incomprehensible delays between the taking of political decisions to launch a mission and the actual deployment of that mission on the ground (Libya and Mali being the most recent in a long line of examples).

In this respect, Parliament called on the Council to request that the VP/HR set out in the next Annual Report her foreign policy objectives for the years 2014 and 2015, along with the timeframe and necessary resources for their implementation. These priorities should focus on the EU’s strategic aims, starting with the transatlantic partnership, the economic and political development of its Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods, and the Middle East Peace Process.

It called on the Council and the VP/HR, when drawing up future Annual Reports on the CFSP, to engage with the Committee on Foreign Affairs at an early stage in order to discuss foreign policy objectives for the coming years. Members also welcomed the initiative of holding a European Council Summit in December 2013. Parliament called for this meeting to deliver a clear roadmap with timelines for achieving key objectives, including, in the first instance, the timely review of the European Security Strategy and the use of a White Book serving as a common template for concurrent national security and defence reviews. It stressed the need to develop closer cooperation in order to guarantee military security and achieve savings.

Strategic priorities : Parliament welcomed the development of ‘strategic partnerships’ as a format for the EU's engagement with both established and emerging powers. These partnerships should focus on the USA, Russia, China and Turkey (given the latters status as a candidate country and its growing international standing as regards providing vital humanitarian assistance to Syrians fleeing violence – although the most important reforms have yet to be carried out in Turkey.)

Parliament considered that enlargement remains an important tool of EU foreign policy and was in the EU’s long-term strategic interest. However, it stressed that enlargement policy needs to take into account the EU’s own integration capacity and the genuine commitment of the Western Balkan countries and of Turkey to take up their responsibilities and address outstanding concerns.

Parliament stressed that the EU needed to put further effort into, place a higher priority on, and show greater commitment to, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) at a time when this policy was in difficulty. It called for the principles underlying the new ENP approach, as set out by the VP/HR and the Commission in the relevant joint communications, in particular the 'more-for-more', differentiation and mutual accountability principles and the 'partnership with society', to be fully operational and for Union assistance to be fully aligned to this new approach. As regards the Southern Neighbourhood, Members called for further actions with the Arab Spring countries.

Parliament regretted the fact that the EU gave up its common policy of an arms embargo on Syria, thereby undermining a common approach on the matter. It invited the Member States to show solidarity and to provide help to refugees from Syria and displaced persons within Syria.

Parliament also made a number of recommendations with a view to strengthening the EU’s position in South Africa, Latin America, Asia and Afghanistan. It called for the EU to have a greater presence in the Asia-Pacific region, with a focus beyond China, India and Japan, and extending particularly to Indonesia and the Philippines.

It called on the EU and the Members States to reconfirm the EU’s commitment to advancing effective multilateralism, with the UN system at its core and called on the VP/HR to take stock of the effectiveness of the EU’s Strategy Against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and its policies for tackling conventional weapons, including arms exports. Lastly, Parliament reiterated its call for the EU to play a more active role in the resolution of the Western Sahara conflict, which currently represented an insurmountable obstacle to the full development of good-neighbourly relations in the Maghreb.

Documents
2013/10/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/10/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/10/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2013/10/15
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2013/10/15
   CSL - Council Meeting
2013/10/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2013/10/10
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/09/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/09/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/06/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/06/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/04/24
   EP - NEYNSKY Nadezhda (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2013/02/19
   EP - BROK Elmar (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
341 2013/2081(INI)
2013/06/07 BUDG 5 amendments...
source: PE-513.235
2013/09/26 AFET 336 amendments...
source: PE-516.926

