Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | FERREIRA Elisa ( S&D) | DE BACKER Philippe ( ALDE), EPPINK Derk Jan ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | CORNELISSEN Marije ( Verts/ALE) | Barbara MATERA ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica ( PPE) | Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO ( S&D), Marian HARKIN ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | TRAUTMANN Catherine ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | DEUTSCH Tamás ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | SCHWAB Andreas ( PPE) | Dennis de JONG ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 96, with 25 abstentions, a resolution on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2013 priorities.
Whilst welcoming the country-specific recommendations made by the Commission, Members felt that the former need to be more precisely defined and improved for some Member States.
They considered that urgent action is required in many areas , inter alia in:
restoring lending to the real economy and SMEs, which involves developing alternative resources of financing, making the business environment more competitive, fighting tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning, restoring the sustainability of public finances and seeking effective European solutions to unemployment and thus establishing a fully integrated labour market and also significantly enhancing the social dimension of EMU.
Parliament welcomed the achievements made in several Member States which allowed their deficit procedures to be closed. It also welcomes the Commission’s statement that ‘ deficit ’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘ surplus ’ countries need to boost, where possible, their demand in a proportionate and sustainable way in order to contribute to the stability and growth of the eurozone.
Members welcomed the Commission’s statement that already in this year’s budgetary execution assessment and in the analysis of the national budgets for 2014, the Commission will try to accommodate, under certain conditions, non-recurrent, public investment programmes with a proven impact on the sustainability of public finances, while fully respecting the EU fiscal surveillance framework.
Members believed that the EU economy as a whole needs to boost its competitiveness in the global economy . They stressed that the EU cannot compete on costs alone, but needs to invest more in research and development, education and skills, and resource efficiency.
The Commission is asked to:
submit as a matter of urgency legislative proposals with the aim of creating a genuine convergence process within the EU Semester, based on Europe 2020 objectives, such as a Competitiveness and Convergence Instrument (CCI), as well as provisions on ex-ante economic policy coordination; develop a genuine European industrial policy , based on enhanced competitiveness and innovation that focuses on restoring European industrial competitiveness and scaling back policies which cause companies to relocate outside the EU; submit legislative proposals to complete the EMU, which should include a social pillar and set up a social pact for Europe , as recommended by Parliament in its resolution of 20 November 2012.
Parliament called for closer monitoring of the application of the new prudential rules and the banking sector practices in financing the real economy, in particular economically viable SMEs. It called for direct banking recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to be available as soon as the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) is in place.
Employment and social policies : Parliament called for increased targeting of EU funding on all priorities under the Europe 2020 strategy , in particular through growth and employment policies, including combating youth unemployment and long-term unemployment, and creating lasting jobs which are not precarious, entail the compulsory payment of social security contributions and are adequately remunerated. In this regard, it should be ensured that the necessary flexibility that is needed on the labour market is balanced with adequate levels of social protection .
Members want to see a European Pact for Youth Employment and encouraged the Commission to continue the work of the Youth Employment Action Teams to help the Member States with the highest levels of youth unemployment to re-programme EU structural funding under the 2007-2013 MFF in order to target it at young people . They welcomed the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for the Youth Employment Initiative under the next MFF.
Parliament called for:
specific action to increase the labour participation of women, older workers and workers with disabilities by ensuring that there are efficient incentives to return to, and stay in, work; support for the long-term unemployed through positive activation incentives such as personalised guidance and welfare-to-work programmes; labour market reforms with adequate levels of social protection which aim to reduce in-work poverty and strengthen the rights of workers with atypical contracts and improving social protection for self-employed workers.
The resolution recalled the skills mismatches and bottlenecks in many regions and sectors and the inability of certain education and training systems to cope with market demands and workers’ needs in this context.
Internal market : the Commission is asked to make single market governance a priority in its next Annual Growth Survey and in the European Semester 2014, and, in the next country-specific recommendations, to take full account of the key growth areas – identified as the services sector, the energy sector, the transport sector and the digital single market.
Members call for full and appropriate implementation of the EU Services Directive whilst safeguarding public service obligations.
The Commission is asked, in the meantime, to step up its efforts to enforce single market legislation and to monitor this enforcement.
Regional policies : deeply concerned by the sharp downturn in public and private investment in the productive economy and especially at local and regional level, Members are convinced that that the Structural and Investment Funds are essential in order to boost public investment. Member States are urged to do their utmost to decide in a timely manner on their national programming for the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund , in order to avoid delays in using these funds, whose aim is to support growth and job creation.
Women’s rights and gender equality : Parliament welcomed the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) regarding measures to improve childcare facilities, to remove disincentives for second earners and to accommodate the need to combine work and private life.
It stresses the importance of gender budgeting with a view to examining all government programmes and policies, their effects on resource allocation, and their contribution to equality between women and men.
Democratic legitimacy and the European semester : Members stress the need for dedicated respect for parliamentary prerogatives at European and national level and for those of the Commission as laid down in the Treaties and EU law against the trend of an increasingly intergovernmental culture of economic-policy making at EU and euro-area level. They urge the Commission to ensure the proper formal involvement of the European Parliament in all the steps of the European Semester process in order to increase the legitimacy of decisions which affect all citizens; calls on the Commission to find ways to increase the visibility of the process.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report Elisa FERREIRA (S&D, PT) on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2013 priorities.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, exercising its powers as an associated committee under Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure , was also consulted and gave its opinion on the report.
Whilst welcoming the country-specific recommendations made by the Commission, Members feel that the former need to be more precisely defined and improved for some Member States.
They consider that urgent action is required in many areas , inter alia in:
· restoring lending to the real economy and SMEs, which involves developing alternative resources of financing,
· making the business environment more competitive,
· fighting tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning,
· restoring the sustainability of public finances and
· seeking effective European solutions to unemployment and thus establishing a fully integrated labour market and also significantly enhancing the social dimension of EMU.
The report welcomes the Commission’s statement that ‘ deficit ’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘ surplus ’ countries need to boost, where possible, their demand in a proportionate and sustainable way in order to contribute to the stability and growth of the eurozone.
The committee believes that the EU economy as a whole needs to boost its competitiveness in the global economy . It stresses that the EU cannot compete on costs alone, but needs to invest more in research and development, education and skills, and resource efficiency.
The Commission is asked to:
· submit as a matter of urgency legislative proposals with the aim of creating a genuine convergence process within the EU Semester, based on Europe 2020 objectives, such as a Competitiveness and Convergence Instrument (CCI), as well as provisions on ex-ante economic policy coordination;
· develop a genuine European industrial policy , based on enhanced competitiveness and innovation,
· submit legislative proposals to complete the EMU, which should include a social pillar and set up a social pact for Europe , as recommended by Parliament in its resolution of 20 November 2012.
Members regret delays in implementing the EUR 120 billion ‘Compact for Growth and Jobs’ agreed in June 2012, the Project Bond initiative launched in November 2012 and the EUR 180 billion additional investment by the EIB. They call on the Council and the Commission to investigate and quickly remove the obstacles preventing full delivery of these initiatives.
Employment and social policies : Members consider the Commission’s recognition of the need to reduce taxes on employment in favour of other sources of income to be a positive development, which will speed up the fiscal consolidation process on a fairer basis.
The report makes the following observations:
· there must be increased targeting of EU funding on all priorities under the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular through growth and employment policies, including combating youth unemployment and long-term unemployment, and creating lasting jobs which are not precarious, and are adequately remunerated;
· the necessary flexibility that exists on the labour market must not adversely affect the high levels of social protection ;
· labour market reforms must aim at promoting quality in work, improving social risk management, achieving progress in the inclusion of vulnerable groups in the labour market, reducing in-work poverty, reconciling work and family life, promoting gender equality, promoting health and safety at work, strengthening the rights of workers with atypical contracts and improving social protection for self-employed workers.
Members want to see a European Pact for Youth Employment and encourage the Commission to continue the work of the Youth Employment Action Teams to help the Member States with the highest levels of youth unemployment to re-programme EU structural funding under the 2007-2013 MFF in order to target it at young people .
Internal market : the Commission is asked to make single market governance a priority in its next Annual Growth Survey and in the European Semester 2014, and, in the next country-specific recommendations, to take full account of the key growth areas – identified as the services sector, the energy sector, the transport sector and the digital single market.
Members call for full and appropriate implementation of the EU Services Directive whilst safeguarding public service obligations.
The Commission is asked, in the meantime, to step up its efforts to enforce single market legislation and to monitor this enforcement.
Regional policies : deeply concerned by the sharp downturn in public and private investment in the productive economy and especially at local and regional level, Members are convinced that that the Structural and Investment Funds are essential in order to boost public investment. Member States are urged to do their utmost to decide in a timely manner on their national programming for the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund , in order to avoid delays in using these funds, whose aim is to support growth and job creation.
Women’s rights and gender equality : the report stresses that new technology affords both employers and employees new opportunities for organising work in such a way as to strike a better work-life balance and thus make the labour market more inclusive for women.
The Commission and Member States are asked to bear in mind the objective of gender equality in the national work programmes.
Democratic legitimacy and the European semester : Members stress the need for dedicated respect for parliamentary prerogatives at European and national level and for those of the Commission as laid down in the Treaties and EU law against the trend of an increasingly intergovernmental culture of economic-policy making at EU and euro-area level.
In the framework of the European Semester , the Council issued:
recommendations to 23 Member States on the economic and employment policies set out in their national reform programmes, and opinions on their fiscal policies, as presented in their stability/convergence programmes; a specific recommendation on the economic policies of the Member States of the euro area .
Adoption of the texts, generally endorsed by the European Council on 27 and 28 June, concludes the 2012 European Semester monitoring exercise.
In accordance with the "comply or explain" principle introduced in 2011 in the "six-pack" reform of policy monitoring, the Council issued explanations in cases where its country-specific recommendations do not comply with those proposed by the Commission (see doc 11336/13 ).
In setting out the priorities for this year's European Semester, the European Council emphasised the need to accelerate efforts to support growth as a matter of priority whilst pursuing growth-friendly fiscal consolidation .
Within the period 2013-2014, the Member States of the eurozone are invited to :
take responsibility for the aggregate policy stance in the euro area in order to ensure the good functioning of the euro area to increase growth and employment, and to take forward the work on deepening Economic and Monetary Union; ensure that the Eurogroup monitors and coordinates fiscal policies of the euro area Member States and the aggregate fiscal stance for the euro area as a whole to ensure a growth friendly and differentiated fiscal policy; building on the recapitalisation and the restructuring of the past years, promote further balance-sheet repair among banks as a means to reverse fragmentation in the single market and improve the flow of credit to the real economy, particularly SMEs; coordinate ex ante the major economic reform plans of the Member States whose currency is the euro; promote further adjustment in the euro area, ensuring a correction of external and internal imbalances; take the necessary steps for an effective implementation of the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure.
In line with the Annual Growth Survey 2013, it is crucial for the euro area Member States to take collective and significant measures in order to tackle the social consequences of the crisis and the rising unemployment levels .
The Council recommends:
that bold action should be taken along the lines of the Compact for Growth and jobs and the EU Youth Guarantee to tackle youth unemployment; further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market, reduce the cost of labour, combat labour market segmentation and support innovation are recommended.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)62
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0447/2013
- Debate in Council: 3268
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0322/2013
- Committee opinion: PE514.705
- Committee opinion: PE516.662
- Committee opinion: PE514.623
- Committee opinion: PE514.719
- Committee opinion: PE514.761
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.691
- Committee draft report: PE514.640
- Committee draft report: PE514.640
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.691
- Committee opinion: PE514.761
- Committee opinion: PE514.623
- Committee opinion: PE514.719
- Committee opinion: PE516.662
- Committee opinion: PE514.705
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)62
Activities
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana BRZOBOHATÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michael CASHMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marije CORNELISSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe DE BACKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisa FERREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Paul GAUZÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GOULARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mojca KLEVA KEKUŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alfredo PALLONE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marianne THYSSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine TRAUTMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Corien WORTMANN-KOOL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 17/1 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 17/2 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 18 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 35 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 61 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 66/1 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 66/2 #
A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira - § 66/3 #
Amendments | Dossier |
375 |
2013/2134(INI)
2013/07/11
IMCO
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the improvement of the economic governance framework should be based on a set of interconnected and mutually consistent policies that foster growth and employment and that the full development of the internal market is a prerequisite for this to happen;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes the lack of involvement of national parliaments in the debate on Single Market aspects in the European Semester 2013 and calls on them to actively engage in a dialogue with the European Parliament and their respective governments to better activate untapped growth and employment potential; stresses that the engagement of the stakeholders in the development of the necessary reforms is crucial to their delivery and success.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes the lack of involvement of national parliaments in the debate on Single Market aspects in the European Semester 2013 and calls on them to actively engage in a dialogue with the European Parliament and their respective governments to carry out their better regulation commitments, such as conducting a Single Market test, and to better activate untapped growth and employment potential.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines the importance of a stronger and earlier involvement of the social partners and all stakeholders in designing, adopting, implementing and monitoring the measures needed to boost growth and citizens' rights in the Single Market.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that a full and proper implementation of the Services Directive could trigger growth potential of between 0.8 % and 2.6 % of GDP and that completion of the digital single market could generate economic benefits equivalent to EUR 4,200 per household;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that, in the context of the European Semester, the Single Market should be considered integrated to other horizontal policy areas, such as consumer and worker protection, social rights, the environment and sustainable development;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets, however, that despite the strong evidence on the importance of the Single Market in overcoming the crisis, the 2013 country-specific recommendations do not address the growth, consumer confidence and jobs potential of the
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the importance given by this year's country-specific recommendations to the removal of unjustified restrictions and barriers to entry in the services sectors; urges the Member States concerned to
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets that the lack of national and European investment will not allow the achievement of the priorities indicated in the report on the «State of the Single Market Integration 2013 - Contribution to the Annual Growth Survey 2013» in the key areas of energy, transport and digital market;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets that there are still many problems in the Internal Market with regard to respecting social rights, in particular equal pay for equal work, and underscores the importance of resolving these problems;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Reiterates its call on the Commission to strengthen Single Market governance by establishing an annual Single Market governance cycle as a specific pillar of the European Semester, including the Internal Market Scoreboard, an annual report on the integration of the Sin
source: PE-514.833
2013/07/16
REGI
21 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the 2013 Country-specific Recommendations (CSR) and especially their focus on
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes with concern that the financing of the productive economy, especially SMEs, has not been restored across the whole EU, with the less developed regions taking the worst hit; points out that increasing differences in access to credit can further deepen regional divergences; hence underlines the importance of the European Structural and Investment Funds ability to link public and private investment and deliver alternative sources of financing for SMEs; calls on the Commission to guarantee, in a timely manner and before the start of the programming period 2014-2020, legal clarity and transparency around the usage of the off-the-shelf innovative financial instruments;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Believes that whereas financial protection measures enacted by the ECB have contributed to the stability of the euro area and calmed financial markets, the competitiveness problem in the euro area has been left unresolved;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the labour market reforms which were aimed at improving the resilience of the labour market, introducing more internal and external flexibility, reducing fragmentation and facilitating transition between jobs; recalls however that further and more in-depth reforms are needed, notably to improve labour market mobility and especially youth mobility with a special focus on improving
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the labour market reforms which were aimed at improving the resilience of the labour market, introducing more internal and external flexibility, reducing fragmentation and facilitating transition between jobs; Recalls however that further and more in-depth reforms are needed, notably to improve labour market mobility and especially youth mobility
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the labour market reforms which were aimed at improving the resilience of the labour market, introducing more internal and external flexibility, reducing fragmentation and facilitating transition between jobs; Recalls however that further and more in-depth reforms are needed, notably to improve labour market mobility and especially youth mobility with a special focus on improving the professional opportunities of young people, in particular of those who face difficulties when entering the job market, to provide job-search assistance and to establish clear and transparent links between education and training in order to achieve a better match between skills and available jobs; acknowledges that dual training is eminently suited to the needs of the employment market and makes it easier for young people to find their first job;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Highlights the need to prioritise all available measures to tackle the crisis of youth unemployment;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that, now more than ever, structural reforms at regional, national and EU level are necessary to create employment opportunities targeted at the young workforce; stresses that these efforts should focus in particular on aligning EU employment strategies and the future requirements of the European economy;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the need to continue with programmes designed to encourage entrepreneurship among young people through the creation of special business start-up opportunities for them, accompanied by increased access to European funding and business advice;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers it necessary to take urgent measures to make the EU more competitive at international level and generate sustainable internal growth; stresses that efforts must be focused on the creation of innovatory schemes involving cheaper and more accessible credit for SMEs and improving the business climate by promoting new sources of capital, including business-to- business lending, and facilitating access to venture capital;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the diminishing number of Member States under the excessive deficit procedure and the fact that Member States are reducing their debts and consolidating their budgets; Strongly urges the Commission and the Member States to exploit all margins of flexibility inherent in the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to balance productive public investment needs with fiscal discipline objectives, for example by excluding the aggregate volumes of national co-financing under the Structural and Investment Funds from the limits imposed by the Stability and Growth Pact, or by basing calculations for the purposes of the Pact on a Member State’s net cash requirements, as opposed to its gross requirements.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reiterates the position of the European Parliament on the need to strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the process of the European Semester; stresses the fact that National Parliaments, and regional and local authorities, have very limited access to the process of the European Semester and their role is practically ignored within the CSR, despite the fact that their contribution and participation are necessary if the chances of meeting the Europe 2020 targets are to be improved;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls the European Parliament's position against the proposed macroeconomic conditionality in the framework of the MFF negotiations to the European Union Structural and Investment Funds as this would, without any relation between policy performance at regional and Member State level, punish regions for possible failure of compliance with economic governance procedures at national level;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission to complete the EMU by delivering legislative proposals linked to the social pillar; stresses that a social scoreboard that would serve as a building block of this pillar needs to include also relevant regional and local specificities;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the importance of Cohesion Policy as the main investment instrument, at European level, playing a central role in combating the crisis and engaging the EU and its regions on a path of sustainable growth; Hence underlines the importance of securing adequate budgetary provisions and macroeconomic conditionality in the context of the MFF negotiations to the European Union Structural and Investment Funds, noting in particular their key share of investment in a range of areas such as employment, innovation, sustainable development and support to SMEs;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the importance of Cohesion Policy as the main investment instrument, playing a central role in combating the crisis, reducing regional disparities and engaging the EU and its regions
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is strongly concerned by the sharp downfall in public and private investment in the productive economy and especially at the local and regional level; Is of the opinion that decisive measures are needed to reform product and labour markets, adopt cautious wage policies and base the future growth model on innovation, a
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is strongly concerned by the sharp downfall in public and private investment in the productive economy and especially at the local and regional level; Is of the opinion that decisive measures are needed to reform product and labour markets, adopt cautious wage policies and base the future growth model on innovation and shift production towards high value-added activities; Expresses its firm belief that the Structural and Investment Funds are essential in order to prevent and mitigate any shortfall in the aforementioned respects
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is strongly concerned by the sharp downfall in public and private investment in the productive economy and especially at the local and regional level; Is of the
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that, at a time of heavy fiscal constraint and reduced lending capacity in the private sector, the EU Structural and Investment Funds, represent an essential lever for stimulating the economy, especially through the use of innovative financial instruments; believes that an increased use of innovative financial instruments within Cohesion Policy can foster public- private partnerships, achieve a multiplier effect with the EU budget, guarantee an important financing stream for strategic regional investment and raise EU growth potential; in this regard, welcomes the important role that the new innovative financial instruments will play within Cohesion policy in the programming period 2014-2020; urges the Commission to give financial instruments also a clearer position within the CSR and strengthen the alignment of the European Structural and Investment Funds with the EIB programmes, particularly in the area of loan guarantees for SMEs and microenterprises;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is concerned at the continued massive deindustrialisation of certain regions in Europe, leading to excessive unemployment and numerous demographic problems;
source: PE-516.682
2013/07/17
ECON
235 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 110-113,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have not yet abated and
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to submit as a matter of urgency the legislative proposal on new financial incentives supporting Member States in the implementation of structural reforms, including a Competitiveness and Convergence Instrument (CCI) based on the Community method
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to submit as a matter of urgency
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to submit as a matter of urgency the legislative proposal on new financial incentives supporting Member States in the implementation of
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls its position that CCIs should be funded by means of a new facility triggered and governed under the Community method as an integral part of the EU budget, but over and above the MFF ceilings; agrees with the Commission that CCIs are the first building blocks of a genuine fiscal capacity supporting solidarity, cohesion and the implementation of sustainable growth enhancing structural reforms;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Is concerned by the EU summit conclusions of June 28 in which the European Council announces that it will decide on the main features of 'contractual arrangements' as well as look a the indicators to be taken into account in the framework of enhanced economic policy coordination and social dimension of the EMU; emphasizes that the European Council does not have any Treaty based prerogative for legislative initiative;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to include in the scope of a CCI financial support to structural reforms in areas that block economic dynamism and efficiency
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have not yet abated and the objective of a more
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to include in the scope of a CCI financial support to structural reforms in areas that block economic dynamism and efficiency such as the reforms of the national justice systems, technically supported by the EU Justice Scoreboard; stresses that the subsidiarity principle must be complied with here;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the margin of manoeuvre offered by the revised SGP to extend the deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits in seven procedures; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the content and the calendar of the fiscal adjustment path are adapted to the specificity of each country and, particularly in ‘deficit’ countries, include the aforementioned margin of manoeuvre and the full use of structural funds, sound and sustainable structural reforms and the identification of investments (namely in the CSR) essential to boost competitiveness;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the margin of manoeuvre offered by the revised SGP to extend the deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits in seven procedures; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the content and the calendar of the fiscal adjustment path are adapted to the specificity of each country and, particularly in ‘deficit’ countries, include the aforementioned margin of manoeuvre and the full use of structural funds, sound and sustainable structural reforms and the identification of investments (namely in the CSR) essential to boost competitiveness;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the margin of manoeuvre offered by the revised SGP to extend the deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits in seven procedures; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the content and the calendar of the fiscal adjustment path are adapted to the specificity of each country and, particularly in ‘deficit’ countries,
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the margin of manoeuvre offered by the revised SGP to extend the deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits in seven procedures; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the content and the calendar of the fiscal adjustment path are adapted to the specificity of each country and, particularly in
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have not yet abated and the objective of a more
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the margin of manoeuvre offered by the revised SGP to extend the deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits in seven procedures; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the content and the calendar of the fiscal adjustment path are adapted to the specificity of each country
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the use by the Commission of the margin of manoeuvre offered by the revised SGP to extend the deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits in seven procedures; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the content and the calendar of the fiscal adjustment path are adapted to the specificity of each country and, particularly in ‘deficit’ countries, include the aforementioned margin of manoeuvre and the full use of
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Takes note of the communication on the harmonized framework for draft budgetary plans and debt issuance reports within the euro area adopted by the Commission as guidelines in the framework of Regulation (EU) No 473/2013; looks forward to the economic dialogue foreseen with the Commission on the content of these guidelines;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Welcomes the inclusion of reporting guidelines on indications on how measures in the draft budgetary plans address CSRs, the targets set in the EU2020 strategy, reporting guidelines on the expected distributional impact of the main expenditure and revenue measures as well as details on the general government expenditure by function; underlines that such guidelines will facilitate the monitoring of budgetary measures taken with a view of achieving EU2020 national targets;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Looks forward to the forthcoming disclosure agreed on the 'two pack' outcome of the Commission's and Member States' parameters and methodological benchmarks including fiscal multipliers estimators underlying their macroeconomic prospects;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the Commission’s statement that ‘surplus’ countries have a role to play in overcoming the current crisis
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the Commission's statement that ‘surplus’ countries have a role to play in overcoming the current crisis, not only by reducing taxes and social security contributions
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the Commission's statement that ‘surplus’ countries have a role to play in overcoming the current crisis
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas a rebalancing of the EU economy can be observed, but public finances and growth prospects remain a matter of concern;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the Commission's statement that
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the Commission’s statement that ‘surplus’ countries have a role to play in overcoming the current crisis
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the Commission's statement that ‘surplus’ countries have a role to play in overcoming the current crisis, not only by reducing taxes and social security contributions but also by developing wages in order to boost sustainable domestic demand and promoting new investment opportunities; stresses the importance of the positive spill-over effects which these actions will have across the EU; calls on the Commission to adapt the scoreboard indicators of the macro-economic imbalances procedure accordingly;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to develop a
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to develop a genuine European industrial policy
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to develop a
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to develop a
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to develop a genuine European industrial policy based on enhanced competitiveness and innovation, and a coherent European external trade policy, based on reciprocity and shared minimum standards, in particular in social and environmental matters; believes that it is only by intelligently managing its interface with ‘globalisation’ that Europe can guarantee growth, jobs and, for several Member States, the recommended progressive reallocation of resources away from non- tradable sectors into tradable sectors;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to develop a genuine European industrial policy and a coherent European external trade policy, based on fre
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Commends the Commission’s recognition that there is a need for greater attention to be paid to the distributional impact of reforms
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Commends the Commission's recognition that there is a need for greater attention to be paid to the distributional impact of reforms
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Commends the Commission's
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to submit legislative proposals to complete the EMU
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to submit legislative proposals to complete the EMU
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges in that perspective the Commission to adopt without delay the committed communication on the EMU social dimension and in that perspective to update the scoreboard of macroeconomic imbalances with a set of social indicators together with the adoption of a standalone scoreboard related to the EMU social dimension;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB’s action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB’s action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action, which the Central Bank insists were not possible before decisions had been taken concerning fiscal adjustments and structural reforms at national level, has
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission's country- specific recommendations (CSRs) contain
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB’s action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt and supporting attempts at reform embarked upon in some Member States; considers, however, that insufficient growth and high (and still growing) levels of private and public debt in many Member States mean that ‘a carefully managed process of deleveraging’ is required;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt; considers, however, that insufficient growth and high (and still growing) levels of private and public debt in many Member States mean that
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt; considers, however, that insufficient growth and high (and still growing) levels of private and public debt in many Member States mean that ‘a carefully managed process of deleveraging’ is required; calls on the Commission, therefore, to quickly deliver
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt; considers, however, that insufficient growth and high (and still growing) levels of private and public debt in many Member States mean that ‘a carefully managed process of deleveraging’ is required;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt; considers, however, that insufficient growth and high (and still growing) levels of private and public debt in many Member States mean that ‘a carefully managed process of deleveraging’ is required; calls on the Commission, therefore, to quickly deliver its 2-pack commitments to Parliament in order to deepen the analysis on, and consider the pros and cons of the partial substitution of national debt issuance through joint issuance in the form of a redemption fund and eurobills;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Agrees that the ECB's action has ‘decisively contributed to the stability of the euro area’, limiting speculation on sovereign debt; considers, however, that insufficient growth and high (and still growing) levels of private and public debt in many Member States mean that ‘a carefully managed process of deleveraging’ is required; calls on the Commission, therefore, to quickly deliver its 2-pack commitments to Parliament in order to deepen the analysis on the partial substitution of national debt issuance through joint issuance based on conditionality in the form of a redemption fund and eurobills;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored on the EU's periphery; points out that major differences in access to credit further stimulate the growing internal divergence trends in the EU and euro area in particular
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission’s country- specific recommendations (CSRs) contain
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored on the EU's periphery; points out that major differences in access to credit further stimulate the growing internal divergence trends in the EU and euro area in particular and destroy the internal market through unfair competition conditions; points out also that negative economic prospects only partially justify such restrictive credit constraints; calls for closer monitoring of the banking sector practices in financing the real economy, in particular economically viable SMEs;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored on the EU’s periphery; points out that major differences in access to credit further stimulate the growing internal divergence trends in the EU and euro area in particular and destroy the internal market through unfair competition conditions; points out also that negative economic prospects only partially justify such restrictive credit constraints; calls for
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored on the EU's periphery; points out that major differences in access to
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that the financing of the real economy, and of SMEs in particular, has not been restored on the EU's periphery; points out that major differences in access to credit further stimulate the growing internal divergence trends in the EU and euro area in particular and d
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Points out that negative economic prospects only partially justify such restrictive credit constraints; calls for closer monitoring of the banking sector practices in financing the real economy, in particular economically viable SMEs; calls for the Commission to attach particular importance to the analysis of alternative sources of financing for SMEs, in particular through the Structural Funds, the European Investment Bank, the European Investment Fund and public development banks;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers it necessary to take urgent measures to make the EU more competitive at international level and generate sustainable internal growth; stresses that efforts must be focused on the creation of innovatory schemes involving cheaper and more accessible credit for SMEs and improving the business climate by promoting new sources of capital, including business-to-business lending, and facilitating access to venture capital;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Stresses that the retreat of various financial actors into national markets suggests that they are being weakened by the fragmentation of the internal market through excessive concentration, blocking the interbank market and negating the advantages of the internal market, i.e. risk diversification and greater opportunities;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Stresses the need to continue with programmes designed to encourage entrepreneurship among young people through the creation of special business start-up opportunities for them, accompanied by increased access to European funding and business advice;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission's country- specific recommendations (CSRs) contain
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission's country- specific recommendations (CSRs) contain
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for direct banking recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to be available
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for direct banking recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to be available as soon as all the pillars of the Banking Union – namely the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Deposit Guarantee and Recovery and Resolution frameworks – are in place;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for direct banking recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to be available as soon as all the pillars of the Banking Union – namely the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Deposit Guarantee and Recovery and Resolution frameworks – are in place; given the urgency of having a Single Resolution Fund to accompany the SSM, supports the immediate frontloading of the ESM to feed the SRF, with a reimbursement period by industry;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for direct banking recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to be available as soon as
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for direct banking recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to be available
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Asks the Commission to put forward a proposal taking stock of the ECJ 'Pringle' ruling on the ESM consistency with the EU legal framework so as to bring the ESM under the community acquis while providing for a comprehensive European Parliament democratic accountability;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 July 2011 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on investor-compensation schemes (COM(2010)0371 – C7-0174/2010 – 2010/0199(COD))- Schmidt report);
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission's country- specific recommendations (CSRs) contain some useful insights, but on the whole fail to convince in terms of the balance of the policy prescriptions across policy areas as well as in terms of methodology regarding the assessment of National Reform Programmes and the follow-up of country-specific Recommendations;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the Commission’s ‘Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion’ and its recommendations on ‘measures intended to encourage all EU countries and third countries to apply minimum standards of good governance in tax matters’
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the Commission's ‘Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion’ and its recommendations on ‘measures intended to encourage third countries to apply minimum standards of good governance in tax matters’ and on ‘aggressive tax planning’, adopted on 6 December 2012;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Council to conclude the negotiations for the Financial Transaction Tax
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Council to
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Council to conclude the negotiations for the Financial Transaction Tax and to
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission’s country- specific recommendations (CSRs) contain some useful insights, but on the whole
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Council to conclude the negotiations for the Financial Transaction Tax
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Council to conclude the negotiations for the Financial Transaction Tax and to include in its agenda, as a matter of urgency,
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. The introduction of the Financial Transaction Tax, to be pursued through enhanced cooperation, should be regarded as the first step towards its introduction worldwide;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls for the urgent application of the 2-pack, with, as an immediate consequence, the reshaping of the ad hoc system of ‘troikas’ into a legally sound structure under European law,
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls for the
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls for the urgent application of the 2-pack, with, as an immediate consequence, the reshaping of the ad hoc system of
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Welcomes the fact that, for the first time, the Single Market is more closely aligned to the European Semester by including a report on the State of Single Market Integration 2013 in the AGS package;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Reminds that the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, confirmed in his remarks to the European Parliament on 1 February 2012 that the ESM operation will be "subject to the scrutiny of the European Parliament"; looks forward in that perspective to the negotiation of an arrangement with the Eurogroup providing inter alia for the possibility to organise hearings and address written questions to the ESM Managing Director and its Board of Governors;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission's country- specific recommendations (CSRs)
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that the European Semester must in no way jeopardise the prerogatives of Parliament; urges the Commission to ensure the proper formal involvement of Parliament in all the steps of the European Semester process in order to increase the legitimacy of decisions which affect all citizens, including the preparation and discussion of CSRs for countries under Economic Adjustment Programmes in the context of the European Semester as a means to promote and enhance democratic legitimacy of the recommendations made in these countries;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that the European Semester must in no way jeopardise the prerogatives of Parliament; urges the Commission to ensure the proper formal involvement of Parliament in all the steps of the European Semester process in order to increase the legitimacy of decisions which affect all citizens; calls for Commission to find ways to increase the visibility of the process;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that the European Semester must in no way jeopardise the prerogatives of the National Parliaments; urges the Commission to ensure the proper formal involvement of National Parliaments and the European Parliament in all the steps of the European Semester process in order to increase the legitimacy of decisions which affect all citizens;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that the European Semester must in no way jeopardise the prerogatives
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need to strengthen the democratic accountability to Parliament of essential elements of the euro area's operation, such as the ESM, Eurogroup decisions and the monitoring and evaluation of financial assistance programmes; in this context asks European Commission to conduct and publish internal ex-post evaluation of its recommendations and participation in Troika;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need to strengthen the democratic accountability to national parliaments and the European Parliament of essential elements of the euro area's operation, such as the ESM, Eurogroup decisions and the monitoring and evaluation of financial assistance programmes;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need to strengthen the democratic accountability to National Parliaments of essential elements of the euro area's operation, such as the ESM, Eurogroup decisions and the monitoring and evaluation of financial assistance programmes;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Urges the Commission to ensure that Member States involve their national parliaments, the social partners and civil society in the European Semester process
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Urges the Commission to ensure that Member States involve their national parliaments
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the SMEs remains the backbone of the euro area economy, representing about 98% of all euro area firms, employing around three quarters of the euro area's employees and generating around 60% of value added;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Urges
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Urges the Commission to ensure that Member States involve their national parliaments, the social partners and civil society in the European Semester process as a whole, and particularly in the development
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Emphasises the importance of the dialogue between the European Parliament and national parliaments with a view to achieving a fully operational European Semester process and attaining the necessary level of democratic accountability with regard to all those involved;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Regrets the fact that the Council position on the country-specific recommendations proposed by the Commission was not made public in real time; regrets the fact that the European Council’s deliberations on the Council position on the country-specific recommendations were not made public in real time;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Stresses that there should be a clear division between competences between the EU and national level and that the European Parliament is the seat of accountability at the Union level; requests that whenever new competences are transferred to or created at Union level or when new Union institutions are established, a corresponding democratic control by, and accountability to, the European Parliament shall be ensured;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. Welcomes the Commission's country- specific recommendations (CSRs), however concludes that the methods to achieve the objectives laid down in the recommendations should be left to the Member States to decide upon;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas it is important to safeguard the role of the social partners and respect different national practises and institutions for wage formation when implementing the European semester;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas urgent action is required in many areas, inter alia in restoring lending to the real economy and SMEs, which involves developing alternative resources of financing and becoming less dependent on bank financing, in making the business environment more competitive, in increasing competition in the product and services markets, in fighting
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas urgent action is required in many areas, inter alia in restoring lending to the real economy and SMEs, in fighting tax fraud and aggressive tax planning, and in seeking effective
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 a (new) - whereas it is crucial that fiscal consolidation and restoring financial stability go hand-in-hand with well- designed structural reforms;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas urgent action is required in many areas, inter alia in advancing structural reforms, restoring the sustainability of public finances and restoring lending
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas urgent action is required in many areas, inter alia
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas urgent action is required in many areas, inter alia in restoring lending
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the democratic legitimacy of economic governance in the European Semester requires real and dedicated respect for parliamentary prerogatives at European and national
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the democratic legitimacy of economic governance in the European Semester requires real and dedicated respect for parliamentary prerogatives at European and national level and for those of the European Commission as laid down in the Treaties and EU legislation against the trend of an increasingly de- parliamentarised and intergovernmental culture of economic-policy making at EU level;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the democratic legitimacy of economic governance in the European Semester requires real and dedicated respect for parliamentary prerogatives at European and national level against the trend of an increasingly de- parliamentarised and intergovernmental culture of economic-policy making at
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. Whereas the involvement of social partners and civil society organisations is essential to perform social assessments of the impact of the crisis on the ground, hence allowing to take adequate measures;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, although in the case of Member States under a financial assistance programme recommendations have
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 a (new) - having regard to the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, although in the case of Member States under a financial assistance programme recommendations have been
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the 2-pack sets
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the single market and the cohesion of the EU must be secured.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘to be successful, policies need not only to be well designed but to have political and social support’, and that Europe needs
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘to be successful, policies need not only to be well designed but to have political and social support’, and that 'Europe needs
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s recognition that ‘to be successful, policies need not only to be well designed but to have political and social support’, and that Europe
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘to be successful, policies need not only to be well designed but to have political and social support’, and that Europe needs, beyond fiscal consolidation, real growth and specific and urgent action to tackle the unacceptably high levels of unemployment
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘to be successful, policies need not only to be well designed but to have political and social support’, and that Europe needs, beyond fiscal consolidation, real growth, strengthened competiveness, structural reforms and specific and urgent action to tackle the unacceptably high levels of unemployment and in particular youth unemployment;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘to be successful, policies need not only to be well designed but to have political and social support’, and that Europe needs, beyond fiscal consolidation, real growth , deep structural reforms, and specific and urgent action to tackle the unacceptably high levels of unemployment and the lack of competitiveness;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 b (new) - whereas the euro area sovereign debt crisis has a significant impact on the euro money market and the Eurosystem's extraordinary policy measures as well;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the achievements made in several Member States which allowed their deficit procedures to be closed;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘deficit’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘surplus’ countries need to boost their demand
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission’s recognition that ‘deficit’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘surplus’ countries need to boost their demand
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission’s recognition that ‘deficit’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘surplus’ countries need to boost their demand
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission’s recognition that ‘deficit’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘surplus’ countries need to boost their demand
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘deficit’ countries need to boost their competitiveness and that ‘surplus’ countries
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have not yet abated and the objective of a
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that ‘deficit’ countries need to boost their competitiveness
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that the EU economy as a whole needs to boost its competitiveness in the global economy, particularly by increasing competition in the product and services markets to enhance productivity and lower prices, and by keeping labour costs in line with productivity; stresses that the EU cannot compete on costs only but needs to invest more in research and development, education and skills, and resource efficiency;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that structural reforms are essential to kick-start growth and serve the dual goal of reducing unemployment and restoring the sustainability of public finances;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission and the Council to avoid taking a one-size-fits-all approach to the CSRs and ensure that recommendations are fine-tuned according to the national specificities and needs of the Member State concerned; calls on the Member States to assess the social impact of economic and structural reform plans, as well as to ensure a genuine evaluation process of their implementation for a more efficient cross-policy coordination and fine-tuning;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission and the Council to avoid taking a one-size-fits-all approach to the CSRs and ensure that recommendations are fine-tuned according to the national specificities and needs of the Member State concerned, while, however, the highest priority must be to stabilise the budget and the economy in the Member States concerned;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission and the Council to avoid taking a one-size-fits-all approach to the CSRs and ensure that recommendations are fine-tuned according to the national specificities and needs of the Member State concerned while remaining focused on firm structural reforms and growth-enhancing policies;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that sovereigns and financial institutions show persistent vulnerabilities in a low growth environment;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that that in only 15% of the around 400 country-specific recommendations the Commission has identified a significant degree of progress in comparison with previous years;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines that the lack of a properly defined methodological framework for assessing progress made in the framework of NRPs or for adopting and assessing CSRs; deems that the adoption of a legal framework for the ex-ante economic policy coordination offers a genuine opportunity for codifying further the CSRs and NRPs;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have not yet abated and the objective of a
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the Commission’s recommendations are directed not only at Member States but also to the euro area as a whole;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the Commission's recommendations are directed not only at Member States but also to the euro area as a whole; considers
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the Commission's recommendations are directed not only at Member States but also to the euro area as a whole; considers
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the Commission's recommendations are directed not only at Member States but also to the euro area as a whole; considers it regrettable, however, that the recommendations made to Member States do not take sufficiently into account the strong interdependence between EU economies, particularly within the euro area, or all the relevant information contained in the Alert Mechanism Report;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises the importance of the monitoring and the implementation of the country-specific recommendations, multilateral surveillance, the exchange of experiences and best practices and peer reviews as a mean of stimulating debate and peer pressure, thereby providing direction that helps to create the necessary momentum and acceptance of reforms;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for deeper investigation of the reasons for the huge increase in internal divergences in competitiveness and economic performance across Member States
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for deeper investigation of the reasons for the
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for deeper investigation of the reasons for the huge increase in internal divergences in competitiveness, fiscal consolidation and economic performance across Member States that have resulted from the functioning of the single currency
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for deeper investigation of the reasons for the huge increase in internal divergences in competitiveness and economic performance across Member States that may have resulted from the functioning of the single currency, and in particular of the asymmetric impact of common policies;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Demands from the Commission a thorough and transparent evaluation of the various economic governance measures including the macro-economic adjustment programmes prescribed by the Troika and to reflect on the criticism that is not only expressed by critical economists but also by Troika members themselves;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have not yet abated and
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on all Member States to respect their commitments under the Stability and Growth Pact and ensure the correction of any excessive deficits in accordance with agreed timetables;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for a prudent assessment of the
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for a prudent assessment of the ‘slow recovery’ growth forecasts as previous Commission forecasts have successively been revised downwards and
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the Commission to monitor EU2020 National objectives in Member States under financial assistance and to recommend with that purpose adapted CSRs taking proper account of the constraints created by macroeconomic adjustment programmes;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s recognition that European competitiveness ‘cannot and will not be based merely on costs’ and that it is essential to enhance productivity, investment in education, research and innovation and resource efficiency, in line with Europe 2020 goals; regrets therefore the lack of progress on the EU 2020 targets;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that European competitiveness
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission's recognition that European competitiveness ‘cannot and will not be based merely on costs’ and that it is essential to enhance productivity, social inclusion, investment in education and life-long learning, research and innovation and resource efficiency, in line with Europe 2020 goals; regrets therefore the lack of progress on the EU 2020 targets; calls for the above recognition to be adequately reflected in the ‘deficit’ countries' CSRs as these are the Member States which are in critical need of boosting their competitiveness;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the Commission's Country Specific Recommendations in the field of environmental taxation; highlights the positive budgetary, employment, social, and environmental impacts of environmental taxation and the phasing out of environmental harmful subsidies, calls on the Commission to make environmental taxation a priority in the upcoming Annual Growth Survey;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic, social, financial and sovereign debt crises have
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Regrets the
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Regrets the
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recalls its resolution of 23 May 2013 in which it considers that any further proposal towards a deeper EMU should be adopted by the ordinary legislative procedure according to the principle that steps towards enhanced economic policy coordination must go hand in hand with more solidarity;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to submit as a matter of urgency the legislative proposal on new financial incentives supporting Member States in the implementation of structural reforms
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to submit as a matter of urgency the legislative proposals on
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to submit
source: PE-516.691
2013/07/18
EMPL
88 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Calls on the Commission to adopt without delay the committed communication on the social dimension of the EMU and in that perspective to update the scoreboard of macroeconomic imbalances with a set of employment and social indicators together with the adoption of a standalone scoreboard related to the EMU social dimension;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out that the asymmetries in the Commission’s recommendations have led to an unprecedented increase in the socioeconomic and employment divergences between Member States; warns that despite slight improvements, the recommendations still contain asymmetries, making it likely that these divergences will further increase;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Urges the Commission to monitor EU2020 national objectives in Member States under financial assistance and to address with that purpose adapted country specific recommendation taking proper account of the constraints created by macroeconomic adjustment programmes;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Regrets that despite this Parliament’s repeated requests for national employment and youth employment plans to be presented in all the Member States, a significant number of these have still not done so;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls on the Commission and Council to continue to improve indicators to monitor the social, environmental and innovation dimension of the EU 2020 Strategy in the framework of the European Semester; calls for the development of quantitative and qualitative methodologies to improve the accuracy in assessments of the overall social and environmental realities currently not fully captured by comparable EU-level statistics;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Considers the Commission’s recognition of the need to reduce taxes on employment in favour of other sources of income, such as environmental taxation, to be a positive development; nevertheless asks the Commission to bear in mind that increased capital tax is needed in order to speed up the fiscal consolidation process more fairly;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that th
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that this year’s Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) are particularly important, because Member States define their investment priorities for cohesion policy in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF); calls in this context for
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that this year's Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) are particularly important, because Member States define their investment priorities for cohesion policy in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF); calls in this context for increased targeting of EU funding on
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that this year's Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) are particularly important, because Member States define their investment priorities for cohesion policy in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF); calls in this context for increased targeting of EU funding on growth and employment policies, especially on combating youth unemployment and long-term unemployment;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Is concerned with the growing view that migration would solve the youth unemployment issue; despite free movement of workers being a cornerstone of the Treaty, as an answer to the current crisis it brings the risk of brain drain, creates new imbalances between active/non active people and would finally contribute to the already ongoing polarization inside the EU and especially in the eurozone;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that several Member States have adopted major labour market reforms aimed at improving the resilience of the labour market, introducing more internal and external flexibility, reducing segmentation and facilitating transition between jobs; regrets that only a small number of these reforms have been carried out with adequate consensus among the social partners; asks the Commission, in its Country Specific Recommendations, to ensure that the necessary flexibility of the labour market maintains the extremely high levels of social protection which are the hallmark of our social model;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that several Member States have adopted major labour market reforms aimed at improving the resilience of the labour market, introducing more internal and external flexibility, reducing segmentation and facilitating transition between jobs; stresses the need, as part of these reforms, to introduce a minimum wage in the individual Member States which is tailored to the strength of the country’s economy in order to avoid precarious and degrading employment situations;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a.Notes with concern that the quest for greater competitiveness in Europe is only being pursued through wage devaluations and not through any increase in the productivity of our economies; asks the Commission to exclude essential investment in innovation and training from deficit calculations, in order to guarantee greater productivity in the EU as a whole;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes with great concern that the initial CSRs as proposed by the Commission for many Member States were very prescriptive regarding pension reforms while such reforms require national political and social cohesion and can only be successful when negotiated with social partners;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the debt to GDP ratio in some countries is still increasing and that employment and growth promoting measures must be stepped up in these Member States;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Deplores as insufficient the Commission’s recommendation to Member States with higher tax margins that they increase their internal demand and regrets the focus on reduction of social contributions rather than on increasing net wages; urges the Commission to review these recommendations;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market, reduce the cost of labour and combat labour market segmentation as well as match workers' skills with labour market demands;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active, comprehensive and inclusive labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market, reduce the cost of labour and combat labour market segmentation;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that all Member States have
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market,
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes the fundamental importance of increasing and enhancing pensions and wages, especially in those countries with more fragile economies, in order to revitalise their internal markets and improve living conditions for workers and their families;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the Commission's Country Specific Recommendations in the field of environmental taxation; highlights the positive budgetary, employment, social, and environmental impacts of shifting taxation from labour to environmental taxation and of the phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies, calls on the Commission to make environmental taxation a priority in the upcoming Annual Growth Survey;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. deplores that no CSRs address the challenge of the impact of the labour taxation regime on long term investment and the outcome in terms of job creation;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Deplores the Country Specific Recommendations aimed at the decentralisation of wage setting and collective bargaining; calls on the Commission to refrain from these recommendations in the future;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the situation of unemployed young people is particularly worrying and that urgent action is needed; asks for a European Pact for Youth Employment t
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the situation of unemployed young people is particularly worrying and that urgent action is needed; asks for a European Pact for Youth Employment that puts into effect the already long-agreed measures and commits new resources and measures to fighting youth unemployment, reducing the number of young people not in employment education or training (NEET) and poverty among young people, taking into account the qualitative aspect of decent work fully respecting core labour standards;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that some Member States have submitted reports on progress on the EU2020 targets, in some cases outlining the specific projects attributed to these goals; calls on all Member States to include these reports as part of their 2014 European Semester contributions; Regrets that the Commission has not presented a EU 2020 progress report; Calls on the Commission to present such a report annually;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. looks forward for the frontloading of the Youth Employment Initiative as per the EMPL committee's call through its amendments to the CPR;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF; calls on Member States to implement Youth Guarantee Schemes; notes with satisfaction that these funds can be used during the first two years of the following financial frameworks; recalls that this amount is, however, insufficient and should form an initial tranche with which to combat youth unemployment; emphasises that the International Labour Organisation (ILO) has calculated that EUR 21 billion is needed in order to carry out an effective programme to combat youth unemployment in the EU;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and observes that the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF; calls on Member States to implement Youth Guarantee Schemes and use available resources in an efficient way concentrating activities on those in the most difficult situation;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF; calls on Member States to implement Youth Guarantee Schemes; stresses that, according to the ILO, in order to effectively implement the Youth Guarantee Schemes within the Eurozone alone, €21 bn will be needed1, while the annual costs of youth unemployment in the Union amount to €153 bn, equivalent to 1.2% of the EU’s GDP2; calls on the Member States, therefore, to increase their efforts to fight youth unemployment; __________________ 1 see: International Labour Organization: Eurozone Job Crisis. Trends and Policy Responses. Geneva, 2012. 2 see: Eurofound: NEETs – Young people not in employment, education or training: characteristics, costs and policy responses in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2012
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF; calls on Member States to implement Youth Guarantee Schemes; calls on the Commission and Council to ensure that also Member States in the excessive deficit procedure have the fiscal space to make use of these measures, in particular by temporarily exempting the Member States' co-financing of measures to combat youth unemployment from the calculation of the excessive deficit;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF; calls on Member States to urgently implement Youth Guarantee Schemes;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need to ensure greater equity in tax systems, in particular more progressive tax systems and the shifting of the tax base from labour to other sources;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that Parliament, in its report on the Annual Growth Strategy, called for a strategy able to make austerity programmes compatible with growth incentives and job creation; therefore believes that even with the introduction of slight changes in the fiscal consolidation calendar, the Country Specific Recommendations presented by the Commission remain insufficient to achieve these objectives; warns that the Country Specific Recommendations made in relation to structural reform may have the same negative impact on growth and employment as the previous austerity policy;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Commission to continue the work of the Youth Employment Action Teams to help the Member States with the highest levels of youth unemployment to
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Commission to continue the work of the Youth Employment Action Teams to help the Member States with the highest levels of youth unemployment to reprogramme EU structural funding in order to target it at young people; welcomes the Commission’s intention to build on the European Job Mobility Portal (EURES) by intensifying and broadening its activities and, in particular, by promoting youth mobility; calls on the Commission to propose a quality framework for traineeships comprising, inter alia, the criteria for fair remuneration, learning outcomes, working conditions and safety and health standards; calls on the Commission, Member States and the European social partners to implement the Alliance for Apprenticeships in an ambitious manner;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Commission to continue the work of the Youth Employment Action Teams to help the Member States with the highest levels of youth unemployment to reprogramme EU structural funding of the 2007-2013 Multiannual Financial Framework in order to target it at young people; welcomes the Commission's intention to build on the European Job Mobility Portal (EURES) by intensifying and broadening its activities and, in particular, by promoting youth mobility;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes there is an urgent need, given the numbers of workers, particularly young people, departing their countries of origin for others within the EU in search of employment opportunities, to develop appropriate measures to guarantee the portability of social rights obtained in this process, particularly unemployment and pension rights; believes that, given this situation, EURES should play a more significant role in labour mediation amongst the various Member States; welcomes the improvements to the European mobility portal and calls for a specific strategy to be drafted for it, together with the Member States;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. welcomes the fact that for the first time, some CSRs address the particular situation of Member States regarding poverty; deeply condemns the fact that no CSR addresses in particular the case of labour market from which women are excluded and where no measure is foreseen to include them;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on Member States to put in place schemes to ensure greater access to finance for SMEs in order to boost employment growth;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses the need for greater fiscal flexibility to meet the specific needs of different Member States;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that particular action is needed to increase the labour participation of women, older workers and workers with disabilities by ensuring that there are efficient incentives to return to, and stay in, work; recalls that the quality, affordability and accessibility of services related to early childhood education
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the long-term unemployed should be supported by activation incentives, such as welfare-to-work programmes, and
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the long-term unemployed should be supported by job creation and integrated active inclusion approaches including positive activation incentives
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the neoliberal so-called austerity measures that have been reinforced, inter alia as part of the national reform plans, economic governance and the European Semester, are contributing to a deepening of the economic and social crisis in a number of countries with more fragile economies, making life more and more difficult for working-class families and, in particular, for women and children, who are the main victims of the increase in poverty, unemployment, and precarious and poorly paid work;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines that Member States should rigorously introduce measures to enhance workers’ security by phasing out precarious employment and atypical contractual arrangements, in order to restrict and reduce insecure forms of employment, the abusive use of which should be punished; points out that Member States therefore have a responsibility to introduce a combination of secure and reliable employment contracts, active and integrative labour- market policies, lifelong learning and effective, high-quality social security systems, accompanied by clear entitlements for the unemployed, providing them with adequate benefits and tailor-made measures to enable them to find quality employment or training and upgrade their skills and competences where necessary;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the large economic and job potential of the services sector remains untapped; calls for full and appropriate implementation of the EU Services Directive;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the large economic and job potential of the services sector remains untapped; calls for full and appropriate implementation of the EU Services Directive; calls on Member States to remove barriers in the retail sector and excessive restrictions in professional services and regulated professions; at the same time calls to remove barriers to the free movement of workers in order to improve mobility and optimise the use of the EU human capital;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Recalls th
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Highlights the job potential of the green economy which according to Commission estimates could create 5 million jobs by 2020 in the energy efficiency and renewable energy sectors alone, provided that ambitious climate and energy policies are put in place; calls on the Member States to ensure sufficient levels of investment in these sectors and to anticipate future skills of workers and to guarantee job quality of 'Green jobs'; calls on the Commission to include the exploitation of the job potential of the green economy as a key priority in the Annual Growth Survey of 2014;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. asks the European Commission to produce a green book on a eurozone minimum unemployment allowance as an automatic stabiliser, following the debate in plenary on the social dimension of the EMU and the hearing organised on 9 July 2013 by the EMPL committee of the European Parliament;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls th
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls the skills mismatches and bottlenecks in many regions and sectors and the inadequacy of certain education and training systems to cope with market demands; welcomes the reforms of vocational education and training systems undertaken by several Member States in order to adapt skills and competences to labour market needs, especially those of young people; recalls that almost all Member States need to undertake further action and investment in the field of education and training; observes that austerity measures and budgetary consolidation requirements must not prevent investment in training and in secure, non-precarious jobs;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls the skills mismatches and bottlenecks in many regions and sectors and the inadequacy of certain education and training systems to cope with market demands;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Expresses its concerns about a general lack of ambition and progress on the EU2020 targets; calls for the EU2020 targets to be put at the heart of the European Semester with Member States setting ambitious national targets detailing strategies to reach them and with progress visibly monitored through the National Reform Programmes, the Country Specific Recommendations and in the Annual Growth Survey; calls on the Commission to systematically address recommendations to Member States on each of the EU2020 targets where there is a lack of progress;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls the skills mismatches and bottlenecks in many regions and sectors and the inadequacy of certain education and training systems to cope with market
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls the skills mismatches and bottlenecks in many regions and sectors and the inadequacy of certain education and training systems to cope with market demands; welcomes the reforms of vocational education and training systems undertaken by several Member States in order to adapt skills and competences to labour market needs, especially those of young people; recalls that almost all Member States need to undertake further action and investment in the field of education
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Observes that, in addition to the reform of the education and training sector, a long-term sustainable, criteria- based immigration strategy is needed in order to respond to the shortage of skilled labour and demographic change;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the crisis has had a severe and lasting impact on the Member States’ levels of unemployment and their social situation, which has led to unsustainable increases in poverty and social exclusion, including child poverty, homelessness, in- work poverty and over-indebtedness of households; calls in this context on Member States to reinforce the safety nets and ensure the effectiveness of the welfare systems that deal with those affected; Emphasises that economic and social decline has exhausted the national fiscal stabilisers in a number of Member States, while others enjoy comfortable margins; asks the Commission to put forward a proposal for a European automatic stabiliser, as defined in its December 2012 Blueprint, as soon as possible;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the crisis has had a severe and lasting impact on the Member States’ levels of unemployment and their social situation, which has led to unsustainable increases in poverty and social exclusion, including child poverty, homelessness, in- work poverty and over-indebtedness of households; calls in this context on Member States to reinforce the safety nets and ensure the effectiveness of the welfare systems that deal with those affected; observes that austerity measures to consolidate budgets must not result in the people concerned being deprived of necessary support payments;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the crisis has had a severe and lasting impact on the Member States' levels of unemployment and their social situation, which has led to unsustainable increases in poverty and social exclusion, including child poverty, homelessness, in- work poverty and over-indebtedness of households; calls in this context on Member States to reinforce the safety nets and ensure the effectiveness of the welfare systems that deal with those affected as well as invest in preventive measures;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the crisis
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the crisis exacerbated by pro-cyclical fiscal consolidation policies has had a severe and lasting impact on the Member States' levels of unemployment and their social situation, which has led to unsustainable increases in poverty and social exclusion, including child poverty, homelessness, social inequality, in-
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the crisis has had a severe and lasting impact on the Member States' levels of unemployment and their social situation, which has led to unsustainable increases in poverty and social exclusion, including child poverty, homelessness, in- work poverty and over-indebtedness of households; calls in this context on Member States to reinforce the safety nets and ensure the effectiveness of the welfare systems that deal with those affected; urges the Commission to take account of the impact of the economic adjustment programmes on progress towards the Europe 2020 headline targets in those Member States experiencing financial difficulties and to agree modifications aimed at bringing the adjustment programmes into line with the Europe 2020 objectives;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Strongly believes that CSRs in the context of the European Semester would become much more relevant and efficient once indicators in the social field - which should be taken on board in the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure and on an autonomous basis - and a scoreboard will be established;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers, in this respect, that public pension systems are to a considerable extent cushioning the negative social impacts; regrets that the Commission’s recommendations, particularly with regard to the legal age of retirement and its connection with life expectancy, were made without reference to the recommendations of the European Parliament in its reports on the green and white papers on pensions;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Emphasises that, to emerge stronger from the economic and social crisis, enjoy higher levels of growth and ensure their systems of welfare in the long term, the Member States should promote quality public services, making full use of their workforces’ potential, guaranteeing workers’ rights and promoting collective bargaining and public, universally- available social security;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the fact that this year many Member States made a greater effort to involve national parliaments, the social partners and civil society in drawing up their national reform programmes;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes th
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the fact that this year many Member States made a greater effort to involve national parliaments, the social partners and civil society in drawing up their national reform programmes; reiterates its call for increased democratic legitimacy for the European Semester and stresses that the engagement of all stakeholders in the development of the necessary reforms is crucial to their delivery and success
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission and Council to enter into an interinstitutional agreement with Parliament in order to give Parliament a full role in the drafting and approval of the Annual Growth Survey and the Economic Policy and Employment Guidelines;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Regrets that this Parliament’s report on the National Reform Plans proposed by the Commission was drafted after their approval by the Council; urges the Commission to revise the calendar for the European Semester to ensure that the process enjoys full democratic legitimacy, particularly once the Country Specific Recommendations become binding on the Member States after approval of the six- pack.
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. invites the Commission to fully integrate this opinion in the drafting of the Annual Growth Survey 2014;
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Commission to come up with a proposal to significantly strengthen and improve the involvement of social partners at the European level in the design, implementation and monitoring of policy guidance in social and employment matters of the European Semester;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores the fact that the EU 27 is now in recession and that current fiscal policies are not reversing this process; calls therefore on the Commission to re- evaluate its approach in light of this fact and the unacceptable levels of youth and long-term unemployment in many Member States;
source: PE-516.693
2013/08/30
BUDG
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates that for Parliament, the compromise reached at the European
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports both the EU Youth Guarantee and the proposed Youth Employment Initiative as useful means to fight the unacceptably high level of youth unemployment;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new) 1. Stresses the importance of Science and Innovation for the strategic development of competitiveness and, therefore, job creation at European level to overcome the economic and financial crisis.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – indent 1 (new) - Underlines the importance of the European Semester to monitor the structural reforms adopted by the Member States, namely the framework conditions for innovation.
source: PE-516.885
2013/09/05
FEMM
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation (new) – having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Strategy for equality between women and men 2010- 2015’ (COM(2010)0491);
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take due account of gender-related targets in national employment programmes, paying particular attention to women with elderly dependents, single mothers and women with disabled children; calls, furthermore, for proper attention to be paid to the issue of early school leaving, given the sharp rise in the number of children who drop out of education between the ages of 10 and 16 and the loss of resources that this clearly represents for the EU as a whole;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission, in its upcoming Annual Growth Survey, to raise the issue of specific policy guidelines on reducing gender inequalities, including, in particular, guidelines on closing the gender pay gap and the gender pension gap which often results in women finding themselves below the poverty line at a later stage of their lives, on increasing the participation of women in the labour market and on combating gender segregation in the labour market as the future economic prosperity of the EU depends crucially on its ability to fully utilise its labour resources;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to include the European Semester as one of the Europe 2020 subtargets in order to fight against youth unemployment and poverty;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that only if Europe makes structural changes to its macroeconomic policies will it be possible to promote sustainable development and social cohesion and strengthen jobs with rights and public services, and that without these guarantees, gender equality can never be transformed from good intentions into a practical reality; considers that monetary and tax policies in the EU have had a negative impact on the growth of the economy and employment, and recalls that monetary policy should contribute to strengthening economic recovery and fighting unemployment;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out the importance of gender budgeting with the aim to examine all government programmes and policies, their effects on resource allocation and their contribution to equality between women and men;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A (new) A. whereas new technology affords both employers and employees new opportunities for organising work in such a way as to strike a better work-life balance and thus make the labour market more inclusive for women;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that austerity measures that seek to reduce public deficits by cutting public sector jobs and welfare services have a bigger impact on women than on men; observes that the introduction of austerity measures significantly increased long-term unemployment among women; stresses that fiscal tightening should not jeopardise the progress achieved by policies promoting gender equality;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of public investment at EU and national level to promote social and economic cohesion, particularly with regard to investment in less developed regions; therefore considers it essential to eliminate all so- called budgetary consolidation policies because of their negative impact on the proper implementation of the structural funds and investment in general; stresses that spending on education, social services, R&D and infrastructure, including renewable energies, transport and communications, constitute an investment in the future of any country;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) to improve childcare facilities, remove disincentives for second earners, harmonise the statutory retirement age for men and women, accommodate needs to combine work and private life, in particular by improving access to new technologies and to training in the use of those technologies, and eliminate gender and pension gaps; expresses its concern about the fact that many of these recommendations were already laid down in 2012, indicating a lack of implementation in Member States;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that Member States should improve the percentage of children or young adults in educational systems and put more focus on the problem of early school leaving, especially by collecting information on the main reasons for early school leaving in order to adopt and implement policies for its prevention;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. welcomes the creation of a link between the European Roma Integration Process and the European Semester articulating Country Specific Recommendations for further enhancing Roma inclusion process
source: PE-516.918
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-514719_EN.html
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-516662_EN.html
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-514705_EN.html
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.640New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-514640_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.691New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-516691_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.761&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-514761_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.623&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-514623_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.719&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.662&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.705&secondRef=02
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131023&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-23-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-322&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0322_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-447New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0447_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/12854New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/1/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-06-20T00:00:00New
2013-07-04T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-10-23T00:00:00New
2013-09-30T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3268&dd_DATE_REUNION=22/10/2013&single_date=22/10/2013New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3268*&MEET_DATE=22/10/2013 |
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-07-04T00:00:00New
2013-10-23T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188bf0fb8127435bdc3b1New
4f1adc07b819f207b30000f9 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184b70fb8127435bdbdf2New
4f1ac7f4b819f25efd0000bb |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4e73ac94559f84559a58cc89New
4f1ac45bb819f25896000009 |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de184830fb8127435bdbda4New
4f1ac7c9b819f25efd0000ac |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186660fb8127435bdc057New
4f1ad26fb819f27595000024 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183fd0fb8127435bdbceaNew
4f1ac73fb819f25efd000076 |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1887f0fb8127435bdc358New
4f1adb40b819f207b30000b4 |
committees/6/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184620fb8127435bdbd78New
4f1ac79cb819f25efd000099 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-322&language=EN
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.691
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-10-22T00:00:00New
2013-10-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/text |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|