Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2015/04/28
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR) | ALIOT Louis (NI), LIBERADZKI Bogusław (S&D), DE JONG Dennis (GUE/NGL), VALLI Marco (EFD) |
Opinion | ITRE |
Activites
-
2015/04/28
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
- 2015/03/31 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
2015/03/23
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2014/10/20
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2014/07/30
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2014)0510
summary
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking. CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the ENIAC Joint Undertaking. The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based. Discharge procedure of the EU Joint Undertakings: the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective. The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies and Joint Undertakings (JUs) do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy. Each JU is subject to its own discharge procedure. ENIAC: in 2013, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows: description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking: the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, located in Brussels, was set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 72/2008 for a period of 10 years. The aim of ENIAC is to define a commonly agreed research agenda in the field of nano-electronics. It pursues this by pooling resources from the public and private sectors to support R&D activities in the form of projects; accounts of the JU: the total commitment of the EU amounts to EUR 450 million. At 31 December 2013, the Commission held 95.41% of the ownership participation in ENIAC. The cumulative unrecognised share of losses is EUR 26 million. Please also consult the final accounts of ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, GEORGIEVA Kristalina
-
COM(2014)0510
summary
Documents
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0104/2015
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2014)0510
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2014/2135(DEC)
2015/03/05
CONT
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Is concerned that there is poor information regarding the evaluation of the MS and AENEAS contributions corresponding to the actual level of Union's payments; in line with the information received, the contribution of the MS is under the level of 1.8 as requested by the Joint Undertaking’s statute; calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit a report to the discharge authority concerning the contributions of all members other than the Commission , including the application of the evaluation rules, together with an assessment by the Commission;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit a report to the discharge authority on the social-economic benefits of the already completed projects; calls for that report to be submitted to the discharge authority together with an assessment by the Commission;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Notes the Joint Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission and the subsequent political agreement reached on the separate discharge for Joint Undertakings under Article 209 of the Financial Regulation
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13 b. Reiterates its demand to the Court of Auditors to present a complete and appropriate financial assessment of rights and obligations of the Joint Undertaking for the period up to the date of ECSEL Joint Undertaking starting activity.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. calls on the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority the progress of the database concerning conflicts of interest.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Recalls that the discharge authority has previously requested that the Court draws up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2013;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 10.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Is deeply concerned that the Court issued a qualified opinion, for a third consecutive year, on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts, on the grounds of not being able to conclude whether or not the ex post audit strategy, which relies heavily on the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) auditing project cost claims, provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges from the Joint
source: 549.355
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2015-03-23T00:00:00New
2014-07-30T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/2/date |
Old
2015-03-24T00:00:00New
2015-03-23T00:00:00 |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|