BETA


2013/2250(DEC) 2012 discharge: Artemis Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT RÜBIG Paul (icon: PPE PPE) STAVRAKAKIS Georgios (icon: S&D S&D), GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ANDREASEN Marta (icon: ECR ECR), VANHECKE Frank (icon: EFD EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2014/09/05
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/621/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of its budget for the financial year 2012.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014).

Amongst the main observations made, Parliament made a number of cross-cutting comments as regards all the Joint Undertakings (JUs) and invited the Court of Auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the JUs in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks - notably reputational - presented. It stressed that such assessment has an urgent character as regards Artemis and ENIAC Joint Undertakings.

2014/04/03
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/04/03
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012. The vote on the discharge decision approved the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament.

Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, Parliament adopted by 480 votes to 64, with 18 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations that form an integral part of the discharge decision and as well as the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

These recommendations are summarised as follows:

Qualified opinion : Parliament was concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. It stressed that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively. Parliament noted that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits. It reiterated that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls. Budgetary and Financial Management : Parliament recalled that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States' NFAs amounted to EUR 7.3 million, which represents 43% of total operational payments. It is concerned that the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs. It also noted that the Joint Undertaking's initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55.1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39.5 million. It regretted the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62% and reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States. Implementation rate and carryovers : Parliament was concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking. It emphasised that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17.2 million, representing 57% of the authorised payment appropriations. It ascertained from the Court of Auditors' report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget. Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (ECSEL) Joint Undertaking : Parliament recalled the continued worries of the discharge authority concerning the low implementation rates of their budget and, moreover, the underlying activities of the Joint Undertakings associated with high cash balances. It recalled that it sought to increase and leverage private and public investments in research and innovation in two complementary domains of high importance for the industrial fabric in Europe. It noted that the Commission made a proposal , in the context of the implementation of Horizon 2020, to combine Embedded computing systems (Artemis) and Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) into a single initiative and therefore, winding-up ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings before their normal end of life up to 31 December 2017. It stated that the new Joint Undertaking in the field of electronic components and systems called ECSEL ('Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership') will take the form of a tripartite institutional Public-Private Partnership (PPP) with a dedicated legal entity. It recalled Parliament’s request for a cost-benefit analysis of a merger that highlights its possible advantages and disadvantages. It regretted that the Commission proposal excludes the examination of the accounts and the revenue and expenditure of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking by the Court of Auditors. It stressed that the Court of Auditors has been the exclusive auditor for Joint Undertakings set up under Article 187 TFEU since 2002 and therefore building up extensive knowledge over those bodies that should not be wasted.

Parliament also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

It also invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

JTI : Parliament invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. It noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. It also recalled that the total Union contribution deemed necessary for the Joint Undertakings for their period of existence amounts to EUR 11.5 million.

It recalled that it had previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

Lastly, Parliament agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

Documents
2014/04/03
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/04/02
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2014/03/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Paul RÜBIG (EPP, AT) in which it recommended the European Parliament to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.

Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the Undertaking for the financial year 2012 are reliable, and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approved the closure of the Joint Undertaking’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

Qualified opinion : Members were concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. They stressed that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively. Members noted that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits. They reiterated that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls. Budgetary and Financial Management : Members recalled that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States' NFAs amounted to EUR 7.3 million, which represents 43% of total operational payments. They are concerned that the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs. They also noted that the Joint Undertaking's initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55.1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39.5 million. They regretted the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62% and reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States. Implementation rate and carryovers : Members were concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking. They emphasised that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17.2 million, representing 57% of the authorised payment appropriations. They ascertained from the Court of Auditors' report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget.

Members also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

They also invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

JTI : Members invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Members noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings.

They recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

Members agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

Documents
2014/03/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2014/02/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2014/02/05
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Details

Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2012 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2012 of the Artemis Joint Undertaking, and the report by the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012.

