Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement.
Members recalled that trade between the EU and China has been growing rapidly and continuously in the last three decades, reaching a peak of total trade of EUR 433.8 billion in 2012. They also note that the imbalance in bilateral trade has been in China's favour since 1997 and that this trade deficit amounted to EUR 146 billion in 2012.
Parliament goes on to recall also that the EU's foreign investment stock in China in 2011 amounted to EUR 102 billion, while China's foreign investment stock in the EU in the same year amounted to EUR 15 billion. Furthermore, 26 Member States have individual bilateral investment agreements in force with China and this investment agreement is the first to be negotiated by the EU on the basis of its overall competence following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
In this context, the resolution considered that the investment agreement with China should be based on best practices drawn from Member States' experiences, contribute to greater coherence and include the following standards:
· non-discrimination (national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment for investors and investments in like circumstances);
· prohibition of manifest arbitrariness in decision-making;
· prohibition of the denial of justice and disregard for the fundamental principles of due process;
· the obligation not to deny justice in criminal, civil, or administrative adjudicatory proceedings, in accordance with the principle of due process embodied in the world's principal legal systems;
· prohibition of abusive treatment of investors, including coercion, duress and harassment;
· protection against direct and indirect expropriation, and allowing for adequate compensation for any damage incurred in the event of expropriation;
· respect for the principle of legality in connection with nationalisations.
In general terms, Members called for the agreement currently being negotiated to cover both market access and investor protection.
IPR: Members pointed out that currently, the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures, which were often associated with the transfer of strategic technologies that promoted China's competitive development to the detriment of European industry. Parliament was convinced that further openness on the part of China towards other legal regulations allowing foreign investors to set up, combined with due protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs), industrial property, brands and geographical indications of products, was crucial and would be mutually beneficial. It welcomed the efforts made by the Chinese authorities to improve respect for IPRs since China's accession to the WTO, but still deplored their inadequate protection in China and considered regrettable the lack of specific means available to European businesses, particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively.
Fundamental rights and labour rights : lastly, Members stressed that investment agreements concluded by the EU must not be in contradiction with the fundamental values that the EU wishes to promote through its external policies and must not undermine the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social and environmental criteria, human rights, the fight against counterfeiting, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity. In order to achieve this, Parliament called for the inclusion of the respective specific and binding clauses in the agreement. It also reiterated its call for an effective corporate social responsibility clause in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)61
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0411/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Motion for a resolution: B7-0439/2013
- Motion for a resolution: B7-0436/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.721
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.721
- Motion for a resolution: B7-0436/2013
- Motion for a resolution: B7-0439/2013
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)61
Activities
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Sir Graham WATSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Victor BOŞTINARU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christofer FJELLNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabeth KÖSTINGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vital MOREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cristiana MUSCARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ria OOMEN-RUIJTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Niccolò RINALDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matteo SALVINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marietje SCHAAKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adrian SEVERIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
118 |
2013/2674(RSP)
2013/08/23
INTA
118 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy of 25 June 2012,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas 26 EU Member States have individual bilateral investment agreements in force with China; whereas the EU has not yet developed a long-term and sustainable industrial policy driving its offensive and defensive interests in the framework of the new EU foreign investment policy,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Expresses its deep concern regarding the level of discretion of international arbitrators to make a broad interpretation of investor protection clauses, thereby leading to the ruling out of legitimate public regulations; demands that the arbitrators appointed by the parties when in dispute be independent and impartial and that the arbitration provided follow a code of conduct based either on the rules adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) or on those of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), or on any other international agreements and standards recognised and agreed to by the parties;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers as a key priority to include in the scope of the EU-China bilateral investment agreement effective state-to- state and investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanisms to prevent, on the one hand, that frivolous claims lead to unjustified arbitrations, and to ensure, on the other hand, that all investors have access to a fair trial, followed by enforcement of all arbitration awards without delay;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers as a key priority to include in the scope of the EU-China bilateral investment agreement effective state-to- state and investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanisms to prevent, on the one hand, that frivolous claims lead to unjustified arbitrations, and to ensure, on the other hand, that all investors have access to a fair trial, followed by enforcement of all arbitration awards without delay;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Calls on the EU and China to jointly establish an early warning mechanism in order to give themselves a chance to pro- actively solve any arising dispute on trade or investment at the earliest possible stage using all appropriate measures, including soft power and trade diplomacy;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Considers also that the EU-China bilateral investment agreement shall include provisions for out-of-court dispute settlement to foster swift, affordable and amicable dispute resolution between parties that freely decide to have recourse to it;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. Whereas even if the labour costs have been increasing by 10% per year in the past years, China is still among the top three markets worldwide to invest;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes the view that the agreement
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes the view that the agreement should provide
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes the view that the agreement should provide for state-to-state dispute settlement procedures
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes the view that the agreement should provide for state-to-state dispute settlement procedures, but no
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Suggests that precise definitions of flexible dispute-settlement mechanisms such as mediation be provided in the agreement as concerns, for example, the duration, cost and implementation of the solutions agreed by the parties;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Expresses its view that once concluded and fully ratified, an EU-China investment agreement would
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Recommends that negotiations only be opened on condition that formal approval has first been given by China’s State Council for market access to be included in the investment agreement;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Invites the Council to not approve negotiating directives for an investment agreement with China until the Commission has presented a template of investment agreement that can be agreed by the Council and the Parliament and which will then constitute a model for all investment agreements to be negotiated in the future;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the development goals expressed in the 12th 5-year plan and the EU2020 strategy provide for a high number of shared interests and common challenges; whereas a higher level of integration and technological exchange between the European and Chinese economies can lead to synergies and mutual benefits;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas there should be a level playing field for public and private companies;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the negotiation of this investment agreement
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas investors must respect both the laws of the host country
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the poor or non- implementation by China of some fundamental social and labour rights as well as of environmental standards, which are however internationally recognised, are among the causes of the present disequilibrium in trade flows between EU and China, which could even be further exacerbated by deeper investment relations if progress is not achieved in the implementation of those rights and standards; whereas this investment agreement should therefore not have the effect of further lowering social and environmental standards in China, but should, on the contrary, contribute to the improvement thereof as a pre-condition, leading to a more balanced and mutually- beneficial trade and investment relation;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas an investment agreement should also include investor obligations, in particular with regard to respecting trade union and other labour rights, transparency and the protection of the environment; whereas investment agreements should not cover investments in specially created zones that provide for circumventing labour and other law requirements;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas an investment agreement should also include investor obligations, in
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 14 March 2013 on EU-China relations2, __________________ 2 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0097
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas the Commission and the Council have committed to ensure that EU investment policy takes into account the principles and objectives of the Union's external action, including human rights, and have committed to deliver as from 2013;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. whereas the Commission's Impact Assessment on an EU-China investment agreement has not included a human rights dimension;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H c (new) Hc. whereas, since an investment agreement with China would substantially upgrade EU-China economic relations, it should also give a contribution to upgrading EU-China political dialogue, notably on such issues as human rights - in the framework of an effective and result-oriented human-rights dialogue - and the rule of law, with a view to keeping political and economic relations on a parallel track, consistently with the spirit of the Strategic Partnership;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas investors and investments shall strive, through their management policies and practices, to