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3
date
2013-10-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0330_EN.html title: A7-0330/2013
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2013-10-14T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0330_EN.html title: A7-0330/2013
events/3
date
2013-10-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0330_EN.html title: A7-0330/2013
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.794&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-510794_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.554
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-510554_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.926
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-516926_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2013-10-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0330_EN.html title: A7-0330/2013
summary
events/3
date
2013-10-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0330_EN.html title: A7-0330/2013
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131023&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-23-TOC_EN.html
events/6
date
2013-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0453_EN.html title: T7-0453/2013
summary
events/6
date
2013-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0453_EN.html title: T7-0453/2013
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 142-p1
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2013-04-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-330&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0330_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-453
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0453_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BROK Elmar body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda
  • date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BROK Elmar body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3264 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3264*&MEET_DATE=15/10/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3264 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-330&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0330/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131023&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23548&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-453 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0453/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
group: S&D name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: BROK Elmar
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2013-04-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2013-04-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3264 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3264*&MEET_DATE=15/10/2013 date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2013-06-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.794&secondRef=02 title: PE510.794 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.554 title: PE510.554 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.926 title: PE516.926 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3264*&MEET_DATE=15/10/2013 title: 3264
  • date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-330&language=EN title: A7-0330/2013 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) on the Annual Report from the Council to the European Parliament on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Members highlighted that the first quarter of the twenty-first century is characterised by a period of prolonged structural change that is transforming the global order which demands a fresh approach to shaping a new multi-polar world order that is inclusive and underpinned by the rule of law and a pluralist democratic model as well as universal values, including human rights. They noted that many obstacles lie ahead, not least in engaging with emerging powers in reforming the multilateral system. The world financial crisis and the growing assertiveness of new emerging economies pose major political, economic, social, cultural and environmental challenges, including internal problems, for all parties. Members stressed that addressing such challenges requires collective and united EU action . Defend the interests of the EU : Members considered that the EU must defend its citizens' interests in the world in a determined, unified manner, while always basing its policies on the promotion of the fundamental values on which the Union is founded. In this respect, Members underlined the need for EU foreign policy to be flexible in responding to emerging threats and challenges in many areas. The EU needs not only to be coherent and consistent in its external action, but, also develop a common vision. It is for this reason that Members demanded that the instrument of enhanced cooperation be used to secure greater capacity to act, and to overcome the inappropriate use of the veto within the Council. A joint or unified approach should give the EU the strength to pursue its interests and defend its values in this world. Members stressed that the effectiveness of the EU's external action also depends on the full support of its citizens and on the legitimacy it acquires by being anchored in the EU's fundamental values of democracy. They called for Parliament to be regularly informed of foreign policy priorities of the Union. Building a new, comprehensive approach to the EU’s foreign policy : Members urged the Member States to play a constructive role in the Union's foreign and security policy and to improve the Union's effectiveness as a cohesive global actor. The need to develop closer cooperation in order to guarantee military security is stressed. Overall, Members regretted the fact that the EU has not yet developed a clear strategy for its relations with the rest of the world and that its activities are defined more by reaction than by action. They demanded, therefore, a fundamental strategic debate, which should include the Council, the Commission and Parliament and welcomed the European Global Strategy initiative pursued by the foreign ministers of Sweden, Spain, Poland and Italy. Members stated that there should be closer coordination of EU internal policies and Member States' policy choices in key areas such as connectivity, trade, transport, energy, the environment and communication. They called on the Council and the VP/HR to respond to Parliament's recommendation on the 2013 review of the organisation and the functioning of the EEAS in order to ensure the further development of an appropriate structure within the EEAS in which geographic and thematic expertise are integrated and drive a comprehensive approach to policy planning, formulation and implementation. Providing leadership and coherence in EU foreign policy : stressing the political leadership role that the VP/HR is expected to play in ensuring the unity, consistency and effectiveness of Union action, Members congratulated Mrs Ashton her on her success in bringing the parties together in the EU-facilitated dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. They considered that these examples of leadership should be applied to Central Asia to the Middle East and from the Horn of Africa across the Sahel. Members called for a review of the infrastructure distribution and staffing of EU delegations in order to ensure that the Union’s efficiency, visibility and representation in third countries reflects the EU’s political ambitions and expected priorities. They regretted the Council’s rationale for cutting the multiannual financial framework , which will reduce the Union's capacity to promote peace, security and sustainable economic development and its credibility in respect of such efforts. They stressed the importance of ensuring that the new external relations financial instruments under consideration by Parliament and the Council are fully funded, tailored to furthering the Union’s strategic interests. Assessing the achievements of the VP/HR and of the Council in 2011 : Members welcomed the steps taken by the Council, with the VP/HR’s support, in the 2011 Annual Report towards mapping out the Union’s foreign policy in a forward-looking and strategic policy document. They considered, however, the Council’s Annual Report still falls short of the ambitions of the Lisbon Treaty in important ways, and therefore called for the following in future: establish clear priorities and strategic guidelines for the CFSP; set out a framework for assessing existing strategic partners and developing new partnerships, including with international and regional organisations; set out a roadmap for making progress on important innovations of the Lisbon Treaty, in particular (1) by making operational the assignment of special tasks and missions to a core group of Member States , (2) through the establishment by capable and willing Member States of permanent structured cooperation in defence , and (3) by enhancing the role of, and providing more resources for, the European Defence Agency ; address acute problems in CSDP decision-making, inter alia in relation to funding procedures and the financing of operations, that result in incomprehensible delays between the taking of political decisions to launch a mission and the actual deployment of that mission on the ground (Libya and Mali being the most recent in a long line of examples). In this respect, Members called on the Council to request that the VP/HR set out in the next Annual Report her foreign policy objectives for the years 2014 and 2015, along with the timeframe and necessary resources for their implementation. These priorities should focus on the EU’s strategic aims, starting with the transatlantic partnership, the economic and political development of its Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods, and the Middle East Peace Process. They called on the Council and the VP/HR, when drawing up future Annual Reports on the CFSP, to engage with the Committee on Foreign Affairs at an early stage in order to discuss foreign policy objectives for the coming years. Members also welcomed the initiative of holding a European Council Summit in December 2013 . Strategic priorities : Members welcomed the development of ‘strategic partnerships’ as a format for the EU's engagement with both established and emerging powers. These partnerships should focus on: USA in order to cooperate closely with regard to the peaceful resolution of the conflicts and crises arising as a result of Iran’s nuclear programme and the transition process in the Arab Spring countries and the Middle East; Russia in order to strengthen the dialogue with this country with regard to Syria, discrimination of LGBT communities, as well as restricting the freedom of expression; China to further develop its comprehensive, strategic partnership with this country, promoting both parties' global interests, joint projects based on geostrategic standards, and mutual respect; Turkey given its status as a candidate country and its growing international standing as regards providing vital humanitarian assistance to Syrians fleeing violence across the borders. Members considered that enlargement remains an important tool of EU foreign policy and is in the EU’s long-term strategic interest. However, they stressed, that the enlargement policy needs to take into account the EU’s own integration capacity and the genuine commitment of the Western Balkan countries and of Turkey to take up their responsibilities and address outstanding concerns. The report stressed that the EU needs to put further effort into, place a higher priority on, and show greater commitment to, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) at a time when this policy is in difficulty. It called for the principles underlying the new ENP approach, as set out by the VP/HR and the Commission in the relevant joint communications, in particular the 'more-for-more', differentiation and mutual accountability principles and the 'partnership with society', to be fully operational and for Union assistance to be fully aligned to this new approach. As regards the Southern Neighbourhood, Members called for further actions with the Arab Spring countries. Members regretted the fact that the EU gave up its common policy of an arms embargo on Syria, thereby undermining a common approach on the matter. They invited the Member States to show solidarity and to provide help to refugees from Syria and displaced persons within Syria. Members also made a number of recommendations with a view to strengthening the EU’s position in South Africa, Latin America, Asia and Afghanistan. The called on the EU and the Members States to reconfirm the EU’s commitment to advancing effective multilateralism, with the UN system at its core and called on the VP/HR to take stock of the effectiveness of the EU’s Strategy Against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and its policies for tackling conventional weapons, including arms exports. It should be noted that this report is subject to a minority opinion which rejects the approach which is based on promoting the militarisation as the core element in CFSP. It preferred a CFSP based on peaceful principles.
  • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131023&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23548&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-453 title: T7-0453/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 389 votes to 114 with 58 abstentions, a resolution on t he Annual Report from the Council to the European Parliament on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Parliament highlighted the fact that the first quarter of the twenty-first century was characterised by a period of prolonged structural change that was transforming the global order which demanded a fresh approach to shaping a new multi-polar world order that was inclusive and underpinned by the rule of law and a pluralist democratic model as well as universal values, including human rights. It noted that many obstacles lie ahead, not least in engaging with emerging powers in reforming the multilateral system. The world financial crisis and the growing assertiveness of new emerging economies posed major political, economic, social, cultural and environmental challenges, which required collective and united EU action . Defend the interests of the EU : Parliament considered that the EU must defend its citizens' interests in the world in a determined, unified manner, while always basing its policies on the promotion of the fundamental values on which the Union is founded. In this respect, EU foreign policy must be flexible in responding to emerging threats and challenges in many areas. The EU needed not only to be coherent and consistent in its external action, but, also develop a common vision. For this reason, Parliament demanded that the instrument of enhanced cooperation be used to secure greater capacity to act, and to overcome the inappropriate use of the veto within the Council. A joint or unified approach should give the EU the strength to pursue its interests and defend its values in the world. Parliament stressed that the effectiveness of the EU's external action also depends on the full support of its citizens and on the legitimacy it acquires by being anchored in the EU's fundamental values of democracy. It called for Parliament to be regularly informed of foreign policy priorities of the Union. Building a new, comprehensive approach to the EU’s foreign policy : Parliament urged Member States to play a constructive role in the Union's foreign and security policy and to improve the Union's effectiveness as a cohesive global actor. The need to develop closer cooperation in order to guarantee military security is stressed. Overall, Members regretted the fact that the EU had not yet developed a clear strategy for it relations with the rest of the world and that its activities were defined more by reaction than by action. It demanded, therefore, a fundamental strategic debate, which should include the Council, the Commission and Parliament and called, as a contribution to this debate, for the European Council in December to further elaborate on the European Global Strategy initiative. Parliament also stressed that a comprehensive understanding of the CFSP covered all areas of foreign policy, including the progressive framing of the CSDP, which could lead to a common defence. It called on the Council and the VP/HR to respond to Parliament's recommendation on the 2013 review of the organisation and the functioning of the EEAS in order to ensure the further development of an appropriate and gender-balanced structure within the EEAS (with the participation of the relevant Commission services), in which geographic and thematic expertise are integrated and drive a comprehensive approach to policy planning, formulation and implementation. Providing leadership and coherence in EU foreign policy : stressing the political leadership role that the VP/HR is expected to play in ensuring the unity, consistency and effectiveness of Union action, Parliament congratulated Lady Ashton on her success in bringing the parties together in the EU-facilitated dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. It considered that these examples of leadership should be applied to Central Asia to the Middle East and from the Horn of Africa across the Sahel. It called for a review of the infrastructure distribution and staffing of EU delegations in order to ensure that the Union’s efficiency, visibility and representation in third countries reflected the EU’s political ambitions and expected priorities. Parliament regretted the Council’s rationale for cutting the multiannual financial framework , which would reduce the Union's capacity to promote peace, security and sustainable economic development and its credibility in respect of such efforts. It stressed the importance of ensuring that the new external relations financial instruments under consideration by Parliament and the Council were fully funded, tailored to furthering the Union’s strategic interests. Assessing the achievements of the VP/HR and of the Council in 2011 : Parliament welcomed the steps taken by the Council, with the VP/HR’s support, in the 2011 Annual Report towards mapping out the Union’s foreign policy in a forward-looking and strategic policy document. It considered, however, the Council’s Annual Report still falls short of the ambitions of the Lisbon Treaty in important ways, and therefore called for the following in future: establish clear priorities and strategic guidelines for the CFSP; setting out a framework for assessing existing strategic partners and developing new partnerships, including with international and regional organisations; setting out a roadmap for making progress on important innovations of the Lisbon Treaty, in particular (1) by making operational the assignment of special tasks and missions to a core group of Member States , (2) through the establishment by capable and willing Member States of permanent structured cooperation in defence , and (3) by enhancing the role