Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | HOHLMEIER Monika ( PPE) | CHINNICI Caterina ( S&D), MACOVEI Monica ( ECR), JEŽEK Petr ( ALDE), JOLY Eva ( Verts/ALE), AGEA Laura ( EFDD), FONTANA Lorenzo ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Legal Basis Opinion | JURI | CAVADA Jean-Marie ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 082-p2, TFEU 083-p1-a1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 082-p2, TFEU 083-p1-a1Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to strengthen the legal framework in force in the EU on tackling terrorism.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA.
CONTENT: in light of evolving terrorist threats and taking into account the cross-border nature of terrorism, the Directive establishes:
minimum rules concerning the definition of: (i) criminal offences and sanctions in the area of terrorist offences, (ii) offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities; measures of protection of, and support and assistance to, victims of terrorism.
Terrorist offences : the Directive lists exhaustively a number of serious offences , such as the attacks upon a person’s life, the manufacture or use of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons, as intentional acts which may be classified as terrorist offences when committed for a particular terrorist purpose, namely:
seriously intimidating a population; unduly compelling a government or an international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act; seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation.
Offences related to terrorist activities : the Directive establishes that a criminal offence shall include:
the distribution, whether online or offline , of a message with the intention of inciting a terrorist offense, for example by glorifying terrorist acts; soliciting and recruiting another person to commit a terrorist offence; providing or receiving training for terrorist purposes, for example, in the making or use of explosives, firearms or hazardous or noxious substances; travelling inside, outside or to the EU for purposes of terrorism, for example to participate in the activities of a terrorist group or to carry out a terrorist attack; the organisation and facilitation of such travel , including logistical or material support, such as ticket purchases or route planning; providing or collecting funds with the intention that they be used or in the knowledge that they be used to commit terrorist offences.
Penalties and sanctions should be provided for natural and legal persons being liable for such offences, which reflect the seriousness of such offences.
Online provocative content : Member States should take measures to (i) promptly remove illegal online content constituting a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, that is hosted in their territory; (ii) obtain the removal of such content hosted outside their territory.
Measures to remove content and block access should be established through transparent procedures and provide adequate safeguards.
Rights of victims of terrorism : the Directive provides for a range of services to meet the special needs of victims of terrorism, such as the right to immediate access to professional support services providing medical and emotional and psychological support , legal or practical advice, and assistance with claims .
Member States shall ensure that victims of terrorism who are residents of a Member State other than that where the terrorist offence was committed have access to information regarding their rights, the available support services and compensation schemes in the Member State where the terrorist offence was committed.
Emergency response mechanisms have also been strengthened to assist victims of terrorism immediately after a terrorist attack.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 20.4.2017.
TRANSPOSITION: no later than 8.9.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 498 votes to 114 with 29 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism.
Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose : Parliament stressed that the cross-border nature of terrorism requires a strong coordinated response and cooperation within and between the Member States, as well as with and among the competent Union agencies and bodies to counter terrorism, including Eurojust and Europol.
It also stipulated that the Directive establish specific measures of protection of and assistance and support to victims of terrorism.
Terrorist offences : the draft Directive exhaustively lists a number of serious crimes, as intentional acts that can qualify as terrorist offences when and insofar as committed with a specific terrorist aim, namely:
to seriously intimidate a population; to unduly compel a government or an international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or to seriously destabilise or destroy the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation.
Such intentional acts include: (i) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death; (ii) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of explosives or weapons, including chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons, as well as research into, and development of these weapons; (iii) illegal system interference.
Offences linked to terrorist activities : the offence of public provocation to commit a terrorist offence act comprises, inter alia, the glorification and justification of terrorism or the dissemination of messages or images online and offline , including those related to the victims of terrorism as a way to gather support for terrorist causes or seriously intimidating the population.
Furthermore, each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that travelling to a country other than that Member State is punishable as a criminal offence where the aim is to (i) commit, or contribute to the commission of, a terrorist offence; (ii) participate in the activities of a terrorist group with knowledge of the fact that such participation will contribute to the criminal activities of such a group; (iii) provide or receive training for terrorism.
When recruitment and training for terrorism are directed towards a child , Member States should ensure that judges can take this circumstance into account when sentencing offenders.
Measures against illegal terrorist content on the internet : Member States shall take the necessary measures to: (i) ensure the prompt removal of illegal content publicly inciting others to commit a terrorist offence that is hosted in their territory; (ii) obtain the removal of such content hosted outside of their territory.
Measures of removal and blocking must be set following transparent procedures and provide adequate safeguards , in particular to ensure that those measures are limited to what is necessary and proportionate and that users are informed of the reason for those measures. Safeguards relating to removal or blocking shall also include the possibility of judicial redress.
Investigative tools and confiscation: Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that effective investigative tools, such as those which are used in organised crime or other serious crime cases, are available to persons responsible for investigating or prosecuting the offences and to ensure that their competent authorities freeze or confiscate the proceeds derived from criminal offences.
Assistance to victims of terrorism : Member States shall:
ensure that measures are available to protect victims of terrorism and their family members. Such measures include medical and psychological support, and assistance regarding compensation claims or access to legal aid; ensure that a comprehensive response to the specific needs of victims of terrorism immediately after a terrorist attack and for as long as necessary is provided within the national emergency-response infrastructure; ensure that victims of terrorism, who are residents of a Member State other than that where the terrorist offence was committed, have effective access to information about victims' rights, available support services and compensation schemes in the Member State where the terrorist offence was committed.
Radicalisation : Member States should pursue their efforts to prevent and counter radicalisation leading to terrorism by coordinating, by sharing information and experience on national prevention policies, taking into account their own needs, objectives and capabilities building on their own experiences. The Commission should, where appropriate, provide support to national, regional and local authorities in developing prevention policies.
Fundamental rights : the Directive shall not have the effect of modifying the obligations to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles, as enshrined in Article 6 TEU.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted a report by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose : the committee recalled that although the fight against terrorism remains primarily a matter for Member States, the terrorist attacks in Europe in 2015 and 2016 have highlighted the need for coordinated action on the part of the Member States to combat terrorism and address the threat which foreign fighters pose within the Union.
Members stipulated that the Directive establishes specific measures of protection of and assistance and support to victims of terrorism. A definition of the term ‘victim’ has been introduced.
Terrorist offences : intentional acts shall include:
using violence or the threat of violence to compel or seek to compel a government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act; attacks upon a persons' life which may cause death or injury; attacks upon the physical and psychological integrity of a person; manufacture of radiological weapons, as well as research into nuclear; release, or threatened release, of dangerous substances, including radiological or biological material; attacks against information systems.
Aggravating circumstances : Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that it is regarded as an aggravating circumstance when the commission of a criminal offence targets vulnerable natural persons, including children .
Punishable offences shall include:
receiving training or instruction, including by obtaining knowledge, documentation or practical skills, in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances; any travel to a country or a Member State, either directly or by transiting through one or several Member States, when it can be objectively demonstrated that it was made for the purpose of the commission of or contribution to a terrorist offence.
Financing terror : Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the freezing or seizure and confiscation of any funds and other assets used or allocated for the purpose of committing or attempting to commit any of the offences referred to in this Directive.
Measures against illegal terrorist content on the internet : Member States shall take the necessary measures to: (i) ensure the prompt removal of illegal content publicly inciting others to commit a terrorist offence that is hosted in their territory; (ii) obtain the removal of such content hosted outside of their territory. Measures on removal and blocking shall be subject to judicial review.
Jurisdiction and prosecution : each Member State shall take the measures required to establish its jurisdiction in respect of the offences in cases where the perpetrator is present on its territory.
Member States shall ensure cooperation and information sharing with the Member State that established its jurisdiction over the offences through established channels, including Union agencies.
Duty to investigate : upon receiving information that a person who has committed or who is alleged to have committed an offence set out in this Directive may be present on its territory, the Member State concerned shall take measures to investigate the facts contained in that information . Upon being satisfied that the circumstances warrant it, it shall take the appropriate measures to ensure that person's presence for the purpose of prosecution or extradition .
Prevention : Member States shall:
take appropriate measures to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment of citizens of the Union by terrorist organisations; take appropriate action, including online, such as providing information and education, undertaking awareness-raising campaigns and developing alternative narratives to counter terrorist propaganda; promote regular training for staff likely to come into contact with persons vulnerable to radicalisation, including front-line police officers and prison guards.
Member States shall work together with the Commission and internet service providers to develop a joint European strategy to combat online radicalisation and incitement to terrorism.
Obligation to exchange information concerning terrorist offences : each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that its competent authorities transmit to the competent authorities of the Member State concerned any relevant information in cases where there are reasons to believe that the information could assist in the detection, prevention, investigation or prosecution of offences referred to in this Directive. Member States shall systematically forward to Europol details of any person who is suspected of having committed or who has been convicted of at least one of the offences referred to in the Directive.
Member States shall guarantee their border and coast guard services access to the relevant databases, in particular the Europol Information System.
Protection and assistance to victims of terrorism : Member States shall ensure that measures are available to protect victims of terrorism and their family members. Particular attention shall be paid to the risk of intimidation and retaliation and to the need to protect the physical and psychological integrity of victims of terrorism, including during questioning and testifying. In addition, Members States shall ensure that free legal aid is provided to victims of terrorism who are parties to criminal proceedings.
Member States shall:
establish a coordination centre to bring together those organisations and experts competent to provide information, support and practical services to the victims and to their families and relatives; take the necessary measures in the framework of their emergency-response infrastructure to include victim support specialists in emergency planning and to facilitate and improve the process of identifying victims immediately in the aftermath of a terrorist attack.
Emergency situations and fundamental rights : Member States shall ensure that criminalisation is proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and necessary in a democratic society, and shall exclude any form of arbitrariness or discrimination.
In a time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation, Member States may take measures to derogate from certain rights, such circumstances shall not relieve the authorities from demonstrating that the measures undertaken are applied solely for the purpose of combating terrorism.
PURPOSE: to reform the legal framework in force in the EU on the criminalisation of behaviours linked to terrorist activities.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND : acts of terrorism constitute one of the most serious violations of the universal values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity, the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms on which the European Union is founded. They are serious attacks on the principles of democracy and the rule of law on which the European Union is founded.
The terrorist threat has grown and evolved in recent years. Individuals referred to as "foreign terrorist fighters" travel abroad for terrorism purposes. Returning foreign terrorist fighters pose a heightened security threat to all EU Member States. In addition, the European Union and its Member States face increased threats from individuals inspired or instructed by terrorist groups abroad but who remain within Europe.
By late 2014, the overall number of people who have departed from the EU to conflict areas was estimated to have exceeded 3000 and is now assessed to have reached 5000 while at the same time the number of returnees was reported to have increased in some Member States .
As emphasised by Europol, "individuals who have travelled to conflict zones will continue to pose a heightened threat to all EU Member States.’ The attacks carried out on European soil in the course of 2014 and 2015, culminating in the recent attacks in Paris on the night of 13 November 2015, tragically illustrated that this risk can materialise
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA already criminalises certain terrorist acts , including in particular the commission of terrorist attacks, participation in the activities of a terrorist group, including financial support to these activities, public provocation, recruitment and training to terrorism as well as rules on aiding and abetting, incitement and attempt of terrorist offences.
However, Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA needs to be reviewed to implement new international standards and obligations taken by the EU and to tackle the evolving terrorist threat in a more effective way, thereby enhancing the security of the EU and the safety of its citizens. Victims of terrorism also require protection, support and assistance that respond to their specific needs.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: given the urgent need to improve the EU framework to increase security in the light of recent terrorist attacks including by incorporating international obligations and standards, the proposal is exceptionally presented without an impact assessment.
CONTENT: the proposal replaces Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and seeks to put in place updated EU level legislation establishing minimum rules on the definition of terrorist offences, offenses related to a terrorist group or terrorist activities and penalties in this area. It also provides specific measures on protection, support and assistance to the victims of terrorism.
The proposed directive transposes into EU law international law obligations , such as those flowing from the provisions of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2178(2014) on foreign terrorist fighters, the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the prevention of terrorism and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations concerning terrorist financing.
Terrorist offences : the proposal defines which offences should be considered as terrorist offences in Member States. This provision was contained in Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and remained unchanged since then. The main aim of this key provision is to approximate the definition of terrorist offences in all Member States by introducing a specific and common qualification of certain acts as terrorist offences.
Offences relating to a terrorist group: the proposal requires Member States to criminalise the running of or participation in the activities of a terrorist group, with knowledge of the fact that such participation will contribute to the criminal activities of the terrorist group.
Offences relating to terrorist activities : the proposal requires Member States to criminalise:
a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence , where this is committed intentionally (e.g. the glorification of suicide bombers, encouragement to join violent jihad, direct invitations to kill non-believers, justification of terrorism or the dissemination of messages or images of brutal assassinations); recruitment for terrorism : the aim is to provide adequate criminal justice tools to stem extensive recruitment activities by individuals or recruitment networks; providing training for terrorism, e.g. providing instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, for the purpose of committing a terrorist offence. This is meant to capture the dissemination of instructions and (online) manuals intended for training or planning of attacks and more specifically the dissemination (through the internet) of information on terrorist methods, thus functioning as a ‘virtual training camp’; receiving training : this will provide law enforcement and prosecutors with additional tools to tackle the threats resulting from potential perpetrators, including those ultimately acting alone, by offering the possibility to investigate and prosecute training activities having the potential to lead to the commission of terrorist offences; travelling abroad for terrorism : this offence targets primarily the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters by criminalising travelling to another country for terrorist purposes. The provision covers both the travel to third countries, as well as to EU Member States, including those of the nationality or residence of the perpetrator. The travel to the State of destination may be direct or by transiting other States en route; organising or otherwise facilitating travelling abroad for terrorism , e.g. by purchasing tickets and planning of itineraries, or any other conduct which assists the traveller in reaching his or her destination, including by assisting the traveller in unlawfully crossing a border. In addition to acting intentionally, the perpetrator must know that the assistance is rendered for the purpose of terrorism; terrorist financing : it is not necessary that the offence is actually committed or that a link is established to a specific terrorist offence. The funds may come from a single source, e.g. as a loan or a gift which is provided to the traveller by a person or legal entity, or from various sources through some kind of collection organised by one or more persons or legal entities. other offences, such as aggravated theft, extortion and fraud to commit terrorist offences, and drawing up false administrative documents to committing a terrorist offence.
Aiding or abetting, inciting and attempting : Member States are required to criminalise aiding or abetting, inciting and attempting to commit a terrorist offence, such as providing the financial resources for the execution of a terrorist attack, to the provision of supportive services or material such as (means of) transportation, weapons, explosives or shelter. A person instigating another person to actively recruit others or to travel abroad for terrorist purposes would therefore be covered.
Protection of and assistance to victims of terrorism: the proposal sets out new rules complementing Directive 2012/29/EU on victims rights so that victims of terrorism have access to a long-term emotional and psychological support and assistance, whether legal, practical or financial, in the place where they live.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0701
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2021)0324
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0619
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2017/541
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 088 31.03.2017, p. 0006
- Draft final act: 00053/2016/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)156
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0046/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Specific opinion: PE597.753
- Debate in Council: 3508
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0228/2016
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE580.626
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE580.621
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0019/2016
- Debate in Council: 3455
- Committee draft report: PE577.046
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2015)0625
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE577.046
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0019/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE580.621
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE580.626
- Specific opinion: PE597.753
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)156
- Draft final act: 00053/2016/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0619 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0701 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0324
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
- Contribution: COM(2015)0625
Activities
- Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- Jan Philipp ALBRECHT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) DE
- Janice ATKINSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) PT
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) RO
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) HU
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (A8-0228/2016 - Monika Hohlmeier)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) SL
- Heinz K. BECKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) DE
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) NL
- Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) ES
- Mario BORGHEZIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) IT
- Frank ENGEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) FR
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) EL
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) FR
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) EL
- Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) ES
- Petr JEŽEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) PL
- Alexander Graf LAMBSDORFF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) RO
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) EL
- Angelika MLINAR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) DE
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) MT
- Péter NIEDERMÜLLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) HU
- James NICHOLSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate)
- Mirosław PIOTROWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) PL
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) FR
- Helga STEVENS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) NL
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) EL
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) DE
- Kristina WINBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) SV
- Steven WOOLFE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Combating terrorism (debate) PL
Votes
A8-0228/2016 - Monika Hohlmeier - Am 101 #
Amendments | Dossier |
383 |
2015/0281(COD)
2016/04/08
LIBE
191 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The offenses related to public provocation to commit a terrorist offence act comprise, inter alia, the glorification and justification of terrorism or the dissemination of messages or images including those related to the victims of terrorism as a way to gain publicity for the terrorists cause or seriously intimidating the population, provided that such behaviour causes a danger that terrorist acts may be committed. Websites containing public incitements to commit criminal acts of terrorism should be penalised accordingly.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The offenses related to public provocation to commit a terrorist offence act may comprise, inter alia, the
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The offenses related to public provocation to commit a terrorist offence act may comprise, inter alia, the glorification and justification of terrorism or the dissemination of messages or images including those related to the victims of terrorism as a way to gain publicity for the terrorists cause or seriously intimidating the population, provided that such behaviour causes a danger that terrorist acts may be committed. To strengthen action against public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, Member States may take measures to remove webpages publicly inciting to commit terrorist offences. Such measures should be taken after adequate control by the judicial authority, in order to guarantee their proportionality and the full respect of fundamental rights and procedural safeguards.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The most effective means of combatting terrorism on the Internet is to remove illegal terror content at source. Member States should use their best endeavours to cooperate with third countries in seeking to secure the removal of such content from servers within their territory. However when removal of illegal terror content at its source is not possible, Member States may put in place measures to block access from the Union's territory to Internet pages identified as containing or disseminating terrorist content. The measures undertaken by Member States in accordance with this Directive in order to remove or, where appropriate, block websites could be based on various types of public action, such as legislative, non-legislative, judicial or other. In that context, this Directive is without prejudice to voluntary action taken by the Internet industry to prevent the misuse of its services or to any support for such action by Member States. Member States should ensure that mechanisms to remove or block access to terror content take account of the rights of Internet Services Providers and of the end users and comply with existing legal and judicial procedures.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Where an information society service is provided that consists of the transmission in a communication network of information provided by a recipient of the service, or the provision of access to a communication network, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information transmitted, on condition that the provider does not initiate the transmission, does not select the receiver of the transmission, and does not select or modify the information contained in the transmission.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Considering the seriousness of the threat and the need to in particular stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, it is necessary to criminalise the travelling abroad for
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Considering the seriousness of the threat and the need to in particular stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, it is necessary to criminalise the travelling abroad for terrorist purposes, being not only the commission of terrorist offences and providing or receiving training but also to participate in the activities of a terrorist group. Any act of facilitation of such travel should also be criminalised. Member States should seek to create white lists for persons travelling for the purpose of providing humanitarian assistance.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Considering the seriousness of the threat and the need to in particular stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, it is necessary to criminalise the travelling abroad for terrorist purposes, being not only the commission of terrorist offences and providing or receiving training but also to participate in the activities of a terrorist group. Any act
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Considering the seriousness of the threat and the need to in particular stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, it is necessary to criminalise the travelling abroad for terrorist purposes, being not only the commission of terrorist offences and providing or receiving training but also to participate in the activities of a terrorist group. Any act of facilitation of such travel should also be criminalised. The act of travelling should be criminalised under very specific conditions and only when the intention of doing so for a terrorist purpose is proven by inferring from objective, factual circumstances.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Considering the seriousness of the threat and the need to in particular stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, it is necessary to criminalise the travelling abroad for terrorist purposes, being not only the commission of terrorist offences and providing or receiving training but also to participate in the activities of a terrorist group. Any act of facilitation of such travel should also be criminalised. Introduced rules and regulations in that matter should respect human rights obligation and should exclude any form of discrimination, as well as respect the principle of proportionality.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The criminalisation under this Directive is limited to the travel to countries outside the Union as the destination where the person concerned intends to engage in terrorist activities and offences. The travel to the State of destination may be direct or by transiting other States en route.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The Risk Analysis for 2016 published by Frontex stated that the Paris attacks of 13 November 2015 demonstrated that irregular migratory flows could be used by terrorists to enter the EU and pointed to a risk of terrorist infiltration by land and sea.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Criminalisation of the receiving training for terrorism complements the existing offence of providing training and specifically addresses the threats resulting from those actively preparing for the commission of terrorist offences, including those ultimately acting alone. This criminalisation should only cover active participation in the training; the mere fact of visiting websites containing information or receiving communications should not be covered.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Criminalisation of the receiving training for terrorism, including the acquisition of documentation, complements the existing offence of providing training and specifically addresses the threats resulting from those actively preparing for the commission of terrorist offences, including those ultimately acting alone.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Cybernetic attacks carried out for terrorist purposes or by a terrorist organisation should be punishable in the Member States.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Terrorist financing should be
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Terrorist financing should be punishable in the Member States and cover the financing of terrorist acts, the financing of a terrorist group, as well as other offences related to terrorist activities, such as the recruitment and training, or travel for terrorist purposes, with a view to disrupting the support structures facilitating the commission of terrorist offences. Aiding and abetting or attempting terrorist financing should also be punishable. Sanctions should be reviewed by an independent oversight body and any sanctions should be linked to a specific criminal offence, to avoid arbitrary decisions on the basis of national, religious, ethnical, or racial criteria.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Terrorist financing should be punishable in the Member States and cover the financing of terrorist acts, the financing of a terrorist group, as well as other offences related to terrorist activities, such as the recruitment and training, or travel for terrorist purposes, with a view to disrupting the support structures facilitating the commission of terrorist offences. Aiding and abetting or attempting terrorist financing should also be punishable. Sanctions should be reviewed by an independent oversight body and any sanctions should be linked to a specific criminal offence, to avoid arbitrary decisions on the basis of national, religious, ethnical, or racial criteria.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Given the increased convergence between organised crime and terrorism, fighting against organised crime networks should be part of any strategy in the fight against the financing of terrorism. Illicit trade in firearms, oil, drugs, cigarettes and counterfeit goods, trade in human beings, racketeering and extortion have become very lucrative ways for terrorist groups to obtain funding, generating around 110 billion euros every year (without trade in counterfeit goods). The attackers for both terrorist attacks in Paris in 2015 (Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan) had criminal records related to illicit trade in drugs and counterfeit goods.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Financial investigations may be fundamental in uncovering the facilitation of terrorist offences and the networks and schemes of terrorist organisations. Such investigations may be very productive, particularly when tax and customs authorities, financial intelligence units (FIUs) and judicial authorities are involved at an early stage of the investigation. Efforts conducted by the Member States aimed at preventing, investigating and combatting terrorist financing should make full use of Europol's financial intelligence and counter terrorist financing capabilities, including the Terrorist Financing Tracking Program (TFTP), FIU.Net, and teams responsible for operational support to Member States within anti-money laundering and asset recovery. Member States should endeavour to ensure a more efficient and coordinated approach aiming at establishing specialised units at national level to deal with financial investigations, including those related to the misuse of virtual currencies, into terrorism. Such a centralisation of expertise may have considerable added value and contribute substantially to securing successful prosecutions.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Financial investigations may be fundamental in uncovering the facilitation of terrorist offences and the networks and schemes of terrorist organisations. Such investigations may be very productive, particularly when tax and customs authorities, financial intelligence units (FIUs) and judicial authorities are involved at an early stage of the investigation. Member States should endeavour to ensure a more efficient and coordinated approach aiming at establishing specialised units at national level to deal with financial investigations into terrorism. Such a centralisation of expertise may have considerable added value and contribute substantially to securing successful prosecutions. In addition, cooperation between FIUs through the FIU.net platform should be strengthened.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Given the convergence or collaboration between organised crime and terrorist groups, fighting against organised crime should be part of any strategy in the fight against the financing of terrorism.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Given the convergence between organised crime and terrorist groups, fighting against organised crime should be part of any strategy in the fight against the financing of terrorism.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 b (new) (10b) The trade in goods in the fields of organised crime or other commercial activities have become a lucrative source of funding for terrorist organisations. Due diligence, monitoring and reporting requirements incumbent on private economic actors engaged in the trading in goods whose trading is considered to be vulnerable to terrorist financing take early effect at the transactional stages. They have a preventative effect by materially impairing the trading activities of organised criminal groups and terrorist groups as a source of terrorist financing. Reporting duties to competent bodies of the Member States and a coordinated cooperation between authorities at national and EU-level are suitable to generate additional knowledge to help tracking and prosecuting organised crime and other commercial activities of terrorist organisations more effectively.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) The provision of material concrete support and assistance for terrorists by supplying of goods and engaging in other commercial trade transactions and the further development of the criminalisation of terrorist financing in relation to those activities should be taken in parallel with due diligence, monitoring and reporting requirements applicable to private economic actors engaged in trading in designated goods whose trading is considered to be vulnerable to terrorist financing.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In seeking to halt terrorist financing Member States should also address the processes that generate funding for terrorist organisations, such as the trafficking of arms, oil and artworks. Member States should not allow arms to be sold to countries that fund terrorist organisations, but should instead invest in increasing their own energy independence, including through the use of renewable energies, so as to cut off the flow of resources to terrorists and to governments which, through complicity or connivance, aid and abet them.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 b (new) (11b) Furthermore the development of malware to be exclusively used for the purpose of terrorist or serious criminal activities or to the benefit of terrorist groups should be punishable in the Member States.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The attempt to
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The attempt to travel abroad for terrorist purposes, should be punishable, as well as the attempt to provide training
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The attempt to travel
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) With regard to the criminal offences
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) With regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, the notion of intention must apply to all the elements constituting those offences. The intentional nature of an act or omission may be inferred from
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) With regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, the notion of intention must apply to all the elements constituting those offences. The intentional nature of an act or omission
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) With regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, the notion of intention must apply to all the elements constituting those offences. The intentional nature of an act or omission
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) With regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, the notion of intention must apply to all the elements constituting those offences. The intentional nature of an act or omission
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13a) For the offences related to terrorism as set out in this Directive to be punishable, there should always be a link between these offences and a terrorist group or terrorist offence.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14)
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Prompt and effective sharing of relevant information and data Member States obtained from EU-wide databases is an effective tool in anti-terrorism investigations. Member States should therefore take the steps required in order to make judicial and police cooperation compulsory within the EU, using the dedicated structures and channels put in place by the relevant European agencies.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) Jurisdictional rules should be established to ensure that
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) Jurisdictional rules should be established to ensure that the terrorist offence may be effectively prosecuted and convicted. In particular, it appears necessary to establish jurisdiction for the offences committed by
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) Member States should provide for sentence reductions or protection programmes for any members of terrorist organisations who disassociate themselves from those organisations and seek to ensure that their criminal activities do not lead any further or give practical assistance to police and judicial authorities in gathering evidence leading to the identification or capture of other members of the organisations.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) Furthermore, National Authorities should ensure that all suspects under custody in their Member States be put into a regime of isolation from other inmates. This regime would support efforts to prevent radicalisation in prisons.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) In order to prevent and combat terrorism, a closer cross-border cooperation among the competent national and European authorities is needed with regard to expedient exchange of any relevant information from criminal records or other available sources and in particular on individuals who are or have been subject to criminal proceedings or asset freezing.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The Internet plays an essential role in promoting values of peace, tolerance and solidarity as well as promoting and protecting Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within and outside the European Union.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) To ensure the success of investigations and prosecution of terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities, those responsible for investigating and prosecuting such offences shall have the possibility to make use of effective investigative tools such as those used in combating organised crime and other serious crimes. Such tools should be proportionate to the nature and gravity of the offences under investigation. In order to ensure the respect of the fundamental rights and freedom and the presumption of innocence and effective procedural safeguards, the use of such investigative tools should always be subject to the control of a judicial authority, and mass surveillance should never be allowed. Every individual should dispose of effective remedies to challenge any violation of his fundamental rights.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) Terrorist crimes can be considered as crimes against humanity, as they are considered to be the most serious crimes under international humanitarian law and are already regarded under secondary legislation as non-lapsable actions. Therefore, terrorist offences should not be subject to any statute of limitations.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) Considering that terrorist organisations rely heavily upon various electronic tools, the internet and social media to communicate, promote, and incite terrorist acts, to recruit potential fighters, to collect funds, or to arrange for other support for their activities, the issues related to electronic evidence create challenges in investigations and prosecutions of terrorist offences. Member States should therefore cooperate among each other, notably through Eurojust and Europol, to ensure a coordinated approach for the development of any measure that may prove efficient in dealing with the gathering, sharing, and admissibility of electronic evidence.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) whereas, with a view to preventing and combating terrorism, closer cross- border cooperation is needed between the competent national and European authorities, so that relevant information from criminal records or other sources can be exchanged rapidly concerning radicalised persons, particularly persons who have been prosecuted or whose assets have been frozen; whereas, in order to prevent and combat terrorism, it is also necessary for national and European authorities and third countries to exchange accurate and adequate information about persons who have been denied admission to the territory of a Member State or third country or been deported on suspicion of involvement in crimes as referred to in this Directive.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) (15b) In order to prevent and combat terrorism, a closer cross-border cooperation among the competent national authorities is needed with regard to timely exchange of relevant information from court records or other available sources on detainees and persons who are or have been subject to criminal proceedings or assets freezing.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) (15b) In order to prevent and combat terrorism, a closer cross-border cooperation among the competent national and European authorities is needed with regard to expedient exchange of any relevant information from criminal records or other available sources on individuals who are suspects of a criminal offence or have been subject to criminal proceedings or asset freezing. This provision is without prejudice to the [Data Protection Directive (Directive (EU) 2016/... of the European Parliament and of the Council of ...on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA)].
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) (15b) Member States should support programmes to prevent radicalisation, involving measures such as information campaigns and the development of alternative narratives to counter terrorist propaganda, and should involve civil society groups, relevant local communities and other stakeholders in devising strategies to guard against radicalisation, recruitment and violent extremism.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) (15b) Member States have various existing information sharing mechanisms and analysis files at their disposal which are provided by Interpol as well as by Europol and other authorities and agencies of the Union. Member States and their law enforcement authorities should increase their utilisation of these systems and databases, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, to enhance their prevention and counter-terrorism capabilities by sharing and retrieving information and by conducting systematic strategic and operational analyses in accordance with applicable legal requirements and limits.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 c (new) (15c) Member States should cooperate among each other, notably through Eurojust, to ensure a coordinated approach for the development of necessary, proportionate and effective measures in dealing with the gathering, sharing, and admissibility of electronic evidence, in compliance with the [Data Protection Directive (Directive (EU) 2016/... of the European Parliament and of the Council of ...on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA)].
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 c (new) (15c) The European institutions and Member States should introduce economic and social policies geared to fostering integration and combating poverty, social exclusion and all other factors that can fuel radicalism and extremism.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 c (new) (15c) A Eurojust report of November 20141a notes that the challenges of gathering and analysis of electronic evidence are twofold: (1) Dealing with the abuse of encryption and anonymity especially in relation to attribution (e.g. the growing sophistication and wider use of anonymisers, proxy servers, Tor and other anonymity networks, satellite links and foreign 3G networks make it difficult to associate an IP address with criminal activity). (2) Dealing with the legal and technical obstacles in relation to data being stored in the cloud.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member States should ensure that the position of the victims of terrorism is adequately recognised before, during and after criminal proceedings and should adopt specific measures of protection, support and assistance, with respectful and fair treatment of the victim, responding to the specific needs of victims of terrorism, further qualifying and deepening the rights already contained in the Directive 2012/29/EU of the
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member State should adopt
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member State should adopt specific measures of protection, support and assistance responding to the specific needs of victims of terrorism, further qualifying and deepening the rights already contained in the Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and the Council28 . Victims of terrorism are those defined in Article 1 of the Directive 2012/29/EU, in relation to terrorist offences as referred to in Article 3. The measures to be taken by Member States should ensure that in the event of a terrorist attack, the victims of
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member State should adopt specific measures of protection, support and assistance responding to the specific needs of victims of terrorism, further qualifying and deepening the rights already contained in the Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and the Council28 . Victims of terrorism are those defined in Article 1 of the Directive 2012/29/EU, in relation to terrorist offences as referred to in Article 3. The measures to be taken by Member States should ensure that in the event of a terrorist attack, the victims of terrorism will obtain emotional and psychological support, including trauma support and counselling, and any relevant legal, practical or financial information and advice. Furthermore, each member States shall take into account the risks of intimidation and retaliation to victims and, generally speaking, to persons who may give testimony in criminal proceedings relating to terrorist offences. __________________ 28 Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001(OJ L 315, 14.11.2012 p. 37).
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Member States affected by terrorism should set up the creation and development of a one-stop shop for information and advice for victims of terrorism, not merely to meet victims' needs on acquiring information and advice, but also to provide victims with psychological first aid and referral possibilities, and where appropriate to play a central role in communicating with press.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 b (new) (16b) Member States need, in full respect of freedom of expression, engage with media and journalists to adopt measures of auto-regulation in the aftermath of a terror attack in order to guarantee the protection of the private life of victims and their family members and in addition recognise the value of cooperating with specialised services for victims assistance and support in helping victims to deal with the media attention they receive.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 c (new) (16c) Member States should adopt appropriate measures to avoid, in the matter of possible, an attack on the private life of the victim and the family members, in particular related to investigative activity and during legal procedures.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 d (new) (16d) Given that the recent deadly militant attacks in Brussels fuels concern that terror groups such as Islamic State could eventually target nuclear plants and develop radioactive "dirty bombs" while underlining that much of the world's plutonium and enriched uranium remains vulnerable to theft, Member States should impose safety measures to protect citizens against biochemical terror attacks.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 e (new) (16e) Victims of terrorism have suffered attacks that are intended ultimately to harm society or a larger group they represent. They therefore need special attention, support and social recognition due to the particular nature of the crime that has been committed against them.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 f (new) (16f) Victim support groups encompass the needs of victims, amongst their legal support, into four necessities: the right to justice, dignity, truth and memory, by which the later stands for rebuking terrorism unconditionally.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 g (new) (16g) Member States should encourage specific training for persons responsible for assisting victims or terrorist acts, as well as granting the necessary resources to that effect.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 h (new) (16h) In a considerable number of cases the victim is also the most important witness in the trail and needs to be protected from possible retaliatory or threatening behaviour from the offender; therefore the need for security should be extended to include prevention of repeat or secondary victimisation.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Member States should co-operate among each-other to ensure that access to information about the victims' rights,
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Repressive measures should be complemented by long-term policies to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment by terrorist organisations. Strategies on social inclusion, education, local support for families and policies tackling discrimination and exclusion to stop vulnerable individuals joining violent extremist organisations, as well as the provision of effective exit-programmes and exit-strategies, are crucial to countering terrorism and to promote deradicalisation.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) A comprehensive policy to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment of citizens of the Union by terrorist organisations can only be successfully put in place if accompanied by long-term proactive de-radicalisation processes in the judicial sphere. Strategies on social inclusion, education, employment and housing and policies tackling discrimination and exclusion to stop vulnerable individuals joining violent extremist organisations are crucial to countering terrorism. Member States should therefore share good practices on the setting-up of de-radicalisation structures and their judicial approach in this regard notably through Eurojust. They should share such good practices not only among each other but also with third countries which have already acquired experience and achieved positive results in this area.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Repressive measures should be complemented by long-term policies to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment by terrorist organisations. Strategies on social inclusion, education, and policies tackling discrimination and exclusion to stop vulnerable individuals joining violent extremist organisations, as well as the provision of effective exit-programmes and exit-strategies, are crucial to countering terrorism.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Punitive sanctions should be complemented by long-term policies to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment of citizens of the Union by terrorist organisations. Strategies on social inclusion, education, employment and housing and policies tackling discrimination and exclusion to stop vulnerable individuals joining violent extremist organisations are crucial to countering terrorism. Member States should also share good practices on the setting-up of de-radicalisation structures to prevent citizens of the Union and third- country nationals legally residing in the Union from leaving the Union or to control their return to it and their judicial approach in this regard notably through Eurojust. They should share such good practices not only among each other but also with third countries which have already acquired experience and achieved positive results in this area.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Punitive sanctions should be complemented by long-term policies to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment of citizens of the Union by terrorist organisations. Strategies on social inclusion, education, employment and housing and policies tackling discrimination and exclusion to stop vulnerable individuals joining violent extremist organisations are crucial to countering terrorism. Member States should also share good practices on the setting-up of de-radicalisation structures to prevent citizens of the Union and third- country nationals legally residing in the Union from leaving the Union or to control their return to it and their judicial approach in this regard notably through Eurojust. They should share such good practices not only among each other but also with third countries which have already acquired experience and achieved positive results in this area.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Member States should assure that, if the victim does not reside in the Member State where the act of terrorism took place, this Member State should cooperate with the Member State of residence in order to facilitate assistance for the victim.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Improved cooperation between Member States in combating terrorism must also involve intensive exchanges and cooperation between their judicial authorities and with Eurojust. The resources of Eurojust's Coordination Centre, which should play a critical role in promoting joint actions on the part of Member States’ judicial authorities as regards the collection of evidence, should be strengthened. More use should therefore be made of the Joint Investigation Teams instrument, both among Member States and between Member States and third countries with which Eurojust has established cooperation agreements.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 b (new) (17b) Member States should ensure that all foreign fighters are placed under judicial supervision and, where necessary, in administrative detention upon their return to Europe, until such time as the legal proceedings required have been initiated.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Given that the objectives of this Directive cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States unilaterally and can therefore, be
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 a (new) (18a) The fight against terrorism is an integral and global reaching effort that demands an international answer, thus giving the Union the obligation to act in cooperation with third countries.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) This Directive
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) This Directive respects the principles recognised by Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union, respects fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including those set out in Chapters II, III, V and VI thereof which encompass inter alia the right to liberty and security, freedom of expression and
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) This Directive respects the principles recognised by Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union, respects fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including those set out in Chapters II, III, V and VI thereof which encompass inter alia the right to liberty and security, freedom of expression
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) This Directive
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) This Directive respects the principles recognised by Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union, respects fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including those set out in Chapters II, III, V and VI thereof which encompass inter alia the right to liberty and security, freedom of expression
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) This Directive should respect
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the Union acquis on procedural rights.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic, journalistic or reporting purposes. The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions falls outside the scope of this Directive and in particular of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences.
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) The implementation of this Directive should be accompanied by simultaneous measures, support programmes and awareness-raising campaigns in order to prevent radicalisation, with special focus on women and girls that should be included as they are increasingly being radicalised and recruited by terrorist organisations. Particular attention should also be given to the active role of women in both prevention and deradicalisation process;
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) The implementation of
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) The implementation of
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) The implementation of
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) The implementation of the criminalisation under this Directive should be proportional to the nature and circumstances of the offence and of each case, with respect to the legitimate aims pursued and to their necessity in a democratic society, and should exclude any form of arbitrariness or discrimination.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 a (new) (20a) The Internet plays an essential role in promoting values of peace, tolerance and solidarity as well as promoting and protecting Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within and outside the European Union.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Th
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) (21a) Sanctions in the area of terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities should in no circumstances be used by Member States as a ground to circumvent their international obligations under the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 a (new) (23a) In the implementation of this Directive, Member States should ensure that criminalisation is proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and necessary in a democratic society. This Directive should not result in arbitrary decisions or in discriminatory policies and practices based on perceived nationality, religion, ethnic or racial origin. This Directive should not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction of their obligation to respect fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union nor the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 b (new) (23b) This Directive should not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures which could result in direct or indirect discrimination or which would be based on religious practice and ethnic criteria.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities, as well as specific measures of protection of and assistance and support to victims of terrorism.
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 a (new) Article 1 a Human rights and fundamental principles 1. Member States shall ensure that the implementation of this Directive is carried out while respecting human rights obligations, in particular the freedom of movement, freedom of expression and information, freedom of association and freedom of thought, conscience and religion as set forth in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other obligations under international law. 2. Member States are not required to take measures in contradiction of constitutional rules relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability. 3. The establishment, implementation and application of the criminalisation under this Directive should furthermore be subject to the principle of proportionality, with respect to the legitimate aims pursued and to their necessity in a democratic society, and should exclude any form of arbitrariness or discriminatory or racist treatment. 4. Nothing in this Directive shall affect rights, obligations and responsibilities of a Member State and individuals under international law, including international humanitarian law. The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by that law, are not governed by this Directive, and the activities undertaken by military forces of a Member State in the exercise of their official duties, inasmuch as they are governed by other rules of international law, are not governed by this Directive.
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) "funds" means assets of every kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable, however acquired, and legal documents or instruments in any form, including electronic or digital, evidencing title to, or interest in, such assets, including, but not limited to, bank credits, travellers cheques, bank cheques, money orders, shares, securities, bonds, drafts, letters of credit, and virtual currencies,
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "terrorist group" shall mean: a structured group of more than two persons, established over a significant period of time and acting in concert to commit various terrorist offences
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "terrorist group" shall mean: a structured group of
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Structured group" shall mean a group that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of an offence and that does not need to have formally defined
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Structured group" shall mean a group that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of an offence and that does not need to have formally defined roles for its members
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Structured group" shall mean a group that have the purpose and the potential of committing various terrorist offences, that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of an offence and that does not need to have formally defined roles for its members, continuity of its membership or a developed structure.
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) "Victim" means: (i) a natural person who has suffered harm, including physical, mental or emotional harm or economic loss which was directly caused by a criminal offence; (ii) family members of a person whose death was directly caused by a criminal offence and who have suffered harm as a result of that person's death;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) "Family members" means the spouse, the person who is living with the victim in a committed intimate relationship, in a joint household and on a stable and continuous basis, the relatives in direct line, the siblings and the dependants of the victim:
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional acts referred to in paragraph 2, when posing a real threat to life or of serious injury, as defined as offences under national law, which, given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation are defined as terrorist offences where committed with the aim of one or more of the following:
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) seriously intimidating a group of people or population;
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) u
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) u
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) u
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) u
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) u
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) u
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) seriously destabilising or destroying the
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) seriously destabilising or destroying or attempting to destabilise and/or destroy the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) Attacks upon a persons' life which may cause death or injury;
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person, including rape, sexual assault, trafficking and slavery of women and girls which often leads to death, and manipulation of women and girls in order to mislead them to travel to conflict areas outside the Union or joining terroristic activities;
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) attacks upon the physical and psychological integrity of a person;
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including an information system, a fixed platform located on the continental shelf, a public place or private property
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of radiological, nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons;
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons;
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point g (g) release, or threatened release, of dangerous substances, including radiological or biological material, or causing fires, floods or explosions, the effect of which is to endanger human life or to cause widespread fear and alarm;
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) interfering with or disrupting the supply of water, power or any other fundamental natural resource through cybernetic or other forms of attack the effect of which is to endanger human life;
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new) (ha) cyber-attacks such as hostile actions directed against network and information systems, which are either critical infrastructures and whose incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, economic security, public health or safety, or any combination thereof, or other network and information systems that are essential for the functioning of other infrastructures of the state (e.g. air, rail, or road transportation infrastructure, energy, gas, oil or water supply systems, medical services, financial and banking system, etc.)
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i (i) seriously threatening to commit any of the acts
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i (i) seriously threatening to commit any of the acts listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i (i) seriously threatening to commit any of the acts listed in points (a) to (h), on the basis of objective, factual circumstances.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i (i) seriously threatening to commit any of the acts listed in points (a) to (h), where the threat has been accompanied by physical manifestations of the threat.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new) (ia) attacks against information systems as defined in articles 3 to 7 of Directive 2013/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 on attacks against information systems and replacing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Nothing in the present Directive should be construed to affect in any way other rights, obligations and responsibilities Member States and individuals have under international law, including international humanitarian law and international criminal law.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following acts, when committed intentionally and unlawfully, are punishable as a criminal offence:
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) participating in the activities of a terrorist group,
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) participating in the activities of a terrorist group, including by supplying information or material resources, or by funding its activities in any way, with knowledge of the fact that such participation will contribute to the criminal activities of the terrorist group, whether these activities take place within a Member State or another country.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) voluntarily participating in the activities of a terrorist group, including by supplying information or material resources, or by funding its activities
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) The provision of humanitarian activities by internationally recognised humanitarian organizations shall not be considered as contributing to the criminal activities of the terrorist groups.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that the provision of humanitarian assistance by impartial humanitarian organisations recognised by international humanitarian law shall not be considered as participating in the activities of a terrorist group.
Amendment 56 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the UN Security Council Resolutions 2195 (2014), 2199 (2015) and 2253 (2015)
Amendment 57 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 b (new) - having regard to UN Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001)
Amendment 58 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the Communique of the Nuclear Security Summit, Washington, 1 April 2016
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The European Union is founded on the universal values of human dignity, freedom, equality between women and men and solidarity, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It is based on the principle of democracy and the principle of the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Acts of terrorism constitute one of the most serious violations of security and of the universal values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity, enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms on which the European Union is founded. It also represents one of the most serious attacks on democracy and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States and on which the European Union is based.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The fight against terrorism and prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations are concepts that necessarily need to go hand in hand because of their complex nature.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The United Nations (UN), Interpol and Europol have been reporting for years on the increasing convergence between organised crime and terrorism. Europol's latest Terrorism Situation and Trend Report concludes that the overall threat by terrorists to the security of citizens of the Union and interests is likely to increase and has been particularly exacerbated by the conflict in Syria and Iraq, while the nexus between terrorism and organised crime and the links between criminal and terrorist groups constitute an increased security threat to the Union. Member States should, therefore, ensure that the financing and the support of terrorist crimes by means of organised crime is made punishable and that the interlinks of organised crime and terrorist activities and terrorist financing are considered more strongly by authorities of the Member States involved in criminal proceedings.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2178 (2014) on threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts adopted on 24 September 2014 sets out a set of measures to combat the phenomenon of the Foreign Terrorist Fighters and requires to establish in the national laws of the Member States of the UN penalisation as serious criminal offences: travel or attempted travel to a third country with the purpose of contributing to the commission of terrorist acts or to providing or receiving of training; the funding of such travel and the organisation or facilitation of such travel.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Punitive sanctions should be complemented by long-term policies to prevent the radicalisation and recruitment of citizens of the Union by terrorist organisations. Strategies on social inclusion, education, employment and housing and policies tackling discrimination and exclusion to stop vulnerable individuals joining violent extremist organisations are crucial to countering terrorism.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) An Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the prevention of terrorism adopted in May 2015 introduced a requirement of criminalisation of participation in an association or group for the purpose of terrorism, receiving training for terrorism, travelling or attempting to travel for terrorist purposes, providing or collecting funds for such travels and organising and facilitating such travels. The Union signed the Additional Protocol as well as the Convention on 22 October 2015.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) Member States should share good practices on the setting-up of de- radicalisation structures to prevent citizens of the Union and third-country nationals legally residing in the Union from leaving the Union or to control their return to it and their judicial approach in this regard notably through Eurojust. They should share such good practices not only among each other but also with third countries which have already acquired experience and achieved positive results in this area.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years. I
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years. Individuals referred to as "foreign terrorist fighters" travel abroad for terrorism purposes. Returning foreign terrorist fighters pose a heightened security threat to all EU Member States. Foreign terrorist fighters have been linked to several recent attacks or plots, including the attacks in Paris on 13 November 2015 and in Brussels on the 22nd of March 2016. In addition, the European Union and its Member States face increased threats from individuals inspired or instructed by terrorist groups abroad but who remain within Europe.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years. Individuals referred to as "foreign terrorist fighters" travel abroad for terrorism purposes. Returning foreign terrorist fighters pose a heightened security threat to all EU Member States. Foreign terrorist fighters who are nationals of Member States or third countries and who sometimes have dual nationality have been linked to several recent attacks or plots, including the attacks in Paris on 13 November 2015 and in Brussels on 22 March 2016. In addition, the European Union and its Member States face increased threats from individuals inspired or instructed by terrorist groups abroad or in Europe but who remain within Europe.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years. Individuals referred to as "foreign terrorist fighters" travel abroad for terrorism purposes. Returning foreign terrorist fighters pose a heightened security threat to all EU Member States. Foreign terrorist fighters have been linked to several recent attacks or plots, including the attacks in Paris on
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years. Individuals referred to as "foreign terrorist fighters" travel abroad for terrorism purposes. Returning foreign terrorist fighters pose a heightened security threat to all EU Member States.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Considering that the internet is being used for terrorist propaganda and recruitment, Member States should take appropriate measures for flagging illegal content on the internet and facilitating the detection of such content, and cooperate with each other, with Europol and other relevant Union agencies, as well as with civil society organisations active in this field.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) A harmonised classification of criminal sanctions in terrorist crimes would offer a common legal framework which could be used as a reference to several Union agencies. To that effect, effective coordinating mechanism between Europol, Eurojust, SIS, OLAF and EJN should be put in place.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Member States should strengthen the professionalism of security forces, law enforcement agencies and justice institutions; and ensure effective oversight and accountability of such bodies, in conformity with international human rights law and the rule of law. This includes human rights training to security forces including on how to respect human rights within the context of measures taken to counter violent extremism and terrorism.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Certain forms of internet use can be conducive to radicalisation, enabling fanatics throughout the world to connect with each other and recruit vulnerable individuals without any physical contact whatsoever and in a manner that is difficult to trace. The internet generates specific challenges given its global and cross-border nature, thus giving rise to legal gaps and jurisdictional conflicts. Every Member State should set up a special unit tasked with detecting and signalling illegal content on the internet and with facilitating the detection, blocking and removal of such content. The creation by Europol of the Internet Referral Unit (IRU), responsible for detecting illegal content and supporting Member States in this regard, while fully respecting the fundamental rights of all parties involved, represents a significant step forward in this regard. Member States' units should also cooperate with the Union counter terrorism coordinator and the European Counter Terrorist Centre within Europol, as well as with civil society organisations active in this field. Member States should enforce cooperation with each other and with the relevant Union agencies on these matters.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Member States should strengthen the professionalism of security forces, law enforcement agencies and justice institutions; and ensure effective oversight and accountability of such bodies, in conformity with international human rights law and the rule of law. This includes human rights training to security forces including on how to respect human rights within the context of measures taken to counter violent extremism and terrorism.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The fight against terrorism remains primarily a Member State matter. However, the terrorist attacks in Europe in 2015 and 2016 have highlighted the need for coordinated action on the part of the EU Member States to combat terrorism and address the threat which foreign fighters pose within the EU.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Considering that the internet is being used for terrorist propaganda and recruitment, Member State should take appropriate measures for flagging illegal content on the internet and facilitating the detection of such content, and cooperate with each other, with Europol, namely by providing information on suspicious individuals or organisations to Europol's databases SIENA and EIS and to the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, and other relevant Union agencies, as well as with civil society organisations active in this field.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) A greater coordination between Europol and Eurojust as a complement of the mandatory exchange of information between several intelligence agencies of the Member States, aiming at improving the collaboration and trust between them.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 c (new) (4c) Is urgent to strengthen the EU INTCEN to turn it into a true European Intelligence Agency that possess enough instruments and resources to act effectively in a European scale.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Taking account of the evolution of terrorist threats and legal obligations to the Union and Member States under international law, the definition of terrorist offences, including offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities, should be further approximated in all Member States, so that it covers more comprehensively conduct related to in particular foreign terrorist fighters and terrorist financing.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Taking account of the evolution of terrorist threats and legal obligations to the Union and Member States under international law, the definition of terrorist offences,
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Taking account of the evolution of terrorist threats and legal obligations to the Union and Member States under international law, the definition of terrorist offences,
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Taking account of the evolution of terrorist threats and legal obligations to the Union and Member States under
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Taking account of the evolution of terrorist threats and legal obligations to the Union and Member States under international law, the definition of terrorist offences, including offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities, should be further approximated in all Member States, so that it covers more comprehensively conduct related to in particular foreign terrorist fighters and terrorist financing.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The threat of nuclear and radiological terrorism remains one of the greatest challenges to international security and this threat is constantly evolving. Countering the threat demands strengthened international cooperation and increased support particularly for the central role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The internet poses specific challenges by virtue of its global and cross-border nature, which can give rise to legal vacuums and jurisdictional conflicts and make it possible for recruiters and radicalised individuals to communicate remotely and easily from all corners of the world without the need to cross physical borders, establish a base or seek sanctuary in a particular country.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Nothing in this directive shall have the effect of altering the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the Member States, humanitarian organisations and individuals under international law. The activities of parties to armed conflict, which are governed by international humanitarian law within the meaning of these terms under that law, and, inasmuch as they are governed by other rules of international law, are not governed by this Directive. Humanitarian activities carried out by impartial humanitarian organisations internationally recognised should not be considered as contributing to the criminal activities of terrorist groups.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) (5b) Certain forms of internet use, and the use of certain applications which provide the basis for other forms of communication, are conducive to radicalisation and to the development and organisation of terrorist networks, enabling fanatics throughout the world to connect with each other and recruit vulnerable individuals without any need for physical contact and in a manner that is difficult to trace.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 c (new) (5c) Each Member State should set up a special unit tasked with flagging illegal content on the internet and with facilitating the detection and removal of such content, on the basis of cooperation with the Internet Referral Unit set up within Europol. The framing, in a manner consistent with fundamental rights and freedom of expression, of an effective strategy for the detection and removal of illegal content which acts as an incitement to violence is essential, as is the dissemination of effective arguments to counter terrorist propaganda.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 d (new) (5d) Internet and social media companies and service providers have a legal responsibility to cooperate with Member State authorities by deleting any illegal content that propagates violent extremism, as quickly as possible and in a manner entirely consistent with the rule of law and fundamental rights, including freedom of expression. Member States should consider legal action, including criminal prosecutions, against internet and social media companies and service providers which refuse to comply with an administrative or judicial request to delete from their internet platforms illegal content or content extolling terrorism. The refusal or deliberate failure by internet platforms to cooperate, thus allowing such illegal content to circulate, should be regarded as an act of complicity that can be equated to criminal intent or neglect and in such cases those responsible should be brought to justice.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The offences related to terrorist activities are of a very serious nature as they have the potential to lead to the commission of terrorist offences and enable terrorists and terrorist groups to maintain and further develop their criminal activities
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The provision of bona fide humanitarian assistance by impartial and independent humanitarian non- governmental organisations recognised by international law such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) should not be considered as contributing to the criminal activities of a terrorist group. However, as established by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Note 1a), the applicability of international humanitarian law to a situation of armed conflict and to acts committed in that context does not exclude the application of laws on the prevention of terrorism to such "armed conflicts". ____________________ Note 1a: Judgement of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 16 October 2014, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union. Joint cases T-208/11 and T-508/11.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The provision of humanitarian assistance by impartial humanitarian organisations recognised by international humanitarian law such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) should not be considered as contributing to the criminal activities of a terrorist group.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Measures designed to combat terrorism will not be fully effective until they are accompanied by an effective, dissuasive and coordinated set of criminal justice measures implemented in all Member States. By criminalising terrorist acts carried out abroad with terrorist organisations, Member States will equip themselves with the tools needed to address the terrorist radicalisation of EU citizens and the phenomenon of foreign fighters. Law enforcement and judicial authorities should have the resources needed to prevent, detect and punish such acts. Their staff should receive ongoing effective training in dealing with terrorism-related crimes.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The criminalisation of offences covered by this Directive must be contingent on observance of the principle of materiality, which requires conduct to have an external manifestation if it is to be deemed damaging or a threat to the interest being protected.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) (6b) This Directive covers acts which are considered by all Member States as serious infringements of their criminal laws committed by individuals whose objectives constitute a threat to their democratic societies respecting the rule of law and the civilisation upon which these societies are founded. It has to be understood in this sense and cannot be construed so as to argue that the conduct of those who have acted in the interest of preserving or restoring these democratic values, as was notably the case in some Member States during the Second World War, could now be considered as "terrorist" acts. Nor can it be construed so as to incriminate on terrorist grounds persons exercising their fundamental right to manifest their opinions, even if in the course of the exercise of such right they commit offences, or persons or groups conducting attacks against the military and military infrastructure of dictatorial regimes. Similarly, incitement to attacks against the military infrastructure of dictatorial regimes, and glorification of such attacks, should not be covered by this Directive.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 source: 580.621
2016/04/12
LIBE
192 amendments...
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 a (new) Article 4a Humanitarian organisations Humanitarian activities undertaken by internationally recognised humanitarian organisations shall not be considered as contributing to the criminal activities of the terrorist groups.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), where such conduct, whether or not directly advocating the commission of a terrorist offence
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available by any means, including the internet, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite, including glorifying, the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (ha) of Article 3(2), where such conduct, whether
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission or encourage the preparation or instigation of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), where such conduct, whether or not directly advocating terrorist offences, causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, online display or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), where such conduct, whether or not directly advocating terrorist offences, causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), where such conduct, whether directly or not directly (including glorifying of acts of terrorism) advocating terrorist offences, causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional distribution, or otherwise making available
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes. The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions falls outside the scope of this Directive and in particular of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new) Article 5a Fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression 1. This Directive shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction to fundamental rights and principles, especially those relating to freedom of thought and expression, in particular for the press and other media, as they result from fundamental principles governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability. 2. Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes. The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Directive and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new) Article 5a Measures against websites publicly glorifying terrorist offences In case of glorification or public justification of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), the competent judicial authority shall order the withdrawal of the content.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 b (new) Article 5b Aggravating circumstances Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that it is regarded as an aggravating circumstance when a criminal offence referred to in Articles 6 or 7 is committed directed to vulnerable natural persons, including children.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that soliciting another
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that soliciting another person to commit one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), or in Article 4 by any means, including Internet, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that soliciting another person to commit or contribute to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), or in Article 4 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that soliciting another person to commit one of the offences listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that carrying out activities which entail discrediting, disparaging, or the humiliation of victims of terrorist offences, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or meaningfully contributing to one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), knowing that the skills provided are intended to be used for this purpose, where the provision of instructions manifestly causes a clear and imminent danger that one or more such offences may be committed, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to one of the offences listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – title Receiving and acquiring training for terrorism
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to receive instruction, from another person in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally. Member States shall also take the necessary measures to ensure that the 'self-study' of the same techniques and methods is also punishable as a criminal offence when the offences listed are committed intentionally.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to wilfully receive instruction, from another person, including on obtaining knowledge or practical skills, in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques,
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to receive practical instruction, from another person in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to wilfully receive instruction, from another person in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2), where the reception of instructions manifestly causes a clear and imminent danger that one or more such offences may be committed, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to receive instruction, from another person or to obtain documentation giving instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to receive instruction, from another person in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that to receive instruction, from another person in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, development of malware to be exclusively used for a terrorist purpose or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing of or contributing to the commission of one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) is punishable as a criminal
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that mere fact of visiting websites containing information or receiving communications, which could be used for training for terrorism, is not in itself sufficient to commit the offence of receiving training for terrorism.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – title Travelling abroad for the purpose of terrorism
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that travelling to another country either within or outside the Union for the purpose of the commission of or contribution to a terrorist offence referred to in Article 3, the participation in the activities of a terrorist group referred to in Article 4 or the providing or receiving of training for terrorism referred to in Articles 7 and 8 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that travelling to a
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the act of travelling to another country
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to establish a list, including foreign fighters, terrorists, terrorist groups, people involved in recruiting and radicalisation. Member State shall update and insert their lists into SIS to make them available to all the other Member States and share them with Europol via protected and secured systems.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that the defendant does not in any circumstances bear the burden of proof in establishing that his or her travel to another country is for a legitimate purpose.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall strengthen the timely exchange of any available relevant information concerning persons travelling abroad for the purpose of terrorism. For that purpose, each Member state shall designate a point of contact available on a 24/7 basis. A Member state can choose to designate an already existing point of contact. This point of contact shall have the capacity to carry out communications with the point of contact of another Member State on an expedited basis;
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – title Organising or
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any act of organis
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 a (new) Article 10a Violent radicalisation The Commission shall support local and regional authorities in developing local and regional prevention strategies to counter violent radicalisation. The Commission shall also collect and publish a handbook for local and regional authorities with a collection of best practises in combating violent radicalisation.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any person providing or collecting funds, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intention that they
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intent that they should be used
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intent that they should be used, or knowing that they are to be used, in full or in part, to commit any of the offence(s) referred to in Articles 3 to
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds or other financial assets, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intent that they should be used, or knowing that they are to be used, in full or in part, to commit any of the offence(s) referred to in Articles 3 to 10 and 12 to 14c or 16 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally. This shall specifically include the provision or collection of funds or other financial assets derived from forms of organised crime.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds and value, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intent that they should be used, or knowing that they are to be used, in full or in part, to commit any of the offence(s) referred to in Articles 3 to 10 and 12 to 14 or 16 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intent that they should be used, or knowing that they are to be used, in full or in part, to commit any of the offence(s) referred to in Articles 3 to
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds, by any means, directly or
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that providing or collecting funds, by any means, directly or indirectly, with the intent that they should be used, or knowing that they are to be used, in full or in part, to commit any of the offence(s) referred to in Articles 3 to 10 and 12 to 14 or 16 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally. Such funds and means should be subject to confiscation and freezing of assets legislation.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) 3. This offence shall apply, regardless of whether the person alleged to have committed the offence(s) is in the same country or a different country from the one in which the terrorist(s)/terrorist organisation(s) is located or the terrorist act(s) occurred or will occur.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 3 and Article 4 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Articles 3, 4, 9 and 10 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 3, with the exception of Article 3 (2) (i), is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally, where the act manifestly causes a clear and imminent danger that one or more such offences may be committed.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that extortion with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Articles 3, 4, 9 and 10 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that extortion with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 3, with the exception of Article 3 (2) (i), is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally, where the act manifestly causes a clear and imminent danger that one or more such offences may be committed.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that extortion with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 3 and Article 4 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – title Drawing up and using false administrative documents to committing a terrorist offence
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – title Drawing up, detaining and using false administrative documents to committing a terrorist offence
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that drawing up and using of false administrative documents, with special attention to the travel documents, with a view to committing one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) and point (b) of Article 4 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that drawing up and using false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) and point (b) of Article 4 and article 9 is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that drawing up false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the offences listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that drawing up false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2) and point
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that drawing up, detaining and using false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the offences listed in points (a) to (h) of Article 3(2)
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 a (new) Article 14a Measures to combat internet platforms which incite people to terrorism or fail to cooperate in the fight against terrorism 1. Member States shall take all the measures required to remove as soon as possible from internet platforms housed on their territory illegal content which publicly extols terrorism. 2. Member States shall take measures to establish the criminal liability of internet, platforms, social media networks and internet service providers which refuse to comply with an administrative or judicial request to delete from their online platforms illegal content or content extolling terrorism.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 a (new) Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 a (new) Article 14a Measures against forms of organised crime which are typically committed in respect of the financing of terrorist acts Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that 1. serious tax fraud, serious cases of tax evasion and evasion of import or export duties and serious cases of receiving or selling property resulting from tax evasion; 2. money laundering; 3. serious fraud; 4. serious cases of counterfeiting trademarks; 5. the illicit trade in goods, including but not limited to, crude oil, narcotics, works of art, weapons and protected species; in each case with the aim of commissioning one of the criminal offences listed in Article 3, is punishable as a criminal offence when committed intentionally.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 a (new) Article 14a Burden of proof The burden of proof for Articles 3 to 14 shall lie solely on the prosecutor. No reversal of this burden, nor assumption of guilt shall be invoked
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 For an offence referred to in Article 4 and Title III to be punishable, it shall not be necessary that a terrorist offence be actually committed
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 For an offence referred to in Article 4
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 For an offence referred to in Article 4 and Title III to be punishable, it shall not be necessary that a terrorist offence be actually committed
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 For an offence referred to in Article 4 and Title III to be punishable, it shall not be necessary that a terrorist offence be actually committed, nor shall it be necessary to establish a link to a specific terrorist offence or
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 For an offence referred to in Article 4 and Title III to be punishable, it shall not be necessary that a terrorist offence be actually committed
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 For an offence referred to in Article 4 and Title III to be punishable, it shall not be necessary that a terrorist offence be actually committed
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that aiding or abetting an offence referred to in Articles 3 to 8 and 11 to 14c is made punishable.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that aiding or abetting an offence referred to in Articles 3
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that inciting an offence referred to in Articles 3 to 14c is made punishable.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that inciting an offence referred to in Articles 3 to 14 is made punishable when it provokes the commission of, or the attempt to commit, one of those offences.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that inciting
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that attempting to commit an offence referred to in Articles 3
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that attempting to commit an offence referred to in Articles 3, 6, 7
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that attempting to commit an offence referred to in Articles 3, 6, 7, 9 and 11 to 14c, with the exception of possession as provided for in point (f) of Article 3(2) and the offence referred to in point (i) of Article 3(2), is made punishable.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The acts in paragraphs 1 to 3 shall only be made punishable when in direct connection with a principal criminal act and when committed wilfully and with a clear and unequivocal intent to commit or meaningfully contribute to such an act.
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure the protection of and assistance to persons whose cooperation with the criminal justice system in the prevention, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences, puts them, or persons closely associated with them, at risk of serious physical or emotional harm, with special assistance for persons economically or socially dependent on the alleged perpetrator, i.e. female family members and children.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the offences referred to Articles 3 to 14c and 16 are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties, which may entail extradition.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In line with Directive 2014/42/EU, Member States should provide for the freezing and confiscation of assets used to commit or resulting from the commission of the offences laid down in this directive.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 a (new) Article 17a Right to effective remedies 1. Any person whose fundamental rights and freedoms have been violated in the exercise of counter-terrorism powers or the application of counter-terrorism law has a right to a speedy, effective and enforceable remedy. 2. Member States' judicial authorities shall have the ultimate responsibility to ensure that this right is effective.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) provides the
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) provides the administrative or judicial authorities with information
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 2 (2) identify or bring to justice
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 4 (4) prevent further offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14c and 16.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons can be held liable for any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14c and 16 committed for their benefit by any person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, and having a leading position within the legal person, based on one of the following:
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall also take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control by a person referred to in paragraph 1 has made possible the commission of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14c and 16 for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority.
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Liability of legal persons under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exclude
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) freezing and confiscation of assets used for or resulting from the commission of one of the criminal offences laid down in this directive, as provided by Directive 2014/42/EU.
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) The offender is a national of a Member State and who has provided training overseas to a foreign national;
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point f – paragraph 1 the offence is committed against the institutions or people of the Member State in question or against an institution, body, office or agency of the European Union and based in that Member State., or where a foreign national receives training overseas with the intention of carrying out an attack within that Member State;
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point f – paragraph 1 the offence is committed against the institutions or people of the Member State in question or against an institution, body, office, seizure of aircraft, ships or other means of public and goods transport or agency of the European Union and based in that Member State.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Each Member State shall take the measures required to establish its jurisdiction in respect of the offences referred to in Article 4 in cases where the perpetrator is present on its territory.
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. When an offence falls within the jurisdiction of more than one Member State and when any of the States concerned can validly prosecute on the basis of the same facts, the Member States concerned shall cooperate in order to decide which of them will prosecute the offenders with the aim, if possible, of centralising proceedings in a single Member State. To this end, the Member States
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Each Member State should ensure that subjects suspected or convicted of one of the crimes listed in this Directive face a strong imprisonment regime with complete isolation from the rest of the prison community and with limited and strictly controlled visits from or contact with the outside.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Member States shall ensure cooperation and information sharing with the Member State that established its jurisdiction over the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14 and 16 through established channels, including the Union agencies.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. All Member States should look out to establish the non-lapsable nature of terrorist crimes in their legal framework.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Article 21a Fundamental rights and principles 1. This Directive shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and International humanitarian law, and shall be implemented and interpreted in accordance with these rights and principles. 2. Any restriction to fundamental rights and freedoms must be provided for by the law and be necessary and proportionate for the aim pursued. 3. Any person whose fundamental rights and freedoms have been violated in the exercise of counter-terrorism powers or the application of counter-terrorism law shall have the right to a speedy, effective and enforceable judicial remedy.
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Article 21a Investigative tools Member States shall also take the necessary measures to ensure that information gathered by the national relevant authority concerning prisoners who are radicalised to violent extremism or are at risk of radicalisation are transmitted to those responsible for preventing, investigating and prosecuting offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14, as well as to intelligence services.
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Article 21a Exchange of information and judicial and police cooperation 1. Member States shall undertake to share, for investigative purposes, relevant information and data they have obtained from EU-wide databases. 2. Member States shall take the steps required in order to secure effective international judicial cooperation led by the judiciary and conventional police forces.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Article 21a Exchanges of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences 1. Member States shall systematically flag up in the Schengen Information System any person who is suspected of having committed or who has been convicted of at least one of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14 of this Directive. 2. Member States shall systematically forward to Europol details of any person who is suspected of having committed or who has been convicted of at least one of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14 of this Directive.
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 a (new) Article 21a Due process in Internet related measures Member States shall ensure that any measure taken, for the purpose of this Directive, to restrict the online distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public is in line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, is limited to what is necessary and proportionate and executed on the basis of a prior judicial authorisation.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 b (new) Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 b (new) Article 21b PNR information exchanges Member States shall exchange all PNR data concerning persons who are suspected of having committed or who have been convicted of at least one of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14 of this Directive.
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 c (new) Article 21c Without prejudice to their own investigations or proceedings, the competent authorities of a Member State shall, without prior request, forward to the competent authority of another Member State information obtained within the framework of their own investigations, if the disclosure of such information can assist the Member State receiving the information in initiating or carrying out investigations or proceedings. The Member State providing the information may, pursuant to its national law, impose conditions on the use of such information by the Member State receiving the information. This Member State shall be bound by those conditions;
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 c (new) Article 21c Situation at the external borders of the Schengen area Member States must guarantee their border and coast guard services access to the relevant databases, in particular the Europol Information System.
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 d (new) Article 21d Measures to combat online radicalisation and incitement to terrorism Member States must work together with the Commission and internet service providers to develop a joint European strategy to combat online radicalisation and incitement to terrorism. That strategy must be regularly updated.
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 d (new) Article 21d The convicting Member State shall timely store criminal record information on convictions handed down on its territory, including fingerprints, against a national of another Member States, in the ECRIS database. Member State shall ensure the confidentiality and integrity of criminal record information transmitted to other Member States. Where appropriate, the Commission shall make a legislative proposal to amend this paragraph and align it with the future directive amending Council framework Decision 2009/315/JHA, as regards the ECRIS, and replacing Council Decision 2009/316/JHA.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 e (new) Article 2e Member States shall make financial investigation an automatic component of all Counter-Terrorist investigations and share relevant financial intelligence information among all relevant actors.
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive Title 5 a (new) Due diligence obligations in respect of certain business relationships
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that investigations into,
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall ensure that measures are available to protect victims of terrorism and their family members, in accordance with Directive 2012/29/EU. With this regard, in the course of criminal proceedings particular attention shall be paid to the risk of intimidation and retaliation and to the need to protect the physical and mental integrity of victims of terrorism, including during questioning and testifying.
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that specific services to assist and support victims of terrorism are in place. Such services shall have the capacity and organisational structure necessary to provide assistance and support to these victims immediately after an attack and as long as necessary thereafter, in accordance with the specific needs of each victim. All assistance to the victims of terrorism should be provided in the best interest of the victims and under the principle of "do no harm". The services shall be confidential, free of charge and easily accessible to all victims of terrorism. They shall include in particular:
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that specific services to assist and support victims of terrorism are in place. Such services shall have the capacity and organisational structure necessary to provide assistance and support to these victims immediately after an attack and as long as necessary thereafter, in accordance with the specific needs of each victim. The services shall be confidential, free of charge and easily accessible to all victims of terrorism.
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. A European office to help victims of terrorism shall be created, with enough human and economic resources, to help Member States
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that specific services to assist and support victims of terrorism are in place. Such services shall be gender-sensitive where relevant, have the capacity and organisational structure necessary to provide assistance and support to these victims immediately after an attack and as long as necessary thereafter, in accordance with the specific needs of each victim. The services shall be confidential, free of charge and easily
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) medical, emotional and psychological support, such as trauma support and counselling;
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) specialist emotional and psychological support, such as trauma support and counselling specifically adapted to the needs of victims of terrorism;
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) vocational rehabilitation services to assist victims suffering from injuries and harm to find new jobs or change careers;
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (bb) facilitation of safe virtual connections for victims with other victims and victim run support groups;
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b c (new) (bc) community based support services;
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b d (new) (bd) services to inform family members of the identification of victims and their remains and repatriate remains;
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b e (new) (be) a single centre to receive family members of victims, and where appropriate direct victims, immediately after a terrorist attack. The centres shall in particular provide family members with: i. emotional and psychological support in accordance with their needs; ii. practical assistance; iii. information on the attack and on victims; iv. a secure environment for family members to meet; v. security from the press and advice on handling press requests;
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b f (new) (bf) an emergency information telephone line to be operated following an attack. Provision shall be made for the service to provide foreign language assistance.
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Members States shall ensure that any officials who are likely to come into personal contact with women and children who are victim of terrorism are able to access and receive appropriate initial and ongoing training, to a level appropriate to their contact with victims, so that they are able to identify victims and their needs and deal with them in a respectful, sensitive, professional and non-discriminatory manner.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall establish co- ordination mechanisms to ensure effective transition of support for victims from the immediate aftermath of the attack to the long term. Such mechanisms shall ensure in particular the referral of victims to long term services where different organisations provide support during different time frames;
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Member State shall provide specialists in support to victims of terrorism in emergency response planning to ensure delivery of appropriate support services immediately after an attack as well as in the long term.
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Member States shall ensure that victims of terrorism are offered an individual assessment to determine their support needs and that support services are made available in accordance with those needs. The needs assessment shall be reviewed on a regular basis to determine on-going support needs. A follow up review within an appropriate period of time after the attacks, based on existing knowledge of trauma reactions, shall be provided to victims.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Member States shall establish coordinated mechanisms to collect information on victims of a terrorist attack taking place in their territory and to provide them with specific information relevant to their needs in the immediate aftermath of a terrorist attack and during any criminal proceedings.
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Such mechanisms shall in particular provide for: a) A permanently established single website through which all public information related to any terrorist attack that takes place on the territory of the Member State can be accessed. The following information should be gathered and made available as a matter of urgency through the website: contact information of any organisations responsible for providing support and information to victims, family members and members of the public following a terrorist attack, and information on the attack and measures established in response to the attack, including information on finding or connecting with missing victims and measures to assist victims to return home, which shall include: i. How to retrieve any property lost as a result of an attack; ii. Normal psychological responses of victims to an attack and guidance to victims on ways to mitigate any negative responses, and information on possible non-visible injuries such as hearing loss; iii. Information on how to replace identification documents; iv. Information on how to obtain financial assistance, compensation or government benefits; v. Information on the specific rights of victims of terrorism and family members, including rights within criminal proceedings as prescribed in Directive 2012/29/EU; vi. Any other information deemed necessary for the purposes of ensuring victims are informed about their rights, their safety, or services available to them; b) A private access website, available to the victims of terrorist attacks and their family members, providing information to the victims which is not publicly available; c) Planning on informing family members about the situation of victims; d) Collection of the same information data on victims by all authorities and organisations having responsibility for the reception, treatment and assistance of victims. Information shall be collected in accordance with the needs of all organisations involved in the response to the terrorist attack and in the support to the victims and their families;
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Member States shall establish specific measures in the case of a mass casualty attack to enable large numbers of victims to participate in criminal proceedings.
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. All provisions on protection, support and rights of victims of terrorism will be taken up and developed in a European Directive on victims of terrorism
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities cooperate among each other to ensure access to information for victims of terrorism who are residents of a Member State other than that one where the terrorist offence was committed.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities cooperate among each other to ensure access to information for victims of terrorism who are residents of a Member State other than that one where the terrorist offence was committed. The access to information shall include in particular information about the victims' rights, available support services and accessible compensation schemes. Such coordination mechanisms shall include: i. procedures to enable the safe transfer of information about victims of the terrorist attack to relevant support services, taking into account relevant data protection laws. ii. the determination of a coordinating support organisation in the Member State of residence of any victim of an attack. iii. the transfer of information to be published on websites as provided for under Article 22. Member State shall ensure that such information is included on their own websites at least where they are aware of victims who are residents or citizens.
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall establish specific measures to ensure the provision of information to victims not resident in the territory of the Member State of the attack. Such measures shall in particular focus on the rights of non-resident victims within criminal proceedings and for compensation.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Member States shall ensure that where the exercise of rights is bound by time limitation periods, delays resulting from translation and interpretation difficulties shall be taken into account.
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Member States shall establish measures to assist victims not resident in the Member State of criminal proceedings to participate in criminal proceedings and to ensure they are able to exercise their rights in accordance with their role in proceedings.
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Fundamental rights and principles 1. This Directive shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to uphold fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and international humanitarian law. 2. Restrictions on fundamental rights and freedoms shall be provided for by law and shall be necessary and proportionate to the aim pursued. 3. This Directive shall be implemented in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the principles of EU law. 4. Anyone whose fundamental rights and freedoms are infringed during anti- terrorism operations or in connection with the enforcement of anti-terrorism laws shall be entitled to a swift, effective and enforceable legal remedy.
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Fundamental Rights and Principles 1. This Directive shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and International humanitarian law. 2. Restrictions to fundamental rights and freedoms must be provided for by law, be necessary and proportionate for the aim pursued. This Directive shall not result in arbitrary decisions or in discriminatory policies and practices based on perceived nationality, religion, ethnic or racial origin. 3. This Directive shall be implemented in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights and principles of Union law.
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Proportionality, necessity and fundamental rights 1. In the implementation of this Directive, Member States shall ensure that criminalisation is provided for by law, proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and necessary in a democratic society and shall exclude any form of arbitrariness and discrimination. This Directive shall not result in arbitrary decisions or in discriminatory policies and practices based on perceived nationality, religion, ethnic or racial origin. 2. This Directive shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other obligations under international humanitarian law. 3. This Directive shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Fundamental Rights and Principles 1. This Directive is without prejudice to fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and International humanitarian law. 2. Restrictions to fundamental rights and freedoms must be provided for by law, and must be necessary and proportionate for the aim pursued. 3. This Directive shall be implemented in full accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights and principles of Union law.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Fundamental rights and non- discrimination 1. This Directive shall be implemented without prejudice to and in respect with fundamental rights and freedoms as enshrined in the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union. 2. This Directive shall be implemented with respect to principle of proportionality and shall exclude any form of arbitrariness and discrimination.
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 b (new) Article 23b Freedom of expression 1. Nothing in this Directive may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for the purpose of expressing an opinion. The public expression of radical, political or controversial views on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Directive and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences. 2. This Directive shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction of fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media as they result from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 b (new) Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 b (new) Article 23b Emergency situations and fundamental rights In time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation, Member States may take measures to derogate certain rights, in line with Union and international law. Such circumstances do not relieve the authorities from demonstrating that the measures undertaken are applied solely for the purpose of combating terrorism and are directly related to the specific objective of combating terrorism.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 b (new) Article 23b Fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression 1. Nothing in this Directive may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for the expression of an opinion. The expression of radical, polemical or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Directive and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit a terrorist offence. 2. This Directive shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction of fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and the freedom of expression in other media as they result from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 b (new) Article 23b Cooperation and information exchange 1. Member States shall ensure introducing an obligation to cooperate and to exchange information with other Member States regarding the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14 and Article 16. 2. Member State shall ensure introducing an obligation to cooperate with and to transmit information regarding the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 14 and Article 16 relevant for other Member States via the Union agencies, i.e. Europol and Eurojust, recognizing their leading role in the coordination process.
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 b (new) Article 23b Member States shall ensure that any person whose fundamental rights and freedoms have been violated in the exercise of counter-terrorism powers or the application of counter-terrorism law has a right to a speedy, effective and enforceable remedy.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 c (new) Article 23c Non-discrimination This Directive shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures which could result in direct or indirect discrimination or which would be based on religious practice and ethnic criteria.
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 c (new) Article 23c Right to effective remedies 1. Any person whose fundamental rights and freedoms have been violated in the exercise of counter-terrorism powers or the application of counter-terrorism law has a right to a speedy, effective and enforceable remedy. 2. Member States' judicial authorities shall have the ultimate responsibility to ensure that this right is effective.
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 d (new) Article 23d Emergency situations and fundamental rights In time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation, Member States may take measures to derogate from certain rights, in line with Union and international law. Such circumstances do not relieve the authorities from demonstrating that the measures undertaken are applied solely for the purpose of combating terrorism and are directly related to the specific objective of combating terrorism.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 d (new) Article 23d Non-discrimination This Directive shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures which could result in direct or indirect discrimination or which would be based on religious practice and ethnic criteria. The Commission shall regularly assess the implementation of the Directive with regard to any potential disproportionate impact on groups of the population and remedial procedures to correct discriminatory practices and report their findings to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 e (new) Article 23e Freedom of expression 1. Nothing in this Directive may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for the expression of an opinion. The expression of radical, polemical or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Directive and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit a terrorist offence. 2. This Directive shall not have the effect to take measures in contradiction of fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression, including freedom of the press and the freedom of expression resulting from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – title Transposition and review mechanisms by Member States
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – title Transposition and review mechanisms by Member States
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall conduct annual independent reviews of and reporting on the exercise of powers under the laws falling within the scope of this Directive.
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall conduct annual independent reviews of and reporting on the exercise of powers under the laws falling within the scope of this Directive.
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall, by [12
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall, by [24 months after the deadline for implementation of
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall, by [24 months after the deadline for implementation of this Directive], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Directive. Regular evaluation of the Directive implementation should include assessment of a potential disproportionate impact of measures on groups of the population, and remedial procedures to correct discriminatory practices.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by [48 months after the deadline for implementation of this Directive], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the impact and added value of this Directive on combating terrorism, and protecting and assisting victims of terrorism. The Commission shall take into account the information provided by Member States under Decision 2005/671/JHA.
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by [
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by [48 months after the deadline for implementation of this Directive], and every two years, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the impact on fundamental rights, proportionality, the effectiveness and added value of this Directive on combating terrorism. The Commission shall take into account the information provided by Member States under Decision 2005/671/JHA.
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by [
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by [48 months after the deadline for implementation of this Directive], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the impact and added value of this Directive on combating terrorism and its impact on fundamental rights and freedoms. The Commission shall take into account the information provided by Member States under Decision 2005/671/JHA.
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In light of the independent reports of the European Commission, Member States shall conduct parliamentary periodic reviews.
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall regularly assess the implementation of the Directive with regard to any potential disproportionate impact on groups of the population and remedial procedures to correct discriminatory practices and report their findings to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In light of the independent reports of the European Commission, Member States shall conduct parliamentary periodic reviews.
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 a (new) Article 26a Sunset Clause This Directive shall expire after every five years, unless the Directive is prolonged for another five years by the Council and the Parliament upon a proposal of the Commission.
source: 580.626
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27513&j=0&l=en
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.046New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-577046_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0019)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0019)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.621New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-580621_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.626New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-580626_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE597.753&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AL-597753_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27513&j=0&l=en
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170215&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-02-15-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE597.753New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE597.753&secondRef=01 |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0228&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0228_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0046New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0046_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/05240New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017L0541New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017L0541 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/13 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/summary/0 |
Amending JHA act 2005/671/JHA
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en |
activities/12 |
|
other/1/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en |
activities/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0625:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0625:EN
|
activities/9/meeting_id |
Old
3525New
3526 |
activities/9 |
|
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/8/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2017-01-24T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/2/date |
2017-01-24T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/5/committees/2/date |
2017-01-24T00:00:00
|
activities/5/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2017-02-14T00:00:00New
2017-02-15T00:00:00 |
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/8 |
|
committees/2/date |
2017-01-24T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/2 |
|
activities/4/committees/2 |
|
activities/5/committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities/6 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/4/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/5/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/4/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/5/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4f1ac998b819f25efd000144New
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1/name |
Old
KIRKHOPE TimothyNew
MACOVEI Monica |
activities/4/committees/2/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4f1ac998b819f25efd000144New
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e |
activities/4/committees/2/shadows/1/name |
Old
KIRKHOPE TimothyNew
MACOVEI Monica |
activities/5/committees/2/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4f1ac998b819f25efd000144New
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e |
activities/5/committees/2/shadows/1/name |
Old
KIRKHOPE TimothyNew
MACOVEI Monica |
committees/2/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4f1ac998b819f25efd000144New
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e |
committees/2/shadows/1/name |
Old
KIRKHOPE TimothyNew
MACOVEI Monica |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/6 |
|
committees/2/shadows/4 |
|
committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/6 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
LIBE/8/05240
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/2/date |
2016-01-11T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|