BETA


2014/2231(INI) EU's new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET GRZYB Andrzej (icon: PPE PPE) MARTIN David (icon: S&D S&D), DEMESMAEKER Mark (icon: ECR ECR), MICHEL Louis (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CORRAO Ignazio (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2015/07/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/07/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 395 votes to 86, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment.

Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Parliament welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition.

General evaluation : Parliament welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries.

Financing : Parliament called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. It stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding.

Parliament welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada and called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or projects .

Grants and beneficiaries : whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Parliament considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries.

To this end, the Commission is invited to:

set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support; come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS).

Further, it called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered.

They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors, which set a good example of swift support for political and civic activists who then become democratically elected representatives. It welcomed the EED support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood, which is intended to sustain the development of consolidated democratic regimes.

Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists). They recalled that the church has played a crucial role in opposing communist regimes and in the democratic transformation processes in central and eastern Europe.

Cooperation with the European Parliament : Parliament called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. It called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network.

Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Parliament called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries.

Plenary called for the composition of the EED Board of Governors to represent political groups, on the basis of the D’Hondt system.

Lastly, Parliament considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.

It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution, tabled by the GUE/NGL Group, was rejected in plenary.

Documents
2015/07/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/06/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Andrzej GRZYB (EPP, PL) on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment.

Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Members welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition.

General evaluation : Members welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries.

Financing : Members called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. They stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding.

Members welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada.

Members also called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or project

Grants and beneficiaries : whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Members considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries.

To this end, Members invited the Commission to:

set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support; come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS).

Further, they called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered.

They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors and the support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood.

Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists).

Cooperation with the European Parliament : Members called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. They called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network.

Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Members called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries.

Lastly, Members considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.

Documents
2015/05/26
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/04/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/02/25
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/11/27
   EP - GRZYB Andrzej (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb - § 25/1 #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 395, -: 94, 0: 9
DE PL RO GB NL ES BE BG FR CZ SE FI DK SK HU AT LT PT HR LV LU EE MT SI IE ?? IT EL
Total
66
35
25
42
22
30
17
12
56
20
12
11
9
9
12
14
7
13
7
7
4
4
4
4
7
1
43
4
icon: PPE PPE
137

Sweden PPE

For (1)

1
2

Portugal PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

2

Ireland PPE

2

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
131

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
54

Germany ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
3

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
4

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
28

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb - résolution de la commission AFET #

2015/07/09 Outcome: +: 395, -: 86, 0: 18
DE PL GB RO BE FR NL ES BG CZ AT SE FI LT HU PT HR SK LU DK LV EE IT MT SI IE ?? EL
Total
67
35
43
24
17
58
22
28
12
20
15
12
11
8
12
13
7
8
5
9
7
4
43
3
3
7
1
4
icon: PPE PPE
136

Sweden PPE

For (1)

1
2

Portugal PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

2

Ireland PPE

2

Greece PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
129

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
53

Germany ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2
3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
46

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
5

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Greece NI

1
icon: ENF ENF
28

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Austria ENF

3

Italy ENF

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
38

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Greece GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
104 2014/2231(INI)
2015/04/16 AFET 104 amendments...
source: 552.133

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
COUSO PERMUY Javier
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE544.402
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-544402_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE552.133
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-552133_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-06-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0177_EN.html title: A8-0177/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-06-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0177_EN.html title: A8-0177/2015
summary
events/4
date
2015-07-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0274_EN.html title: T8-0274/2015
summary
events/4
date
2015-07-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0274_EN.html title: T8-0274/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: GRZYB Andrzej date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-11-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRZYB Andrzej group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0177&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0177_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0274
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0274_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: ALDE name: MICHEL Louis group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRZYB Andrzej
  • date: 2015-05-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: ALDE name: MICHEL Louis group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRZYB Andrzej
  • date: 2015-06-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0177&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0177/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0274 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0274/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-11-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRZYB Andrzej group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2014-11-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: GRZYB Andrzej
docs
  • date: 2015-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE544.402 title: PE544.402 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE552.133 title: PE552.133 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-03T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0177&language=EN title: A8-0177/2015 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Andrzej GRZYB (EPP, PL) on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment. Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Members welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition. General evaluation : Members welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries. Financing : Members called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. They stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding. Members welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada. Members also called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or project Grants and beneficiaries : whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Members considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries. To this end, Members invited the Commission to: set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support; come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS). Further, they called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered. They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors and the support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood. Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists). Cooperation with the European Parliament : Members called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. They called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network. Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Members called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries. Lastly, Members considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25826&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0274 title: T8-0274/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 395 votes to 86, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment. Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Parliament welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition. General evaluation : Parliament welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries. Financing : Parliament called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. It stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding. Parliament welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada and called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or projects . Grants and beneficiaries : whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Parliament considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries. To this end, the Commission is invited to: set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support; come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS). Further, it called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered. They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors, which set a good example of swift support for political and civic activists who then become democratically elected representatives. It welcomed the EED support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood, which is intended to sustain the development of consolidated democratic regimes. Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists). They recalled that the church has played a crucial role in opposing communist regimes and in the democratic transformation processes in central and eastern Europe. Cooperation with the European Parliament : Parliament called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. It called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network. Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Parliament called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries. Plenary called for the composition of the EED Board of Governors to represent political groups, on the basis of the D’Hondt system. Lastly, Parliament considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity. It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution, tabled by the GUE/NGL Group, was rejected in plenary.
  • date: 2015-07-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 159
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/02278
    New
    • AFET/8/02278
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general
    New
    6.10.08
    Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Andrzej GRZYB (EPP, PL) on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment.

      Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Members welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition.

      General evaluation: Members welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries.

      Financing: Members called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. They stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding.

      Members welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada.

      Members also called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or project

      Grants and beneficiaries: whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Members considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries.

      To this end, Members invited the Commission to:

      • set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support;
      • come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS).

      Further, they called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered.

      They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors and the support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood.

      Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists).

      Cooperation with the European Parliament: Members called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. They called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network.

      Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Members called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries.

      Lastly, Members considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.

    activities/3/docs/0/text
    • The European Parliament adopted by 395 votes to 86, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment.

      Recalling that the promotion of and support for democracy, the rule of law and respect for the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms are among the core objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, Parliament welcomed the EED’s track record to date and considered that it is fulfilling its main objective of ‘fostering and encouraging democratisation and deep and sustainable democracy in countries in political transition.

      General evaluation: Parliament welcomed the EED’s consistent engagement in favour of freedom of expression and association, the strengthening of the rule of law, the fight against corruption, and social and political pluralism to support the development of democratic regimes in both the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods. The initiatives taken by the EED have demonstrated its unique capacity to bridge or fill gaps in cases where it has been impossible to obtain financing from EU Member States or non-EU countries.

      Financing: Parliament called on the EED founding parties, and especially on all the Member States and the Commission, to contribute, or increase their contributions, to the EED in line with the commitments they have made. As at 26 April 2015, the following countries have pledged and contributed to the EED: Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. It stressed that, in order to sustain and further develop the effectiveness of the EED, it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding.

      Parliament welcomed the financial contributions received by the EED from EU partners such as Switzerland and Canada and called for an end to earmarking of funds by donors for particular countries or projects.

      Grants and beneficiaries: whilst welcoming the lifting of the initial geographical limitation of the EED, Parliament considered it crucial to ensure sustainable funding for EED recipients in the long run by strengthening complementarity links with other bilateral donors and with European external financing instruments, in particular the EIDHR, which – where appropriate – could take over medium-term financial support for ‘mature’ EED beneficiaries.

      To this end, the Commission is invited to:

      • set up a contact group with the goal of identifying the best way for EED beneficiaries to transition to EIDHR financial support;
      • come forward with specific proposals for mechanisms for programming interface and cooperation with the EED (in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS).

      Further, it called on the EED to further actively engage in countries where the space for external support for civil society is severely hampered.

      They welcomed the EED grants offered to Ukrainian actors, which set a good example of swift support for political and civic activists who then become democratically elected representatives. It welcomed the EED support offered to all pro-democracy activists engaged in the EU’s neighbourhood, which is intended to sustain the development of consolidated democratic regimes.

      Members encouraged the EED to place stronger emphasis on groups suffering from social exclusion or political marginalisation (e.g. women’s movements LGBTI human rights activists, persecuted religious minorities and civic activists). They recalled that the church has played a crucial role in opposing communist regimes and in the democratic transformation processes in central and eastern Europe.

      Cooperation with the European Parliament: Parliament called for effective links between the EED, the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and the relevant parliamentary committees. It called for the development of further cooperation between the EED, its beneficiaries and the Sakharov Prize Network.

      Whilst calling for enhanced policy coherence of actions financed by the EED, Parliament called for EED to continue to develop new innovative means and instruments for democracy assistance, with particular regard to new media and grassroots initiatives in these countries.

      Plenary called for the composition of the EED Board of Governors to represent political groups, on the basis of the D’Hondt system.

      Lastly, Parliament considered that further underlining the uniqueness and added value of the EED and communicating about the subject widely and on a regular basis would increase the EED’s fundraising capacity.

      It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution, tabled by the GUE/NGL Group, was rejected in plenary.

    activities/3
    date
    2015-07-09T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0274 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0274/2015
    body
    EP
    type
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/3
    date
    2015-07-09T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate scheduled
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate scheduled
    activities/3/date
    Old
    2015-07-06T00:00:00
    New
    2015-07-09T00:00:00
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0177&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0177/2015
    activities/2
    date
    2015-06-03T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/1
    date
    2015-05-26T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: ALDE name: MICHEL Louis group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRZYB Andrzej
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/5
    group
    EFD
    name
    CORRAO Ignazio
    committees/0/shadows/5
    group
    EFD
    name
    CORRAO Ignazio
    activities/1
    date
    2015-07-06T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities
    • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: ALDE name: MICHEL Louis group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRZYB Andrzej
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: ALDE name: MICHEL Louis group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRZYB Andrzej
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/02278
      reference
      2014/2231(INI)
      title
      EU's new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general