BETA


2014/2079(DEC) 2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Council and Council

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT CZARNECKI Ryszard (icon: ECR ECR) DEUTSCH Tamás (icon: PPE PPE), AYALA SENDER Inés (icon: S&D S&D), THEURER Michael (icon: ALDE ALDE), ŠOLTES Igor (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2015/12/01
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to refuse discharge to the Council for the 2013 financial year.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2015/2214 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section II — European Council and Council.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament refuses to grant the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Council's and the Council's budget for the financial year 2013 .

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 October 2015 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27/10/2015).

In particular, Parliament insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and stressed that the Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermines the right of citizens of the Union. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union.

2015/10/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament decided by 655 votes to 30, with 3 abstentions, to refuse to grant to the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

Democratic accountability : Parliament noted that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions.

The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to the same democratic accountability.

Parliament regretted that the Council had not provided any explanation on the increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments in their 2013 budget.

Parliament stated that the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union.

In this regard, Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions and has responsibility to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union

Pending issues : in order to justify the refusal to grant discharge, Parliament reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date.

It reiterated their call on the Council to:

provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the 'Residence Palace' building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that had been paid thus far and the instalments that remained to be paid; provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget.

It also regretted the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council, pointing out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for similar reasons and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015.

Increased cooperation : Members insisted that an effective budgetary control exercise required cooperation between Parliament and the Council. They reminded the Council of the Commission's views, that all institutions were fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure.

Parliament regretted that the Council continued to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions, and recalled the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information . In this respect, it referred to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulated that each institution, body, office or agency should ensure that its proceedings were transparent.

Once again, Parliament insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and emphasised Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge. It took the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermined the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and was becoming a cause for concern, reflecting a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions.

Updating the rules : Parliament believed that it was necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU. It considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure could be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.

Documents
2015/10/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/10/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/09/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the 2nd report by Ryszard CZARNECKI (ECR, PL) and called on the European Parliament to refuse to grant to the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

Members noted that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability.

Members regretted that the Council had not provided any explanation on the increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments in their 2013 budget.

Pending issues : in order to justify the refusal to grant discharge, Members reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date.

They reiterated their call on the Council to:

provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the 'Residence Palace' building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that had been paid thus far and the instalments that remained to be paid; provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget.

Members also regretted the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council, pointing out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for similar reasons and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015.

Increased cooperation : Members insisted that an effective budgetary control exercise required cooperation between Parliament and the Council. They reminded the Council of the Commission's views, that all institutions were fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure.

The committee regretted that the Council continued to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions, and recalled the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information . In this respect, it referred to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulated that each institution, body, office or agency should ensure that its proceedings were transparent.

Once again, Members insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and emphasised Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge. They took the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermined the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and was becoming a cause for concern, reflecting a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions.

Updating the rules : the committee believed that it was necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU. They considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure could be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.

Documents
2015/09/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/09/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/06/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/05/22
   EP - CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2015/04/29
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/04/29
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament decided by 669 votes to 13, with 5 abstentions, to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013 .

In a parallel resolution, Parliament recalled by 642 votes to 40, with 7 abstentions that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions.

On the reasons for postponing the discharge, Parliament stressed that the Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do . It regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. It took note, nonetheless, of the interest shown by the current Presidency of the Union in reconciling positions, regarding actively tangible measures to reach a ʽmodus vivendiʼ to improve the capacity for dialogue between the two institutions.

Greater cooperation : Parliament reiterated that it was only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise of formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members. Without the cooperation of the Council, Parliament was not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge . In this regard, Parliament agreed with the Commission's views in its letter of 23 January 2014 to Parliament that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now. It endorsed the view that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the relevant secondary law. It regretted that Parliament repeatedly encountered problems in receiving answers from the Council .

Recalling the relevant Treaty provisions on discharge, Parliament stated that granting or not granting discharge was a duty Parliament had towards the Union citizens and considered that the discharge-related legal framework of the Union should be revised in order to clarify the discharge making process.

In general, Parliament felt that the Council could do more on matters related to transparency.

Internal management of the Council and the European Council : Parliament noted that in 2013, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 535 511 300 with an implementation of 86.7%. It took note that EUR 71 376 244 of commitments were cancelled in 2013 due to underspending and a reduction in the use of facilities. Parliament was surprised to learn that EUR 5 million committed for the acquisition of the 'Europa' building was carried over to 2014 for actual payment. This balance, in addition to other appropriations carried over, went against the principles of annuality and sound financial management of the Financial Regulation.

