BETA


2014/0059(COD) Supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA WINKLER Iuliu (icon: PPE PPE) ARENA Maria (icon: S&D S&D), MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR), DE SARNEZ Marielle (icon: ALDE ALDE), KELLER Ska (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Former Responsible Committee INTA
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion DEVE WENTA Bogdan Brunon (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Former Committee Opinion AFET
Former Committee Opinion DEVE Nirj DEVA (icon: ECR ECR), Louis MICHEL (icon: ALDE ALDE), Judith SARGENTINI (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG
Former Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207

Events

2017/05/19
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to put an end to the financing of armed groups through trade in minerals from conflict areas.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

CONTENT: human rights abuses are common in resource-rich conflict-affected and high-risk areas and may include child labour, sexual violence, the disappearance of people, forced resettlement and the destruction of ritually or culturally significant sites.

Purpose and scope : this Regulation establishes a Union system for supply chain due diligence in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold.

At least 95% of all EU imports of metals and minerals will be covered, while small volume importers will be exempt.

The Regulation builds upon 2011 OECD guidelines which set the international benchmark for supply chain due diligence.

Importers’ obligations : this Regulation obliges EU companies to source their imports of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold responsibly and to ensure that their supply chains do not contribute to funding armed conflict. To this end, it lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold.

Union importers of minerals shall :

identify and assess the risks of adverse impacts in their mineral supply chain on the basis of the information provided by independent third-party audits of the smelters and refiners in the supply chain; implement a strategy to respond to the identified risks; provide the competent authorities of the Member State with evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission; make available to their immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to their supply chain due diligence; prepare a report , on an annual basis, on their supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing.

The competent authorities shall carry out checks to ensure that EU importers of minerals and metals comply with their due diligence obligations.

Certification : governments, industry associations and groupings of interested organisations having due diligence schemes in place may apply to the Commission to have the supply chain due diligence schemes that are developed and overseen by them recognised by the Commission.

The Commission shall establish and keep up-to-date a register of recognised supply chain due diligence schemes. That register shall be made publicly available on the internet. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing or amending the list of the names and addresses of global responsible smelters and refiners .

Guidelines : the Commission, in consultation with the European External Action Service and the OECD, shall prepare non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

Review clause : by 1 January 2023 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and the effectiveness of the Union system, and its impact on the ground as regards the promotion of responsible sourcing of the minerals falling within the scope of this Regulation from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and on Union economic operators including SMEs. It shall propose new mandatory measures in order to ensure sufficient leverage of the total Union market on the responsible global supply chain of minerals.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 8.6.2017.

APPLICATION: from 9.7.2017. Rules relating to due diligence shall apply as from 1.1.2021.

DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delegated acts for the amendment of Annex I to the Regulation by establishing and amending the volume thresholds of minerals and metals falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2017/821 according to the Combined Nomenclature. The power to adopt such acts shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years (renewable) from 8 June 2017. The European Parliament or the Council shall have the right to object to a delegated act within a period of two months (extendable for two months) from the notification of the act.

2017/05/17
   EU - For information
2017/05/17
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2017/05/17
   CSL - Final act signed
2017/05/17
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/05/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/04/03
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2017/04/03
   CSL - Council Meeting
2017/03/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/03/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 558 votes to 17, with 45 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal.

Subject matter and scope : the Regulation, by controlling trade in minerals from conflict areas, is one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups . It lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold.

This Regulation shall not apply to Union importers of minerals or metals, where their annual import volume of each of the minerals or metals concerned is below the volume thresholds set out in Annex I to the Regulation.

All volume thresholds are set at a level that ensures that the vast majority, but no less than 95 %, of the total volumes imported into the Union of each mineral and metal under the Combined Nomenclature code is subject to the obligations of Union importers set out in this Regulation.

In exercising its power to adopt delegated acts to modify existing thresholds, the Commission has undertaken to take account of the position of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises which import gold.

Importers’ obligations : Union importers of minerals or metals shall comply with the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in this Regulation and shall keep documentation demonstrating their respective compliance with those obligations.

Union importers of metals shall identify and assess, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance , the risks in their supply chain based on available third-party audit reports concerning the smelters and refiners in that chain, and, by assessing, as appropriate, the due diligence practices of those smelters and refiners.

Union importers shall carry out audits of their own supply chain due diligence via an independent third-party unless there is evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission.

The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing or amending the list of the names and addresses of global responsible smelters and refiners.

Disclosure obligations : Union importers shall: (i) make available to the Member State competent authorities the reports of any third party audit carried out or evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission; (ii) make available to their immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to their supply chain due diligence: (iii) publicly report as widely as possible, including on the internet, and on an annual basis on their supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing.

Certification : the amended text stipulates that governments, industry associations and groupings of interested organisations having due diligence schemes in place (‘scheme owners’) may apply to the Commission to have the supply chain due diligence schemes that are developed and overseen by them recognised by the Commission.

The methodology and criteria for such schemes to be recognised as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation shall be established in a delegated act to avoid double auditing. Such schemes shall incorporate the overarching due diligence principles, ensure that requirements are aligned to the specific recommendations of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.

The Commission shall establish and keep up-to-date a register of recognised supply chain due diligence schemes. It shall be made publicly available on the internet.

Guidelines : in response to the European Parliament's request for specific guidelines, the Commission shall prepare non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

By means of such guidelines, relevant companies with more than 500 employees that are required to disclose non-financial information would be encouraged to disclose specific information in relation to products containing tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold.

Review clause : by 1 January 2023 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation in order assess the adequacy and implementation of these due diligence schemes and the impact of the Union system on the ground. It shall propose new mandatory measures in order to ensure sufficient leverage of the total Union market on the responsible global supply chain of minerals.

Documents
2017/03/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/01/24
   EP - Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
2015/05/20
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament, by 402 votes to 118 with 171 abstentions, adopted amendments to

the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

The question was referred back to the competent committee for re-consideration and the vote was deferred to a later session.

The main amendments adopted amended the Commission proposal as follows:

Purpose: the Regulation was one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups by means of controlling trade of minerals from conflict regions . It reflected the need for due diligence along the entire supply chain from the sourcing site to the final product.

Accordingly, all companies who first place covered resources, including products that contain those resources on the Union market must conduct and publicly report on their supply chain due diligence.

Certification system : Parliament stated that the Regulation should establish the European certification of responsibility' (and not just self-certification as the Commission had proposed) regarding due diligence obligations in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold.

All Union importers who source minerals and metals falling within the scope of this Regulation must conform to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.

Downstream companies : these companies must take all reasonable steps to identify and address any risks arising in their supply chains for minerals and metals coming within the scope of the Regulation. In this connection, they should be required to provide information on the due diligence practices they employ for responsible supply chains. The exercise of due diligence must be tailored to the activities of the undertaking in question, its size and its position in the supply chain. The Commission may provide further guidelines on the obligations to be met by undertakings, depending on their position in the supply chain, to ensure that the system involves a flexible procedure that takes into account the position of SMEs.

Verification by third-parties : certified responsible importers of smelted and refined metals shall be exempted from carrying out independent third-party audits provided they submit substantive evidence that all smelters and refiners in their supply chain conform to the provisions of the Regulation.

List of responsible importers : the Commission should adopt and make publicly available a decision listing the names and addresses of responsible importers of minerals and metals within the scope of the Regulation. It must update and publish, including on the internet, the information included in the list in a timely manner.

Due diligence obligations applicable to smelters and refiners : smelters and refiners established in the Union which process and import minerals and concentrates thereof would have an obligation to apply the Union system for supply chain due diligence or a due diligence system recognised as equivalent by the Commission. If there were a failure to comply with these obligations, the authorities would notify the fact to the smelter or refiner, and ask them to take corrective measures in order to comply with the European due diligence system.

In the event of a persistent failure to comply, Member States competent authorities would impose penalties for the infringement.

Transition period : provision should be made for a two-year transitional period to allow the Commission to set up a third-party audit system and for responsible importers to become familiar with their obligations under the Regulation.

Accompanying measures : the Commission should submit a legislative proposal , as appropriate, within the transitional period setting up accompanying measures in order to enhance the effectiveness of this Regulation in line with responsible sourcing of minerals. These should cover the following:

support for responsibly sourcing enterprises in the form of incentives, technical assistance and guidance to enterprises, taking into account the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises; ongoing policy dialogues with third countries; continued, targeted development cooperation with third countries , in particular aid for the marketing of non-conflict minerals; close cooperation with Member States for the launching of complementary initiatives in the area of consumer, investor and customer information.

Strengthened review clause : Parliament recommended stricter monitoring of the system, with a review two years after its application and every three years thereafter (rather than three and six years respectively, as proposed by the Commission).

Documents
2015/05/20
   EP - Matter referred back to the committee responsible
2015/05/19
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/04/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:

Purpose and scope : Members felt that the Regulation was one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups by means of controlling trade of minerals from conflict regions. The latter should ensure that the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation was broken .

Accordingly, the objective of the Regulation was to lay down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-declared as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. Metals reasonably assumed to be recycled should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.

The definition of importers was widened to enable traders to self-certify and participate in the new system.

Conformity assessment : the importer responsible for the minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation should request a notified conformity assessment body carry out a conformity assessment in accordance with a conformity assessment scheme .

The Commission shall adopt an implementing act establishing one or more conformity assessment scheme(s) covering all of the responsible importer's activities, processes and systems used to implement supply chain due diligence.

Member States should notify the Commission and the other Member States of bodies authorised to carry out third-party conformity assessment tasks under the Regulation. The Commission should make publicly available the list of the bodies.

Members set out the requirements related to conformity assessment bodies seeking notification and also set out the obligations of notified conformity assessment bodies.

A conformity assessment body should be a third-party body independent of the importer it assesses and the smelter or refiner, the smelter's or refiner's subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, suppliers and companies cooperating in the conformity assessment.

Where a notified conformity assessment body found that an importer had not met requirements of the conformity assessment scheme, it should require that importer to take appropriate corrective measures and should not issue a certificate.

Where corrective measures were not adopted or did not have the required effect, the assessment body should suspend or withdraw the certificate if necessary.

List of responsible importers : in order to provide visibility for the efforts of companies taking on commitments in this domain, the Commission should draw up a list of responsible importers on the basis of reports on the implementation of the regulation by the Member States.

The ‘European responsible importer’ label : responsible importers should be granted a ‘European responsible importer’ label by Member States’ competent authorities. The label should be suspended or withdrawn where there is non-compliance.

Due diligence obligations applicable to smelters and refiners : Members proposed that the Regulation must be compulsorily applied for smelters and refiners established in the Union, who were key actors in the supply chain, as they were involved in the stage when minerals were processed. They were therefore in a better position to gather, communicate and verify information about the origin of minerals and the various operators that had been responsible for them.

Establishment of a "European certification of responsibility" for companies operating downstream: companies established in the Union operating downstream of the supply chain of minerals and taking due diligence measures, might be granted a "European certification of responsibility “by the competent authorities of the Member States.

Review: two years after the date of application of the Regulation and every three years thereafter, the Commission will review the functioning and effectiveness of the Regulation and the latest impact of the scheme both in the EU and on the ground.

The Regulation should apply two years after its entry into force.

Documents
2015/04/14
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2015/03/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/03/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/03/06
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2015/02/03
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2014/10/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2014/09/29
   EP - WENTA Bogdan Brunon (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2014/09/03
   EP - WINKLER Iuliu (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2014/03/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2014/03/05
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish an EU system of self-certification for importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: t he European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: the proposal notes that international measures exist to promote responsible sourcing of minerals in areas at risk or affected by armed conflict. The two best-known were adopted in 2011 and 2010 respectively: the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Due Diligence Guidance) and Section 1502 of the United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which focuses on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nine adjoining countries.

Whilst the trade of conflict minerals is very well documented in the case of the DRC, other cases abound elsewhere in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Against this background, the Commission and the High Representative have been working to develop a comprehensive EU responsible mineral sourcing framework. This work follows up a 2010 European Parliament resolution calling for the EU to legislate along the lines of US legislation as well as two Communications in 2011 and 2012 that announced the Commission's intention to explore ways of improving supply chain transparency.

It should be noted that this legislative proposal is accompanied by a Communication detailing other policy measures that can be deployed to tackle the problem as broadly as possible.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission examined six options. The preferred option comprises the adoption of a Regulation establishing obligations under a 'EU Responsible Importer' certification based on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance – voluntary.

CONTENT: the main objective of this proposal is to help reduce the financing of armed groups and security forces through mineral proceeds in conflict-affected and high-risk areas by supporting and further promoting responsible sourcing practices of EU companies in relation to tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold originating from such areas.

The draft regulation lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-certified as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, as set out in Annex I.

Self-certification as a responsible importer : a ny importer of minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation may self-certify as responsible importer by declaring to a Member State competent authority that it adheres to the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in the Regulation. The declaration shall contain documentation in which the importer confirms its adherence to the obligations including results of the independent third-party audits carried out.

Member State competent authorities shall carry out appropriate ex-post checks in order to ensure that self-certified responsible importers of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation comply with their obligations.

OECD Due Diligence Guidance : the Regulation relies on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance to define obligations for EU importers that opt to be self-certified as responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten ores and metals, and gold, on the basis of a self-declaration of compliance.

EU importers opting for self-certification are obliged to integrate all elements of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in their management system by: (i) maintaining a system of controls and transparency over the mineral supply chain, which includes inter alia the country of mineral origin and the smelters/refiners; (ii) identifying and assessing risks in the supply chain against the OECD model supply chain policy; (iii) designing and implementing a strategy to respond to identified risks; (iv) obtaining independent third-party audit assurances of supply chain due diligence; and (v) reporting publicly on supply chain due diligence.

Disclosure : the EU self-certified importer is required to disclose annually to the Member State competent authority the identity and geographical location of the smelters/refiners in its supply chain.

The importer is also required to provide independent third-party audit assurances and pass them on to Member States' competent authorities and to downstream purchasers, with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns.

On the basis of the information disclosed to the competent authorities, the EU will publish annually, after consultation with the OECD, a list of responsible smelters and refiners that source according to the Regulation.

Infringement: in the case of infringement, competent authorities will issue a notice of remedial action to be taken by the EU importer. If such action is inadequate, the authority will then issue a non-recognition notice for the responsible importer certificate for the minerals and metals covered by the draft Regulation.

Budgetary implications: the present proposal entails limited financial implications for the Union budget for administrative purposes: EUR 2.72 million for the period 2014-2018.

2014/03/05
   ECHR - Document attached to the procedure
Details

The Commission and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy present a Joint Communication aiming for an integrated EU approach to responsible sourcing of minerals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The paper discusses how to break the link between minerals extraction and conflict and confirms that the Commission and High Representative will promote strong and coherent EU raw materials diplomacy.

The problem is most acute in Africa, particularly in the Great Lakes Region (GLR). |Recent studies show that resource-related conflicts are currently prevalent in Africa (27 cases) and the Americas (21 cases), but less prevalent in Asia and Oceania (11 cases), the Middle East and Maghreb (7 cases) and Europe (4 cases).

This Communication accompanies a Commission proposal setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. The following accompanying measures will enhance the impact of the regulation and further encourage the responsible sourcing of minerals :

· Incentives for companies to promote responsible sourcing. These include promotion of responsible practices by smelters and refiners : the EU has provided financial support for the implementation of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance since January 2014 and will continue to do so through the Instrument for Stability. Support will focus on capacity-building and outreach activities, targeting public authorities, the private sector and civil society organisations involved in the supply chain of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

· Funding possibilities for SMEs for the voluntary certification scheme : t he Commission will explore funding to promote the uptake of the future voluntary certification scheme within the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SME's Programme (COSME).

· Public Procurement incentives : performance clauses will be inserted in the Commission's own public procurement contracts. Products purchased through public procurement containing tin, tantalum, tungsten and/or gold will therefore need to respect OECD Due Diligence Guidance or equivalent due diligence schemes in order to satisfy contractual obligations.

· Use of government-to-business networks to facilitate uptake of the EU 'responsible importer' certificate : National Contact Points established under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises will help raise awareness of the certification procedure established under the draft Regulation, as will the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN)

· "Letters of Intent" – industry commitments : the EU will take action to provide visibility to the efforts of companies that provide letters of intent announcing relevant commitments.

Policy dialogues with third countries and other stakeholders

· Building on existing policy dialogues : the EU will use its political, development, trade and security dialogues and contacts with governments in mining, producing, processing and consuming countries (and has already begun in South American and Caribbean countries) to further develop a common understanding of the needs, and opportunities of conflict-free and responsible mineral extraction.

· Reaching out to countries hosting smelters : the EU will engage with the countries where the majority of the world's smelters/refiners are located, notably China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Russia to promote its integrated approach and will hold an international conference on responsible sourcing of minerals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas in 2015.

· A responsible sourcing chapter in raw materials dialogues : t he EU will use its raw materials dialogues inter alia with China, Japan and Mongolia, and has recently launched a raw materials dialogue with Myanmar/Burma.

Development cooperation with third countries : t he key lines of intervention through which the EU may support partner countries are:

· transposing the OECD Due Diligence Guidance into national due diligence frameworks and legislation;

· building further capacity to implement the national due diligence frameworks ;

· supporting advocacy and political dialogues in the countries concerned between local and central government authorities, civil society organisations and business operators ;

· creating visibility for the actions carried out and the results achieved by the producer countries.

Honest broker – raw materials diplomacy : the Commission services and the EEAS will gather and analyse data regarding multi-stakeholder initiatives. Public-private alliances will be given due consideration.

EU Member States : complementary initiatives could be developed at national level in the area of consumer information and labelling and further incentives for responsible corporate behaviour created. Moreover, the Commission will encourage EU Member States to foster the uptake of OECD Due Diligence Guidance through performance clauses of procurement contracts signed by their authorities and will develop recommendations for Member State authorising officers.

Documents
2014/03/05
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2014/03/05
   EC - Document attached to the procedure

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 2 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 473, -: 209, 0: 11
FR ES IT GB DE BE SE DK PT AT NL RO LU LT FI SK EE BG CZ IE CY EL MT HR LV SI HU PL
Total
70
44
64
69
89
21
20
13
20
18
24
30
6
11
13
13
6
15
21
9
6
19
5
11
6
7
18
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
198

Belgium PPE

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

3
6

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 11 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 354, +: 329, 0: 5
PL FR HU BG NL CZ SI LT FI HR DK EE LV SK AT BE RO IE MT SE CY LU PT DE EL ES GB IT
Total
43
68
18
15
24
21
7
11
13
11
13
6
6
13
18
21
29
9
5
20
6
4
20
89
20
44
69
64
icon: PPE PPE
195
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
47

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45
5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 12 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 350, -: 331, 0: 10
PL FR GB HU BG CZ NL HR SI LT FI DK SK EE LV AT BE RO MT SE CY LU IE PT EL DE ES IT
Total
44
70
69
18
15
21
24
11
7
11
12
13
13
6
6
18
21
29
5
20
6
6
9
20
20
87
44
65
icon: PPE PPE
195
2

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2
icon: NI NI
48

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 17 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 335, +: 327, 0: 32
PL HU BG BE LT NL CZ HR SI SK FI DK RO LU EE LV FR IE MT AT CY DE PT SE ES EL GB IT
Total
43
18
15
21
11
24
21
11
7
13
13
13
30
6
6
6
70
9
5
18
6
89
20
20
44
20
69
65
icon: PPE PPE
198

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
182

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 40 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 347, -: 333, 0: 9
PL FR HU BG BE LT CZ HR SI SK NL FI DK RO LU EE AT LV IE MT DE CY PT SE EL ES GB IT
Total
41
70
18
15
21
11
21
11
7
13
24
13
13
30
6
6
18
6
9
5
88
6
20
20
20
44
67
65
icon: PPE PPE
197

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Germany NI

2

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
181

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 41 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 354, +: 326, 0: 15
PL FR HU BG CZ SI LT NL SK FI HR DK RO EE LV AT BE IE MT CY LU SE PT EL DE ES GB IT
Total
44
70
18
15
21
7
11
24
13
13
11
13
30
6
6
18
21
9
5
6
6
20
20
20
89
44
69
65
icon: PPE PPE
199
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
182

Czechia S&D

4

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 50 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 337, +: 325, 0: 31
PL FR BG CZ HR SI SK LT NL HU FI DK EE LV RO AT BE MT CY LU IE SE PT EL DE GB ES IT
Total
44
70
15
21
11
7
13
11
24
18
13
13
6
6
30
18
21
5
6
6
9
20
20
20
89
68
44
64
icon: PPE PPE
198
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
182

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 90 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 376, +: 310, 0: 5
IT ES PT DK EL SE DE IE CY MT LT LU AT EE LV FI RO CZ HR SK SI BE BG HU NL GB FR PL
Total
63
44
20
13
20
20
89
9
5
5
11
6
18
6
6
13
30
21
11
13
7
21
15
18
24
69
69
44
icon: S&D S&D
181

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
47

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Portugal ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
199

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 73=94=114=132 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 353, +: 326, 0: 8
IT ES PT IE DE DK LU EL BE SE CY AT RO MT SK LT EE LV SI FI HR CZ BG HU NL GB FR PL
Total
64
44
20
9
88
13
5
19
21
20
6
18
30
4
13
11
6
6
7
13
11
21
15
18
23
69
69
43
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
46

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
196

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 74=95=115=133 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 350, +: 330, 0: 13
IT ES DE PT IE DK AT BE LU EL SE CY MT RO LT EE LV SK FI HR SI CZ BG NL HU GB FR PL
Total
64
44
89
20
9
13
18
21
6
20
20
6
5
30
11
6
6
13
12
11
7
21
15
24
18
69
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
198

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 75=96=116=134 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 335, +: 327, 0: 31
IT ES GB PT IE DK SE BE LU EL DE CY MT AT RO SK LT EE LV FI HR SI CZ BG HU NL FR PL
Total
64
44
69
20
9
13
20
21
6
20
89
6
5
18
30
13
11
6
6
13
11
7
21
15
18
23
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 76=97=117=135 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 332, -: 329, 0: 30
IT ES GB PT DE SE IE BE LU DK RO EL CY MT AT SK LT EE LV FI HU HR SI CZ BG NL FR PL
Total
64
44
69
20
88
20
9
21
6
13
30
20
6
5
18
12
11
6
6
12
18
11
7
21
15
24
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
58

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
198

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 77=98=118=136 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 330, -: 327, 0: 37
IT ES GB DE PT IE AT SE BE DK LU EL CY MT RO LT EE LV FI HU SK HR SI CZ BG NL FR PL
Total
65
44
69
89
20
9
18
20
21
13
5
20
6
5
30
11
6
6
13
18
13
11
7
21
15
24
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 25 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 318, -: 313, 0: 60
PL HU BG CZ BE SI LT SK NL FI HR RO LU EE LV FR IE MT AT CY DE SE DK PT EL GB ES IT
Total
44
18
15
21
21
7
10
12
23
13
11
30
6
6
6
70
9
5
18
6
89
20
13
19
20
69
44
65
icon: PPE PPE
196

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
4

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
182

Czechia S&D

4

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 101 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 361, +: 322, 0: 7
IT ES PT DK LU IE EL SE CY BE DE MT AT RO EE LV FI LT HU HR SK SI CZ BG GB NL FR PL
Total
63
44
20
13
6
8
20
20
6
21
88
5
18
30
6
6
13
10
18
11
13
7
21
15
69
24
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
181

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3
4

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
197

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 81=102=122=141 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 345, +: 325, 0: 22
IT ES PT AT BE LU IE DE SE EL DK MT RO CY SK LT EE LV FI HU HR SI CZ BG GB NL FR PL
Total
65
44
20
18
21
6
9
89
20
19
13
5
30
4
13
11
6
6
13
18
11
7
21
15
69
24
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
181

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Slovakia ECR

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 82=103=123=142 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 350, +: 333, 0: 9
IT ES PT DE DK LU IE BE SE CY EL MT AT RO SK EE LV SI LT FI HU HR CZ BG NL GB FR PL
Total
65
44
20
88
13
6
9
21
20
6
19
5
18
30
13
6
6
7
10
13
18
11
21
15
24
69
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
181

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
4

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2
6

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 83=104=124=143 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 356, +: 330, 0: 6
IT ES PT DK LU IE EL SE CY BE DE MT AT RO LT EE LV SI FI SK HR CZ BG NL HU GB FR PL
Total
65
44
20
13
6
9
20
20
6
21
88
5
18
30
11
6
6
7
13
13
10
20
15
24
18
69
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
196

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 84=105=125=144 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 351, +: 333, 0: 10
IT ES PT DK DE LU IE BE EL SE CY MT AT RO SK LT EE LV HR FI HU SI CZ BG NL GB FR PL
Total
65
44
20
13
89
6
9
21
20
20
6
5
18
30
13
11
6
6
11
13
18
7
20
15
24
69
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 42 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 347, +: 333, 0: 13
PL FR BG CZ HR SI SK LT NL HU DK FI EE LV RO DE AT BE MT CY LU IE SE PT EL ES GB IT
Total
43
70
15
21
11
7
13
11
24
18
13
13
6
6
30
89
18
21
5
6
6
9
20
20
20
44
68
65
icon: PPE PPE
197
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
48

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
182

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 87=108=128=149 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 355, +: 325, 0: 15
IT ES PT AT BE IE DK LU RO EL SE CY MT SK DE LT EE LV FI HR SI CZ BG GB NL HU FR PL
Total
65
44
20
18
21
9
13
6
30
20
20
6
5
13
90
11
6
6
13
11
7
21
15
68
24
18
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 129=150 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 355, +: 327, 0: 12
IT ES PT DK SE BE LU IE EL CY DE MT AT RO LT EE LV SK FI HR SI CZ BG NL HU GB FR PL
Total
64
44
20
13
20
21
6
9
20
6
90
5
18
30
11
6
6
13
13
11
7
21
15
24
18
68
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 107 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 369, +: 317, 0: 9
IT ES PT DK SE IE EL CY MT AT DE LU LT RO EE LV SK FI HU BE HR SI CZ BG NL GB FR PL
Total
64
44
20
13
20
9
20
6
5
18
90
6
11
30
6
6
13
13
18
21
11
7
21
15
24
69
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Portugal ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
199

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 89=109=130 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 372, +: 301, 0: 14
IT ES PT EL SE CY AT IE DK MT DE LU LT RO EE LV FI SK BE HR SI CZ BG NL HU GB FR PL
Total
65
42
20
20
20
6
18
9
13
5
87
6
11
30
6
6
13
12
21
11
7
20
15
24
18
68
69
44
icon: S&D S&D
180

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
195

Cyprus PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 110 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 379, 0: 215, +: 97
DK IE IT EL CY LV SE MT LT ES PT LU EE FI SI SK HR CZ AT BG NL HU BE RO DE FR PL GB
Total
13
9
64
20
6
6
20
5
11
44
20
6
6
13
7
13
11
21
18
15
24
18
21
30
88
69
43
69
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Netherlands NI

3

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Portugal ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 71=91=112 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 326, -: 315, 0: 49
IT ES GB PT SE DK BE LU IE DE CY FR AT EL MT RO LT EE LV SI FI HU HR SK CZ BG NL PL
Total
64
44
69
20
20
13
21
6
9
88
6
69
17
19
5
30
11
6
6
7
13
18
11
13
21
15
24
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
47

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Austria NI

3

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 72=92=113 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 355, +: 324, 0: 12
IT ES PT DK AT IE DE EL SE CY MT BE LU RO LT EE LV SI FI SK HU HR CZ BG NL GB FR PL
Total
64
44
20
13
18
9
89
20
20
6
5
20
6
30
11
6
6
7
13
13
18
11
21
15
24
69
69
43
icon: S&D S&D
181

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
48

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 93 #

2015/05/20 Outcome: -: 357, +: 311, 0: 19
IT ES PT AT IE LU EL SE DE CY DK MT BE RO LT EE LV FI HR SK SI CZ BG HU GB NL FR PL
Total
65
44
19
18
9
6
20
20
85
6
13
5
20
30
11
6
6
13
11
13
7
21
15
18
69
24
68
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
47

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
195

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Proposition modifiée #

2015/05/20 Outcome: +: 402, 0: 171, -: 118
DE ES FR PT RO SE NL DK IT BE BG FI SK IE HU LT EL CZ LU AT CY EE MT SI HR LV GB PL
Total
89
44
67
20
30
20
24
13
65
21
15
13
13
9
18
11
20
21
6
18
6
6
5
7
11
6
68
44
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Romania ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: PPE PPE
199

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

2
5

Latvia PPE

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
46

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Spain NI

1

Netherlands NI

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler - Am 156 #

2017/03/16 Outcome: +: 558, 0: 45, -: 17
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO CZ BE SE AT PT HU FI SK LT DK EL BG HR IE SI EE MT NL LU LV CY
Total
90
59
63
48
41
53
25
18
19
18
18
19
15
12
13
10
10
19
10
7
7
7
6
6
11
5
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
185

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Croatia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
163

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
54

Italy ECR

1

Czechia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
49

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Hungary NI

2
AmendmentsDossier
1093 2014/0059(COD)
2015/02/03 DEVE 205 amendments...
source: 549.096
2015/02/04 AFET 335 amendments...
source: 546.673
2015/03/24 INTA 553 amendments...
source: 549.420

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
SCHOLZ Helmut
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0
date
2014-03-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/3
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.838 title: PE546.838
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.838 title: PE546.838
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2015-03-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.796&secondRef=05 title: PE539.796
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.838
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-546838_EN.html
docs/5
date
2015-03-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.796&secondRef=05 title: PE539.796
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2015-03-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.420 title: PE549.420
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.796&secondRef=05
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-539796_EN.html
docs/6
date
2015-03-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.420 title: PE549.420
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2017-05-16T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2017)309
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.420
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-549420_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=25604&j=0&l=en
docs/7
date
2017-05-16T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2017)309
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/7
date
2017-05-17T00:00:00
docs
type
For information
body
EU
docs/8
date
2017-05-17T00:00:00
docs
type
For information
body
EU
events/0
date
2014-03-13T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2014-03-05T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/1
date
2014-03-13T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1
date
2014-10-20T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2
date
2014-10-20T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2015-04-14T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2015-04-14T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2015-04-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0141_EN.html title: A8-0141/2015
summary
events/4
date
2015-05-19T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/4
date
2015-04-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0141_EN.html title: A8-0141/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-05-19T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/5
date
2015-05-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0204_EN.html title: T8-0204/2015
summary
events/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150519&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-05-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0204_EN.html title: T8-0204/2015
summary
events/8
date
2017-03-15T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/9
date
2017-03-15T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/9/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170315&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/10
date
2017-03-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0090_EN.html title: T8-0090/2017
summary
events/11
date
2017-03-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0090_EN.html title: T8-0090/2017
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: WINKLER Iuliu date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WINKLER Iuliu group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1/date
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Development
    committee
    DEVE
    rapporteur
    name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon date: 2014-09-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Development
    committee
    DEVE
    date
    2014-09-29T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    committees/6/date
      committees/7/date
        committees/8/date
          committees/9/date
            docs/6/body
            EC
            events/4/docs/0/url
            Old
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0141&language=EN
            New
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0141_EN.html
            events/6/docs/0/url
            Old
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0204
            New
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0204_EN.html
            events/11/docs/0/url
            Old
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0090
            New
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0090_EN.html
            committees/0
            type
            Responsible Committee
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            date
            2014-09-03T00:00:00
            rapporteur
            name: WINKLER Iuliu group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
            shadows
            committees/0
            type
            Responsible Committee
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            date
            2014-09-03T00:00:00
            rapporteur
            name: WINKLER Iuliu group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
            shadows
            committees/3
            type
            Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Development
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            2014-09-29T00:00:00
            rapporteur
            name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
            committees/3
            type
            Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Development
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            2014-09-29T00:00:00
            rapporteur
            name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
            activities
            • date: 2014-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111 title: COM(2014)0111 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52014PC0111:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia type: Legislative proposal published
            • date: 2014-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2014-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DE SARNEZ Marielle group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
            • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2014-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DE SARNEZ Marielle group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
            • date: 2015-04-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2014-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DE SARNEZ Marielle group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
            • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0141&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0141/2015 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2014-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DE SARNEZ Marielle group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Ska group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE date: 2015-04-24T00:00:00
            • date: 2015-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150519&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
            • date: 2015-05-20T00:00:00 body: unknown type: Matter referred back to the committee responsible
            • date: 2015-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25604&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0204 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0204/2015 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
            • date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 body: unknown type: Opening of interinstitutional negotiations with the report amended in plenary
            • date: 2017-01-24T00:00:00 body: unknown type: Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
            • date: 2017-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170315&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
            • date: 2017-03-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0090 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0090/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
            • date: 2017-04-03T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3529
            • date: 2017-04-03T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
            • date: 2017-05-17T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
            • date: 2017-05-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
            • date: 2017-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0821 title: Regulation 2017/821 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:130:TOC title: OJ L 130 19.05.2017, p. 0001 type: Final act published in Official Journal
            commission
            • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
            committees/0
            type
            Responsible Committee
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            date
            2014-09-03T00:00:00
            rapporteur
            name: WINKLER Iuliu group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
            shadows
            committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            committee
            AFET
            committees/1
            type
            Former Responsible Committee
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            date
            committees/1
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee_full
            Budgets
            committee
            BUDG
            committees/2
            type
            Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            committee
            AFET
            opinion
            False
            committees/2
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            2014-09-29T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Development
            rapporteur
            group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon
            committees/3
            type
            Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Development
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            2014-09-29T00:00:00
            rapporteur
            name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
            committees/3
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee_full
            Development
            committee
            DEVE
            committees/4
            type
            Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Budgets
            committee
            BUDG
            opinion
            False
            committees/4
            body
            EP
            shadows
            responsible
            True
            committee
            INTA
            date
            2014-09-03T00:00:00
            committee_full
            International Trade
            rapporteur
            group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu
            committees/5
            type
            Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Industry, Research and Energy
            committee
            ITRE
            opinion
            False
            committees/5
            body
            EP
            responsible
            True
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            committees/6
            type
            Former Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            committee
            AFET
            date
            committees/6
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee_full
            Industry, Research and Energy
            committee
            ITRE
            committees/7
            type
            Former Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Development
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            committees/8
            type
            Former Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Budgets
            committee
            BUDG
            date
            committees/9
            type
            Former Committee Opinion
            body
            EP
            associated
            False
            committee_full
            Industry, Research and Energy
            committee
            ITRE
            date
            council
            • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3529 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3529*&MEET_DATE=03/04/2017 date: 2017-04-03T00:00:00
            docs
            • date: 2014-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=JOIN:2014:0008:FIN:EN:PDF title: JOIN(2014)0008 summary: The Commission and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy present a Joint Communication aiming for an integrated EU approach to responsible sourcing of minerals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The paper discusses how to break the link between minerals extraction and conflict and confirms that the Commission and High Representative will promote strong and coherent EU raw materials diplomacy. The problem is most acute in Africa, particularly in the Great Lakes Region (GLR). |Recent studies show that resource-related conflicts are currently prevalent in Africa (27 cases) and the Americas (21 cases), but less prevalent in Asia and Oceania (11 cases), the Middle East and Maghreb (7 cases) and Europe (4 cases). This Communication accompanies a Commission proposal setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. The following accompanying measures will enhance the impact of the regulation and further encourage the responsible sourcing of minerals : · Incentives for companies to promote responsible sourcing. These include promotion of responsible practices by smelters and refiners : the EU has provided financial support for the implementation of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance since January 2014 and will continue to do so through the Instrument for Stability. Support will focus on capacity-building and outreach activities, targeting public authorities, the private sector and civil society organisations involved in the supply chain of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. · Funding possibilities for SMEs for the voluntary certification scheme : t he Commission will explore funding to promote the uptake of the future voluntary certification scheme within the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SME's Programme (COSME). · Public Procurement incentives : performance clauses will be inserted in the Commission's own public procurement contracts. Products purchased through public procurement containing tin, tantalum, tungsten and/or gold will therefore need to respect OECD Due Diligence Guidance or equivalent due diligence schemes in order to satisfy contractual obligations. · Use of government-to-business networks to facilitate uptake of the EU 'responsible importer' certificate : National Contact Points established under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises will help raise awareness of the certification procedure established under the draft Regulation, as will the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN) · "Letters of Intent" – industry commitments : the EU will take action to provide visibility to the efforts of companies that provide letters of intent announcing relevant commitments. Policy dialogues with third countries and other stakeholders · Building on existing policy dialogues : the EU will use its political, development, trade and security dialogues and contacts with governments in mining, producing, processing and consuming countries (and has already begun in South American and Caribbean countries) to further develop a common understanding of the needs, and opportunities of conflict-free and responsible mineral extraction. · Reaching out to countries hosting smelters : the EU will engage with the countries where the majority of the world's smelters/refiners are located, notably China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Russia to promote its integrated approach and will hold an international conference on responsible sourcing of minerals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas in 2015. · A responsible sourcing chapter in raw materials dialogues : t he EU will use its raw materials dialogues inter alia with China, Japan and Mongolia, and has recently launched a raw materials dialogue with Myanmar/Burma. Development cooperation with third countries : t he key lines of intervention through which the EU may support partner countries are: · transposing the OECD Due Diligence Guidance into national due diligence frameworks and legislation; · building further capacity to implement the national due diligence frameworks ; · supporting advocacy and political dialogues in the countries concerned between local and central government authorities, civil society organisations and business operators ; · creating visibility for the actions carried out and the results achieved by the producer countries. Honest broker – raw materials diplomacy : the Commission services and the EEAS will gather and analyse data regarding multi-stakeholder initiatives. Public-private alliances will be given due consideration. EU Member States : complementary initiatives could be developed at national level in the area of consumer information and labelling and further incentives for responsible corporate behaviour created. Moreover, the Commission will encourage EU Member States to foster the uptake of OECD Due Diligence Guidance through performance clauses of procurement contracts signed by their authorities and will develop recommendations for Member State authorising officers. type: Document attached to the procedure body: ECHR
            • date: 2014-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2014:0052:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2014)0052 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
            • date: 2014-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2014:0053:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2014)0053 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
            • date: 2015-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.838 title: PE546.838 type: Committee draft report body: EP
            • date: 2015-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.796&secondRef=05 title: PE539.796 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
            • date: 2015-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.420 title: PE549.420 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
            • date: 2017-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=25604&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)309 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
            • date: 2017-05-17T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2017:158:TOC title: OJ C 158 19.05.2017, p. 0001 title: N8-0026/2017 type: For information body: EU
            • date: 2017-05-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F17&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00060/2016/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
            • date: 2015-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0111 title: COM(2014)0111 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
            events
            • date: 2014-03-05T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0111 summary: PURPOSE: to establish an EU system of self-certification for importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: t he European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: the proposal notes that international measures exist to promote responsible sourcing of minerals in areas at risk or affected by armed conflict. The two best-known were adopted in 2011 and 2010 respectively: the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Due Diligence Guidance) and Section 1502 of the United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which focuses on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nine adjoining countries. Whilst the trade of conflict minerals is very well documented in the case of the DRC, other cases abound elsewhere in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Against this background, the Commission and the High Representative have been working to develop a comprehensive EU responsible mineral sourcing framework. This work follows up a 2010 European Parliament resolution calling for the EU to legislate along the lines of US legislation as well as two Communications in 2011 and 2012 that announced the Commission's intention to explore ways of improving supply chain transparency. It should be noted that this legislative proposal is accompanied by a Communication detailing other policy measures that can be deployed to tackle the problem as broadly as possible. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission examined six options. The preferred option comprises the adoption of a Regulation establishing obligations under a 'EU Responsible Importer' certification based on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance – voluntary. CONTENT: the main objective of this proposal is to help reduce the financing of armed groups and security forces through mineral proceeds in conflict-affected and high-risk areas by supporting and further promoting responsible sourcing practices of EU companies in relation to tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold originating from such areas. The draft regulation lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-certified as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, as set out in Annex I. Self-certification as a responsible importer : a ny importer of minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation may self-certify as responsible importer by declaring to a Member State competent authority that it adheres to the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in the Regulation. The declaration shall contain documentation in which the importer confirms its adherence to the obligations including results of the independent third-party audits carried out. Member State competent authorities shall carry out appropriate ex-post checks in order to ensure that self-certified responsible importers of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation comply with their obligations. OECD Due Diligence Guidance : the Regulation relies on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance to define obligations for EU importers that opt to be self-certified as responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten ores and metals, and gold, on the basis of a self-declaration of compliance. EU importers opting for self-certification are obliged to integrate all elements of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in their management system by: (i) maintaining a system of controls and transparency over the mineral supply chain, which includes inter alia the country of mineral origin and the smelters/refiners; (ii) identifying and assessing risks in the supply chain against the OECD model supply chain policy; (iii) designing and implementing a strategy to respond to identified risks; (iv) obtaining independent third-party audit assurances of supply chain due diligence; and (v) reporting publicly on supply chain due diligence. Disclosure : the EU self-certified importer is required to disclose annually to the Member State competent authority the identity and geographical location of the smelters/refiners in its supply chain. The importer is also required to provide independent third-party audit assurances and pass them on to Member States' competent authorities and to downstream purchasers, with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns. On the basis of the information disclosed to the competent authorities, the EU will publish annually, after consultation with the OECD, a list of responsible smelters and refiners that source according to the Regulation. Infringement: in the case of infringement, competent authorities will issue a notice of remedial action to be taken by the EU importer. If such action is inadequate, the authority will then issue a non-recognition notice for the responsible importer certificate for the minerals and metals covered by the draft Regulation. Budgetary implications: the present proposal entails limited financial implications for the Union budget for administrative purposes: EUR 2.72 million for the period 2014-2018.
            • date: 2014-03-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
            • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
            • date: 2015-04-14T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
            • date: 2015-04-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0141&language=EN title: A8-0141/2015 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows: Purpose and scope : Members felt that the Regulation was one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups by means of controlling trade of minerals from conflict regions. The latter should ensure that the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation was broken . Accordingly, the objective of the Regulation was to lay down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-declared as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. Metals reasonably assumed to be recycled should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation. The definition of importers was widened to enable traders to self-certify and participate in the new system. Conformity assessment : the importer responsible for the minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation should request a notified conformity assessment body carry out a conformity assessment in accordance with a conformity assessment scheme . The Commission shall adopt an implementing act establishing one or more conformity assessment scheme(s) covering all of the responsible importer's activities, processes and systems used to implement supply chain due diligence. Member States should notify the Commission and the other Member States of bodies authorised to carry out third-party conformity assessment tasks under the Regulation. The Commission should make publicly available the list of the bodies. Members set out the requirements related to conformity assessment bodies seeking notification and also set out the obligations of notified conformity assessment bodies. A conformity assessment body should be a third-party body independent of the importer it assesses and the smelter or refiner, the smelter's or refiner's subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, suppliers and companies cooperating in the conformity assessment. Where a notified conformity assessment body found that an importer had not met requirements of the conformity assessment scheme, it should require that importer to take appropriate corrective measures and should not issue a certificate. Where corrective measures were not adopted or did not have the required effect, the assessment body should suspend or withdraw the certificate if necessary. List of responsible importers : in order to provide visibility for the efforts of companies taking on commitments in this domain, the Commission should draw up a list of responsible importers on the basis of reports on the implementation of the regulation by the Member States. The ‘European responsible importer’ label : responsible importers should be granted a ‘European responsible importer’ label by Member States’ competent authorities. The label should be suspended or withdrawn where there is non-compliance. Due diligence obligations applicable to smelters and refiners : Members proposed that the Regulation must be compulsorily applied for smelters and refiners established in the Union, who were key actors in the supply chain, as they were involved in the stage when minerals were processed. They were therefore in a better position to gather, communicate and verify information about the origin of minerals and the various operators that had been responsible for them. Establishment of a "European certification of responsibility" for companies operating downstream: companies established in the Union operating downstream of the supply chain of minerals and taking due diligence measures, might be granted a "European certification of responsibility “by the competent authorities of the Member States. Review: two years after the date of application of the Regulation and every three years thereafter, the Commission will review the functioning and effectiveness of the Regulation and the latest impact of the scheme both in the EU and on the ground. The Regulation should apply two years after its entry into force.
            • date: 2015-05-19T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150519&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
            • date: 2015-05-20T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0204 title: T8-0204/2015 summary: The European Parliament, by 402 votes to 118 with 171 abstentions, adopted amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The question was referred back to the competent committee for re-consideration and the vote was deferred to a later session. The main amendments adopted amended the Commission proposal as follows: Purpose: the Regulation was one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups by means of controlling trade of minerals from conflict regions . It reflected the need for due diligence along the entire supply chain from the sourcing site to the final product. Accordingly, all companies who first place covered resources, including products that contain those resources on the Union market must conduct and publicly report on their supply chain due diligence. Certification system : Parliament stated that the Regulation should establish the European certification of responsibility' (and not just self-certification as the Commission had proposed) regarding due diligence obligations in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold. All Union importers who source minerals and metals falling within the scope of this Regulation must conform to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. Downstream companies : these companies must take all reasonable steps to identify and address any risks arising in their supply chains for minerals and metals coming within the scope of the Regulation. In this connection, they should be required to provide information on the due diligence practices they employ for responsible supply chains. The exercise of due diligence must be tailored to the activities of the undertaking in question, its size and its position in the supply chain. The Commission may provide further guidelines on the obligations to be met by undertakings, depending on their position in the supply chain, to ensure that the system involves a flexible procedure that takes into account the position of SMEs. Verification by third-parties : certified responsible importers of smelted and refined metals shall be exempted from carrying out independent third-party audits provided they submit substantive evidence that all smelters and refiners in their supply chain conform to the provisions of the Regulation. List of responsible importers : the Commission should adopt and make publicly available a decision listing the names and addresses of responsible importers of minerals and metals within the scope of the Regulation. It must update and publish, including on the internet, the information included in the list in a timely manner. Due diligence obligations applicable to smelters and refiners : smelters and refiners established in the Union which process and import minerals and concentrates thereof would have an obligation to apply the Union system for supply chain due diligence or a due diligence system recognised as equivalent by the Commission. If there were a failure to comply with these obligations, the authorities would notify the fact to the smelter or refiner, and ask them to take corrective measures in order to comply with the European due diligence system. In the event of a persistent failure to comply, Member States competent authorities would impose penalties for the infringement. Transition period : provision should be made for a two-year transitional period to allow the Commission to set up a third-party audit system and for responsible importers to become familiar with their obligations under the Regulation. Accompanying measures : the Commission should submit a legislative proposal , as appropriate, within the transitional period setting up accompanying measures in order to enhance the effectiveness of this Regulation in line with responsible sourcing of minerals. These should cover the following: support for responsibly sourcing enterprises in the form of incentives, technical assistance and guidance to enterprises, taking into account the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises; ongoing policy dialogues with third countries; continued, targeted development cooperation with third countries , in particular aid for the marketing of non-conflict minerals; close cooperation with Member States for the launching of complementary initiatives in the area of consumer, investor and customer information. Strengthened review clause : Parliament recommended stricter monitoring of the system, with a review two years after its application and every three years thereafter (rather than three and six years respectively, as proposed by the Commission).
            • date: 2015-05-20T00:00:00 type: Matter referred back to the committee responsible body: EP
            • date: 2017-01-24T00:00:00 type: Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations body: EP
            • date: 2017-03-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170315&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
            • date: 2017-03-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25604&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
            • date: 2017-03-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0090 title: T8-0090/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 558 votes to 17, with 45 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal. Subject matter and scope : the Regulation, by controlling trade in minerals from conflict areas, is one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups . It lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold. This Regulation shall not apply to Union importers of minerals or metals, where their annual import volume of each of the minerals or metals concerned is below the volume thresholds set out in Annex I to the Regulation. All volume thresholds are set at a level that ensures that the vast majority, but no less than 95 %, of the total volumes imported into the Union of each mineral and metal under the Combined Nomenclature code is subject to the obligations of Union importers set out in this Regulation. In exercising its power to adopt delegated acts to modify existing thresholds, the Commission has undertaken to take account of the position of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises which import gold. Importers’ obligations : Union importers of minerals or metals shall comply with the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in this Regulation and shall keep documentation demonstrating their respective compliance with those obligations. Union importers of metals shall identify and assess, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance , the risks in their supply chain based on available third-party audit reports concerning the smelters and refiners in that chain, and, by assessing, as appropriate, the due diligence practices of those smelters and refiners. Union importers shall carry out audits of their own supply chain due diligence via an independent third-party unless there is evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing or amending the list of the names and addresses of global responsible smelters and refiners. Disclosure obligations : Union importers shall: (i) make available to the Member State competent authorities the reports of any third party audit carried out or evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission; (ii) make available to their immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to their supply chain due diligence: (iii) publicly report as widely as possible, including on the internet, and on an annual basis on their supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing. Certification : the amended text stipulates that governments, industry associations and groupings of interested organisations having due diligence schemes in place (‘scheme owners’) may apply to the Commission to have the supply chain due diligence schemes that are developed and overseen by them recognised by the Commission. The methodology and criteria for such schemes to be recognised as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation shall be established in a delegated act to avoid double auditing. Such schemes shall incorporate the overarching due diligence principles, ensure that requirements are aligned to the specific recommendations of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. The Commission shall establish and keep up-to-date a register of recognised supply chain due diligence schemes. It shall be made publicly available on the internet. Guidelines : in response to the European Parliament's request for specific guidelines, the Commission shall prepare non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas. By means of such guidelines, relevant companies with more than 500 employees that are required to disclose non-financial information would be encouraged to disclose specific information in relation to products containing tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold. Review clause : by 1 January 2023 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation in order assess the adequacy and implementation of these due diligence schemes and the impact of the Union system on the ground. It shall propose new mandatory measures in order to ensure sufficient leverage of the total Union market on the responsible global supply chain of minerals.
            • date: 2017-04-03T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
            • date: 2017-05-17T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
            • date: 2017-05-17T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
            • date: 2017-05-19T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to put an end to the financing of armed groups through trade in minerals from conflict areas. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. CONTENT: human rights abuses are common in resource-rich conflict-affected and high-risk areas and may include child labour, sexual violence, the disappearance of people, forced resettlement and the destruction of ritually or culturally significant sites. Purpose and scope : this Regulation establishes a Union system for supply chain due diligence in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold. At least 95% of all EU imports of metals and minerals will be covered, while small volume importers will be exempt. The Regulation builds upon 2011 OECD guidelines which set the international benchmark for supply chain due diligence. Importers’ obligations : this Regulation obliges EU companies to source their imports of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold responsibly and to ensure that their supply chains do not contribute to funding armed conflict. To this end, it lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold. Union importers of minerals shall : identify and assess the risks of adverse impacts in their mineral supply chain on the basis of the information provided by independent third-party audits of the smelters and refiners in the supply chain; implement a strategy to respond to the identified risks; provide the competent authorities of the Member State with evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission; make available to their immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to their supply chain due diligence; prepare a report , on an annual basis, on their supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing. The competent authorities shall carry out checks to ensure that EU importers of minerals and metals comply with their due diligence obligations. Certification : governments, industry associations and groupings of interested organisations having due diligence schemes in place may apply to the Commission to have the supply chain due diligence schemes that are developed and overseen by them recognised by the Commission. The Commission shall establish and keep up-to-date a register of recognised supply chain due diligence schemes. That register shall be made publicly available on the internet. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing or amending the list of the names and addresses of global responsible smelters and refiners . Guidelines : the Commission, in consultation with the European External Action Service and the OECD, shall prepare non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Review clause : by 1 January 2023 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and the effectiveness of the Union system, and its impact on the ground as regards the promotion of responsible sourcing of the minerals falling within the scope of this Regulation from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and on Union economic operators including SMEs. It shall propose new mandatory measures in order to ensure sufficient leverage of the total Union market on the responsible global supply chain of minerals. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 8.6.2017. APPLICATION: from 9.7.2017. Rules relating to due diligence shall apply as from 1.1.2021. DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delegated acts for the amendment of Annex I to the Regulation by establishing and amending the volume thresholds of minerals and metals falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2017/821 according to the Combined Nomenclature. The power to adopt such acts shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years (renewable) from 8 June 2017. The European Parliament or the Council shall have the right to object to a delegated act within a period of two months (extendable for two months) from the notification of the act. docs: title: Regulation 2017/821 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0821 title: OJ L 130 19.05.2017, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:130:TOC
            other
            • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
            procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
            Old
            INTA/8/00381
            New
            • INTA/8/00381
            procedure/final/url
            Old
            http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0821
            New
            https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0821
            procedure/instrument
            Old
            Regulation
            New
            • Regulation
            • See also 2018/2542(RSP) See also 2018/2557(RSP)
            procedure/subject
            Old
            • 3.40.16 Raw materials
            • 6.10.05 Peace preservation, humanitarian and rescue tasks, crisis management
            • 6.20.02 Export/import control, trade defence
            • 6.30 Development cooperation
            New
            3.40.16
            Raw materials
            6.10.05
            Peace preservation, humanitarian and rescue tasks, crisis management
            6.20.02
            Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
            6.30
            Development cooperation
            activities/16
            date
            2017-05-19T00:00:00
            docs
            type
            Final act published in Official Journal
            procedure/final
            url
            http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0821
            title
            Regulation 2017/821
            procedure/stage_reached
            Old
            Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
            New
            Procedure completed
            procedure/title
            Old
            Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas
            New
            Supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas
            activities/15
            date
            2017-05-17T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            End of procedure in Parliament
            activities/14
            date
            2017-05-17T00:00:00
            body
            CSL
            type
            Final act signed
            procedure/stage_reached
            Old
            Awaiting signature of act
            New
            Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
            activities/12
            date
            2017-04-03T00:00:00
            body
            CSL
            type
            Council Meeting
            council
            Agriculture and Fisheries
            meeting_id
            3529
            activities/13
            date
            2017-04-03T00:00:00
            body
            EP/CSL
            type
            Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
            procedure/stage_reached
            Old
            Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
            New
            Awaiting signature of act
            activities/11/docs/0/text
            • The European Parliament adopted by 558 votes to 17, with 45 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

              Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal.

              Subject matter and scope: the Regulation, by controlling trade in minerals from conflict areas, is one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups. It lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold.

              This Regulation shall not apply to Union importers of minerals or metals, where their annual import volume of each of the minerals or metals concerned is below the volume thresholds set out in Annex I to the Regulation.

              All volume thresholds are set at a level that ensures that the vast majority, but no less than 95 %, of the total volumes imported into the Union of each mineral and metal under the Combined Nomenclature code is subject to the obligations of Union importers set out in this Regulation.

              In exercising its power to adopt delegated acts to modify existing thresholds, the Commission has undertaken to take account of the position of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises which import gold.

              Importers’ obligations: Union importers of minerals or metals shall comply with the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in this Regulation and shall keep documentation demonstrating their respective compliance with those obligations.

              Union importers of metals shall identify and assess, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, the risks in their supply chain based on available third-party audit reports concerning the smelters and refiners in that chain, and, by assessing, as appropriate, the due diligence practices of those smelters and refiners.

              Union importers shall carry out audits of their own supply chain due diligence via an independent third-party unless there is evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission.

              The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing or amending the list of the names and addresses of global responsible smelters and refiners.

              Disclosure obligations: Union importers shall: (i) make available to the Member State competent authorities the reports of any third party audit carried out or evidence of conformity with a supply chain due diligence scheme recognised by the Commission; (ii) make available to their immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to their supply chain due diligence: (iii) publicly report as widely as possible, including on the internet, and on an annual basis on their supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing.

              Certification: the amended text stipulates that governments, industry associations and groupings of interested organisations having due diligence schemes in place (‘scheme owners’) may apply to the Commission to have the supply chain due diligence schemes that are developed and overseen by them recognised by the Commission.

              The methodology and criteria for such schemes to be recognised as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation shall be established in a delegated act to avoid double auditing. Such schemes shall incorporate the overarching due diligence principles, ensure that requirements are aligned to the specific recommendations of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.

              The Commission shall establish and keep up-to-date a register of recognised supply chain due diligence schemes. It shall be made publicly available on the internet.

              Guidelines: in response to the European Parliament's request for specific guidelines, the Commission shall prepare non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

              By means of such guidelines, relevant companies with more than 500 employees that are required to disclose non-financial information would be encouraged to disclose specific information in relation to products containing tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold.

              Review clause: by 1 January 2023 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation in order assess the adequacy and implementation of these due diligence schemes and the impact of the Union system on the ground. It shall propose new mandatory measures in order to ensure sufficient leverage of the total Union market on the responsible global supply chain of minerals.

            activities/11/docs
            • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0090 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0090/2017
            activities/11/type
            Old
            Vote in plenary scheduled
            New
            Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
            procedure/stage_reached
            Old
            Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
            New
            Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
            activities/10/docs
            • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170315&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
            activities/10/type
            Old
            Debate in plenary scheduled
            New
            Debate in Parliament
            activities/9
            date
            2017-01-24T00:00:00
            body
            unknown
            type
            Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
            activities/11
            date
            2017-03-16T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Vote in plenary scheduled
            activities/9
            date
            2017-03-15T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Debate in plenary scheduled
            activities/0/commission/0/DG/url
            Old
            http://ec.europa.eu/trade/
            New
            http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en
            other/0/dg/url
            Old
            http://ec.europa.eu/trade/
            New
            http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en
            activities/0/docs/0/celexid
            CELEX:52014PC0111:EN
            activities/6
            date
            2015-05-20T00:00:00
            body
            unknown
            type
            Matter referred back to the committee responsible
            activities/7/docs/0
            url
            http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25604&l=en
            type
            Results of vote in Parliament
            title
            Results of vote in Parliament
            activities/7/type
            Old
            Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
            New
            Results of vote in Parliament
            activities/8
            date
            2015-07-14T00:00:00
            body
            unknown
            type
            Opening of interinstitutional negotiations with the report amended in plenary
            activities/0/docs/0/celexid
            CELEX:52014PC0111:EN
            activities/0/docs/0/celexid
            CELEX:52014PC0111:EN
            activities/0/docs/0/celexid
            CELEX:52014PC0111:EN
            activities/6/docs/0/text
            • The European Parliament, by 402 votes to 118 with 171 abstentions, adopted amendments to

              the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

              The question was referred back to the competent committee for re-consideration and the vote was deferred to a later session.

              The main amendments adopted amended the Commission proposal as follows:

              Purpose: the Regulation was one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups by means of controlling trade of minerals from conflict regions. It reflected the need for due diligence along the entire supply chain from the sourcing site to the final product.

              Accordingly, all companies who first place covered resources, including products that contain those resources on the Union market must conduct and publicly report on their supply chain due diligence.

              Certification system: Parliament stated that the Regulation should establish the European certification of responsibility' (and not just self-certification as the Commission had proposed) regarding due diligence obligations in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold. 

              All Union importers who source minerals and metals falling within the scope of this Regulation must conform to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. 

              Downstream companies: these companies must take all reasonable steps to identify and address any risks arising in their supply chains for minerals and metals coming within the scope of the Regulation. In this connection, they should be required to provide information on the due diligence practices they employ for responsible supply chains. The exercise of due diligence must be tailored to the activities of the undertaking in question, its size and its position in the supply chain. The Commission may provide further guidelines on the obligations to be met by undertakings, depending on their position in the supply chain, to ensure that the system involves a flexible procedure that takes into account the position of SMEs.

              Verification by third-parties: certified responsible importers of smelted and refined metals shall be exempted from carrying out independent third-party audits provided they submit substantive evidence that all smelters and refiners in their supply chain conform to the provisions of the Regulation.

              List of responsible importers: the Commission should adopt and make publicly available a decision listing the names and addresses of responsible importers of minerals and metals within the scope of the Regulation. It must update and publish, including on the internet, the information included in the list in a timely manner. 

              Due diligence obligations applicable to smelters and refiners: smelters and refiners established in the Union which process and import minerals and concentrates thereof would have an obligation to apply the Union system for supply chain due diligence or a due diligence system recognised as equivalent by the Commission. If there were a failure to comply with these obligations, the authorities would notify the fact to the smelter or refiner, and ask them to take corrective measures in order to comply with the European due diligence system. 

              In the event of a persistent failure to comply, Member States competent authorities would impose penalties for the infringement.

              Transition period: provision should be made for a two-year transitional period to allow the Commission to set up a third-party audit system and for responsible importers to become familiar with their obligations under the Regulation.

              Accompanying measures: the Commission should submit a legislative proposal, as appropriate, within the transitional period setting up accompanying measures in order to enhance the effectiveness of this Regulation in line with responsible sourcing of minerals. These should cover the following:

              • support for responsibly sourcing enterprises in the form of incentives, technical assistance and guidance to enterprises, taking into account the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises;
              • ongoing policy dialogues with third countries;
              • continued, targeted development cooperation with third countries, in particular aid for the marketing of non-conflict minerals; 
              • close cooperation with Member States for the launching of complementary initiatives in the area of consumer, investor and customer information.

              Strengthened review clause: Parliament recommended stricter monitoring of the system, with a review two years after its application and every three years thereafter (rather than three and six years respectively, as proposed by the Commission).

            links/European Commission/title
            Old
            PreLex
            New
            EUR-Lex
            activities/5/docs
            • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150519&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
            activities/5/type
            Old
            Debate in plenary scheduled
            New
            Debate in Parliament
            activities/6/docs
            • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0204 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0204/2015
            activities/6/type
            Old
            Vote in plenary scheduled
            New
            Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
            activities/6
            date
            2015-05-20T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Vote in plenary scheduled
            activities/4/docs/0/text
            • The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas.

              The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:

              Purpose and scope: Members felt that the Regulation was one of the ways of eliminating the financing of armed groups by means of controlling trade of minerals from conflict regions. The latter should ensure that the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation was broken.

              Accordingly, the objective of the Regulation was to lay down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-declared as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. Metals reasonably assumed to be recycled should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.

              The definition of importers was widened to enable traders to self-certify and participate in the new system.

              Conformity assessment: the importer responsible for the minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation should request a notified conformity assessment body carry out a conformity assessment in accordance with a conformity assessment scheme.

              The Commission shall adopt an implementing act establishing one or more conformity assessment scheme(s) covering all of the responsible importer's activities, processes and systems used to implement supply chain due diligence.

              Member States should notify the Commission and the other Member States of bodies authorised to carry out third-party conformity assessment tasks under the Regulation. The Commission should make publicly available the list of the bodies.

              Members set out the requirements related to conformity assessment bodies seeking notification and also set out the obligations of notified conformity assessment bodies.

              A conformity assessment body should be a third-party body independent of the importer it assesses and the smelter or refiner, the smelter's or refiner's subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, suppliers and companies cooperating in the conformity assessment.

              Where a notified conformity assessment body found that an importer had not met requirements of the conformity assessment scheme, it should require that importer to take appropriate corrective measures and should not issue a certificate.

              Where corrective measures were not adopted or did not have the required effect, the assessment body should suspend or withdraw the certificate if necessary.

              List of responsible importers: in order to provide visibility for the efforts of companies taking on commitments in this domain, the Commission should draw up a list of responsible importers on the basis of reports on the implementation of the regulation by the Member States.

              The ‘European responsible importer’ label: responsible importers should be granted a ‘European responsible importer’ label by Member States’ competent authorities. The label should be suspended or withdrawn where there is non-compliance.

              Due diligence obligations applicable to smelters and refiners: Members proposed that the Regulation must be compulsorily applied for smelters and refiners established in the Union, who were key actors in the supply chain, as they were involved in the stage when minerals were processed. They were therefore in a better position to gather, communicate and verify information about the origin of minerals and the various operators that had been responsible for them.

              Establishment of a "European certification of responsibility" for companies operating downstream: companies established in the Union operating downstream of the supply chain of minerals and taking due diligence measures, might be granted a "European certification of responsibility “by the competent authorities of the Member States.

              Review: two years after the date of application of the Regulation and every three years thereafter, the Commission will review the functioning and effectiveness of the Regulation and the latest impact of the scheme both in the EU and on the ground.

              The Regulation should apply two years after its entry into force.

            activities/4/docs
            • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0141&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0141/2015
            activities/5/type
            Old
            Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
            New
            Debate in plenary scheduled
            activities/1/committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            activities/2/committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            activities/3/committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            activities/4
            date
            2015-04-24T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
            committees
            committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            procedure/stage_reached
            Old
            Awaiting committee decision
            New
            Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
            activities/3
            date
            2015-04-14T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
            committees
            activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner
            Old
            DE GUCHT Karel
            New
            MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
            activities/3
            date
            2015-05-19T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
            other/0/commissioner
            Old
            DE GUCHT Karel
            New
            MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
            activities/1/committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            activities/2/committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            committees/0
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            AFET
            date
            2014-12-08T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Foreign Affairs
            rapporteur
            group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
            activities/1/committees/4/shadows/3
            group
            GUE/NGL
            name
            SCHOLZ Helmut
            activities/2/committees/4/shadows/3
            group
            GUE/NGL
            name
            SCHOLZ Helmut
            committees/4/shadows/3
            group
            GUE/NGL
            name
            SCHOLZ Helmut
            activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
            Old
            545fcae2d1d1c51913000000
            New
            4f1ac795b819f25efd000096
            activities/2/committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
            Old
            545fcae2d1d1c51913000000
            New
            4f1ac795b819f25efd000096
            committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
            Old
            545fcae2d1d1c51913000000
            New
            4f1ac795b819f25efd000096
            activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
            545fcae2d1d1c51913000000
            activities/2/committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
            545fcae2d1d1c51913000000
            committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
            545fcae2d1d1c51913000000
            activities/1/committees/2
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            2014-09-29T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Development
            rapporteur
            group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon
            activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1
            group
            ECR
            name
            MCCLARKIN Emma
            activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2
            group
            ALDE
            name
            DE SARNEZ Marielle
            activities/2
            date
            2014-10-20T00:00:00
            body
            EP
            type
            Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
            committees
            committees/2
            body
            EP
            responsible
            False
            committee
            DEVE
            date
            2014-09-29T00:00:00
            committee_full
            Development
            rapporteur
            group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon
            committees/4/shadows/1
            group
            ECR
            name
            MCCLARKIN Emma
            committees/4/shadows/2
            group
            ALDE
            name
            DE SARNEZ Marielle
            activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0
            group
            S&D
            name
            ARENA Maria
            committees/3/shadows/0
            group
            S&D
            name
            ARENA Maria
            activities/1/committees/3/date
            2014-09-03T00:00:00
            activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur
            • group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu
            activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0
            group
            Verts/ALE
            name
            KELLER Ska
            committees/3/date
            2014-09-03T00:00:00
            committees/3/rapporteur
            • group: EPP name: WINKLER Iuliu
            committees/3/shadows/0
            group
            Verts/ALE
            name
            KELLER Ska
            activities/1/committees/3
            body
            EP
            shadows
            group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
            responsible
            True
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            committees/3
            body
            EP
            shadows
            group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
            responsible
            True
            committee_full
            International Trade
            committee
            INTA
            procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
            Old
            INTA/7/15402
            New
            INTA/8/00381
            activities/0/commission/0
            DG
            Commissioner
            DE GUCHT Karel
            other/0
            body
            EC
            dg
            commissioner
            DE GUCHT Karel
            activities/0/docs/0/text
            • PURPOSE: to establish an EU system of self-certification for importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold.

              PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

              ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

              BACKGROUND: the proposal notes that international measures exist to promote responsible sourcing of minerals in areas at risk or affected by armed conflict. The two best-known were adopted in 2011 and 2010 respectively: the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Due Diligence Guidance) and Section 1502 of the United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which focuses on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nine adjoining countries.

              Whilst the trade of conflict minerals is very well documented in the case of the DRC, other cases abound elsewhere in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Against this background, the Commission and the High Representative have been working to develop a comprehensive EU responsible mineral sourcing framework. This work follows up a 2010 European Parliament resolution calling for the EU to legislate along the lines of US legislation as well as two Communications in 2011 and 2012 that announced the Commission's intention to explore ways of improving supply chain transparency.

              It should be noted that this legislative proposal is accompanied by a Communication detailing other policy measures that can be deployed to tackle the problem as broadly as possible.

              IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission examined six options. The preferred option comprises the adoption of a Regulation establishing obligations under a 'EU Responsible Importer' certification based on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance – voluntary.

              CONTENT: the main objective of this proposal is to help reduce the financing of armed groups and security forces through mineral proceeds in conflict-affected and high-risk areas by supporting and further promoting responsible sourcing practices of EU companies in relation to tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold originating from such areas.

              The draft regulation lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-certified as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, as set out in Annex I.

              Self-certification as a responsible importer : any importer of minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation may self-certify as responsible importer by declaring to a Member State competent authority that it adheres to the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in the Regulation. The declaration shall contain documentation in which the importer confirms its adherence to the obligations including results of the independent third-party audits carried out.

              Member State competent authorities shall carry out appropriate ex-post checks in order to ensure that self-certified responsible importers of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation comply with their obligations.

              OECD Due Diligence Guidance: the Regulation relies on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance to define obligations for EU importers that opt to be self-certified as responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten ores and metals, and gold, on the basis of a self-declaration of compliance.

              EU importers opting for self-certification are obliged to integrate all elements of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in their management system by: (i) maintaining a system of controls and transparency over the mineral supply chain, which includes inter alia the country of mineral origin and the smelters/refiners; (ii) identifying and assessing risks in the supply chain against the OECD model supply chain policy; (iii) designing and implementing a strategy to respond to identified risks; (iv) obtaining independent third-party audit assurances of supply chain due diligence; and (v) reporting publicly on supply chain due diligence.

              Disclosure: the EU self-certified importer is required to disclose annually to the Member State competent authority the identity and geographical location of the smelters/refiners in its supply chain.

              The importer is also required to provide independent third-party audit assurances and pass them on to Member States' competent authorities and to downstream purchasers, with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns.

              On the basis of the information disclosed to the competent authorities, the EU will publish annually, after consultation with the OECD, a list of responsible smelters and refiners that source according to the Regulation.

              Infringement: in the case of infringement, competent authorities will issue a notice of remedial action to be taken by the EU importer. If such action is inadequate, the authority will then issue a non-recognition notice for the responsible importer certificate for the minerals and metals covered by the draft Regulation.

              Budgetary implications: the present proposal entails limited financial implications for the Union budget for administrative purposes: EUR 2.72 million for the period 2014-2018.

            activities/0/docs/0/url
            Old
            http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111
            New
            http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111
            activities/0/docs/0/url
            Old
            http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111
            New
            http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111
            activities
            • date: 2014-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0111 title: COM(2014)0111 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52014PC0111:EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
            • date: 2014-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
            committees
            • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
            • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
            • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
            • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
            • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
            links
            European Commission
            other
              procedure
              dossier_of_the_committee
              INTA/7/15402
              reference
              2014/0059(COD)
              subtype
              Legislation
              legal_basis
              Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 207
              stage_reached
              Awaiting committee decision
              instrument
              Regulation
              title
              Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas
              type
              COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
              subject