BETA


2013/2095(INI) EU Member States' preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new cohesion policy programming period

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI VAUGHAN Derek (icon: S&D S&D) VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert (icon: PPE PPE), DELLI Karima (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VLASÁK Oldřich (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion BUDG DAERDEN Frédéric (icon: S&D S&D) Richard ASHWORTH (icon: ECR ECR), Helga TRÜPEL (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2014/05/26
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2014/01/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/01/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU Member States preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new Cohesion Policy Programming period.

Parliament emphasised the need to ensure an effective and timely start to the new Cohesion Policy Programming period .

It underlined the satisfactory outcome achieved by the adoption of the multiannual financial framework ( MFF ) for 2014-2020 and the legal framework for cohesion policy with a view to ensuring the swift and effective launch of the new cohesion policy.

In the current economic, financial and social crisis, cohesion policy funding in a number of Member States represents a key source of public investment . This is why the Member States and the regions must tackle, as soon as possible, the implementation of the new round of cohesion policy funding at the start of 2014.

The resolution also pointed out that the backlog of outstanding commitments (or RAL, from the French ‘reste à liquider’) amounted to two-thirds of cohesion policy funding by the end of the MFF for 2007-2013; it stressed the need to find a reliable means of reducing the risk of the implementation of EU programmes being blocked owing to a lack of payments.

Progress in Member States : the Parliament highlighted that Member States are at very different stages in their preparations. Some Member States are dealing with a significant reduction in their budgets for the next programming period while in others there is ongoing debate on the distribution of budgets within the Member States. Parliament recognised that both of these issues could cause a delay in preparations.

According to Members, the Commission should increase its support to ensure that these Member States’ partnership agreements (PAs) and operational programmes (OPs) are agreed as soon as possible. Therefore, reviewing Member States’ progress during the preparation stages would help reduce delays. Furthermore, during the implementation phase, the Commission could come to the rescue of those Member States that are lagging behind .

The resolution stressed that active and well informed national and regional administrations that engage with the Commission could have a positive impact on advancing preparations. Parliament strongly recommends, therefore, that the Commission and the national and regional authorities have a steady flow of information , such as details of upcoming implementing acts.

Common Provisions Regulation : Parliament welcomed the improvements made to the regulation that will introduce a stronger and more integrated approach to cohesion policy funding through the Common Strategic Framework. It called on the Member States to introduce even more measures simplifying the bureaucracy and administration of the programmes.

Members underlined the importance of the Smart Specialisation Strategy , considering that the next programming period will be aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of funding by making funding conditional on compliance with certain criteria. Furthermore, cohesion policy should not serve as a guarantee for other EU policies aimed at macroeconomic reforms in the Membe r States .

Effectiveness of funds : Parliament welcomed the fact many Member States mentioned their focus on a results-led approach . It considered that national operational programmes should take into account development objectives at local and regional level and pointed out that generating synergies between the various sources of available EU funding and the budgets of the Member States and of regional and local authorities should be encouraged.

On the basis of successful experiences from the 2007-2013 round, Parliament welcomed the fact that Member States are seeking to enhance the leveraging of private sector funding in order to open up alternative sources of funding to complement traditional financing methods. It stressed the importance of setting out clear rules for using innovative financial instruments, such as loans, guarantees and equity investments, as complements to grants in order to encourage cooperation between enterprises, public sector organisations and educational institutions.

Synergies with other policies and instruments : Members were encouraged by the fact that some Member States are looking at developing the use of new instruments such as Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) , an excellent way of encouraging bottom-up participation from a cross-section of community actors.

Simplification : Parliament welcomed the positive steps taken towards simplification and greater transparency in the management of European Structural and Investment (ESI) funds; it noted, however, that in reality simplification could be difficult to achieve due to the differences that remain between the funds introduced by the fund-specific regulations.

Members called on Member States and regional and local authorities to exchange best practice geared to simplifying procedures, and, while acknowledging that stringent rules on controls and auditing are necessary, to ensure that they are proportionate so as not to add an unnecessary burden.

Partnership : Parliament e mphasised that the decision-making process and the formulation of PAs must involve collaboration at national, regional and local level in the planning, development and implementation of EU cohesion policy funding programmes. Underlining that the principle of multi-level governance is essential to effective management of the cohesion policy Members stressed the need to involve regional and local authorities and stakeholders fully in the preparation, implementation and evaluation of the programmes.

In this context, they welcomed the increased involvement of all the relevant stakeholders , local and regional representatives, NGOs, economic and social partners, private businesses and universities.

Documents
2014/01/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/01/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on EU Member States preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new Cohesion Policy Programming period.

The report stressed the necessity of ensuring an effective and timely start to the new Cohesion Policy Programming period . Members welcomed the adoption of both the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2014-2020 and the legal framework for cohesion policy

Progress in Member States : the report highlighted that Member States are at very different stages in their preparations.

According to Members, the Commission should increase its support to ensure that these Member States’ partnership agreements (PAs) and operational programmes (OPs) are agreed as soon as possible. Therefore, reviewing Member States’ progress during the preparation stages would help reduce delays. Furthermore, during the implementation phase the Commission could come to the rescue of those Member States that are lagging behind .

The report stressed that active and well informed national and regional administrations that engage with the Commission could have a positive impact on advancing preparations. It strongly recommends, therefore, that the Commission and the national and regional authorities have a steady flow of information , such as details of upcoming implementing acts.

Common Provisions Regulation : the report welcomed the improvements made to the regulation that will introduce a stronger and more integrated approach to cohesion policy funding through the Common Strategic Framework. It called on the Member States to introduce even more measures simplifying the bureaucracy and administration of the programmes .

Members underlined the importance of the Smart Specialisation Strategy , considering that the next programming period will be aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of funding by making funding conditional on compliance with certain criteria.

Effectiveness of funds : Members welcomed the fact many Member States mentioned their focus on a results-led approach . They considered that national operational programmes should take into account development objectives at local and regional level and pointed out that generating synergies between the various sources of available EU funding and the budgets of the Member States and of regional and local authorities should be encouraged.

On the basis of successful experiences from the 2007-2013 round, the Committee welcomed the fact that Member States are seeking to enhance the leveraging of private sector funding in order to open up alternative sources of funding to complement traditional financing methods.

Synergies with other policies and instruments : Members were encouraged by the fact that some Member States are looking at developing the use of new instruments such as Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) , an excellent way of encouraging bottom-up participation from a cross-section of community actors.

Simplification : Members called on Member States and regional and local authorities to exchange best practice geared to simplifying procedures , and, while acknowledging that stringent rules on controls and auditing are necessary, to ensure that they are proportionate so as not to add an unnecessary burden.

Partnership agreements (PAs) : the report underlined the Commission’s call for Member States and regions to strive to ensure that the PAs and OPs prepared are of the highest possible quality. According to the Members, this would help to generate quality project proposals, targeted at specific objectives, ensuring that EU funding has the greatest possible impact.

Underlining that the principle of multi-level governance is essential to effective management of the cohesion policy, Members stressed the need to involve regional and local authorities and stakeholders fully in the preparation, implementation and evaluation of the programmes.

Documents
2013/12/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/11/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/10/21
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/09/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/06/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/05/20
   EP - DAERDEN Frédéric (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2013/03/18
   EP - VAUGHAN Derek (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
93 2013/2095(INI)
2013/10/22 REGI 84 amendments...
source: PE-521.786
2013/10/25 BUDG 9 amendments...
source: PE-522.813

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
ERNST Cornelia
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.777
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-519777_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.786
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-521786_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.799&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-519799_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2014-01-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0007_EN.html title: A7-0007/2014
summary
events/2
date
2014-01-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0007_EN.html title: A7-0007/2014
summary
events/4
date
2014-01-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0015_EN.html title: T7-0015/2014
summary
events/4
date
2014-01-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0015_EN.html title: T7-0015/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek date: 2013-03-18T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2013-03-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: DAERDEN Frédéric date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2013-05-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAERDEN Frédéric group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0007&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0007_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0015
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0015_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: GUE/NGL name: ERNST Cornelia responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2013-03-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
  • date: 2013-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: GUE/NGL name: ERNST Cornelia responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2013-03-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
  • date: 2014-01-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0007&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0007/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23912&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0015 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0015/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HAHN Johannes
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2013-03-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2013-05-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2013-05-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAERDEN Frédéric group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2013-03-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
docs
  • date: 2013-09-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.777 title: PE519.777 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.786 title: PE521.786 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.799&secondRef=02 title: PE519.799 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2014-05-26T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23912&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)320 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-12-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-01-07T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0007&language=EN title: A7-0007/2014 summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on EU Member States preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new Cohesion Policy Programming period. The report stressed the necessity of ensuring an effective and timely start to the new Cohesion Policy Programming period . Members welcomed the adoption of both the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2014-2020 and the legal framework for cohesion policy Progress in Member States : the report highlighted that Member States are at very different stages in their preparations. According to Members, the Commission should increase its support to ensure that these Member States’ partnership agreements (PAs) and operational programmes (OPs) are agreed as soon as possible. Therefore, reviewing Member States’ progress during the preparation stages would help reduce delays. Furthermore, during the implementation phase the Commission could come to the rescue of those Member States that are lagging behind . The report stressed that active and well informed national and regional administrations that engage with the Commission could have a positive impact on advancing preparations. It strongly recommends, therefore, that the Commission and the national and regional authorities have a steady flow of information , such as details of upcoming implementing acts. Common Provisions Regulation : the report welcomed the improvements made to the regulation that will introduce a stronger and more integrated approach to cohesion policy funding through the Common Strategic Framework. It called on the Member States to introduce even more measures simplifying the bureaucracy and administration of the programmes . Members underlined the importance of the Smart Specialisation Strategy , considering that the next programming period will be aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of funding by making funding conditional on compliance with certain criteria. Effectiveness of funds : Members welcomed the fact many Member States mentioned their focus on a results-led approach . They considered that national operational programmes should take into account development objectives at local and regional level and pointed out that generating synergies between the various sources of available EU funding and the budgets of the Member States and of regional and local authorities should be encouraged. On the basis of successful experiences from the 2007-2013 round, the Committee welcomed the fact that Member States are seeking to enhance the leveraging of private sector funding in order to open up alternative sources of funding to complement traditional financing methods. Synergies with other policies and instruments : Members were encouraged by the fact that some Member States are looking at developing the use of new instruments such as Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) , an excellent way of encouraging bottom-up participation from a cross-section of community actors. Simplification : Members called on Member States and regional and local authorities to exchange best practice geared to simplifying procedures , and, while acknowledging that stringent rules on controls and auditing are necessary, to ensure that they are proportionate so as not to add an unnecessary burden. Partnership agreements (PAs) : the report underlined the Commission’s call for Member States and regions to strive to ensure that the PAs and OPs prepared are of the highest possible quality. According to the Members, this would help to generate quality project proposals, targeted at specific objectives, ensuring that EU funding has the greatest possible impact. Underlining that the principle of multi-level governance is essential to effective management of the cohesion policy, Members stressed the need to involve regional and local authorities and stakeholders fully in the preparation, implementation and evaluation of the programmes.