of, and providing more resources for, the European Defence Agency ; addressing acute problems in CSDP decision-making, inter alia in relation to funding procedures and the financing of operations, that result in incomprehensible delays between the taking of political decisions to launch a mission and the actual deployment of that mission on the ground (Libya and Mali being the most recent in a long line of examples). In this respect, Parliament called on the Council to request that the VP/HR set out in the next Annual Report her foreign policy objectives for the years 2014 and 2015, along with the timeframe and necessary resources for their implementation. These priorities should focus on the EU’s strategic aims, starting with the transatlantic partnership, the economic and political development of its Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods, and the Middle East Peace Process. It called on the Council and the VP/HR, when drawing up future Annual Reports on the CFSP, to engage with the Committee on Foreign Affairs at an early stage in order to discuss foreign policy objectives for the coming years. Members also welcomed the initiative of holding a European Council Summit in December 2013. Parliament called for this meeting to deliver a clear roadmap with timelines for achieving key objectives, including, in the first instance, the timely review of the European Security Strategy and the use of a White Book serving as a common template for concurrent national security and defence reviews. It stressed the need to develop closer cooperation in order to guarantee military security and achieve savings. Strategic priorities : Parliament welcomed the development of ‘strategic partnerships’ as a format for the EU's engagement with both established and emerging powers. These partnerships should focus on the USA, Russia, China and Turkey (given the latters status as a candidate country and its growing international standing as regards providing vital humanitarian assistance to Syrians fleeing violence – although the most important reforms have yet to be carried out in Turkey.) Parliament considered that enlargement remains an important tool of EU foreign policy and was in the EU’s long-term strategic interest. However, it stressed that enlargement policy needs to take into account the EU’s own integration capacity and the genuine commitment of the Western Balkan countries and of Turkey to take up their responsibilities and address outstanding concerns. Parliament stressed that the EU needed to put further effort into, place a higher priority on, and show greater commitment to, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) at a time when this policy was in difficulty. It called for the principles underlying the new ENP approach, as set out by the VP/HR and the Commission in the relevant joint communications, in particular the 'more-for-more', differentiation and mutual accountability principles and the 'partnership with society', to be fully operational and for Union assistance to be fully aligned to this new approach. As regards the Southern Neighbourhood, Members called for further actions with the Arab Spring countries. Parliament regretted the fact that the EU gave up its common policy of an arms embargo on Syria, thereby undermining a common approach on the matter. It invited the Member States to show solidarity and to provide help to refugees from Syria and displaced persons within Syria. Parliament also made a number of recommendations with a view to strengthening the EU’s position in South Africa, Latin America, Asia and Afghanistan. It called for the EU to have a greater presence in the Asia-Pacific region, with a focus beyond China, India and Japan, and extending particularly to Indonesia and the Philippines. It called on the EU and the Members States to reconfirm the EU’s commitment to advancing effective multilateralism, with the UN system at its core and called on the VP/HR to take stock of the effectiveness of the EU’s Strategy Against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and its policies for tackling conventional weapons, including arms exports. Lastly, Parliament reiterated its call for the EU to play a more active role in the resolution of the Western Sahara conflict, which currently represented an insurmountable obstacle to the full development of good-neighbourly relations in the Maghreb.
  • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/7/12555
    New
    • AFET/7/12555
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
    procedure/legal_basis/1
    Treaty on European Union TEU 36
    procedure/legal_basis/1
    Treaty on European Union TEU 036
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    New
    6.10
    Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    procedure/title
    Old
    Common Foreign and Security Policy in 2012. Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament
    New
    Common foreign and security policy in 2012. Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament
    activities
    • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BROK Elmar body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda
    • date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BROK Elmar body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 3264 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3264*&MEET_DATE=15/10/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3264 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2013-10-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-330&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0330/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131023&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23548&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-453 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0453/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: PAŞCU Ioan Mircea responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BROK Elmar
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-04-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/7/12555
      reference
      2013/2081(INI)
      title
      Common Foreign and Security Policy in 2012. Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament
      legal_basis
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Annual report
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)