BETA


2014/2055(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the construction of buildings in the Netherlands

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG TANG Paul (icon: S&D S&D) FERNANDES José Manuel (icon: PPE PPE), JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli (icon: ALDE ALDE), ZANNI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion REGI
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2014/11/20
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the building construction industry in the Netherlands.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/814/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction from the Netherlands).

CONTENT: with this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council have decided to mobilise the EGF for an amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in the framework of the 2014 general budget of the European Union.

This amount shall assist the Netherlands following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel in the Netherlands.

Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 ( MFF Regulation 2014-2020 ), the European Parliament and Council have decided to grant the abovementioned amount.

To recall, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 provides that the EGF shall not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million .

2014/10/08
   CSL - Draft budget approved by Council
2014/10/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/09/17
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/09/17
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 602 votes to 70, with 30 abstentions, a resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, providing a total amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist the Netherlands which is facing redundancies in its construction sector.

The resolution recalled that the Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or are made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.

It noted that the Netherlands submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel (with 475 workers targeted for EGF co-funded measures), during the reference period from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. Parliament asked the institutions to speed up mobilisation of the Fund for the amount requested, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, the Netherlands is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation.

Redundancies : Parliament considered that the redundancies were linked to global financial and economic crisis, referring to the observation that the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably, while the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. It also noted that 562 redundancies would further aggravate the unemployment situation in the regions concerned, bearing in mind the substantial rise of redundancies in the construction sector. Members welcomed the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 February 2014.

Package of personalised services : Parliament noted that the coordinated package of personalised services included measures for workers made redundant such as job search assistance and intakes, training and retraining measures, outplacement assistance, and mobility pool.

It also noted that demolition of asbestos was listed amongst the opportunities for training participants for occupations outside the construction sector, and called on the Dutch authorities to ensure that workers participating in this specific training were thoroughly informed of the health and safety risks related to working with asbestos.

Parliament went on to stress the importance of future cross-border initiatives such as border desks or alignment of rules in order to enhance the exchange of information and to stimulate the cross-border mobility of workers. It noted that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF included information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the Dutch authorities confirmed that the eligible actions did not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments.

Mobility and employability of workers : Parliament welcomed the idea of creating a mobility pool, which will provide for flexible deployment of workers with the aim to gain work experience and find work through this instrument. It recalled the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career.

New EGF : Parliament appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants. It noted that the Commission finalised the assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 12 weeks of the receipt of the complete application. It stressed that, in accordance with the EGF Regulation, the assistance provided must be limited to what is necessary to provide solidarity and temporary one-off support for targeted beneficiaries, and would not furthermore replace actions, which were the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements.

Members also welcomed the adoption of the new EGF Regulation which reflected the agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council to:

reintroduce the crisis mobilisation criterion; increase Union financial contribution to 60% of the total estimated cost of proposed measures; increase efficiency for the treatment of EGF applications in the Commission and by the Parliament and the Council by shortening time for assessment and approval; widen eligible actions and beneficiaries by introducing self-employed persons and young people and finance incentives for setting up own businesses.

Documents
2014/09/12
   EP - Budgetary report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Paul TANG (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, providing a total amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist the Netherlands which is facing redundancies in its construction sector.

Members recalled that the Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or are made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.

They noted that the Netherlands submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel (with 475 workers targeted for EGF co-funded measures), during the reference period from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. The committee asked the institutions to speed up mobilisation of the Fund for the amount requested, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, the Netherlands is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation.

Redundancies: Members considered that the redundancies were linked to global financial and economic crisis, referring to the observation that the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably, while the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. They also noted that 562 redundancies would further aggravate the unemployment situation in the regions concerned, bearing in mind the substantial rise of redundancies in the construction sector. They welcomed the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 February 2014.

Package of personalised services : Members noted that the coordinated package of personalised services included measures for workers made redundant such as job search assistance and intakes, training and retraining measures, outplacement assistance, and mobility pool.

They also noted that demolition of asbestos was listed amongst the opportunities for training participants for occupations outside the construction sector, and called on the Dutch authorities to ensure that workers participating in this specific training were thoroughly informed of the health and safety risks related to working with asbestos.

The committee went on to stress the importance of future cross-border initiatives such as border desks or alignment of rules in order to enhance the exchange of information and to stimulate the cross-border mobility of workers. It noted that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF included information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the Dutch authorities confirmed that the eligible actions did not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments.

New EGF: Members appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants. They noted that the Commission finalised the assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 12 weeks of the receipt of the complete application. They stressed that, in accordance with the EGF Regulation, the assistance provided must be limited to what is necessary to provide solidarity and temporary one-off support for targeted beneficiaries, and would not furthermore replace actions, which were the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements.

They also welcomed the adoption of the new EGF Regulation which reflected the agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council to:

reintroduce the crisis mobilisation criterion; increase Union financial contribution to 60% of the total estimated cost of proposed measures; increase efficiency for the treatment of EGF applications in the Commission and by the Parliament and the Council by shortening time for assessment and approval; widen eligible actions and beneficiaries by introducing self-employed persons and young people and finance incentives for setting up own businesses.

Documents
2014/09/11
   EP - Vote in committee
2014/09/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2014/07/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/07/15
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2014/07/15
   EP - TANG Paul (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2014/07/10
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist the Netherlands following redundancies in the building construction industry.

PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) within the annual ceiling of EUR 150 million (2011 prices) over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.

The rules applicable to financial contributions from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 .

In this context, the Commission examined the request for mobilisation of the EGF with a view to assisting the Netherlands and stated that:

The Netherlands : EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction : on 20 February 2014, the Dutch authorities submitted application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the contiguous NUTS level 2 regions of Gelderland and Overijssel in the Netherlands.

The Dutch authorities submitted the application within 12 weeks of the date on which the intervention criteria set out in Regulation were met. This deadline expires on10 July 2014.

To establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis addressed in Regulation (EC) No 546/2009, the Dutch authorities argue that there are several reasons for the negative trends in production and employment in the construction sector and especially the construction of buildings (utility buildings and houses) - all relating to the financial and economic crisis: the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits which reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably; the austerity measures of the government to reduce national debt and budget deficit thus reducing public spending; and the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market, which makes it difficult to sell and buy houses.

The construction sector is highly dependent on the regional domestic market. The negative economic trend caused by the economic and financial crisis and as a consequence the reduction of the public budget programmes leaves the construction sector in a vulnerable position.

Over the period 2008-2013, total production of new houses declined by 61 014 units in the Netherlands. For Overijssel production of new houses fell by 2625 and in Gelderland by 7941.

Background to the request from the Netherlands : the Dutch authorities submitted the application under the intervention criterion of Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a reference period of nine months in enterprises operating in the same economic sector defined at NACE Rev.2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS level 2.

The application relates to:

562 workers made redundant in enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 Division 41 (Construction of buildings) in the contiguous regions of Gelderland (NL 22) and Overijssel (NL 21); the reference period of nine months runs from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013.

These criteria comply with the Regulation.

On the basis of the application from the Netherlands, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services is EUR 1 625 781 .

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: having examined the application in respect of the conditions set out in Article 13(1) of the EGF Regulation, and having taken into account the number of targeted beneficiaries, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 1 625 781 , representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed actions, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application.

The proposed decision to mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management.

At the same time as it presents this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary line for the amount of EUR 1 625 781.

It will also adopt a decision on a financial contribution, by means of an implementing act, which will enter into force on the date at which the European Parliament and the Council adopt the proposed decision to mobilise the EGF.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0005/2014 - Paul Tang - Vote unique #

2014/09/17 Outcome: +: 602, -: 70, 0: 30
IT DE FR ES RO NL PL PT BE AT HU BG CZ EL HR LT IE FI SE SI SK EE LU LV CY MT DK GB
Total
71
91
72
48
28
25
50
20
19
17
20
15
21
20
11
10
9
13
16
8
13
6
6
8
6
6
12
60
icon: PPE PPE
212
2

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
183

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: NI NI
51

Germany NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Latvia EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
14 2014/2055(BUD)
2014/09/04 BUDG 14 amendments...
source: 537.356

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/2
name
NÍ RIADA Liadh
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE536.185
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-536185_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.356
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-537356_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2014-09-12T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2014-0005_EN.html title: A8-0005/2014
summary
events/3
date
2014-09-12T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2014-0005_EN.html title: A8-0005/2014
summary
events/5
date
2014-09-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0020_EN.html title: T8-0020/2014
summary
events/5
date
2014-09-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0020_EN.html title: T8-0020/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: TANG Paul date: 2014-07-15T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2014-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TANG Paul group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0005&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2014-0005_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0020
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0020_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0455 title: COM(2014)0455 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014PC0455:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-07-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: FERNANDES José Manuel group: ALDE name: JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2014-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: TANG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2014-09-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: FERNANDES José Manuel group: ALDE name: JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2014-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: TANG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2014-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0005&language=EN type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading title: A8-0005/2014 body: EP type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
  • date: 2014-09-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24706&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0020 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0020/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-10-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Draft budget approved by Council
  • date: 2014-10-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2014-11-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0814 title: Decision 2014/814 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:333:TOC title: OJ L 333 20.11.2014, p. 0015
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Budget commissioner: -- --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2014-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TANG Paul group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2014-07-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: S&D name: TANG Paul
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
docs
  • date: 2014-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE536.185 title: PE536.185 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2014-09-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.356 title: PE537.356 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0455 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0455 summary: PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist the Netherlands following redundancies in the building construction industry. PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) within the annual ceiling of EUR 150 million (2011 prices) over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework. The rules applicable to financial contributions from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 . In this context, the Commission examined the request for mobilisation of the EGF with a view to assisting the Netherlands and stated that: The Netherlands : EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction : on 20 February 2014, the Dutch authorities submitted application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the contiguous NUTS level 2 regions of Gelderland and Overijssel in the Netherlands. The Dutch authorities submitted the application within 12 weeks of the date on which the intervention criteria set out in Regulation were met. This deadline expires on10 July 2014. To establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis addressed in Regulation (EC) No 546/2009, the Dutch authorities argue that there are several reasons for the negative trends in production and employment in the construction sector and especially the construction of buildings (utility buildings and houses) - all relating to the financial and economic crisis: the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits which reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably; the austerity measures of the government to reduce national debt and budget deficit thus reducing public spending; and the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market, which makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. The construction sector is highly dependent on the regional domestic market. The negative economic trend caused by the economic and financial crisis and as a consequence the reduction of the public budget programmes leaves the construction sector in a vulnerable position. Over the period 2008-2013, total production of new houses declined by 61 014 units in the Netherlands. For Overijssel production of new houses fell by 2625 and in Gelderland by 7941. Background to the request from the Netherlands : the Dutch authorities submitted the application under the intervention criterion of Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a reference period of nine months in enterprises operating in the same economic sector defined at NACE Rev.2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS level 2. The application relates to: 562 workers made redundant in enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 Division 41 (Construction of buildings) in the contiguous regions of Gelderland (NL 22) and Overijssel (NL 21); the reference period of nine months runs from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. These criteria comply with the Regulation. On the basis of the application from the Netherlands, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services is EUR 1 625 781 . BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: having examined the application in respect of the conditions set out in Article 13(1) of the EGF Regulation, and having taken into account the number of targeted beneficiaries, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 1 625 781 , representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed actions, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application. The proposed decision to mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management. At the same time as it presents this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary line for the amount of EUR 1 625 781. It will also adopt a decision on a financial contribution, by means of an implementing act, which will enter into force on the date at which the European Parliament and the Council adopt the proposed decision to mobilise the EGF.
  • date: 2014-07-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-09-11T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-09-12T00:00:00 type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0005&language=EN title: A8-0005/2014 summary: The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Paul TANG (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, providing a total amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist the Netherlands which is facing redundancies in its construction sector. Members recalled that the Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or are made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. They noted that the Netherlands submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel (with 475 workers targeted for EGF co-funded measures), during the reference period from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. The committee asked the institutions to speed up mobilisation of the Fund for the amount requested, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, the Netherlands is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation. Redundancies: Members considered that the redundancies were linked to global financial and economic crisis, referring to the observation that the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably, while the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. They also noted that 562 redundancies would further aggravate the unemployment situation in the regions concerned, bearing in mind the substantial rise of redundancies in the construction sector. They welcomed the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 February 2014. Package of personalised services : Members noted that the coordinated package of personalised services included measures for workers made redundant such as job search assistance and intakes, training and retraining measures, outplacement assistance, and mobility pool. They also noted that demolition of asbestos was listed amongst the opportunities for training participants for occupations outside the construction sector, and called on the Dutch authorities to ensure that workers participating in this specific training were thoroughly informed of the health and safety risks related to working with asbestos. The committee went on to stress the importance of future cross-border initiatives such as border desks or alignment of rules in order to enhance the exchange of information and to stimulate the cross-border mobility of workers. It noted that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF included information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the Dutch authorities confirmed that the eligible actions did not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments. New EGF: Members appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants. They noted that the Commission finalised the assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 12 weeks of the receipt of the complete application. They stressed that, in accordance with the EGF Regulation, the assistance provided must be limited to what is necessary to provide solidarity and temporary one-off support for targeted beneficiaries, and would not furthermore replace actions, which were the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements. They also welcomed the adoption of the new EGF Regulation which reflected the agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council to: reintroduce the crisis mobilisation criterion; increase Union financial contribution to 60% of the total estimated cost of proposed measures; increase efficiency for the treatment of EGF applications in the Commission and by the Parliament and the Council by shortening time for assessment and approval; widen eligible actions and beneficiaries by introducing self-employed persons and young people and finance incentives for setting up own businesses.
  • date: 2014-09-17T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24706&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-09-17T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0020 title: T8-0020/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 602 votes to 70, with 30 abstentions, a resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, providing a total amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist the Netherlands which is facing redundancies in its construction sector. The resolution recalled that the Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or are made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis and to assist their reintegration into the labour market. It noted that the Netherlands submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel (with 475 workers targeted for EGF co-funded measures), during the reference period from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. Parliament asked the institutions to speed up mobilisation of the Fund for the amount requested, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, the Netherlands is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation. Redundancies : Parliament considered that the redundancies were linked to global financial and economic crisis, referring to the observation that the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably, while the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. It also noted that 562 redundancies would further aggravate the unemployment situation in the regions concerned, bearing in mind the substantial rise of redundancies in the construction sector. Members welcomed the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 February 2014. Package of personalised services : Parliament noted that the coordinated package of personalised services included measures for workers made redundant such as job search assistance and intakes, training and retraining measures, outplacement assistance, and mobility pool. It also noted that demolition of asbestos was listed amongst the opportunities for training participants for occupations outside the construction sector, and called on the Dutch authorities to ensure that workers participating in this specific training were thoroughly informed of the health and safety risks related to working with asbestos. Parliament went on to stress the importance of future cross-border initiatives such as border desks or alignment of rules in order to enhance the exchange of information and to stimulate the cross-border mobility of workers. It noted that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF included information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the Dutch authorities confirmed that the eligible actions did not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments. Mobility and employability of workers : Parliament welcomed the idea of creating a mobility pool, which will provide for flexible deployment of workers with the aim to gain work experience and find work through this instrument. It recalled the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career. New EGF : Parliament appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants. It noted that the Commission finalised the assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 12 weeks of the receipt of the complete application. It stressed that, in accordance with the EGF Regulation, the assistance provided must be limited to what is necessary to provide solidarity and temporary one-off support for targeted beneficiaries, and would not furthermore replace actions, which were the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements. Members also welcomed the adoption of the new EGF Regulation which reflected the agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council to: reintroduce the crisis mobilisation criterion; increase Union financial contribution to 60% of the total estimated cost of proposed measures; increase efficiency for the treatment of EGF applications in the Commission and by the Parliament and the Council by shortening time for assessment and approval; widen eligible actions and beneficiaries by introducing self-employed persons and young people and finance incentives for setting up own businesses.
  • date: 2014-10-08T00:00:00 type: Draft budget approved by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2014-10-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2014-11-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the building construction industry in the Netherlands. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/814/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction from the Netherlands). CONTENT: with this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council have decided to mobilise the EGF for an amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in the framework of the 2014 general budget of the European Union. This amount shall assist the Netherlands following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel in the Netherlands. Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 ( MFF Regulation 2014-2020 ), the European Parliament and Council have decided to grant the abovementioned amount. To recall, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 provides that the EGF shall not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million . docs: title: Decision 2014/814 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0814 title: OJ L 333 20.11.2014, p. 0015 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:333:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/8/00795
New
  • BUDG/8/00795
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0814
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0814
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.07 Building industry
  • 4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
  • 8.70.54 2014 budget
New
3.40.07
Building industry
4.15.05
Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
8.70.60
Previous annual budgets
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014PC0455:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014PC0455:EN
activities/4/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24706&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
procedure/subject/1
Old
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations
New
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
activities/7/text
  • PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the building construction industry in the Netherlands.

    LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/814/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction from the Netherlands).

    CONTENT: with this Decision, the European Parliament and the Council have decided to mobilise the EGF for an amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in the framework of the 2014 general budget of the European Union.

    This amount shall assist the Netherlands following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel in the Netherlands.

    Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 (MFF Regulation 2014-2020), the European Parliament and Council have decided to grant the abovementioned amount.

    To recall, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

    Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 provides that the EGF shall not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million.

activities/7
date
2014-11-20T00:00:00
docs
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0814
title
Decision 2014/814
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/6
date
2014-10-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
End of procedure in Parliament
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
committees/0/shadows/3
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
committees/0/shadows/3
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
activities/5
date
2014-10-08T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Draft budget approved by Council
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Paul TANG (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund,providing a total amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist the Netherlands which is facing redundancies in its construction sector.

    Members recalled that the Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or are made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.

    They noted that the Netherlands submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel (with 475 workers targeted for EGF co-funded measures), during the reference period from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. The committee asked the institutions to speed up mobilisation of the Fund for the amount requested, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, the Netherlands is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation.

    Redundancies: Members considered that the redundancies were linked to global financial and economic crisis, referring to the observation that the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably, while the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. They also noted that 562 redundancies would further aggravate the unemployment situation in the regions concerned, bearing in mind the substantial rise of redundancies in the construction sector. They welcomed the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 February 2014.

    Package of personalised services: Members noted that the coordinated package of personalised services included measures for workers made redundant such as job search assistance and intakes, training and retraining measures, outplacement assistance, and mobility pool.

    They also noted that demolition of asbestos was listed amongst the opportunities for training participants for occupations outside the construction sector, and called on the Dutch authorities to ensure that workers participating in this specific training were thoroughly informed of the health and safety risks related to working with asbestos.

    The committee went on to stress the importance of future cross-border initiatives such as border desks or alignment of rules in order to enhance the exchange of information and to stimulate the cross-border mobility of workers. It noted that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF included information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the Dutch authorities confirmed that the eligible actions did not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments.

    New EGF: Members appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants. They noted that the Commission finalised the assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 12 weeks of the receipt of the complete application. They stressed that, in accordance with the EGF Regulation, the assistance provided must be  limited to what is necessary to provide solidarity and temporary one-off support for targeted beneficiaries, and would not furthermore replace actions, which were the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements.

    They also welcomed the adoption of the new EGF Regulation which reflected the agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council to:

    • reintroduce the crisis mobilisation criterion;
    • increase Union financial contribution to 60% of the total estimated cost of proposed measures;
    • increase efficiency for the treatment of EGF applications in the Commission and by the Parliament and the Council by shortening time for assessment and approval;
    • widen eligible actions and beneficiaries by introducing self-employed persons and young people and
    • finance incentives for setting up own businesses.
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 602 votes to 70, with 30 abstentions, a resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund,providing a total amount of EUR 1 625 781 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist the Netherlands which is facing redundancies in its construction sector.

    The resolution recalled that the Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or are made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.

    It noted that the Netherlands submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the regions of Gelderland and Overijssel (with 475 workers targeted for EGF co-funded measures), during the reference period from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013. Parliament asked the institutions to speed up mobilisation of the Fund for the amount requested, agreeing with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, the Netherlands is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation.

    Redundancies: Parliament considered that the redundancies were linked to global financial and economic crisis, referring to the observation that the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably, while the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market makes it difficult to sell and buy houses. It also noted that 562 redundancies would further aggravate the unemployment situation in the regions concerned, bearing in mind the substantial rise of redundancies in the construction sector. Members welcomed the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 February 2014.

    Package of personalised services: Parliament noted that the coordinated package of personalised services included measures for workers made redundant such as job search assistance and intakes, training and retraining measures, outplacement assistance, and mobility pool.

    It also noted that demolition of asbestos was listed amongst the opportunities for training participants for occupations outside the construction sector, and called on the Dutch authorities to ensure that workers participating in this specific training were thoroughly informed of the health and safety risks related to working with asbestos.

    Parliament went on to stress the importance of future cross-border initiatives such as border desks or alignment of rules in order to enhance the exchange of information and to stimulate the cross-border mobility of workers. It noted that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF included information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the Dutch authorities confirmed that the eligible actions did not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments.

    Mobility and employability of workers: Parliament welcomed the idea of creating a mobility pool, which will provide for flexible deployment of workers with the aim to gain work experience and find work through this instrument. It recalled the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career.

    New EGF: Parliament appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants. It noted that the Commission finalised the assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 12 weeks of the receipt of the complete application. It stressed that, in accordance with the EGF Regulation, the assistance provided must be limited to what is necessary to provide solidarity and temporary one-off support for targeted beneficiaries, and would not furthermore replace actions, which were the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements.

    Members also welcomed the adoption of the new EGF Regulation which reflected the agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council to:

    • reintroduce the crisis mobilisation criterion;
    • increase Union financial contribution to 60% of the total estimated cost of proposed measures;
    • increase efficiency for the treatment of EGF applications in the Commission and by the Parliament and the Council by shortening time for assessment and approval;
    • widen eligible actions and beneficiaries by introducing self-employed persons and young people and
    • finance incentives for setting up own businesses.
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0020 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0020/2014
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
activities/3
date
2014-09-12T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0005&language=EN type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading title: A8-0005/2014
body
EP
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2014-09-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3/date
Old
2014-09-18T00:00:00
New
2014-09-17T00:00:00
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old
New

PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist the Netherlands following redundancies in the building construction industry.

PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) within the annual ceiling of EUR 150 million (2011 prices) over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.

The rules applicable to financial contributions from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

In this context, the Commission examined the request for mobilisation of the EGF with a view to assisting the Netherlands and stated that:

The Netherlands: EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction: on 20 February 2014, the Dutch authorities submitted application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in 89 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 division 41 ('Construction of buildings') in the contiguous NUTS level 2 regions of Gelderland and Overijssel in the Netherlands.

The Dutch authorities submitted the application within 12 weeks of the date on which the intervention criteria set out in Regulation were met. This deadline expires on10 July 2014.

To establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis addressed in Regulation (EC) No 546/2009, the Dutch authorities argue that there are several reasons for the negative trends in production and employment in the construction sector and especially the construction of buildings (utility buildings and houses) - all relating to the financial and economic crisis: the policy of banks to implement more stringent rules for the provision of mortgages and credits  which reduced the provision of mortgages and credits considerably; the austerity measures of the government to reduce national debt and budget deficit  thus reducing public spending; and the sharp decline of prices and values on the housing market, which makes it difficult to sell and buy houses.

The construction sector is highly dependent on the regional domestic market. The negative economic trend caused by the economic and financial crisis and as a consequence the reduction of the public budget programmes leaves the construction sector in a vulnerable position.

Over the period 2008-2013, total production of new houses declined by 61 014 units in the Netherlands. For Overijssel production of new houses fell by 2625 and in Gelderland by 7941.

Background to the request from the Netherlands: the Dutch authorities submitted the application under the intervention criterion of Article 4(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a reference period of nine months in enterprises operating in the same economic sector defined at NACE Rev.2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS level 2.

The application relates to:

  • 562 workers made redundant in enterprises operating in the NACE Rev.2 Division 41 (Construction of buildings) in the contiguous regions of Gelderland (NL 22) and Overijssel (NL 21);
  • the reference period of nine months runs from 1 March 2013 to 1 December 2013.

These criteria comply with the Regulation.

On the basis of the application from the Netherlands, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services is EUR 1 625 781.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: having examined the application in respect of the conditions set out in Article 13(1) of the EGF Regulation, and having taken into account the number of targeted beneficiaries, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 1 625 781, representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed actions, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application.

The proposed decision to mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management.

At the same time as it presents this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary line for the amount of EUR 1 625 781.

It will also adopt a decision on a financial contribution, by means of an implementing act, which will enter into force on the date at which the European Parliament and the Council adopt the proposed decision to mobilise the EGF.

activities/0/docs/0/text
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FERNANDES José Manuel
  • group: ALDE name: JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli
  • group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
  • group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FERNANDES José Manuel
  • group: ALDE name: JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli
  • group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
  • group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco
activities
  • date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0455 celexid: CELEX:52014PC0455:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2014)0455 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-07-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2014-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: TANG Paul body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2014-09-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2014-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: TANG Paul
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/8/00795
reference
2014/2055(BUD)
title
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the construction of buildings in the Netherlands
geographical_area
Netherlands
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Mobilisation of funds
type
BUD - Budgetary procedure
subject