BETA


2014/2236(INI) Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combatting unemployment

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead EMPL LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica (icon: PPE PPE) BENIFEI Brando (icon: S&D S&D), KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław (icon: ECR ECR), HARKIN Marian (icon: ALDE ALDE), DELLI Karima (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), AGEA Laura (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/02/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/09/10
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/09/10
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 494 votes to 91 with 23 abstentions, a resolution on Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in combating unemployment.

Parliament recalled that the social and solidarity-based economy provided employment for more than 14 million people , representing around 6.5% of workers in the EU and that there were 2 million social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in the EU, representing 10% of undertakings in the Union.

Definition of social economy enterprises : Parliament noted that that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which did not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations , were enterprises whose purpose was to achieve their social goal , which might be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services for their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvested their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives.

The social and solidarity-based economy enterprises were characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values:

the primacy of individual and social goals over the interests of capital; democratic governance by members; the conjunction of the interests of members and users with the general interest; the safeguarding and application of the principles of solidarity and responsibility; the reinvestment of surplus funds in long-term development objectives, or in the provision of services of interest to members or of services of general interest; voluntary and open membership; autonomous management independent of the public authorities.

In this context, Members considered that the Commission should:

recognise the diversity of social enterprises and ensure that actions are taken at EU level to support social and solidarity-based enterprises of all types; implement all the measures set out in the 2012 Social Business Initiative so as to broaden and deepen its scope to the key players in the social and solidarity-based economy; recognise and support the role of not-for-profit social service providers, both politically and financially.

Parliament noted that the social and solidarity-based economy cannot replace the welfare state and public services . It welcomed the fact that four EU Member States (Spain, France, Portugal and Belgium) have national legislation concerning the social and solidarity-based economy, while Poland has launched a strategy to develop the social and solidarity-based economy and Romania is discussing the adoption of legislation to regulate the social and solidarity-based economy.

Europe 2020 strategy : Parliament recognised that the EU remains far from achieving the targets set in the Europe 2020 strategy, particularly those relating to employment, innovation and the reduction of poverty and social exclusion. It emphasised that, given its social and inclusive nature, the social and solidarity-based economy offers jobs to the groups most often excluded from the open labour market . It called therefore on Member States to better integrate social and solidarity-based economy enterprises into action plans for employment and social integration. It welcomed the fact that the pre-financing budget for the Youth Employment Initiative had been increased to 30 %. Parliament called on the Commission and Member States to encourage social entrepreneurship and innovation in the ESF's national Operational Programmes and urged that the Youth Guarantee schemes be implemented effectively.

Public procurement : Parliament pointed out that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises face difficulties in accessing public procurement, such as barriers related to size and financial capability. It calls for the swift and effective implementation of the new public procurement and concession directives (Directives 2014/24/EU , 2014/25/EU and 2014/23/EU ) in order to achieve greater participation by social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in tendering procedures for public contracts. Member States were also called on to implement these procurement principles properly in all tendering and selection procedures, with wide use of the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT), in compliance with environmental, social and labour law obligations.

Parliament welcomed the reform of the public procurement and concession directives, which includes social clauses and criteria in order to promote social inclusion and social innovation and contracts earmarked to foster the employment of the most disadvantaged people on the labour market.

It regretted that the Commission Digital Single Market strategy for Europe fails to mention social and solidarity-based economy enterprises and their potential contribution to the achievement of the Union's goals.

Financing : Parliament regretted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises encounter even more difficulties than traditional enterprises in securing financing, whether through public or private channels. It therefore called for public authorities and financial service providers to develop a wide range of appropriate financial instruments. It also called on the Commission to review the ceiling for loans to social enterprises laid down under EaSI, and to determine whether this reflects market conditions.

Parliament welcomed the fact that part of the funding for the EaSI programme is earmarked to help provide access to finance for social and solidarity-based economy enterprises. It called on the Member States to establish national contact points or one-stop shops to help social and solidarity-based economy actors access the EU´s funding schemes.

In general, Parliament highlighted the need to support social and solidarity-based economy enterprises with sufficient financial resources at local, regional, national and EU level, creating synergies among the various types of enterprises. It considered it necessary, therefore, to improve access to financing for the social and solidarity-based economy by various means, such as European funds, risk capital funds, microcredit and crowdfunding.

It called on the Commission to propose a new exception to the legal definition of ‘SME’, similar to those which already apply to public investment corporations, venture capital firms and non-profit-making universities and research centres, so that a training and placement enterprise can be classified as an autonomous enterprise , even if another enterprise holds, alone or jointly with other enterprises, more than 25% of its capital or of the voting rights on its administrative board.

Parliament pointed out that the state aid rules should not constitute an impediment for public funding to social and solidarity-based economy enterprises and social services.

Training: Parliament pointed out that the social and solidarity-based economy could help considerably to reduce youth unemployment in the EU. It called on the Member States to develop training programmes targeted on and specifically tailored to entrepreneurs in the social sector, with particular reference to groups with lower employment rates such as women, young or disadvantaged workers. It pointed out that sectors with a wide margin for growth and job creation, such as the ‘white’ and ‘green’ sectors, are those in which the social and solidarity-based economy is very much present. It urged the Member States, accordingly, to promote education and training in those sectors.

Support and promotion : Parliament deeply regretted the low level of recognition of the social and solidarity-based economy at European level. It was in favour of creating a multilingual digital platform for exchanging information aimed at social enterprises, business incubators, business clusters and investors in social enterprises.

It called on the Commission to:

carry out a comparative analysis of national certification and labelling systems for the social and solidarity-based economy; promote the creation of business incubators for social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, and to implement and effectively promote the internet platform for data exchange between social investors and social entrepreneurs (the Social Innovation Europe Platform), details of which have been agreed on.

Parliament equally supported the idea that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises could form a specific company category with its own legal status , defined as having other objectives than simply profit for shareholders.

Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to come forward with a legal framework for such enterprises, to be achieved by means of the European statute for cooperative societies, associations, foundations and mutual societies.

Documents
2015/09/10
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/09/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/07/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted a report by Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ (EPP, ES) on Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in combating unemployment.

Members recalled that the social and solidarity-based economy provides employment for more than 14 million people , representing around 6.5% of workers in the EU and that there are 2 million social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in the EU, representing 10% of undertakings in the Union .

Definition of social economy enterprises : Members noted that that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which do not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations , are enterprises whose purpose is to achieve their social goal , which may be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services for their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvest their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives .

The social and solidarity-based economy enterprises are characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values:

the primacy of individual and social goals over the interests of capital; democratic governance by members ; the conjunction of the interests of members and users with the general interest; the safeguarding and application of the principles of solidarity and responsibility; the reinvestment of surplus funds in long-term development objectives, or in the provision of services of interest to members or of services of general interest; voluntary and open membership; autonomous management independent of the public authorities.

In this context, Members considered that the Commission should:

recognise the diversity of social enterprises and ensure that actions are taken at EU level to support social and solidarity-based enterprises of all types; implement all the measures set out in the 2012 Social Business Initiative so as to broaden and deepen its scope to the key players in the social and solidarity-based economy; recognise and support the role of not-for-profit social service providers, both politically and financially.

Members noted that the social and solidarity-based economy cannot replace the welfare state and public services . They welcomed the fact that four EU Member States (Spain, France, Portugal and Belgium) have national legislation concerning the social and solidarity-based economy, while Poland has launched a strategy to develop the social and solidarity-based economy and Romania is discussing the adoption of legislation to regulate the social and solidarity-based economy.

Europe 2020 strategy : Members recognised that the EU remains far from achieving the targets set in the Europe 2020 strategy, particularly those relating to employment, innovation and the reduction of poverty and social exclusion. They emphasised that, given its social and inclusive nature, the social and solidarity-based economy offers jobs to the groups most often excluded from the open labour market . They called therefore on the Member States to better integrate social and solidarity-based economy enterprises into action plans for employment and social integration.

Public procurement : Members pointed out that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises face difficulties in accessing public procurement, such as barriers related to size and financial capability. calls for the swift and effective implementation of the new public procurement and concession directives (Directives 2014/24/EU , 2014/25/EU and 2014/23/EU ) in order to achieve greater participation by social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in tendering procedures for public contracts. The Member States are also called on to implement these procurement principles properly in all tendering and selection procedures, with wide use of the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT), in compliance with environmental, social and labour law obligations.

Members also regretted that the Commission Digital Single Market strategy for Europe fails to mention social and solidarity-based economy enterprises and their potential contribution to the achievement of the Union's goals.

Financing : Members regretted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises encounter even more difficulties than traditional enterprises in securing financing, whether through public or private channels. They therefore called for public authorities and financial service providers to develop a wide range of appropriate financial instruments. They also called on the Commission to review the ceiling for loans to social enterprises laid down under EaSI, and to determine whether this reflects market conditions.

In general, they highlighted the need to support social and solidarity-based economy enterprises with sufficient financial resources at local, regional, national and EU level, creating synergies among the various types of enterprises. They considered it necessary, therefore, to improve access to financing for the social and solidarity-based economy by various means, such as European funds, risk capital funds, microcredit and crowdfunding.

Members called on the Commission to propose a new exception to the legal definition of ‘SME’, similar to those which already apply to public investment corporations, venture capital firms and non-profit-making universities and research centres, so that a training and placement enterprise can be classified as an autonomous enterprise , even if another enterprise holds, alone or jointly with other enterprises, more than 25% of its capital or of the voting rights on its administrative board.

Training : Members pointed out that the social and solidarity-based economy could help considerably to reduce youth unemployment in the EU. They called on the Member States to develop training programmes targeted on and specifically tailored to entrepreneurs in the social sector, with particular reference to groups with lower employment rates such as women, young or disadvantaged workers. They pointed out that sectors with a wide margin for growth and job creation, such as the ‘white’ and ‘green’ sectors, are those in which the social and solidarity-based economy is very much present. They urged the Member States, accordingly, to promote education and training in those sectors.

Support and promotion : Members deeply regretted the low level of recognition of the social and solidarity-based economy at European level . They are in favour of creating a multilingual digital platform for exchanging information aimed at social enterprises, business incubators, business clusters and investors in social enterprises.

They call on the Commission to:

carry out a comparative analysis of national certification and labelling systems for the social and solidarity-based economy; to promote the creation of business incubators for social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, and to implement and effectively promote the internet platform for data exchange between social investors and social entrepreneurs (the Social Innovation Europe Platform), details of which have been agreed on.

They equally supported the idea that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises could form a specific company category with its own legal status , defined as having other objectives than simply profit for shareholders.

Lastly, Members called on the Commission to come forward with a legal framework for such enterprises, to be achieved by means of the European statute for cooperative societies, associations, foundations and mutual societies .

Documents
2015/07/15
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/07/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/05/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/04/15
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/01/05
   EP - LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0247/2015 - Verónica Lope Fontagné - § 50 #

2015/09/10 Outcome: +: 497, -: 87, 0: 25
DE IT PL ES RO HU FR CZ PT BE NL SE BG HR SK AT LT FI SI LV MT EE LU DK EL CY IE GB
Total
82
64
42
43
24
20
62
18
17
16
20
18
12
11
13
17
8
9
7
6
6
5
5
12
6
2
5
58
icon: PPE PPE
185

Lithuania PPE

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
155

Belgium S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2
3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
56

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
4

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0247/2015 - Verónica Lope Fontagné - § 51 #

2015/09/10 Outcome: +: 474, -: 79, 0: 46
DE IT ES RO HU PL FR PT CZ SE AT BE BG HR SK LT DK SI NL LU EE FI MT IE LV EL CY GB
Total
82
62
42
25
20
41
62
17
18
18
17
15
12
11
13
8
10
7
18
6
6
7
6
5
6
5
1
58
icon: PPE PPE
180

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Netherlands PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
156

Belgium S&D

2
3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
54

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
4

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0247/2015 - Verónica Lope Fontagné - Résolution #

2015/09/10 Outcome: +: 494, -: 91, 0: 23
DE IT PL ES RO HU FR BE CZ PT SE BG SK HR AT LT NL FI SI LU EE MT LV GB DK IE CY EL
Total
83
64
42
44
25
20
62
15
17
16
18
12
13
11
17
8
20
9
7
6
6
6
5
57
12
5
1
6
icon: PPE PPE
182

Lithuania PPE

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Greece PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
157

Belgium S&D

2
3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
4

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
204 2014/2236(INI)
2015/05/26 EMPL 180 amendments...
source: 557.256
2015/07/14 EMPL 24 amendments...
source: 560.697

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.751
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-554751_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.256
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-557256_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.697
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-560697_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-07-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0247_EN.html title: A8-0247/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-07-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0247_EN.html title: A8-0247/2015
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150909&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2015-09-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0320_EN.html title: T8-0320/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-09-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0320_EN.html title: T8-0320/2015
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica date: 2015-01-05T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0247&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0247_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0320
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0320_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: GUE/NGL name: SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2015-07-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: GUE/NGL name: SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2015-07-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0247&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0247/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150909&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0320 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0320/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
docs
  • date: 2015-04-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.751 title: PE554.751 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.256 title: PE557.256 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.697 title: PE560.697 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26067&j=0&l=en title: SP(2015)748 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-15T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0247&language=EN title: A8-0247/2015 summary: The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted a report by Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ (EPP, ES) on Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in combating unemployment. Members recalled that the social and solidarity-based economy provides employment for more than 14 million people , representing around 6.5% of workers in the EU and that there are 2 million social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in the EU, representing 10% of undertakings in the Union . Definition of social economy enterprises : Members noted that that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which do not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations , are enterprises whose purpose is to achieve their social goal , which may be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services for their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvest their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives . The social and solidarity-based economy enterprises are characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values: the primacy of individual and social goals over the interests of capital; democratic governance by members ; the conjunction of the interests of members and users with the general interest; the safeguarding and application of the principles of solidarity and responsibility; the reinvestment of surplus funds in long-term development objectives, or in the provision of services of interest to members or of services of general interest; voluntary and open membership; autonomous management independent of the public authorities. In this context, Members considered that the Commission should: recognise the diversity of social enterprises and ensure that actions are taken at EU level to support social and solidarity-based enterprises of all types; implement all the measures set out in the 2012 Social Business Initiative so as to broaden and deepen its scope to the key players in the social and solidarity-based economy; recognise and support the role of not-for-profit social service providers, both politically and financially. Members noted that the social and solidarity-based economy cannot replace the welfare state and public services . They welcomed the fact that four EU Member States (Spain, France, Portugal and Belgium) have national legislation concerning the social and solidarity-based economy, while Poland has launched a strategy to develop the social and solidarity-based economy and Romania is discussing the adoption of legislation to regulate the social and solidarity-based economy. Europe 2020 strategy : Members recognised that the EU remains far from achieving the targets set in the Europe 2020 strategy, particularly those relating to employment, innovation and the reduction of poverty and social exclusion. They emphasised that, given its social and inclusive nature, the social and solidarity-based economy offers jobs to the groups most often excluded from the open labour market . They called therefore on the Member States to better integrate social and solidarity-based economy enterprises into action plans for employment and social integration. Public procurement : Members pointed out that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises face difficulties in accessing public procurement, such as barriers related to size and financial capability. calls for the swift and effective implementation of the new public procurement and concession directives (Directives 2014/24/EU , 2014/25/EU and 2014/23/EU ) in order to achieve greater participation by social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in tendering procedures for public contracts. The Member States are also called on to implement these procurement principles properly in all tendering and selection procedures, with wide use of the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT), in compliance with environmental, social and labour law obligations. Members also regretted that the Commission Digital Single Market strategy for Europe fails to mention social and solidarity-based economy enterprises and their potential contribution to the achievement of the Union's goals. Financing : Members regretted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises encounter even more difficulties than traditional enterprises in securing financing, whether through public or private channels. They therefore called for public authorities and financial service providers to develop a wide range of appropriate financial instruments. They also called on the Commission to review the ceiling for loans to social enterprises laid down under EaSI, and to determine whether this reflects market conditions. In general, they highlighted the need to support social and solidarity-based economy enterprises with sufficient financial resources at local, regional, national and EU level, creating synergies among the various types of enterprises. They considered it necessary, therefore, to improve access to financing for the social and solidarity-based economy by various means, such as European funds, risk capital funds, microcredit and crowdfunding. Members called on the Commission to propose a new exception to the legal definition of ‘SME’, similar to those which already apply to public investment corporations, venture capital firms and non-profit-making universities and research centres, so that a training and placement enterprise can be classified as an autonomous enterprise , even if another enterprise holds, alone or jointly with other enterprises, more than 25% of its capital or of the voting rights on its administrative board. Training : Members pointed out that the social and solidarity-based economy could help considerably to reduce youth unemployment in the EU. They called on the Member States to develop training programmes targeted on and specifically tailored to entrepreneurs in the social sector, with particular reference to groups with lower employment rates such as women, young or disadvantaged workers. They pointed out that sectors with a wide margin for growth and job creation, such as the ‘white’ and ‘green’ sectors, are those in which the social and solidarity-based economy is very much present. They urged the Member States, accordingly, to promote education and training in those sectors. Support and promotion : Members deeply regretted the low level of recognition of the social and solidarity-based economy at European level . They are in favour of creating a multilingual digital platform for exchanging information aimed at social enterprises, business incubators, business clusters and investors in social enterprises. They call on the Commission to: carry out a comparative analysis of national certification and labelling systems for the social and solidarity-based economy; to promote the creation of business incubators for social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, and to implement and effectively promote the internet platform for data exchange between social investors and social entrepreneurs (the Social Innovation Europe Platform), details of which have been agreed on. They equally supported the idea that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises could form a specific company category with its own legal status , defined as having other objectives than simply profit for shareholders. Lastly, Members called on the Commission to come forward with a legal framework for such enterprises, to be achieved by means of the European statute for cooperative societies, associations, foundations and mutual societies .
  • date: 2015-09-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150909&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26067&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0320 title: T8-0320/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 494 votes to 91 with 23 abstentions, a resolution on Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in combating unemployment. Parliament recalled that the social and solidarity-based economy provided employment for more than 14 million people , representing around 6.5% of workers in the EU and that there were 2 million social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in the EU, representing 10% of undertakings in the Union. Definition of social economy enterprises : Parliament noted that that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which did not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations , were enterprises whose purpose was to achieve their social goal , which might be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services for their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvested their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives. The social and solidarity-based economy enterprises were characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values: the primacy of individual and social goals over the interests of capital; democratic governance by members; the conjunction of the interests of members and users with the general interest; the safeguarding and application of the principles of solidarity and responsibility; the reinvestment of surplus funds in long-term development objectives, or in the provision of services of interest to members or of services of general interest; voluntary and open membership; autonomous management independent of the public authorities. In this context, Members considered that the Commission should: recognise the diversity of social enterprises and ensure that actions are taken at EU level to support social and solidarity-based enterprises of all types; implement all the measures set out in the 2012 Social Business Initiative so as to broaden and deepen its scope to the key players in the social and solidarity-based economy; recognise and support the role of not-for-profit social service providers, both politically and financially. Parliament noted that the social and solidarity-based economy cannot replace the welfare state and public services . It welcomed the fact that four EU Member States (Spain, France, Portugal and Belgium) have national legislation concerning the social and solidarity-based economy, while Poland has launched a strategy to develop the social and solidarity-based economy and Romania is discussing the adoption of legislation to regulate the social and solidarity-based economy. Europe 2020 strategy : Parliament recognised that the EU remains far from achieving the targets set in the Europe 2020 strategy, particularly those relating to employment, innovation and the reduction of poverty and social exclusion. It emphasised that, given its social and inclusive nature, the social and solidarity-based economy offers jobs to the groups most often excluded from the open labour market . It called therefore on Member States to better integrate social and solidarity-based economy enterprises into action plans for employment and social integration. It welcomed the fact that the pre-financing budget for the Youth Employment Initiative had been increased to 30 %. Parliament called on the Commission and Member States to encourage social entrepreneurship and innovation in the ESF's national Operational Programmes and urged that the Youth Guarantee schemes be implemented effectively. Public procurement : Parliament pointed