Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | GRZYB Andrzej ( PPE) | MARTIN David ( S&D), DEMESMAEKER Mark ( ECR), MICHEL Louis ( ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE), CORRAO Ignazio ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 395 votes to 86, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment.
Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Parliament welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition.
General evaluation : Parliament welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries.
Financing : Parliament called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. It stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding.
Parliament welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada and called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or projects .
Grants and beneficiaries : whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Parliament considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries.
To this end, the Commission is invited to:
set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support; come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS).
Further, it called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered.
They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors, which set a good example of swift support for political and civic activists who then become democratically elected representatives. It welcomed the EED support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood, which is intended to sustain the development of consolidated democratic regimes.
Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists). They recalled that the church has played a crucial role in opposing communist regimes and in the democratic transformation processes in central and eastern Europe.
Cooperation with the European Parliament : Parliament called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. It called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network.
Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Parliament called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries.
Plenary called for the composition of the EED Board of Governors to represent political groups, on the basis of the D’Hondt system.
Lastly, Parliament considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.
It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution, tabled by the GUE/NGL Group, was rejected in plenary.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Andrzej GRZYB (EPP, PL) on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment.
Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Members welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition.
General evaluation : Members welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries.
Financing : Members called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. They stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding.
Members welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada.
Members also called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or project
Grants and beneficiaries : whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Members considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries.
To this end, Members invited the Commission to:
set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support; come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS).
Further, they called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered.
They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors and the support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood.
Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists).
Cooperation with the European Parliament : Members called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. They called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network.
Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Members called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries.
Lastly, Members considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0274/2015
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0177/2015
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE552.133
- Committee draft report: PE544.402
- Committee draft report: PE544.402
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE552.133
Activities
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) (A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb) HU
- 2016/11/22 Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) (short presentation) HU
- 2016/11/22 Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) (short presentation) HU
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Notis MARIAS
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andi CRISTEA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mark DEMESMAEKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian DUNCAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GODDYN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrzej GRZYB
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo IGLESIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gabrielius LANDSBERGIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steven WOOLFE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb - § 25/1 #
DE | PL | RO | GB | NL | ES | BE | BG | FR | CZ | SE | FI | DK | SK | HU | AT | LT | PT | HR | LV | LU | EE | MT | SI | IE | ?? | IT | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
66
|
35
|
25
|
42
|
22
|
30
|
17
|
12
|
56
|
20
|
12
|
11
|
9
|
9
|
12
|
14
|
7
|
13
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
1
|
43
|
4
|
|
PPE |
137
|
Germany PPEFor (24)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Christian EHLER, David MCALLISTER, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Herbert REUL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Manfred WEBER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN
|
Poland PPEFor (15) |
10
|
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
2
|
4
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (7) |
France PPEFor (16)Against (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Italy PPEFor (7) |
1
|
||||
S&D |
131
|
Germany S&DFor (21)Arne LIETZ, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (18) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (13)Against (3) |
|||||||
ALDE |
54
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
Belgium ALDE |
4
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||
ECR |
43
|
4
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (8)Against (1) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
37
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (5) |
2
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
NI |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
26
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (8) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
28
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
France ENFAgainst (17)
Aymeric CHAUPRADE,
Bernard MONOT,
Dominique BILDE,
Dominique MARTIN,
Florian PHILIPPOT,
Jean-François JALKH,
Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER,
Joëlle MÉLIN,
Louis ALIOT,
Marie-Christine ARNAUTU,
Marie-Christine BOUTONNET,
Marine LE PEN,
Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI,
Nicolas BAY,
Sophie MONTEL,
Steeve BRIOIS,
Sylvie GODDYN
|
3
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
37
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (7) |
1
|
2
|
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (8) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb - résolution de la commission AFET #
DE | PL | GB | RO | BE | FR | NL | ES | BG | CZ | AT | SE | FI | LT | HU | PT | HR | SK | LU | DK | LV | EE | IT | MT | SI | IE | ?? | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
67
|
35
|
43
|
24
|
17
|
58
|
22
|
28
|
12
|
20
|
15
|
12
|
11
|
8
|
12
|
13
|
7
|
8
|
5
|
9
|
7
|
4
|
43
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
1
|
4
|
|
PPE |
136
|
Germany PPEFor (24)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Herbert REUL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Manfred WEBER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN
|
14
|
4
|
France PPEFor (17) |
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
2
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (7) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
5
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
Italy PPEFor (7) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|||||
S&D |
129
|
Germany S&DFor (21)Arne LIETZ, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
16
|
2
|
||||||||
ALDE |
53
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium ALDE |
4
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||
ECR |
46
|
4
|
Poland ECRFor (15) |
United Kingdom ECRFor (10)Abstain (1) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
37
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (5) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||
NI |
5
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
28
|
2
|
1
|
France ENFAgainst (15)Abstain (2) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
26
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (8) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
38
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (8) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (7) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
Amendments | Dossier |
104 |
2014/2231(INI)
2015/04/16
AFET
104 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 – having regard to its resolution of 1
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas a number of EU Member States have undergone a process of democratic transformation
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the EED to continue to develop new innovative means for democracy assistance in order to adjust to the growing climate of restriction in a number of countries with authoritarian regimes; underlines the importance in this context of developing country-specific strategies;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Calls on the EED, in the name of its democratic spirit, to have in the composition of its Board of Governors a full representation of all political groups of the European Parliament, based on the D' Hondt system, and ensure at least one seat for each political group;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Welcomes the
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Welcomes the very good public
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Welcomes the very good public outreach on the EED’s achievements so far, and considers that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED would increase its fundraising capacity; takes the view that the EED should engage with and support the emergence and consolidation of political parties with clear commitment to democratic principles, whenever possible in partnership with existing political foundations;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the events of the Arab Spring and in the Eastern Neighbourhood triggered a reshaping of the EU's policy instruments for promoting human right and democracy support;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas in a number of countries around the world, notably in the EU's immediate neighbourhood, the space for legitimate civil society action is shrinking and authoritarian regimes are using increasingly sophisticated means to restrict the work of NGOs and pro- democratic actors whilst feigning a veneer of democratic appearance;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas there is growing concern regarding restrictive legislation regulating the external funding of civil society organisations in some of the countries
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas countries of the EU neighbourhood faced during the last years a significant number of political, security and economic challenges that seriously put under pressure democratization efforts and the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is a need to promote objective and independent information and strengthen the media environment, including the internet and social media, in countries
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is a need to promote objective and independent information and strengthen the media environment, including the internet and social media, in countries falling under the EED’s geographical mandate, by protecting freedom of the press and opinion and by combating all forms of social and political censorship;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is a need to promote objective and independent information and strengthen the media environment, including the internet and social media, in countries falling under the EED’s geographical mandate; whereas there is equally a need in those countries to support the democratization efforts, including the consolidation of rule of law, fight against corruption and respect for freedom of expression;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the establishment of the EED
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 a (new) – having regard to the Joint Consultation Paper by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission "Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy" from 4 March 2015,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the establishment of the EED should be seen as a sign of a new trend in EU neighbourhood policy that
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the establishment of the EED should be seen as a sign of a new trend in EU neighbourhood policy that shifts the paradigm from a traditional state-centred approach to a more balanced and long-term oriented, society-centred perspective, with a focus on direct engagement with grassroots movements and democratic political actors;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the establishment of the EED should be seen as a sign of a new trend in EU neighbourhood policy that shifts the paradigm from a traditional state-centred approach to a more balanced and long-term oriented, society-centred perspective, with a focus on direct engagement with local and regional grassroots movements;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the assessment of the impact of democracy assistance activity, such as that carried out by the EED, remains an inherently difficult task, notably due to the non-linear and long-term nature of political transformation in the countries concerned and to the often confidential nature of the activities involved;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas new information technologies and social media have become important instruments in the struggle for democracy and should therefore have a prominent place within the European democracy assistance agenda;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas as of 1
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas as of 1 February 2015 the following Board of Governors Member States have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland, while the remaining 14 have not done so yet, which fails to send a positive political signal and could be interpreted as a de facto refusal by those 14 Member States to participate actively in the EDD’s work and as evidencing a lack of political support for its objectives and tasks;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas as of 1 February 2015 the following Board of Governors Member States have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland, while the remaining 1
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the track record of the EED to date given the current challenging international environment, and considers that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transitions and in societies struggling for democratisation’15,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores the fact that the findings of previous internal evaluations have not been published and that the EED’s track record is, therefore, difficult to assess objectively; calls on the EED to publish the findings and recommendations of internal and external evaluations, in keeping with the principle of full transparency and in order to make an objective assessment of its work possible;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new) – having regard to the Joint Communication by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission "A New Response to a Changing Neighbourhood. A review of European Neighbourhood Policy" from 25 May 2011,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges with satisfaction that despite the short time of activity and limited funds
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges with satisfaction that despite the short time of activity and limited funds, the EED has met Parliament’s recommendations, delivering added value to existing EU democracy support through faster, flexible, bottom-up and demand-driven funding
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges with satisfaction that despite the short time of activity and limited funds, the EED has met Parliament’s recommendations, delivering added value to existing EU democracy support through fast
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out how important it is, given the large number of international donors funding civil society organisations, in particular in the countries of the Arab Spring, that through its activities the EED should seek to close funding gaps left by other donors, in order to generate real value added for local organisations and establish itself as a reliable partner;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the EED as a democracy support modality has
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the complementarity of EED activities and existing EU external financial instruments, especially the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI);
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the complementarity of EED activities and existing EU external financial instruments, as they both aim to promote democratic principles and respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms in EU's proximity;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes EED's consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, freedom of media, building and reinforcing rule of law, fight against corruption, social and political pluralism, meant to support the development of democratic regimes both in the Eastern and the Southern EU Neighbourhood;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets that the EU's global approach to democracy support remains fragmented and largely disconnected from its human rights policy; calls on the EU and the Member States to develop a holistic approach to support political transition and democratisation in third countries, which comprises respect for human rights, the promotion of justice, transparency, accountability, reconciliation, the rule of law and the strengthening of democratic institutions, including legislative bodies;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EED founding parties, especially on all EU Member States
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EED founding parties, especially on all EU Member States and the European Commission, to fulfil the obligations to which they committed themselves when establishing the EED;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EED founding parties, especially on all EU Member States, to
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EED founding parties, especially on all EU Member States, to fulfil the financial obligations to which they committed themselves when establishing the EED; also strongly urges the Board to reconsider supporting democratic political activists and providing funding to inclusive political processes;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Reminds that 12 EU Member States are not respecting their funding commitments towards EED and urges these 12 countries to do so by the end of 2015;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that in order to sustain and further develop EED effectiveness it is vital to ensure
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that in order to sustain and further develop EED effectiveness it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that in order to sustain and further develop EED effectiveness it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable and predictable funding; recalls its recommendation of 29 March 2012, where it stressed that EU budget contributions to the EED should not be at the expense of the already limited resources of the EIDHR;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on Belgium to at least assess the possibility of returning tax revenues received from the EED and its employees in the form of funding for EED projects; recalls that the EED is functioning as a private foundation under Belgian law;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the advancement of democracy and human rights is among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Treaty of the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on Belgium to assess the possibility of returning some or all of the tax revenues received from the EED and its employees in the form of funding for EED projects; recalls that the EED is functioning as a private foundation under Belgian law;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on all EED contributors to enable the EED to maintain a lean administrative structure with low operational costs, especially through harmonizing their donor requirements and agreeing to a single reporting framework; regrets that certain donors, including Germany, are imposing excessively cumbersome and intrusive requirements; calls on all EED donors to ensure full autonomy of the EED Executive Committee in the selection of beneficiaries on the basis of the work- plan endorsed by the Board of Governors and calls for an end to earmarking by donors of funds for particular countries or projects;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Welcomes the scope the EED has to support projects directly by meeting operating costs; warns, however, that the impartiality requirement must be observed at all times;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the EED also to support beneficiaries in countries with a rather consolidated democratic regime yet where certain groups, such as ethnic minorities, are being politically marginalized or excluded;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers it crucial to
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B.
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – point 1 (new) (1) invites the EED and the European Commission to set up a contact group with the goal of identifying best ways for EED beneficiaries to transition to the EIDHR financial support;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the European Commission and the EEAS to come forward with specific proposals on mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED, so as to ensure coherence and sustainability in the longer term;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered, since the main reason for the establishment of the EED was to support the unsupported; supports the efforts of the EED to explore innovative means for supporting agents for change in particularly difficult political environments, including in Egypt, Azerbaijan and Algeria, as well as to enhance its support to civil society in regions afflicted by frozen conflicts;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered or where financing is discriminatory and awarded solely to certain organisations or civil societies, since the main reason for the establishment of the EED was to support the unsupported;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors, as they set a good example of the swift support for political and civic activists who then become democratically elected representatives; welcomes the EED support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the Eastern EU Neighbourhood, seeking in this way to sustain the development of consolidated democratic regimes;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors, as they set a good example of the swift support for political and civic activists who then become democratically elected representatives; calls for a broader scope and non-discriminatory approach as regards the issuing of EED grants to Ukrainian actors;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the EED grants offered to activists in some of the Southern Neighbourhood countries, since they
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the EED grants offered to activists in some of the Southern Neighbourhood countries, since they demonstrate the added value of EED pro- democracy work in particularly
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Strongly encourages the EED to place a stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Strongly encourages the EED to place a stronger emphasis on socially excluded groups by supporting, among others, women’s movements to further women's rights and
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Strongly encourages the EED to place a stronger emphasis on socially excluded groups by supporting, among others, women’s rights and women’s increased public participation, ethnic and linguistic minorities as well as grassroots movements and media activists;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Strongly encourages the EED to place a stronger emphasis on socially excluded groups by supporting, among others, women’s rights and women’s increased public participation, as well as
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Strongly encourages the EED to place a stronger emphasis on socially excluded groups by supporting, among others, women’s rights and women’s increased public participation, LGBTI organisations, as well as grassroots movements and media activists;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the EED to develop
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the EED to develop better cooperation with and open its grants to religious communities, including persecuted religious minorities;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas a number of EU Member States have undergone a process of democratic transformation since the end of the Cold
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the EED to develop better cooperation with and open its grants to civic activism related to religious communities, including
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Encourages the EED to step up its support to emerging young leaders and newly elected women, youth or minority representatives in countries in political transition;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Member States to pursue with the financial assistance to the Russian civil society and media through the European Endowment for Democracy; points out that recent developments such as the restrictions imposed on civil society organisations, the repression of the political opposition and aggressive targeted disinformation campaigns by state-controlled media seem to serve the purpose of deliberately building up breeding grounds for an extremely nationalistic political climate marked by anti-democratic rhetoric, repression and hate speech;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Welcomes the first presentation of the EED Annual Report in the Committee on Foreign Affairs, in accordance with Article 8.4 of the EED Statute
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Welcomes the first presentation of the EED Annual Report in the Committee on Foreign Affairs, in accordance with Article 8.4 of the EED Statute, and stresses its openness for this to take
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Encourages both Member States and EU institutions to ensure genuine internal and external coherence related to democracy efforts and to recognise the
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Encourages both Member States and EU institutions to ensure genuine internal and external coherence related to democracy efforts and to recognise the facilitating role of the EED so as to avoid duplication of efforts with European Union instruments that also have the aim of promoting democracy and human rights, like the EIDHR;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Encourages the EU delegations and Member States’ diplomatic missions in the countries where the EED is active to bring potential beneficiaries to the EED’s attention and to inform them about the EED; in turn, encourages EED staff to liaise closely with relevant EU and Member States diplomatic staff in relation to potential beneficiaries which cannot be supported by the EED;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Encourages the EU delegations and Member States’ diplomatic missions in the countries where the EED is active, to bring to the EED's attention potential beneficiaries
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Encourages the EEAS
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas a large number of EU Member States have
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Calls for a triennial meeting of the EED Board of Governors at ministerial level to reflect on the EU's democracy support policy and on future EED strategic priorities;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Calls on the EED to continue cooperating with
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Calls on the EED to foster cooperation with key actors and international and regional organisations active in the field of democracy assistance, both inside the European Union and those active in the target countries;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Calls on the EED to foster cooperation with key actors and international and regional organisations active in the field of democracy assistance; stresses also the importance of close cooperation with democracy assistance organizations and foundations from EU Member States;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Encourages the EED to identify possible avenues of cooperation with international civil society organisations
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the EED to continue to develop new innovative means for democracy assistance, including to political actors or activists, in order to adjust to the growing climate of restriction in a number of countries with authoritarian regimes;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the EED to continue to develop new innovative
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the EED to continue to develop new innovative means for democracy assistance and to share best practices in order to adjust to the growing climate of restriction in a number of countries with authoritarian regimes;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the EED to continue to develop new innovative means for democracy assistance in order to adjust to the growing climate of restriction in a number of countries with authoritarian regimes, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries;
source: 552.133
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE544.402New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-544402_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE552.133New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-552133_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0177&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0177_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0274New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0274_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/8/02278New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/3/date |
Old
2015-07-06T00:00:00New
2015-07-09T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|