BETA

Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage



2014/0005(COD) Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Next event: Debate in plenary scheduled 2016/10/04 more...
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET
Opinion AFET LOCHBIHLER Barbara (Verts/ALE)
Lead INTA SCHAAKE Marietje (ALDE) FISAS AYXELÀ Santiago (EPP), RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada (S&D), LOONES Sander (ECR), FORENZA Eleonora (GUE/NGL), KELLER Ska (Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana (EFD)
Opinion INTA
Lead committee dossier: INTA/8/00332
Legal Basis RoP 061-p2, TFEU 207

Activites

  • 2016/10/04 Debate in plenary scheduled
  • 2015/11/19 Opening of interinstitutional negotiations with the report amended in plenary
  • 2015/10/27 Matter referred back to the committee responsible
  • 2015/10/27 Results of vote in Parliament
    • Results of vote in Parliament
    • T8-0368/2015 summary
  • 2015/10/26 Debate in Parliament
  • 2015/09/29 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
    • A8-0267/2015 summary
  • 2015/09/22 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2014/10/20 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2014/02/24 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2014/01/14 Legislative proposal published
    • COM(2014)0001 summary
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', 'title': 'Trade'}, ASHTON Catherine

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
97 2014/0005(COD)
2015/06/15 AFET 53 amendments...
source: 555.012
2015/06/25 INTA 44 amendments...
source: 560.865

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/9
date
2016-10-04T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/9
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/9
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/7/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26168&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/7/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/8
date
2015-11-19T00:00:00
body
unknown
type
Opening of interinstitutional negotiations with the report amended in plenary
activities/7/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    The matter had been referred back to the competent committee for re-consideration. The vote on the legislative resolution has been put back to a later session.

    The main amendments adopted in plenary are the following:

    Definition of ‘broker’: Parliament feels that the EU should also be able to enforce this Regulation when EU nationals or legal persons established in the EU are involved in transactions that take place outside the Union territory. Prohibiting the provision of such services serves the purpose of protecting public morals and respecting the principles of human dignity which underpin European values, as embodied in the Treaty on European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

    Prohibition of commercial marketing and promotion: any transit of goods listed in Annex II (banned from import and export) shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such goods, unless it is demonstrated that, in the country to which the goods will be exported, such goods will be used for the exclusive purpose of public display in a museum in view of their historic significance.

    Similarly, online and offline commercial marketing and promotion activities within the Union, by any natural or legal person or partnership, for the purpose of the transfer of goods listed in Annex II shall be prohibited.

    All companies marketing security equipment must be made aware of the fact that such equipment could be used for torture and other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment and that marketing such equipment may become prohibited and authorisations relating to it may be withdrawn.

    Targeted end-use clause: Parliament proposed to insert such a clause in order for Member States to suspend or halt the transfer of security-related items not listed in Annexes II and III that clearly have no practical use other than for the purposes of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment, or where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the transfer of those items would lead to the facilitation or the commission of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment. Powers granted under the targeted end-use clause should not extend to medical products that could be used for the purpose of capital punishment,

    Criteria for granting export authorisations: the amended text stipulates that the competent authority shall not grant any authorisation when there are reasonable grounds to believe that goods listed in Annex III and Annex IIIa might be used for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including judicial corporal punishment, by a law enforcement authority or any natural or legal person in a third country.

    The competent authority shall take into account available international court judgements and findings of the competent bodies of the UN, the Council of Europe and the EU.

    Transit authorisation requirement: Members proposed to strengthen the provision regarding authorisation in order to prevent the transit of goods for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Technical assistance delivered independently of the supply of equipment: a supplier of technical assistance shall be prohibited from giving instruction, advice, training or transmitting working knowledge or skills that could aid the commission of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Exchange of best practices: the Commission, in cooperation with competent authorities of the Member States and third countries where appropriate, shall adopt best practice guidelines on the verification of end-use.

    Non-listed goods: Members suggested introducing a catch-all clause to ensure that additional safeguards against the risks are in place with regard to the export of goods not listed in the annexes. In such cases the Commission should adopt delegated acts adding items to Annex II, Annex III or Annex IIIa. Medicinal products, as defined in Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council shall be excluded from the scope of this prohibition.

    Customs procedures: if a customs declaration is made concerning goods listed in Annex II, III, or IIIa and it is confirmed that no authorisation has been granted pursuant to this Regulation for the intended export or import, the customs authorities shall detain the goods declared and draw attention to the possibility to apply for an authorisation pursuant to the Regulation. If the competent authority dismisses such an application, the customs authorities shall dispose of the detained goods.

    Delegation of power: the delegation of powers has been carried out under Regulation (EU) 37/2014 (the "Trade Omnibus I"). Consequently, provisions on the delegation of powers in the current proposal are redundant and are deleted.

    Anti-Torture Coordination Group: Parliament proposed the setting up of Coordination Group chaired by a representative of the Commission. Each Member State shall appoint a representative to this Group. It shall examine any question concerning the application of the Regulation and take appropriate measures to establish direct cooperation and exchange of information between competent authorities.

    Report: three years after the entry into force of the Regulation and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the implementation of the Regulation and present a comprehensive report which may include proposals for its amendment. 

    The Commission shall assess whether rules on penalties laid down by Member States are of a similar nature and effect.

    Union General Export Authorisation No EU (Annex II Part 2): Members deleted from the Annex certain countries that have not abolished the death penalty or have not ratified without reservation the 2nd Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Benin, Madagascar, Liberia, Mongolia and Sao Tomé-et-Principe).

activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014PC0001:EN
activities/6
date
2015-10-27T00:00:00
body
unknown
type
Matter referred back to the committee responsible
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 061-p2
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151026&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/6/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0368 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0368/2015
activities/6/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Marietje SCHAAKE (ADLE, NL) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:

    Definition of ‘broker’: Members feel that the EU should also be able to enforce this Regulation when EU nationals or legal persons established in the EU are involved in transactions that take place outside the Union territory.

    Prohibition of commercial marketing and promotion: online and offline commercial marketing and promotion activities within the Union, by any natural or legal person or partnership, for the purpose of the transfer of goods listed in Annex II shall be prohibited.

    Targeted end-use clause: Members propose to insert such a clause in order for Member States to suspend or halt the transfer of security-related items not listed in Annexes II and III that clearly have no practical use other than for the purposes of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment, or where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the transfer of those items would lead to the facilitation or the commission of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment. Powers granted under the targeted end-use clause should not extend to medical products that could be used for the purpose of capital punishment,

    Criteria for granting export authorisations: the amended text stipulates that the competent authority shall not grant any authorisation when there are reasonable grounds to believe that goods listed in Annex III and Annex IIIa might be used for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including judicial corporal punishment, by a law enforcement authority or any natural or legal person in a third country.

    The competent authority shall take into account available international court judgements and findings of the competent bodies of the UN, the Council of Europe and the EU.

    Transit authorisation requirement: Members proposed to strengthen the provision regarding authorisation in order to prevent the transit of goods for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Technical assistance delivered independently of the supply of equipment: a supplier of technical assistance shall be prohibited from giving instruction, advice, training or transmitting working knowledge or skills that could aid the commission of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Exchange of best practices: Members consider that best practice guidelines built upon the experiences of both Member States and third country authorities would set a clearer framework for determining the end-use of goods that could be misused for capital punishment, thereby also facilitating legitimate exports for intended use, especially in the medicinal and pharmaceutical sector.

    Non-listed goods: Members suggested introducing a catch-all clause to ensure that additional safeguards against the risks are in place with regard to the export of goods not listed in the annexes. In such cases the Commission should adopt delegated acts adding items to Annex II, Annex III or Annex IIIa. 

    Customs procedures: if a customs declaration is made concerning goods listed in Annex II, III, or IIIa and it is confirmed that no authorisation has been granted pursuant to this Regulation for the intended export or import, the customs authorities shall detain the goods declared and draw attention to the possibility to apply for an authorisation pursuant to the Regulation. If the competent authority dismisses such an application, the customs authorities shall dispose of the detained goods.

    Delegation of power: the delegation of powers has been carried out under Regulation (EU) 37/2014 (the "Trade Omnibus I"). Consequently, provisions on the delegation of powers in the current proposal are redundant and are deleted.

    Anti-Torture Coordination Group: Members proposed the setting up of Coordination Group chaired by a representative of the Commission. Each Member State shall appoint a representative to this Group. It shall examine any question concerning the application of the Regulation and take appropriate measures to establish direct cooperation and exchange of information between competent authorities.

    Report: three years after the entry into force of the Regulation and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the implementation of the Regulation and present a comprehensive report which may include proposals for its amendment. 

    The Commission shall assess whether rules on penalties laid down by Member States are of a similar nature and effect.

    Annex II Part 2: Members deleted from the Annex certain countries that have not abolished the death penalty or have not ratified without reservation the 2nd Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Benin, Madagascar, Liberia, Mongolia and Sao Tomé-et-Principe).

activities/3
date
2015-09-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/4
date
2015-09-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0267&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0267/2015
body
EP
committees
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5
date
2015-10-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/6/date
Old
2015-11-24T00:00:00
New
2015-10-27T00:00:00
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014PC0001:EN
activities/3/date
Old
2015-09-08T00:00:00
New
2015-11-24T00:00:00
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/3
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/1/date
2014-12-03T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: LOCHBIHLER Barbara
activities/1/committees/2/date
2015-01-21T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
activities/1/committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FISAS AYXELÀ Santiago
  • group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada
  • group: ECR name: LOONES Sander
  • group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
activities/2/committees/1/date
2014-12-03T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: LOCHBIHLER Barbara
activities/2/committees/2/date
2015-01-21T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
activities/2/committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FISAS AYXELÀ Santiago
  • group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada
  • group: ECR name: LOONES Sander
  • group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
committees/1/date
2014-12-03T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: LOCHBIHLER Barbara
committees/2/date
2015-01-21T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FISAS AYXELÀ Santiago
  • group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada
  • group: ECR name: LOONES Sander
  • group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
activities/1/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
activities/1/committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
activities/2/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
activities/2/committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/8/00331
New
INTA/8/00332
activities/2
date
2014-10-20T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/7/15015
New
AFET/8/00331
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0001
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0001
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0001
New
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0001
activities/1
date
2014-02-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/7/15015
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52014DC0001:EN
New
CELEX:52014PC0001:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52014PC0001:EN
New
CELEX:52014DC0001:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: in June 2005, the Council of the European Union adopted Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The Regulation entered into force on 30 July 2006.

    In response to calls from the European Parliament in 2010 and indications that medicines exported from the Union had been used for capital punishment in a third country, the lists of prohibited and controlled goods in Annexes II and III to that Regulation were amended by means of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1352/2011.

    The Commission also started a process to review Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 in its entirety, responding in particular to a Resolution of the European Parliament of 17 June 2010. In spring 2012, the Commission issued a call for applications with a view to establishing a Group of Experts to assist it with this review. During the period from July 2012 to July 2013, the Group of Experts met six times in Brussels with relevant Commission services.

    CONTENT: the main amendments that the Commission proposes to make to Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 focus on the following:

    Export controls targeting capital punishment: given these firm international commitments under either Protocol No 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights or, the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, exports to the States that are parties to one of them need not be subject to specific authorisation in order to prevent the relevant goods from being used for capital punishment and can be covered by a general export authorisation.

    According to the proposal, such authorisation should be subject to appropriate conditions to avoid the diversion of the goods to a country that has not abolished capital punishment without prior scrutiny by the competent authorities. The general authorisation should, therefore, only apply where the end-user of the exported goods is established in the country of destination and no re-export to another country takes place. If these conditions are not met, a request for a specific or global authorisation should be made to the competent authorities.

    Additional measures concerning listed goods: the proposal prohibits brokers in the Union from providing brokering services in relation to goods whose export and import are prohibited as such goods have no practical use other than for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Prohibiting the provision of such services serves the purpose of protecting public morals.

    Where controls on exports are applied, the provision of brokering services and the supply of technical assistance in relation to any of the listed goods should be prohibited, if the broker or supplier of technical assistance is aware that the relevant goods are or may be intended for capital punishment, when the controls are applied to prevent use for such punishment, or for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, when the controls are intended to prevent such use.

    Definition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment: the definition in Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 currently covers acts inflicting ‘significant pain or suffering’, whereas the definition of torture refers to ‘severe pain or suffering’.

    Instead of being based on different levels of pain or suffering, the distinction between these types of acts should take account of the presence or absence of an intention to inflict pain or suffering and of the use of pain or suffering for a purpose included in the definition of torture.

    The definition of ‘other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’, which is not found in the Convention, should be amended to align it with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The Commission also considers it appropriate to clarify the meaning of the term ‘lawful penalties’ in the definitions of ‘torture’ and ‘other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’, taking into account this case-law and the Union’s policy on capital punishment.

    Exchange of information between customs authorities: the proposal requires customs authorities to share certain information with other customs authorities and, when they detect prohibited exports or imports of goods or exports of goods for which the required authorisation has not been granted, to inform the relevant authorities with a view to imposing penalties on the economic operator that committed the infringement.

    DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
ASHTON Catherine
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
ASHTON Catherine
activities
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0001 celexid: CELEX:52014PC0001:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2014)0001 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
links
European Commission
other
    procedure
    reference
    2014/0005(COD)
    instrument
    Regulation
    legal_basis
    Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 207
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    summary
    subtype
    Legislation
    title
    Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
    type
    COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
    subject