out that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises face difficulties in accessing public procurement, such as barriers related to size and financial capability. It calls for the swift and effective implementation of the new public procurement and concession directives (Directives 2014/24/EU , 2014/25/EU and 2014/23/EU ) in order to achieve greater participation by social and solidarity-based economy enterprises in tendering procedures for public contracts. Member States were also called on to implement these procurement principles properly in all tendering and selection procedures, with wide use of the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT), in compliance with environmental, social and labour law obligations. Parliament welcomed the reform of the public procurement and concession directives, which includes social clauses and criteria in order to promote social inclusion and social innovation and contracts earmarked to foster the employment of the most disadvantaged people on the labour market. It regretted that the Commission Digital Single Market strategy for Europe fails to mention social and solidarity-based economy enterprises and their potential contribution to the achievement of the Union's goals. Financing : Parliament regretted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises encounter even more difficulties than traditional enterprises in securing financing, whether through public or private channels. It therefore called for public authorities and financial service providers to develop a wide range of appropriate financial instruments. It also called on the Commission to review the ceiling for loans to social enterprises laid down under EaSI, and to determine whether this reflects market conditions. Parliament welcomed the fact that part of the funding for the EaSI programme is earmarked to help provide access to finance for social and solidarity-based economy enterprises. It called on the Member States to establish national contact points or one-stop shops to help social and solidarity-based economy actors access the EU´s funding schemes. In general, Parliament highlighted the need to support social and solidarity-based economy enterprises with sufficient financial resources at local, regional, national and EU level, creating synergies among the various types of enterprises. It considered it necessary, therefore, to improve access to financing for the social and solidarity-based economy by various means, such as European funds, risk capital funds, microcredit and crowdfunding. It called on the Commission to propose a new exception to the legal definition of ‘SME’, similar to those which already apply to public investment corporations, venture capital firms and non-profit-making universities and research centres, so that a training and placement enterprise can be classified as an autonomous enterprise , even if another enterprise holds, alone or jointly with other enterprises, more than 25% of its capital or of the voting rights on its administrative board. Parliament pointed out that the state aid rules should not constitute an impediment for public funding to social and solidarity-based economy enterprises and social services. Training: Parliament pointed out that the social and solidarity-based economy could help considerably to reduce youth unemployment in the EU. It called on the Member States to develop training programmes targeted on and specifically tailored to entrepreneurs in the social sector, with particular reference to groups with lower employment rates such as women, young or disadvantaged workers. It pointed out that sectors with a wide margin for growth and job creation, such as the ‘white’ and ‘green’ sectors, are those in which the social and solidarity-based economy is very much present. It urged the Member States, accordingly, to promote education and training in those sectors. Support and promotion : Parliament deeply regretted the low level of recognition of the social and solidarity-based economy at European level. It was in favour of creating a multilingual digital platform for exchanging information aimed at social enterprises, business incubators, business clusters and investors in social enterprises. It called on the Commission to: carry out a comparative analysis of national certification and labelling systems for the social and solidarity-based economy; promote the creation of business incubators for social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, and to implement and effectively promote the internet platform for data exchange between social investors and social entrepreneurs (the Social Innovation Europe Platform), details of which have been agreed on. Parliament equally supported the idea that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises could form a specific company category with its own legal status , defined as having other objectives than simply profit for shareholders. Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to come forward with a legal framework for such enterprises, to be achieved by means of the European statute for cooperative societies, associations, foundations and mutual societies.
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
EMPL/8/01437
New
  • EMPL/8/01437
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.15 Employment policy, action to combat unemployment
New
4.15
Employment policy, action to combat unemployment
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0247&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0247/2015
activities/3/date
Old
2015-09-08T00:00:00
New
2015-09-09T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150909&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/date
Old
2015-09-07T00:00:00
New
2015-09-10T00:00:00
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0320 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0320/2015
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2
date
2015-07-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2015-09-07T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/1
date
2015-07-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1
date
2015-06-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
AGEA Laura
activities/1/date
Old
2015-07-15T00:00:00
New
2015-06-23T00:00:00
committees/0/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
AGEA Laura
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
HARKIN Marian
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
HARKIN Marian
activities/2
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław
activities/1
date
2015-07-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
GUE/NGL
name
SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis
committees/0/shadows/1
group
GUE/NGL
name
SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
EMPL/8/01437
reference
2014/2236(INI)
title
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combatting unemployment
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.15 Employment policy, action to combat unemployment