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas it is clear that decisions of arbitral tribunals under existing investment protection agreements have frequently ignored the host state's obligations under international treaties concerning human rights, labour rights and the protection of the environment and have forced host states to pay compensation for acts which seek to implement these obligations but which also have the incidental effect of reducing foreign investors' profits;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the strengthening of economic relations between the European Union and China; calls on the EU and on China to pursue a relationship of partnership, regular high-level dialogue, and mutual benefits rather than engage in
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the strengthening of economic relations between the European Union and China; calls on the EU and on China to pursue a relationship of partnership and mutual benefits rather than engage in
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the strengthening of economic relations between the European Union and China; calls on the EU and on China to pursue a balanced relationship of partnership and mutual benefits rather than engage in fierce competition and confrontation;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that China, having acceded to the WTO in 2001, should show more emphasis towards liberalizing its trade and opening its market in order to ensure a more level playing field and accelerate the artificial impediments that companies face in accessing Chinese market;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the inclusion of market access in the negotiations mandate; believes that the reassurance from China to include market access in the negotiations should constitute a precondition for launching the negotiations;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 23 May 2012 on ‘EU and China: Unbalanced Trade?’,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses the need to explicitly include both FDIs and portfolio investments into the negotiating process;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that Chinese enterprises perceive the Union generally as a stable investment environment, but also deplore the existence of certain trade barriers to the European market, such as technical obstacles to trade and barriers erected to block third country investments in certain Member States; calls in this regard on the Union to eliminate all unjustified non-tariff barriers to trade and investment in the EU by foreign parties, but points out that Member States may have legitimate security concerns that justify total or partial exclusion of some sectors from foreign investment on a temporary or long-term basis;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that Chinese enterprises perceive the Union generally as a stable investment environment, but
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that Chinese enterprises perceive the Union generally as a stable investment environment, but
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that Chinese enterprises perceive the Union generally as a stable investment environment, but deplore the EU's significant export subsidies for European agricultural products, the existence of certain trade barriers to the European market, such as technical obstacles to trade and barriers erected to block third country investments in certain Member States;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures which has so far favoured the competitive development of China while weakening the competitiveness of the EU industry and incentivised the export of polluting technologies to China; is convinced that further openness by China on the joint venture mechanism, combined with better protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), would be mutually beneficial, and would favour a greater level of integration of the European and Chinese economies
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures; is convinced that further openness by China on the joint venture mechanism, combined
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that currently the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures; is convinced that further openness by China
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures; is convinced that further openness by China on the joint venture mechanism, combined
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 b (new) - having regard to the generally accepted principles and practices (GAPP) known as the ‘Santiago Principles’ , which were adopted in October 2008 by the IMF’s Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Is convinced that better protection of intellectual property rights and effective implementation of related rules in China would greatly promote the EU's and other foreign investors' objective of investing, sharing new technological capabilities and updating existing technologies in that country, in particular with regard to environmentally sound technologies;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the efforts made by the Chinese authorities to improve respect for intellectual property rights since China’s accession to the WTO, but still deplores their inadequate protection in China, and regrets the lack of specific means available to European businesses, and particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Is concerned by the unreliability of China’s judicial system, which fails to enforce contractual obligations, and by the lack of transparency and uniformity in applying the regulatory regime governing investments;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Is convinced that better protection of intellectual property rights and effective implementation of related rules in China would greatly promote the EU’s and other foreign investors’ objective of investing, sharing new technological capabilities and updating existing technologies in that country;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to negotiate an ambitious and balanced EU-China investment agreement that seeks to create a better environment and better market access for EU investors in China and vice versa, in
