Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | NEYNSKY Nadezhda (EPP) | |
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | REGI |
Activites
-
2013/12/10
Vote in plenary scheduled
- #3276
-
2013/12/03
Council Meeting
-
2013/11/28
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
-
A7-0408/2013
summary
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Nadezhda NEYNSKY (EPP, BG) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund of an amount of EUR 2 305 357 in commitment and payment appropriations to assist Germany in respect of redundancies in the solar module production sector. Members recalled that the European Union set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. Given that Germany submitted application EGF/2013/003 DE/First Solar for a financial contribution from the EGF, following 959 redundancies in the enterprise First Solar Manufacturing GmbH with 875 workers targeted for EFG co-funded measures, during the reference period from 15 November 2012 to 15 March 2013, Members called on the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF for the requested amount, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation have been met. Therefore, Germany is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation. They considered that the redundancies in First Solar Manufacturing GmbH involved in solar energy production are linked to major structural changes in world trade patterns, referring to the building up of huge overcapacities in solar modules in China coupled with worldwide decline in demand. These redundancies lead to an immediate increase of the rate of unemployment by 4%, while the area concerned (Land of Brandenburg) is already suffering from an above-average rate of unemployment. Moreover, Members welcome the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the German authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 January 2013, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package. Targeted measures: Members noted that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 875 redundant workers into employment such as training courses leading to qualifications, training management, workshops and peer groups, support services and international job search, in-depth business creation advice, job search, activation grant, etc. They noted that more than half of the EGF support will be spent on allowances - 875 workers are said to receive during their active participation in the measures a subsistence allowance (estimated cost EUR 2 714 per worker over 9 months). Members recalled that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances. Assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors. Improving the future EGF: Members requested the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF. They appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF. They stressed that in this context that the new EGF regulation for 2014-2020 period will introduce a cap on financial allowances, which shall not constitute more than 35% of the cost of the package. They hoped that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new EGF Regulation for 2014-2020 and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved. Members welcomed the agreement reached in the Council on reintroducing in the EGF Regulation, for the period 2014-2020, the crisis mobilisation criterion, which allows for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current financial and economic crisis in addition to those losing their job because of changes in global trade patterns. In the process, Members reiterated their classic position when dealing with this type of request, notably to ensure that the EGF supports the reintegration of individual redundant workers into stable employment.
-
A7-0408/2013
summary
-
2013/11/27
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2013/11/15 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2013/10/25 Committee draft report
-
2013/10/22
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2013/10/16
Non-legislative basic document
-
COM(2013)0706
summary
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the solar module producing in Germany. PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework. The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by Germany to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows: Germany: EGF/2013/003 DE/First Solar: On 12 April 2013, Germany submitted application EGF/2013/003 DE/First Solar for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in First Solar Manufacturing GmbH in Germany. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 14 August 2013. In order to establish the link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, Germany states that First Solar, a US company with two sites in Frankfurt (Oder) in Germany, decided in 2011 to close the plants due to the lack of economic viability. The plants closed in 2013, with the redundancies spread over the period between 1 January and 1 June. First Solar Manufacturing GmbH is only one of many European solar enterprises that have become insolvent. Chinese and Taiwanese companies were able to grow revenue faster than German and US companies. Between 2005 and 2011, the revenue share of China increased from 11 % to 45 %, while that of Germany fell from 64 % to 21%. China has built up huge overcapacities in solar modules, which neither its own consumers nor the world market can absorb; this coupled with the worldwide decline in demand has led to a collapse in prices. Germany submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers. The application cites 959 redundancies in First Solar Manufacturing GmbH from 15 November 2012 to 15 March 2013. On the basis of the application from Denmark, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services is EUR 2 305 357, representing 50% of the total cost. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount referred to above, to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework. The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25% of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year. By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trilogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trilogue meeting will be convened. The Commission presents separately a transfer request in order to enter in the 2013 budget specific commitment appropriations, as required in Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006. Appropriations from the EGF budget line will be used to cover the amount needed for the present application.
-
COM(2013)0706
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2013)0706
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE523.112
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0408/2013
- Committee draft report: PE521.773
Amendments | Dossier |
6 |
2013/2263(BUD)
2013/11/15
BUDG
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the concerned redundancies are part of a broad restructuring plan which cut the global work force of First Solar Manufacturing GmbH by 30% to sharply reduce its global production capacity and resulted in closing both sites located in Germany; stresses the added value of EGF to react to redundancies caused by unexpected market changes linked to globalisation;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the German authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 January 2013, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package; notes that redundant workers have also benefitted from the ESF support before participating in the EGF measures; welcomes the fact that the German authorities confirmed that necessary precautions have been taken to avoid double financing from Union funds;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that more than half of the EGF support will be spent on allowances - 875 workers are said to receive during their active participation in the measures a subsistence allowance (estimated cost EUR 2 714 per worker over 9 months); further notes that the application includes a lump sum of EUR 1 869 activation premium for 200 workers who quickly find a job without further assistance after the conclusion of the measures;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Recalls that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; if included in the package they should be of complementary nature and never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements; stresses in this context that the new EGF regulation for 2014-2020 will limit the inclusion of financial allowances in the package to a maximum of 35% of the cost of the measures and that accordingly the rate of allowances within the coordinated package for this demand will not repeat under this new regulation;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the fact that the social partners
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 source: PE-523.112
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Budgetary text adopted by Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0408&language=EN
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.112
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/3 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.773
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/7/14320
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0706:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|