BETA


2014/2817(INI) Conclusion of an EU/Moldova association agreement

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras (icon: ALDE ALDE) GAHLER Michael (icon: PPE PPE), FAJON Tanja (icon: S&D S&D), DZHAMBAZKI Angel (icon: ECR ECR), ŠOLTES Igor (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), GRIGULE-PĒTERSE Iveta (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion INTA MOISĂ Sorin (icon: S&D S&D) William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH (icon: EFDD EFDD), Emma McCLARKIN (icon: ECR ECR), David MARTIN (icon: S&D S&D), Marietje SCHAAKE (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2

Events

2015/02/20
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2014/11/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/11/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2014/11/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 529 votes to 96, with 46 abstentions, a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part.

Parliament recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. It stated that in the last few years, thanks to the political determination of its government, Moldova has made significant progress in reforms and in strengthening relations with the EU. This is why it reaffirmed that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law.

Objectives of the Agreement : Parliament recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. It stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. It also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds.

Electoral process : Parliament recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In an oral amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad. It urged the authorities to work closely with the OSCE/ODIHR, the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe and to address their recommendations and highlighted the important role that political actors and parties play and the need to adopt an effective legislation that ensures transparency in party financing . Parliament is committed to ensuring the presence of election observers and will send its own election observation mission to observe the parliamentary elections of 30 November 2014.

Parliament also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms.

Reforms : Parliament noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards:

the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels; the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances; the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture; the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities; the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district; the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality.

It fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation. It also took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)).

Political and economic enhancement of Moldova : Parliament highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. It called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, Parliament urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community.

It reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova.

Parliamentary scrutiny : Parliament believes that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. It called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament . It noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014.

Pressure from Russia : Parliament strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. It called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. It fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova.

Parliament is concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours . It reiterated its conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests , and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such. It recalled that each country has every right to make its own political choices.

Transnistria : plenary recalled that earlier this year Russia staged military exercises in Moldova’s breakaway Transnistria region and that the parliament of Transnistria reiterated its appeal to Moscow to be allowed to join Russian. In this regard, Parliament called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. It expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner.

According to the Parliament, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria , as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement . Overall, it stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties.

Energy issue : lastly, Parliament took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. It welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.

Documents
2014/11/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/10/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted, in accordance with Rule 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, the report by Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS (ADLE, LT) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part.

Members recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. This is why they reaffirm that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law.

Objectives of the Agreement : Members recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. They stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. They also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds.

Electoral process : Members recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In parallel, they called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad . They also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms.

Reforms : Members noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards:

the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels; the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances; the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture; the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities; the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district; the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality.

Members fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation.

They took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)).

Political and economic enhancement of Moldova : Members highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. They called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, they urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community.

Members reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova.

Parliamentary scrutiny : Members believe that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. They called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament . They noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014.

Pressure from Russia : Members strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. They called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. They fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova.

Members are concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours . They reiterated their conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests , and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such.

Transnistria : Members called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. They expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner.

According to Members, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria , as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement . Overall, they stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties.

Energy issue : lastly, Members took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. They welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.

Documents
2014/10/16
   EP - Vote in committee
2014/10/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2014/10/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2014/09/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2014/09/03
   EP - MOISĂ Sorin (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2014/07/09
   EP - AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0022/2014 - Petras Auštrevičius - Résolution #

2014/11/13 Outcome: +: 529, -: 96, 0: 46
DE PL IT ES GB FR RO BE HU PT SE BG LT CZ AT HR FI DK SK NL SI LU IE MT LV EE EL CY
Total
85
47
71
49
67
65
20
20
18
19
17
12
11
19
17
10
10
12
11
25
7
6
9
6
6
5
20
6
icon: PPE PPE
197

Sweden PPE

2
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
167

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
62

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
46

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Germany GUE/NGL

5

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
45

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Austria NI

3

Netherlands NI

4

Latvia NI

1
AmendmentsDossier
119 2014/2817(INI)
2014/10/01 INTA 20 amendments...
source: 539.578
2014/10/02 AFET 99 amendments...
source: 539.500

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.389
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-537389_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.500
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-539500_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.395&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-537395_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/1
date
2014-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2014-0022_EN.html title: A8-0022/2014
summary
events/1
date
2014-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2014-0022_EN.html title: A8-0022/2014
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141113&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2014-11-13-TOC_EN.html
events/4
date
2014-11-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0049_EN.html title: T8-0049/2014
summary
events/4
date
2014-11-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0049_EN.html title: T8-0049/2014
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras date: 2014-07-09T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2014-07-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
associated
False
rapporteur
name: MOISĂ Sorin date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
associated
False
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOISĂ Sorin group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/3/body
EC
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0022&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2014-0022_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0049
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0049_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2014-07-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2014-07-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2014-10-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: GAHLER Michael group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: GRIGULE Iveta responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-07-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: S&D name: MOISĂ Sorin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2014-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0022&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0022/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24823&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141113&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0049 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0049/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2014-07-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2014-07-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
associated
False
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOISĂ Sorin group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: S&D name: MOISĂ Sorin
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
docs
  • date: 2014-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.389 title: PE537.389 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2014-10-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.500 title: PE539.500 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2014-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE537.395&secondRef=02 title: PE537.395 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=24823&j=0&l=en title: SP(2015)42 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2014-10-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-10-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0022&language=EN title: A8-0022/2014 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted, in accordance with Rule 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, the report by Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS (ADLE, LT) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part. Members recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. This is why they reaffirm that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law. Objectives of the Agreement : Members recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. They stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. They also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds. Electoral process : Members recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In parallel, they called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad . They also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms. Reforms : Members noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards: the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels; the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances; the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture; the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities; the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district; the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality. Members fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation. They took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)). Political and economic enhancement of Moldova : Members highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. They called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, they urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community. Members reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova. Parliamentary scrutiny : Members believe that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. They called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament . They noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014. Pressure from Russia : Members strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. They called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. They fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova. Members are concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours . They reiterated their conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests , and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such. Transnistria : Members called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. They expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner. According to Members, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria , as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement . Overall, they stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties. Energy issue : lastly, Members took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. They welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.
  • date: 2014-11-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24823&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-11-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141113&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-11-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0049 title: T8-0049/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 529 votes to 96, with 46 abstentions, a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part. Parliament recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. It stated that in the last few years, thanks to the political determination of its government, Moldova has made significant progress in reforms and in strengthening relations with the EU. This is why it reaffirmed that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law. Objectives of the Agreement : Parliament recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. It stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. It also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds. Electoral process : Parliament recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In an oral amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad. It urged the authorities to work closely with the OSCE/ODIHR, the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe and to address their recommendations and highlighted the important role that political actors and parties play and the need to adopt an effective legislation that ensures transparency in party financing . Parliament is committed to ensuring the presence of election observers and will send its own election observation mission to observe the parliamentary elections of 30 November 2014. Parliament also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms. Reforms : Parliament noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards: the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels; the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances; the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture; the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities; the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district; the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality. It fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation. It also took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)). Political and economic enhancement of Moldova : Parliament highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. It called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, Parliament urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community. It reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova. Parliamentary scrutiny : Parliament believes that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. It called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament . It noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014. Pressure from Russia : Parliament strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. It called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. It fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova. Parliament is concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours . It reiterated its conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests , and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such. It recalled that each country has every right to make its own political choices. Transnistria : plenary recalled that earlier this year Russia staged military exercises in Moldova’s breakaway Transnistria region and that the parliament of Transnistria reiterated its appeal to Moscow to be allowed to join Russian. In this regard, Parliament called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. It expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner. According to the Parliament, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria , as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement . Overall, it stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties. Energy issue : lastly, Parliament took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. It welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.
  • date: 2014-11-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/01046
    New
    • AFET/8/01046
    procedure/geographical_area/0
    Moldova
    procedure/geographical_area/0
    Moldova, Republic
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 105-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p1
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    • 6.40.15 European neighbourhood policy
    New
    6.20.03
    Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    6.40.15
    European neighbourhood policy
    procedure/summary
    • See also
    procedure/type
    Old
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    New
    • INI - Own-initiative procedure
    • See also 2014/0083(NLE)
    activities/2/docs/0
    url
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24823&l=en
    type
    Results of vote in Parliament
    title
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Debate in Parliament
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/1/docs/0/text/0
    Old

    The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS (ADLE, LT) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part.

    Members recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. This is why they reaffirm that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law.

    Objectives of the Agreement: Members recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. They stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. They also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds.

    Electoral process: Members recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In parallel, they called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad. They also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms.

