BETA


2013/2249(DEC) 2012 discharge: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT RÜBIG Paul (icon: PPE PPE) STAVRAKAKIS Georgios (icon: S&D S&D), GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ANDREASEN Marta (icon: ECR ECR), VANHECKE Frank (icon: EFD EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2014/09/05
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/623/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of its budget for the financial year 2012.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014).

Amongst the main observations made, Parliament made a number of cross-cutting comments as regards all the Joint Undertakings (JUs) and invited the Court of Auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the JUs in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks - notably reputational - presented.

2014/04/03
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/04/03
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.The vote on the discharge decision covered the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).

Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 72, with 16 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

Budgetary and Financial Management : Parliament noted that the Joint Undertaking's final amended budget for the financial year 2012 included commitment appropriations of EUR 205.4 million and payment appropriations of EUR 167.9 million. It was concerned with the recurring low implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking and regretted the EUR 25.7 million cash balance at the end of the year, representing 15% of the available payment appropriations. For the Parliament, this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. It reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium. Utilisation rate and carryovers : Parliament observed that while the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84% overall, the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. It noted, moreover, that within this, the operational implementation rate was 97% for commitment appropriations and 84% for payment appropriations. It remained concerned that these rates reflect the significant delays in the implementation of the activities as compared with the initial plan and called on the Joint Undertaking to continue to improve its workflows and processes to shorten the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements. Audit : Parliament was concerned that while the audit certificates accompanying the cost claims of two beneficiaries were found to include reservations about the contracts of the staff employed on the project and in one of them, the audit certificate also included reservations on the indirect cost rates applied, the Joint Undertaking released the payments, underlining that these payments were not irregular.

Parliament also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

It invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

JTI : Parliament invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Parliament noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. It recalled that the total Union contribution deemed necessary for the Joint Undertakings for their period of existence amounts to EUR 11.5 billion.

It recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Parliament agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

Documents
2014/04/03
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/04/02
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2014/03/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Petri SARVAMAA (EPP, FI) in which it recommended the European Parliament to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.

Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the Undertaking for the financial year 2012 are reliable, and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approved the closure of the Undertaking’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

Budgetary and Financial Management : Members noted that the Joint Undertaking's final amended budget for the financial year 2012 included commitment appropriations of EUR 205.4 million and payment appropriations of EUR 167.9 million. They are concerned with the recurring low implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking and regretted the EUR 25.7 million cash balance at the end of the year, representing 15% of the available payment appropriations. For Members, this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. They reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium. Utilisation rate and carryovers : Members observed that while the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84% overall, the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. They noted, moreover, that within this, the operational implementation rate was 97% for commitment appropriations and 84% for payment appropriations. They remained concerned that these rates reflect the significant delays in the implementation of the activities as compared with the initial plan and called on the Joint Undertaking to continue to improve its workflows and processes to shorten the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements.

Members also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

They invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

JTI : Members invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Members noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. They recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Members agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

Documents
2014/03/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2014/02/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2014/02/05
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Details

Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2012 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2012 of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking, and the report by the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012.

The observations in the Court of Auditors' report in relation to the financial year 2012 call for some comments by the Council, which may be summarised as follows:

Excessive carry-overs : in order to avoid excessive carry-overs, the Council calls on the Joint Undertaking to pay due attention to the proper implementation of commitment and payment appropriations in the course of the budgetary year and to decommit unused appropriations if necessary, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality. It welcomes the improvements achieved so far in the overall implementation rates. Calls for proposals : the Council invites the Joint Undertaking, to implement further improvements as regards the expenditure relating to calls for proposals, and in particular to closure of projects, in order to achieve a better execution rate of payment appropriations in the future. Internal control systems : the Council welcomes the Joint Undertaking's replies with regard to the completion of the financial application for the management of grants and invites the Joint Undertakings to continue efforts related to the improvement of its control systems and procedures, notably the ex-ante control of cost claims, and to provide more clarity to all actors through dedicated workshops and trainings. As regards the Court's remarks on the internal audit function, the Council invites the Joint Undertaking to bring its own Financial Rules concerning the internal audit arrangements, and in particular those regarding the powers of the Commission's internal auditor, in line with the revised Framework Financial Regulation. Moreover, the Council takes note of the weaknesses detected by the Commission's Internal Audit Service regarding delays in the implementation of the programme and the system of evaluating the utilisation of resources and asks the Joint Undertaking to remedy the detected weaknesses without delay. Research results : the Council also invites the Joint Undertaking to improve the monitoring and reporting of research results, in line with the provision of the relevant regulations of the Seventh Framework Programmes.

Documents
2014/01/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/10/22
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, together with the Joint Undertaking’s reply.

CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.

This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking.

In the Court’s opinion, the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking’s Annual Accounts fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.

It considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year ended 31 December 2012 are, in all material respects, legal and regular .

The report confirms that the resources available to the Joint Undertaking in 2012 amount to EUR 205 364 690 in commitment appropriations.

The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Joint Undertaking, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:

Court’s comments :

implementation of the budget: the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84%, while the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. The lower rate for payment appropriations reflects delays in the implementation of the budget, mainly as a result of delays in the implementation of activities and in the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements; audit procedures: during 2012 the Joint Undertaking further improved its management, administrative, financial and accounting procedures. One of the main achievements in 2012 was the implementation of the ‘GMT tool’, a specific application for managing financial information relating to the implementation of grant agreements with members. However, the GMT tool still presents some limitations as regards the completeness of the operational information managed. The Court notes that a certain number of weaknesses were noted in respect of the ex ante control of cost claims submitted by Clean Sky partners.

Joint Undertaking’s replies :

implementation of the budget: the JU points out that for the larger part of its operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate for commitment appropriations was 97% while the rate for PA was 84%. It acknowledges that for the expenditure relating to calls for proposals, further improvements need to be implemented to enable the JU to close more reports on time and execute higher payment appropriations overall. Overall the JU has experienced a descending trend in the last calls, by permanently seeking to improve its workflow and processes for the purpose of decreasing the time to grant; on internal audits, the JU's management has agreed actions to mitigate the observations issued by the auditors.

As regards the activities of the Joint Undertaking in 2012 , the report refers to the Annual Activity Report 2012 which can be found at www.cleansky.eu

2013/10/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/10/10
   EP - RÜBIG Paul (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2013/07/26
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
2013/07/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published

Documents

Votes

A7-0210/2014 - Paul Rübig - Résolution #

2014/04/03 Outcome: +: 476, -: 72, 0: 16
DE FR ES IT RO SE PT PL HU BE NL BG AT SK HR FI LT EL EE DK LV SI IE CZ CY MT LU GB
Total
73
54
40
52
18
18
18
41
16
18
23
15
16
12
10
8
9
9
6
10
7
6
5
16
4
4
3
53
icon: PPE PPE
195

Belgium PPE

3

Greece PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2
2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
151

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
20

France NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
22

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Bulgaria EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
45

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
11 2013/2249(DEC)
2014/02/26 CONT 11 amendments...
source: PE-528.205

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2013-07-26T00:00:00
docs
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0
date
2013-07-25T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
events/0
date
2013-07-26T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-04-02-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/4
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.706
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-521706_EN.html
docs/2/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE528.205
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-528205_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2014-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0210_EN.html title: A7-0210/2014
summary
events/3
date
2014-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0210_EN.html title: A7-0210/2014
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0332_EN.html title: T7-0332/2014
summary
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0332_EN.html title: T7-0332/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: RÜBIG Paul date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RÜBIG Paul group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0210&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0210_EN.html
events/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0332 title: T7-0332/2014
summary
events/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24445&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0332 title: T7-0332/2014
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0332
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0332_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570 title: COM(2013)0570 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52013DC0570:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2014-03-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0210&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0210/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0332 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0332/2014 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RÜBIG Paul group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2013:369:TOC title: OJ C 369 17.12.2013, p. 0010 title: N7-0006/2014 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, together with the Joint Undertaking’s reply. CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit. This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking. In the Court’s opinion, the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking’s Annual Accounts fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer. It considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year ended 31 December 2012 are, in all material respects, legal and regular . The report confirms that the resources available to the Joint Undertaking in 2012 amount to EUR 205 364 690 in commitment appropriations. The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Joint Undertaking, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows: Court’s comments : implementation of the budget: the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84%, while the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. The lower rate for payment appropriations reflects delays in the implementation of the budget, mainly as a result of delays in the implementation of activities and in the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements; audit procedures: during 2012 the Joint Undertaking further improved its management, administrative, financial and accounting procedures. One of the main achievements in 2012 was the implementation of the ‘GMT tool’, a specific application for managing financial information relating to the implementation of grant agreements with members. However, the GMT tool still presents some limitations as regards the completeness of the operational information managed. The Court notes that a certain number of weaknesses were noted in respect of the ex ante control of cost claims submitted by Clean Sky partners. Joint Undertaking’s replies : implementation of the budget: the JU points out that for the larger part of its operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate for commitment appropriations was 97% while the rate for PA was 84%. It acknowledges that for the expenditure relating to calls for proposals, further improvements need to be implemented to enable the JU to close more reports on time and execute higher payment appropriations overall. Overall the JU has experienced a descending trend in the last calls, by permanently seeking to improve its workflow and processes for the purpose of decreasing the time to grant; on internal audits, the JU's management has agreed actions to mitigate the observations issued by the auditors. As regards the activities of the Joint Undertaking in 2012 , the report refers to the Annual Activity Report 2012 which can be found at www.cleansky.eu type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2014-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.706 title: PE521.706 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2014-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5851%2F14&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05851/2014 summary: Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2012 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2012 of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking, and the report by the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012. The observations in the Court of Auditors' report in relation to the financial year 2012 call for some comments by the Council, which may be summarised as follows: Excessive carry-overs : in order to avoid excessive carry-overs, the Council calls on the Joint Undertaking to pay due attention to the proper implementation of commitment and payment appropriations in the course of the budgetary year and to decommit unused appropriations if necessary, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality. It welcomes the improvements achieved so far in the overall implementation rates. Calls for proposals : the Council invites the Joint Undertaking, to implement further improvements as regards the expenditure relating to calls for proposals, and in particular to closure of projects, in order to achieve a better execution rate of payment appropriations in the future. Internal control systems : the Council welcomes the Joint Undertaking's replies with regard to the completion of the financial application for the management of grants and invites the Joint Undertakings to continue efforts related to the improvement of its control systems and procedures, notably the ex-ante control of cost claims, and to provide more clarity to all actors through dedicated workshops and trainings. As regards the Court's remarks on the internal audit function, the Council invites the Joint Undertaking to bring its own Financial Rules concerning the internal audit arrangements, and in particular those regarding the powers of the Commission's internal auditor, in line with the revised Framework Financial Regulation. Moreover, the Council takes note of the weaknesses detected by the Commission's Internal Audit Service regarding delays in the implementation of the programme and the system of evaluating the utilisation of resources and asks the Joint Undertaking to remedy the detected weaknesses without delay. Research results : the Council also invites the Joint Undertaking to improve the monitoring and reporting of research results, in line with the provision of the relevant regulations of the Seventh Framework Programmes. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE528.205 title: PE528.205 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2013)0570 summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012, as part of the 2012 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking . CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking. In 2012, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows: description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking : the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking, which is located in Brussels, was established in 2007 by Regulation (EC) No 71/2008 for the period up to 31 December 2017. The aim of this entity is to accelerate the development, validation and demonstration of clean air transport technologies in the EU and in particular to create a radically innovative Air Transport System with the target of reducing the environmental impact of air transport. budget of the Joint Undertaking for the 2012 financial year : the maximum indicative contribution of the Commission amounts to EUR 800 million, paid out under the 7th Research Framework Programme for research and technological development until 2017. The cumulative unrecognised share of losses is EUR 48 million (62.89% ownership participation). Please also consult Clean Sky Joint Undertaking’s final accounts.
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0210&language=EN title: A7-0210/2014 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Petri SARVAMAA (EPP, FI) in which it recommended the European Parliament to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the Undertaking for the financial year 2012 are reliable, and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approved the closure of the Undertaking’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies. Budgetary and Financial Management : Members noted that the Joint Undertaking's final amended budget for the financial year 2012 included commitment appropriations of EUR 205.4 million and payment appropriations of EUR 167.9 million. They are concerned with the recurring low implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking and regretted the EUR 25.7 million cash balance at the end of the year, representing 15% of the available payment appropriations. For Members, this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. They reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium. Utilisation rate and carryovers : Members observed that while the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84% overall, the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. They noted, moreover, that within this, the operational implementation rate was 97% for commitment appropriations and 84% for payment appropriations. They remained concerned that these rates reflect the significant delays in the implementation of the activities as compared with the initial plan and called on the Joint Undertaking to continue to improve its workflows and processes to shorten the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements. Members also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls. They invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure. JTI : Members invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Members noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. They recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Members agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0332 title: T7-0332/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.The vote on the discharge decision covered the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure). Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 72, with 16 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies. Budgetary and Financial Management : Parliament noted that the Joint Undertaking's final amended budget for the financial year 2012 included commitment appropriations of EUR 205.4 million and payment appropriations of EUR 167.9 million. It was concerned with the recurring low implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking and regretted the EUR 25.7 million cash balance at the end of the year, representing 15% of the available payment appropriations. For the Parliament, this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. It reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium. Utilisation rate and carryovers : Parliament observed that while the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84% overall, the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. It noted, moreover, that within this, the operational implementation rate was 97% for commitment appropriations and 84% for payment appropriations. It remained concerned that these rates reflect the significant delays in the implementation of the activities as compared with the initial plan and called on the Joint Undertaking to continue to improve its workflows and processes to shorten the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements. Audit : Parliament was concerned that while the audit certificates accompanying the cost claims of two beneficiaries were found to include reservations about the contracts of the staff employed on the project and in one of them, the audit certificate also included reservations on the indirect cost rates applied, the Joint Undertaking released the payments, underlining that these payments were not irregular. Parliament also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls. It invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure. JTI : Parliament invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Parliament noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. It recalled that the total Union contribution deemed necessary for the Joint Undertakings for their period of existence amounts to EUR 11.5 billion. It recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Parliament agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/623/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012. CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of its budget for the financial year 2012. This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014). Amongst the main observations made, Parliament made a number of cross-cutting comments as regards all the Joint Undertakings (JUs) and invited the Court of Auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the JUs in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks - notably reputational - presented.
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/7/14232
New
  • CONT/7/14232
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0318
New
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0318
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.02 2012 discharge
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/6
date
2014-09-05T00:00:00
text

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/623/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of its budget for the financial year 2012.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014).

Amongst the main observations made, Parliament made a number of cross-cutting comments as regards all the Joint Undertakings (JUs) and invited the Court of Auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the JUs in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks - notably reputational - presented.

type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
title
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0318
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/2/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/2/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.The vote on the discharge decision covered the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).

    Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 72, with 16 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

    • Budgetary and Financial Management: Parliament noted that the Joint Undertaking's final amended budget for the financial year 2012 included commitment appropriations of EUR 205.4 million and payment appropriations of EUR 167.9 million. It was concerned with the recurring low implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking and regretted the EUR 25.7 million cash balance at the end of the year, representing 15% of the available payment appropriations. For the Parliament, this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. It reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium.
    • Utilisation rate and carryovers: Parliament observed that while the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84% overall, the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. It noted, moreover, that within this, the operational implementation rate was 97% for commitment appropriations and 84% for payment appropriations. It remained concerned that these rates reflect the significant delays in the implementation of the activities as compared with the initial plan and called on the Joint Undertaking to continue to improve its workflows and processes to shorten the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements.
    • Audit: Parliament was concerned that while the audit certificates accompanying the cost claims of two beneficiaries were found to include reservations about the contracts of the staff employed on the project and in one of them, the audit certificate also included reservations on the indirect cost rates applied, the Joint Undertaking released the payments, underlining that these payments were not irregular.

    Parliament also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

    It invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

    JTI: Parliament invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Parliament noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. It recalled that the total Union contribution deemed necessary for the Joint Undertakings for their period of existence amounts to EUR 11.5 billion.

    It recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Parliament agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0332
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
docs
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0332/2014
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities/4/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Petri SARVAMAA (EPP, FI) in which it recommended the European Parliament to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.

    Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the Undertaking for the financial year 2012 are reliable, and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approved the closure of the Undertaking’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

    • Budgetary and Financial Management: Members noted that the Joint Undertaking's final amended budget for the financial year 2012 included commitment appropriations of EUR 205.4 million and payment appropriations of EUR 167.9 million. They are concerned with the recurring low implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking and regretted the EUR 25.7 million cash balance at the end of the year, representing 15% of the available payment appropriations. For Members, this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. They reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium.
    • Utilisation rate and carryovers: Members observed that while the utilisation rate for commitment appropriations was 84% overall, the rate for payment appropriations was 75%. They noted, moreover, that within this, the operational implementation rate was 97% for commitment appropriations and 84% for payment appropriations. They remained concerned that these rates reflect the significant delays in the implementation of the activities as compared with the initial plan and called on the Joint Undertaking to continue to improve its workflows and processes to shorten the period between the publication of calls for proposals and the signing of grant agreements.

    Members also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

    They invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

    JTI: Members invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Members noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. They recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Members agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
New
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/3
date
2014-03-20T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0210&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0210/2014
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2014-03-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
ANDREASEN Marta
committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
ANDREASEN Marta
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1
date
2013-10-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/14232
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012, as part of the 2012 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking.

    CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking.

    In 2012, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows:

    • description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking: the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking, which is located in Brussels, was established in 2007 by Regulation (EC) No 71/2008 for the period up to 31 December 2017. The aim of this entity is to accelerate the development, validation and demonstration of clean air transport technologies in the EU and in particular to create a radically innovative Air Transport System with the target of reducing the environmental impact of air transport.
    • budget of the Joint Undertaking for the 2012 financial year: the maximum indicative contribution of the Commission amounts to EUR 800 million,  paid out under the 7th Research Framework Programme for research and technological development until 2017. The cumulative unrecognised share of losses is EUR 48 million (62.89% ownership participation).

    Please also consult Clean Sky Joint Undertaking’s final accounts.

activities/0/docs/0/url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 docs: celexid: CELEX:52013DC0570:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2013)0570 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subject
8.70.03.02 2012 discharge
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
reference
2013/2249(DEC)
title
2012 discharge: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking