BETA


2013/2674(RSP) Resolution on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2014/03/06
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/10/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/10/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement.

Members recalled that trade between the EU and China has been growing rapidly and continuously in the last three decades, reaching a peak of total trade of EUR 433.8 billion in 2012. They also note that the imbalance in bilateral trade has been in China's favour since 1997 and that this trade deficit amounted to EUR 146 billion in 2012.

Parliament goes on to recall also that the EU's foreign investment stock in China in 2011 amounted to EUR 102 billion, while China's foreign investment stock in the EU in the same year amounted to EUR 15 billion. Furthermore, 26 Member States have individual bilateral investment agreements in force with China and this investment agreement is the first to be negotiated by the EU on the basis of its overall competence following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.

In this context, the resolution considered that the investment agreement with China should be based on best practices drawn from Member States' experiences, contribute to greater coherence and include the following standards:

· non-discrimination (national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment for investors and investments in like circumstances);

· prohibition of manifest arbitrariness in decision-making;

· prohibition of the denial of justice and disregard for the fundamental principles of due process;

· the obligation not to deny justice in criminal, civil, or administrative adjudicatory proceedings, in accordance with the principle of due process embodied in the world's principal legal systems;

· prohibition of abusive treatment of investors, including coercion, duress and harassment;

· protection against direct and indirect expropriation, and allowing for adequate compensation for any damage incurred in the event of expropriation;

· respect for the principle of legality in connection with nationalisations.

In general terms, Members called for the agreement currently being negotiated to cover both market access and investor protection.

IPR: Members pointed out that currently, the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures, which were often associated with the transfer of strategic technologies that promoted China's competitive development to the detriment of European industry. Parliament was convinced that further openness on the part of China towards other legal regulations allowing foreign investors to set up, combined with due protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs), industrial property, brands and geographical indications of products, was crucial and would be mutually beneficial. It welcomed the efforts made by the Chinese authorities to improve respect for IPRs since China's accession to the WTO, but still deplored their inadequate protection in China and considered regrettable the lack of specific means available to European businesses, particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively.

Fundamental rights and labour rights : lastly, Members stressed that investment agreements concluded by the EU must not be in contradiction with the fundamental values that the EU wishes to promote through its external policies and must not undermine the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social and environmental criteria, human rights, the fight against counterfeiting, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity. In order to achieve this, Parliament called for the inclusion of the respective specific and binding clauses in the agreement. It also reiterated its call for an effective corporate social responsibility clause in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

Documents
2013/10/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/10/08
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/10/02
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2013/10/01
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2013/08/23
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
118 2013/2674(RSP)
2013/08/23 INTA 118 amendments...
source: PE-516.721

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.721
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-516721_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0436_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0436_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0439_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0439_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131008&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-08-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2013-10-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0411_EN.html title: T7-0411/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-10-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0411_EN.html title: T7-0411/2013
summary
committees/0/date
    docs/1/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-436&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0436_EN.html
    docs/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-439&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0439_EN.html
    docs/3/body
    EC
    events/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0411_EN.html
    activities
    • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131008&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2013-10-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23500&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0411/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    committee_full
    International Trade
    committee
    INTA
    associated
    False
    date
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee_full
    International Trade
    committee
    INTA
    docs
    • date: 2013-08-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.721 title: PE516.721 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
    • date: 2013-10-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-436&language=EN title: B7-0436/2013 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2013-10-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-439&language=EN title: B7-0439/2013 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2014-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23500&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)61 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131008&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2013-10-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23500&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2013-10-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411 title: T7-0411/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement. Members recalled that trade between the EU and China has been growing rapidly and continuously in the last three decades, reaching a peak of total trade of EUR 433.8 billion in 2012. They also note that the imbalance in bilateral trade has been in China's favour since 1997 and that this trade deficit amounted to EUR 146 billion in 2012. Parliament goes on to recall also that the EU's foreign investment stock in China in 2011 amounted to EUR 102 billion, while China's foreign investment stock in the EU in the same year amounted to EUR 15 billion. Furthermore, 26 Member States have individual bilateral investment agreements in force with China and this investment agreement is the first to be negotiated by the EU on the basis of its overall competence following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. In this context, the resolution considered that the investment agreement with China should be based on best practices drawn from Member States' experiences, contribute to greater coherence and include the following standards: · non-discrimination (national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment for investors and investments in like circumstances); · prohibition of manifest arbitrariness in decision-making; · prohibition of the denial of justice and disregard for the fundamental principles of due process; · the obligation not to deny justice in criminal, civil, or administrative adjudicatory proceedings, in accordance with the principle of due process embodied in the world's principal legal systems; · prohibition of abusive treatment of investors, including coercion, duress and harassment; · protection against direct and indirect expropriation, and allowing for adequate compensation for any damage incurred in the event of expropriation; · respect for the principle of legality in connection with nationalisations. In general terms, Members called for the agreement currently being negotiated to cover both market access and investor protection. IPR: Members pointed out that currently, the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures, which were often associated with the transfer of strategic technologies that promoted China's competitive development to the detriment of European industry. Parliament was convinced that further openness on the part of China towards other legal regulations allowing foreign investors to set up, combined with due protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs), industrial property, brands and geographical indications of products, was crucial and would be mutually beneficial. It welcomed the efforts made by the Chinese authorities to improve respect for IPRs since China's accession to the WTO, but still deplored their inadequate protection in China and considered regrettable the lack of specific means available to European businesses, particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively. Fundamental rights and labour rights : lastly, Members stressed that investment agreements concluded by the EU must not be in contradiction with the fundamental values that the EU wishes to promote through its external policies and must not undermine the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social and environmental criteria, human rights, the fight against counterfeiting, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity. In order to achieve this, Parliament called for the inclusion of the respective specific and binding clauses in the agreement. It also reiterated its call for an effective corporate social responsibility clause in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
    • date: 2013-10-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    INTA/7/12967
    New
    • INTA/7/12967
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    • 6.20.06 Foreign direct investment (FDI)
    New
    6.20.03
    Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    6.20.06
    Foreign direct investment (FDI)
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Resolution on statements
    New
    Resolution on statement
    activities/1
    date
    2013-10-01T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-436&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0436/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Motion for a resolution
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2013-08-23T00:00:00
    New
    2013-10-09T00:00:00
    activities/1/docs/0/title
    Old
    PE516.721
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/1/docs/0/type
    Old
    Amendments tabled in committee
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/1/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.721
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23500&l=en
    activities/1/docs/1
    url
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411
    text

    The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on International Trade on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement.

    Members recalled that trade between the EU and China has been growing rapidly and continuously in the last three decades, reaching a peak of total trade of EUR 433.8 billion in 2012. They also note that the imbalance in bilateral trade has been in China's favour since 1997 and that this trade deficit amounted to EUR 146 billion in 2012.

    Parliament goes on to recall also that the EU's foreign investment stock in China in 2011 amounted to EUR 102 billion, while China's foreign investment stock in the EU in the same year amounted to EUR 15 billion. Furthermore, 26 Member States have individual bilateral investment agreements in force with China and this investment agreement is the first to be negotiated by the EU on the basis of its overall competence following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.

    In this context, the resolution considered that the investment agreement with China should be based on best practices drawn from Member States' experiences, contribute to greater coherence and include the following standards:

    ·        non-discrimination (national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment for investors and investments in like circumstances);

    ·        prohibition of manifest arbitrariness in decision-making;

    ·        prohibition of the denial of justice and disregard for the fundamental principles of due process;

    ·        the obligation not to deny justice in criminal, civil, or administrative adjudicatory proceedings, in accordance with the principle of due process embodied in the world's principal legal systems;

    ·        prohibition of abusive treatment of investors, including coercion, duress and harassment;

    ·        protection against direct and indirect expropriation, and allowing for adequate compensation for any damage incurred in the event of expropriation;

    ·        respect for the principle of legality in connection with nationalisations.

    In general terms, Members called for the agreement currently being negotiated to cover both market access and investor protection.

    IPR: Members pointed out that currently, the main form in which foreign companies are allowed to set up in China is through joint ventures, which were often associated with the transfer of strategic technologies that promoted China's competitive development to the detriment of European industry. Parliament was convinced that further openness on the part of China towards other legal regulations allowing foreign investors to set up, combined with due protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs), industrial property, brands and geographical indications of products, was crucial and would be mutually beneficial. It welcomed the efforts made by the Chinese authorities to improve respect for IPRs since China's accession to the WTO, but still deplored their inadequate protection in China and considered regrettable the lack of specific means available to European businesses, particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively.

    Fundamental rights and labour rights: lastly, Members stressed that investment agreements concluded by the EU must not be in contradiction with the fundamental values that the EU wishes to promote through its external policies and must not undermine the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social and environmental criteria, human rights, the fight against counterfeiting, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity. In order to achieve this, Parliament called for the inclusion of the respective specific and binding clauses in the agreement. It also reiterated its call for an effective corporate social responsibility clause in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

    type
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    title
    T7-0411/2013
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Amendments tabled in committee
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/2
    date
    2013-10-02T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-439&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0439/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Motion for a resolution
    activities/4
    date
    2013-10-09T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0411/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2
    New
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
    activities/1
    date
    2013-10-01T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-436&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0436/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Motion for a resolution
    activities/2
    date
    2013-10-02T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-439&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0439/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Motion for a resolution
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131008&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-411 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0411/2013
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/title
    Old
    EU - China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement
    New
    Resolution on the EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities
    • date: 2013-08-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.721 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.721 body: EP type: Amendments tabled in committee
    • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2013-10-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    INTA/7/12967
    geographical_area
    China
    reference
    2013/2674(RSP)
    title
    EU - China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2
    stage_reached
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    subtype
    Resolution on statements
    type
    RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
    subject