As regards building policy , Parliament took note that some of the audit recommendations on the 'Europa' building project are still lagging behind execution. It reiterated its call for the Council to provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the building.

A separate budget for the two institutions : Parliament reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. It called on the European Council and the Council to send Parliament their annual activity report with a comprehensive overview of all human resources available to both institutions, broken down by category, grade, sex, nationality and vocational training.

Parliament went on to make a series of observations on the costs of translation in Council (which shows some disparity with other institutions) and asked for a unified methodology of presenting translation costs and better practice on translation issues.

Lastly, it considered that at a time of crisis and budgetary cuts in general, the cost of ʽaway daysʼ for staff at the Union institutions had to be reduced and that these should take place, where possible, on the institutions’ own premises as the added value derived from these away days did not justify such high costs.

Documents
2015/04/29
   EP - Report referred back to committee
2015/04/28
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/03/31
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Ryszard CZARNECKI (ECR, PL) and called on Parliament to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

It recalled that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. On the reasons for postponing the discharge, Members stressed that the Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do . They regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. They took note, nonetheless, of the interest shown by the current Presidency of the Union in reconciling positions, regarding actively tangible measures to reach a ʽmodus vivendiʼ to improve the capacity for dialogue between the two institutions.

Greater cooperation: Members reiterated that it was only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise of formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members. Without the cooperation of the Council, Parliament was not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge . Members agreed with the Commission's views in its letter of 23 January 2014 to Parliament that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now. They endorsed the view that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the relevant secondary law. They regretted that Parliament repeatedly encountered problems in receiving answers from the Council.

Recalling the relevant Treaty provisions on discharge, Members stated that granting or not granting discharge was a duty Parliament had towards the Union citizens and considered that the discharge-related legal framework of the Union should be revised in order to clarify the discharge making process.

In general, Members felt that the Council could do more on matters related to transparency.

On the Council’s general management, the committee noted that in 2013, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 535 511 300 with an implementation of 86.7 %. It took note that EUR 71 376 244 of commitments were cancelled in 2013 due to underspending and a reduction in the use of facilities.

Members were surprised to learn that EUR 5 million committed for the acquisition of the 'Europa' building was carried over to 2014 for actual payment. This balance, in addition to other appropriations carried over, went against the principles of annuality and sound financial management of the Financial Regulation.

Members reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. They called on the European Council and the Council to send Parliament their annual activity report with a comprehensive overview of all human resources available to both institutions, broken down by category, grade, sex, nationality and vocational training.

The committee went on to make a series of observations on the costs of translation in Council (which shows some disparity with other institutions) and asked for a unified methodology of presenting translation costs and better practice on translation issues.

Lastly, it considered that at a time of crisis and budgetary cuts in general, the cost of ʽaway daysʼ for staff at the Union institutions had to be reduced and that these should take place, where possible, on the institutions’ own premises as the added value derived from these away days did not justify such high costs.

Documents
2015/03/23
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/03/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/02/02
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/01/30
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Details

On the basis of the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the European Union institutions in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013 .

The Council welcomes the fact that, as in previous years, the administrative and related expenditure of the institutions and bodies of the European Union remained free from material error and that their examined control systems were assessed as effective .

However, the Council points out that, according to the Court, the estimated error rate of this policy group increased from 0% to 1% . The Council takes note that 10% of the audited sample of transactions were affected by error.

The Council welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses identified by the Court.

Documents
2014/10/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/07/30
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council/Council .

Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2013 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title IX of this Financial Regulation.

(1) Purpose : the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2013 , including the different expenses of the European institutions. It should be recalled that only the Commission budget contains administrative appropriations and operating appropriations. The other Institutions have only administrative appropriations.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

Discharge procedure : the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting discharge, Parliament may make observations which it considers important and often recommends the Commission and the other institutions to take actions concerning these matters.

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: (i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; (ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and (iii) buildings.

The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

(2) Implementation of the European Council/Council’s appropriations for the financial year 2013 : the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget.

Budget 2013 : at the end of 2013, an amount of EUR 507 million was committed.

Budget implementation : information concerning the implementation of the budget of the Council and the European Council is drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2013 (Section II - European Council and Council).

