Procedure completed
Next event: Council Meeting 2013/09/26 more...
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/09/25
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2013/10/30
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2013/10/24
- Debate in Parliament 2013/11/20
- Text adopted by Parliament, single reading 2013/11/21
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | ITRE | AUDY Jean-Pierre (EPP) | |
Opinion | IMCO | GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó (EPP) | |
Lead | AFET | GAHLER Michael (EPP) | ZEMKE Janusz Władysław (S&D), NICOLAI Norica (ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (Verts/ALE) |
Legal Basis RoP 048
Activites
-
2013/11/21
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
- T7-0514/2013
- 2013/11/20 Debate in Parliament
-
2013/10/30
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
A7-0358/2013
summary
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by Michael GAHLER (EPP, DE) on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’. The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, in exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Article 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report. Members recalled that an operational Common Security and Defence Policy needs a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). They welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area. While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back. Concerned about the reductions in defence investment, the report urged the Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies. Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand: the report called on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality. Member States are invited to further explore the possibility of synchronising and jointly planning the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA). Industrial policy: according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services. It should also promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes. The report stated that it is time to promote a voluntary approach in acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market, furthering its consolidation (and initiating harmonisation) as regards supply and demand, rules and standards. Member States are invited to: develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies, and provide them with effective corporate governance mechanisms within the European Union; encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities; minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles, to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation; develop ways and means of consolidating small and medium-sized enterprises in a sustainable manner and of facilitating their access to defence procurement. Common approach to standardisation and certification: Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes. Member States are encouraged to: explore the possibilities offered by the European Defence Agency (EDA) in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications, for example for the construction of hospital ships or in the field of remote-controlled aerial systems; streamline European certification procedures, with the mutual recognition of certificates and the development of common civilian and military European certification procedures. Ensuring security of supply: Member States, the EDA and the Commission are invited to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime, and to submit a joint non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics. Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation: the report recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), fostering the development of high technologies and helping sustain key competencies within Europe. It encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes. The European Council is urged, against the background of the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR). The report also highlighted the need: to support CSDP missions through European research and development: Members emphasised the importance of research and innovation in the security and defence sector and of the Horizon 2020 research programme and invited the Member States to establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere, with a focus on cutting-edge technological applications; to maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union; for greater cooperation and exchange of know-how among Member States, on the one hand, and between the European Union and its key partners, on the other; for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology; to develop European ICT and cyber-security standards and integrating them with international standards. Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment: Members recalled that Member States urgently need to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets, while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. The Commission is urged to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.
-
A7-0358/2013
summary
-
2013/10/24
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #3258
- 2013/09/26 Council Meeting
- 2013/09/25 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2013/08/28 Committee draft report
-
2013/07/24
Non-legislative basic document
-
COM(2013)0542
summary
PURPOSE: to set out an Action Plan for the Commission’s contribution to strengthening the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). BACKGROUND: the security challenges the EU is facing are numerous, complex, interrelated and difficult to foresee. The strategic and geopolitical environment is rapidly and constantly evolving. The world’s balance of power is shifting as new centres of gravity are emerging and the US is rebalancing its strategic focus towards Asia. The crisis in public spending induces cuts in defence budgets. From 2001 to 2010 EU defence spending declined from €251 billion to €194 billion. These budget cuts are also having a serious impact on the industries that develop equipment for our armed forces. They affect in particular the investment in defence R&D that is crucial for developing capabilities of the future. The problem of shrinking defence budgets is aggravated by the persisting fragmentation of European markets which leads to unnecessary duplication of capabilities, organisations and expenditures. This situation necessitates a reorientation of priorities. Defence industry in Europe directly employs about 400 000 people and generates up to another 960 000 indirect jobs. It is, therefore, a sector that is essential to retain if Europe is to remain a world-leading centre for manufacturing and innovation. The European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) constitutes a key element for Europe's capacity to ensure the security of its citizens and to protect its values and interests. Europe must be able to assume its responsibilities for its own security and for international peace and stability in general. This necessitates a certain degree of strategic autonomy: to be a credible and reliable partner, Europe must be able to decide and to act without depending on the capabilities of third parties. Security of supply, access to critical technologies and operational sovereignty are therefore crucial. Defence is still at the heart of national sovereignty and decisions on military capabilities remain with Member States. However, the EU does have a significant contribution to make. With Members States having amongst themselves around 1.6 million soldiers and annual defence budgets of €194 billion the EU has the capacity to be a strategic actor on the international stage, in line with its values. The European Council, in its Conclusions of 14 December 2012, called upon the High Representative, notably through the European External Action Service and the European Defence Agency, as well as the Commission, to develop further proposals and actions to strengthen CSDP and improve the availability of the required civilian and military capabilities. CONTENT: this Communication builds on the work of the Commission's Defence Task Force established in 2011 with the objective to strengthen the defence sector by mobilising all relevant EU policies. The European External Action Service (EEAS) and European Defence Agency (EDA) have been fully associated to the work of the Task Force and in the preparation of this Communication. This Communication presents a package of measures aiming to encourage the cooperation between Member States. It aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation which come from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military. To reach these objectives, the Commission sets out an Action Plan to strengthen the CSDP in the following areas: Strengthen the internal market for defence and security: the Commission has put forward the two Directives on defence and sensitive security procurement (2009/81/EC) and transfers (2009/43/EC), which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market. The Commission shall also tackle persisting unfair and discriminatory practices and market distortions as well as develop instruments which enable Member States to improve the security of supply between them. Strengthen the competitiveness of the EDTIB: to this end, the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on the following strands: support for competitiveness – including developing 'hybrid standards' to benefit security and defence markets and examining the ways to develop a European certification system for military airworthiness, building on the civil experience of EASA gained by certifying the Airbus A-400M (in its civil configuration); screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector within the context of the EU’s overall raw materials strategy and prepare, if necessary, targeted policy actions; support for SMEs – including development of a European Strategic Cluster Partnership to provide links with other clusters and support defence-related SMEs in global competition; promote skills identified as essential to the future of the industry including through the "Sector Skills Alliances" and "Knowledge Alliances" programmes currently being trialled. In this context, Member States can use the support that can be provided by the European Social Fund (ESF) and in certain cases of mass redundancies also by the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation and reducing the energy footprint: this concerns exploiting civilian military synergies to the maximum extent possible in order to ensure the most efficient use of European tax payers' resources, in particular by: concentrating its efforts on possible cross-fertilisation between civil and military research and the dual-use potential of space; assessing the possibility of EU-owned dual-use capabilities, which may in certain security areas complement national capabilities and become effective and cost-efficient force multipliers; considering launching a preparatory action for CSDP-related research focusing on those areas where EU defence capabilities are most needed; helping armed forces reduce their energy consumption and thereby contribute to the Union’s 20/20/20 targets. The Commission invites the European Council to discuss this Action Plan in December 2013. On the basis of the discussions with Heads of State and Government, the Commission will develop for the areas defined in this Communication a detailed roadmap with concrete actions and timelines.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/', 'title': 'Enterprise and Industry'}, TAJANI Antonio
-
COM(2013)0542
summary
-
2013/07/04
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
- Committee draft report: PE516.829
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2013)0542
- Debate in Council: 3258
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.909
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0358/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0514/2013
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-11-21T00:00:00New
2013-08-28T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00New
2013-09-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
PE516.829New
PE516.909 |
activities/3/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/7/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=EN
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-11-18T00:00:00New
2013-08-28T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00New
2013-09-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
PE516.829New
PE516.909 |
activities/3/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/5 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-10-24T00:00:00New
2013-11-20T00:00:00 |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/8 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-10-17T00:00:00New
2013-10-24T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-07-17T00:00:00New
2013-10-17T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/1 |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|