Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli (ALDE) | |
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | REGI |
Activites
- 2014/11/25 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- 2014/11/21 Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
-
2014/11/20
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2014/11/12
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2014/10/24
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2014)0662
summary
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist France following redundancies in its food manufacturing sector. PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 provides that the EGF shall not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million (2011 prices). The rules applicable to financial contributions from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 (the 'EGF Regulation'). The Commission examined the application for mobilisation of the EGF to assist France and concluded the following: France:EGF/2014/005 FR/GAD: the French authorities submitted application EGF/2014/005 FR/GAD for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in GAD société anonyme simplifiée in France. The authorities submitted the application within the 12 week delay as set out in the EGF Regulation, which expires on 24 October 2014. In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, France argues that the global financial and economic crisis led to reduced pigmeat consumption in Europe, which in turn caused a decline in the production of pigmeat and throughput of abattoirs such as GAD. While pigmeat consumption in 2007 was still 43 kg per annum per head of population, it had dropped to 39 kg per annum in 2013. This decline in consumption, caused by the global financial and economic crisis, affected other types of meat as well, but hit pork particularly hard, as its price had been increasing faster than that of other meats, particularly beef. At a time when the EU was still suffering from the effects of the crisis, consumers were unwilling or unable to buy the same amounts of pork which they had previously bought. GAD, as an abattoir and meat processing enterprise, was caught in the vice between the two sets of price pressures that of the farmers struggling to cope with the increased price of feed, and that of the consumers struggling to cope with reduced income. As this pressure lasted for five years and more, the enterprise ended up in serious financial difficulties and it became loss-making in 2009. Finally, the company was placed into receivership, having made losses of EUR 65 million during the period 2010 to June 2013. To date, the 'Manufacture of food products' sector has been the subject of one other EGF application, also based on the global financial and economic crisis. Background to the French application: the French authorities submitted the application under the intervention criteria of Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 workers being made redundant or self-employed persons' activity ceasing, over a reference period of four months in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant by suppliers and downstream producers and / or self-employed persons whose activity has ceased. The application relates to 744 workers made redundant in GAD during the reference period of four months from 29 November 2013 to 28 March 2014. Following its assessment of this application, the Commission has concluded, in accordance with all applicable provisions of the EGF Regulation, that the conditions for awarding a financial contribution from the EGF are met. In view of the French request, it is proposed to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 918 000 to make a contribution to the package of personalised services. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: having examined the application in respect of the conditions set out in Article 13(1) of the EGF Regulation, and having taken into account the number of targeted beneficiaries, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 918 000, representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed actions, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application. The proposed decision to mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management. At the same time as it presents this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary line for the requested amount. When the Commission adopts this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, it will also adopt a decision on a financial contribution, by means of an implementing act, which will enter into force on the date at which the European Parliament and the Council adopt the proposed decision to mobilise the EGF.
-
COM(2014)0662
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2014)0662
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0044/2014
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T8-0057/2014
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2014/2166(BUD)
2014/11/12
BUDG
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the local authorities in the Bretagne region were not involved in setting up the personalised services (Cellule de reclassement) to the affected workers, even though they are in charge of vocational training; whereas the local trade union representatives of the main sites concerned were not associated to the negotiation of the measures;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Considers that the monitoring of the activity of the agencies by means of regular written reports ensures the appropriate use of the funds to provide participants a personalised career path, sufficient number of job offers and mentoring for business creation within the framework of the one-stop-shop system;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Reminds that the funds have to help the workers and not in any case to support the agencies;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d (new) 15d. Welcomes that the contracted agencies are paid according to a scale defined on the basis of the results achieved;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 e (new) 15e. Notes that 17,50% of the dismissed workers are aged between 55 and 64 years; notes furthermore that this age group is at a higher risk of prolonged unemployment and exclusion from the labour market; considers therefore that these workers may have specific needs when it comes to providing them with personalised services;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Notes that the French authorities did not request funding for preparatory activities, management and information and publicity;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Agrees with the Commission that the intervention criteria set out in Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, France is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that other factors played an important role in the company's difficulties, such as unfair competition within the internal market from competitors making an abusive use of the Posting of Workers Directive or the absence of minimum decent wage in all Members States;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Regrets, however, the insufficient association of local political authorities and trade unions; suggests, in the framework of a future review of the EGF Regulation, to include a formal consultation of the local political authorities and trade unions in the file containing the mobilisation request submitted by national authorities to the Commission; deems it necessary to better integrate the EGF to the reconversion programmes and processes of local economic fabrics;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes that the workers are already being supported with various measures helping them to find new jobs, and that, by 20 May 2014, 108 of them had already found contracts for more than six months and another 66 for less than six months, while three had started their own businesses and almost all of them had opted to remain within the region;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the personalised services
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Deplores the absence of funds devoted to EGF communication and promotion measures; considers that publicity and information around these actions plays an important role not only in attracting beneficiaries, but also in highlighting the Union's action in the social field;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Expects the Commission and the French authorities to strictly follow the principle according to which payments to the agencies will be made by instalment and on the basis of results achieved;
source: 541.622
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-11-26T00:00:00New
2014-11-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/01869
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/1 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|