The budget authority established the overall European Council/Council budget 2013 at EUR 535.5 million . This corresponds to an increase of EUR 1.6 million (0.3%) compared to the 2012. The number of posts in the establishment plan for 2013 for the EC/C was 3153.

The global implementation rate of the 2013 budget is 86.7%. The difference between the final budget and implementation can be explained as follows:

the total under-spending in the category of establishment plan amounts to EUR 23.6 million; the global implementation of the building related expenditure (without the Europa-Building) resulted in a saving of EUR 2.4 million; in the IT domain the budget implementation was almost 98 %. The under-spending of EUR 800 000 resulted from a smaller need for IT equipment, software and outside consultancy; the underspending in appropriations for interpretation amounts to EUR 11.2 million and EUR 2.5 million in organising meetings and conferences.

The document also notes the underspending in furniture, technical equipment and transport costs. The amount available for delegations' travel expenses after transfers amounted to EUR 25.3 million.

(3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions : in more general and political terms, the implementation of the Council budget in 2013 was marked by the following:

the continuous support to the President of the European Council and to the Council through an appropriate use of financial resources; the need to proceed further with the process of administrative modernisation with the objective to reinforce the quality of its organisation as well as the appropriate use of resources; the adaptation of its organisation to the accession of Croatia in July 2013.

Building policy : the project to renovate the Residence Palace and convert it into the seat of the European Council and the Council (Europa Building) continued in 2013 with the actual construction work including, among other things, starting to building up floors, insulation and various technical installations.

In 2013, EUR 5 million was committed for the acquisition of the Europa Building. The amount has been carried over to 2014 for the actual payment.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0116/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Décision (ensemble du texte) #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 669, -: 13, 0: 5
DE IT FR ES PL GB RO NL BE PT CZ EL HU BG SE FI SK HR DK IE AT SI LT LV LU EE CY MT
Total
90
70
70
50
46
54
31
26
20
20
21
19
17
14
16
12
12
11
11
10
18
8
9
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
206
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
62

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
46

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

A8-0116/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Résolution #

2015/04/29 Outcome: +: 642, -: 40, 0: 7
DE IT ES PL GB RO FR BE PT CZ HU AT EL BG NL SE FI SK HR DK IE LT SI LV LU EE CY MT
Total
90
70
50
47
54
30
70
20
20
21
19
18
17
14
26
17
12
13
11
11
10
9
8
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
208
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
63

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Poland NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

4

A8-0269/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Résolution #

2015/10/27 Outcome: +: 655, -: 30, 0: 3
DE IT FR PL ES RO GB PT BE HU AT EL NL CZ BG SE FI DK SK IE LT LV HR SI EE MT LU CY ??
Total
90
69
64
49
44
29
71
21
20
19
18
18
24
18
14
18
12
12
13
10
8
8
8
8
6
6
5
5
1
icon: PPE PPE
200

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37
2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
16 2014/2079(DEC)
2015/03/05 CONT 15 amendments...
source: 539.833
2015/09/04 CONT 1 amendments...
source: 565.188

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
KARI Rina Ronja
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.739
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-539739_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.833
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-539833_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.695
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-560695_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.188
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-565188_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2015-03-31T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0116_EN.html title: A8-0116/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-03-31T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0116_EN.html title: A8-0116/2015
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-04-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0122_EN.html title: T8-0122/2015
summary
events/6
date
2015-04-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0122_EN.html title: T8-0122/2015
summary
events/8/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/9
date
2015-09-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0269_EN.html title: A8-0269/2015
summary
events/9
date
2015-09-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0269_EN.html title: A8-0269/2015
summary
events/10/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151026&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/11
date
2015-10-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0373_EN.html title: T8-0373/2015
summary
events/11
date
2015-10-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0373_EN.html title: T8-0373/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: CZARNECKI Ryszard date: 2015-05-22T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
date
2015-05-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0116&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0116_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0122
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0122_EN.html
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0269&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0269_EN.html
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0373
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0373_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2014-07-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510 title: COM(2014)0510 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0510:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-05-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-03-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-05-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-03-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0116&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0116/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25552&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0122 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0122/2015 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-05-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-09-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0269&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0269/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-10-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151026&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0373 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0373/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2015-12-01T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
date
2015-05-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2015-05-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2014-09-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/20
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2015-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5303%2F15&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05303/2015 summary: On the basis of the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the European Union institutions in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013 . The Council welcomes the fact that, as in previous years, the administrative and related expenditure of the institutions and bodies of the European Union remained free from material error and that their examined control systems were assessed as effective . However, the Council points out that, according to the Court, the estimated error rate of this policy group increased from 0% to 1% . The Council takes note that 10% of the audited sample of transactions were affected by error. The Council welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses identified by the Court. type: Document attached to the procedure body: CSL
  • date: 2015-02-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.739 title: PE539.739 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.833 title: PE539.833 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.695 title: PE560.695 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.188 title: PE565.188 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2014-07-30T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0510 summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council/Council . Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2013 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title IX of this Financial Regulation. (1) Purpose : the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2013 , including the different expenses of the European institutions. It should be recalled that only the Commission budget contains administrative appropriations and operating appropriations. The other Institutions have only administrative appropriations. The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management. Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues: accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge. Discharge procedure : the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting discharge, Parliament may make observations which it considers important and often recommends the Commission and the other institutions to take actions concerning these matters. The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: (i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; (ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and (iii) buildings. The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements. (2) Implementation of the European Council/Council’s appropriations for the financial year 2013 : the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Budget 2013 : at the end of 2013, an amount of EUR 507 million was committed. Budget implementation : information concerning the implementation of the budget of the Council and the European Council is drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2013 (Section II - European Council and Council). The budget authority established the overall European Council/Council budget 2013 at EUR 535.5 million . This corresponds to an increase of EUR 1.6 million (0.3%) compared to the 2012. The number of posts in the establishment plan for 2013 for the EC/C was 3153. The global implementation rate of the 2013 budget is 86.7%. The difference between the final budget and implementation can be explained as follows: the total under-spending in the category of establishment plan amounts to EUR 23.6 million; the global implementation of the building related expenditure (without the Europa-Building) resulted in a saving of EUR 2.4 million; in the IT domain the budget implementation was almost 98 %. The under-spending of EUR 800 000 resulted from a smaller need for IT equipment, software and outside consultancy; the underspending in appropriations for interpretation amounts to EUR 11.2 million and EUR 2.5 million in organising meetings and conferences. The document also notes the underspending in furniture, technical equipment and transport costs. The amount available for delegations' travel expenses after transfers amounted to EUR 25.3 million. (3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions : in more general and political terms, the implementation of the Council budget in 2013 was marked by the following: the continuous support to the President of the European Council and to the Council through an appropriate use of financial resources; the need to proceed further with the process of administrative modernisation with the objective to reinforce the quality of its organisation as well as the appropriate use of resources; the adaptation of its organisation to the accession of Croatia in July 2013. Building policy : the project to renovate the Residence Palace and convert it into the seat of the European Council and the Council (Europa Building) continued in 2013 with the actual construction work including, among other things, starting to building up floors, insulation and various technical installations. In 2013, EUR 5 million was committed for the acquisition of the Europa Building. The amount has been carried over to 2014 for the actual payment.
  • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-31T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0116&language=EN title: A8-0116/2015 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Ryszard CZARNECKI (ECR, PL) and called on Parliament to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013. It recalled that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. On the reasons for postponing the discharge, Members stressed that the Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do . They regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. They took note, nonetheless, of the interest shown by the current Presidency of the Union in reconciling positions, regarding actively tangible measures to reach a ʽmodus vivendiʼ to improve the capacity for dialogue between the two institutions. Greater cooperation: Members reiterated that it was only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise of formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members. Without the cooperation of the Council, Parliament was not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge . Members agreed with the Commission's views in its letter of 23 January 2014 to Parliament that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now. They endorsed the view that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the relevant secondary law. They regretted that Parliament repeatedly encountered problems in receiving answers from the Council. Recalling the relevant Treaty provisions on discharge, Members stated that granting or not granting discharge was a duty Parliament had towards the Union citizens and considered that the discharge-related legal framework of the Union should be revised in order to clarify the discharge making process. In general, Members felt that the Council could do more on matters related to transparency. On the Council’s general management, the committee noted that in 2013, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 535 511 300 with an implementation of 86.7 %. It took note that EUR 71 376 244 of commitments were cancelled in 2013 due to underspending and a reduction in the use of facilities. Members were surprised to learn that EUR 5 million committed for the acquisition of the 'Europa' building was carried over to 2014 for actual payment. This balance, in addition to other appropriations carried over, went against the principles of annuality and sound financial management of the Financial Regulation. Members reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. They called on the European Council and the Council to send Parliament their annual activity report with a comprehensive overview of all human resources available to both institutions, broken down by category, grade, sex, nationality and vocational training. The committee went on to make a series of observations on the costs of translation in Council (which shows some disparity with other institutions) and asked for a unified methodology of presenting translation costs and better practice on translation issues. Lastly, it considered that at a time of crisis and budgetary cuts in general, the cost of ʽaway daysʼ for staff at the Union institutions had to be reduced and that these should take place, where possible, on the institutions’ own premises as the added value derived from these away days did not justify such high costs.
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25552&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0122 title: T8-0122/2015 summary: The European Parliament decided by 669 votes to 13, with 5 abstentions, to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013 . In a parallel resolution, Parliament recalled by 642 votes to 40, with 7 abstentions that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. On the reasons for postponing the discharge, Parliament stressed that the Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do . It regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. It took note, nonetheless, of the interest shown by the current Presidency of the Union in reconciling positions, regarding actively tangible measures to reach a ʽmodus vivendiʼ to improve the capacity for dialogue between the two institutions. Greater cooperation : Parliament reiterated that it was only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise of formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members. Without the cooperation of the Council, Parliament was not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge . In this regard, Parliament agreed with the Commission's views in its letter of 23 January 2014 to Parliament that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now. It endorsed the view that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the relevant secondary law. It regretted that Parliament repeatedly encountered problems in receiving answers from the Council . Recalling the relevant Treaty provisions on discharge, Parliament stated that granting or not granting discharge was a duty Parliament had towards the Union citizens and considered that the discharge-related legal framework of the Union should be revised in order to clarify the discharge making process. In general, Parliament felt that the Council could do more on matters related to transparency. Internal management of the Council and the European Council : Parliament noted that in 2013, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 535 511 300 with an implementation of 86.7%. It took note that EUR 71 376 244 of commitments were cancelled in 2013 due to underspending and a reduction in the use of facilities. Parliament was surprised to learn that EUR 5 million committed for the acquisition of the 'Europa' building was carried over to 2014 for actual payment. This balance, in addition to other appropriations carried over, went against the principles of annuality and sound financial management of the Financial Regulation. As regards building policy , Parliament took note that some of the audit recommendations on the 'Europa' building project are still lagging behind execution. It reiterated its call for the Council to provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the building. A separate budget for the two institutions : Parliament reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. It called on the European Council and the Council to send Parliament their annual activity report with a comprehensive overview of all human resources available to both institutions, broken down by category, grade, sex, nationality and vocational training. Parliament went on to make a series of observations on the costs of translation in Council (which shows some disparity with other institutions) and asked for a unified methodology of presenting translation costs and better practice on translation issues. Lastly, it considered that at a time of crisis and budgetary cuts in general, the cost of ʽaway daysʼ for staff at the Union institutions had to be reduced and that these should take place, where possible, on the institutions’ own premises as the added value derived from these away days did not justify such high costs.
  • date: 2015-04-29T00:00:00 type: Report referred back to committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0269&language=EN title: A8-0269/2015 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the 2nd report by Ryszard CZARNECKI (ECR, PL) and called on the European Parliament to refuse to grant to the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013. Members noted that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability. Members regretted that the Council had not provided any explanation on the increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments in their 2013 budget. Pending issues : in order to justify the refusal to grant discharge, Members reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date. They reiterated their call on the Council to: provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the 'Residence Palace' building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that had been paid thus far and the instalments that remained to be paid; provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget. Members also regretted the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council, pointing out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for similar reasons and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015. Increased cooperation : Members insisted that an effective budgetary control exercise required cooperation between Parliament and the Council. They reminded the Council of the Commission's views, that all institutions were fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure. The committee regretted that the Council continued to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions, and recalled the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information . In this respect, it referred to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulated that each institution, body, office or agency should ensure that its proceedings were transparent. Once again, Members insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and emphasised Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge. They took the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermined the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and was becoming a cause for concern, reflecting a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions. Updating the rules : the committee believed that it was necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU. They considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure could be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.
  • date: 2015-10-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151026&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-10-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0373 title: T8-0373/2015 summary: The European Parliament decided by 655 votes to 30, with 3 abstentions, to refuse to grant to the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013. Democratic accountability : Parliament noted that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to the same democratic accountability. Parliament regretted that the Council had not provided any explanation on the increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments in their 2013 budget. Parliament stated that the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union. In this regard, Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions and has responsibility to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union Pending issues : in order to justify the refusal to grant discharge, Parliament reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date. It reiterated their call on the Council to: provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the 'Residence Palace' building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that had been paid thus far and the instalments that remained to be paid; provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget. It also regretted the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council, pointing out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for similar reasons and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015. Increased cooperation : Members insisted that an effective budgetary control exercise required cooperation between Parliament and the Council. They reminded the Council of the Commission's views, that all institutions were fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure. Parliament regretted that the Council continued to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions, and recalled the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information . In this respect, it referred to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulated that each institution, body, office or agency should ensure that its proceedings were transparent. Once again, Parliament insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and emphasised Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge. It took the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermined the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and was becoming a cause for concern, reflecting a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions. Updating the rules : Parliament believed that it was necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU. It considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure could be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.
  • date: 2015-10-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2015-12-01T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to refuse discharge to the Council for the 2013 financial year. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2015/2214 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section II — European Council and Council. CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament refuses to grant the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Council's and the Council's budget for the financial year 2013 . This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 October 2015 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27/10/2015). In particular, Parliament insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and stressed that the Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermines the right of citizens of the Union. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union.
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/01312;CONT/8/03530
New
  • CONT/8/03530
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 314 01.12.2015, p. 0048
New
OJ L 314 01.12.2015, p. 0048
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:314:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:314:TOC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.03 2013 discharge
New
8.70.03.03
2013 discharge
procedure/title
Old
2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Council and Council
New
2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Council and Council
activities/10
date
2015-12-01T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:314:TOC
title
OJ L 314 01.12.2015, p. 0048
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/9/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament decided by 655 votes to 30, with 3 abstentions, to refuse to grant to the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

    Democratic accountability: Parliament noted that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions.

    The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to the same democratic accountability.

    Parliament regretted that the Council had not provided any explanation on the increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments in their 2013 budget.

    Parliament stated that the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union.

    In this regard, Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions and has responsibility to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union

    Pending issues: in order to justify the refusal to grant discharge, Parliament reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date.

    It reiterated their call on the Council to:

    • provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the 'Residence Palace' building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that had been paid thus far and the instalments that remained to be paid;
    • provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget.

    It also regretted the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council, pointing out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for similar reasons and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015.

    Increased cooperation: Members insisted that an effective budgetary control exercise required cooperation between Parliament and the Council.  They reminded the Council of the Commission's views, that all institutions were fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure.

    Parliament regretted that the Council continued to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions, and recalled the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information. In this respect, it referred to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulated that each institution, body, office or agency should ensure that its proceedings were transparent.

    Once again, Parliament insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and emphasised Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge. It took the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermined the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and was becoming a cause for concern, reflecting a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions.

    Updating the rules: Parliament believed that it was necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU. It considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure could be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.

activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
activities/8/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151026&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/9/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0373 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0373/2015
activities/9/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/8/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0510
activities/7/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the 2nd report by Ryszard CZARNECKI (ECR, PL) and called on the European Parliament to refuse to grant to the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

    Members noted that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability.

    Members regretted that the Council had not provided any explanation on the increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments in their 2013 budget.

    Pending issues: in order to justify the refusal to grant discharge, Members reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date.

    They reiterated their call on the Council to:

    • provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the 'Residence Palace' building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that had been paid thus far and the instalments that remained to be paid;
    • provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget.

    Members also regretted the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council, pointing out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for similar reasons and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015.

    Increased cooperation: Members insisted that an effective budgetary control exercise required cooperation between Parliament and the Council.  They reminded the Council of the Commission's views, that all institutions were fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure.

    The committee regretted that the Council continued to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions, and recalled the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information. In this respect, it referred to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulated that each institution, body, office or agency should ensure that its proceedings were transparent.

    Once again, Members insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and emphasised Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge. They took the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermined the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and was becoming a cause for concern, reflecting a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions.

    Updating the rules: the committee believed that it was necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU. They considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure could be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.

activities/6
date
2015-09-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/7
date
2015-09-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0269&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0269/2015
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/8
date
2015-10-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/9
date
2015-10-27T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/5/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25552&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/1/committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja
  • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
activities/2/committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja
  • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja
  • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0510:EN
activities/1/committees/4/date
2015-05-22T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard
activities/2/committees/4/date
2015-05-22T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/4/date
2015-05-22T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard
activities/1/committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
activities/1/committees/5/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja
  • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
activities/2/committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
activities/2/committees/5/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja
  • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/5/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja
  • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/01312
New
CONT/8/01312;CONT/8/03530
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0122
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament decided by 669 votes to 13, with 5 abstentions, to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

    In a parallel resolution, Parliament recalled by 642 votes to 40, with 7 abstentions that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions.

    On the reasons for postponing the discharge, Parliament stressed that the Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do. It regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. It took note, nonetheless, of the interest shown by the current Presidency of the Union in reconciling positions, regarding actively tangible measures to reach a ʽmodus vivendiʼ to improve the capacity for dialogue between the two institutions.

    Greater cooperation: Parliament reiterated that it was only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise of formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members.  Without the cooperation of the Council, Parliament was not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge. In this regard, Parliament agreed with the Commission's views in its letter of 23 January 2014 to Parliament that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now. It endorsed the view that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the relevant secondary law. It regretted that Parliament repeatedly encountered problems in receiving answers from the Council.

    Recalling the relevant Treaty provisions on discharge, Parliament stated that granting or not granting discharge was a duty Parliament had towards the Union citizens and considered that the discharge-related legal framework of the Union should be revised in order to clarify the discharge making process.

    In general, Parliament felt that the Council could do more on matters related to transparency.

    Internal management of the Council and the European Council: Parliament noted that in 2013, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 535 511 300 with an implementation of 86.7%. It took note that EUR 71 376 244 of commitments were cancelled in 2013 due to underspending and a reduction in the use of facilities. Parliament was surprised to learn that EUR 5 million committed for the acquisition of the 'Europa' building was carried over to 2014 for actual payment. This balance, in addition to other appropriations carried over, went against the principles of annuality and sound financial management of the Financial Regulation.

    As regards building policy, Parliament took note that some of the audit recommendations on the 'Europa' building project are still lagging behind execution. It reiterated its call for the Council to provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the building.

    A separate budget for the two institutions: Parliament reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. It called on the European Council and the Council to send Parliament their annual activity report with a comprehensive overview of all human resources available to both institutions, broken down by category, grade, sex, nationality and vocational training.

    Parliament went on to make a series of observations on the costs of translation in Council (which shows some disparity with other institutions) and asked for a unified methodology of presenting translation costs and better practice on translation issues.

    Lastly, it considered that at a time of crisis and budgetary cuts in general, the cost of ʽaway daysʼ for staff at the Union institutions had to be reduced and that these should take place, where possible, on the institutions’ own premises as the added value derived from these away days did not justify such high costs.

activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150428&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0122/2015
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/6
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/6
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
committees/4/shadows/6
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Ryszard CZARNECKI (ECR, PL) and called on Parliament to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2013.

    It recalled that all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. On the reasons for postponing the discharge, Members stressed that the Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do.  They regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. They took note, nonetheless, of the interest shown by the current Presidency of the Union in reconciling positions, regarding actively tangible measures to reach a ʽmodus vivendiʼ to improve the capacity for dialogue between the two institutions.

    Greater cooperation: Members reiterated that it was only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise of formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members.  Without the cooperation of the Council, Parliament was not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge. Members agreed with the Commission's views in its letter of 23 January 2014 to Parliament that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now. They endorsed the view that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the relevant secondary law. They regretted that Parliament repeatedly encountered problems in receiving answers from the Council.

    Recalling the relevant Treaty provisions on discharge, Members stated that granting or not granting discharge was a duty Parliament had towards the Union citizens and considered that the discharge-related legal framework of the Union should be revised in order to clarify the discharge making process.

    In general, Members felt that the Council could do more on matters related to transparency.

    On the Council’s general management, the committee noted that in 2013, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 535 511 300 with an implementation of 86.7 %. It took note that EUR 71 376 244 of commitments were cancelled in 2013 due to underspending and a reduction in the use of facilities.

    Members were surprised to learn that EUR 5 million committed for the acquisition of the 'Europa' building was carried over to 2014 for actual payment. This balance, in addition to other appropriations carried over, went against the principles of annuality and sound financial management of the Financial Regulation.

    Members reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. They called on the European Council and the Council to send Parliament their annual activity report with a comprehensive overview of all human resources available to both institutions, broken down by category, grade, sex, nationality and vocational training.

    The committee went on to make a series of observations on the costs of translation in Council (which shows some disparity with other institutions) and asked for a unified methodology of presenting translation costs and better practice on translation issues.

    Lastly, it considered that at a time of crisis and budgetary cuts in general, the cost of ʽaway daysʼ for staff at the Union institutions had to be reduced and that these should take place, where possible, on the institutions’ own premises as the added value derived from these away days did not justify such high costs.

activities/5
date
2015-04-29T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0116&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0116/2015
activities/3
date
2015-03-31T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2015-03-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner
Old
ŠEMETA Algirdas
New
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
other/0/commissioner
Old
ŠEMETA Algirdas
New
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
AYALA SENDER Inés
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
THEURER Michael
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
ŠOLTES Igor
committees/4/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
AYALA SENDER Inés
committees/4/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
THEURER Michael
committees/4/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
ŠOLTES Igor
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council/Council.

    Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2013 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title IX of this Financial Regulation.

    (1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2013, including the different expenses of the European institutions. It should be recalled that only the Commission budget contains administrative appropriations and operating appropriations. The other Institutions have only administrative appropriations.

    The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

    Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

    • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
    • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies);
    • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
    • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
    • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
    • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
    • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

    Discharge procedure: the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting discharge, Parliament may make observations which it considers important and often recommends the Commission and the other institutions to take actions concerning these matters.

    The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: (i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; (ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and (iii) buildings.

    The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

    (2) Implementation of the European Council/Council’s appropriations for the financial year 2013: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget.

    Budget 2013: at the end of 2013, an amount of EUR 507 million was committed.

    Budget implementation: information concerning the implementation of the budget of the Council and the European Council is drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2013 (Section II - European Council and Council).

    The budget authority established the overall European Council/Council budget 2013 at EUR 535.5 million. This corresponds to an increase of EUR 1.6 million (0.3%) compared to the 2012. The number of posts in the establishment plan for 2013 for the EC/C was 3153.

    The global implementation rate of the 2013 budget is 86.7%. The difference between the final budget and implementation can be explained as follows:

    • the total under-spending in the category of establishment plan amounts to EUR 23.6 million;
    • the global implementation of the building related expenditure (without the Europa-Building) resulted in a saving of EUR 2.4 million;
    • in the IT domain the budget implementation was almost 98 %. The under-spending of EUR 800 000 resulted from a smaller need for IT equipment, software and outside consultancy;
    • the underspending in appropriations for interpretation amounts to EUR 11.2 million and EUR 2.5 million in organising meetings and conferences.

    The document also notes the underspending in furniture, technical equipment and transport costs. The amount available for delegations' travel expenses after transfers amounted to EUR 25.3 million.

    (3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: in more general and political terms,  the implementation of the Council budget in 2013 was marked by the following:

    • the continuous support to the President of the European Council and to the Council through an appropriate use of financial resources;
    • the need to proceed further with the process of administrative modernisation with the objective to reinforce the quality of its organisation as well as the appropriate use of resources;
    • the adaptation of its organisation to the accession of Croatia in July 2013.

    Building policy: the project to renovate the Residence Palace and convert it into the seat of the European Council and the Council (Europa Building) continued in 2013 with the actual construction work including, among other things, starting to building up floors, insulation and various technical installations.

    In 2013, EUR 5 million was committed for the acquisition of the Europa Building. The amount has been carried over to 2014 for the actual payment.

activities/1/committees/9/date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/9/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: LA VIA Giovanni
committees/9/date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
committees/9/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: LA VIA Giovanni
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2
group
EFD
name
VALLI Marco
committees/4/shadows/2
group
EFD
name
VALLI Marco
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
committees/4/shadows/2
group
NI
name
ALIOT Louis
activities
  • date: 2014-07-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0510/COM_COM(2014)0510_FR.pdf title: COM(2014)0510 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0510:EN body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • date: 2014-10-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: LA VIA Giovanni body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: GUE/NGL name: KARI Rina Ronja responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2014-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: LA VIA Giovanni
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/01312
reference
2014/2079(DEC)
title
2013 discharge: EU general budget, European Council and Council
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
subject
8.70.03.03 2013 discharge