BETA


2014/2229(INI) Security challenges in the MENA region and prospects for political stability

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET PEILLON Vincent (icon: S&D S&D) MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion FEMM ARENA Maria (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2015/07/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/07/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 400 votes to 98 with 86 abstentions a resolution on the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the prospects for political stability. It noted that the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya and the increase in tensions in the MENA region were major sources of destabilisation of that region and that the risks for European security, citizens and interests were serious . However, stabilisation in the region was not a security issue alone , but also had economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union and its Member States to develop strategic global and multifaceted policies. However, there were persistent difficulties in discerning a coherent conflict resolution strategy and establishing a legitimate and reliable basis for inclusive dialogue with the parties concerned.

Addressing the threats and the security situation : Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach. It welcomed the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, whether in the form of military strikes or through logistical, financial and humanitarian participation. However, it called for increased mobilisation in all spheres, with better-articulated actions, which could be coordinated as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation. To this end, Parliament called on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence. Parliament deplored the fact that CSDP operations deployed (EUBAM Libya , EUPOL COPPS and EUBAM Rafah) we re too small and out of step with the security challenges in the region, and called for a strategic reassessment of these deployments .

At the same time, Parliament stressed that a tailored response must be found, based on political and cross-regional differences, to the issue of combating ISIL/Da’esh, and the al-Nusra Front . It called on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the League of Arab States (LAS), Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, and address the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011. The EU must put in place a genuine common foreign policy. The VP/HR must work with EU foreign ministers to ensure a constant high-level dialogue with the countries of the region.

Parliament stressed the importance of regional dialogues with Turkey and Iran. Welcoming the recent agreement reached by the EU3+3 and Iran on the latter's nuclear programme, it called on the VP/HR and the Member States, in the event of a final agreement on the nuclear issue , to engage in promoting confidence-building measures between Iran and Saudi Arabia . Turkey could play a major role, as a member of NATO, in the fight against ISIL/Da’esh and in stabilising Iraq and Syria. Parliament called on Turkey to clear away certain ambiguities and take a more active part in combating Da’esh/ISIL in cooperation with the EU.

Members went on to stress the following:

the EU and the Arab world must assess the root causes of radicalisation and adopt a global approach, whereby inclusivity should be a guiding principle. Unless a practical, sustainable solution is found, any action to neutralise the threat posed by ISIL/Da’esh and other terrorist groups would encounter increased and persistent difficulties; the attempts to tailor EU humanitarian assistance to gender- and age-specific needs was welcomed. Members noted the allocation of EUR 1 billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat', under which EUR 400 million had been earmarked for humanitarian aid; all EU Member States must increase their commitments in relation to the refugee crisis in terms of financial resources and resettlement of the most vulnerable refugees in the region, and special attention must be given to Jordan and Lebanon , which were absorbing the biggest share of refugees in proportion to their population; Member States should step up their efforts in hosting asylum seekers from Syria and Iraq and in swiftly addressing the build-up of pending cases; Member States should pool their resources, enhance the existing mechanisms (Frontex, Eurosur) and establish a European PNR in order to improve controls at the EU’s external borders; conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority should be put in place for a definitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security, based on the 1967 borders and with Jerusalem as capital of both states.

Stepping up the global strategy for democracy and human rights : Parliament convinced that the lack of democracy was one of the fundamental causes of political instability in the region. It stressed the need to enhance long-term stability in the MENA region through continuing EU support to civil society , notably though the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the ENI Civil Society Facility, as well as through new pro-democracy tools such as the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). Member States were called on to provide the Endowment's budget with sufficient funding.

Whilst welcoming the broad consultation on ENP revision, Parliament stressed the importance of preserving the current balance of distribution of funds for the allocation of ENP funding. Countries making progress in implementing reforms should be granted decisive additional support, with particular attention to Tunisia.

Members called for a special programme for the support and rehabilitation of women and girls who were victims of sexual violence and slavery in conflict areas in the MENA region, especially Syria and Iraq.

They went on to stress the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda and to home-grown radicalisation. This counter-narrative should be based on the promotion of common values founded on the universality of human rights and should discredit the idea of a conflict between religions or civilisations. Parliament wanted EEAS to appoint staff speaking the languages of the MENA region to increase the effectiveness of communication.

It also highlighted the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), and reiterated the importance of revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and reviving its political ambition.

