BETA


2014/2078(DEC) 2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT PARGNEAUX Gilles (icon: S&D S&D) PIEPER Markus (icon: PPE PPE), PIEPER Markus (icon: PPE PPE), CZARNECKI Ryszard (icon: ECR ECR), VISTISEN Anders Primdahl (icon: ECR ECR), VISTISEN Anders Primdahl (icon: ECR ECR), GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE), GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), JÁVOR Benedek (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), ALIOT Louis (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion PETI
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2015/09/30
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Parliament for the financial year 2013.

NON LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2015/1614 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section I — European Parliament.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to its President for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2013.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 29 April 2015 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 29 April 2015).

Amongst Parliament’s main observations, the latter noted that Parliament's final appropriations totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07% of heading V (Administration) of the Multiannual Financial Framework.

Parliament welcomed the fact that the Court of Auditors’ audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament, but it was concerned about maintaining the security of Parliament's buildings and their immediate surroundings. It stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members, and called for more clarity on this issue.

Lastly, Members stressed that in order to create long-term savings in the Union budget, Parliament and Council must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat .

2015/04/29
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/04/29
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament decided by 545 votes to 148, with 6 abstentions to grant discharge to its President in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Parliament for the financial year 2013.

In a resolution adopted by 573 votes to 109, with 11 abstentions, Parliament recalled that Parliament's final appropriations for 2013 totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07% of heading Administration of the Multiannual Financial Framework. In 2013, 99.02% of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 0.8%. EUR 54 000 000 was transferred from provisional appropriation headings and from other sources so as to help fund the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building (KAD), in Luxembourg.

Centralised activities of the European Parliament and a single seat : Plenary recalled that according to the Court of Auditors, the potential savings for the Union budget would be about EUR 114 million a year if Parliament centralised its activities . It stressed that Parliament and the Council, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget, must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as stated by Parliament in several previous resolutions.

Court of Auditors' opinions on the reliability of the 2013 accounts : Parliament commended the fact that the audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament. It reaffirmed that Parliament’s governing bodies and administration were held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it was therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal.

Election campaign 2014 : Parliament is deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17.8 million to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42.54% (2009: 43%). It encouraged the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States.

Parliament noted that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey showed that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23% of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general. Parliament was convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament .

Staffing : Parliament asked to be provided, by the end of 2015, with year-on-year breakdowns of trends in staffing levels and staff costs, by grade and level of management. It asked Parliament’s administration to state whether comparable studies of the administrations of international parliamentary assemblies could contain important lessons for Parliament’s work. It noted that work outsourced to specialists should also be included in the reports to promote the ethos of transparency, while also serving the best interests of constituents. It noted with concern that the large number of staff based in the office of the President of the European Parliament, which amounts to 35 staff, including two drivers and a personal usher, is highly questionable and that this sets a bad example for cost reduction and fiscal responsibility within Parliament .

Security and Safety : Parliament took note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety and recalled that the internalisation of Parliament's security services had generated savings of EUR 195 000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016. It considered that the Belgian Government should make a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security , given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory.

Greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members : Parliament welcomed the fact that Members must be more transparent about the on-the-side activities they do while in public office. It insisted that a more detailed declaration template for Members would help to increase transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interests. It also stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members and called on the Bureau to work on the definition of more precise rules regarding the accountability of expenditures authorised under this allowance, without causing additional costs to Parliament. Parliament was also concerned with the lack of ex post verification of the use of service cars by Members and questioned the availability of two service cars for the President of Parliament .

Administration and management of the European Parliament : Parliament made a series of recommendations concerning certain DGs, with particular reference to the following:

Directorate-General for Communication : Parliament commented on more information on (i) the multiannual grants programme 2012 to 2014, aimed at raising awareness on Parliament's role, and costing some EUR 14 500 000, asking for a full breakdown of all the grants for communication projects funded; (ii) the budget for the EuroparlTV at EUR 5 000 000 in 2014, appreciating that the performance of the service had been improved; (iii) the expenditure on the LUX Prize in 2013 amounted to EUR 448 000. On this issue, Parliament called for a representative survey of Members to be conducted by the end of 2015 to determine whether the LUX Prize is well known and how, if at all, it is viewed in their respective Member State; (iv) Parliament’s new logo and the lack of transparency regarding its use. Directorate-General Personnel , with Parliament deeply regretting the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to help Parliamentary Assistants in cases of harassment and irregular layoffs. It called for the names of the service providers and the services provided to the Member to be made accessible to the public on the homepage of the Members of Parliament, next to the data on the APAs and the local assistants; Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological support : Parliament noted (i) the process of the internalisation of staff in the Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support and the promised increased level of expertise among the staff in the IT area; (ii) the problem of personal and confidential individual mail-boxes of selected Members, parliamentary assistants and officials which were compromised after Parliament had been subject to a hacker attack.

Parliament also made a series of recommendations on Parliament’s policies on contracts and calls for tenders and negotiated procedures and the issue of greening Parliament. Lastly, as regards the financing of political parties, plenary did not accept the committee’s position which called for a gradual reduction, up to the eventual abolition, of contributions to European political parties from Parliament’s budget.

Documents
2015/04/29
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/04/28
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/03/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gilles PARGNEAUX (S&D, FR) and called on the European Parliament to give discharge to its President in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court for the financial year 2013.

Parliament’s budgetary and financial management: Members noted that Parliament's final appropriations for 2013 totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07 % of heading Administration of the Multiannual Financial Framework. In 2013, 99.02 % of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 0.8%. EUR 54 000 000 was transferred from provisional appropriation headings and from other sources so as to help fund the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building (KAD), in Luxembourg.

Court of Auditors' opinions on the reliability of the 2013 accounts: the committee commended the fact that the audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament. It reaffirmed that Parliament’s governing bodies and administration were held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it was therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal.

Election campaign 2014: Members were deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17 800 000 to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42.54 % (2009: 43 %). They encouraged the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States. They noted that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey showed that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23 % of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general. Members were convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament .

Security and Safety: Members took note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety and recalled that the internalisation of Parliament's security services had generated savings of EUR 195 000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016. They considered that the Belgian Government should make a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security , given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory.

Greater transparency: the committee welcomed the fact that Members must be more transparent about the on-the-side activities they do while in public office. It was of the opinion that a more detailed declaration template for Members would help to increase transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interests. It also stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members. It regretted that until now the GEA was considered as a lump-sum amount and that there were no precise rules for the expenditures that might be covered by the allowance.

Administration and management of the European Parliament: Members made a series of recommendations concerning certain DGs, with particular reference to the following:

· Directorate-General for Communication: Members commented on more information on (i) the multiannual grants programme 2012 to 2014, aimed at raising awareness on Parliament's role, and costing some EUR 14 500 000, asking for a full breakdown of all the grants for communication projects funded; (ii) the budget for the EuroparlTV at EUR 5 000 000 in 2014, appreciating that the performance of the service had been improved; (iii) the expenditure on the LUX Prize in 2013 amounted to EUR 448 000 but considering that the Prize was not a core activity of Parliament and questioning its relevance; (iv) Parliament’s new logo and the lack of transparency regarding its use.

· Directorate-General Personnel , with Members deeply regretting the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to help Parliamentary Assistants in cases of harassment and irregular layoffs;

· Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological support: Members noted (i) the process of the internalisation of staff in the Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support and the promised increased level of expertise among the staff in the IT area; (ii) the problem of personal and confidential individual mail-boxes of selected Members, parliamentary assistants and officials which were compromised after Parliament had been subject to a hacker attack.

Lastly, Members made a series of recommendations on Parliament’s policies on contracts and calls for tenders and negotiated procedures and the issue of greening Parliament.

Documents
2015/03/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/03/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/02/05
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/01/30
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Details

On the basis of the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the European Union institutions in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013 .

The Council welcomes the fact that, as in previous years, the administrative and related expenditure of the institutions and bodies of the European Union remained free from material error and that their examined control systems were assessed as effective .

However, the Council points out that, according to the Court, the estimated error rate of this policy group increased from 0% to 1% . The Council takes note that 10% of the audited sample of transactions were affected by error.

The Council welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses identified by the Court.

Documents
2014/10/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/09/08
   EP - PARGNEAUX Gilles (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2014/07/30
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Parliament .

Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2013 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title IX of this Financial Regulation.

(1) Purpose : the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2013 , including the different expenses of the European institutions. It should be recalled that only the Commission budget contains administrative appropriations and operating appropriations. The other Institutions have only administrative appropriations.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

Discharge procedure : the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting discharge, Parliament may make observations which it considers important and often recommends the Commission and the other institutions to take actions concerning these matters.

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: (i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; (ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and (iii) buildings.

The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

(2) Implementation of the European Parliament’s appropriations for the financial year 2013 : the document comprises a series of detailed annexes, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. As regards the expenditure of the European Parliament, the table on the financial and budgetary management of this institution states that the final appropriations amounted to EUR 1.857 billion, committed to 98.6%. Further information concerning the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget is drawn from the Report on the budgetary and financial management of the European Parliament for 2013 .

(3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions : in more general and political terms, the implementation of the Parliament’s budget in 2013 was marked by the continuation of action, begun in 2011, to bring about structural improvements in order to give Parliament all the resources it needs to play its role in the legislative process to the full and enable it to capitalise to the full on the enhanced powers conferred on it by the Treaty of Lisbon.

The institution also continued to implement multiannual programmes to rationalise and modernise key sectors of its administration, particularly in the field of security, and undertook significant development of its information and communication policy with a view to the 2014 elections .

The document highlighted that the institutional changes arising from Croatia’s accession were completed without any significant difficulties.

More technically, the major projects implemented by Parliament in 2013 may be summarised as follows:

continuation of institutional changes related to the Lisbon Treaty, including : (i) support for research; (ii) knowledge management; (iii) issues relating to external policy co-decision procedure and consent; (iv) improving plenary sitting services; communications strategy and preparing for the 2014 elections : (i) centrally organised activities in EP and decentralised activities in the Member States; (ii) EYE (European Youth Event to raise awareness of European identity); (iii) the continuation of the House of European History project; (iv) improving services to visitors; further institutional changes arising from the accession of Croatia ; continuing to implement the multiannual programmes to rationalise and modernise key parts of Parliament’s Administration : (i) building/property policy (planning permission granted for the construction of Trebel building in Brussels, continuing work on the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg, negotiations for a new building in Sofia (BG); temporary closure of zone A of the Paul-Henri Spaak in Brussels following the discovery of cracks in three of the ceiling beams in the Chamber roof during inspections in September 2012 as part of the new policy on maintenance and renovation; (ii) environmental policy; (iii) catering policy with a revision of costing of meals in restaurants and canteens; (iv) modernisation of information technologies/security; (iv) relations with national parliaments; (v) further restructuring of the security services; other technical modernisation measures (in particular assistance to Members and archive management).

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Décision (ensemble du texte) #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 545, -: 148, 0: 6
DE ES RO PT IT FR SE HU NL BG BE IE FI AT EL LT CZ HR SI SK LU LV EE CY PL MT DK GB
Total
91
52
32
20
71
70
18
19
26
14
20
10
12
18
20
9
21
11
8
13
6
6
6
6
48
6
11
54
icon: PPE PPE
210
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
184

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

4

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 15rev #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 597, -: 84, 0: 18
DE IT GB ES PL NL CZ BE SE AT HU EL PT RO SK FI HR DK BG IE LT SI LV EE CY MT LU FR
Total
91
71
54
52
48
26
20
20
18
18
19
20
20
32
13
12
11
11
14
10
9
8
7
6
6
6
6
70
icon: PPE PPE
210
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
184

Netherlands S&D

3
4

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

France ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 29/1 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 688, -: 8, 0: 3
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO CZ PT NL EL HU SE AT BG BE SK HR DK IE FI SI LT LV LU EE CY MT
Total
91
70
71
54
52
48
32
21
20
26
20
19
18
18
14
19
13
11
11
10
12
8
9
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
210
3
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
184

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
64

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 7/1 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 528, -: 149, 0: 20
GB FR DE PL ES NL IT SE CZ BE EL HU BG FI AT IE HR SK PT SI LT LV DK LU EE CY MT RO
Total
53
70
91
48
52
26
70
18
21
20
20
19
14
12
18
10
11
13
20
8
9
7
11
6
6
6
6
31
icon: PPE PPE
211

Ireland PPE

Abstain (1)

4
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
63

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

2

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: S&D S&D
183

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 7/2 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 403, -: 215, 0: 75
PL FR GB DE ES IT HU EL SE SK NL IE SI CZ AT LV HR PT BE LU EE BG FI MT CY DK LT RO
Total
48
69
54
88
52
71
18
20
18
13
26
10
8
21
18
7
11
20
20
6
6
14
12
6
6
11
8
31
icon: PPE PPE
210

Ireland PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
46

Poland NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

France Verts/ALE

For (1)

6

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
181

Hungary S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

4

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Lithuania S&D

1

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 21rev #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 576, -: 74, 0: 48
DE FR PL GB IT ES RO PT CZ BE HU BG SK AT EL NL FI HR DK LT IE SI SE LV MT LU EE CY
Total
90
70
48
54
71
52
31
20
21
20
19
14
13
18
20
26
12
11
11
9
10
8
18
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
210
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
184
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
64

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

2

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 45 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: -: 346, +: 341, 0: 9
GB NL ES BE FR SE DK EL FI EE CZ IE LT LU AT CY LV HR BG SI SK PT MT HU IT RO DE PL
Total
54
25
52
20
70
18
11
20
12
6
21
10
9
6
18
6
7
11
14
8
13
20
6
18
71
31
90
48
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
47

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1
icon: S&D S&D
184

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Malta S&D

3
4
icon: PPE PPE
209

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 46 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 481, -: 201, 0: 12
GB ES DE FR NL IT SE EL HU IE SK CZ AT BE DK PL PT SI HR LV FI CY LU EE BG MT LT RO
Total
54
52
91
69
26
69
17
20
19
10
13
21
18
20
11
47
20
8
11
7
12
6
6
6
14
6
9
31
icon: PPE PPE
210

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
46

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
181

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Belgium S&D

4

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 56 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 641, 0: 38, -: 16
DE IT ES FR GB PL RO CZ BE HU AT NL PT SE BG SK FI EL HR DK LT IE SI LV LU EE CY MT
Total
90
71
52
68
54
48
31
21
20
19
18
26
20
18
14
13
12
20
11
11
9
9
8
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
210
2
3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
184

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
64

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
45

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Poland NI

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

4

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 28S #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 444, -: 215, 0: 30
DE FR RO IT ES HU PL PT AT CZ SK BE LU SI MT LV HR CY BG EL LT FI IE EE NL SE DK GB
Total
90
69
31
69
52
19
47
20
18
21
13
20
6
8
6
6
11
6
14
18
9
12
10
6
26
17
11
53
icon: PPE PPE
208

Luxembourg PPE

3
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

5
icon: NI NI
46

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 64 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 663, 0: 27, -: 2
DE IT GB ES PL FR RO NL CZ BE PT EL HU AT SE BG SK FI DK HR IE SI LT LV LU EE CY MT
Total
90
69
54
52
48
69
31
26
20
20
20
20
19
18
17
14
13
12
11
10
10
8
9
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
206

Ireland PPE

Abstain (1)

4
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
183

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
64

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
46

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Netherlands NI

4

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 23 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: -: 475, +: 199, 0: 15
GB NL SE DK IE CY LV PL LU EE MT SK EL LT BE AT SI HR FI BG PT CZ HU FR IT RO ES DE
Total
52
26
17
10
10
6
7
48
6
6
6
13
20
9
20
18
8
11
11
14
20
20
19
69
70
31
52
89
icon: ECR ECR
63

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2
icon: NI NI
47

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
183

Netherlands S&D

3

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
205

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 78/1 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 671, -: 18, 0: 5
DE IT FR ES GB RO NL CZ BE PT EL HU AT SE PL BG SK FI HR DK IE SI LV LT LU EE CY MT
Total
90
70
70
52
54
31
26
21
20
20
20
19
18
17
48
14
13
11
11
11
10
8
7
8
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
208
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
184

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - § 78/2 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 637, -: 45, 0: 9
DE IT FR ES GB RO NL CZ BE HU AT PT SE BG EL SK FI HR IE DK SI LT LV EE CY MT LU PL
Total
88
70
70
52
53
31
26
21
20
19
18
19
17
14
20
13
11
11
10
11
8
9
7
6
6
6
6
48
icon: PPE PPE
207
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
184

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
62

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 26 #

2015/04/29 Outcome: -: 431, +: 226, 0: 31
ES GB IE SE BE DK EE EL CY LV LU SK LT MT FI SI HR AT PT CZ IT HU NL BG PL FR RO DE
Total
52
53
10
16
20
11
6
20
6
7
6
13
9
5
11
8
11
17
20
21
70
19
26
14
48
70
30
88
icon: ECR ECR
63

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
47

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

4

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

4

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
181

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

4
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Lithuania S&D

2

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Am 17rev #

2015/04/29 Outcome: -: 480, +: 193, 0: 21
GB DK NL IE CY SK LU FI EL EE MT CZ LT LV SI HR SE BE AT BG PT FR IT HU RO ES PL DE
Total
54
11
26
10
6
13
5
11
20
6
6
21
9
7
8
11
17
20
18
14
20
70
70
19
31
52
48
90
icon: NI NI
47

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Spain NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
184
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
208

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux - Résolution #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 573, -: 109, 0: 11
DE IT ES RO FR PT AT CZ SE HU NL BG FI BE IE EL HR PL SI LT LV SK EE CY MT LU DK GB
Total
90
69
52
31
70
20
18
21
17
19
26
14
11
20
10
20
11
48
8
9
7
13
6
6
6
5
11
54
icon: PPE PPE
208
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
183

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

4

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
63

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
110 2014/2078(DEC)
2015/03/09 CONT 110 amendments...
source: 549.348

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.551
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-537551_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.348
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-549348_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2015-03-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0082_EN.html title: A8-0082/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-03-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0082_EN.html title: A8-0082/2015
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-04-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0121_EN.html title: T8-0121/2015
summary
events/6
date
2015-04-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0121_EN.html title: T8-0121/2015
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2014-09-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0082&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0082_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0121
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0121_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2014-09-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2014-09-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/0
date
2014-07-30T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2014-07-30T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
activities
  • date: 2014-07-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510 title: COM(2014)0510 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0510:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIEPER Markus group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ECR name: VISTISEN Anders Primdahl group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: NI name: ALIOT Louis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-03-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIEPER Markus group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ECR name: VISTISEN Anders Primdahl group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: NI name: ALIOT Louis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-03-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0082&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0082/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25517&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0121 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0121/2015 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2014-09-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2014-09-08T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2015-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5303%2F15&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05303/2015 summary: On the basis of the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the European Union institutions in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013 . The Council welcomes the fact that, as in previous years, the administrative and related expenditure of the institutions and bodies of the European Union remained free from material error and that their examined control systems were assessed as effective . However, the Council points out that, according to the Court, the estimated error rate of this policy group increased from 0% to 1% . The Council takes note that 10% of the audited sample of transactions were affected by error. The Council welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses identified by the Court. type: Document attached to the procedure body: CSL
  • date: 2015-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.551 title: PE537.551 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.348 title: PE549.348 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2014-07-30T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf title: COM(2014)0510 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Parliament . Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2013 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title IX of this Financial Regulation. (1) Purpose : the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2013 , including the different expenses of the European institutions. It should be recalled that only the Commission budget contains administrative appropriations and operating appropriations. The other Institutions have only administrative appropriations. The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management. Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues: accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge. Discharge procedure : the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting discharge, Parliament may make observations which it considers important and often recommends the Commission and the other institutions to take actions concerning these matters. The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: (i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; (ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and (iii) buildings. The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements. (2) Implementation of the European Parliament’s appropriations for the financial year 2013 : the document comprises a series of detailed annexes, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. As regards the expenditure of the European Parliament, the table on the financial and budgetary management of this institution states that the final appropriations amounted to EUR 1.857 billion, committed to 98.6%. Further information concerning the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget is drawn from the Report on the budgetary and financial management of the European Parliament for 2013 . (3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions : in more general and political terms, the implementation of the Parliament’s budget in 2013 was marked by the continuation of action, begun in 2011, to bring about structural improvements in order to give Parliament all the resources it needs to play its role in the legislative process to the full and enable it to capitalise to the full on the enhanced powers conferred on it by the Treaty of Lisbon. The institution also continued to implement multiannual programmes to rationalise and modernise key sectors of its administration, particularly in the field of security, and undertook significant development of its information and communication policy with a view to the 2014 elections . The document highlighted that the institutional changes arising from Croatia’s accession were completed without any significant difficulties. More technically, the major projects implemented by Parliament in 2013 may be summarised as follows: continuation of institutional changes related to the Lisbon Treaty, including : (i) support for research; (ii) knowledge management; (iii) issues relating to external policy co-decision procedure and consent; (iv) improving plenary sitting services; communications strategy and preparing for the 2014 elections : (i) centrally organised activities in EP and decentralised activities in the Member States; (ii) EYE (European Youth Event to raise awareness of European identity); (iii) the continuation of the House of European History project; (iv) improving services to visitors; further institutional changes arising from the accession of Croatia ; continuing to implement the multiannual programmes to rationalise and modernise key parts of Parliament’s Administration : (i) building/property policy (planning permission granted for the construction of Trebel building in Brussels, continuing work on the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg, negotiations for a new building in Sofia (BG); temporary closure of zone A of the Paul-Henri Spaak in Brussels following the discovery of cracks in three of the ceiling beams in the Chamber roof during inspections in September 2012 as part of the new policy on maintenance and renovation; (ii) environmental policy; (iii) catering policy with a revision of costing of meals in restaurants and canteens; (iv) modernisation of information technologies/security; (iv) relations with national parliaments; (v) further restructuring of the security services; other technical modernisation measures (in particular assistance to Members and archive management).
  • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0082&language=EN title: A8-0082/2015 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gilles PARGNEAUX (S&D, FR) and called on the European Parliament to give discharge to its President in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court for the financial year 2013. Parliament’s budgetary and financial management: Members noted that Parliament's final appropriations for 2013 totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07 % of heading Administration of the Multiannual Financial Framework. In 2013, 99.02 % of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 0.8%. EUR 54 000 000 was transferred from provisional appropriation headings and from other sources so as to help fund the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building (KAD), in Luxembourg. Court of Auditors' opinions on the reliability of the 2013 accounts: the committee commended the fact that the audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament. It reaffirmed that Parliament’s governing bodies and administration were held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it was therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal. Election campaign 2014: Members were deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17 800 000 to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42.54 % (2009: 43 %). They encouraged the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States. They noted that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey showed that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23 % of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general. Members were convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament . Security and Safety: Members took note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety and recalled that the internalisation of Parliament's security services had generated savings of EUR 195 000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016. They considered that the Belgian Government should make a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security , given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory. Greater transparency: the committee welcomed the fact that Members must be more transparent about the on-the-side activities they do while in public office. It was of the opinion that a more detailed declaration template for Members would help to increase transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interests. It also stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members. It regretted that until now the GEA was considered as a lump-sum amount and that there were no precise rules for the expenditures that might be covered by the allowance. Administration and management of the European Parliament: Members made a series of recommendations concerning certain DGs, with particular reference to the following: · Directorate-General for Communication: Members commented on more information on (i) the multiannual grants programme 2012 to 2014, aimed at raising awareness on Parliament's role, and costing some EUR 14 500 000, asking for a full breakdown of all the grants for communication projects funded; (ii) the budget for the EuroparlTV at EUR 5 000 000 in 2014, appreciating that the performance of the service had been improved; (iii) the expenditure on the LUX Prize in 2013 amounted to EUR 448 000 but considering that the Prize was not a core activity of Parliament and questioning its relevance; (iv) Parliament’s new logo and the lack of transparency regarding its use. · Directorate-General Personnel , with Members deeply regretting the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to help Parliamentary Assistants in cases of harassment and irregular layoffs; · Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological support: Members noted (i) the process of the internalisation of staff in the Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support and the promised increased level of expertise among the staff in the IT area; (ii) the problem of personal and confidential individual mail-boxes of selected Members, parliamentary assistants and officials which were compromised after Parliament had been subject to a hacker attack. Lastly, Members made a series of recommendations on Parliament’s policies on contracts and calls for tenders and negotiated procedures and the issue of greening Parliament.
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25517&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0121 title: T8-0121/2015 summary: The European Parliament decided by 545 votes to 148, with 6 abstentions to grant discharge to its President in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Parliament for the financial year 2013. In a resolution adopted by 573 votes to 109, with 11 abstentions, Parliament recalled that Parliament's final appropriations for 2013 totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07% of heading Administration of the Multiannual Financial Framework. In 2013, 99.02% of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 0.8%. EUR 54 000 000 was transferred from provisional appropriation headings and from other sources so as to help fund the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building (KAD), in Luxembourg. Centralised activities of the European Parliament and a single seat : Plenary recalled that according to the Court of Auditors, the potential savings for the Union budget would be about EUR 114 million a year if Parliament centralised its activities . It stressed that Parliament and the Council, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget, must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as stated by Parliament in several previous resolutions. Court of Auditors' opinions on the reliability of the 2013 accounts : Parliament commended the fact that the audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament. It reaffirmed that Parliament’s governing bodies and administration were held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it was therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal. Election campaign 2014 : Parliament is deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17.8 million to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42.54% (2009: 43%). It encouraged the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States. Parliament noted that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey showed that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23% of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general. Parliament was convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament . Staffing : Parliament asked to be provided, by the end of 2015, with year-on-year breakdowns of trends in staffing levels and staff costs, by grade and level of management. It asked Parliament’s administration to state whether comparable studies of the administrations of international parliamentary assemblies could contain important lessons for Parliament’s work. It noted that work outsourced to specialists should also be included in the reports to promote the ethos of transparency, while also serving the best interests of constituents. It noted with concern that the large number of staff based in the office of the President of the European Parliament, which amounts to 35 staff, including two drivers and a personal usher, is highly questionable and that this sets a bad example for cost reduction and fiscal responsibility within Parliament . Security and Safety : Parliament took note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety and recalled that the internalisation of Parliament's security services had generated savings of EUR 195 000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016. It considered that the Belgian Government should make a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security , given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory. Greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members : Parliament welcomed the fact that Members must be more transparent about the on-the-side activities they do while in public office. It insisted that a more detailed declaration template for Members would help to increase transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interests. It also stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members and called on the Bureau to work on the definition of more precise rules regarding the accountability of expenditures authorised under this allowance, without causing additional costs to Parliament. Parliament was also concerned with the lack of ex post verification of the use of service cars by Members and questioned the availability of two service cars for the President of Parliament . Administration and management of the European Parliament : Parliament made a series of recommendations concerning certain DGs, with particular reference to the following: Directorate-General for Communication : Parliament commented on more information on (i) the multiannual grants programme 2012 to 2014, aimed at raising awareness on Parliament's role, and costing some EUR 14 500 000, asking for a full breakdown of all the grants for communication projects funded; (ii) the budget for the EuroparlTV at EUR 5 000 000 in 2014, appreciating that the performance of the service had been improved; (iii) the expenditure on the LUX Prize in 2013 amounted to EUR 448 000. On this issue, Parliament called for a representative survey of Members to be conducted by the end of 2015 to determine whether the LUX Prize is well known and how, if at all, it is viewed in their respective Member State; (iv) Parliament’s new logo and the lack of transparency regarding its use. Directorate-General Personnel , with Parliament deeply regretting the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to help Parliamentary Assistants in cases of harassment and irregular layoffs. It called for the names of the service providers and the services provided to the Member to be made accessible to the public on the homepage of the Members of Parliament, next to the data on the APAs and the local assistants; Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological support : Parliament noted (i) the process of the internalisation of staff in the Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support and the promised increased level of expertise among the staff in the IT area; (ii) the problem of personal and confidential individual mail-boxes of selected Members, parliamentary assistants and officials which were compromised after Parliament had been subject to a hacker attack. Parliament also made a series of recommendations on Parliament’s policies on contracts and calls for tenders and negotiated procedures and the issue of greening Parliament. Lastly, as regards the financing of political parties, plenary did not accept the committee’s position which called for a gradual reduction, up to the eventual abolition, of contributions to European political parties from Parliament’s budget.
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Parliament for the financial year 2013. NON LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2015/1614 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section I — European Parliament. CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to its President for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2013. This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 29 April 2015 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 29 April 2015). Amongst Parliament’s main observations, the latter noted that Parliament's final appropriations totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07% of heading V (Administration) of the Multiannual Financial Framework. Parliament welcomed the fact that the Court of Auditors’ audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament, but it was concerned about maintaining the security of Parliament's buildings and their immediate surroundings. It stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members, and called for more clarity on this issue. Lastly, Members stressed that in order to create long-term savings in the Union budget, Parliament and Council must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat .
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/01250
New
  • CONT/8/01250
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 255 30.09.2015, p. 0001
New
OJ L 255 30.09.2015, p. 0001
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:255:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:255:TOC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.03 2013 discharge
New
8.70.03.03
2013 discharge
procedure/title
Old
2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
New
2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/6
date
2015-09-30T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:255:TOC
title
OJ L 255 30.09.2015, p. 0001
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/5/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25517&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0121
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament decided by 545 votes to 148, with 6 abstentions to grant discharge to its President in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Parliament for the financial year 2013.

    In a resolution adopted by 573 votes to 109, with 11 abstentions, Parliament recalled that Parliament's final appropriations for 2013 totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07% of heading Administration of the Multiannual Financial Framework.  In 2013, 99.02% of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 0.8%. EUR 54 000 000 was transferred from provisional appropriation headings and from other sources so as to help fund the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building (KAD), in Luxembourg.

    Centralised activities of the European Parliament and a single seat: Plenary recalled that according to the Court of Auditors, the potential savings for the Union budget would be about EUR 114 million a year if Parliament centralised its activities. It stressed that Parliament and the Council, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget, must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as stated by Parliament in several previous resolutions.

    Court of Auditors' opinions on the reliability of the 2013 accounts: Parliament commended the fact that the audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament. It reaffirmed that Parliament’s governing bodies and administration were held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it was therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal.

    Election campaign 2014: Parliament is deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17.8 million to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42.54% (2009: 43%). It encouraged the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States.

    Parliament noted that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey showed that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23% of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general. Parliament was convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament.

    Staffing: Parliament asked to be provided, by the end of 2015, with year-on-year breakdowns of trends in staffing levels and staff costs, by grade and level of management. It asked Parliament’s administration to state whether comparable studies of the administrations of international parliamentary assemblies could contain important lessons for Parliament’s work. It noted that work outsourced to specialists should also be included in the reports to promote the ethos of transparency, while also serving the best interests of constituents. It noted with concern that the large number of staff based in the office of the President of the European Parliament, which amounts to 35 staff, including two drivers and a personal usher, is highly questionable and that this sets a bad example for cost reduction and fiscal responsibility within Parliament.

    Security and Safety: Parliament took note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety and recalled that the internalisation of Parliament's security services had generated savings of EUR 195 000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016. It considered that the Belgian Government should make a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security, given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory.

    Greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members: Parliament welcomed the fact that Members must be more transparent about the on-the-side activities they do while in public office. It insisted that a more detailed declaration template for Members would help to increase transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interests. It also stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members and called on the Bureau to work on the definition of more precise rules regarding the accountability of expenditures authorised under this allowance, without causing additional costs to Parliament. Parliament was also concerned with the lack of ex post verification of the use of service cars by Members and questioned the availability of two service cars for the President of Parliament.

    Administration and management of the European Parliament: Parliament made a series of recommendations concerning certain DGs, with particular reference to the following:

    • Directorate-General for Communication: Parliament commented on more information on (i) the multiannual grants programme 2012 to 2014, aimed at raising awareness on Parliament's role, and costing some EUR 14 500 000, asking for a full breakdown of all the grants for communication projects funded; (ii) the budget for the EuroparlTV at EUR 5 000 000 in 2014, appreciating that the performance of the service had been improved; (iii) the expenditure on the LUX Prize in 2013 amounted to EUR 448 000. On this issue, Parliament called for a representative survey of Members to be conducted by the end of 2015 to determine whether the LUX Prize is well known and how, if at all, it is viewed in their respective Member State; (iv) Parliament’s new logo and the lack of transparency regarding its use.
    • Directorate-General Personnel, with Parliament deeply regretting the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to help Parliamentary Assistants in cases of harassment and irregular layoffs. It called for the names of the service providers and the services provided to the Member to be made accessible to the public on the homepage of the Members of Parliament, next to the data on the APAs and the local assistants;
    • Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological support: Parliament noted (i) the process of the internalisation of staff in the Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support and the promised increased level of expertise among the staff in the IT area; (ii) the problem of personal and confidential individual mail-boxes of selected Members, parliamentary assistants and officials which were compromised after Parliament had been subject to a hacker attack.

    Parliament also made a series of recommendations on Parliament’s policies on contracts and calls for tenders and negotiated procedures and the issue of greening Parliament. Lastly, as regards the financing of political parties, plenary did not accept the committee’s position which called for a gradual reduction, up to the eventual abolition, of contributions to European political parties from Parliament’s budget.

activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0121/2015
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
CZARNECKI Ryszard
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/7
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
CZARNECKI Ryszard
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/7
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
committees/4/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/4/shadows/7
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gilles PARGNEAUX (S&D, FR) and called on the European Parliament to give discharge to its President in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court for the financial year 2013.

    Parliament’s budgetary and financial management: Members noted that Parliament's final appropriations for 2013 totalled EUR 1 750 463 939, or 19.07 % of heading Administration of the Multiannual Financial Framework.  In 2013, 99.02 % of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 0.8%. EUR 54 000 000 was transferred from provisional appropriation headings and from other sources so as to help fund the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building (KAD), in Luxembourg.

    Court of Auditors' opinions on the reliability of the 2013 accounts: the committee commended the fact that the audit did not identify any serious weaknesses in respect of the topics audited for Parliament. It reaffirmed that Parliament’s governing bodies and administration were held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it was therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal.

    Election campaign 2014: Members were deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17 800 000 to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42.54 % (2009: 43 %). They encouraged the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States. They noted that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey showed that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23 % of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general. Members were convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament.

    Security and Safety: Members took note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety and recalled that the internalisation of Parliament's security services had generated savings of EUR 195 000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016. They considered that the Belgian Government should make a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security, given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory.

    Greater transparency: the committee welcomed the fact that Members must be more transparent about the on-the-side activities they do while in public office. It was of the opinion that a more detailed declaration template for Members would help to increase transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interests. It also stressed the need for greater transparency as regards the general spending allowances for Members. It regretted that until now the GEA was considered as a lump-sum amount and that there were no precise rules for the expenditures that might be covered by the allowance.

    Administration and management of the European Parliament: Members made a series of recommendations concerning certain DGs, with particular reference to the following:

    ·        Directorate-General for Communication: Members commented on more information on (i) the multiannual grants programme 2012 to 2014, aimed at raising awareness on Parliament's role, and costing some EUR 14 500 000, asking for a full breakdown of all the grants for communication projects funded; (ii) the budget for the EuroparlTV at EUR 5 000 000 in 2014, appreciating that the performance of the service had been improved; (iii) the expenditure on the LUX Prize in 2013 amounted to EUR 448 000 but considering that the Prize was not a core activity of Parliament and questioning its relevance; (iv) Parliament’s new logo and the lack of transparency regarding its use.

    ·        Directorate-General Personnel, with Members deeply regretting the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to help Parliamentary Assistants in cases of harassment and irregular layoffs;

    ·        Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological support: Members noted (i) the process of the internalisation of staff in the Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support and the promised increased level of expertise among the staff in the IT area; (ii) the problem of personal and confidential individual mail-boxes of selected Members, parliamentary assistants and officials which were compromised after Parliament had been subject to a hacker attack.

    Lastly, Members made a series of recommendations on Parliament’s policies on contracts and calls for tenders and negotiated procedures and the issue of greening Parliament.

activities/1/committees/4/shadows/6
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/6
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
committees/4/shadows/6
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/5
date
2015-04-29T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0082&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0082/2015
activities/3
date
2015-03-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIEPER Markus group: ECR name: VISTISEN Anders Primdahl group: ALDE name: GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: NI name: ALIOT Louis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
VISTISEN Anders Primdahl
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
committees/4/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
VISTISEN Anders Primdahl
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner
Old
ŠEMETA Algirdas
New
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
other/0/commissioner
Old
ŠEMETA Algirdas
New
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
JÁVOR Benedek
committees/4/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
JÁVOR Benedek
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
committees/4/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Parliament.

    Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2013 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title IX of this Financial Regulation.

    (1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2013, including the different expenses of the European institutions. It should be recalled that only the Commission budget contains administrative appropriations and operating appropriations. The other Institutions have only administrative appropriations.

    The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

    Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

    • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
    • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies);
    • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
    • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
    • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
    • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
    • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

    Discharge procedure: the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting discharge, Parliament may make observations which it considers important and often recommends the Commission and the other institutions to take actions concerning these matters.

    The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: (i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; (ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and (iii) buildings.

    The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

    (2) Implementation of the European Parliament’s appropriations for the financial year 2013: the document comprises a series of detailed annexes, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. As regards the expenditure of the European Parliament, the table on the financial and budgetary management of this institution states that the final appropriations amounted to EUR 1.857 billion, committed to 98.6%. Further information concerning the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget is drawn from the Report on the budgetary and financial management of the European Parliament for 2013.

    (3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: in more general and political terms, the implementation of the Parliament’s budget in 2013 was marked by the continuation of action, begun in 2011, to bring about structural improvements in order to give Parliament all the resources it needs to play its role in the legislative process to the full and enable it to capitalise to the full on the enhanced powers conferred on it by the Treaty of Lisbon.

    The institution also continued to implement multiannual programmes to rationalise and modernise key sectors of its administration, particularly in the field of security, and undertook significant development of its information and communication policy with a view to the 2014 elections.

    The document highlighted that the institutional changes arising from Croatia’s accession were completed without any significant difficulties.

    More technically, the major projects implemented by Parliament in 2013 may be summarised as follows:

    • continuation of institutional changes related to the Lisbon Treaty, including: (i) support for research; (ii) knowledge management; (iii) issues relating to external policy co-decision procedure and consent; (iv) improving plenary sitting services;
    • communications strategy and preparing for the 2014 elections: (i) centrally organised activities in EP and decentralised activities in the Member States; (ii) EYE (European Youth Event to raise awareness of European identity); (iii) the continuation of the House of European History project; (iv) improving services to visitors;
    • further institutional changes arising from the accession of Croatia;
    • continuing to implement the multiannual programmes to rationalise and modernise key parts of Parliament’s Administration: (i) building/property policy (planning permission granted for the construction of Trebel building in Brussels, continuing work on the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg, negotiations for a new building in Sofia (BG); temporary closure of zone A of the Paul-Henri Spaak in Brussels following the discovery of cracks in three of the ceiling beams in the Chamber roof during inspections in September 2012 as part of the new policy on maintenance and renovation; (ii) environmental policy; (iii) catering policy with a revision of costing of meals in restaurants and canteens; (iv) modernisation of information technologies/security; (iv) relations with national parliaments; (v) further restructuring of the security services;
    • other technical modernisation measures (in particular assistance to Members and archive management).
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
committees/4/shadows/1/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities
  • date: 2014-07-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf celexid: CELEX:52014DC0510:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2014)0510 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIEPER Markus group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: NI name: ALIOT Louis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-03-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIEPER Markus group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: NI name: ALIOT Louis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/01250
reference
2014/2078(DEC)
title
2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
subject
8.70.03.03 2013 discharge