BETA


2013/2096(INI) Future of small agricultural holdings

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AGRI SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam (icon: PPE PPE) DANELLIS Spyros (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2014/06/18
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2014/02/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/02/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future of small agricultural holdings.

Small agricultural holdings in Europe are subject to sustained demographic, commercial and technological pressure, which is leading to the gradual de-agrarianisation and depopulation of villages in areas in which such holdings predominate.

These smallholdings represent a model of social agriculture which is still predominant in the EU and which can and must coexist with other, more large-scale and market-oriented models of agriculture.

In this context, Parliament made the following recommendations:

Better use of all tools to help small farmers : according to the Parliament, small agricultural holdings are not given sufficient consideration under the common agricultural policy (CAP). The reasons for this includes the fact that the structure of CAP support is principally based on surface area and past production levels, and is therefore unable to respond suitably to the situation and function of small agricultural holdings.

It is for this reason, according to Members, that a broader approach is needed to address the problems of small agricultural holdings. Support for possible alternative incomes and the prospect of diversification, as well as the creation of non-agricultural jobs and the provision of public services in rural areas are vital for the future of small agricultural holdings and rural communities.

Member States often create unnecessary red tape’ and certain smallholders not having the necessary resources and experience to follow the relevant administrative processes effectively.

The Member States and the Commission are called upon to take appropriate action under the new common agricultural policy and draw up guidelines for the period beyond 2020 in which greater attention is paid to the specific needs of small family holdings.

Member States should:

come up with appropriate solutions and development models for smallholdings in order to boost the competitiveness, viability and profitability of smallholdings, to foster entrepreneurship, to create jobs and to curb rural depopulation; deploy efficiently available EU funding to promote infrastructure, educational, medical and nursing facilities, childcare, access to high-speed internet and the establishment and development of rural small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), so as to ensure equivalent living conditions in urban and rural areas.

Members recommended that efforts be focused on the creation of sustainable future prospects for young people, the well educated and women.

Direct sales of products : Parliament called for an increase in direct sales – such as sales of traditional products – on local and regional markets, and for the development on smallholdings of a sustainable, responsible form of processing and an essential and proportionate monitoring system.

In this context, the Commission and the Member States are encouraged to:

review the existing provisions on food safety with a view to reducing burdens and eliminating the obstacles that they may cause for the development of food processing and sales by small agricultural holdings; establish a platform for the exchange of best practices on how to regulate and monitor the processing carried out by small agricultural holdings.

Complementarity with existing EU policies : Members stated that, in the process of solving the problems of small agricultural holdings, other EU policies, including the cohesion policy , must be brought in alongside the CAP to help improve technical infrastructure and access to public services in rural areas, whilst resources from the European Social Fund should be used to finance community and social action. Since these smallholdings do not have a significant impact on the market, Members considered that permission could be given for additional support to be provided from national resources in line with rules agreed upon with the Commission and without hindering competition .

Welcoming the fact that the support scheme for small-scale farmers has been established under the first pillar of the CAP, Members, on the other hand, took the view that it is only the form of transfer which has been simplified, whilst the low direct-payment rates allow no room for development , and that these measures are still insufficient to improve the situation of smallholdings in the EU. The report suggested that a mechanism should be established which would enable small agricultural holdings to submit multiannual applications for direct payments , with such applications being updated only in the event where changes to the holding in question occur.

Member States are called upon to establish appropriate financial instruments , for example in the shape of microcredit , subsidised interest rates on loans, financial leasing, first instalment repayments or credit guarantees. Smallholdings need to come together to form organisations, producers’ groups or cooperatives and mount joint marketing campaigns which should receive special support under EU and national mechanisms.

Information to smallholdings : the resolution noted that it is difficult for smallholders to secure financial support given that they may, for example, have problems in accessing EU programme funding due to their inability to meet the capital and/or capacity requirements for eligibility. In certain cases smallholders do not receive enough administrative support or good quality advice. Member States often create unnecessary red tape and certain smallholders not having the necessary resources and experience to follow the relevant administrative processes effectively. Members called for free advice to be better tailored to the needs of smallholdings, for procedures relating to information, training, risk assessment and health surveillance to be simplified , for information campaigns to be mounted, for the sharing of best practices where the short food supply chain is concerned and for technical assistance to be provided to help those applying for EU funding, as well as for advice that helps smallholdings to adapt the profile of their production activity to their production and environmental potential.

Documents
2014/02/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/02/03
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2014/01/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the own-initiative report by Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI (EPP, PL) on the future of small agricultural holdings.

The report noted that small agricultural holdings in Europe are subject to sustained demographic, commercial and technological pressure, which is leading to the gradual de-agrarianisation and depopulation of villages in areas in which such holdings predominate.

These smallholdings represent a model of social agriculture which is still predominant in the EU and which can and must coexist with other, more large-scale and market-oriented models of agriculture.

Financial and administrative difficulties : according to the report, small agricultural holdings are not given sufficient consideration under the common agricultural policy (CAP). The reasons for this includes the fact that the structure of CAP support is principally based on surface area and past production levels, and is therefore unable to respond suitably to the situation and function of small agricultural holdings. It is difficult for smallholders to secure financial support given that they may, for example, have problems in accessing EU programme funding due to their inability to meet the capital and/or capacity requirements for eligibility.

A broader approach is needed to address the problems of small agricultural holdings. Support for possible alternative incomes and the prospect of diversification, as well as the creation of non-agricultural jobs and the provision of public services in rural areas are vital for the future of small agricultural holdings and rural communities.

Member States often create unnecessary red tape’ and certain smallholders not having the necessary resources and experience to follow the relevant administrative processes effectively.

The Member States and the Commission are called upon to take appropriate action under the new common agricultural policy and draw up guidelines for the period beyond 2020 in which greater attention is paid to the specific needs of small family holdings.

Member States should come up with appropriate solutions and development models for smallholdings in order to boost the competitiveness, viability and profitability of smallholdings, to foster entrepreneurship, to create jobs and to curb rural depopulation. They should also deploy efficiently available EU funding to promote infrastructure, educational, medical and nursing facilities, childcare, access to high-speed internet and the establishment and development of rural small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), so as to ensure equivalent living conditions in urban and rural areas; recommends that efforts be focused on the creation of sustainable future prospects for young people, the well educated and women.

Direct sales of products : the report called for an increase in direct sales – such as sales of traditional products – on local and regional markets, and for the development on smallholdings of a sustainable, responsible form of processing and an essential and proportionate monitoring system. In this context, the Commission and the Member States are encouraged to review the existing provisions on food safety with a view to reducing burdens and eliminating the obstacles that they may cause for the development of food processing and sales by small agricultural holdings.

A platform for the exchange of best practices on how to regulate and monitor the processing carried out by small agricultural holdings should be established.

Complementarity with existing EU policies : Members stated that, in the process of solving the problems of small agricultural holdings, other EU policies, including the cohesion policy, must be brought in alongside the CAP to help improve technical infrastructure and access to public services in rural areas, whilst resources from the European Social Fund should be used to finance community and social action. Since these smallholdings do not have a significant impact on the market, Members considered that permission could be given for additional support to be provided from national resources in line with rules agreed upon with the Commission and without hindering competition .

Welcoming the fact that the support scheme for small-scale farmers has been established under the first pillar of the CAP, Members, on the other hand, took the view that it is only the form of transfer which has been simplified, whilst the low direct-payment rates allow no room for development , and that these measures are still insufficient to improve the situation of smallholdings in the EU. The report suggested that a mechanism should be established which would enable small agricultural holdings to submit multiannual applications for direct payments , with such applications being updated only in the event where changes to the holding in question occur.

Member States are called upon to establish appropriate financial instruments, for example in the shape of microcredit , subsidised interest rates on loans, financial leasing, first instalment repayments or credit guarantees.

Information to smallholdings : Members called for free advice to be better tailored to the needs of smallholdings, for procedures relating to information, training, risk assessment and health surveillance to be simplified, for information campaigns to be mounted, for the sharing of best practices where the short food supply chain is concerned and for technical assistance to be provided to help those applying for EU funding, as well as for advice that helps smallholdings to adapt the profile of their production activity to their production and environmental potential.

Documents
2013/12/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/11/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/10/14
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/06/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/01/31
   EP - SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
121 2013/2096(INI)
2013/11/12 AGRI 121 amendments...
source: PE-514.771

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-02-03-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.769
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-PR-514769_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.771
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AM-514771_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2014-01-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0029_EN.html title: A7-0029/2014
summary
events/2
date
2014-01-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0029_EN.html title: A7-0029/2014
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140203&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2014-02-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0066_EN.html title: T7-0066/2014
summary
events/5
date
2014-02-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0066_EN.html title: T7-0066/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: DANELLIS Spyros group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: DANELLIS Spyros group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0029&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0029_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0066
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0066_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DANELLIS Spyros responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam
  • date: 2013-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DANELLIS Spyros responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0029&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0029/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140203&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23963&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0066 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0066/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: DANELLIS Spyros group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
group: S&D name: DANELLIS Spyros
responsible
True
committee
AGRI
date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam
docs
  • date: 2013-10-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.769 title: PE514.769 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.771 title: PE514.771 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2014-06-18T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23963&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)414 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-12-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0029&language=EN title: A7-0029/2014 summary: The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the own-initiative report by Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI (EPP, PL) on the future of small agricultural holdings. The report noted that small agricultural holdings in Europe are subject to sustained demographic, commercial and technological pressure, which is leading to the gradual de-agrarianisation and depopulation of villages in areas in which such holdings predominate. These smallholdings represent a model of social agriculture which is still predominant in the EU and which can and must coexist with other, more large-scale and market-oriented models of agriculture. Financial and administrative difficulties : according to the report, small agricultural holdings are not given sufficient consideration under the common agricultural policy (CAP). The reasons for this includes the fact that the structure of CAP support is principally based on surface area and past production levels, and is therefore unable to respond suitably to the situation and function of small agricultural holdings. It is difficult for smallholders to secure financial support given that they may, for example, have problems in accessing EU programme funding due to their inability to meet the capital and/or capacity requirements for eligibility. A broader approach is needed to address the problems of small agricultural holdings. Support for possible alternative incomes and the prospect of diversification, as well as the creation of non-agricultural jobs and the provision of public services in rural areas are vital for the future of small agricultural holdings and rural communities. Member States often create unnecessary red tape’ and certain smallholders not having the necessary resources and experience to follow the relevant administrative processes effectively. The Member States and the Commission are called upon to take appropriate action under the new common agricultural policy and draw up guidelines for the period beyond 2020 in which greater attention is paid to the specific needs of small family holdings. Member States should come up with appropriate solutions and development models for smallholdings in order to boost the competitiveness, viability and profitability of smallholdings, to foster entrepreneurship, to create jobs and to curb rural depopulation. They should also deploy efficiently available EU funding to promote infrastructure, educational, medical and nursing facilities, childcare, access to high-speed internet and the establishment and development of rural small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), so as to ensure equivalent living conditions in urban and rural areas; recommends that efforts be focused on the creation of sustainable future prospects for young people, the well educated and women. Direct sales of products : the report called for an increase in direct sales – such as sales of traditional products – on local and regional markets, and for the development on smallholdings of a sustainable, responsible form of processing and an essential and proportionate monitoring system. In this context, the Commission and the Member States are encouraged to review the existing provisions on food safety with a view to reducing burdens and eliminating the obstacles that they may cause for the development of food processing and sales by small agricultural holdings. A platform for the exchange of best practices on how to regulate and monitor the processing carried out by small agricultural holdings should be established. Complementarity with existing EU policies : Members stated that, in the process of solving the problems of small agricultural holdings, other EU policies, including the cohesion policy, must be brought in alongside the CAP to help improve technical infrastructure and access to public services in rural areas, whilst resources from the European Social Fund should be used to finance community and social action. Since these smallholdings do not have a significant impact on the market, Members considered that permission could be given for additional support to be provided from national resources in line with rules agreed upon with the Commission and without hindering competition . Welcoming the fact that the support scheme for small-scale farmers has been established under the first pillar of the CAP, Members, on the other hand, took the view that it is only the form of transfer which has been simplified, whilst the low direct-payment rates allow no room for development , and that these measures are still insufficient to improve the situation of smallholdings in the EU. The report suggested that a mechanism should be established which would enable small agricultural holdings to submit multiannual applications for direct payments , with such applications being updated only in the event where changes to the holding in question occur. Member States are called upon to establish appropriate financial instruments, for example in the shape of microcredit , subsidised interest rates on loans, financial leasing, first instalment repayments or credit guarantees. Information to smallholdings : Members called for free advice to be better tailored to the needs of smallholdings, for procedures relating to information, training, risk assessment and health surveillance to be simplified, for information campaigns to be mounted, for the sharing of best practices where the short food supply chain is concerned and for technical assistance to be provided to help those applying for EU funding, as well as for advice that helps smallholdings to adapt the profile of their production activity to their production and environmental potential.
  • date: 2014-02-03T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140203&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-02-04T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23963&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-02-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0066 title: T7-0066/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future of small agricultural holdings. Small agricultural holdings in Europe are subject to sustained demographic, commercial and technological pressure, which is leading to the gradual de-agrarianisation and depopulation of villages in areas in which such holdings predominate. These smallholdings represent a model of social agriculture which is still predominant in the EU and which can and must coexist with other, more large-scale and market-oriented models of agriculture. In this context, Parliament made the following recommendations: Better use of all tools to help small farmers : according to the Parliament, small agricultural holdings are not given sufficient consideration under the common agricultural policy (CAP). The reasons for this includes the fact that the structure of CAP support is principally based on surface area and past production levels, and is therefore unable to respond suitably to the situation and function of small agricultural holdings. It is for this reason, according to Members, that a broader approach is needed to address the problems of small agricultural holdings. Support for possible alternative incomes and the prospect of diversification, as well as the creation of non-agricultural jobs and the provision of public services in rural areas are vital for the future of small agricultural holdings and rural communities. Member States often create unnecessary red tape’ and certain smallholders not having the necessary resources and experience to follow the relevant administrative processes effectively. The Member States and the Commission are called upon to take appropriate action under the new common agricultural policy and draw up guidelines for the period beyond 2020 in which greater attention is paid to the specific needs of small family holdings. Member States should: come up with appropriate solutions and development models for smallholdings in order to boost the competitiveness, viability and profitability of smallholdings, to foster entrepreneurship, to create jobs and to curb rural depopulation; deploy efficiently available EU funding to promote infrastructure, educational, medical and nursing facilities, childcare, access to high-speed internet and the establishment and development of rural small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), so as to ensure equivalent living conditions in urban and rural areas. Members recommended that efforts be focused on the creation of sustainable future prospects for young people, the well educated and women. Direct sales of products : Parliament called for an increase in direct sales – such as sales of traditional products – on local and regional markets, and for the development on smallholdings of a sustainable, responsible form of processing and an essential and proportionate monitoring system. In this context, the Commission and the Member States are encouraged to: review the existing provisions on food safety with a view to reducing burdens and eliminating the obstacles that they may cause for the development of food processing and sales by small agricultural holdings; establish a platform for the exchange of best practices on how to regulate and monitor the processing carried out by small agricultural holdings. Complementarity with existing EU policies : Members stated that, in the process of solving the problems of small agricultural holdings, other EU policies, including the cohesion policy , must be brought in alongside the CAP to help improve technical infrastructure and access to public services in rural areas, whilst resources from the European Social Fund should be used to finance community and social action. Since these smallholdings do not have a significant impact on the market, Members considered that permission could be given for additional support to be provided from national resources in line with rules agreed upon with the Commission and without hindering competition . Welcoming the fact that the support scheme for small-scale farmers has been established under the first pillar of the CAP, Members, on the other hand, took the view that it is only the form of transfer which has been simplified, whilst the low direct-payment rates allow no room for development , and that these measures are still insufficient to improve the situation of smallholdings in the EU. The report suggested that a mechanism should be established which would enable small agricultural holdings to submit multiannual applications for direct payments , with such applications being updated only in the event where changes to the holding in question occur. Member States are called upon to establish appropriate financial instruments , for example in the shape of microcredit , subsidised interest rates on loans, financial leasing, first instalment repayments or credit guarantees. Smallholdings need to come together to form organisations, producers’ groups or cooperatives and mount joint marketing campaigns which should receive special support under EU and national mechanisms. Information to smallholdings : the resolution noted that it is difficult for smallholders to secure financial support given that they may, for example, have problems in accessing EU programme funding due to their inability to meet the capital and/or capacity requirements for eligibility. In certain cases smallholders do not receive enough administrative support or good quality advice. Member States often create unnecessary red tape and certain smallholders not having the necessary resources and experience to follow the relevant administrative processes effectively. Members called for free advice to be better tailored to the needs of smallholdings, for procedures relating to information, training, risk assessment and health surveillance to be simplified , for information campaigns to be mounted, for the sharing of best practices where the short food supply chain is concerned and for technical assistance to be provided to help those applying for EU funding, as well as for advice that helps smallholdings to adapt the profile of their production activity to their production and environmental potential.
  • date: 2014-02-04T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AGRI/7/11977
New
  • AGRI/7/11977
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.10.01 Agricultural structures and holdings, farmers
New
3.10.01
Agricultural structures and holdings, farmers
activities
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DANELLIS Spyros responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam
  • date: 2013-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DANELLIS Spyros responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0029&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0029/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140203&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23963&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0066 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0066/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DANELLIS Spyros responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AGRI/7/11977
reference
2013/2096(INI)
title
Future of small agricultural holdings
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
3.10.01 Agricultural structures and holdings, farmers