The observations in the Court of Auditors' report in relation to the financial year 2012 call for some comments by the Council, which may be summarised as follows:

Qualified opinion : the Council regrets the Court's qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts, based on the Court's assessment that the Joint Undertaking's ex-post audit strategy does not provide sufficient assurance that this key control tool is functioning effectively . The Council urges the Joint Undertaking to examine the audit strategies of the National Funding Authorities (NFAs), to ensure that all NFAs deliver their audit reports on time, and that they include all relevant information for the ex-post audit strategy to function effectively. Excessive carry-overs : in order to avoid excessive carry-overs, the Council calls on the Joint Undertaking to pay due attention to the proper implementation of commitment and payment appropriations in the course of the budgetary year and to decommit unused appropriations if necessary, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality. Internal control systems : the Council recognises the improvements achieved in 2012 by the Joint Undertaking in its financial, accounting and management control procedures. However, further work is still necessary, in particular regarding the implementation of the internal control standards and the financial verification of cost claims. The Council takes note of the Joint Undertaking's response concerning the internal audit capability. With regard to the Court's remarks on the internal audit function, the Council invites the Joint Undertaking to bring its own Financial Rules concerning internal audit arrangements, and in particular regarding the powers of the Commission's internal auditor, in line with the revised Framework Financial Regulation. Research results : the Council furthermore invites the Joint Undertaking to improve the monitoring and reporting of research results, in line with the provision of the relevant regulations of the Seventh Framework Programmes, as well as the reporting of reservations in its annual activity report, in order to address the shortcomings identified in the ex-post audit strategy.

Documents
2014/01/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/10/22
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, together with the Joint Undertaking’s reply.

CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.

This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking.

In the Court’s opinion, the Artemis Joint Undertaking’s Annual Accounts fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.

The Court also considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year ended 31 December 2012 are, in all material respects, partially legal and regular . A qualified opinion was delivered.

The basis for this qualified opinion concerns the ex post audit strategy. The audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the the national funding authorities of the Member States (NFAs). Artemis received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs related to completed projects. However, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of these audits. Information on the audit strategies of all NFAs was insufficient. The Court was therefore not in a position to assess whether ex post audits provide sufficient assurance as to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.

The report confirms that the Artemis Joint Undertaking’s budget for 2012 amounted to EUR 57 446 787 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 27 217 532 in payment appropriations.

The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Joint Undertaking, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:

Court’s comments :

internal audit capacity: the Court stated that during 2012, the Joint Undertaking intensified its efforts to establish and implement effective financial, accounting and management control procedures. However, further work is needed, in particular regarding the internal control standards and the financial verification of cost claims.

Joint Undertaking’s replies :

qualified opinion : in its reply, Artemis acknowledges the importance of the ex post audit strategy. However, the various financing schemes and national rules in place in the different Member States imply that ex post audit is only feasible on completed projects . In that perspective a new modification of Artemis ex post audit strategy was submitted to the Governing Board on December and finally approved on January 2013.

As regards the activities of the Joint Undertaking in 2012 , the report refers to the Annual Activity Report 2012 which can be found at http://www.artemis-ju.eu/reference_documents .

On an operation level, the Court’s report states that the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent in 2012 EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget.

2013/10/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/10/10
   EP - RÜBIG Paul (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2013/07/26
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
2013/07/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published

Documents

Votes

A7-0203/2014 - Paul Rübig - Résolution #

2014/04/03 Outcome: +: 480, -: 64, 0: 18
DE FR IT ES RO SE PT HU BE PL NL BG SK AT HR LT DK FI EL IE EE LV SI CZ LU CY MT GB
Total
73
55
53
37
18
18
17
16
18
40
23
14
12
14
10
9
11
7
9
6
6
7
6
17
4
4
3
54
icon: PPE PPE
188

Belgium PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Greece PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2
2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
150

Netherlands S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
22

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Bulgaria EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
45

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
12 2013/2250(DEC)
2014/02/26 CONT 12 amendments...
source: PE-528.204

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2013-07-26T00:00:00
docs
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0
date
2013-07-25T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
events/0
date
2013-07-26T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-04-02-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/4
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.705
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-521705_EN.html
docs/2/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE528.204
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-528204_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2014-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0203_EN.html title: A7-0203/2014
summary
events/3
date
2014-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0203_EN.html title: A7-0203/2014
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0331_EN.html title: T7-0331/2014
summary
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0331_EN.html title: T7-0331/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: RÜBIG Paul date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RÜBIG Paul group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0203&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0203_EN.html
events/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0331 title: T7-0331/2014
summary
events/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24438&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0331 title: T7-0331/2014
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0331
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0331_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570 title: COM(2013)0570 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52013DC0570:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2014-03-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0203&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0203/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0331 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0331/2014 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RÜBIG Paul group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
docs
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2013:369:TOC title: OJ C 369 17.12.2013, p. 0001 title: N7-0005/2014 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, together with the Joint Undertaking’s reply. CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit. This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking. In the Court’s opinion, the Artemis Joint Undertaking’s Annual Accounts fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer. The Court also considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year ended 31 December 2012 are, in all material respects, partially legal and regular . A qualified opinion was delivered. The basis for this qualified opinion concerns the ex post audit strategy. The audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the the national funding authorities of the Member States (NFAs). Artemis received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs related to completed projects. However, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of these audits. Information on the audit strategies of all NFAs was insufficient. The Court was therefore not in a position to assess whether ex post audits provide sufficient assurance as to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The report confirms that the Artemis Joint Undertaking’s budget for 2012 amounted to EUR 57 446 787 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 27 217 532 in payment appropriations. The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Joint Undertaking, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows: Court’s comments : internal audit capacity: the Court stated that during 2012, the Joint Undertaking intensified its efforts to establish and implement effective financial, accounting and management control procedures. However, further work is needed, in particular regarding the internal control standards and the financial verification of cost claims. Joint Undertaking’s replies : qualified opinion : in its reply, Artemis acknowledges the importance of the ex post audit strategy. However, the various financing schemes and national rules in place in the different Member States imply that ex post audit is only feasible on completed projects . In that perspective a new modification of Artemis ex post audit strategy was submitted to the Governing Board on December and finally approved on January 2013. As regards the activities of the Joint Undertaking in 2012 , the report refers to the Annual Activity Report 2012 which can be found at http://www.artemis-ju.eu/reference_documents . On an operation level, the Court’s report states that the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent in 2012 EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2014-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.705 title: PE521.705 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2014-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5851%2F14&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05851/2014 summary: Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2012 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2012 of the Artemis Joint Undertaking, and the report by the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012. The observations in the Court of Auditors' report in relation to the financial year 2012 call for some comments by the Council, which may be summarised as follows: Qualified opinion : the Council regrets the Court's qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts, based on the Court's assessment that the Joint Undertaking's ex-post audit strategy does not provide sufficient assurance that this key control tool is functioning effectively . The Council urges the Joint Undertaking to examine the audit strategies of the National Funding Authorities (NFAs), to ensure that all NFAs deliver their audit reports on time, and that they include all relevant information for the ex-post audit strategy to function effectively. Excessive carry-overs : in order to avoid excessive carry-overs, the Council calls on the Joint Undertaking to pay due attention to the proper implementation of commitment and payment appropriations in the course of the budgetary year and to decommit unused appropriations if necessary, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality. Internal control systems : the Council recognises the improvements achieved in 2012 by the Joint Undertaking in its financial, accounting and management control procedures. However, further work is still necessary, in particular regarding the implementation of the internal control standards and the financial verification of cost claims. The Council takes note of the Joint Undertaking's response concerning the internal audit capability. With regard to the Court's remarks on the internal audit function, the Council invites the Joint Undertaking to bring its own Financial Rules concerning internal audit arrangements, and in particular regarding the powers of the Commission's internal auditor, in line with the revised Framework Financial Regulation. Research results : the Council furthermore invites the Joint Undertaking to improve the monitoring and reporting of research results, in line with the provision of the relevant regulations of the Seventh Framework Programmes, as well as the reporting of reservations in its annual activity report, in order to address the shortcomings identified in the ex-post audit strategy. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE528.204 title: PE528.204 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2013)0570 summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012, as part of the 2012 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking . CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the Artemis Joint Undertaking. In 2012, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows: description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking : the joint undertaking, which is located in Brussels, was set up in 2007 by Council Regulation 74/2008/EC for a period of 10 years. The main objective of the Joint Undertaking is to implement a 'Research Agenda' for the development of key technologies for Embedded Computing Systems across different application areas; budget of the Joint Undertaking for the 2012 financial year : the maximum indicative contribution of the Commission amounts to EUR 420 million paid out under the 7th Research Framework Programme for research and technological development until 2017. The cumulative unrecognised share of losses is EUR 5 million (95.2% ownership participation). Please also consult Artemis Joint Undertaking’s final accounts.
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0203&language=EN title: A7-0203/2014 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Paul RÜBIG (EPP, AT) in which it recommended the European Parliament to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the Undertaking for the financial year 2012 are reliable, and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approved the closure of the Joint Undertaking’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies. Qualified opinion : Members were concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. They stressed that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively. Members noted that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits. They reiterated that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls. Budgetary and Financial Management : Members recalled that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States' NFAs amounted to EUR 7.3 million, which represents 43% of total operational payments. They are concerned that the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs. They also noted that the Joint Undertaking's initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55.1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39.5 million. They regretted the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62% and reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States. Implementation rate and carryovers : Members were concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking. They emphasised that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17.2 million, representing 57% of the authorised payment appropriations. They ascertained from the Court of Auditors' report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget. Members also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls. They also invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure. JTI : Members invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Members noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. They recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Members agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0331 title: T7-0331/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012. The vote on the discharge decision approved the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, Parliament adopted by 480 votes to 64, with 18 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations that form an integral part of the discharge decision and as well as the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies. These recommendations are summarised as follows: Qualified opinion : Parliament was concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. It stressed that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively. Parliament noted that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits. It reiterated that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls. Budgetary and Financial Management : Parliament recalled that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States' NFAs amounted to EUR 7.3 million, which represents 43% of total operational payments. It is concerned that the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs. It also noted that the Joint Undertaking's initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55.1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39.5 million. It regretted the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62% and reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States. Implementation rate and carryovers : Parliament was concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking. It emphasised that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17.2 million, representing 57% of the authorised payment appropriations. It ascertained from the Court of Auditors' report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget. Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (ECSEL) Joint Undertaking : Parliament recalled the continued worries of the discharge authority concerning the low implementation rates of their budget and, moreover, the underlying activities of the Joint Undertakings associated with high cash balances. It recalled that it sought to increase and leverage private and public investments in research and innovation in two complementary domains of high importance for the industrial fabric in Europe. It noted that the Commission made a proposal , in the context of the implementation of Horizon 2020, to combine Embedded computing systems (Artemis) and Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) into a single initiative and therefore, winding-up ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings before their normal end of life up to 31 December 2017. It stated that the new Joint Undertaking in the field of electronic components and systems called ECSEL ('Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership') will take the form of a tripartite institutional Public-Private Partnership (PPP) with a dedicated legal entity. It recalled Parliament’s request for a cost-benefit analysis of a merger that highlights its possible advantages and disadvantages. It regretted that the Commission proposal excludes the examination of the accounts and the revenue and expenditure of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking by the Court of Auditors. It stressed that the Court of Auditors has been the exclusive auditor for Joint Undertakings set up under Article 187 TFEU since 2002 and therefore building up extensive knowledge over those bodies that should not be wasted. Parliament also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls. It also invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure. JTI : Parliament invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. It noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. It also recalled that the total Union contribution deemed necessary for the Joint Undertakings for their period of existence amounts to EUR 11.5 million. It recalled that it had previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes. Lastly, Parliament agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/621/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012. CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of its budget for the financial year 2012. This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014). Amongst the main observations made, Parliament made a number of cross-cutting comments as regards all the Joint Undertakings (JUs) and invited the Court of Auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the JUs in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks - notably reputational - presented. It stressed that such assessment has an urgent character as regards Artemis and ENIAC Joint Undertakings.
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/7/14236
New
  • CONT/7/14236
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0311
New
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0311
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.02 2012 discharge
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/6
date
2014-09-05T00:00:00
text

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/621/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of its budget for the financial year 2012.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014).

Amongst the main observations made, Parliament made a number of cross-cutting comments as regards all the Joint Undertakings (JUs) and invited the Court of Auditors to conduct a detailed analysis of the JUs in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks - notably reputational - presented. It stressed that such assessment has an urgent character as regards Artemis and ENIAC Joint Undertakings.

type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
title
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0311
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/2/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: RÜBIG Paul
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/2/committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/0/date
2013-10-10T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios
  • group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012. The vote on the discharge decision approved the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament.

    Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, Parliament adopted by 480 votes to 64, with 18 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations that form an integral part of the discharge decision and as well as the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

    These recommendations are summarised as follows:

    • Qualified opinion: Parliament was concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. It stressed that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively. Parliament noted that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits. It reiterated that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls.
    • Budgetary and Financial Management: Parliament recalled that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States' NFAs amounted to EUR 7.3 million, which represents 43% of total operational payments. It is concerned that the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs. It also noted that the Joint Undertaking's initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55.1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39.5 million. It regretted the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62% and reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States.
    • Implementation rate and carryovers: Parliament was concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking. It emphasised that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17.2 million, representing 57% of the authorised payment appropriations. It ascertained from the Court of Auditors' report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget.
    • Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (ECSEL) Joint Undertaking: Parliament recalled the continued worries of the discharge authority concerning the low implementation rates of their budget and, moreover, the underlying activities of the Joint Undertakings associated with high cash balances. It recalled that it sought to increase and leverage private and public investments in research and innovation in two complementary domains of high importance for the industrial fabric in Europe. It noted that the Commission  made a proposal, in the context of the implementation of Horizon 2020, to combine Embedded computing systems (Artemis) and Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) into a single initiative and therefore, winding-up ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings before their normal end of life up to 31 December 2017. It stated that the new Joint Undertaking in the field of electronic components and systems called ECSEL ('Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership') will take the form of a tripartite institutional Public-Private Partnership (PPP) with a dedicated legal entity. It recalled Parliament’s request for a cost-benefit analysis of a merger that highlights its possible advantages and disadvantages. It regretted that the Commission proposal excludes the examination of the accounts and the revenue and expenditure of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking by the Court of Auditors. It stressed that the Court of Auditors has been the exclusive auditor for Joint Undertakings set up under Article 187 TFEU since 2002 and therefore building up extensive knowledge over those bodies that should not be wasted.

    Parliament also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

    It also invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

    JTI: Parliament invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. It noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings. It also recalled that the total Union contribution deemed necessary for the Joint Undertakings for their period of existence amounts to EUR 11.5 million.

    It recalled that it had previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

    Lastly, Parliament agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0331
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
docs
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0331/2014
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities/4/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Paul RÜBIG (EPP, AT) in which it recommended the European Parliament to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Artemis Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2012.

    Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the Undertaking for the financial year 2012 are reliable, and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approved the closure of the Joint Undertaking’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

    • Qualified opinion: Members were concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. They stressed that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively. Members noted that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits. They reiterated that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls.
    • Budgetary and Financial Management: Members recalled that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States' NFAs amounted to EUR 7.3 million, which represents 43% of total operational payments. They are concerned that the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45% of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs. They also noted that the Joint Undertaking's initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55.1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39.5 million. They regretted the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62% and reminded the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States.
    • Implementation rate and carryovers: Members were concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking. They emphasised that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17.2 million, representing 57% of the authorised payment appropriations. They ascertained from the Court of Auditors' report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50.2% of the total budget.

    Members also made a series of observations on transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures as well as comments on internal controls.

    They also invited the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking's policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure.

    JTI: Members invited the Court of Auditors to comprehensively analyse the JTIs and the other joint undertakings in a separate report in light of the substantial amounts involved and the risks notably reputational – presented. Members noted that the Joint Undertakings’ total 2012 forecasted budgeted income amounted to some EUR 2.5 billion or about 1.8% of the Union general budget for the financial year 2012, while approximately EUR 618 million came from the general budget (cash contribution from the European Commission) and approximately EUR 134 million came from the industrial partners and members of the Joint Undertakings.

    They recalled that Parliament has previously requested that the Court of Auditors draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

    Members agreed with the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the JTIs have been set up to support long-term industrial investment, in particular research areas but noted that it has taken on average two years to grant financial autonomy to a JTI, with the Commission usually remaining responsible for one third of the expected operational lifetime of the JTIs.

activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
New
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/3
date
2014-03-20T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0203&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0203/2014
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2014-03-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
ANDREASEN Marta
committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
ANDREASEN Marta
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1
date
2013-10-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/14236
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012, as part of the 2012 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the Artemis Joint Undertaking.

    CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the Artemis Joint Undertaking.

    In 2012, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows:

    • description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking: the joint undertaking, which is located in Brussels, was set up in 2007 by Council Regulation 74/2008/EC for a period of 10 years. The main objective of the Joint Undertaking is to implement a 'Research Agenda' for the development of key technologies for Embedded Computing Systems across different application areas;
    • budget of the Joint Undertaking for the 2012 financial year: the maximum indicative contribution of the Commission amounts to EUR 420 million paid out under the 7th Research Framework Programme for research and technological development until 2017. The cumulative unrecognised share of losses is EUR 5 million (95.2% ownership participation).

    Please also consult Artemis Joint Undertaking’s final accounts.

activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 docs: celexid: CELEX:52013DC0570:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2013)0570 type: Non-legislative basic document body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: STAVRAKAKIS Georgios group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subject
8.70.03.02 2012 discharge
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
reference
2013/2250(DEC)
title
2012 discharge: Artemis Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems