Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | HAYES Brian ( PPE) | TANG Paul ( S&D), FOX Ashley ( ECR), IN 'T VELD Sophia ( ALDE), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD) |
Former Responsible Committee | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | LENAERS Jeroen ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM | PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Former Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | FEMM | Viorica DĂNCILĂ ( S&D), Arne GERICKE ( ECR) | |
Committee Recast Technique Opinion | JURI | SVOBODA Pavel ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to establish an EU legal framework for institutions for occupational retirement provision.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive (EU) 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs).
CONTENT: this Directive is a recast of Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision. It lays down rules for the taking-up and pursuit of activities carried out by institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) . They are a vital part of the Union economy, holding assets worth EUR 2.5 trillion on behalf of around 75 million members and beneficiaries.
This Directive is aimed at minimum harmonisation and therefore should not preclude Member States from maintaining or introducing further provisions in order to protect members and beneficiaries of occupational pension schemes.
Revising directive 2003/41/EC, the text has four specific objectives:
1. Clarifying procedures for cross-border activities : the Directive provides that Member States shall authorise IORPs registered or authorised in their territory:
to engage in cross-border activity . An IORP intending to engage in cross-border activity should be subject to the prior approval of the relevant competent authority of its home Member State; to transfer pension schemes to other IORPs across borders within the Union in order to facilitate the organisation of occupational retirement provision on a Union scale. Transfers should be subject to authorisation by the competent authority in the home Member State of the receiving IORP after that competent authority has received the consent of the competent authority of the home Member State of the IORP transferring the pension scheme.
Every IORP shall have: (i) sufficient and appropriate assets at all times to cover the technical provisions in respect of the total range of pension schemes operated; (ii) an adequate available solvency margin in respect of its entire business at all times which is at least equal to the requirements in this Directive in order to ensure long-term sustainability of occupational retirement provision.
2. Ensuring good governance and risk management : the IORPs shall:
put in place an effective system of governance which provides for sound and prudent management of their activities. The system of governance shall include consideration of environmental, social and governance factors related to investment assets in investment decisions; ensure that all persons who manage IORPs have the adequate professional qualifications and requirements for fit and proper management; establish and apply a sound remuneration policy in line with the long-term interests of members and beneficiaries of pension schemes operated by the IORP and shall include measures aimed at avoiding conflicts of interest and shall not encourage risk-taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles and rules of the IORP; put in place a risk-management function, an internal audit function and, where applicable, an actuarial function; in the case of an occupational pension scheme where members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk, the home Member State may require the IORP to appoint one or more depositaries for the safe-keeping of assets and oversight duties.
3. Providing clear and relevant information to members and beneficiaries : the Directive places an obligation on IORPs to:
provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries including: (i) accrued pension entitlements; (ii) information on the investment profile (iii) the nature of investment risks; (iv) the options available to members and beneficiaries in receiving their retirement benefits; provide, every twelve months, a pension benefit statement (PBS) for the individual in the clearest possible way, also as a basis to feed information into a potential pension tracking service. The Pension Benefit Statement should be clear and comprehensive and should contain relevant and appropriate information to facilitate the understanding of pension entitlements over time and across schemes and serve labour mobility. It should provide information on pension benefit projections based on the retirement age.
4. Ensuring that supervisors have the necessary tools to effectively supervise IORPs : the Directive lays down that the competent authorities of the home Member State shall be responsible for the prudential supervision of IORPs. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities may impose administrative sanctions and other measures applicable to all infringements of the national provisions implementing this Directive. Supervision of IORPs shall be prospective and risk-based . It shall comprise an appropriate combination of off-site activities and on-site inspections.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 12.1.2017.
TRANSPOSITION: 13.1.2019 at the latest.
The European Parliament adopted by 512 to 70, with 40 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (recast).
Parliament’s position, adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure, amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Subject matter and scope : IORPs play an important role in the long-term financing of the Union’s economy and in the provision of secure retirement benefits. They are a vital part of the Union economy , holding assets worth EUR 2.5 trillion on behalf of around 75 million members and beneficiaries.
In the internal market, institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) should have the possibility to operate in other Member States while ensuring a high level of protection and security for members and beneficiaries of occupational pension schemes.
This Directive is aimed at minimum harmonisation and therefore should not preclude Member States from maintaining or introducing further provisions in order to protect members and beneficiaries of occupational pension schemes, provided that such provisions are consistent with Member States' obligations under Union law. This Directive does not concern issues of national social, labour, tax or contract law, or the adequacy of pension provision in Member States.
Registration or authorisation : Member States shall, in respect of every IORP, the main administration of which is located in their territories, ensure that the IORP is registered in a national register, or authorised , by the competent authority. The location of the main administration refers to the place where the main strategic decisions of an IORP are made.
Member States may provide that additional benefits such as the option of longevity and disability cover, provision for surviving dependants and a guarantee of repayment of contributions are offered to members with the agreement of the employers and the employees or their respective representatives.
Transfers of pension schemes :
in the case of a transfer of part of a pension scheme, the viability of both the transferred part and the remaining part of the pension scheme should be ensured and the rights of all members and beneficiaries should be adequately protected after the transfer, by requiring both the transferring and the receiving IORPs to have sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions for the transferred part and the remaining part of the scheme; the transfer and its conditions should be subject to prior approval by a majority of the members and a majority of the beneficiaries concerned or where applicable, by a majority of their representatives, such as the trustees of a trust-based scheme; the transfer of all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, between transferring and receiving IORPs shall be subject to authorisation by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP after obtaining the prior consent of the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP; the transfer of all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, between transferring and receiving IORPs shall be subject to authorisation by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP after obtaining the prior consent of the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP; in the event of a whole or partial cross-border transfer of a pension scheme, where there is a disagreement between the competent authorities concerned, it should be possible for the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) to carry out mediation.
Governance systems :
the system of governance shall include consideration of environmental, social and governance factors related to investment assets in investment decisions, and shall be subject to regular internal review. Member States shall ensure that IORPs establish and apply written policies in relation to risk management, internal audit and, where relevant, actuarial and outsourced activities; persons who effectively run an IORP should collectively be fit and proper and persons who carry out key functions (the actuarial or internal audits, etc) should have adequate knowledge and experience and, where applicable, adequate professional qualifications.
Remuneration policy : Member States shall require IORPs to establish and apply a sound remuneration policy for all those persons who effectively run the IORP, carry out key functions and other categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the IORP in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities.
The remuneration policy shall comply with the following principles:
be in line with the long-term interests of members and beneficiaries of pension schemes operated by the IORP; be consistent with sound and effective risk management and shall not encourage risk-taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles; it shall include measures aimed at avoiding conflicts of interest.
Outsourcing : IORPs should be allowed to entrust any activity, including key functions, in whole or in part, to service providers operating on their behalf. IORPs should remain fully responsible for discharging all of their obligations under this Directive when they outsource key functions or any other activities. IORPs should enter into a written agreement with the service provider when outsourcing any activity.
Information on the pension scheme : Member States shall, in respect of every IORP registered or authorised in their territories, ensure that members and beneficiaries are sufficiently informed about the respective pension scheme operated by the IORP, in particular concerning:
information on the investment profile ; the nature of financial risks borne by the members and beneficiaries; the conditions regarding full or partial guarantees under the pension scheme; the mechanisms protecting accrued entitlements or the benefit reduction mechanisms; where members bear investment risk or can take investment decisions, information on the past performance of investments related to the pension scheme for a minimum of five years; the options available to members and beneficiaries in receiving their retirement benefits; further information about the arrangements relating to such a transfer.
Where prospective members do not have a choice and are automatically enrolled in a pension scheme, the IORP should provide them with the key relevant information about their membership promptly after enrolment.
Pension Benefit Statement : the Pension Benefit Statement should be clear and comprehensive and should contain relevant and appropriate information to facilitate the understanding of pension entitlements over time and across schemes and serve labour mobility.
The Statement should provide information on pension benefit projections based on the retirement age. If the pension benefit projections are based on economic scenarios, that information shall also include a best estimate scenario and an unfavourable scenario, taking into consideration the specific nature of the pension scheme.
Prudential supervision : Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities may impose administrative sanctions and other measures applicable to all infringements of the national provisions implementing this Directive, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Administrative sanctions and other measures are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Brian HAYES (EPP, IE) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (recast).
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position, adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure, should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose and scope : Members stressed that institutions for occupational retirement provision play an important role in the long-term financing of the Union’s economy and in providing secure retirement benefits for citizens of the Union. Member States should take into account the objective for all institutions of ensuring the intergenerational balance of occupational pension schemes, by aiming to have an equitable spread of risks and benefits between generations .
This Directive aims to provide for minimum harmonisation and should not preclude Member States from maintaining or introducing further provisions in order to protect members and beneficiaries, provided that such provisions are consistent with Member States' obligations under Union law. The Directive does not concern issues of national social, labour, tax , and contract law, nor the adequacy of pension provisions in Member States,.
The Directive shall:
encourage Member States to build up safe and adequate occupational pension provision and facilitate cross-border activity; ensure good governance, provision of information to scheme members, transparency and safety of occupational retirement provision; facilitate the development of new and innovative pension products within collective systems which aim to guarantee adequate retirement provisions for all; clarify the procedures enabling institutions to carry out cross-border activity and remove unnecessary obstacles, which hamper such cross-border activity.
Registration or authorisation : Member States shall, in respect of every institution located in their territories, ensure that the institution is registered in a national register, or authorised, by the competent authority. The location of the main administration refers to the place where the main strategic decisions of an institution are made. Member States shall require an institution to have its main administration in the same Member State as its registered office.
Transfers of pension schemes : according to the amended text, Member States shall allow institutions authorised or registered in their territories to transfer all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, other obligations and rights and corresponding assets, and cash equivalent thereof, to a receiving institution. In the event of a transfer of part of a pension scheme, Member States shall require the transferring and the receiving institution to have sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions for the transferred part and the remaining part of the scheme.
The transfer and its conditions shall be made subject to prior approval by a majority of members and a majority of the beneficiaries concerned or, where applicable, by a majority of their representatives. Members stated that the application for authorisation of the transfer shall be submitted by the receiving institution.
Duty of Care : where a cross-border transfer has been approved by members and beneficiaries of a pension scheme and where the transferring institution provides cover against biometric risks or guarantees either an investment performance or a given level of benefits, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) shall, at the request of the competent authorities of the home Member State of the transferring institution, assess: (i) whether there could be any systemic risk to the Union financial system arising from the transfer and, (ii) whether the long-term interests of members and beneficiaries are negatively affected if the scheme were to be operated in the home Member State of the receiving institution.
System of governance : institutions shall establish and apply written policies in relation to risk management and internal audit. Those written policies shall be subject to prior approval by the management or supervisory body of the institution and shall be reviewed at least every three years.
Persons who effectively run the institution should collectively be fit and proper and persons who perform key functions should have adequate professional qualifications, knowledge and experience . However, only the key function holders should be subject to notification requirements to the competent authority.
Member States shall require institutions to establish and apply a sound remuneration policy for all those persons who effectively run the institution, perform key functions and other categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the institution.
The remuneration policy is in line with the risk profile and the long-term interests of members and beneficiaries of pension schemes operated by the institution.
Member States should be able to authorise the institution to conduct key functions through the same person or through an organisational unit provided that no conflict of interest exists and the institution has adequate measures to address and prevent any conflict of interest.
Information to be given to prospective members, members and beneficiaries : in order to protect members and beneficiaries, institutions for occupational retirement provision should limit their activities, and those arising therefrom, to those referred to in this Directive and provide clear and relevant information to members and beneficiaries for the purpose of ensuring good governance and risk management.
Where prospective members do not have a choice and are automatically enrolled in a pension scheme, the institution should provide them with the key relevant information about their membership immediately after enrolment.
Beneficiaries shall also be informed of any potential reduction in the level of benefits due, prior to any decision on such a potential reduction.
Member States shall ensure that members are sufficiently informed of the conditions of the pension scheme, in particular concerning the risks borne by members and beneficiaries associated with the pension scheme.
Pension benefit statement : institutions shall be required to draw up a concise document containing key relevant information for each member . The pension benefit statement should be clear and comprehensible and should contain relevant and appropriate information to facilitate the understanding of pension entitlements over time and across schemes and serve labour mobility. The information contained in the pension benefit statement shall be accurate, and updated and sent to each member, free of charge, at least annually.
Prudential supervision : Member States shall lay down rules on administrative penalties and other administrative measures applicable to all infringements of the national provisions transposing this Directive.
The competent authority shall publish without undue delay any administrative penalty or other administrative measure that has been imposed for an infringement of the national provisions transposing this Directive, and against which no appeal was lodged in time, including information on the type and nature of the infringement and the identity of persons held responsible.
It is stipulated that Articles 66 (professional secrecy) and 67 (use of confidential information) shall be without prejudice to the powers of investigation conferred on the European Parliament.
Closing the gender pension gap : taking into account that the gender pension gap in the Union is 39 % on average, the Commission should study extensively the impact of different pillars, pensions systems and their structures on both women and men. Based on the results, the Commission should propose actions and possible structural changes that are needed in order to ensure equal levels of pensions for women and men across the Member States.
PURPOSE: to facilitate the development of occupational retirement savings.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: European society is ageing. Pension systems across the European Union (EU) have to adapt in order to ensure adequate, safe and sustainable pensions.
The institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) sector is being developed in many Member States where occupational pensions so far play a limited role, including by setting up regulatory frameworks. Failing to provide an up-to-date EU regulatory framework now entails the risk that Member States continue to develop diverging solutions, thereby exacerbating regulatory fragmentation. Furthermore, improvements to the performance of occupational pensions require long periods of time to materialise.
According to the Commission, a revision of Directive 2003/41/EC on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision is necessary for the following reasons:
(1) protect members and beneficiaries , and facilitate safe cross-border provisioning through higher governance standards reflecting best practices at national level following the economic and financial crisis;
(2) reduce the obstacles to develop cross border occupational pensions markets, which would help companies, including SMEs and multinationals, to organise their pension provision on a European scale more efficiently;
(3) there is evidence of significant gaps in the level of information provided to scheme members and beneficiaries across the EU.
This proposal builds on a number of initiatives launched in recent years such as the White Paper on pensions and the Green Paper on long-term financing of the European economy.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: this proposal is accompanied by an impact assessment report that considers a range of policy options and sub-options. The report was first submitted to the Impact Assessment Board on 4 September 2013. The Board asked for resubmission with additional information on the views of the different stakeholder groups, problem definition, subsidiarity and proportionality aspects, options and expected impacts.
The impact assessment was resubmitted on 16 October 2013. On 6 November the Board stated it could not issue a positive opinion and requested some further amendments.
CONTENT: this proposal to recast Directive 2003/41/EC has four specific objectives:
1. Removing remaining prudential barriers for cross-border IORPs , notably by:
requiring that the rules on investment and disclosure of information to members and beneficiaries are those of the home Member State, clarifying procedures for cross-border activities, clearly defining the scope of action of home and host Member State.
2. Ensuring good governance and risk management : the proposal: (i) establishes that institutions need to have in place an effective system of governance which provides for sound and prudent management of their activities; (ii) sets out that institutions must have a sound remuneration policy; (iii) provides for an effective internal audit function which evaluates the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system; (iv) sets out that IORPs need to appoint a single depositary for safekeeping of assets and oversight duties if members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk.
3. Providing clear and relevant information to members and beneficiaries : the proposal places an obligation on IORPs to provide, every twelve months, a pension benefit statement (‘PBS’) for the individual in the clearest possible way, also as a basis to feed information into a potential pension tracking service.
4. Ensuring that supervisors have the necessary tools to effectively supervise IORPs : the proposal lays down that the competent authority of the home Member State has the sole responsibility for the prudential supervision of all IORPs authorised or registered in its jurisdiction. It establishes the principle that supervision of IORPs needs to be prospective and risk-based, as well as timely and proportionate. In addition, the proposal introduces the supervisory review process which aims to identify IORPs with financial, organisational or other features susceptible to producing a higher risk profile.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the budgetary implications relate to tasks allocated to European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).
No new resources will be needed. Operation appropriations which are necessary for the implementation of this initiative will be covered by redeployment within the contribution granted to EIOPA during the annual budgetary procedure, in accordance with the financial programming set by the Communication from the Commission "Programming of human and financial resources for decentralised agencies 2014-2020". The estimated impact on expenditure is EUR 2.035 million for the period 2015-2020.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)8
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2016/2341
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 354 23.12.2016, p. 0037
- Draft final act: 00035/2016/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0448/2016
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE604.785
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0011/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE569.481
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE567.843
- Committee draft report: PE565.015
- Committee opinion: PE541.293
- Committee opinion: PE549.448
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Opinion on the recast technique: PE536.213
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2354/2014
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2014)0167
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2014)0102
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2014)0103
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2014)0104
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex COM(2014)0167
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2014)0102
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2014)0103
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2014)0104
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2354/2014
- Opinion on the recast technique: PE536.213
- Committee opinion: PE549.448
- Committee opinion: PE541.293
- Committee draft report: PE565.015
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE567.843
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE569.481
- Draft final act: 00035/2016/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)8
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
- Contribution: COM(2014)0167
Activities
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate) RO
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate) RO
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (A8-0011/2016 - Brian Hayes)
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate)
- Notis MARIAS
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Burkhard BALZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Soledad CABEZÓN RUIZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Thomas MANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernard MONOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cora van NIEUWENHUIZEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sofia RIBEIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivica TOLIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike TREBESIUS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marco VALLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ángela VALLINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0011/2016 - Brian Hayes - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
612 |
2014/0091(COD)
2015/03/25
EMPL
84 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) (5b) It is necessary to break the link between the sustainability of the public pension system and the current crisis, in which the sharp fall in employment, caused largely by the economic policies being applied in the Union, is reducing revenue from contributions. It should also be explained that the alleged unsustainability of the public pension system is being used as a pretext for promoting private pension funds.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 c (new) (5c) It is necessary to ask why private pension funds, a form of savings, are being encouraged at the expense of public pensions. Pension funds (the term is a misnomer) benefit only the financial institutions in which invested money is deposited and which control the fund managers.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) When aiming at ensuring financial security in retirement, the benefits paid by institutions for occupational retirement provision should generally provide for the payment of a lifelong pension. Payments for a temporary period or a lump sum should also be possible. In addition, the Commission is called upon to find simple, user-friendly ways of making the quality of second-pillar pension products for women and men intelligible and to develop standards for consumer information and consumer protection by means of voluntary codes of conduct, as well as, possibly, by means of a compact, user-friendly EU certification scheme (European pensions mark) for such products.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) It is important to ensure that older and disabled people are not placed at risk of poverty and can enjoy a decent standard of living. Appropriate cover for biometrical risks in occupational pension arrangements is an important aspect of the fight against poverty and insecurity among elderly people. When setting up a pension scheme, employers and employees, or their respective representatives, should consider the possibility of the pension scheme including provisions for the coverage of the longevity risk and occupational disability risks, periods of absence from employment for the purpose of raising children, as well as provision for surviving dependants.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are not financial service providers
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28)
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) As very long-term investors with low liquidity risks, institutions for occupational retirement provision are in a position to invest in non-liquid assets such as shares as well as in instruments that have a long- term economic profile
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34)
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Institutions should be allowed to invest in other Member States in accordance with the rules of their home Member States
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Remuneration policies which encourage excessive risk-taking behaviour can undermine sound and effective risk management of institutions. Principles and disclosure requirements for remuneration policies applicable to other types of financial institutions in the Union should be made fully applicable also to institutions, bearing in mind, however, a balance between the need for transparency and the particular governance structure of institutions in comparison to other types of financial institutions and the need to take account of the size, nature, scope and complexity of the activities of institutions.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) It is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential vulnerabilities in relation to the sustainability of the pension scheme can be properly understood and discussed with the competent authorities. Institutions should, as part of their risk management system, produce a risk evaluation for their activities relating to pensions. That risk evaluation
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 45 (45) The safe-keeping and oversight duties related to the assets of institutions should be strengthened by clarifying the depositary’s roles and duties. Only where equivalent protections are not already in place or institutions operating schemes where members and beneficiaries bear all the risks should be required to appoint a depositary.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment, membership (including pre-retirement) and post-retirement. In particular, information concerning accrued pension entitlements, projected levels of retirement benefits, risks and guarantees, and costs should be given. Where members bear an investment risk, additional information on the investment profile, any available options and past performance are also crucial. However, clear and adequate information should not aim at the maximum of information only but also ensure that the information is adequate to the needs of the user and in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities especially as regards accessibility (Article 3) and access to information (Article 21).
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment,
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 48 (48) For the institution's members that have not yet retired, institutions should draw up a standardised pension benefit statement containing
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 53 (53)
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 57 (57) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale, the Commission should, after consulting EIOPA, review and report on the application of this Directive and should submit that report to the European Parliament and to the Council
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 59 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 Institutions for occupational retirement provision which also operate compulsory employment-related pension schemes which are considered to be social-security schemes covered by Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, which have their origin in an employment relationship and which thus are to be regarded as consideration for work performed in the context of the protective rights of an employment contract shall be covered by this Directive in respect of their non-compulsory occupational retirement provision business. In that case, the liabilities and the corresponding assets shall be ring-fenced and it shall not be possible to transfer them to the compulsory pension schemes which are considered as social-security schemes or vice versa.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point c (c) ’sponsoring undertaking’ means any undertaking or other body, regardless of whether it includes or consists of one or more legal or natural persons, which under national legislation is legally obliged or voluntarily commits to offering a pension scheme and which has an employment relationship with the scheme members and beneficiaries;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States may make the conditions of operation of institutions located in their territory subject to other requirements, with a view to ensuring that the interest of members and beneficiaries are adequately protected.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 10 10. Member States shall ensure that an institution carrying out cross-border activity shall
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The Commission shall propose any necessary measures to prevent possible distortions caused by different levels of interest rates and to protect the interest of beneficiaries and members of any scheme.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) investment in derivative instruments shall be possible insofar as they
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States may decide to permit criteria for investment which could go for lower returns but greater social benefit, if the stakeholders agree.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) investing in state-guaranteed instruments that have a long-term economic profile
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 8 Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Directive 2010/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1 a as regards capital requirements for the trading book and for re-securitisations, and the supervisory review of remuneration policies shall also apply to those persons who effectively run IORP institutions so as to ensure a sound remuneration policy. __________________ 1a Directive 2010/73/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 amending Directives 2003/71/EC on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market (OJ L 327, 11.12.2010, p. 1).
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) a qualitative assessment of new or emerging risks relating to climate change, fossil fuels, use of resources and the environment.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 4 4. The risk evaluation for pensions shall be
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. For each occupational pension scheme in which members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Where under national law of the home Member State there are no fiduciary obligations imposed on those who effectively run the institution or on those who hold scheme assets, and where no depositary is appointed for the safe
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 1 (1) Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established, and after careful consideration of the administrative burden involved and of the benefits to be secured, Member States
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) it shall be written in a clear manner, using clear, succinct, simple and comprehensible language, avoiding the use of jargon and avoiding technical terms where everyday words can be used instead and be in full compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, especially as regards accessibility (Article 3) and access to information (Article 21);
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (1) Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established, and after careful consideration of the administrative burden involved and of the benefits to be secured, Member States
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 1 (1) Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established, and after careful consideration of the administrative burden involved and of the benefits to be secured, Member States
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 2 (2) Member
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 3 (3) Any material change to the information contained in the
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 41 – paragraph 1 1. The information provided in
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 41 – paragraph 2 2. Where these provisions are applied, Member States shall ensure that the
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 41 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that all supplementary relevant information shall be easily available and accessible upon request by the members.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 48 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (1)
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (1) With regard to balance, contributions and costs, the
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (1) Where the pension scheme provides for a target level of benefits, the
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 a (new) Article 55a The provisions set out in Chapter 3 of this directive shall be subject to the legislative autonomy of the Member States. They may decide, in accordance with the circumstances and preconditions of their occupational pension schemes and in line with the subsidiarity principle, whether or not to apply the provisions of Chapter 3 to institutions for occupational pension provision within their territory.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 2 Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 61 – paragraph 4 4. Supervisory powers shall be applied in a timely and proportionate manner and shall take account of the rights of the consenting, and financing, employer.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 61 – paragraph 5 Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 65 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Member States shall ensure that a person may simultaneously contribute their expertise, for example with regard to legal issues or financial investments, for the firm (sponsor) and for the institution for occupational retirement provision and that this is prohibited only where the competent supervisory authority can demonstrate that there are well-founded indications of a conflict of interest.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 Four years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall review this Directive and report on its implementation and effectiveness to the European Parliament and the Council. The possibility of future or retroactive application of the provisions on capital requirements pursuant to Solvency II for insurance undertakings to institutions for occupational retirement provision shall be excluded.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Article 25 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that the Union recognises and respects the rights of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and independence and to participate in social and cultural life.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b (new) (1b) Providing public pensions sufficient to maintain a decent standard of living should therefore be an objective of the utmost social and political importance for all Member States.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 c (new) (1c) Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights should be specifically mentioned in this connection.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Member States and the EU should ensure that pensions by statutory social security schemes protect from old-age poverty and that supplementary pension schemes linked to employment contracts are promoted as additional coverage.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Occupational pension provision is not a financial service but the provision of a collective social welfare benefit.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are organised and regulated in completely different ways in the Member States. It therefore makes no sense to adopt a ‘one size fits all’ approach to institutions for occupational retirement provision. The Commission and EIOPA take account of the various traditions of the Member States in their activities and assign priority to national labour and social legislation in determining the organisation of institutions for occupational retirement provision.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In order to further facilitate the mobility of workers between Member States, this Directive aims to ensure good governance, information to scheme members, transparency and safety of the occupational retirement provision.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) (2b) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are often subject to joint management and monitoring by the social partners. This collective organisation makes them fundamentally different from financial service providers.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC represented a first legislative step on the way to an internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale. A genuine internal market for occupational retirement provision remains crucial for economic growth and job creation in the European Union and for tackling the challenge of an ageing European society. Therefore, the role of social dialogue is important. The Directive, dating from 2003, has not been substantially amended to introduce a modern risk-based governance system also for institutions for occupational retirement provision.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since social-security systems are coming under increasing pressure, which means that citizens will increasingly rely on occupational retirement pensions as a complement in the future. Occupational retirement pensions should be developed, without, however, calling into question the importance of social-security pension systems in terms of secure, durable and effective social protection, which should guarantee a decent standard of living in old age and should therefore be at the centre of the objective of strengthening the European social model. Regrettably, suggestions by the Commission and EIOPA that Solvency II regimes (such as the holistic balance sheet model) might be applied to institutions for occupational retirement provision have created legal uncertainty and an unpredictable context for planning and therefore hampered the further development of those institutions. Priority must be assigned to creating legal certainty, reinforcing successful models of institution for occupational retirement provision and protecting their continued existence.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business, the right to property, the right of collective bargaining and action and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning as well as facilitating cross-border business of institutions for occupational retirement provision and businesses. This Directive must be implemented in accordance with these rights and principles.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Public authorities have to ensure, through sufficient pensions kept up to date, that citizens are economically properly provided for in their old age. To that end, the public pension system needs to have the resources necessary to pay pensions.
source: 551.970
2015/04/15
FEMM
37 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Occupational pension provision is not an ordinary financial service, but the provision of a social welfare benefit by employers.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The internal market should allow institutions to operate in other Member States and
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The internal market should allow institutions to operate in other Member States and ensure a high level of protection for members and beneficiaries of occupational retirement schemes in full respect of the EU gender equality acquis and the principle of non-discrimination.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC represented a first legislative step on the way to an internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale. A genuine internal market for occupational retirement provision remains crucial for economic growth and job creation in the European Union and for tackling the challenge of an ageing European society. The Directive, dating from 2003, has not been substantially amended to introduce a
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Occupational retirement pensions are – in view of the demographic development in Europe and the situation of national budgets – an almost indispensable element of adequate, safe and sustainable retirement provision;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions within the pension systems of the Member States. This is important since social-security systems are coming under increasing pressure, which means that citizens will increasingly rely on occupational retirement pensions as a complement in the future. Occupational retirement pensions should be developed, without, however, calling into question the importance of social-security pension systems in terms of secure, durable and effective social protection, which should guarantee a decent standard of living in old age and should therefore be at the centre of the objective of strengthening the European social model.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since social-security systems are coming under increasing pressure, which means that citizens will increasingly rely on occupational retirement pensions as a complement in the future. Occupational retirement pensions should be developed, without, however, calling into question the importance of social-security pension systems in terms of secure, durable and effective social protection, which should guarantee a decent standard of living in old age and should therefore be at the centre of the objective of strengthening the European social model; noticing, however, that pre- existing inequalities in the labour market, like the gender pay gap, are mirrored in cumulated disadvantages in the first and second pension pillar, resulting in lower pensions and a risk of poverty in old age.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Action is needed to secure equal access to decent pension schemes for women, correcting the imbalances created by persistent inequalities between men and women in the labour market.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to equality and non-discrimination on grounds such as gender, sexual orientation and household composition, the right to conduct a business and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning as well as facilitating cross-border business of institutions for occupational retirement provision and businesses. This Directive must be implemented in accordance with these rights and
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Despite the entry into force of Directive 2003/41/EC important prudential barriers remain which make it more expensive for institutions to operate pension schemes across borders. Moreover, the current minimum level of protection for members and beneficiaries needs to be increased. This is all the more important as the number of Europeans relying on schemes that shift longevity and market risks from the institution or the undertaking offering the occupational scheme ("sponsoring undertaking") to the individual has increased significantly. In addition, the current minimum level of information provision to members and beneficiaries needs to be increased to ensure greater ease of access to information. Those developments warrant an amendment of the Directive.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, European legislation should respect the diversity of models of occupational retirement provision institutions which vary enormously between Member States - a ‘one size fits all’ solution is not possible. Furthermore, Member States should retain full responsibility for the organisation of their pension systems as well as for the decision on the role of each of the three "pillars" of the retirement system in individual Member States. In the context of the second pillar, they should also retain full responsibility for the role and functions of the various institutions providing occupational retirement benefits, such as industry-wide pension funds, company pension funds and life-assurance
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Taking into account that the gender pension gap in the EU is 39% on average, the Commission should not just rely on prudential rules but should encourage Member States to develop top up schemes, with monitory mechanisms to control its effects, to contribute to the second pillar pension as a way to close the gender pension gap and to guarantee the women's access to a decent pension.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) When aiming at ensuring financial security in retirement, the benefits paid by institutions for occupational retirement
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) It is important to ensure that older and disabled people are not placed at risk of poverty and can enjoy a decent standard of living, paying attention to the particularly precarious situation of elderly women. Appropriate cover for biometrical risks in occupational pension arrangements is an important aspect of the fight against poverty and insecurity among elderly people. When setting up a pension scheme, employers and employees, or their respective representatives, should consider the possibility of the pension scheme including provisions for the coverage of the longevity risk and occupational disability risks as well as provision for surviving dependants, so as to allow elderly people to move to retirement homes if they can no longer live by themselves.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) It is important to ensure that farmers, mothers raising children, older and disabled people are not placed at risk of poverty and can enjoy a decent standard of living. Appropriate cover for biometrical risks in occupational pension arrangements is an important aspect of the fight against poverty and insecurity among elderly people. When setting up a pension scheme, employers and employees, or their respective representatives, should consider the possibility of the pension scheme including provisions for the coverage of the longevity risk and occupational disability risks as well as provision for surviving dependants.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) It is important to ensure that older and disabled people are not placed at risk of poverty and can enjoy a decent standard of living. Appropriate cover for biometrical risks in occupational pension arrangements is an important aspect of the fight against poverty and insecurity among elderly people. When setting up a pension scheme,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In order to protect members and beneficiaries, institutions for occupational retirement provision should limit their activities to the activities, and those arising therefrom, referred to in this Directive and provide clear and relevant information to members and beneficiaries for the purpose of ensuring good governance and risk management.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 45 (45) The safe-keeping and oversight duties related to the assets of institutions should be strengthened by clarifying the depositary’s roles and duties. Only institutions operating schemes where members and beneficiaries bear all the risks should be required to appoint a depositary, providing equivalent protection mechanisms do not already exist.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment, membership (including pre-retirement) and post-retirement. In particular, information concerning accrued pension entitlements, projected levels of retirement benefits, risks and guarantees, and costs should be given. Where members bear an investment risk, additional information on the investment profile, any available options and past performance are also crucial. Consumer information and consumer protection could be briefly summarised and rendered intelligible by means of voluntary codes of conduct and possibly by means of a compact, user-friendly EU certification system (pensions mark).
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 48 (48)
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 57 (57) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale, the Commission should, after consulting EIOPA, review and report on the application of this Directive and should submit that report to the European Parliament and to the Council four years after the entry into force of this Directive. That review should assess in particular the application of the rules regarding the calculation of the technical provisions, the funding of technical provisions, regulatory own funds, solvency margins, investment rules and any other aspect relating to the financial solvency situation of the institution. The application of Solvency II to the capital requirements for occupational retirement provision institutions should be permanently ruled out.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 59 Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point d (d) ‘retirement benefits’ means benefits paid by reference to reaching, or the expectation of reaching, retirement and having their origin in an employment relationship and being thus regarded as consideration for work performed in the context of the protective rights of an employment contract or, where they are supplementary to those benefits and provided on an ancillary basis, in the form of payments on death, disability, or cessation of employment or in the form of support payments or services in case of sickness, indigence or death. In order to facilitate financial security in retirement, these benefits usually take the form of payments for life. They may, however, also be payments made for a temporary period or as a lump sum.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and taking due account of the scale of pension benefits offered by the social-security regimes, Member States may provide that a national minimum pension be introduced which cannot fall below the risk-of-poverty threshold, that the option of longevity and disability cover, provision for surviving dependants and a guarantee of repayment of contributions as additional benefits be offered to members if employers and employees, or their respective representatives, so agree.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Member States should guarantee that part-time workers, workers facing job discontinuity and workers with career gaps or with periods where fewer hours were worked have an effective equalisation to full time workers in their right to access to a decent pension scheme without any form of discrimination.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – introductory part (3)
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 61 – paragraph 4 4. Supervisory powers shall be applied in a
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 65 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Member States shall ensure that any person, irrespective of gender, may simultaneously contribute their expertise, for example with regard to legal issues or financial investments, for the firm (sponsor) and for the institution for occupational retirement provision and that this is prohibited only where the competent supervisory authority can demonstrate that there are well-founded indications of a conflict of interest.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 Four years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall review this Directive and report on its implementation and effectiveness to the European Parliament and the Council. The possibility of future or retroactive application of the provisions on capital requirements pursuant to Solvency II for insurance undertakings to institutions for occupational retirement provision shall be excluded.
source: 554.786
2015/05/26
EMPL
20 amendments...
Amendment A #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Member States should ensure the social protection of workers with regard to pensions by providing public pensions sufficient to maintain a decent standard of living and to protect from old-age poverty and by promoting supplementary pension schemes linked to employment contracts as additional coverage.
Amendment B #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC
Amendment C #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further
Amendment D #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Taking into account the need to further develop occupational pension schemes, the Commission could provide significant added value at Union level by undertaking further steps in supporting Member States' cooperation with social partners in the development of more second pillar pension schemes and by establishing a High Level Group of experts to explore ways to increase second pillar retirement savings in the Member States, including the promotion of the exchange of best practices between the Member States.
Amendment E #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 20. Institutions for occupational retirement provision are not financial service providers
Amendment F #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28)
Amendment G #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) As very long-term investors with low liquidity risks, institutions for occupational retirement provision are in a position to invest in non-liquid assets such as shares as well as in instruments that have a long- term economic profile and are not traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities within prudent limits. They can also benefit from the advantages of international diversification. Investments in shares in currencies other than those of the liabilities and in instruments that have a long-term economic profile and are not traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities should therefore not be restricted except on prudential grounds, in line with the 'prudent person' rule so as to protect the interest of members.
Amendment H #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Institutions should be allowed to invest in other Member States in accordance with the rules of their home Member States
Amendment I #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment, membership (including pre-retirement) and post-retirement. In particular, information concerning accrued pension entitlements, projected levels of retirement benefits, risks and guarantees, and costs should be given. Where members bear an investment risk, additional information on the investment profile, any available options and past performance are also crucial. All information shall be adequate to the needs of the user and in compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, especially as regards accessibility (Article 3) and access to information (Article 21).
Amendment J #
Proposal for a directive Recital 60 a (new) (60a) The further development at the EU level of solvency models, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet (HBS), is not realistic in practical terms and not effective in terms of costs and benefits, particularly given the diversity of IORPs within and across Member States. No quantitative capital requirements - such as Solvency II or holistic balance sheet models derived therefrom - shall therefore be developed at the European level with regard to institutions for occupational retirement provision, as they could potentially be harmful to the interests of both employees and employers, and could decrease the willingness of employers to provide occupational pensions.
Amendment K #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Members States may make the conditions of operation of institutions located in their territory subject to other requirements, without discrimination and with a view to ensuring that the interest of members and beneficiaries are adequately protected.
Amendment KA #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment L #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) investing in instruments that have a long-term economic profile and are not traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities
Amendment M #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their
Amendment N #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 1. Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established, each Member State
Amendment O #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraphs 1 and 2 1. Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established Member States shall, in respect of every institution located in their territories, ensure that members are sufficiently informed of the conditions of the pension scheme, in particular concerning:
Amendment P #
Proposal for a directive Article 40-54 Amendment Q #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 1. The institution shall ensure that prospective members are informed about all the features of the scheme and any investment options including information on if and how environmental, climate, social and corporate governance issues are considered in the investment approach.
Amendment R #
Proposal for a directive Article 73, paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment S #
Proposal for a directive Article 75, paragraph 1 source: 557.280
2015/10/05
ECON
168 amendments...
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Social security is primarily a matter for public authorities and consistent with the principles of solidarity between generations and social justice. Member States have to be able to provide their citizens with a decent pension that will genuinely protect them against poverty and social hardship.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The internal market should allow institutions to operate in other Member States and, in the process, ensure a high level of protection and security for members and beneficiaries of occupational retirement schemes.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The internal market should allow institutions to operate in other Member States and ensure a high level of protection for members and beneficiaries of occupational retirement schemes
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) However, this Directive is aimed at minimum harmonisation and therefore should not preclude Member States from maintaining or introducing more stringent provisions in order to protect members and beneficiaries, provided that such provisions are consistent with Member States' obligations under Union law. This Directive does not concern issues of national social and labour law, fiscal and contract legislation nor the adequacy of pension provisions in Member States.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) This minimum harmonisation Directive should fully respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and should not preclude Member States from maintaining or introducing further provisions in order to protect members and beneficiaries, provided that such provisions are consistent with Member States' obligations under Union law. This Directive should not concern issues of national social, labour and tax law, and contract legislation nor the adequacy of pension provisions in Member States.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In view of changing work patterns and increasing worker mobility, new individualised pensions solutions are being developed within collective systems. The rules should facilitate the development of new, innovative pension products, so as to guarantee adequate retirement provisions for all, regardless of career patterns or place of work.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC represented a first legislative step on the way to an internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Directive 2003/41/EC represented a first legislative step on the way to an internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale. A
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The impact assessment was rejected twice by the Commission's impact assessment board, inter alia because its proposed measures failed to address the shared aim to tackle the European dimension of the problem. The latter, however, should be the core aim of this Directive.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Occupational retirement pensions are, in view of the demographic development in Europe and the situation regarding national budgets, an almost indispensable element of adequate, safe and sustainable retirement provision.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The activities of the institutions for occupational retirement provision should safeguard the intergenerational balance by ensuring equitable spread of risks and benefits between generations.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Appropriate action is needed to
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since social-security systems are coming under increasing pressure, which means that citizens will increasingly rely on occupational retirement pensions
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since social-security systems are coming under increasing pressure, which means that citizens will increasingly rely on occupational retirement pensions as a complement in the future. Occupational retirement pensions should be developed, without, however, calling into question the importance of social-security pension systems in terms of secure, durable and effective social protection, which should guarantee a decent standard of living in old age and should therefore be at the centre of the objective of strengthening the European social model. Regrettably, suggestions that Solvency II regimes (such as the holistic balance sheet model) might be applied to institutions for occupational retirement provision have created legal uncertainty and an unpredictable context for planning and therefore hampered the further development and expansion of those institutions. Priority must be assigned to creating legal certainty, reinforcing successful models of institutions for occupational retirement provision and protecting their continued existence.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In view of demographic developments in the Union and the situation regarding national budgets, occupational retirement provision is an important complement to public pension systems, but cannot replace the latter as the primary expression of intergenerational solidarity in the provision of adequate, safe and sustainable retirement benefits, an essential public good.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Action is needed to secure equal access to decent pension schemes for women, correcting the imbalances created by persistent inequalities between men and women in the labour market.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the right that older people have to live with dignity and independently, the right that workers have to be informed and consulted at company level, the right of collective bargaining and collective action, the right to social security benefits and welfare provision affording protection and the means of living decently into old age, these being entitlements that should be enjoyed by every person legally residing in, or moving within, the Union, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by strengthening compulsory pension schemes and ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning, a
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to equality and non-discrimination on any ground such as sex, sexual orientation and social origin, including household composition, the right to conduct a business and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning that takes account of the financial literacy of each individual member of an occupational retirement scheme as well as facilitating cross-border business of institutions for occupational retirement provision and businesses. This Directive must be implemented in accordance with these rights and principles.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business, the right to information and consultation within the undertaking, the right of collective bargaining and action and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning as well as facilitating cross-border business of institutions for occupational retirement provision and businesses. This Directive must be implemented in accordance with these rights and principles.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business, the right to property, the right of collective bargaining and action and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning as well as facilitating cross-border business of institutions for occupational retirement provision and businesses. This Directive must be implemented in accordance with these rights and principles.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to property, the right of collective bargaining and action, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning as well as facilitating cross-border business of institutions for occupational retirement provision and businesses. This Directive must be implemented in accordance with these rights and principles.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business, the right to property and the right to a high level of consumer protection, in particular by ensuring a higher level of transparency of retirement provisioning, informed personal financial and retirement planning as well as facilitating cross-border
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business and the right to
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In order to improve the functioning of the internal market in the field of occupational retirement provision, it is important that the procedures enabling institutions to carry out cross-border activity be clarified and that unnecessary obstacles, which hamper such cross- border activity, be removed. Facilitating cross-border activity could have a positive impact on affiliated undertakings and their employees, in whichever Member State they work, through the centralisation of the management of the occupational retirement provision business and the protection of an adequate European prudential framework.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Member States should enhance the protection of pension rights of workers temporarily sent to work in another Member State.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) D
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Despite the entry into force of Directive 2003/41/EC important prudential barriers remain which make it more expensive for institutions to operate pension schemes across borders. Moreover, the current minimum level of protection for members and beneficiaries needs to be increased and must be determined taking into account the Union principles of non- discrimination and gender equality. This is all the more important as the number of Europeans relying on schemes that shift longevity and market risks from the institution or the undertaking offering the occupational scheme (
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Despite the entry into force of Directive
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The prudential rules laid down in this Directive are intended
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The prudential rules laid down in this Directive are intended both to guarantee a high degree of security for future pensioners through the imposition of stringent supervisory standards, and to clear the way for the sound, prudent, and efficient management of occupational pension schemes.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8)
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) It is regrettable that in certain Member States private pension funds were used to decrease state debt and deficit and therefore long-term stability jeopardised by short-term goals.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States should retain
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States should retain
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States should retain full responsibility for the organisation of their pension systems as well as for the decision on the role of each of the three ‘pillars’ of the retirement system in individual Member States. In the context of the second pillar, they should also retain full responsibility for the role and functions of the various institutions providing occupational retirement benefits, such as industry-wide pension funds, company pension funds and life-assurance companies. This Directive
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States should retain full responsibility for the organisation of their pension systems as well as for the decision on the role of each of the three "pillars" of the retirement system in individual Member States. In the context of the second pillar, they should also retain full responsibility for the role and functions of the various institutions providing occupational retirement benefits, such as industry-wide pension funds, company pension funds and life-assurance companies. This Directive is not intended to call this prerogative into question. There should nonetheless be common rules so as to restrict regulatory arbitrage by institutions for occupational retirement provision.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States should retain full responsibility for the organisation of their pension systems as well as for the decision on the role of each of the three ‘pillars’ of the retirement system in individual Member States. In the context of
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Rather, this Directive should also seek to encourage Member States to build up stable and well functioning national pension systems. In addition, it should support the expansion of occupational retirement provision in Member States through close cooperation and the sharing of best practices of, in particular, those Member States which already have well developed second-pillar pension systems.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In accordance with the principle of proportionality and in line with Better Regulation objectives to reduce regulatory burdens and costs on businesses, the rules laid down in this Directive should minimise administrative and financial burdens on all actors.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Given the importance of ensuring adequate pension levels and closing the gender pension gap, the Commission should study extensively the impact of different pillars, pensions systems and their structures on both women and men. Based on the results, the Commission should propose actions and possible structural changes that are needed in order to ensure equal levels of pensions for women and men across the Member States.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 b (new) (9b) Taking into account that the gender pension gap in the Union is 39 % on average, the Commission should not just rely on prudential rules but should also encourage Member States to develop top- up schemes, with monitory mechanisms to control their effects, to contribute to the second pillar pension as a way to close the gender pension gap and to guarantee women's access to a decent pension.
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) National rules concerning the participation of self-employed persons in institutions for occupational retirement provision differ. In some Member States, institutions for occupational retirement provision can operate on the basis of agreements with trade or trade groups whose members act in a self-employed capacity or directly with self-employed and employed persons. In some Member States a self-employed person can also become a member of an institution when the self- employed person acts as employer or provides professional services to an undertaking. In some Member States self- employed persons cannot join an institution for occupational retirement provision unless certain requirements, including those imposed by social and labour law, are met. In any event, membership of occupational pension schemes cannot be regarded as grounds for excluding or exempting self-employed persons from membership of social security systems intended for them.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) National rules concerning the participation of self-employed persons in institutions for occupational retirement provision differ. In some Member States, institutions for occupational retirement provision can operate on the basis of agreements with trade or trade groups whose members act in a self-employed capacity or directly with self-employed and employed persons. In some Member States a self-employed person can also become a member of an institution when the self- employed person acts as employer or provides professional services to an undertaking. In some Member States self- employed persons cannot join an institution for occupational retirement provision unless certain requirements, including those imposed by social and labour law, are met. The Union needs to produce guidelines in order to deal with these differences and make the system more uniform. Cooperation between the Commission and the Member States is provided for in Article 21 of this Directive.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Institutions managing social-security schemes, which are already coordinated at Union level, should be excluded from the scope of this Directive. (The new legislation on the coordination of social security schemes has been in force in the Union since 1 May 2010 and comprises the following consolidated Regulations: Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and the act implementing it, Regulation (EC) No 987/2009). Account should nevertheless be taken of the specificity of institutions which, in a single Member State, manage both social-security schemes and occupational pension schemes.
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Financial institutions which already benefit from a Union legislative framework should in general be excluded from the scope of this Directive
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Financial institutions which already benefit from a Union legislative framework should not in general be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) When aiming at ensuring financial
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) When aiming at ensuring financial security in retirement, the benefits paid by institutions for occupational retirement provision should generally provide for the payment of a lifelong pension. Payments for a temporary period or a lump sum should also be possible. In addition, the Commission should find simple and user- friendly ways to render the quality of second and third pillar retirement products intelligible to women and men and develop standards of consumer information and consumer protection by means of voluntary codes of conduct and possibly by means of a compact, user- friendly Union certification system (pensions mark) for such products.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) It is important to ensure that farmers, mothers raising children and older and disabled people are not placed at risk of poverty and can enjoy a decent standard of living, taking into account the particularly precarious situation of elderly women. Appropriate cover for biometrical risks in occupational pension arrangements is an important aspect of the fight against poverty and insecurity among elderly people. When setting up a pension scheme, employers and employees, or their respective representatives, should consider the possibility of the pension scheme including provisions for the coverage of the longevity risk and occupational disability risks
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) Giving Member States the possibility to exclude from the scope of national implementing legislation institutions managing schemes which together have less than 100 members in total can facilitate supervision in some Member States, without undermining the proper functioning of the internal market in this field. Supervision in this field is carried out by the competent authorities of Member States, which should be coordinated at European level by an appropriate body so as to make for a more consistent system of supervision. However, this should not undermine the right of such institutions to appoint for the management of their investment
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Institutions such as “Unterstützungskassen” in Germany, where the members have no legal rights to benefits of a certain amount and where their interests are protected by a compulsory statutory insolvency insurance, should be excluded from the scope of the Directive. More generally, it is necessary to differentiate between “compulsory insurance” and “retirement benefits for biometrical risks” as referred to in Article 6(d) and (h) of this Directive.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In order to protect members and beneficiaries, institutions for occupational
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In the event of the bankruptcy of a sponsoring undertaking, a member faces the risk of losing both his/her job and his/her acquired pension rights. This makes it necessary to ensure that there is a clear separation between that undertaking and the institution and that minimum prudential standards are laid down to protect members. The access of the institution to pension protection schemes or similar mechanisms which provide protection to accrued individual entitlements of members and beneficiaries against the risk of default of the sponsoring undertaking should be taken into account when prudential standards are laid down and specified.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In the event of the bankruptcy of a sponsoring undertaking, a member faces the risk of losing both his/her job and his/her acquired pension rights. This makes it necessary to ensure that there is a clear separation between that undertaking and the institution and that minimum prudential standards and an appropriate guarantee fund are laid down to protect members.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) A resilient system builds on the diversification of products, the diversity of institutions and the sizes of institutions as well as effective and converging supervisory practices.
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 b (new) (19b) The over-fragmentation of particular markets with high numbers of very small institutions for occupational retirement provisions can however be challenging in terms of supervision but also the economic benefits for the employees can be questioned.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are not financial service providers
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are not financial service providers
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20)
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are financial service providers which bear a heavy responsibility for the provision of occupational retirement benefits
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are often subject to joint management and monitoring by the social partners. This collective organisation makes them fundamentally different from financial service providers.
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are a vital part of the European economy, holding assets worth €2.5 trillion on behalf of around 75 million Europeans.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21)
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) The huge number of institutions in certain Member States means a pragmatic solution is necessary as regards prior authorisation of institutions. However, if
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) The huge number of institutions in certain Member States means a pragmatic solution is necessary as regards prior authorisation of institutions. However, if an institution wishes to manage a scheme in another Member State, a prior authorisation granted by the competent authority of the
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Without prejudice to national social and labour legislation on the organisation of pension systems, including compulsory membership and the outcomes of collective bargaining agreements, institutions should have the possibility of providing their services in other Member States upon receipt of the authorisation from the competent authority of the institution’s home Member State.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Without prejudice to national social and labour legislation on the organisation of pension systems, including compulsory membership and the outcomes of collective bargaining agreements, institutions should have the possibility of providing their services in other Member States upon receipt of the authorisation from the competent authority of the
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) The exercise of the right of an institution in one Member State to manage an occupational pension scheme contracted in another Member State should fully respect the provisions of the social and labour law in force in the host Member State insofar as it is relevant to occupational pensions, for example the definition and payment of retirement benefits and the conditions for transferability of pension rights. The scope of prudential rules should be clarified in order to ensure legal certainty for the cross- border activities of the institutions. The above provisions should in every case be without prejudice to the fundamental rights and general principles common to all Member States.
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) The exercise of the right of an institution established in one Member State to manage an occupational pension scheme contracted in another Member State should fully respect the provisions of the social and labour law in force in th
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) Institutions should be able to transfer pension schemes to other institutions across borders within the Union in order to facilitate the organisation of occupational retirement provision on a Union scale, subject
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) Institutions should be able to transfer pension schemes to other institutions across borders within the Union in order to facilitate the organisation of occupational retirement provision on a Union scale, subject only to authorisation from the competent authority in the
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) A prudent calculation of technical provisions is an essential condition to ensure that obligations to pay retirement benefits can be met. Technical provisions should be calculated on the basis of recognised actuarial methods and certified by qualified persons. A basic minimum level of technical provisions should be available at all times. The maximum interest rates should be chosen prudently according to any relevant national rules. The minimum amount of technical provisions should both be sufficient for benefits already in payment to beneficiaries to continue to be paid and reflect the commitments that arise out of members’ accrued pension rights.
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) A prudent calculation of technical provisions is an essential condition to ensure that obligations to pay retirement benefits can be met. Technical provisions should be calculated on the basis of recognised actuarial methods and certified by qualified persons. The maximum interest rates should be chosen prudently according to any relevant national rules and in any case should not exceed those used for Life Insurance. The minimum amount of technical
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) A prudent calculation of technical provisions is an essential condition to ensure that obligations to pay retirement benefits can be met both in the short and in the long-term. Technical provisions should be calculated on the basis of recognised actuarial methods and certified by qualified persons. The maximum interest rates should be chosen prudently according to any relevant national rules. The minimum amount of technical provisions should both be sufficient for benefits already in payment to beneficiaries to continue to be paid and reflect the commitments that arise out of members' accrued pension rights.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) Risks covered by institutions vary
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent.
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent. In
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent.
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to fully cover the technical provisions at all times and under suitably prudent assumptions of future returns on assets in order to protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent. In particular in cases of cross- border activity, the mutual recognition of supervisory principles applied in Member States requires that the technical provisions be fully funded at all times.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent.
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions are necessary to protect the interests of members and beneficiaries of the pension scheme if the sponsoring undertaking becomes insolvent. In particular in cases of cross-border activity, the mutual recognition of supervisory principles applied in Member States requires that the technical provisions be fully funded at all times.
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Member States should exchange best practices on cross-border institutions for occupational retirement provisions and encourage bi-lateral supervisory cooperation between competent authorities to address national barriers and to stimulate cross-border pensions.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28)
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28) If the institution does not work on a cross-border basis, Member States should be able to permit temporary underfunding provided that a proper
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Institutions are very long-term investors. Redemption of the assets held by these institutions cannot, in general, be made for any purpose other than providing retirement benefits. Furthermore, in order to protect adequately the rights of members and beneficiaries and ensure the intergenerational balance in occupational pension provision, institutions should be able to opt for an asset allocation that suits the precise nature and duration of their
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) By setting the "prudent person" rule as the underlying principle for capital investment and making it possible for institutions to operate
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Supervisory methods and practices vary among Member States. Therefore, Member States should be given some discretion on the precise investment rules that they wish to impose on the institutions located in their territories. However, these rules should not restrict the free movement of capital
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Supervisory methods and practices vary among Member States. Therefore, Member States should be given some discretion on the precise investment rules that they wish to impose on the institutions located in their territories.
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) As very long-term investors with
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) As very long-term investors with low liquidity risks, institutions for occupational retirement provision are in a position to invest in non-liquid assets such as shares as well as in instruments that have a long- term economic profile and are not traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities within prudent limits. They can also benefit from the advantages of international
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) As very long-term investors with low liquidity risks, institutions for occupational retirement provision are in a position to invest in non-liquid assets such as shares as well as in instruments that have a long- term economic profile and are not traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities within prudent limits. They can also benefit from the advantages of international diversification. Investments in shares in currencies other than those of the liabilities and in instruments that have a long-term economic profile and are not traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities should therefore not be restricted except on prudential grounds, in line with the "prudent person" rule so as to protect the interest of members.
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) The understanding of what constitutes instruments with a long-term economic profile is broad. These instruments are non- transferable securities and therefore do not have access to the liquidity of secondary markets. They often require fixed term commitments which restrict their marketability. These instruments should be understood to include participations, debt instruments in non-listed undertakings and loans provided to them.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) The understanding of what constitutes instruments with a long-term economic profile is broad. These instruments are non- transferable securities and therefore do not
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Unless an institution operates on a cross-border basis, its internal investment rules, remuneration policies and other governance provisions as set out in this Directive are primarily a matter for Member States. However, those governance provisions, could be applied by the state or, if not, serve as a guidance for Member States in regulating their national second pillar pension schemes.
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Institutions should be allowed to invest in other Member States in accordance with the rules of their home Member States in order to reduce the cost of cross-border activity.
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Institutions should be allowed to invest in other Member States in accordance with the rules of the
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Institutions should be allowed to invest in other Member States in accordance with the rules of their home Member States in order to reduce the cost of cross-border activity. Therefore the host Member States should not be allowed to impose additional investment requirements on institutions located in other Member States. If two conflicting requirements are imposed under Member State rules, the disagreement should be resolved by the competent authorities.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) (35a) Pension tracking services such as T- TYPE enable citizens who work in another Member State to have an overview of their accrued pension rights stemming from statutory and occupational pension schemes. The Commission should support the establishment of pension tracking services, whilst acknowledging their bottom-up character.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 (36) Some risks cannot be reduced through quantitative requirements reflected in the technical provisions and funding
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 (36) Some risks cannot be reduced through quantitative requirements reflected in the technical provisions and funding requirements but can only be properly addressed through governance requirements. Ensuring an effective system of governance, both internally and coordinated at European level, is therefore essential for the adequate management of risk. Those systems should be proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the activities.
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Remuneration policies which encourage excessive risk-taking behaviour
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Remuneration policies which encourage excessive risk-taking behaviour can undermine sound and effective risk management of institutions. Principles and disclosure requirements for remuneration policies applicable to other types of financial institutions in the Union should be made applicable also to institutions, bearing in mind, however, the particular governance structure of institutions in comparison to other types of financial institutions and the need to take account of the size, nature, scope and complexity of the activities of institutions. The provisions on remuneration should be without prejudice to the rights, where applicable, of the social partners to conclude and enforce collective agreements, in accordance with national law and customs.
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Remuneration policies which encourage excessive risk-taking behaviour can undermine sound and effective risk management of institutions. Principles and disclosure requirements for remuneration policies applicable to other types of financial institutions in the Union should be made applicable also to institutions, bearing in mind, however, the particular governance structure of institutions in comparison to other types of financial institutions and the need to take account of the size, nature, scope and complexity of the activities of institutions. The provisions on remuneration should apply without prejudice to the rights, where applicable, of the social partners to conclude and enforce collective agreements, in accordance with national law and customs.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Remuneration policies which encourage excessive risk-taking behaviour can undermine sound and effective risk management of institutions. Principles and disclosure requirements for remuneration policies applicable to other types of financial institutions in the Union should be made applicable also to institutions,
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new) (37a) An active role of social partners in the management of the institutions is key to ensuring that the institutions act in a responsive and responsible way. The provisions on governance in this Directive should therefore be without prejudice to rules and practices aimed at guaranteeing or facilitating such a role, such as national legislation on the representation of employees in the management or supervisory body.
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39)
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39)
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) All persons that perform key functions should be fit and proper. However, only the key function holders should be subject to notification requirements to the competent
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) All persons that perform key functions should be fit and proper and be of a certain level of integrity, including demonstrating gender sensitivity. However, only the key function holders should be subject to notification requirements to the competent authority.
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) Furthermore, with the exception of the internal audit function,
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) Furthermore, with the exception of the internal audit function,
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) It is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) It is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential vulnerabilities in relation to the sustainability of the pension scheme can be properly understood and discussed with the competent authorities. Institutions should, as part of their risk management system, produce a risk evaluation for their activities relating to pensions. That risk evaluation should also be made available to the competent authorities
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) It is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential vulnerabilities in relation to the sustainability of the pension scheme can be properly understood and discussed with the competent authorities. Institutions should, as part of their risk management system, produce a risk evaluation for their activities relating to pensions. That risk evaluation should also be made available to the competent authorities. In that evaluation institutions should provide among others a qualitative description of key elements determining their funding position in accordance with national law, the effectiveness of their risk-management system and the ability to comply with the requirements regarding technical provisions.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) It is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential vulnerabilities in relation to the sustainability of the pension scheme can be properly understood and discussed with the customers and competent authorities. Institutions should, as part of their risk management system, produce a risk evaluation for their activities relating to pensions. That risk evaluation should also be made available to the customers and competent authorities. In that evaluation institutions should provide among others a qualitative description of key elements determining their funding position in accordance with national law, the effectiveness of their risk-management system and the ability to comply with the requirements regarding technical provisions, including the ability to differentiate among technical provisions for men and women. This risk evaluation should include new or emerging risks, such as risks related to climate change, resource use, or the environment.
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) In order to ensure intergenerational balance in occupational pension provision, it is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential vulnerabilities in relation to the sustainability of the pension scheme can be properly understood and discussed with the competent authorities. Institutions should,
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 42 (42) Each Member State should require that every institution located in its territory draw up annual accounts and annual reports
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 43 (43) The investment policy of an institution is a decisive factor for both the security and
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 43 a (new) (43a) Institutions should make investment decisions that are sound and responsible from a social, environmental and societal point of view. Surveys have shown that a majority of members do expect from their institution that they take these factors into account. Moreover, a narrow focus on short term maximisation of profits may conflict with member's long-term interests.
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 44 (44) Institutions should be allowed, after informing, and obtaining the consent of, members and beneficiaries, to entrust their management, in whole or in part, to other entities operating on their behalf. Institutions should remain fully responsible for discharging all of their obligations under this Directive when they outsource key functions or any other activities.
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 45 (45) The safe-keeping and oversight duties related to the assets of institutions should be strengthened by clarifying the depositary’s roles and duties.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment, membership (including pre-retirement), periods out of work or periods where fewer hours were worked, and post- retirement. In particular, information concerning accrued pension entitlements
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment, membership (including pre-retirement) and post-retirement. In particular, information concerning accrued pension entitlements, projected levels of retirement benefits, risks and guarantees, and costs should be given. Where members bear an investment risk, additional information on the investment profile, any available options and past performance
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Institutions should provide clear and adequate information to prospective members, members and beneficiaries to support their decision-making about their retirement and ensure a high level of transparency throughout the various phases of a scheme comprising pre-enrolment, membership (including pre-retirement) and post-retirement. In particular, information concerning accrued pension entitlements, projected levels of retirement benefits, financial risks and guarantees, and costs should be given. Where members bear an investment risk, additional information on the investment profile, any available options and past performance are also crucial.
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 (47) Before joining a scheme, prospective members should be given all the necessary information to make an informed choice such as possibilities to opt out, contributions, costs, financial risks, and investment options
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 (47) Before joining a scheme, prospective members should be given all the necessary information to make an informed choice such as possibilities to opt out, contributions, costs and investment options, where applicable. Important basic information, e.g. concerning contributions and benefits, should also be made available to prospective members who, because they are automatically admitted to a particular pension scheme, do not have options to choose from.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 (47) Before joining a scheme, prospective members should be given all the necessary information to make an informed choice such as possibilities to opt out, contributions, costs and investment options, where applicable. Where members are automatically enrolled in a pension scheme, the institution should provide them with the key relevant information about their membership within a short period of time after enrolment.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 (47) Before joining a scheme, prospective members should be given all the necessary information to make an informed choice such as possibilities to opt out, contributions, costs and investment options, where applicable. Such information should invariably be produced in writing and registered in order to protect both the institution and prospective members.
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 (47) Before joining a scheme, prospective members should be given all the necessary information to make an informed choice such as possibilities to opt out, consequences of career gaps or part-time contracts, contributions, costs and investment options, where applicable.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 a (new) (47a) In some Member States a shift has happened in private pensions from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC), leading to coverage gap between men and women.
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 48 (48) For the institution's members that have not yet retired, institutions should draw up a standardised pension benefit statement containing
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 48 (48) For the institution's members that have not yet retired, institutions should draw up a standardised pension benefit statement
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 48 (48) For the institution's members that have not yet retired, institutions should draw up a standardised pension benefit statement containing key personal and generic information about the pension scheme.
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 48 (48) For the
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 49 (49) Institutions should inform members sufficiently in advance before retirement about their pay-out options. Where the retirement benefit is not paid out as a lifetime annuity, members that approach retirement should receive clear, tailored and gender-disaggregated information about the benefit payment products available, in order to facilitate financial planning for retirement.
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 50 (50) During the phase when retirement benefits are paid, beneficiaries should continue to receive information on their benefits and corresponding payment options. This is particularly important when a significant level of investment risk is borne by beneficiaries in the pay-out phase. Beneficiaries should be informed of any potential reduction in the level of benefits due, prior to any decision on such a potential reduction.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 51 (51) The competent authority should exercise its powers having as its prime objective the protection of the rights of members and beneficiaries and the stability and soundness of the institutions.
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 52 (52) The scope of prudential supervision differs between Member States. This can cause problems where an institution needs to comply with the prudential regulation of
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 53 (53) An internal market for institutions requires mutual recognition of prudential standards. The institution's adherence to those standards should be supervised by the competent authorities of the
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 57 (57) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale, the
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 57 (57) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale, the Commission should, after consulting EIOPA, review and report on the application of this Directive and should submit that report to the European Parliament and to the Council four years after the entry into force of this Directive. That review should assess in particular the application of the rules
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 57 (57) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale, the Commission should, after consulting EIOPA, review and report on the application of this Directive and should submit that report to the European Parliament and to the Council
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 57 (57) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale, the Commission should, after consulting EIOPA, review and report on the application of this Directive and should submit that report to the European
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 59 Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 59 Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 59 Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 60 a (new) (60a) The further development at Union level of solvency models, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet (HBS), is not realistic in practical terms and not effective in terms of costs and benefits, particularly given the diversity of institutions within and across Member States. No quantitative capital requirements - such as Solvency II or Holistic Balance Sheet models derived therefrom - should therefore be developed at the Union level with regard to institutions for occupational retirement provision, as they could potentially decrease the willingness of employers to provide occupational pensions.
source: 567.843
2015/10/20
ECON
303 amendments...
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) The institution’s social function and the triangular relationship between the employee, the employer and the institution shall be fully taken into account, as a guiding principle, in accordance with this Directive;
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) The institution’s social function and the triangular relationship between the employee, the employer and the IORP shall be adequately acknowledged and supported as a guiding principle of the Directive;
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Article 20 and Articles 22 to 37 shall apply only to institutions that operate on a cross-border basis.
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Duty of care Competent authorities of the home Member State shall exercise a duty of care to ensure that the relocation of institutions to another Member State does not constitute a form of regulatory arbitrage, which is for example the case when the reasons for relocation seem to relate to requirements with respect to funding, the governmental framework and investment rules.
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) Home Member States may choose to apply the provisions of Articles 9 to 15, Articles 20 to 23, Articles 25 to 29, Articles 31 to 34, Articles 38 to 53 and Articles 55 to 71 of this Directive to the occupational retirement provision business of asset management companies covered by Directives 2014/91/EU and 2011/61/EU, providing pension schemes where members bear the investment risk.
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 The
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) The home Member State shall ensure that either the competent authorities, or the authorities responsible for supervision of asset management companies covered by Directives 2014/91/EU and 2011/61/EU, as part of their supervisory work, monitor closely the asset management companies’ relevant occupational retirement business.
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 With the exception of Articles
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 With the exception of Articles
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 With the exception of Articles 34 to 37 , Member States may choose not to apply this Directive, in whole or in part, to any institution located in their territories which operates pension schemes which together have less than 100 members in total or that manage assets on management of a value less than EUR 20 million. Subject to Article 2(2), such institutions
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) ‘institution for occupational retirement provision’, or ‘institution’, means an institution, irrespective of its legal form, operating on a funded basis, which is not a financial service provider and is established separately from any sponsoring undertaking or trade for the purpose of providing retirement benefits in the context of an occupational activity on the basis of an agreement or a contract agreed:
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – with self-employed persons,
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) ‘social pension scheme’ means a contract, an agreement, a trust deed or rules stipulating which retirement benefits are granted and the conditions applicable where: (i) the persons to whom the retirement benefit is to be paid do not fund it; (ii) a risk-spreading principle is used; and (iii) the pension participants do not bear the investment risk;
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) ‘
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) ‘home Member State’ means the Member State in which the institution has been
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) ‘
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘key function’, within a system of governance, means a
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new) (qa) ‘Cross-border activity’ means operating a pension scheme governed by the social and labour law relevant to occupational pension schemes, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 593/2008, of a Member State other than the home Member State.
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 Member States shall require institutions located within their territories to limit their activities to retirement-benefit related operations and activities arising therefrom. Institutions may not refuse to offer their services to potential beneficiaries resident in Member States other than those in which the institutions are located.
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 the institution is registered in a national register by the competent authority or authorised by it
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and taking due account of the scale of pension benefits offered by the social-security regimes, Member States may provide that a national minimum pension which cannot fall below the risk- of-poverty threshold be introduced, that the option of longevity and disability cover, provision for surviving dependants and a guarantee of repayment of contributions as additional benefits be offered to members if employers and employees, or their respective representatives, so agree.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to national social and labour law on the organisation of pension systems, including compulsory membership and the outcomes of collective bargaining agreements, Member States shall allow undertakings located within their territories to sponsor institutions which propose to or carry out
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 77 specifying the elements that constitute social pension schemes and justifies mandatory participation. The delegated acts shall not impose funding requirements that are additional to those provided for in this Directive.
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. An institution proposing to carry out
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) othe
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where a competent authority of the
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 Where the competent authority of the
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 5 5. Before the institution starts to carry out a
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 6 6. On receiving the communication referred to in paragraph 5, or if no communication is received from the competent authorities of the
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 7 7. The competent authorities of the
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 8 8. The institution shall be subject to on- going supervision by the competent authorities of the
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 9 9. If, despite the measures taken by the competent authorities of the
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 10 Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 10 10. Member States shall ensure that an institution carrying out
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to national social and labour law, Member States shall allow institutions authorised or registered in their territories to transfer all or a part of their pension schemes to receiving institutions authorised or registered in other Member States.
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 (2) The transfer of all or part of a pension scheme between transferring and receiving institutions authorised or registered in different Member States shall be subject to prior authorisation by the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring institution, after first obtaining the consent of the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving institution. The application for authorisation of the transfer shall be submitted by the
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The transfer of all or part of a pension scheme between transferring and receiving institutions authorised or registered in different Member States shall be subject to prior authorisation by the competent authority of the
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The transfer of all or part of a pension scheme between transferring and receiving institutions authorised or registered in different Member States shall be subject to a duty of care as referred to in Article 3 a and prior authorisation by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving institution. The application for authorisation of the transfer shall be submitted by the receiving institution.
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. Unless national social and labour law on the organisation of pension systems provides otherwise, the transfer and its conditions
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the written agreement between the transferring and the receiving institutions setting out the conditions of the transfer, including the main characteristics of the pension scheme and the description of the transferred assets,
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point d (d) the
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 Where a competent authority of the
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The decisions referred to in the first subparagraph shall be reasoned. Where the competent authority of the
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 6 6. The competent authority of the
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 7 7. Upon receiving the communication referred to in paragraph 6, or if no
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 8 8. Where the receiving institution carries out a
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 8 8. After the transfer is completed, the receiving institution shall be subject to the rules of the Member State in which it is registered or authorised. Where the receiving institution carries out a cross- border activity, Article 12(8) and (9) shall apply.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. None of the provisions of this Directive may apply restrictively where the beneficiaries of an institution include beneficiaries from Member States other than the one in which the institution is located with no sponsorship in those Member States.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Institutions may not require that beneficiaries hold a bank account with the IBAN code of the Member State in which they are located.
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. The calculation of technical provisions shall take place every year. However, the
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. The calculation of the technical provisions shall be executed and certified by an actuary or by another specialist in this field, including an auditor, according to national legislation, on the basis of actuarial methods recognised by the competent authorities of the
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b – introductory part (b) the maximum rates of interest used shall be chosen prudently and determined in accordance with any relevant rules of the
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i (i) a prudent assessment of the yield on the corresponding assets held by the institution
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b – point ii (ii) the current market yields of high
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b – point ii (ii) the market yields of high-quality or government bonds, including ones issued by EU institutions and agencies;
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) In any event, the maximum rates of interest used shall not exceed those in use for long term insurance products in the relevant jurisdictions as published by EIOPA in accordance with Article 77e of Directive 2009/138/EC;
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) where the institution changes the method and basis of calculation of technical provisions, it shall provide a full explanation of the impact of the changes on technical provisions.
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. The
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The Commission shall propose any necessary measures to prevent possible distortions caused by different levels of interest rates and to protect the interest of beneficiaries and members of any scheme.
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The home Member State shall require every institution to have at all times
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The home Member State may allow an institution, for a limited period of time, to have insufficient assets to cover the technical provisions. In this case the competent authorities shall require the institution to adopt a concrete and realisable recovery plan with a clear time line in order to ensure that the requirements of paragraph 1 are met again. The plan shall be subject to the following conditions:
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the institution shall set up a concrete and realisable plan to re-establish the required amount of assets to cover fully the technical provisions in due time. The plan shall be made available to members or, where applicable, to their representatives and
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the institution shall set up a concrete and realisable plan to re-establish the required amount of assets to cover fully the technical provisions in due time. The plan shall be made available to members or, where applicable, to their representatives and/or shall be subject to approval by the competent authorities of the
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) in the event of termination of a pension scheme during the period referred to in the first sentence of this paragraph, the institution shall inform the competent authorities of the
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In the event of cross-border activity as referred to in Article 12, the competent authorities of the home Member State and of the host Member State shall jointly agree on the application of paragraph 2 of this Article and may intervene in accordance with Article 62. To comply with this requirement the home Member State may require ring-fencing of the assets and liabilities. EIOPA may help to settle any disagreements in accordance with Article 19 paragraphs 1 and 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010.
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. In the event of cross-border activity as referred to in Article 12, the technical provisions
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. In the event of cross-border activity as referred to in Article 12, the technical provisions
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. In the event of cross-border activity as referred to in Article 12, the technical provisions shall at all times be fully funded in respect of the total range of pension schemes operated. If these conditions are not met, the competent authorities of the
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 a (new) Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. In order to ensure long-term sustainability of occupational pension provision, Member States shall require of every institution referred to in Article 16(1) which are located in their territories an adequate available solvency margin in respect of its entire business at all times which is at least equal to the requirements in this Directive.
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Upon application, with supporting evidence, by the institution to the competent authority of the
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall require the activities of institutions located in their territories to ensure the intergenerational balance by investing in accordance with the ‘prudent person’ rule and in particular in accordance with the following rules:
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall require institutions located in their territories to i
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) the assets shall be invested in the long- term best
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) the assets shall be invested in the best interests of present and future members and beneficiaries. In the case of a potential conflict of interest, the institution, or the entity which manages its portfolio, shall ensure that the investment is made in the sole interest of members and beneficiaries;
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) in doing so, the institution is empowered to have regard to: (i) the likely long-term consequences of any investment decisions; (ii) the impact of any investment activities on financial stability and the wider economy, as well as on communities and the environment; (iii) environment, social and governance implications as part of the return on investment; (iv) the views, including the social and ethical views, of the beneficiaries;
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) In doing so, institutions may have regard to: - social, societal and environmental benefits - the impact of investment activities on the stability of the financial system - the long term consequences of investment decisions;
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) the assets shall be invested exclusively in simple, unstructured, low- risk financial instruments in order to ensure the stability of the investments in the long term;
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) the ‘prudent person’ rule shall not prevent institutions from taking into account the impact of investment decisions on environmental, social, governance or ethical factors;
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) the assets shall be invested in such a manner as to ensure th
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) the assets shall be
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) investments in
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) investment in derivative instruments
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) investments which expose the institution to a high level of risk and/or low environmental and social level, including investments in infrastructure projects, shall not be permitted;
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) assets shall be directed towards long- term productive investments which have a positive social and environmental impact; Member States may make provision for measures to concentrate investments within their own countries.
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Investment rules shall allow for development of individual pension products within a collective scheme.
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 3 3. The
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 4 Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) investing up to 70 % of the assets covering the technical provisions or of the whole portfolio for schemes in which the members bear the investment risks in shares, negotiable securities treated as shares and corporate bonds admitted to trading on regulated markets, or through multilateral trading facilities or organised trading facilities, and deciding on the relative weight of these securities in their investment portfolio. However, provided that it is prudentially justified, Member States may apply a lower limit to institutions which provide retirement products with a long- term interest rate guarantee, bear the investment risk and themselves provide for the guarantee;
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) investing in instruments that are promoting long-term investment in the real economy in the European Union including the European Fund for Strategic Investments, European Long- term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) or European Social Entrepreneurship Funds (EuSEFs);
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) Investing in instruments that are promoting long-term investment in the real economy in the European Union including the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the European Long-term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) or the European Social Entrepreneurship Funds (EuSEFs);
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States may apply a lower threshold than the threshold provided for in point (a), in particular for institutions which provide retirement products with a long-term interest rate guarantee, bear the investment risk and provide for the guarantee themselves.
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 8 8. The competent authorities of the
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall ask the competent authority to ensure that the costs of asset management and other functions of the pension scheme are public.
Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require all institutions to have in place an effective system of governance which provides for sound and prudent management of their activities. That system shall include an adequate transparent organisational structure with a clear allocation and appropriate segregation of responsibilities and an effective system for ensuring the transmission of information. The system of governance shall be subject to regular internal review. The system of governance shall require environmental, social as well as governance factors related to investment assets to be considered in investment decisions, involve relevant stakeholders and shall be subject to regular internal review.
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall require institutions to have at least two persons who are effectively
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall require institutions to ensure that
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall require institutions to ensure that their management is gender-balanced and that all persons who effectively run the institution or have other key functions fulfil the following requirements when carrying out their tasks:
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their professional qualifications, knowledge and experience are
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) their professional qualifications, knowledge and experience, or those of the advisers on which they rely, are adequate to enable them to ensure a sound and prudent management of the institution and to properly carry out their key functions (requirement to be fit); and
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) they are of good repute and integrity, including demonstrating gender sensitivity (requirement to be proper).
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where at least one of the persons having key functions is a representative of the social partners, Member States shall ensure that the institution can fulfil the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 by means of a fit and proper assessment where all, or a relevant subgroup of, the persons having key functions are evaluated on a collective basis.
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 3 3. Where a Member State requires of its own nationals proof of good repute, proof
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to the role of social partners, Member States shall require institutions to have a sound remuneration policy for
Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Directive 2013/36/EU shall apply to those persons who effectively run institutions for occupational retirement provision so as to ensure a sound remuneration policy. __________________
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Directive 2013/36/EU shall apply to those persons who effectively run institutions for occupational retirement provision so as to ensure a sound remuneration policy.
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Article shall not apply to service providers that fall under Directives 2013/36/EU, 2014/65/EU, 2014/91/EU and 2011/61/EU.
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. Institutions shall regularly disclose publicly relevant information regarding the remuneration policy using specific indicators to link remuneration to fit and proper management, integrity and gender equality unless otherwise provided in the laws, regulations and administrative provisions transposing Directive 95/46/EC
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act applicable to cross- border funds, in accordance with Article 77 specifying:
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point a – indent 1 – the remuneration policy shall be established, implemented and maintained in line with the institution’s
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point a – indent 3 – the remuneration policy shall promote sound and effective risk management and
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point a – indent 3 Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point a – indent 8 – there shall be clear, transparent, gender sensitive and effective governance with regard to remuneration and its oversight.
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The provisions on remuneration in this Article are without prejudice to the rights, where applicable, of the social partners to conclude and enforce collective agreements, in accordance with national law and customs.
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require institutions to incorporate a risk-management function, an internal and external audit function, and, where applicable, an actuarial function. The reporting lines associated with each key function shall ensure the key function’s ability to undertake its duties effectively in an objective, fair, gender equal and independent manner.
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require institutions to incorporate a risk-management function, an internal audit function, an internal control system and, where applicable, an actuarial function. The reporting lines associated with each key
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to the role of social partners in the overall management of institutions,
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to the role of social partners in the overall management of institutions,
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to the role of social partners in the overall management of institutions, the person or organisational unit carrying out the key function shall be different from the one carrying out a similar key function in the sponsoring undertaking.
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to the role of social partners in the overall management of institutions, the person or organisational unit carrying out the key function shall be different from the one carrying out a similar key function in the sponsoring undertaking.
Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 4 Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 6 Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 6 – introductory part 6. The
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) when the person or organisational unit carrying out the key function has detected a risk that the institution is unlikely to comply with a
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 6 – point b (b) when the person or organisational unit carrying out the key function has observed a
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 7 7. The holder of a key function shall inform the competent authority on any finding that has an impact on the protection of members and beneficiaries. Member States shall ensure legal protection of persons informing the competent authority
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. With regard to employees in functions other than those referred to in paragraphs 4 to 7, Member States shall ensure that competent authorities establish effective, reliable and confidential mechanisms to encourage reporting of potential or actual breaches of national provisions transposing this Directive to them. These mechanisms shall include appropriate protection for employees at least against retaliation, discrimination or other types of unfair treatment.
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Member States shall require institutions to have in place appropriate procedures for the employees referred to in paragraph 7a to report breaches internally through a specific, independent, autonomous and confidential channel. Such a channel may also be provided through arrangements provided for by social partners. The same protection as referred to in paragraph 7a shall apply.
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall require institutions to have in place an effective risk-management system comprising strategies, processes and reporting procedures necessary to identify, measure, monitor, manage and report on a continuous basis, to competent authorities and regularly to members and beneficiaries, the risks, at an individual and at an aggregated level, to which they are or could be exposed, and their interdependencies.
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) investment
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) operational and market risk management;
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new) (fa) a qualitative assessment of environmental, social and governance risks associated with the investment portfolio and the management thereof.
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new) (fa) environmental and social risks relating to the investment portfolio and the management thereof.
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new) (fa) the detection and monitoring of new or emerging risks relating to climate change, use of resources and the environment.
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 a (new) Article 26a Internal control system Member States shall require institutions to provide for an effective internal control system. The internal control system shall at least include administrative and accounting procedures, an internal control framework and appropriate reporting obligations at all levels of the institution.
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall require
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) assess the sufficiency
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall require, appropriately to their size, internal organisation and the nature, scope and complexity of their activities, institutions, as part of their risk- management system, to carry out their own risk assessment and to produce a risk evaluation for pensions in order to document that assessment. No quantitative capital requirements (for example Solvency II or holistic balance sheet models derived therefrom) may be imposed, as they could jeopardise the survival of successful collective occupational pension schemes by giving rise to high costs.
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall require the competent authority, having regard to the size and internal organisation of the institution as well as to the nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the institutions concerned, to decide what information is to be covered in a risk assessment.
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the overall funding needs of the institution in accordance with national law;
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the ability to comply with the requirements regarding technical provisions laid down in Article 14 without generating indirect discrimination against women;
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) a qualitative assessment of the sponsor support
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) a qualitative and, where feasible, quantitative assessment of new or emerging risks relating to climate change, use of resources and the environment. In particular, a thorough assessment of the regulatory risk to financial assets resulting from activities, such as fossil fuel extraction and processing where future regulations in line with Union or global policy objectives are likely to substantially diminish the value of those assets.
Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) a qualitative assessment of new or emerging risks relating to climate change, use of resources
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 4 4. The risk
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 4 4. The risk evaluation for pensions shall take into account the need to ensure intergenerational balance and long-term sustainability of occupational pension provision. It shall be an integral part of the operational strategy and shall be taken into account in the strategic decisions of the institution.
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – title Delegated act for the risk evaluation for cross-border pensions
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act applicable to cross- border funds in accordance with Article 77 specifying:
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a directive Article 31 – paragraph 1 Member States shall require every institution located in their territories to draw up and publicly disclose annual accounts and annual reports taking into account each pension scheme operated by the institution and, where applicable, annual accounts and annual reports for each pension scheme. The annual accounts and the annual reports shall give a true and fair view of the institution’s assets, liabilities and financial position, and include disclosure of major investment holdings. The annual accounts and information in the reports shall be consistent, comprehensive, fairly presented and duly approved by authorised persons, in accordance with national law.
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a directive Article 31 – paragraph 1 Member States shall require every institution located in their territories to draw up and make available to members annual accounts and annual reports taking into account each pension scheme operated by the institution and, where applicable, annual accounts and annual reports for each pension scheme. The annual accounts and the annual reports shall give a true and fair view of the institution’s assets, liabilities and financial position. The annual accounts and information in the reports shall be consistent, comprehensive, fairly presented and duly approved by authorised persons, in accordance with national law.
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a directive Article 32 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that every institution located in their territories prepares, publicly discloses and, at least every three years, reviews a written statement of investment-
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a directive Article 32 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that every institution located in their territories prepares and, at least every three years, reviews a written statement of investment- policy principles. That statement is to be revised without delay after any significant change in the investment policy. Member States shall provide for this statement to contain, at least, such matters as the investment risk measurement methods, the risk-management processes implemented and the strategic asset allocation with respect to the nature and duration of pension liabilities and how the investment policy takes environmental, social and governance issues into account. The statement shall be made publicly available on a website.
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a directive Article 32 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that every institution located in their territories prepares and, at least every three years, reviews a written statement of investment- policy principles. That statement is to be revised without delay after any significant change in the investment policy. Member States shall provide for this statement to contain, at least, such matters as the investment risk measurement methods, the risk-management processes implemented and the strategic asset allocation with respect to the nature and duration of pension liabilities. Member States shall ensure that this information is, upon request, made available to members.
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a directive Article 34 – paragraph 1 Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. For each occupational pension scheme in which members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk,
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. For each occupational pension scheme in which members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk, the home Member State
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. For each occupational pension scheme in which members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk, the home Member State shall require the institution to appoint a single depositary for safe-keeping of assets and oversight duties in accordance with Article 36 and 37. Without prejudice to Article 36(5) this requirement will not be applicable to those assets of an institution in as far as this institution has invested these assets directly in one or more entities on whose behalf a depositary for safekeeping of assets and oversight duties of the pension scheme is appointed in accordance with Directive 2011/61/EU or 2014/91/EU.
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States may decide to exempt from this requirement institutions that have outsourced all of their investment management activities to external service providers.
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 2 2. For occupational pension schemes in which the members and beneficiaries do not fully bear the investment risk, the home Member State may require the institution to appoint a depositary for safe-keeping of assets or for safe-keeping of assets and oversight duties in accordance with Articles 36 and 37. Without prejudice to Article 36(5) this requirement will not be applicable to those assets of an institution in as far as this institution has invested these assets directly in one or more entities on whose behalf a depositary for safekeeping of assets and oversight duties of the pension scheme is appointed in accordance with Directive 2011/61/EU or 2014/91/EU.
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – paragraph 8 8. Where no depositary is appointed and when the institution has not invested all pension assets in the financial products covered by Directive 2011/61/EU or 2009/65/EU and no depositary has been appointed in accordance with these Directives, institutions shall make arrangements to prevent and resolve any conflict of interest in the course of tasks otherwise performed by a depositary and an asset manager.
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Where under national law of the home Member State there are no fiduciary obligations imposed on those who effectively run the institution or on those who hold scheme assets, and where no depositary is appointed for the safe
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Where no depositary is appointed for the
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 3 3. Where no depositary is appointed for oversight duties and when the institution has not invested all pension assets in the financial products covered by Directive 2011/61/EU or 2009/65/EU and no depositary has been appointed in accordance with these directives, the institution shall implement procedures which ensure that the tasks, otherwise subject to oversight by depositaries, are being duly performed within the institution.
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established, Member States shall ensure that every institution located in their territories provides prospective members,
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 1 (1) Depending on the nature of the pension scheme established, and after careful consideration of the administrative burden involved and of the benefits to be secured, Member States shall ensure that every institution located in their territories provides prospective members, members and beneficiaries at least the information set out in Articles 39 to 53 and Articles 55 to 58.
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) it shall be regularly updated and adapted to the needs of individual members, in order to take account of differences in comprehension related to gender and age;
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 4 (4) Institutions shall publish the conditions of the pension scheme
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall require institutions to draw up a concise document containing key information for each member (the ‘pension benefit statement’).
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 3 (3) Any material change to the information contained in the pension benefit statement compared to the previous year shall be clearly
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 a (new) Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 a (new) Article 40a Pension Benefit Statement 1. Member States shall require institutions to draw up a document containing key relevant information for each member. The title of the document shall contain the words ‘Pension Benefit Statement’. 2. Member States shall require that the information contained in the pension benefit statement is accurate, fair, clear and updated and sent to each member, free of charge, at least annually. 3. When laying down rules for the pension benefit statement, Member States shall require that it contains the key relevant information for the members, taking into consideration the specific nature of national pension systems and of relevant national social, labour and tax law. 4. Within the framework of this Directive, key relevant information for members shall include: (a) personal details of the member, including a clear indication of the date of the statutory retirement or the date when retirement benefits are due; (b) identification of the institution and identification of the pension scheme of the member; (c) where applicable, any information on full or partial guarantees under the pension scheme. Where no guarantee is provided, this should be indicated. Where a guarantee is provided, the pension benefit statement shall briefly explain the nature of the guarantee and provide information on the current level of financing of the member’s accrued individual entitlements; (d) information on pension projections, taking into consideration the specific nature and organisation of the pension scheme; (e) information on the accumulated entitlements, contributions and costs of the pension scheme, taking into consideration the specific nature and organisation of the pension scheme; (f) information on the investment profile, including a clear indication of the risks borne by the member under best and worst scenarios, taking into consideration the specific nature of the pension scheme; (g) information on the past performance of the pension scheme, warning about the limited value as a guide to future performance, taking into account the specific nature of the pension scheme. 5. Member States shall exchange best practices with regard to the format and the content of the pension benefit statement.
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 a (new) Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 a (new) Article 40a Pension Benefit Statement 1. Within the framework of this Directive, key relevant information for members shall include: (a) personal details of the member, including a clear indication of the date of the statutory retirement or the date when retirement benefits are due; (b) identification of the institution and identification of the pension scheme of the member; (c) where applicable, any information on full or partial guarantees under the pension scheme. Where no guarantee is provided, this should be indicated. Where a guarantee is provided, the pension benefit statement shall briefly explain the nature of the guarantee and provide information on the current level of financing of the member’s accrued individual entitlements; 2. Where the pension scheme does not provide for a given level of benefits the key relevant information for members shall include additionally: (a) information on pension projections, taking into consideration the specific nature and organisation of the pension scheme; (b) information on the accumulated entitlements, contributions and costs of the pension scheme, taking into consideration the specific nature and organisation of the pension scheme; (c) information on the investment profile, taking into consideration the specific nature of the pension scheme; (d) information on the past performance of the pension scheme, taking into account the specific nature of the pension scheme.
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 b (new) Article 40b Requests for additional information 1. Upon request (by a member, a beneficiary or their representatives), the institution shall provide the following additional information: (a) the annual accounts and annual reports referred to in Article 31, or - where an institution is responsible for more than one scheme - the accounts and reports relating to the member’s particular pension scheme; (b) the statement of investment policy principles referred to in Article 32; (c) in circumstances where the member bears the investment risk, the range of investment options (if applicable) and the actual investment portfolio; (d) the arrangements relating to the transfer of pension rights to another institution for occupational retirement provision in the event of termination of the employment relationship.
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a directive Article 41 Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a directive Article 43 Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a directive Article 46 Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a directive Article 47 Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a directive Article 48 Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point d – point i (i) for pension schemes that do not provide for a
Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii (ii) for pension schemes that provide for a
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where the pension scheme provides for a
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the target level of benefits per month at the retirement age under best estimate and worst case assumptions;
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the target level of benefits per month two years before the retirement age under best estimate and worst case assumptions;
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the target level of benefits per month two years after the retirement age under best estimate and worst case assumptions.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 2 Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where the pension scheme does not provide for a
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the expected amount of capital
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the expected amount of capital accumulated until the retirement age under best estimate and worst case assumptions relevant for the scheme;
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the expected amount of capital accumulated until two years after the retirement age under best estimate and worst case assumptions relevant for the scheme;
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4.
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. The
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the annual rate of nominal investment returns and the risk factors referred to in Article 51 paragraph 3(b);
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The worst cases should be based on scenarios for the assumptions that represent extreme but plausible outcomes and approved by the relevant competent authority;
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a directive Article 50 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 For pension schemes where members bear investment risk and where they have a choice between different investment options, the pension benefit statement shall indicate the investment profiles
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. For pension schemes where members bear investment risk and where an investment option is imposed on the member by a specific rule specified in the pension scheme, the pension benefit statement shall indicate where the following additional information shall be provided, where applicable:
Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rules based on the member’s targeted retirement age or the target date for receiving retirement benefits;
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part For pension schemes where members bear investment risk, the pension benefit statement shall contain information about the risk and return profile
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) an explanation of risks which are materially relevant
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) a brief explanation of the actual returns;
Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b b (new) (bb) a statement that the lowest risk profile does not mean a risk-free investment
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 4 Amendment 697 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 5 Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a directive Article 51 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The pension benefit statement shall indicate where the statement of investment principles is available.
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a directive Article 52 Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) where and how to obtain the documents mentioned in Articles 31 and 32.
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 The institution shall ensure that prospective members are informed about all the features of the scheme and any investment options including information on how environmental, climate, social and corporate governance issues are considered in the investment approach and in particular, information about its exposure to assets whose value may be negatively impacted by legislation necessary to meet the Union’s climate targets.
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 1 (1) Institutions shall be required to provide beneficiaries with
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Institutions shall inform beneficiaries of any potential reduction in the level of benefits due, prior to any decision on such a potential reduction.
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 2 2. When a significant level of investment risk is borne by beneficiaries in the pay-out phase, Member States shall ensure that beneficiaries receive appropriate information regularly.
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 2 2. When a significant level of investment risk is borne by beneficiaries in the pay-out
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 1 1. The main objective of prudential supervision is the protection of
Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 1 1. The main objective of prudential supervision is the protection of the rights of members and beneficiaries and the financial stability of the institutions.
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 1 1. The main objective of prudential supervision is the protection of members and beneficiaries and the equitable spread of risks and benefits between generations.
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a directive Article 61 – paragraph 1 1. The competent authorities of the
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a directive Article 62 – paragraph 5 5. In order to safeguard the interests of members and beneficiaries, the competent authorities may transfer the powers which the persons running an institution located in their territories hold in accordance with the law of the
Amendment 719 #
Proposal for a directive Article 63 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) an assessment of the ability of the institution to assess and manage those risks.
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a directive Article 64 – paragraph 2 Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure, in an appropriate manner, the uniform application of this Directive through regular exchanges of information and experience with a view to developing best practices in this sphere and closer cooperation with the involvement of the social partners, and by so doing, preventing distortions of competition and creating the conditions required for unproblematic cross-border membership.
Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) 2a. To further develop occupational pensions systems in the Member States, the Commission shall set up a High Level Group of experts to explore ways in which second pillar retirement savings in the Member States can be increased, including the promotion of the exchange of best practices between the Member States.
Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Given the need to further develop occupational pensions systems in the Member States, the Commission shall establish a High Level Group of experts to explore ways to increase second pillar retirement savings schemes in the Member States, including the promotion of the exchange of best practices between the Member States.
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 1 Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 1 Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 1 Four years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall review this Directive and report on its implementation and effectiveness to the European Parliament and the Council. That review shall assess in particular the application of the rules regarding the calculation of the technical provisions, the funding of technical provisions, regulatory own funds, solvency margins, investment rules and any other aspect relating to the financial solvency situation of the institution. These rules shall respect the specific nature of pension sector.
Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a directive Article 76 – paragraph 1 Directive 2009/138/EC Article 306a – paragraph 1 Where, on the entry into force of this Directive, home Member States applied provisions referred to in Article 4 of Directive …/../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council42, such home Member States may continue to apply the laws, regulations and administrative provisions that had been adopted by them with a view to complying with Articles 1 to
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a directive Article 76 – paragraph 1 Directive 2009/138/EC Article 306a – paragraph 2 Where a
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a directive Article 76 – paragraph 1 Directive 2009/138/EC Article 306a – paragraph 3 By 31 December 2017, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, on whether the period referred to in the first paragraph should be extended, taking account of changes to legislation resulting from Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. _________________ 1aDirective 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a directive Article 77 Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a directive Article 77 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of powers referred to in Article 12, paragraph 1, Article 16a, Article 24(3), Article 30 and Article 54 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a directive Article 77 – paragraph 4 4. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 12, paragraph 1, Article 16a, Article 24(3), Article 30 and Article 54 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a directive Article 77 a (new) Article 77a Assessment of subsidiarity and proportionality By two months after the adoption of this Directive, the Commission shall prepare an assessment on the compliance of this Directive with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. This assessment shall be forwarded to the European Parliament, Council and national parliaments without delay. In the event that the assessment is negative as to this Directive’s compliance with the aforementioned principles, the Commission shall present a proposal for the revision of this Directive, which shall address non-compliance and inconsistencies with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a directive Article 78 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 6(c), (i) to (p), Article 12(4) second and third subparagraph, Article 12(10), Article 13, Article 20(6) and (8), Articles 21 to 30, Article 33, Article 35(1) and (2), Article 35(4) to (7), Article 36 to 38, Articles 39(1) and (3), Articles 40 to 53, Articles 55 to 57, Article 58(1), Articles 59 to 61, Article 63, Article 64(1)(b) to (d) and (f), Articles 65 to 71 of this Directive by
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a directive Article 78 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 6(c), (i) to (p), Article 12(4) second and third subparagraph, Article 12(10), Article 13, Article 20(6) and (8), Articles 21 to 30, Article 33, Article 35(1) and (2), Article 35(4) to (7), Article 36 to 38, Articles 39(1) and (3), Articles 40 to 53, Articles 55 to 57, Article 58(1), Articles 59 to 61, Article 63, Article 64(1)(b) to (d) and (f), Articles 65 to 71 of this Directive by
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a directive Article 79 – paragraph 1 Directive 2003/41/EC, as amended by the Directives listed in Annex I, Part A, is repealed with effect from
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a directive Article 79 a (new) Article 79a Review Four years after the entry into force of this directive, the Commission shall review the adequacy of this Directive from a prudential and governance point of view. In particular the review shall consider whether the European dimension needs to be further strengthened. The review shall also analyse the experience acquired in applying this Directive and its impact on the stability of the institutions. The results of the review shall be communicated to the European Parliament and the Council accompanied, where necessary, by appropriate proposals for amendments.
source: 569.481
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2354)(documentyear:2014)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2354)(documentyear:2014)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE536.213New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-CM-536213_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.448&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-549448_EN.html |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE541.293&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-541293_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.015New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-565015_EN.html |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.843New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-567843_EN.html |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.481New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-569481_EN.html |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=26725&j=0&l=en
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2003/41/EC 2000/0260(COD) Amended by 2018/0179(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2003/41/EC 2000/0260(COD) Amended by 2018/0171(COD) Amended by 2018/0179(COD)
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5/date |
|
committees/6/date |
|
committees/7/date |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
docs/11/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0011&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0011_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0448New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0448_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/00408New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016L2341New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016L2341 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/12 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/title |
Old
Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision. RecastNew
Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs). Recast |
activities/7/docs/0 |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/10 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/5/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/5/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/body |
Old
EPNew
unknown |
activities/3/date |
Old
2016-11-24T00:00:00New
2016-01-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/6 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2016-11-22T00:00:00New
2016-11-24T00:00:00 |
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/6/date |
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00New
2016-11-22T00:00:00 |
activities/6/date |
Old
2016-10-25T00:00:00New
2016-10-04T00:00:00 |
activities/6/date |
Old
2016-07-05T00:00:00New
2016-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/6/date |
Old
2016-06-07T00:00:00New
2016-07-05T00:00:00 |
activities/6/date |
Old
2016-05-10T00:00:00New
2016-06-07T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-01-28T00:00:00New
2016-02-03T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2016-04-12T00:00:00New
2016-05-10T00:00:00 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/4/date |
Old
2016-03-08T00:00:00New
2016-04-12T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2015-12-01T00:00:00New
2016-01-25T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2016-01-19T00:00:00New
2014-03-27T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0167:EN
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2015-11-09T00:00:00New
2015-12-01T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0167:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0167:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0167:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
BARNIER MichelNew
HILL Jonathan |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
53b2df45b819f205b000010fNew
54f901eed1d1c563a7000000 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/name |
Old
RODRIGUEZ-RUBIO TeresaNew
URBÁN CRESPO Miguel |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
53b2df45b819f205b000010fNew
54f901eed1d1c563a7000000 |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/name |
Old
RODRIGUEZ-RUBIO TeresaNew
URBÁN CRESPO Miguel |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
53b2df45b819f205b000010fNew
54f901eed1d1c563a7000000 |
committees/0/shadows/3/name |
Old
RODRIGUEZ-RUBIO TeresaNew
URBÁN CRESPO Miguel |
other/0/commissioner |
Old
BARNIER MichelNew
HILL Jonathan |
activities/4 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0167:EN
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0167:EN
|
activities/1/committees/7 |
|
activities/2/committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fc318d1d1c57f99000000New
4f1ac934b819f25efd00011a |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fc318d1d1c57f99000000New
4f1ac934b819f25efd00011a |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fc318d1d1c57f99000000New
4f1ac934b819f25efd00011a |
activities/1/committees/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/4 |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/15579New
ECON/8/00408 |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/7/15579
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0167
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|