    Reforms: Members noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards:

    • the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels;
    • the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances;
    • the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture;
    • the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities;
    • the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district;
    • the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality.

    Members fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation.

    They took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)).

    Political and economic enhancement of Moldova: Members highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. They called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, they urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community.

    Members reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova.

    Parliamentary scrutiny: Members believe that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. They called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament. They noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014.

    Pressure from Russia: Members strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. They called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. They fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova.

    Members are concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours. They reiterated their conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests, and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such.

    Transnistria: Members called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. They expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner.

    According to Members, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria, as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement. Overall, they stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties.

    Energy issue: lastly, Members took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. They welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.

    New

    The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted, in accordance with Rule 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, the report by Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS (ADLE, LT) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part.

    Members recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. This is why they reaffirm that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law.

    Objectives of the Agreement: Members recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. They stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. They also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds.

    Electoral process: Members recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In parallel, they called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad. They also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms.

    Reforms: Members noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards:

    • the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels;
    • the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances;
    • the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture;
    • the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities;
    • the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district;
    • the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality.

    Members fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation.

    They took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)).

    Political and economic enhancement of Moldova: Members highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. They called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, they urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community.

    Members reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova.

    Parliamentary scrutiny: Members believe that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. They called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament. They noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014.

    Pressure from Russia: Members strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. They called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. They fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova.

    Members are concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours. They reiterated their conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests, and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such.

    Transnistria: Members called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. They expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner.

    According to Members, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria, as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement. Overall, they stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties.

    Energy issue: lastly, Members took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. They welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.

    activities/2/docs/0
    url
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141113&type=CRE
    type
    Debate in Parliament
    title
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/2/docs/1/text
    • The European Parliament adopted by 529 votes to 96, with 46 abstentions, a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part.

      Parliament recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. It stated that in the last few years, thanks to the political determination of its government, Moldova has made significant progress in reforms and in strengthening relations with the EU. This is why it reaffirmed that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law.

      Objectives of the Agreement: Parliament recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. It stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. It also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds.

      Electoral process: Parliament recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In an oral amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad. It urged the authorities to work closely with the OSCE/ODIHR, the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe and to address their recommendations and highlighted the important role that political actors and parties play and the need to adopt an effective legislation that ensures transparency in party financing. Parliament is committed to ensuring the presence of election observers and will send its own election observation mission to observe the parliamentary elections of 30 November 2014.

      Parliament also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms.

      Reforms: Parliament noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards:

      • the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels;
      • the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances;
      • the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture;
      • the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities;
      • the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district;
      • the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality.

      It fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation. It also took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)).

      Political and economic enhancement of Moldova: Parliament highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. It called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, Parliament urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community.

      It reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova.

      Parliamentary scrutiny: Parliament believes that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. It called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament. It noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014.

      Pressure from Russia: Parliament strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. It called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. It fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova.

      Parliament is concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours. It reiterated its conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests, and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such. It recalled that each country has every right to make its own political choices.

      Transnistria: plenary recalled that earlier this year Russia staged military exercises in Moldova’s breakaway Transnistria region and that the parliament of Transnistria reiterated its appeal to Moscow to be allowed to join Russian. In this regard, Parliament called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. It expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner.

      According to the Parliament, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria, as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement. Overall, it stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties.

      Energy issue: lastly, Parliament took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. It welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.

    activities/2
    date
    2014-11-13T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in Parliament
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0049 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0049/2014
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/2
    date
    2014-11-13T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Vote scheduled
    activities/1/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS (ADLE, LT) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Moldova, of the other part.

      Members recalled that the conclusion of the Association Agreement is not an end in itself, but is part of a broader process of enhancing the European perspective of Moldova. This is why they reaffirm that the country may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law.

      Objectives of the Agreement: Members recalled that the Agreement is for the benefit of the whole population. They stressed, therefore, the need to address in a timely and proper manner the social consequences of the associated reforms. They also stressed that both Moldova and the EU should be involved in the implementation of the Association Agenda, and that the priorities set out therein should receive appropriate technical and financial support so that the benefits of association are visible to Moldovan citizens as soon as possible whilst ensuring the monitoring of the absorption capacity and the use of EU funds.

      Electoral process: Members recalled the importance of strengthening the stability, independence and effectiveness of the institutions responsible for guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and good governance, and of consolidating the system of protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Moldova. In parallel, they called on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad. They also noted the need to amend Article 78 of the Moldovan Constitution, on the election of the President, to avoid a resurgence of institutional deadlock which would be detrimental to the pace of reforms.

      Reforms: Members noted the progress made by the Republic of Moldova’s authorities in implementing the European reform agenda, but called for further improvements as regards:

      • the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels;
      • the need to enhance transparency and accountability in the management of public finances;
      • the need to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators of ill-treatment and torture;
      • the need to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, in particular for ethnic, religious and LGBT minorities;
      • the importance for the government to conduct a dialogue with representatives of all ethnic minorities and provide technical and financial support for infrastructure improvements in the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and the Taraklia district;
      • the need to strengthen media freedom and plurality.

      Members fully supported the visa-free regime for Moldovan citizens and called on the Moldovan authorities to continue to disseminate information regarding rights and duties in relation to visa liberalisation.

      They took note of the improvement in the capacities of the customs and border guard services and the continued demarcation of the border with Ukraine (including in the context of the work of the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM)).

      Political and economic enhancement of Moldova: Members highlighted the need to continue the work of professionalising and depoliticising central and local public administration, as this too will contribute greatly to the full implementation of the Association Agreement. They called on Moldova to carry out the decentralisation strategy in an inclusive manner. Members also pointed out the importance of effective local municipal authorities and adequate infrastructure in developing rural areas which is a pre-condition for reducing the rate of rural depopulation. They expect that the implementation of the Association Agreement/DCFTA will contribute to sustainable development and the smooth integration of the Moldovan economy into the world markets, stimulating its process of modernisation and creating better working conditions. In this regard, they urged the Commission to provide assistance and to advise Moldova on how to effectively deal with adaptation challenges in the short term, inter alia through cooperation with trade unions and the local business community.

      Members reiterated the need for a transparent business and investment environment, appropriate regulatory reform and the continuation of the privatisation process, in order to boost the competitiveness of the economy of Moldova.

      Parliamentary scrutiny: Members believe that parliamentary scrutiny is a fundamental condition for democratic support for EU policies. They called, therefore, on the Commission to facilitate in a timely manner the regular and detailed monitoring of the implementation of the DCFTA by Parliament. They noted that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014.

      Pressure from Russia: Members strongly deplored the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the region by introducing several import bans on products from Moldova, in violation of Russia’s WTO commitments. They called on the Russian Federation to respect fully the territorial integrity of Moldova and its European choice. They fully supported the Commission’s initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the autonomous trade preferences afforded to Moldova.

      Members are concerned over Russia’s actions aimed at undermining the association process of the EU’s Eastern neighbours. They reiterated their conviction that the association process of the EU’s Eastern partners is not a threat to Russia’s political and economic interests, and regretted that Russian leadership regards it as such.

      Transnistria: Members called on Chisinau and Tiraspol to continue to engage constructively in order to find an effective solution for the settlement of the Transnistria issue and to take concrete steps to improve the livelihoods of the population. They expressed disappointment that so far the ‘5+2’ framework has failed to offer a solution and demands a greater role for the EU, in particular by upgrading its status to that of a negotiating partner.

      According to Members, it is essential to ensure that Transnistria, as an integral part of Moldova, is covered by the reach and effects of the Association Agreement. Overall, they stressed the importance, in this respect, of enhancing people-to-people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving reconciliation between the parties.

      Energy issue: lastly, Members took note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and called on the Government of Moldova to review and strengthen the 2013-2015 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align climate-change policies and targets with those of the EU. They welcomed the opening of the IaMi-Ungheni gas interconnector and called on the Commission to intensify efforts in the construction of the Ungheni-Chisinau pipeline by strengthening financial support in order to finalise the project as soon as possible.

    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4
    group
    EFD
    name
    GRIGULE Iveta
    activities/1/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2014-0022&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0022/2014
    committees/0/shadows/4
    group
    EFD
    name
    GRIGULE Iveta
    activities
    • date: 2014-10-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: GAHLER Michael group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-07-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: S&D name: MOISĂ Sorin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
    • date: 2014-10-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2014-11-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: GAHLER Michael group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-07-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: S&D name: MOISĂ Sorin
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/01046
      geographical_area
      Moldova, Republic
      reference
      2014/2817(INI)
      title
      Conclusion of an EU/Moldova association agreement
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p1
      stage_reached
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      summary
      See also
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject