Next event: Results of vote in Parliament 2014/01/14 more...
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2014/01/14
- End of procedure in Parliament 2014/01/14
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2013/12/06
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2013/11/28
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/11/27
- Committee opinion 2013/10/18
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/10/10
- Contribution 2013/09/25
Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | PRODI Vittorio ( S&D) | ANTONESCU Elena Oana ( PPE), PANAYOTOV Vladko Todorov ( ALDE), AUKEN Margrete ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | LAMBERT Jean ( Verts/ALE) | Patrick LE HYARIC ( GUE/NGL), Csaba SÓGOR ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052
Legal Basis:
RoP 052Subjects
- 3.40.01 Chemical industry, fertilizers, plastics
- 3.70.05 Marine and coastal pollution, pollution from ships, oil pollution
- 3.70.09 Transfrontier pollution
- 3.70.12 Waste management, domestic waste, packaging, light industrial waste
- 3.70.13 Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
- 3.70.18 International and regional environment protection measures and agreements
- 6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on a European strategy on plastic waste in the environment. It welcomed the Commission’s Green Paper, noting that plastic materials were accumulating in large quantities (a total of 80 MT is estimated to be floating in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans) and persisted in the environment for hundreds of years, killing marine life, provoking toxic reactions and releasing endocrine disrupters. Members noted that poor implementation and enforcement of EU waste legislation by Member States , lack of relevant targets and price mechanisms, insufficient internal demand for recycled materials, illegal dumping, illegal exports and improper storage, had led to significant global damage to human health and the environment, and to increased exports of waste, resulting in loss of materials and employment in the EU. Parliament pointed out that points out that full implementation of EU waste legislation could save EUR 72 billion a year, increase the annual turnover of the EU waste management and recycling sector by EUR 42 billion, and create over 400 000 jobs by 2020.
Given that some 40 % of plastic waste derives from packaging and mostly from single-use products, it was necessary to revise the Packaging Directive . Furthermore, Members noted that the economic potential for recycling of plastic waste was currently much higher than the 33 % achieved with regard to plastic packaging waste and the 25 % achieved with regard to total plastic waste.
Parliament proposed that the EU legislation on plastic waste should aim first at its reduction, and should therefore be revised in order to include:
· specific binding targets for collection, sorting (which could reach the ambitious level of 80 %) and recycling of the various plastic waste streams and mandatory criteria for recyclability (clarifying the distinctions between mechanical/organic recycling and recovery/incineration). The aim should be a progressive and ambitious target for recycled plastic free from hazardous additives that are no longer allowed to be used in new products, to be reached by 2020 ;
· the EU-wide harmonisation of criteria for collection, sorting and general waste management, with a view to creating a level playing field in accordance with the waste hierarchy, including the removal of technical, regulatory, administrative and financial barriers to recycling;
· specific labelling of materials in order to inform consumers concerning mechanical or organic recyclability of products, together with indications for consumers on how to increase sorting and recycling; and
· criteria for the replacement of single-use and short-lived plastic products by reusable and more durable materials.
Members also called on the Commission to make proposals by 2014 to phase out the landfilling of recyclable and recoverable waste by 2020, without, however, incentivising as a result the energy recovery option over recycling, and ensuring that environmental efficiency criteria are applied to all options. Plastic waste should be used for energy recovery only in cases where all other possibilities had been exhausted and where the technology used included the requisite purification systems for preventing environmental damage and harm to human health.
Alongside the targets mentioned above for recycling, it was essential to introduce appropriate measures discouraging incineration of recyclable, compostable and biodegradable plastics, in order to optimise the life-cycle of each plastic type while respecting the waste hierarchy. Members asked the Commission to propose measures relating to design that improve the overall environmental impact of products. Furthermore, Parliament considered that:
· the most dangerous plastics (such as micro- and oxo-biodegradable plastics) and those which contain heavy metals should be phased out of the market or banned outright, as soon as possible before 2020 to in order develop a market for reused and recycled materials, and separate collection of these should be immediately implemented;
· as demanded by a majority of European citizens and consumers, the use of single-use, non-recyclable, non-biodegradable and non-compostable plastic bags should be radically reduced and where possible phased out.
Members called for more public and private investment in research and technologies aimed at obtaining more sustainable plastics and for enhanced plastic biodegradation processes, waste sorting methods, processing and mechanical recycling, recovery of plastics from oceans, eco-design and smart packaging. Horizon 2020 could offer opportunities to respond to this important societal need and advantages include the creation of new economic activities.
Parliament also called for the following:
· more public procurement tenders , including those of the European institutions, to include clear demands as regards the recycling of plastic waste as well as favouring the use of recycled plastic where possible;
· bolder steps to tackle illegal exports and dumping of plastic waste, including stricter enforcement of EU shipment regulations, as well as stricter inspection schemes at ports and at all waste treatment facilities, targeting suspected illegal transfers;
· the financing of waste recycling infrastructure to take priority over the financing of waste dumping and incineration, with greater efforts incentivise citizens and businesses to adopt a circular economy concept with regard to plastic waste;
· concrete actions and campaigns such as the establishment of a European Day for plastic waste , when citizens could return any volume of plastic waste to predetermined points;
· stepping up dialogue with third countries , such as those with Black Sea territorial waters, in order to address the problem of marine plastic litter more effectively;
· local and regional authorities to coordinate public service provisions with environmental targets and objectives in order to achieve multiple objectives and stimulate green jobs in the process.
Lastly, Parliament regarded identifying the fut ure needs of the labour market as a priority , and emphasised that appropriate levels of training and skills we re needed for eco-innovations to flourish and for EU waste legislation to be correctly imp lemented. It recommended that the Member States integrate the circular economy model in their professional training schemes, and recalled that, by promoting vocational training and work-based learning, the European Social Fund could help satisfy the demand for sustainable quality jobs in less resource-intensive industries, in line with the Social Investment Package presented by the Commission in February 2013.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report by Vittorio PRODI (S&D, IT) on a European strategy on plastic waste in the environment. It welcomed the Commission’s Green Paper, noting that plastic materials were becoming increasingly diverse and accumulated in large quantities (a total of 80 MT is estimated to be floating in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans) and persisted in the environment for hundreds of years, killing marine life, provoking toxic reactions and releasing endocrine disrupters. Members noted that poor implementation and enforcement of EU waste legislation by Member States , lack of relevant targets and price mechanisms, insufficient internal demand for recycled materials, illegal dumping, illegal exports and improper storage, had led to significant global damage to human health and the environment, and to increased exports of waste, resulting in loss of materials and employment in the EU.
Accordingly, it was necessary as a matter of urgency to revise Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste and propose plastic waste norms that go beyond product rules and standards, and the report proposed that the EU legislation on plastic waste should aim first at its reduction, and should therefore be revised in order to include:
specific binding targets for collection, sorting (which could reach the ambitious level of 80 %) and recycling of the various plastic waste streams and mandatory criteria for recyclability (clarifying the distinctions between mechanical/organic recycling and recovery/incineration). The aim should be a progressive and ambitious target for recycled plastic free from hazardous additives that are no longer allowed to be used in new products, to be reached by 2020 ; the EU-wide harmonisation of criteria for collection, sorting and general waste management, with a view to creating a level playing field in accordance with the waste hierarchy, including the removal of technical, regulatory, administrative and financial barriers to recycling; specific labelling of materials in order to inform consumers concerning mechanical or organic recyclability of products, together with indications for consumers on how to increase sorting and recycling; and criteria for the replacement of single-use and short-lived plastic products by reusable and more durable materials.
Members also called on the Commission to make proposals by 2014 to phase out the landfilling of recyclable and recoverable waste by 2020, without, however, incentivising as a result the energy recovery option over recycling, and ensuring that environmental efficiency criteria are applied to all options. Plastic waste should be used for energy recovery only in cases where all other possibilities had been exhausted and where the technology used included the requisite purification systems for preventing environmental damage and harm to human health.
Alongside the targets mentioned above for recycling, it was essential to introduce appropriate measures discouraging incineration of recyclable, compostable and biodegradable plastics, in order to optimise the life-cycle of each plastic type while respecting the waste hierarchy. Members asked the Commission to propose measures relating to design that improve the overall environmental impact of products. Furthermore, the report considered that:
the most dangerous plastics (such as micro- and oxo-biodegradable plastics) and those which contain heavy metals should be phased out of the market or banned outright, as soon as possible before 2020 to in order develop a market for reused and recycled materials, and separate collection of these should be immediately implemented; as demanded by a majority of European citizens and consumers, the use of single-use, non-recyclable, non-biodegradable and non-compostable plastic bags should be radically reduced and where possible phased out.
Members called for more public and private investment in research and technologies aimed at obtaining more sustainable plastics and for enhanced plastic biodegradation processes, waste sorting methods, processing and mechanical recycling, recovery of plastics from oceans, eco-design and smart packaging. Horizon 2020 could offer opportunities to respond to this important societal need and advantages include the creation of new economic activities. The committee pointed out that points out that full implementation of EU waste legislation could save EUR 72 billion a year, increase the annual turnover of the EU waste management and recycling sector by EUR 42 billion, and create over 400 000 jobs by 2020.
The report also called for the following:
more public procurement tenders , including those of the European institutions, to include clear demands as regards the recycling of plastic waste as well as favouring the use of recycled plastic where possible; bolder steps to tackle illegal exports and dumping of plastic waste, including stricter enforcement of EU shipment regulations, as well as stricter inspection schemes at ports and at all waste treatment facilities, targeting suspected illegal transfers; the financing of waste recycling infrastructure to take priority over the financing of waste dumping and incineration, with greater efforts incentivise citizens and businesses to adopt a circular economy concept with regard to plastic waste; concrete actions and campaigns such as the establishment of a European Day for plastic waste , when citizens could return any volume of plastic waste to predetermined points; stepping up dialogue with third countries , such as those with Black Sea territorial waters, in order to address the problem of marine plastic litter more effectively; local and regional authorities to coordinate public service provisions with environmental targets and objectives in order to achieve multiple objectives and stimulate green jobs in the process.
Lastly, Members recommended that the Member States integrate the circular economy model in their professional training schemes, and recalled that, by promoting vocational training and work-based learning, the European Social Fund could help satisfy the demand for sustainable quality jobs in less resource-intensive industries, in line with the Social Investment Package presented by the Commission in February 2013.
PURPOSE: to launch a debate on how to improve the durability of plastic products throughout their life-cycle and to reduce the impact of plastics waste on the environment (Commission Green Paper).
BACKGROUND: global plastics production grew from 1.5 million tonnes (Mt) per annum in 1950 to 245 Mt in 2008, with 60 Mt in Europe alone. It is estimated (under a business as usual scenario) that 66.5 Mt of plastic will be placed on the EU market in 2020 and global plastic production could triple by 2050. In the European Union (EU 27), it is estimated that around 25 Mt of plastic waste was generated in 2008. Of this 12.1 Mt (48.7%) was landfilled while 12.8 Mt (51.3%) went to recovery, and only 5.3 Mt (21.3%) was recycled .
Once in the environment - particularly in the marine environment - plastic waste can persist for hundreds of years. Harm to the coastal and marine environment and to aquatic life follows from the 10 million tonnes of litter , mostly plastic, which end up in the world's oceans and seas annually. Waste patches in the Atlantic and the Pacific oceans are estimated to be in the order of 100 Mt, about 80% of which is plastic.
Plastic waste is not specifically addressed by EU legislation despite its growing environmental impact . The Framework Directive on waste ( 2008/98/EC ) sets a general recycling target for household waste which covers, among other materials, plastic waste. The need to continue efforts to reduce the incidence and impacts of plastic in the marine environment was particularly highlighted at the Rio+20 Summit.
CONTENT: the purpose of this Green Paper is to launch a broad reflection on possible responses to the public policy challenges posed by plastic waste .
The document highlights the opportunities that can arise from the improved management of plastic waste. It stresses, in particular, that enhanced recycling could contribute to the aims of the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe , adopted in 2011, and help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and imports of raw materials and fossil fuels.
Appropriately designed measures to recycle plastic can also improve competitiveness and create new economic activities and jobs.
The Green Paper should help to:
reassess the environmental and human health risk of plastic in products when they become waste, addressing their environmentally sound design, both functionally and chemically; open a reflection process on how to tackle the problem of uncontrolled disposal of plastic waste and marine litter; move forward the reflection on internalization of life-cycle impacts, from raw material extraction to the end of life phase, into the costs of plastic products.
Interested stakeholders are invited to submit their views on:
whether the legislation in force needs to be adapted and, if so, how, in order to manage plastic waste and to encourage its reuse, its recycling and its recovery over landfilling; the need to lay down specific plastic waste recycling targets and to take measures to avoid substandard recycling or the dumping of recyclable plastic waste exported to third countries; the effectiveness of voluntary action, in particular by producers and retailers, so as to achieve better resource use in the life cycle of plastic products; the possibility of introducing deposit and return or lease systems for specific categories of plastic products; the type of information to provide to consumers at the point of purchase of plastic products; changes to the chemical design of plastics to improve their recyclability; whether product design policy should tackle planned obsolescence of plastic products and aim at enhancing reuse and modular design in order to minimise plastic waste; the introduction of market-based instruments in order to more accurately reflect environmental costs from plastic production to final disposal; the opportunity to promote biodegradable plastics and to encourage the use of bioplastics; actions to be taken to reduce the volume of marine litter; the promotion, by the EU, of an international action to improve plastic waste management worldwide.
Contributions should reach the Commission not later than 7 June 2013. The follow-up to the Green Paper will be an integral part of the wide-ranging review of the existing waste legislation, which will be completed in 2014.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0016/2014
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0453/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE524.604
- Committee opinion: PE514.576
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE521.520
- Contribution: COM(2013)0123
- Committee draft report: PE516.911
- Contribution: COM(2013)0123
- Contribution: COM(2013)0123
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2013)0123
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE516.911
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE521.520
- Committee opinion: PE514.576
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE524.604
- Contribution: COM(2013)0123
- Contribution: COM(2013)0123
- Contribution: COM(2013)0123
Activities
- Vittorio PRODI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
32 |
2013/2113(INI)
2013/07/18
EMPL
32 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A (a) (new) Aa. whereas the plastics industry in the EU employs about 1.6 million people;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the transition to a low- carbon economy must enable the environmental and economic issues to be reconciled; recalls in this context that the Member States should support initiatives that facilitate the development of sectors with high employment potential and, in particular, that aid in the transformation towards a sustainable economy and the creation of green jobs;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Member States should support initiatives that facilitate the development of sectors with high employment potential and, in particular, that aid in the transformation towards a sustainable economy and the creation of green jobs which are permanent, not precarious and are of a high social standard;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Member States should support initiatives that facilitate the development of sectors with high employment potential and, in particular, that aid in the transformation towards a sustainable economy and the creation of quality green jobs;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Member States should support initiatives that facilitate the development of sectors with high employment potential and, in particular, that aid in the transformation towards a sustainable economy and the creation of green jobs; calls on local and regional authorities to coordinate public service provisions with environmental targets and objectives in order to achieve multiple objectives and stimulate green jobs in the process;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact th
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact the targets set within the Framework Directive on Waste, the Packaging Directive and WEEE Directive create opportunities for new employment in various sectors of the economy via a spill-over effect, and conducive environments for relevant industries should therefore be fostered in order that they may exploit their full job-creation potential; stresses that this offers young people in particular the opportunity to engage in new fields of activity and thus become integrated into the job market;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the potential of the circular economy model which, as it enables the decoupling of growth from the depletion of resources, is regenerative and may have an impact on all sectors, becoming a source of job creation; stresses that the circular economy presupposes a complete change in our idea of ‘products’ and that new jobs will be needed at each stage of the life-cycles of products, from eco-design through repair and repackaging to recycling;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that the strict rules on recycling electrical goods in Europe often result in a large proportion of electrical waste being recycled in West Africa in circumstances which are highly detrimental to humans and the natural world; calls for stricter monitoring in the EU in order to prevent this practice in the future;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that improved implementation of EU legislation on waste will contribute to economic development, and thus to job creation; stresses that recycling – a labour- intensive sector – can be an important source of jobs
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that improved implementation of EU legislation on waste
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A (b) (new) Ab. whereas the plastic recycling sector could create some 162,000 jobs in the EU in order to meet the new EU targets;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that improved implementation of EU legislation on waste will contribute to economic development, and thus to job creation; stresses that recycling
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines, however, that the employment potential of the recycling sector should not undermine efforts to reduce the resource intensity and dependency in the first place - a challenge which offers new employment opportunities as well;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the innovations currently taking place in plastics production (not least in the field of nanotechnology) and
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the innovations currently taking place in plastics production (not least in the field of nanotechnology) and their impact on the management of plastic waste raise new challenges to health and safety at work, and calls on the Commission to consider these challenges in future action on plastic waste and make the most stringent European employment and health protection standards binding on all the individuals, employees, service providers and self-employed people involved;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that changes in environmental legislation in countries such as China and Malaysia concerning the import of unwashed, post-consumer plastic could provide an important impetus for greater investment in recovery and recycling within the EU and the creation of additional employment;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the fact that appropriate levels of training and skills are needed for eco-innovations to flourish, and for EU waste legislation to be implemented correctly; recalls, in this context, that the European Social Fund could also be helpful in
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the fact that appropriate levels of training and skills are needed for eco-innovations to flourish, and for EU waste legislation to be implemented correctly; recalls, in this context, that the European Social Fund
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the fact that appropriate levels of training and skills are needed for eco-innovations to flourish
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital B (a) (new) Ba. whereas Europe 2020 strategy calls for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the fact that appropriate levels of training and skills are needed for eco-innovations to flourish, and for EU waste legislation to be implemented correctly; recalls, in this context, that the European Social Fund could be helpful in preparing the labour force for an increased demand for
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the fact that appropriate levels of training and skills are needed for eco-innovations to flourish, and for EU waste legislation to be implemented correctly; recalls, in this context, that the European Social Fund could be helpful in preparing the labour force for an increased demand for green jobs by promoting vocational training and work based learning.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the fact that appropriate levels of training and skills are needed for eco-innovations to flourish, and for EU waste legislation to be implemented correctly; recalls, in this context, that the European Social Fund could be helpful in preparing the labour force for an increased demand for green jobs
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that new environment policy, eco-innovation, waste management and bioeconomy initiatives at EU level should be preceded by solid impact assessments focusing on
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that new environment policy initiatives at EU level should be preceded by solid impact assessments focusing on employment and labour market opportunities as well as social consequences;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that new environment policy initiatives at EU level should be preceded by solid impact assessments focusing on employment and labour market opportunities and changes;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Member States should support initiatives that facilitate the development of sectors with high employment potential and, in particular, that aid in the transformation towards a sustainable economy and the creation of
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Member States should support initiatives that facilitate the development of sectors with high employment potential and, in particular, that aid in the transformation towards a sustainable economy and the creation of
source: PE-516.657
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0123/COM_COM(2013)0123_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0123/COM_COM(2013)0123_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0453&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0453_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0016New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0016_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/12250New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0123:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0123/COM_COM(2013)0123_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0123/COM_COM(2013)0123_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0123:EN
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-01-14T00:00:00New
2013-06-13T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-09-09T00:00:00New
2013-11-28T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-11-28T00:00:00New
2014-01-14T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1863c0fb8127435bdc019New
4f1ad227b819f2759500000b |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187a40fb8127435bdc21cNew
4f1ada92b819f207b300007b |
committees/2/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/2/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de182e70fb8127435bdbb4fNew
4f1ac5f2b819f25efd00000f |
committees/2/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1878d0fb8127435bdc1f9New
4f1ada3ab819f207b300005d |
committees/2/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de182d90fb8127435bdbb3fNew
4f1ac612b819f25efd00001a |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/6 |
Old
6.40.13 Relations with international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRDNew
6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52013PC0123:ENNew
CELEX:52013DC0123:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52013DC0123:ENNew
CELEX:52013PC0123:EN |
activities/7/date |
Old
2014-01-13T00:00:00New
2014-01-14T00:00:00 |
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0123:EN
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0123:EN
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.604
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-10-10T00:00:00New
2013-09-09T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/title |
Old
PE521.520New
PE516.911 |
activities/2/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.520New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.911 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-11-26T00:00:00New
2013-10-10T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
PE524.604New
PE521.520 |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.520
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-12-10T00:00:00New
2014-01-13T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.520
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|