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23912&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0015 title: T7-0015/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU Member States preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new Cohesion Policy Programming period. Parliament emphasised the need to ensure an effective and timely start to the new Cohesion Policy Programming period . It underlined the satisfactory outcome achieved by the adoption of the multiannual financial framework ( MFF ) for 2014-2020 and the legal framework for cohesion policy with a view to ensuring the swift and effective launch of the new cohesion policy. In the current economic, financial and social crisis, cohesion policy funding in a number of Member States represents a key source of public investment . This is why the Member States and the regions must tackle, as soon as possible, the implementation of the new round of cohesion policy funding at the start of 2014. The resolution also pointed out that the backlog of outstanding commitments (or RAL, from the French ‘reste à liquider’) amounted to two-thirds of cohesion policy funding by the end of the MFF for 2007-2013; it stressed the need to find a reliable means of reducing the risk of the implementation of EU programmes being blocked owing to a lack of payments. Progress in Member States : the Parliament highlighted that Member States are at very different stages in their preparations. Some Member States are dealing with a significant reduction in their budgets for the next programming period while in others there is ongoing debate on the distribution of budgets within the Member States. Parliament recognised that both of these issues could cause a delay in preparations. According to Members, the Commission should increase its support to ensure that these Member States’ partnership agreements (PAs) and operational programmes (OPs) are agreed as soon as possible. Therefore, reviewing Member States’ progress during the preparation stages would help reduce delays. Furthermore, during the implementation phase, the Commission could come to the rescue of those Member States that are lagging behind . The resolution stressed that active and well informed national and regional administrations that engage with the Commission could have a positive impact on advancing preparations. Parliament strongly recommends, therefore, that the Commission and the national and regional authorities have a steady flow of information , such as details of upcoming implementing acts. Common Provisions Regulation : Parliament welcomed the improvements made to the regulation that will introduce a stronger and more integrated approach to cohesion policy funding through the Common Strategic Framework. It called on the Member States to introduce even more measures simplifying the bureaucracy and administration of the programmes. Members underlined the importance of the Smart Specialisation Strategy , considering that the next programming period will be aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of funding by making funding conditional on compliance with certain criteria. Furthermore, cohesion policy should not serve as a guarantee for other EU policies aimed at macroeconomic reforms in the Membe r States . Effectiveness of funds : Parliament welcomed the fact many Member States mentioned their focus on a results-led approach . It considered that national operational programmes should take into account development objectives at local and regional level and pointed out that generating synergies between the various sources of available EU funding and the budgets of the Member States and of regional and local authorities should be encouraged. On the basis of successful experiences from the 2007-2013 round, Parliament welcomed the fact that Member States are seeking to enhance the leveraging of private sector funding in order to open up alternative sources of funding to complement traditional financing methods. It stressed the importance of setting out clear rules for using innovative financial instruments, such as loans, guarantees and equity investments, as complements to grants in order to encourage cooperation between enterprises, public sector organisations and educational institutions. Synergies with other policies and instruments : Members were encouraged by the fact that some Member States are looking at developing the use of new instruments such as Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) , an excellent way of encouraging bottom-up participation from a cross-section of community actors. Simplification : Parliament welcomed the positive steps taken towards simplification and greater transparency in the management of European Structural and Investment (ESI) funds; it noted, however, that in reality simplification could be difficult to achieve due to the differences that remain between the funds introduced by the fund-specific regulations. Members called on Member States and regional and local authorities to exchange best practice geared to simplifying procedures, and, while acknowledging that stringent rules on controls and auditing are necessary, to ensure that they are proportionate so as not to add an unnecessary burden. Partnership : Parliament e mphasised that the decision-making process and the formulation of PAs must involve collaboration at national, regional and local level in the planning, development and implementation of EU cohesion policy funding programmes. Underlining that the principle of multi-level governance is essential to effective management of the cohesion policy Members stressed the need to involve regional and local authorities and stakeholders fully in the preparation, implementation and evaluation of the programmes. In this context, they welcomed the increased involvement of all the relevant stakeholders , local and regional representatives, NGOs, economic and social partners, private businesses and universities.
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HAHN Johannes
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/7/12767
New
  • REGI/7/12767
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund
New
4.70.02
Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
procedure/title
Old
EU Member States' preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new Cohesion Policy programming period
New
EU Member States' preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new cohesion policy programming period
other/0/dg/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000
New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000
New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000
New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b
procedure/subject/0
Old
4.70.02 Cohesion, Cohesion Fund
New
4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: GUE/NGL name: ERNST Cornelia responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2013-03-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
  • date: 2013-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: GUE/NGL name: ERNST Cornelia responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2013-03-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
  • date: 2014-01-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0007&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0007/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23912&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0015 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0015/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: DAERDEN Frédéric
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: GUE/NGL name: ERNST Cornelia responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2013-03-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy commissioner: HAHN Johannes
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/7/12767
reference
2013/2095(INI)
title
EU Member States' preparedness to an effective and timely start of the new Cohesion Policy programming period
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.70.02 Cohesion, Cohesion Fund