Strengthening cooperation for economic development : Parliament took the view that strategic dialogue between the EU and the MENA countries should help to iron out inequalities and creating job and education opportunities, mainly for young people. It stressed the need to facilitate access to the EU single market for the MENA countries, while providing all necessary protection, as well as to encourage European investments .

Noting that the upheavals could jeopardise the EU's energy security , Parliament suggested that the EU engage more strongly in energy diplomacy in the MENA region, as outlined in the Energy Union. Supplying energy to countries in the EUʼs southern neighbourhood was important both strategically and in economic terms.

Parliament regretted that a minimum one-year period was necessary for the release of macro-financial assistance to countries in a very precarious financial situation and urged the deployment of a new procedural dimension for EU aid , both in regard to aid through EU external action financial instruments and at macro-financial assistance level. In addition, the EU must adequately assess the socio-economic and human rights impact of the measures requested from beneficiary countries in order to ensure that such assistance does not constitute a factor of instability, for example by undermining welfare services.

Lastly, Parliament called on the MENA countries to diversify their economies and imports , noting that the great majorit y of the MENA countries’ trade wa s with non-MENA countries . It regretted the deadlock faced by the EU with regard to the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU) , and called for the regional integration of the Maghreb countries.

Documents
2015/07/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/07/08
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/06/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Vincent PEILLON (S&D, FR) on the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the prospects for political stability. It noted that the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya and the increase in tensions in the MENA region were major sources of destabilisation of that region and that the risks for European security, citizens and interests were serious . However, stabilisation in the region was not a security issue alone , but also had economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union and its Member States to develop strategic global and multifaceted policies.

Members felt that, having been forced to take emergency measures in response to successive crises that the EU had failed to anticipate in the MENA region despite some signals, the EU had been unable to analyse the key elements or deal with the complexity of the situation , expectations and prospects created by the Arab uprisings of 2011. Above all, the EU had failed to respond to the need for a very long-term strategy to sustain and assist genuine democratic transition, economic development and political stability.

Addressing the threats and the security situation : the committee called on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach. Whilst welcoming the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, it emphasised the need for better-articulated actions, which could be coordinated as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation, and to this end, Members called on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence.

At the same time, they called on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the League of Arab States (LAS), Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, and address the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011. Members asked the VP/HR to ensure a constant high-level dialogue with the countries of the region. They went on to stress the following:

the EU and the Arab world must assess the root causes of radicalisation and adopt a global approach, whereby inclusivity should be a guiding principle. Unless a practical, sustainable solution is found, any action to neutralise the threat posed by ISIL/Da’esh and other terrorist groups would encounter increased and persistent difficulties; the attempts to tailor EU humanitarian assistance to gender- and age-specific needs was welcome; Members noted the allocation of EUR 1 billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat', under which EUR 400 million had been earmarked for humanitarian aid; all EU Member States must increase their commitments in relation to the refugee crisis in terms of financial resources and resettlement of the most vulnerable refugees in the region, and special attention must be given to Jordan and Lebanon , which were absorbing the biggest share of refugees in proportion to their population; Member States should step up their efforts in hosting asylum seekers and in swiftly addressing the build-up of pending cases; the EU must actively engage in promoting confidence-building measures between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and step up the counter-terrorism cooperation with Turkey, which could play a major role in the fight against ISIL/Da’esh and in stabilising Iraq and Syria, as a member of NATO; conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority should be put in place for a definitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security, based on the 1967 borders and with Jerusalem as capital of both states.

Stepping up the global strategy for democracy and human rights : Members were convinced that the lack of democracy was one of the fundamental causes of political instability in the region. They stressed the need to enhance long-term stability in the MENA region through continuing EU support to civil society , notably though the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the ENI Civil Society Facility, as well as through new pro-democracy tools such as the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). Member States were called on to provide the Endowment's budget with sufficient funding.

Whilst welcoming the broad consultation on ENP revision, the report stressed the importance of preserving the current balance of distribution of funds for the allocation of ENP funding. Countries making progress in implementing reforms should be granted decisive additional support, with particular attention to Tunisia.

Members called for a special programme for the support and rehabilitation of women and girls who were victims of sexual violence and slavery in conflict areas in the MENA region, especially Syria and Iraq.

They went on to stress the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda and to home-grown radicalisation. This counter-narrative should be based on the promotion of common values founded on the universality of human rights and should discredit the idea of a conflict between religions or civilisations. Members wanted EEAS to appoint staff speaking the languages of the MENA region to increase the effectiveness of communication.

The report also highlighted the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), and reiterated the importance of revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and reviving its political ambition.

Strengthening cooperation for economic development : Members took the view that strategic dialogue between the EU and the MENA countries should help to iron out inequalities and creating job and education opportunities, mainly for young people. They stressed the need to facilitate access to the EU single market for the MENA countries, while providing all necessary protection, as well as to encourage European investments .

Noting that the upheavals could jeopardise the EU's energy security , Members suggested that the EU engage more strongly in energy diplomacy in the MENA region, as outlined in the Energy Union. Supplying energy to countries in the EUʼs southern neighbourhood was important both strategically and in economic terms.

Lastly, the committee regretted that a minimum one-year period was necessary for the release of macro-financial assistance to countries in a very precarious financial situation and urged the deployment of a new procedural dimension for EU aid , both in regard to aid through EU external action financial instruments and at macro-financial assistance level. In addition, the EU must adequately assess the socio-economic and human rights impact of the measures requested from beneficiary countries in order to ensure that such assistance does not constitute a factor of instability, for example by undermining welfare services.

Documents
2015/06/11
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/05/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/04/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/04/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/03/12
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/02/10
   EP - ARENA Maria (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2015/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/10/07
   EP - PEILLON Vincent (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon - § 1/5 #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 509, -: 57, 0: 25
DE FR GB PL RO ES BE IT HU AT BG CZ NL SK SE FI HR LT PT DK EE SI LV LU MT IE ?? CY EL
Total
79
62
55
47
27
32
19
52
16
15
14
20
22
12
16
12
10
8
16
11
6
6
6
5
5
10
1
1
5
icon: PPE PPE
167

Sweden PPE

2
2

Portugal PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Greece PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
155
3

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

France Verts/ALE

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2
icon: NI NI
7

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Greece NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Greece GUE/NGL

2

A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon - § 1/6 #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 352, -: 208, 0: 16
RO HU BG IT BE PL CZ HR SK PT AT FR LT ES FI EE MT SI LU LV IE CY NL SE EL ?? DE DK GB
Total
26
16
13
51
18
47
20
10
12
15
14
61
8
30
12
6
5
6
5
7
9
1
21
16
5
1
76
11
54
icon: PPE PPE
162

Portugal PPE

3
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Sweden PPE

2

Greece PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
151
3

Croatia S&D

2

Austria S&D

For (1)

4

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2

Sweden S&D

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

5

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Romania ALDE

3
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
6

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Italy ENF

For (1)

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon - § 1/7 #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 352, -: 198, 0: 32
RO BG IT HU BE CZ ES PT SK FR LT HR FI MT LU EE AT SI PL LV IE NL CY GB SE EL ?? DK DE
Total
27
15
50
16
19
20
32
16
11
63
8
10
12
5
4
6
13
6
45
7
10
23
1
53
16
5
1
11
77
icon: PPE PPE
165

Portugal PPE

3
2

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Sweden PPE

2

Greece PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
152
3

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Austria S&D

Against (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2

Cyprus S&D

1

Sweden S&D

Against (2)

5

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: NI NI
7

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

Italy ENF

For (1)

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

2

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon - § 1/8 #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 341, -: 212, 0: 20
RO BG HU BE IT CZ SK PT FR LT DE HR ES NL EE LU PL LV SI FI MT AT CY IE EL ?? DK SE GB
Total
26
15
16
18
50
20
12
15
63
8
73
10
29
22
6
5
45
7
5
12
5
14
1
9
5
1
11
15
54
icon: PPE PPE
163

Portugal PPE

3
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

3

Malta PPE

2
3

Greece PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
146

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Austria S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
7

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Italy ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Poland ENF

2

Austria ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon - § 2/2 #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 433, -: 146, 0: 12
DE IT RO HU BG ES FR AT NL BE LT CZ PT FI HR SK SE EE SI LU MT LV PL IE DK CY EL ?? GB
Total
79
51
26
16
15
31
63
15
23
19
8
20
16
12
10
12
16
6
6
5
5
7
47
10
11
1
5
1
54
icon: PPE PPE
168
2

Portugal PPE

3

Sweden PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
153

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Croatia S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

5

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
7

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon - Résolution #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 400, -: 98, 0: 86
DE IT RO ES BG FR HU GB BE SE PL CZ SK NL FI LT PT HR LU EE AT DK SI LV IE MT CY ?? EL
Total
79
51
26
33
15
62
16
54
19
16
46
20
12
23
12
8
14
9
5
5
15
11
5
7
9
5
1
1
4
icon: PPE PPE
163

Sweden PPE

2
2

Portugal PPE

2
4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Greece PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
154

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

France Verts/ALE

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
7

France NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Austria ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Greece GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
398 2014/2229(INI)
2015/04/14 FEMM 37 amendments...
source: 554.706
2015/04/17 AFET 361 amendments...
source: 554.819

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.275
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-549275_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.819
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-554819_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.847
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-554847_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.923&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-551923_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-06-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0193_EN.html title: A8-0193/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-06-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0193_EN.html title: A8-0193/2015
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150708&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2015-07-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0271_EN.html title: T8-0271/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-07-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0271_EN.html title: T8-0271/2015
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: PEILLON Vincent date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-10-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PEILLON Vincent group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria date: 2015-02-10T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0193&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0193_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0271
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0271_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PEILLON Vincent body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2015-02-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
  • date: 2015-06-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PEILLON Vincent body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2015-02-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
  • date: 2015-06-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0193&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0193/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-07-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150708&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0271 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0271/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-10-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PEILLON Vincent group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2014-10-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: PEILLON Vincent
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
docs
  • date: 2015-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.275 title: PE549.275 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.819 title: PE554.819 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.847 title: PE554.847 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.923&secondRef=02 title: PE551.923 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-11T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0193&language=EN title: A8-0193/2015 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Vincent PEILLON (S&D, FR) on the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the prospects for political stability. It noted that the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya and the increase in tensions in the MENA region were major sources of destabilisation of that region and that the risks for European security, citizens and interests were serious . However, stabilisation in the region was not a security issue alone , but also had economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union and its Member States to develop strategic global and multifaceted policies. Members felt that, having been forced to take emergency measures in response to successive crises that the EU had failed to anticipate in the MENA region despite some signals, the EU had been unable to analyse the key elements or deal with the complexity of the situation , expectations and prospects created by the Arab uprisings of 2011. Above all, the EU had failed to respond to the need for a very long-term strategy to sustain and assist genuine democratic transition, economic development and political stability. Addressing the threats and the security situation : the committee called on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach. Whilst welcoming the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, it emphasised the need for better-articulated actions, which could be coordinated as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation, and to this end, Members called on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence. At the same time, they called on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the League of Arab States (LAS), Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, and address the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011. Members asked the VP/HR to ensure a constant high-level dialogue with the countries of the region. They went on to stress the following: the EU and the Arab world must assess the root causes of radicalisation and adopt a global approach, whereby inclusivity should be a guiding principle. Unless a practical, sustainable solution is found, any action to neutralise the threat posed by ISIL/Da’esh and other terrorist groups would encounter increased and persistent difficulties; the attempts to tailor EU humanitarian assistance to gender- and age-specific needs was welcome; Members noted the allocation of EUR 1 billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat', under which EUR 400 million had been earmarked for humanitarian aid; all EU Member States must increase their commitments in relation to the refugee crisis in terms of financial resources and resettlement of the most vulnerable refugees in the region, and special attention must be given to Jordan and Lebanon , which were absorbing the biggest share of refugees in proportion to their population; Member States should step up their efforts in hosting asylum seekers and in swiftly addressing the build-up of pending cases; the EU must actively engage in promoting confidence-building measures between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and step up the counter-terrorism cooperation with Turkey, which could play a major role in the fight against ISIL/Da’esh and in stabilising Iraq and Syria, as a member of NATO; conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority should be put in place for a definitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security, based on the 1967 borders and with Jerusalem as capital of both states. Stepping up the global strategy for democracy and human rights : Members were convinced that the lack of democracy was one of the fundamental causes of political instability in the region. They stressed the need to enhance long-term stability in the MENA region through continuing EU support to civil society , notably though the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the ENI Civil Society Facility, as well as through new pro-democracy tools such as the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). Member States were called on to provide the Endowment's budget with sufficient funding. Whilst welcoming the broad consultation on ENP revision, the report stressed the importance of preserving the current balance of distribution of funds for the allocation of ENP funding. Countries making progress in implementing reforms should be granted decisive additional support, with particular attention to Tunisia. Members called for a special programme for the support and rehabilitation of women and girls who were victims of sexual violence and slavery in conflict areas in the MENA region, especially Syria and Iraq. They went on to stress the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda and to home-grown radicalisation. This counter-narrative should be based on the promotion of common values founded on the universality of human rights and should discredit the idea of a conflict between religions or civilisations. Members wanted EEAS to appoint staff speaking the languages of the MENA region to increase the effectiveness of communication. The report also highlighted the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), and reiterated the importance of revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and reviving its political ambition. Strengthening cooperation for economic development : Members took the view that strategic dialogue between the EU and the MENA countries should help to iron out inequalities and creating job and education opportunities, mainly for young people. They stressed the need to facilitate access to the EU single market for the MENA countries, while providing all necessary protection, as well as to encourage European investments . Noting that the upheavals could jeopardise the EU's energy security , Members suggested that the EU engage more strongly in energy diplomacy in the MENA region, as outlined in the Energy Union. Supplying energy to countries in the EUʼs southern neighbourhood was important both strategically and in economic terms. Lastly, the committee regretted that a minimum one-year period was necessary for the release of macro-financial assistance to countries in a very precarious financial situation and urged the deployment of a new procedural dimension for EU aid , both in regard to aid through EU external action financial instruments and at macro-financial assistance level. In addition, the EU must adequately assess the socio-economic and human rights impact of the measures requested from beneficiary countries in order to ensure that such assistance does not constitute a factor of instability, for example by undermining welfare services.
  • date: 2015-07-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150708&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25909&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0271 title: T8-0271/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 400 votes to 98 with 86 abstentions a resolution on the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the prospects for political stability. It noted that the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya and the increase in tensions in the MENA region were major sources of destabilisation of that region and that the risks for European security, citizens and interests were serious . However, stabilisation in the region was not a security issue alone , but also had economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union and its Member States to develop strategic global and multifaceted policies. However, there were persistent difficulties in discerning a coherent conflict resolution strategy and establishing a legitimate and reliable basis for inclusive dialogue with the parties concerned. Addressing the threats and the security situation : Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach. It welcomed the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, whether in the form of military strikes or through logistical, financial and humanitarian participation. However, it called for increased mobilisation in all spheres, with better-articulated actions, which could be coordinated as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation. To this end, Parliament called on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence. Parliament deplored the fact that CSDP operations deployed (EUBAM Libya , EUPOL COPPS and EUBAM Rafah) we re too small and out of step with the security challenges in the region, and called for a strategic reassessment of these deployments . At the same time, Parliament stressed that a tailored response must be found, based on political and cross-regional differences, to the issue of combating ISIL/Da’esh, and the al-Nusra Front . It called on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the League of Arab States (LAS), Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, and address the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011. The EU must put in place a genuine common foreign policy. The VP/HR must work with EU foreign ministers to ensure a constant high-level dialogue with the countries of the region. Parliament stressed the importance of regional dialogues with Turkey and Iran. Welcoming the recent agreement reached by the EU3+3 and Iran on the latter's nuclear programme, it called on the VP/HR and the Member States, in the event of a final agreement on the nuclear issue , to engage in promoting confidence-building measures between Iran and Saudi Arabia . Turkey could play a major role, as a member of NATO, in the fight against ISIL/Da’esh and in stabilising Iraq and Syria. Parliament called on Turkey to clear away certain ambiguities and take a more active part in combating Da’esh/ISIL in cooperation with the EU. Members went on to stress the following: the EU and the Arab world must assess the root causes of radicalisation and adopt a global approach, whereby inclusivity should be a guiding principle. Unless a practical, sustainable solution is found, any action to neutralise the threat posed by ISIL/Da’esh and other terrorist groups would encounter increased and persistent difficulties; the attempts to tailor EU humanitarian assistance to gender- and age-specific needs was welcomed. Members noted the allocation of EUR 1 billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat', under which EUR 400 million had been earmarked for humanitarian aid; all EU Member States must increase their commitments in relation to the refugee crisis in terms of financial resources and resettlement of the most vulnerable refugees in the region, and special attention must be given to Jordan and Lebanon , which were absorbing the biggest share of refugees in proportion to their population; Member States should step up their efforts in hosting asylum seekers from Syria and Iraq and in swiftly addressing the build-up of pending cases; Member States should pool their resources, enhance the existing mechanisms (Frontex, Eurosur) and establish a European PNR in order to improve controls at the EU’s external borders; conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority should be put in place for a definitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security, based on the 1967 borders and with Jerusalem as capital of both states. Stepping up the global strategy for democracy and human rights : Parliament convinced that the lack of democracy was one of the fundamental causes of political instability in the region. It stressed the need to enhance long-term stability in the MENA region through continuing EU support to civil society , notably though the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the ENI Civil Society Facility, as well as through new pro-democracy tools such as the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). Member States were called on to provide the Endowment's budget with sufficient funding. Whilst welcoming the broad consultation on ENP revision, Parliament stressed the importance of preserving the current balance of distribution of funds for the allocation of ENP funding. Countries making progress in implementing reforms should be granted decisive additional support, with particular attention to Tunisia. Members called for a special programme for the support and rehabilitation of women and girls who were victims of sexual violence and slavery in conflict areas in the MENA region, especially Syria and Iraq. They went on to stress the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda and to home-grown radicalisation. This counter-narrative should be based on the promotion of common values founded on the universality of human rights and should discredit the idea of a conflict between religions or civilisations. Parliament wanted EEAS to appoint staff speaking the languages of the MENA region to increase the effectiveness of communication. It also highlighted the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), and reiterated the importance of revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and reviving its political ambition. Strengthening cooperation for economic development : Parliament took the view that strategic dialogue between the EU and the MENA countries should help to iron out inequalities and creating job and education opportunities, mainly for young people. It stressed the need to facilitate access to the EU single market for the MENA countries, while providing all necessary protection, as well as to encourage European investments . Noting that the upheavals could jeopardise the EU's energy security , Parliament suggested that the EU engage more strongly in energy diplomacy in the MENA region, as outlined in the Energy Union. Supplying energy to countries in the EUʼs southern neighbourhood was important both strategically and in economic terms. Parliament regretted that a minimum one-year period was necessary for the release of macro-financial assistance to countries in a very precarious financial situation and urged the deployment of a new procedural dimension for EU aid , both in regard to aid through EU external action financial instruments and at macro-financial assistance level. In addition, the EU must adequately assess the socio-economic and human rights impact of the measures requested from beneficiary countries in order to ensure that such assistance does not constitute a factor of instability, for example by undermining welfare services. Lastly, Parliament called on the MENA countries to diversify their economies and imports , noting that the great majorit y of the MENA countries’ trade wa s with non-MENA countries . It regretted the deadlock faced by the EU with regard to the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU) , and called for the regional integration of the Maghreb countries.
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/02276
    New
    • AFET/8/02276
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10.05 Peace preservation, humanitarian and rescue tasks, crisis management
    • 6.40.05.06 Relations with the countries of the Middle East
    New
    6.10.05
    Peace preservation, humanitarian and rescue tasks, crisis management
    6.40.05.06
    Relations with the countries of the Middle East
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Vincent PEILLON (S&D, FR) on the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the prospects for political stability. It noted that the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya and the increase in tensions in the MENA region were major sources of destabilisation of that region and that the risks for European security, citizens and interests were serious. However, stabilisation in the region was not a security issue alone, but also had economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union and its Member States to develop strategic global and multifaceted policies.

      Members felt that, having been forced to take emergency measures in response to successive crises that the EU had failed to anticipate in the MENA region despite some signals, the EU had been unable to analyse the key elements or deal with the complexity of the situation, expectations and prospects created by the Arab uprisings of 2011. Above all, the EU had failed to respond to the need for a very long-term strategy to sustain and assist genuine democratic transition, economic development and political stability.

      Addressing the threats and the security situation: the committee called on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach. Whilst welcoming the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, it emphasised the need for better-articulated actions, which could be coordinated as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation, and to this end, Members called on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence.

      At the same time, they called on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the League of Arab States (LAS), Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, and address the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011. Members asked the VP/HR to ensure a constant high-level dialogue with the countries of the region. They went on to stress the following:

      • the EU and the Arab world must assess the root causes of radicalisation and adopt a global approach, whereby inclusivity should be a guiding principle. Unless a practical, sustainable solution is found, any action to neutralise the threat posed by ISIL/Da’esh and other terrorist groups would encounter increased and persistent difficulties;
      • the attempts to tailor EU humanitarian assistance to gender- and age-specific needs was welcome; Members noted the allocation of EUR 1 billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat', under which EUR 400 million had been earmarked for humanitarian aid;
      • all EU Member States must increase their commitments in relation to the refugee crisis in terms of financial resources and resettlement of the most vulnerable refugees in the region, and special attention must be given to Jordan and Lebanon, which were absorbing the biggest share of refugees in proportion to their population;
      • Member States should step up their efforts in hosting asylum seekers and in swiftly addressing the build-up of pending cases;
      • the EU must actively engage in promoting confidence-building measures between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and step up the counter-terrorism cooperation with Turkey, which could play a major role in the fight against ISIL/Da’esh and in stabilising Iraq and Syria, as a member of NATO;
      • conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority should be put in place for a definitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security, based on the 1967 borders and with Jerusalem as capital of both states.

      Stepping up the global strategy for democracy and human rights: Members were convinced that the lack of democracy was one of the fundamental causes of political instability in the region. They stressed the need to enhance long-term stability in the MENA region through continuing EU support to civil society, notably though the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the ENI Civil Society Facility, as well as through new pro-democracy tools such as the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). Member States were called on to provide the Endowment's budget with sufficient funding.

      Whilst welcoming the broad consultation on ENP revision, the report stressed the importance of preserving the current balance of distribution of funds for the allocation of ENP funding. Countries making progress in implementing reforms should be granted decisive additional support, with particular attention to Tunisia.

      Members called for a special programme for the support and rehabilitation of women and girls who were victims of sexual violence and slavery in conflict areas in the MENA region, especially Syria and Iraq.

      They went on to stress the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda and to home-grown radicalisation. This counter-narrative should be based on the promotion of common values founded on the universality of human rights and should discredit the idea of a conflict between religions or civilisations. Members wanted EEAS to appoint staff speaking the languages of the MENA region to increase the effectiveness of communication.

      The report also highlighted the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), and reiterated the importance of revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and reviving its political ambition.

      Strengthening cooperation for economic development: Members took the view that strategic dialogue between the EU and the MENA countries should help to iron out inequalities and creating job and education opportunities, mainly for young people. They stressed the need to facilitate access to the EU single market for the MENA countries, while providing all necessary protection, as well as to encourage European investments

      Noting that the upheavals could jeopardise the EU's energy security, Members suggested that the EU engage more strongly in energy diplomacy in the MENA region, as outlined in the Energy Union. Supplying energy to countries in the EUʼs southern neighbourhood was important both strategically and in economic terms.

      Lastly, the committee regretted that a minimum one-year period was necessary for the release of macro-financial assistance to countries in a very precarious financial situation and urged the deployment of a new procedural dimension for EU aid, both in regard to aid through EU external action financial instruments and at macro-financial assistance level. In addition, the EU must adequately assess the socio-economic and human rights impact of the measures requested from beneficiary countries in order to ensure that such assistance does not constitute a factor of instability, for example by undermining welfare services.

    activities/4/docs/0/text
    • The European Parliament adopted by 400 votes to 98 with 86 abstentions a resolution on the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the prospects for political stability. It noted that the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya and the increase in tensions in the MENA region were major sources of destabilisation of that region and that the risks for European security, citizens and interests were serious. However, stabilisation in the region was not a security issue alone, but also had economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union and its Member States to develop strategic global and multifaceted policies. However, there were persistent difficulties in discerning a coherent conflict resolution strategy and establishing a legitimate and reliable basis for inclusive dialogue with the parties concerned.

      Addressing the threats and the security situation: Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach. It welcomed the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, whether in the form of military strikes or through logistical, financial and humanitarian participation. However, it called for increased mobilisation in all spheres, with better-articulated actions, which could be coordinated as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation. To this end, Parliament called on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence. Parliament deplored the fact that CSDP operations deployed (EUBAM Libya, EUPOL COPPS and EUBAM Rafah) were too small and out of step with the security challenges in the region, and called for a strategic reassessment of these deployments.

      At the same time, Parliament stressed that a tailored response must be found, based on political and cross-regional differences, to the issue of combating ISIL/Da’esh, and the al-Nusra Front. It called on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the League of Arab States (LAS), Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, and address the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011. The EU must put in place a genuine common foreign policy. The VP/HR must work with EU foreign ministers to ensure a constant high-level dialogue with the countries of the region.

      Parliament stressed the importance of regional dialogues with Turkey and Iran. Welcoming the recent agreement reached by the EU3+3 and Iran on the latter's nuclear programme, it called on the VP/HR and the Member States, in the event of a final agreement on the nuclear issue, to engage in promoting confidence-building measures between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Turkey could play a major role, as a member of NATO, in the fight against ISIL/Da’esh and in stabilising Iraq and Syria. Parliament called on Turkey to clear away certain ambiguities and take a more active part in combating Da’esh/ISIL in cooperation with the EU.

      Members went on to stress the following:

      • the EU and the Arab world must assess the root causes of radicalisation and adopt a global approach, whereby inclusivity should be a guiding principle. Unless a practical, sustainable solution is found, any action to neutralise the threat posed by ISIL/Da’esh and other terrorist groups would encounter increased and persistent difficulties;
      • the attempts to tailor EU humanitarian assistance to gender- and age-specific needs was welcomed. Members noted the allocation of EUR 1 billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat', under which EUR 400 million had been earmarked for humanitarian aid;
      • all EU Member States must increase their commitments in relation to the refugee crisis in terms of financial resources and resettlement of the most vulnerable refugees in the region, and special attention must be given to Jordan and Lebanon, which were absorbing the biggest share of refugees in proportion to their population;
      • Member States should step up their efforts in hosting asylum seekers from Syria and Iraq and in swiftly addressing the build-up of pending cases;
      • Member States should pool their resources, enhance the existing mechanisms (Frontex, Eurosur) and establish a European PNR in order to improve controls at the EU’s external borders;
      • conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority should be put in place for a definitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security, based on the 1967 borders and with Jerusalem as capital of both states.

      Stepping up the global strategy for democracy and human rights: Parliament convinced that the lack of democracy was one of the fundamental causes of political instability in the region. It stressed the need to enhance long-term stability in the MENA region through continuing EU support to civil society, notably though the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the ENI Civil Society Facility, as well as through new pro-democracy tools such as the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). Member States were called on to provide the Endowment's budget with sufficient funding.

      Whilst welcoming the broad consultation on ENP revision, Parliament stressed the importance of preserving the current balance of distribution of funds for the allocation of ENP funding. Countries making progress in implementing reforms should be granted decisive additional support, with particular attention to Tunisia.

      Members called for a special programme for the support and rehabilitation of women and girls who were victims of sexual violence and slavery in conflict areas in the MENA region, especially Syria and Iraq.

      They went on to stress the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda and to home-grown radicalisation. This counter-narrative should be based on the promotion of common values founded on the universality of human rights and should discredit the idea of a conflict between religions or civilisations. Parliament wanted EEAS to appoint staff speaking the languages of the MENA region to increase the effectiveness of communication.

      It also highlighted the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), and reiterated the importance of revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and reviving its political ambition.

      Strengthening cooperation for economic development: Parliament took the view that strategic dialogue between the EU and the MENA countries should help to iron out inequalities and creating job and education opportunities, mainly for young people. It stressed the need to facilitate access to the EU single market for the MENA countries, while providing all necessary protection, as well as to encourage European investments

      Noting that the upheavals could jeopardise the EU's energy security, Parliament suggested that the EU engage more strongly in energy diplomacy in the MENA region, as outlined in the Energy Union. Supplying energy to countries in the EUʼs southern neighbourhood was important both strategically and in economic terms.

      Parliament regretted that a minimum one-year period was necessary for the release of macro-financial assistance to countries in a very precarious financial situation and urged the deployment of a new procedural dimension for EU aid, both in regard to aid through EU external action financial instruments and at macro-financial assistance level. In addition, the EU must adequately assess the socio-economic and human rights impact of the measures requested from beneficiary countries in order to ensure that such assistance does not constitute a factor of instability, for example by undermining welfare services.

      Lastly, Parliament called on the MENA countries to diversify their economies and imports, noting that the great majority of the MENA countries’ trade was with non-MENA countries. It regretted the deadlock faced by the EU with regard to the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), and called for the regional integration of the Maghreb countries.

    activities/4
    date
    2015-07-09T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0271 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0271/2015
    body
    EP
    type
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/4
    date
    2015-07-09T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150708&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Vote scheduled
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate scheduled
    activities/3
    date
    2015-07-08T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/3/date
    Old
    2015-07-06T00:00:00
    New
    2015-07-09T00:00:00
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0193&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0193/2015
    activities/2
    date
    2015-06-18T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/1
    date
    2015-06-11T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2015-06-08T00:00:00
    New
    2015-07-06T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole
    procedure/subject/1
    Old
    6.40.05.02 Relations with the countries of the Great Maghreb and Maghreb
    New
    6.40.05.06 Relations with the countries of the Middle East
    activities/0/committees/1
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    FEMM
    date
    2015-02-10T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
    rapporteur
    group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
    activities/1
    date
    2015-06-08T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    committees/1
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    FEMM
    date
    2015-02-10T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
    rapporteur
    group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
    activities
    • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PEILLON Vincent
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: PEILLON Vincent
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/02276
      reference
      2014/2229(INI)
      title
      Security challenges in the MENA region and prospects for political stability
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject