Preparatory phase in Parliament
Next event: Debate in plenary scheduled 2014/12/16 more...
- Vote in plenary scheduled 2014/12/17
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | AFCO | ||
Opinion | AFET | ||
Opinion | AGRI | ||
Lead | BUDG | HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP), GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider (S&D) | |
Opinion | CONT | ||
Opinion | CULT | ||
Opinion | DEVE | ||
Opinion | ECON | ||
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | ENVI | ||
Opinion | FEMM | ||
Opinion | IMCO | ||
Opinion | INTA | ||
Opinion | ITRE | ||
Opinion | JURI | ||
Opinion | LIBE | ||
Opinion | PECH | ||
Opinion | PETI | ||
Opinion | REGI | ||
Opinion | TRAN |
Activites
-
2014/12/17
Vote in plenary scheduled
-
2014/12/16
Debate in plenary scheduled
-
2014/11/27
Commission draft budget published
-
COM(2014)0723
summary
PURPOSE: presentation of a new Draft General Budget for 2015. CONTENT: in the absence of agreement in the Conciliation Committee, the Commission now submits a new Draft Budget 2015. Background to the budgetary procedure: in accordance with the provisions laid down by the Lisbon Treaty: on 24 June 2014, the Commission transmitted the Draft Budget for 2015 in all the official languages; on 2 September 2014, Council completed its reading of the Draft Budget; on 22 October 2014, the European Parliament voted its reading. As the European Parliament adopted amendments to the Draft Budget, which could not be accepted by the Council, a Conciliation Committee was convened, in accordance with Article 314 §4(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Conciliation Committee worked over a period of twenty-one days, between 28 October and 17 November 2014. Although significant progress was made during the discussions, including as regards the acceptance of the need to mobilise the Contingency Margin for payment appropriations in 2014, it was not possible to reconcile the positions of the European Parliament and Council within the time period allowed, in particular with regard to the level of payment appropriations to meet outstanding payment needs for 2014. This prevented reaching an agreement on the 2015 budget, as well as on Draft Amending Budget No 2/2014, No 3/2014, No 4/2014, No 5/2014 and No 7/2014 as all these were considered as a package by the European Parliament and Council. A new Draft Budget 2015: in the absence of agreement in the Conciliation Committee, the Commission now submits a new Draft Budget 2015, in accordance with Article 314 §8 of the TFEU. The Commission is seeking to reconcile the positions of the two arms of the Budgetary Authority in this proposal for a new Draft Budget, without recourse to a further period of Conciliation. The consequences of non-agreement on the budget would be the recourse to provisional twelfths in 2015, with detrimental effects on the implementation of key policies and programmes and would send a damaging message to the citizens of Europe at a time of economic uncertainty. With this imperative of reaching a timely adoption of the 2015 budget, the Commission proposal for a new Draft Budget for 2015 builds on the progress made on budget 2015 in the Conciliation Committee, which to a large extent restored the Commission’s original Draft Budget, as amended by Amending Letter No 1/2015, in particular for commitments, though with a lower level for payments. This proposal also takes into account recent discussions and proposals to maximise the contribution of the EU budget to economic growth. In this regard, the proposal for a new Draft Budget is focused on supporting in particular those policies in favour of competitiveness and economic convergence, thus contributing to growth and jobs, as well as those budget lines which allow Europe to address crises especially in its neighbourhood. It also reflects the 10 priority policy areas set out in the political guidelines for the new Commission, such as boosting jobs, growth and investment, connecting the digital single market, increasing the resilience of the energy supply while fighting against global warming, securing Europe's borders and having a stronger Europe when it comes to foreign policy. The Commission’s new budget proposals: In terms of commitment appropriations, the total expenditure proposed in the new Draft Budget (DB) 2015 (including special instruments) is EUR 145 226.3 million, corresponding to 1.04% of GNI, that is EUR 2 536 million more than in 2014 (+ 1.8%), when including Draft Amending Budgets No 3/2014 and No 8/2014, and leaves a combined total margin of EUR 1 855.3 million under the various ceilings of the MFF. For payment appropriations (including special instruments), the requested total expenditure is EUR 141 337.3 million, corresponding to 1.01% of GNI. This is an increase of EUR 968 million compared to payment appropriations in the 2014 budget (+ 0.7%), when including Draft Amending Budgets No 3-8/2014, and leaves a margin of EUR 800 million under the MFF ceiling. Budgetary analysis of the headings is as follows: Heading 1a, Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs: commitment appropriations for heading 1a are set at EUR 17 488.5 million. This is an increase of 6.1% compared to the 2014 budget, which is mostly due to Horizon 2020, the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and the large infrastructure projects ‘ITER’ and ‘Copernicus’ under this heading, and leaves a margin of EUR 177.5 million. Payment appropriations increase by 31.6% to EUR 15 833.3 million. This significant increase takes into account the low level of payments in 2014 for programmes such as Horizon 2020 and the need to address the growing level of outstanding commitments while allowing for sufficient pre-financing to launch the new programmes. Heading 1b, Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion: commitment appropriations increase by 3.6% to EUR 49 230.3 million, leaving no margin. This includes the additional structural funds foreseen for Cyprus, for which the Commission proposes the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for an amount of EUR 83.3 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 11.3 million in payment appropriations. Payment appropriations decrease by 6% compared to the 2014 budget as modified by Draft Amending Budgets, to EUR 51 067.4 million. Heading 2, Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources: commitment appropriations of EUR 58 808.6 million are proposed for heading 2. This level of expenditure represents a -0.6% reduction compared to the 2014 budget and leaves a margin of EUR 790.4 million under the ceiling. Payment appropriations amount to EUR 56 231.1 million, with the same decrease (-0.6%) compared to 2014 as modified by Draft Amending Budgets. Integrating the latest update on assigned revenue, the funding for market related expenditure and direct aids reaches EUR 43 455.8 million in commitment appropriations, and EUR 43 448.3 million in payment appropriations. When combining EAGF assigned revenue and requested appropriations, global EAGF expenditure increases by EUR 273.6 million compared to the original draft budget. A margin under the subceiling for market measures and direct aids amounting to EUR 734 million is left. Heading 3, Security and Citizenship: this heading sees a 1.2% decrease in commitment appropriations to EUR 2 146.7 million, leaving a margin of EUR 99.3 million. Payment appropriations increase by 12.4% to EUR 1 884.3 million, due to the start-up of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and the Internal Security Fund. Heading 4, Global Europe: this heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 0.4% to EUR 8 356.4 million, leaving an unallocated margin of EUR 392.6 million available under the ceiling. Payment appropriations increase by 8.6% to EUR 7 428 million, mostly to take account of the rapidly growing level of outstanding commitments under this heading. Heading 5, Administration: commitment and payment appropriations for all institutions combined including pensions and European schools increase by 3.3%, for commitments (EUR 8 680.5 million) and 3.1% for payments (EUR 8 668.1 million). This takes into account the proposed transfer of "common administrative costs of EU Delegations" and the EU Special Representatives from the operational headings. The resulting unallocated margin is EUR 395.5 million. The details of the changes proposed to the original Draft Budget, as modified by Amending Letter No 1/2015, are as follows: Heading 1a - Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs: commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the original Draft Budget, with amendments to the programmes included in the table below, to reflect the priority of contributing to enhancing access to finance through the EU budget, especially for the small and middle-sized enterprises (SMEs). Heading 2 - Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources: commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget, as amended by Amending Letter 1/2015, integrating the latest update (+ EUR 273.6 million) of assigned revenue. Based on the new elements that have emerged since the presentation of Amending Letter 1/2015, notably the information on the actual uptake of the emergence measures taken since August 2014 to respond to the Russian food import ban, the final EAGF surplus for 2014 and the updated forecast of financial corrections to be collected in 2015, the emergency measures referred to above (including those related to the dairy sector in the Baltic States, for which the Commission adopted a further package on 26 November 2014, as well as for Finland once the conditions are met), can be financed within the appropriations requested in Amending Letter 1/2015 without having recourse to the agricultural crisis reserve, thanks to this additional assigned revenue. Heading 3 - Security and Citizenship: commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the original Draft Budget, with the following changes: the EUR 20 million increase in the operational expenditure of FRONTEX, is offset by a corresponding reduction of budget item (18 02 01 01) Support of border management and a common visa policy to facilitate legitimate travel. Heading 4 - Global Europe: commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the original Draft Budget. However, the appropriations related to budget item (19 03 01 07) European Union Special Representatives (EUR 20 million in commitments and EUR 9.2 million in payments) are transferred to the EEAS section of the budget. Heading 5 - Administration: the number of posts in the establishment plans of the Institutions and the commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget as amended by Amending Letter 1/2015, with the following exceptions: (i) a net reduction of 35 establishment plan posts, on the one hand due to a reduction of 47 posts for the European Parliament and an increase of 12 posts for the Court of Justice on the other hand; (ii) a net reduction in appropriations of EUR 600 000, on the one hand due to a reduction of EUR 1.4 million for the European Court of Auditors, EUR 1.4 million for the European Economic and Social Committee and EUR 400 000 for the Committee of the Regions, and an increase of EUR 2.6 million for the Court of Justice on the other hand; (iii) the increase of EUR 91.5 million for the EEAS reflects the budgetary-neutral transfer of the "common administrative costs of EU Delegations" and the EU Special Representatives, which is completely offset in the Commission section in heading 1a. Overall, these transfers result in a net increase in appropriations under heading 5 of EUR 66.3 million. The issue of payment appropriations: the Commission assessment of needs, which led to the requested increase in payment appropriations for the financial year 2014 as proposed in Draft Amending Budget (DAB) No 3/2014 remains justified, both in terms of actual implementation to date and in light of payment claims received. Although no agreement was reached in the Conciliation Committee on DAB No 3/2014, nor on DAB 5/2014 and 7/2014 on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund, these amending budgets are still part of the package to be agreed together with the 2015 budget. No agreement was reached on the level of additional payment appropriations required by DABs 3, 5 and 7, and the financing of so-called 'special instruments'. This new Draft Budget 2015 entails a EUR 800 million overall reduction of payment appropriations compared to the Commission's original Draft Budget as amended by Amending Letter 1/2015. The proposed distribution of payment appropriations in the new Draft Budget 2015 will allow continuing to reduce the backlog of unpaid bills from the past programming period for Cohesion, to address the growing level of outstanding commitments for Competitiveness and Global Europe, as well as to successfully launch the new generation of spending programmes in 2015. In this regard, the Commission stands ready to contribute to establishing, in close cooperation with the European Parliament and Council, a payment plan aiming at keeping the evolution of the backlog of unpaid bills under control.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, GEORGIEVA Kristalina
-
COM(2014)0723
summary
Documents
- Commission draft budget published: COM(2014)0723
Amendments | Dossier |
40 |
2014/2224(BUD)
2014/12/12
BUDG
40 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the "draft package" agreed, after difficult negotiations, by representatives of Parliament and Council during the trilogue of 8 December 2014 consists of three elements: Draft Amending Budgets No 3-8/2014 for an overall amount of EUR 49,8 million in commitment appropriations and additional EUR 3 529,6 million from fresh money in payment appropriations,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Regrets however that the Council was once again not willing to complement its political declarations with sufficient budgetary resources regarding the support for jobs and growth and the Union's international commitments, which it demonstrated by not agreeing to budgeting up to the MFF ceiling in Headings 1a and 4; is
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the research and innovation programmes of the EU, a fundamental pillar of growth strategy, should support social development and resolve problems of the European Union such as poverty and social exclusion;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that the EU Budget must promote social development and cohesion over austerity, wage reductions and distortion of social fabric in countries under adjustment programmes;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Urges the Commission, in view of the deepening of the crisis and the significant increase in poverty to which this is giving rise, to make combating poverty a genuine priority by putting forward specific measures to reduce poverty and arrangements under which the EU budget can be used to supplement action taken by Member States;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Highlights that the EU austerity policies have created a downward pressure on real wages in Member States and that this will prolong the economic and social crisis; underlines that the EU budget should be used to underpin efforts to increase real wages as well as to fight social-dumping in the Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Notes with concern that, while the proposed level of payment appropriations will be mainly dedicated to covering outstanding commitments and the winding down of programmes while at same time most of the instruments have seen their scopes increased (e.g.: Fund for most deprived), the Commission declares that the payments backlog will continue to grow above the EUR 23,4 billion already reached at the end of 2013, even with DAB 3/2014 adoption;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the end of the mechanisms introduced by the new CPR such as the macroeconomic conditionalities and the performance reserve, which could punish local and regional authorities in a budgetary context they are not responsible for;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recalls that instruments such as the ESF, the ERDF, the Cohesion Fund or the Youth Employment Initiative are of particular importance during a crisis, and that the first victims of payment decrease are always the weaker stakeholders, such as Member States with budgetary constraints, local and regional authorities, outermost regions, SMEs, NGOs, social partners;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Is opposed to the EU budget being used to fund a militarist, neo-liberal Union; points to the need for a different approach which supports sustainable development, stronger, environment- friendly domestic demand based on higher wages, full employment based on jobs with rights, social well-being, the eradication of poverty and social exclusion, and economic and social cohesion;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the "draft package" agreed, after difficult negotiations, by representatives of Parliament and Council during the trilogue of 8 December 2014 consists of three elements: Draft Amending Budgets No 3-8/2014 for an overall amount of EUR 49,8 million in commitment appropriations and additional EUR 3 529,6 million from fresh money in
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Recalls that EU funds, including research grants from the Commission, shall not fund military projects; stresses that the concept of dual-use technology shall not be used as a loophole to fund projects with a de facto military aim such as drones for high-tech warfare and security surveillance;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes however that, particularly with regard to payments, the budgetary negotiations have become more and more difficult over the past years, mainly due to the uncompromising position of the Council; underlines once again its position that the main function of the budgetary procedure should be to agree on the political priorities in budgetary commitments, whereas payments should simply be considered as a technical follow- up to honour these commitments; reminds the Council of the definitions of the type of appropriations in Article 10(3) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union and its rules of application, stating that "payment appropriations shall cover payments made to honour the legal commitments entered into the financial year or preceding financial years";
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes with concern the clear statement of the 6th Cohesion Report that regional disparities widened in particular during the crisis years 2008-2011, meaning that efforts of cohesion policy will have to be significantly increased in order to reach the goals of economic, social and territorial cohesion as stipulated in Article 174 TFEU;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes that 2015 will be the second year of implementation of the new ESI funds cycle; underscores the need for sufficient commitment and payment appropriations in order to ensure that the programmes reach the intended number of beneficiaries and thus impact;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the fact that Council, in the end, agreed to the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2014, even though to a lower amount than needed; welcomes furthermore the overall reinforcement in payments in the 2014 budget, on a number of budget lines up to a level EUR 4,2 billion, of which EUR 3 168,2 million will be mobilised through the Contingency Margin for 2014 as well as the fact that the increases proposed in DAB No 3/2014 in payment appropriations for Heading 1a and Heading 4 have been largely preserved in the final compromise; reminds that the Parliament already in its reading on the budget 2014 envisaged the higher need for payment appropriations (final agreement was EUR 983 million lower than the adopted Parliament position); calls on the Council not to try to artificially cut the EU budget every year;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the fact that Council, in the end, agreed to the mobilisation of the
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Disapproves however of the Council’s position of not using the full amount of the extra revenue from fines to cover outstanding payment needs; is of the opinion that until the payment crisis is resolved, all windfall revenue should be fully used to address this problem; recalls that the draft package has been reached because it was meeting the Parliament's demand to stabilize the outstanding payments problem; underlines however that a genuine solution of the EU payment crisis requires an adequate limit of unpaid bills;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls that, according to Article 310 TEUF, the revenue and expenditure shown in the EU budget shall be in balance;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Reiterates its long-standing position that the payments of special instruments should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings, as is the case for commitments; regrets that, once more, it has not been made possible to reach an agreement with Council on this point; stresses, however, that all efforts need to be made towards a definite agreement on this point at the earliest possible date;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers it extremely important to put an end to much of military spending and spending on external representation, clamping down on migrants (in particular through Frontex) and propaganda;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Considers it extremely important to secure a net increase in the appropriations against EU budget lines relating to economic and social cohesion to at least double the current amounts, together with a radical change in the way in which the appropriations are allocated; believes an immediate revision of the MFF also to be extremely important, in order to secure a net increase in the amounts currently provided for, which should be at least doubled; considers it extremely important for the funds for this increase to be made available by raising the contributions of the Member States with the highest GNI and per capita income, which will require changes to be made to the current breakdown among Member States;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reaffirms its position that a
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Believes that we need to move away from the policies currently being pursued by the EU if we are really serious about solving problems relating to sustainable economic growth, poverty, unemployment, social exclusion and inequalities (income); stresses the need for a strategy setting out a new way forward for Europe, towards full employment, decent jobs, decent pay, social and economic cohesion, universal welfare provision and the highest possible living standards, which takes account of each Member State’s development needs, in particular those of the least-advanced Member States, and which fosters genuine convergence by helping to narrow the development gap between Member States and reduce economic, social and regional disparities;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Without prejudge the opinions of the High Level Group on Own Resources, it must be stated that "own resources" means that they are not Member States' resources but EU resources; the Member States collect them for the EU and therefore should not include them in their revenues, neither its transference to the EU account as expenses; the Member States are not contributors to the EU but collectors following the Treaties and they are net recipients through the EU programs that they implement;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Considers it extremely important for the funds for this increase to be made available by raising the contributions of the Member States with the highest GNI and per capita income, which will require changes to be made to the current breakdown among Member States;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Regrets the unwillingness of both Council and Commission to provide EU agencies with the necessary resources, especially with regard to staff, to fulfil the mandates they were given by the legislative authority and underlines that the present agreement does not imply an acceptance by Parliament of the redeployment pool concept by the Commission; furthermore, highly regrets the staff cuts in fee-financed agencies and considers them unjustified as far as the respective posts are not financed from the EU budget;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Insists on the need to enhance its support for the Middle East Peace Process and its determination to ensure the adequate amount of funding to UNRWA and the Palestinian Authority by increasing the level of commitment appropriations to EUR 300 million in payments and to increase it up to EUR 300 million in commitments in order to provide sufficient resources to ease the dramatic humanitarian situation and to support the efforts of reconstruction in the Gaza strip; is astonished that the Council has once again reduced the DB payment appropriations for UNRWA and the Palestinian Authority without clear justification; considers this line under- budgeted already in the DB;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the implementation of the first phase of the cooperation agreement between the Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Deplores, however, that the Council refused a budgetary neutral transfer of the appropriations for European Union Special Representatives from Section III (Commission) to Section X (EEAS) of the budget, which was supported by both Parliament and the Commission; considers that this refusal of the Council runs counter to the aim of a visible, coherent and efficient foreign policy of the Union;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Considers that the level of payments agreed both for 2014 and 2015 reaches the minimum required to stabilise the level of unpaid bills at year-end; is, therefore, satisfied by this result that is attributed to the strong determination of Parliament’s negotiating team throughout this year’s budgetary negotiations; recalls that a satisfactory level of payments was the primary objective of Parliament in these negotiations;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Regrets, in general, Council's inability to find a common position, especially during the 21-day conciliation period and with regard to the adoption of the Draft
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Underlines that, while enabling the Commission to respond to the most urgent payments needs in 2014, the level of additional payment appropriations brought to the 2014 budget will not be sufficient to solve the recurrent snowball effect of unpaid bills in 2015; hence, puts the emphasis on the joint statement on a payment plan which accompanies the agreement package on budget 2014 and budget 2015;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1b (new) 1b. Is convinced, however, that efforts need to be stepped up in the coming years with the view of reducing the level of unpaid bills, with a particular focus on cohesion policy, to a sustainable level; stresses, in this respect, the joint commitment of the three EU Institutions to consider any possible means to reduce the level of those bills, as set out in the joint statement on a payment plan accompanying this year’s budgetary agreement;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers it extremely important to set up support to Member States, in particular those already in recession, in connection with investment in infrastructure, public amenities, research, innovation and development;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the increase of EUR 244,2 million in the overall level of commitment appropriations compared to the original position of the Council of 2 September 2014; is satisfied with the fact that the EUR 521,9 million of cuts by the Council in commitments have been fully reversed and that a further EUR 170,7 million of commitments have been added, including the full package of pilot projects and preparatory actions and EUR 95 million for Horizon 2020, COSME, ERASMUS and humanitarian Aid;
source: 544.380
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014DC0723:EN
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/3/date |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0723/COM_COM(2014)0723_EN.pdf
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|