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to negotiate an ambitious and balanced EU-China investment agreement that seeks to create better environment for EU investors in China and vice versa, including improved access to the market, and to guarantee transparency regarding governance of Chinese companies both state owned and private ones which invest within the EU whilst increasing the level of reciprocal capital flows; insists also on better law enforcement in order to ensure fair competition between public and private actors, curtail corruption and enhance legal certainty and predictability of the business climate in China;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the importance of establishing, through this agreement, the pre-conditions for fair competition to take place between EU and China; to this purpose, recommends that the Commission negotiates strong and binding provisions on transparency and fair competition so that a level-playing field also applies to state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds' investment practices;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the agreement currently being negotiated to cover both market access and investor protection;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that nothing in an investment agreement shall reduce the policy space of the Parties and their capability to legislate in order to pursue public policy purposes; Stresses that guaranteeing the rule of law for all EU and Chinese investors and citizens, without prejudice to the right of the parties to adopt and enforce measures necessary to pursue legitimate public policy interests, must remain the priority;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that guaranteeing the rule of law for all EU and Chinese investors and citizens, without prejudice to the right of the parties to adopt and enforce measures necessary to pursue legitimate public policy interests, provided that such measures do not nullify the benefits accruing from the commitments of the parties, must remain the priority;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to its resolution entitled 'EU and China: Unbalanced Trade?' (2010/2301(INI));
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that guaranteeing the rule of law
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency on sovereign wealth funds;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that a clear timeframe of negotiations should to be established, and reasonable and meaningful transitional periods should be considered;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – introductory part Considers that the investment agreement with China should be based on the best practices drawn from Member State experiences, bring more coherence and include the following standards:
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reaffirms that in view of the successful conclusion of the negotiations, quality must always prevail over speed;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that the investment protection agreement should include clear definitions of the investment and investor to be protected and that speculative forms of investment should not be protected;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls for a compatibility of this agreement with multilateral obligations under GATS so as to fulfil the criteria of the Economic Integration agreement;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – indent 1 – non-discrimination (national treatment and most favoured nation treatment for investors and investments in like circumstances);
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – indent 2 Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – indent 7 – protection against direct and indirect expropriation, and allowing for adequate compensation in accordance with the damages occurred in the event of expropriation;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – indent 7 a (new) - a clear definition of fair and equitable treatment;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – indent 7 a (new) - respect for the principle of legality in connection with nationalisations;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the expected improvement in certainty will help SMEs to invest abroad, and notes in this regard that the voice of SMEs must be heard during negotiations; the involvement of EU's new SME Centre in China, the EU's IPR SME Helpdesk and the EU Chamber of Commerce in China is welcomed and their activity needs to be further developed;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that a precondition for the conclusion of the agreement should
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for a clause in the agreement, that makes clear that investments are subject to the laws and regulations of the host state;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that investment agreements
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that investment agreements concluded by the EU must respect the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social, environmental, human rights, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity; calls to include respective specific clauses into this agreement provided that such measures do not nullify the benefits accruing from the commitments of the parties;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that investment agreements concluded by the EU must
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that investment agreements concluded by the EU must respect the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social, environmental, human rights, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 b (new) - having regard to the common decision of EU and China, taken at the 14th EU- China Summit held in February 2012 in Beijing, to launch negotiations on a bilateral investment agreement;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Requests that in this agreement, as in the case of the other trade commitments into which the EU has entered, protecting public services should remain a key principle;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines that the future development of EU-China investment agreement shall be based on mutual trust and in full respect of WTO obligations. Deplores the huge levels of public subsidization of certain growth potential sectors, including solar panels, and calls on the Commission to ensure that the injurious effect of such dumping and subsidization shall be completely removed to speed the negotiations.
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends that with regard to market access, both
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends that with regard to market access, both parties may exclude certain sectors from the liberalisation commitments; recalls however that the EU has not yet developed a fully-fledged industrial policy and reminds that a first step in that direction would be the setting up of a body tasked with the supervision of foreign investment in strategic sectors similar to CFIUS in the US;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends that with regard to market access, both parties may exclude certain sectors from the liberalisation commitments; the agreement shall not include commitments covering audiovisual services and public utilities;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends that with regard to market access, both parties may exclude certain sectors from the liberalisation commitments; demands, in this respect, that the public services and cultural and audiovisual services sectors be excluded from the negotiations on market access, in line with the provisions on these policies set out in the EU treaties;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that, since it is difficult to access Chinese markets owing to the preponderance of state-run companies, the agreement must, if it is to be balanced, be viewed as a key opportunity to establish a level playing field for both state-run and private-sector companies;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses the need to ensure in the agreement the EU's capability to exclude certain strategic sectors from Chinese investors;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that nothing in the agreement shall prevent the Parties from defining and implementing policies for the promotion and protection of cultural diversity, including taking only reciprocal commitments in the cultural services sector and audiovisual services subsector, while negotiating relevant carve-outs for sensitive cultural and audiovisual products;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas trade between EU and China has been growing rapidly and continuously in the last three decades, reaching a peak amount of total trade of EUR 433,8 billion in 2012, and whereas the imbalance in bilateral trade has been in China's favour since 1997; whereas this trade deficit amounted to EUR 146,0 billion in 2012 compared to EUR 49 billion in 2000;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that nothing in the agreement shall prevent the Parties and, in the EU’s case, its individual Member States, from defining and implementing policies for the promotion and protection of cultural diversity;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that the agreement must promote investment which is sustainable, inclusive, and respects the environment, particularly in the area of extractive industries, and encourages good quality working conditions in the enterprises targeted by the investment;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls for a clause that an investor shall provide
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses the need for the future agreement to include provisions on the transparency and governance of state-run companies and sovereign wealth funds, based on the Santiago Principles, which were adopted under the auspices of the IMF and define the principles applicable to the governance and institutional structure of sovereign wealth funds and to the transparency of their investment strategy;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates its call for a binding corporate social responsibility clause
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates its call for a binding corporate social responsibility clause and effective social and environmental clauses; Investors should apply the ILO Tripartite Declaration on Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, as well as specific or sectoral standards of responsible practice where these exist;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates its call for a
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses that the agreement shall oblige Chinese investors in the EU to obey to European social standards and social dialogue;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas foreign investment stock of the EU in China in 2011 amounted to EUR 102 billion and foreign investment stock of China in the EU in the same year amounted to EUR 15 billion; whereas foreign investment stock from China in the EU amounted to EUR 3.5 billion only in 2006;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Underlines the need for the EU- China bilateral investment agreement to deliver on both sustainable growth and job creation, and to foster synergies and positive spill-over effects with other regional trade and investment agreements to which the EU or China are party; stresses in this regard the window of opportunity which the EU-China bilateral investment agreement represents with respect to the prospects of triangular economic integration between China, Taiwan, and the EU in the longer term;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to complement its impact assessment by also assessing the impact of the EU-China investment agreement on human rights, as it has committed to do under the Strategic Framework and Action plan on Human Rights and Democracy;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Reminds and stresses the need for all investors to fully comply with the law of the host Party at the local, regional, national and where applicable supranational level and warns investors that failure to respect the rule of law shall be subject to civil actions for liability in the judicial process of the relevant jurisdiction for any unlawful acts or decisions made in relation to the investment, including cases where such acts or decisions lead to significant environmental damage, personal injuries or loss of life;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Insists that the EU-China bilateral investment agreement must comply with the EU acquis, including social and environmental legislation in force, and that neither Party shall fail to effectively enforce its legislation in these areas, so that all provisions of this agreement encourage lawful establishment, acquisition, expansion, or retention of an investment in the respective territory of both Parties, and foster best entrepreneurial practices and business fair play;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Insists on the need to request in the agreement the compliance of foreign investors with EU data protection standards;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Requests to include an 'international obligation clause' in the agreement, which provides that obligations regarding the protection of investors must be read subject to all parties' obligations under international treaties and customary international law, in particular concerning human rights, labour rights and the protection of the environment; requests therefore that an investment agreement should not curtail progress in ratifying and fully implementing international human rights, ILO Conventions and multilateral environmental agreements by both Parties;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises that the mandate shall not include any self-deleting language constructions, which nullify the intention of other paragraphs;
source: PE-516.721
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.721New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-516721_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0436_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0436_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0439_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0439_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131008&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-08-TOC_EN.html |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
committees/0/date |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-436&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0436_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-439&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0439_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0411_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
INTA/7/12967New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Resolution on statementsNew
Resolution on statement |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-08-23T00:00:00New
2013-10-09T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/title |
Old
PE516.721New
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/1/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.721New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23500&l=en |
activities/1/docs/1 |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/2 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/title |
Old
EU - China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreementNew
Resolution on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement |
activities/1/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|