Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | CAVADA Jean-Marie ( ALDE) | NIEBLER Angelika ( PPE), NEGRESCU Victor ( S&D), KARIM Sajjad ( ECR), REDA Felix ( Verts/ALE), BERGERON Joëlle ( EFDD), LEBRETON Gilles ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | VERHEYEN Sabine ( PPE) | Giorgos GRAMMATIKAKIS ( S&D), Andrew LEWER ( ECR), Michel REIMON ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ZORRINHO Carlos ( S&D) | Amjad BASHIR ( ECR), Michał BONI ( PPE), Kaja KALLAS ( ALDE), Michel REIMON ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ZULLO Marco ( EFDD) | Emma McCLARKIN ( ECR), Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL), Felix REDA ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
CORRIGENDUM to Regulation (EU) 2017/1128 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market ( OJ L 168, 30.6.2017 ).
NB : the corrections concern the dates and time limits originally laid down in respect of: (i) the application to existing contracts and rights acquired before the date of application of the Regulation; (ii) the review of the Regulation by the Commission; (iii) the date of application of the Regulation.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2017/1128 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market.
PURPOSE: to allow consumers who paid for online content services in their home country to access them when visiting another country within the EU.
CONTENT: the Regulation establishes a common EU approach to allow subscribers to access online content (such as films, sporting broadcasts, music, e-books or games) for which they have paid in their Member State of residence, when subscribers temporarily visit another Member State when on holidays, business trips or limited student stays.
Providers of all online content services that are provided against the payment of money will not be able to impose any additional charges on the subscriber for access and use of the service in another Member State where the subscriber is temporarily present. They may not take any action to reduce the quality of delivery of the online content service when providing the online content service.
Verification of the Member State of residence : to avoid abuses, service providers will verify the subscribers' member state of residence. The verifications will be carried out in compliance with EU data protection rules.
The means of verification will be reasonable, proportionate and effective . Unless the subscriber’s Member State of residence can be verified with sufficient certainty on the basis of a single means of verification, providers should rely on two means of verification from the list in the Regulation. These may be:
an identity card; bank account or credit or debit card number; the place of installation of a set top box, a decoder or a similar device used for supply of services; the payment by the subscriber of a licence fee for other services; the billing address or the postal address; an Internet protocol (IP) address check.
If the provider has reasonable doubts about the subscriber’s Member State of residence, he may repeat the verification of the Member State of residence of the subscriber. The provider will be authorised to cease the access to the online service when the subscriber cannot prove his/her member state of residence.
Copyright holders will have the possibility of authorising the use of their content without the obligation to verify the subscriber's residence. In such cases, the contract between the provider and the subscriber for the provision of an online content service should be used to determine the latter’s Member State of residence.
Online content services provided without payment of money : free to air services, such as those provided by certain public broadcasters, will have the option of benefiting from the regulation provided that they verify the country of residence of their subscribers. The provider shall inform its subscribers of its decision to provide the online content service, prior to providing that service.
Application to existing contracts : this Regulation shall apply also to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application . By 2 June 2018, the provider of an online content service provided against payment of money shall verify the Member State of residence of those subscribers who concluded contracts for the provision of the online content service before that date.
Review : by 2 April 2021, and as required thereafter, the Commission shall assess the application of the Regulation in the light of legal, technological and economic developments, and submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report thereon.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 20.7.2017.
APPLICATION: from 1.4.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 586 votes to 34, with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Subject matter and scope : Members stipulated that this Regulation shall introduce a common approach in the Union to the cross-border portability of online content services, by ensuring that subscribers to portable online content services which are lawfully provided in their Member State of residence can access and use those services when temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence . Such access and use shall be subject to effective prior verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
Providers of online content services should not subject their subscribers to any additional charges for the provision of cross-border portability of online content services and its use in another Member State where he is temporarily present. They should not take any measures to reduce the quality of service provided.
The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may decide to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service on the condition that the provider verifies the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
Verification of the Member State of residence : the provider shall verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber by using not more than two of the following means of verification and shall ensure that the means used are reasonable, proportionate and effective:
an identity card, electronic means of identification; payment details; the place of installation of a set top box; an internet or telephone service supply contract; a utility bill; the billing address or the postal address of the subscriber; an internet protocol (IP) address check.
If the provider has reasonable doubts about the subscriber's Member State of residence, the provider may repeat the verification of the Member State of residence of the subscriber.
If the subscriber fails to provide that information, and as a result the provider is unable to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence, the provider shall not, on the basis of this Regulation, enable the subscriber to access or use the online content service when the subscriber is temporarily present in a Member State.
The holders of copyright or related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service may authorise the provision of, access to and use of their content under this Regulation without the verification of the Member State of residence. In such cases, the contract between the provider and the subscriber for the provision of an online content service shall be sufficient to determine the subscriber's Member State of residence.
Contractual provisions : any contractual provisions, including those between providers of online content services and holders of copyright or related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services, as well as those between such providers and their subscribers, which are contrary to this Regulation, including those which prohibit cross-border portability of online content services or limit such portability to a specific time period , shall be unenforceable.
Moreover, the providers and holders of rights relevant for the provision of online content services should not be allowed to circumvent the application of this Regulation by choosing the law of a third country as the law applicable to contracts between them.
Protection of data : the use of the means of verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence and any processing of personal data under this Regulation, shall be limited to what is necessary and proportionate in order to achieve its purpose . Data collected for the purpose of verifying the subscriber's Member State of residence shall be immediately and irreversibly destroyed on the completion of each verification.
Application of the Regulation : Members proposed a period of nine months for the application of the Regulation.
Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and at three-yearly intervals thereafter, the Commission shall assess its application and submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report thereon.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Jean-Marie CAVADA (ADLE, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection as well as the Committee on Culture and Education, exercising their prerogatives as associated committees in accordance with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave their opinions on the report.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Objective and scope : Members stipulated that the Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to legally acquired online content services in their Member State of residence can access and use those services without any additional charges, while temporarily present (for leisure, business or study purposes) in a Member State other than the Member State of residence. Such access and use shall be subject to effective prior verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
Online content service providers may be included in the scope of the regulation on condition that they take all necessary measures to permit verification of the Member State of residence of their users.
Obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services : the provider of an online content service shall:
have the possibility for a service provider to enable a subscriber also to access and use the content licensed to the service provider for the Member State in which the subscriber is temporarily present; ensure that the quality provided is not below the standard of that provided in the Member State where the subscriber is temporarily present; inform the subscriber of potential variations in the quality of delivery of the online content service; ensure that the portability of its services is available on the same range and number of devices as is the case in the Member State of residence of the subscriber.
Contractual clauses designed to prohibit or limit the cross-border portability of online content services and limiting the portability to a specific time period shall be unenforceable under this Regulation.
Verification of the Member State of residence : Members proposed that the criteria for verification of the Member State of residence of the subscriber should be indicated in a semi-open list. Thus, online content service providers shall use a combination of two of the means of verification (or even just one of the means) among which: an identity card, electronic means of identification, bank details, an internet or telephone service supply contract, the payment of local taxes, a public utility bill of the subscriber confirming the subscriber’s address, random checking of the subscriber’s Internet Protocol (IP) address.
The provider of an online content service shall be entitled to request that a subscriber provides the information needed to verify his or her Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide such information, the provider shall not offer him or her portability of its online content services, until such time as it is able to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
The holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service shall be informed of the verification process used by a service provider to verify its subscribers’ Member State of residence.
Contractual provisions : providers of online content services and holders of rights relevant for the provision of those services should not be allowed to circumvent the application of this Regulation by choosing the law of a third country to be the law which is to apply to contracts between them or to contracts between providers and subscriber.
It is also stated that providers of online content services shall ensure that any processing of personal data under this Regulation is necessary and proportionate in order to achieve the relevant purpose.
Application of the Regulation : Members proposed a period of 12 months (instead of 6) for the application of the Regulation.
Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and at three-yearly intervals thereafter, the Commission shall assess the application of this Regulation and submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report thereon.
PURPOSE: to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with Council.
BACKGROUND: the rapid take up of online content services and increasing use of portable devices, including across borders, means that Europeans today expect to use online content services from wherever they are in the Union (cross-border portability). However, when people travel in the EU, they frequently cannot enjoy such cross-border portability or can do so only to a limited extent . The absence of, or problems with, cross border portability of online content services in the EU results from the licensing practices of right holders and/or the commercial practices of service providers.
Cross-border portability concerns online content services to which consumers have lawful access, or content that they purchased or rented online in their country of residence and to which they want to continue to have access when travelling in the EU. Consumer demand for the cross-border portability of online content services is substantial and expected to grow
The Digital Single Market Strategy puts forward a range of initiatives with the objective of creating an internal market for digital content and services. This proposal is among the first of the initiatives under the strategy. The Commission considers that the proposal will have positive effects on competitiveness as it will help innovation in online content services and attract more consumers to them.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option, in addition to establishing a mechanism ensuring portability: (i) would impose an obligation on providers of online content services to ensure cross-border portability of such services and (ii) would establish that any provisions in contracts limiting cross-border portability would be unenforceable. This option would respond to consumers' expectations and the impact on industry is expected to be marginal because the portability of online content services does not extend the range of users of the service and as such does not challenge the territorial exclusivity of licences
CONTENT: the proposed regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, which are delivered on a portable basis, can receive these services when temporarily present in another Member State (cross-border portability).
Definitions : the proposal contains definitions that will need to be interpreted in a uniform manner in the EU:
a "subscriber" is defined as a consumer who, on the basis of a contract for the provision of an online content service, may access and use such service in the Member State of his or her residence; a "consumer" is defined as any natural person who, in contracts covered by the regulation, is acting for purposes which are outside his or her trade, business, craft or profession.
"Online content service" is covered by the proposal when: (i) the service is lawfully provided online in the Member State of residence; (ii) the service is provided on a portable basis; (iii) the service is an audiovisual media service within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council or a service whose main feature is the provision of access to works, other subject matter or transmissions of broadcasting organisations.
Two scenarios are covered as regards online content services: (i) services which are provided for payment of money (directly or indirectly); and (ii) services which are provided without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the service provider.
if a subscriber receives an online content service without payment of money, the provider will only be obliged to enable the subscriber to enjoy cross-border portability if the provider verifies the subscriber's Member State of residence; if, however, a consumer just accepts the terms and conditions of a free of charge online content service but does not register on a website of such service (and hence the provider does not verify the Member State of residence of such a consumer), the service provider will not be obliged to provide cross-border portability for such service.
Cross-border portability of online content services : the proposal requires the provider to enable a subscriber to use the online content service while the subscriber is temporarily present in another Member State. This applies to the same content, on the same range and number of devices and the same range of functionalities as offered in the Member State of residence.
However, this obligation does not extend to any quality requirements applicable to the delivery of such service when the service is provided in the Member State of residence. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement. In addition, the draft regulation will oblige the provider to inform the subscriber of the quality of delivery of the online content service when accessed and used in a Member State other than the Member State of residence.
Localisation: the proposal sets out a mechanism establishing the localisation of the service for purposes of portability: the provision as well as the access to and use of the service by a subscriber who is temporarily present in another Member State is deemed to occur solely in the Member State of residence. For the licensing of copyright and related rights, this means that the relevant copyright acts, which occur when the service is provided to consumers on a basis of crossborder portability, are deemed to occur solely in the Member State of residence .
Contractual provisions : the proposal renders unenforceable:
any contractual terms contrary to the cross-border portability obligation, in particular those which limit either consumer's possibilities as to the cross-border portability of his or her online content services or service provider's ability to deliver it; any contractual terms contrary to the legal mechanism which enables service providers to comply with the cross-border portability obligation.
However, right holders may require that the service provider makes use of means in order to verify that the service is provided in conformity with the regulation.
The draft regulation also provides that: (i) the processing of personal data carried out within the framework of the Regulation shall be carried out in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC and Directive 2002/58/EC; (ii) the regulation shall also apply to any contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of the application of the regulation if they are relevant for the provision of the service, the access to or the use of the service.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SWD(2022)0173
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)494
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2017/1128
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 168 30.06.2017, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32017R1128R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 198 28.07.2017, p. 0042
- Draft final act: 00009/2017/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0224/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Debate in Council: 3519
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0378/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE589.348
- Committee opinion: PE583.879
- Committee opinion: PE583.955
- Committee opinion: PE578.729
- Committee draft report: PE585.465
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0719/2016
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0039/2016
- Debate in Council: 3451
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2015)0270
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2015)0271
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2015)0627
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2015)0270
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2015)0271
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0039/2016
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0719/2016
- Committee draft report: PE585.465
- Committee opinion: PE578.729
- Committee opinion: PE583.955
- Committee opinion: PE583.879
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE589.348
- Draft final act: 00009/2017/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)494
- Follow-up document: SWD(2022)0173
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
- Contribution: COM(2015)0627
Activities
- Felix REDA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jan Philipp ALBRECHT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giorgos GRAMMATIKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kaja KALLAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sajjad KARIM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Momchil NEKOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Virginie ROZIÈRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marietje SCHAAKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anneleen VAN BOSSUYT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogdan Brunon WENTA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0378/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada - Am 54 #
Amendments | Dossier |
716 |
2015/0284(COD)
2016/05/17
CULT
139 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residing, defined as the place where one has established a permanent centre of interest with the intention of giving it a lasting character, a place where an individual routinely returns and with which he or she has a continuous connection, as established on the basis of verification means in accordance with this Regulation;
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residing and to which the subscriber returns regularly, and which the provider can verify as such, in accordance with Article 3a;
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c a (new) (ca) For the purposes of this Regulation, a consumer has one Member State of residence;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a transitory presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence determined with the provider of the online content service;
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence on a portable basis and which is an audiovisual media service within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU or a service the main feature of which is the provision of lawful access to and use of works
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e a (new) (ea) "Portable" means that subscribers can effectively access and use the legally acquired online content service in the Member State of residence without being limited to a specific location;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence on a portable basis and which is an audiovisual media service within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU or a service the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of works, other protected subject matter or transmissions of broadcasting organisations, whether in a linear or an on-demand manner
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – point 2 (2) without payment of money
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 –point f (f) "Portable" means that subscribers can effectively access and use the online content service
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service provided against payment of money shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is verified as temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) The obligation set out in paragraph 1 shall not extend to cross- border access of online content for which the service provider has not acquired authorisation for use from the right holder.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new) (1b) The obligation set out in paragraph 1 shall apply from ... [12 months following the day of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union].
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 (2) The obligation set out in paragraph 1
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall inform the subscriber, in advance, of the quality of delivery of the online content service provided in accordance with paragraph 1.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service, where possible on the basis of the data available to the provider, shall inform the subscriber of the quality of delivery of the online content
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Opt-in The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service provided that: (a) it determines and verifies the Member State of residence of its subscribers in accordance with this Regulation; (b) it informs the relevant holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service, as well as its subscribers, within a reasonable time period before enabling such access and use; and (c) it applies the provisions of this Regulation from the moment it enables the cross-border portability for its subscribers.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Obligation to verify the Member State of residence 1. The provider of an online content service provided against payment of money shall make use of effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of its subscribers. These means shall be reasonable and shall not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve their purpose. Unless the Member State of residence can be sufficiently established on the basis of a single verification means, the provider of an online content service shall rely on a combination of such means. 2. In order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1, the provider shall rely on the following verification means: (a) an identity card or any other valid document confirming subscriber's Member State of residence; (b) the billing address or the postal address of the subscriber; (c) bank details such as the bank account or local credit or debit card of the subscriber; (d) the place of installation of a set top box or a similar device used for supply of services to the subscriber; (e) the subscriber being a party to a contract for internet or telephone connection in the Member State; (f) the subscriber paying a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State, such as public service broadcasting; or (g) sampling or periodic checking of the Internet Protocol (IP) address to identify the Member State where the subscriber accesses and uses the online content service or identifying that Member State by other means of geolocation.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Providers of online content without payment of money 1. Providers of online content services provided without payment of money may decide to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service in accordance with this Regulation should they be able to verify and authenticate a subscriber's Member State of residence to a reasonable degree of certainty. 2. Providers of online content services provided without payment of money, equivalent to the obligation on those providers who do receive payment of money, shall notify subscribers, the relevant holders of copyright and related rights and those holding any other rights in the content of online content service provision, of its decision to provide portability of content in accordance with paragraph 1. This notification shall be made by means that are adequate and proportionate. 3. Any decision made by providers of online content services provided without payment of money pursuant to paragraph 1 shall mean that those providers shall be subject to this Regulation.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Holders of copyright and related rights Under this Regulation, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service may authorise the access to and use of their content without the verification of the Member State of residence.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 c (new) Article 3c Verification of the Member State of residence 1. The provider of an online content service enabling the access to and use of an online content service for a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State shall take effective measures to verify on a regular basis the Member State of residence of its subscribers, and make sure that the access to and use of the service complies with this Regulation. 2. To comply with obligation set out in paragraph 1, the service provider may, inter alia: (a) sample or periodically check the IP address; (b) request proof as set out in Article 3b(2). 3. Should the provider have grounds to reasonably doubt that a subscriber is accessing and using its service in accordance with this Regulation, it shall take further measures to verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber. 4. The verification measures shall be reasonable, proportionate and not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the purpose of this Regulation. 5. The relevant holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service shall be informed of the verification process followed by the provider to verify the Member State of residence of its subscriber. 6. The provider shall be entitled to request the subscriber to provide the information necessary for the verification of the Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide that information and as a result the provider is unable to verify the Member State of residence as required by this Regulation, the provider shall not, on the basis of this Regulation, enable this subscriber to access or use the online content service when he or she is temporarily present in a Member State.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The provision of an online content service
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The provision of an online content service to, as well as the access to and the use of this service by, a subscriber, in accordance with Article 3(1), shall be deemed to occur solely in the Member State of residence including for the purposes of Directive 96/9/EC, Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive 2006/115/EC, Directive 2009/24
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the rights of a provider in the Member State where a subscriber is physically located and shall not prevent the provider, if it so wishes, from granting access to content available in a Member State to a subscriber temporarily present in that Member State.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services and service providers, as well as between service providers and subscribers which are contrary to Article
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services and service providers, as well as between
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Contractual changes arising from the application of this Regulation shall not confer any right to withdraw from any contract or agreement, either between the subscriber and the provider or between the provider and the right holder.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new) (1b) Amendments, adjustments or other contractual changes arising from the implementation of this Regulation shall not constitute a justifiable reason for the adjustment of charges, fees or rates, or of any other financial relations between the subscriber, the provider or the holder of rights.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1,
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may require that the service provider
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2)
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may contractually require
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) Holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may withdraw the provider's licence to use the content they have rights on, should the provider fail to act in accordance with Article 3(1) and Articles 3b and 3c.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Implementation and reporting 1. Member States shall create or designate a body to monitor the proper implementation of this Regulation on its territory and inform the Commission of such body. 2. The body created or designated in accordance with paragraph 1 shall receive and examine complaints regarding abuse or insufficient measures taken by online content service providers or right holders in the Member State in application of this Regulation, in particular for the application of Article 3(1) and Articles 3b, 3c and 5. That body shall also provide an opinion on such complaints. 3. The Commission shall produce guidelines, where necessary, on the basis of the complaints that were reported to the bodies created or designated in accordance with paragraph 1. 4. The Commission shall produce an evaluation report three years after the date of application of this Regulation, assessing its implementation, particularly as regards the notion of temporary presence and the mechanisms concerning the determination and verification of the Member State of residence. The Commission shall accompany this evaluation report with proposals, legislative or not, to improve the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Evaluation Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation the Commission shall assess the application of this Regulation and shall submit a report thereon to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall include an assessment of the use of cross-border portability and the verification of the Member State of residence and, if necessary, on the need for a review. The Commission's report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union travelling for leisure or business. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which legally offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper temporary access and use of such online content services cross border should be eliminated.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The protection of authors, creators and right holders is a paramount objective for the Union and one that must be strictly adhered to in these times of technological change. That change nevertheless dictates that the forms such protection takes should be redesigned, so that they continue to be effective. In order to ensure a balance between that protection, on the one hand, and the safeguarding and enhancing of the Union's cultural diversity, especially as regards minorities, on the other, the Union must be viewed as a single geographical entity, with a view to full and effective completion of the digital single market.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) As part of a further harmonisation copyright law, the Union and Member States should develop new forms of transnational European licences in the future. These would not constitute a loss of revenue for either creators or for right holders and would protect the expression of cultural and linguistic diversity across the Union. The use of online content services in the Union should be fairly regulated for creators, right holders and users.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In the context of online content services across the Union on a portable basis, it is of utmost importance to guarantee the promotion of European works and Europe's cultural and linguistic diversity including minority languages.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have legally acquired the right to use in their
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis, which may be unjustified, as well as from the fact that online service providers may choose to serve specific markets only.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis as well as from the fact that online service providers may choose to serve specific markets only. These practices play a strong role in the financing of European cultural content and respond to the needs of European markets. While such practices should not hamper the legitimate access to and use of online content services by consumers when they are temporarily present in another Member State, the territorial licencing system remains vital for the continuation of a strong European cultural diversity.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The same applies to other content such as sporting events which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law but which may be protected by copyright, related rights or by virtue of other specific legislation under
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The acquisition of a licence for the relevant rights is not always possible, notably when rights in content are licensed on an exclusive basis. In order to ensure
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In addition, the Court held in Joined cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, Football Association Premier League and Others, EU:C:2011:631, that
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured and, with regard to the audiovisual sector, without abolishing the territorial principle as this would lead to a disproportionate loss to the detriment of the right holders and to a significant distortion of the market for premium audiovisual content.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured. This is designed to ensure that those online content service providers who intend to adopt business models based on full accessibility of their services across the Union, moving beyond territorial exclusivity, are able to innovate and compete on an equal footing with service providers who persist with traditional models, thereby helping to complete the digital single market to the advantage of all consumers in the Union.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Portability should, in any case, be distinguished from the concept of cross- border access, which does not fall within the scope of this Regulation. As there is no contradiction between the principle of territoriality and the removal of barriers to portability of content services, the enhancement of portability of legally available and legally acquired services could be an important step to end unjustified geoblocking and to stimulate accessibility and the cross-border functionality of subscriptions.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) As portability applies to previously acquired online content, it should be understood as an essential component of cross-border access. Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is also to ensure cross-border access for private and public users such as libraries and educational and cultural projects and institutions that need to access online content while being present in another Member State.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) This Regulation provides legal and technical solutions to enable cross-border portability of online content services legally acquired for subscribers temporarily present in another Member State. It does not aim to change and should not affect the existing system of territorial licensing, which is key in the financing, production and distribution of European audiovisual works.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory in the Union, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) An online service which is not an audiovisual media service within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU and which uses works, other subject matter or transmissions of broadcasting organisations in a merely ancillary manner should not be covered by this Regulation, although it should, as far as possible, be provided in accordance with the guiding principles of portability and accessibility throughout the Union. Such services include websites that use works or other protected subject matter only in an ancillary manner such as graphical elements or music used as background, where the main purpose of such websites is, for example, the sale of goods.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State of residence in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is not appropriate to require service providers that do not offer portable services within the
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Full and effective completion of the digital single market will presumably result in a situation in which the public authorities will be called upon to regulate, in the public interest, both content services and other kinds of services offered online which are provided in return for another non-monetary service (e.g. personal navigation data). The Commission should therefore bear this aspect in mind when this Regulation is reviewed.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Providers of online content services are already in a position to authenticate the Member State of residence of their subscribers at the time of the initial subscription but also have the ability to verify the continual access of content from outside the Member State of residence. The practice of geoblocking currently demonstrates the ability of service providers to deem whether usage is within a specific Member State of residence or outside that Member State, without hampering consumer privacy.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers in accordance with this Regulation. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, information such as a payment of a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State of residence, the existence of a contract for internet or
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence. This obligation is mandatory and therefore the parties may not exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect. Any action by a service provider which would prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State and not infringe this Regulation, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery, would amount to a circumvention of the obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services and therefore would be contrary to this Regulation.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) A derogation from the obligation to offer cross-border portability on certain non-portable devices may be allowed in very limited circumstances where guaranteeing access for a subscriber would require the online service provider to enter into a separate contractual agreement with a third party device manufacturer or platform controller, as this may be technologically unfeasible or legally challenging.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services which are provided against payment of money comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those service providers which lawfully provide portable online content services in the Member State of residence of subscribers are always entitled to provide such services to those subscribers when they are temporarily present in another Member State. This should be achieved by establishing that the provision, the access to and the use of such online content service should be deemed to occur in the Member State of the subscriber's residence. This legal fiction shall not prevent the provider from offering its subscriber, who is temporarily present in another Member State, online content that the provider lawfully provides in that Member State.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those service providers which lawfully provide portable online content services in the Member State of residence of subscribers are always entitled to provide such services to those subscribers when they are temporarily present in another Member State. This should be achieved by establishing that the provision, the access to and the use of such online content service should be deemed to occur in the Member State of the subscriber's residence. This Regulation and in particular the legal mechanism localising the provision of, the access to and the use of an online content service in the Member State of residence of the subscriber does not prevent a service provider from offering its subscriber who is temporarily present in another Member State an online content service that the provider lawfully provides in that Member State.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) This Regulation should not be interpreted as restricting a service provider from offering its services to a customer permanently located in another Member State, provided that the necessary licences have been acquired in accordance with Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and that they have authorisation from the right holders to use their content. __________________ 1a Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi- territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 72).
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Nothing in this Regulation should be interpreted as restricting a service provider from offering its services to a customer permanently located in another Member State.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) For the licensing of copyright and related rights, this means that relevant acts of reproduction, communication to the public and making available of works and other protected subject-matter, as well as the acts of extraction or re-utilization in relation to databases protected by sui generis rights, which occur when the service is provided to subscribers
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) For the licensing of copyright and related rights, this means that relevant acts of reproduction, communication to the public and making available of works and other protected subject-matter, as well as the acts of extraction or re-utilization in relation to databases protected by sui generis rights, which occur when the service is provided to subscribers when they are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, should be deemed to occur in the subscribers' Member State of residence. The service providers, therefore, should be deemed to carry out such acts on the basis of the respective authorisations from the right holders concerned for the Member State of residence of these subscribers. Whenever service providers can carry out acts of communication to the public or reproduction in the Member State of the subscriber on the basis of an authorisation from the right holders concerned, a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State other than his Member State of residence should be able to access and use the service and where necessary carry out any relevant acts of reproduction such as downloading which he would be entitled to do in his own Member State of
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) To safeguard cultural and linguistic diversity, the production, marketing and distribution of creative content across the Union, particularly with regard to the audiovisual sector and the rights of authors and creators that are protected by copyright, this Regulation should be limited to cross-border portability of legally acquired content and should in no case extend to cross-border access to online content services in Member States where the provider of the online content service has no authorisation from the creators and right holders to make use of that content.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) The providers and holders of rights relevant for the provision of online content services should not be allowed to circumvent the application of this Regulation by choosing the law of a third country as the law applicable to contracts between them or to contracts between providers and subscribers.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Service providers should not be liable for breach of any contractual provisions contrary to the obligation to enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) Should a subscriber fail to provide the necessary information and the provider is unable to verify the Member State of residence as required under this Regulation as a result, the provider should not provide cross-border portability of the online content service to such a subscriber under this Regulation.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify upon subscription that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable, adapted to the nature of the online content service concerned and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose. Examples of the necessary technical and organisational measures may include sampling of IP address instead of constant monitoring of location, transparent information to the individuals about the methods used for the verification and its purposes, and appropriate security measures. Considering that for purposes of the verification what matters is not the location, but rather, in which Member State the subscriber is accessing the service, precise location data should not be collected and processed for this purpose. Similarly, where authentication of a subscriber is sufficient in order to deliver the service provided, identification of the
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) The list of verification means, provided for in this Regulation, aims to provide legal certainty as to the verification means to be used by service providers. In each case, account should be taken of a particular verification means in the given Member State and of the given type of online content service. Unless the Member State of residence can be established to a sufficient degree of certainty on the basis of a single verification means, providers should rely on a combination of these means. Furthermore, this Regulation should allow agreements between service providers and right holders as to which particular verification means could be used by providers. This should allow for flexibility as to the choice of the verification means. Such means should also be effective, reasonable and should not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the purpose of establishing the Member State of residence. However, holders of copyright and related rights, or other rights in content of online content services should remain able to permit their content to be accessed and used under this Regulation without verification of the Member State of residence provided they do so equally across all Member States. Right holders should be able to take such decisions freely and individually when entering into agreements with providers. Service providers may request the subscriber to provide necessary information in order to sufficiently authenticate or verify a subscriber's Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide such information and as a result the provider is unable to establish or verify the Member State of residence as required under this Regulation, the provider should not provide cross-border portability of online content service to this subscriber.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) In order to enable cross-border portability of online content services, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of establishing a non-exhaustive list of means for the verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, prepared and drawn up in consultation with industry, small right holders and consumer representatives. Such verification means should be the most appropriate in the relevant Member State and equivalent amongst Member States. This list may, for example, include a confirmed installation of a set top box, a local home bank account, a local electoral role or tax paying confirmation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making1a. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 1a OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) In order to enable cross-border portability of online content services, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of establishing a non-exhaustive list of means for the verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, prepared and drawn up in consultation with all relevant experts, including small right holders and consumers' rights organisations. Such verification means should be the most appropriate in the relevant Member State and equivalent amongst Member States. This list may, for example, include a confirmed installation of a set top box, a local home bank account, a local electoral role or tax paying confirmation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making1a. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 1a OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to property, including intellectual property rights, the freedom of expression and the freedom to conduct a business. Any processing of personal data under this Regulation should respect fundamental rights, including the right to respect for private and family life and the right to protection of personal data under Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) This Regulation should respect the obligations that the Union is subject to under international treaties protecting copyright and related rights, including the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) This Regulation does not affect the application of Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and in particular Title III of that Directive. The rules provided for in this Regulation are consistent with the objective facilitating the lawful access to content which is protected by copyright and related rights as well as services linked thereto. __________________ 1a Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi- territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 72).
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Contracts under which content is licensed are usually concluded for a relatively long duration. Consequently, and in order to ensure that all consumers residing in the Union can enjoy the cross- border portability feature of online content services on an equal basis in time and without any undue delay, this Regulation should also apply to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the cross-border portability of an online content service provided after that date. This is also necessary in order to ensure a level playing field for service providers operating in the internal market, by enabling providers who concluded contracts with right holders for a long duration to offer cross-border portability to their subscribers, independently of the provider's possibility to renegotiate such contracts. Moreover, this provision should ensure that when service providers make
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) As the Regulation will therefore apply to some contracts and rights acquired before the date of its application, it is also appropriate to provide for a reasonable period between the date of entry into force of this Regulation and the date of its application allowing right holders and service providers to make the arrangements necessary to adapt to the new situation, as well as allowing service providers to amend the terms of use of their services. Changes to the terms of use of online content services offered in packages combining an electronic communications service and an online content service made strictly in order to comply with this Regulation should not trigger any right for subscribers under national laws transposing the regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services to withdraw from contracts for the provision of such electronic communications services.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) (27a) In order to guarantee the proper implementation of the Regulation, to provide the online content service providers, the relevant right holders and the consumers with a national one-stop shop, and to allow the Commission to easily gather and exchange relevant data, the Member States should create or designate a body to follow the implementation of this Regulation. As this Regulation will affect the relationship between every actor on the value chain, it is also necessary that this body is able to receive and offer interpretation on possible disagreements emerging from the way in which the actors of the value chain implement this Regulation.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) In order to achieve the objective of ensuring cross-border portability of online content services in the Union, it is appropriate to adopt a regulation, which directly applies in Member States. This is necessary in order to guarantee a uniform application of the cross-border portability rules across Member States and their entering into force at the same time with regard to all online content services. Only a regulation ensures the degree of legal
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Th
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Therefore, this Regulation does not substantially affect the way the rights are licensed and does not oblige right holders and service providers to renegotiate contracts. Moreover, this Regulation does not require that the provider takes measures to ensure the quality of delivery of online content services outside the Member State of residence of the subscriber. Finally, this Regulation does not apply to service providers who offer services without payment of money and who do not
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to legally acquired online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State, can access and use these services, on the condition that the provider of online content services has verified the subscriber's Member State of residence.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a (a) "Subscriber" means any consumer who, on the basis of a contract for the provision of an online content service with
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point b (b) "Consumer" means any natural person
source: 582.405
2016/06/29
IMCO
238 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider sh
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement. The provider should provide its subscribers in advance with general information concerning the quality of delivery of an online content service in Member States other than the Member State of residence.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State . In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower to the extent that it does not discriminate on the basis of place of residence. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those service providers which lawfully provide portable online content services in the Member State of residence of subscribers are always entitled to provide such services to those subscribers when they are temporarily present in another Member State. This should be achieved by establishing that the provision, the access
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services which comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those service providers which lawfully provide portable online content services in the Member State of residence of subscribers are always entitled to provide such services to those subscribers when they are temporarily present in another Member State. This should be achieved by establishing that the provision, the access to and the use of such online content service should be deemed to occur in the Member State of the subscriber's residence. This should not prevent the service providers of online content from offering its subscribers who are temporarily present in another Member State online content that the online content service providers lawfully provide in that Member State of temporary presence.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those service providers which lawfully provide portable online content services in the Member State of residence of subscribers are always entitled to provide such services to those subscribers when they are temporarily present in another Member State. This should be achieved by establishing that the provision, the access to and the use of such online content service should be deemed to occur in the Member State of the subscriber's residence. This Regulation does not prevent a provider from offering its subscriber who is temporarily present in another Member State an online content service that the provider lawfully provides in that Member State.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) This Regulation, and in particular the legal mechanism localising the provision of, access to and the use of an online content service in the Member State of residence of the subscriber, should not prevent a provider from offering to a subscriber who is temporarily present in another Member State an online content service that the provider lawfully provides in that other Member State.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 b (new) (20b) Nothing in this Regulation should be interpreted as precluding a service provider from offering its services to a subscriber permanently located in another Member State.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) For the licensing of copyright and related rights, this means that relevant acts of reproduction, communication to the public and making available of works and
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22)
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Service providers should not be liable for breach of any contractual provisions contrary to the obligation to enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence. Therefore clauses in contracts designed to prohibit or limit the
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) This Regulation defines several concepts necessary for its application, including the Member State of residence. The Member State of residence should be determined taking into account the objectives of this Regulation and the need to ensure its uniform application in the Union. The definition of Member State of residence should imply that it is the Member State in which the subscriber habitually resides and to which he or she regularly returns after temporarily spending time in another country. A provider who has established the Member State of residence in accordance with this Regulation should be able to assume, for the purposes of this Regulation, that the Member State of residence as verified is the only Member State of residence of the subscriber. Providers should not be obliged to verify whether their subscribers are also subscribers to an online content service in another Member State.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) Member State of residence implies that the subscriber has actual and stable residence in the Member State to which he or she returns to regularly. For the purposes of this Regulation, a subscriber has only one Member State of residence. Service providers of online content should consider that that the Member State of residence verified and authenticated by said provider as part of this Regulation, is the sole Member State of residence. Providers should not be obliged to verify whether their subscribers are also subscribers to an online content service in another Member State.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Th
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is for the service provider to decide which verification method(s) to apply. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose. Examples of the necessary technical and organisational measures may include sampling of IP address instead of constant monitoring of location, transparent information to the individuals about the methods used for the verification and its purposes, and appropriate security measures. Considering that for purposes of the verification what matters is not the location, but rather, in which Member State the subscriber is accessing the service, precise location data should not be
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) This Regulation should oblige providers of online content services to subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence to use effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers upon subscription. The use of such means should at all times be reasonable, and should not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the purpose of establishing the subscriber's Member State of residence. To that end, providers should rely on the means of verification listed in this Regulation. The objective of that list should be to provide legal certainty as to the means of verification to be used by providers. In each case, account should be taken of the effectiveness of a particular means of verification in the Member State concerned and for the type of online content service concerned. Unless the Member State of residence can be established with sufficient certainty on the basis of a single means of verification, providers should rely on a combination of not more than two of those means. Once verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence has been completed, no further verification, re-verification, or additional means of verification should be required or requested from the subscriber by the provider.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Where the Member State of residence cannot be established to a reasonable degree of certainty on the basis of a single verification means, providers should rely on a combination of these means. This Regulation does not restrict agreements between service providers and rights holders as to which particular verification means based on the list provided could be used by providers. Rights holders should be able to take such decisions freely when entering into agreements with providers. Service providers may request the subscriber to provide information necessary in order to reasonably authenticate or verify a subscriber's Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide that information and in consequence the provider is unable to establish or verify the Member State of residence as required under this regulation, the provider should not provide cross-border portability of online content service to this subscriber.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Verifications means may include the implementation of currently used means for periodic checking of relevant information of IP addresses to the extent that this is necessary for the purposes of this Regulation. Considering that for purposes of the verification what matters is not the precise location, but rather the subscriber's temporary presence in another Member State while accessing the service, data on precise location or any other personal data should not be collected and processed for this purpose. Similarly, where authentication of a subscriber is sufficient on order to deliver the service provided, identification of the subscriber should not be required. The verification process should be carried according to privacy and data protection rules.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Verification means may include checking of IP addresses on the basis of random sampling instead of constant monitoring of location. Considering that for purposes of the verification what matters is not the precise location, but rather the subscriber’s temporary presence in another Member State while accessing the service, precise location data should not be collected and processed for this purpose. Similarly, where authentication of a subscriber is sufficient in order to deliver the service provided, identification of the subscriber should not be required.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) A provider who established the Member State of residence in accordance with this Regulation should be able to assume, for the purposes of this Regulation, that the verified Member State of residence is the only Member State of residence of the subscriber.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 b (new) (23b) However, holders of copyright, related rights, or other rights in the content provided by online content services should remain able to permit their content to be accessed and used under this Regulation without verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, particularly in sectors such as music and e-books. Holders of such rights should be able freely to take decisions in this regard when entering into agreements with providers. Agreements between right holders and providers should not restrict the ability of right holders to withdraw such permission on reasonable notice to the provider. In cases where the holders of copyright, related rights or other rights decide to permit their content to be accessed and used without verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, all other aspects of this Regulation should remain applicable.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 b (new) (23b) Verification means may include sampling of IP address instead of constant monitoring of location. Precise location data should not be collected, since this is not relevant for the purpose of verifying the Member State of residence of the subscriber.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 c (new) (23c) In order to take into account technological developments, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the list of effective means for the verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to property, including intellectual property rights, the freedom of expression and the freedom to conduct a business. Any processing of personal data under this Regulation should respect fundamental rights, including the right to respect for private and family life and the right to protection of personal data under Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and must be in compliance with Directives 95/46/EC27 and 2002/58/EC28 . In particular, service providers must ensure that any processing of personal data under this Regulation must be necessary and proportionate in order to achieve the relevant purpose. __________________ 27 Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31–50. 28 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the freedom of expression
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) The above principles should also apply to subscribers who are in a Member State other than their Member State of residence. In that case they should be informed about the necessary technical and organisational measures. The necessary technical and organisational measures should include their providing subscribers with transparent information about the methods and purposes of checking and taking appropriate safety precautions.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) This Regulation should not affect the application of the rules of competition, and in particular Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty. The rules provided for in this Regulation should not be used to restrict competition in a manner contrary to the Treaty. Nor shall this Regulation apply to online content services for which pan- European licences already exist under Directive 2014/26/EU.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Contracts under which content is licensed are usually concluded for a relatively long duration. Consequently, and in order to ensure that all consumers residing in the Union can enjoy the cross- border portability feature of online content services on an equal basis in time and without any undue delay, this Regulation should also apply to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the cross-border portability of an online content service provided after that date, with no additional costs to consumers. This is also necessary in order to ensure a level playing field for service providers operating in the internal market, especially important for start-ups and SME's, and by enabling providers who concluded contracts with rights holders for a long duration to offer cross-border portability to their subscribers, independently of the provider's possibility to renegotiate such contracts. Moreover, this provision should ensure that when service providers make arrangements necessary for the cross-
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) As the Regulation will therefore apply to some contracts and rights acquired before the date of its application, it is also appropriate to provide for a reasonable period between the date of entry into force of this Regulation and the date of its application allowing right holders and service providers to make the arrangements necessary to adapt to the new situation, as well as allowing service providers to amend the terms of use of their services. Changes to other terms of use of online content services offered in packages combining an electronic communications service made strictly in order to comply with the requirements of this Regulation should not trigger for subscribers any right under national laws transposing the regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services to withdraw from contracts for the provision of such electronic communications services.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) As th
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) In order to achieve the objective of ensuring cross-border portability of online content services in the Union, it is appropriate to adopt a regulation
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Therefore, this Regulation does not substantially affect the way the rights are licensed and does not oblige right holders and service providers to renegotiate contracts. Moreover, this Regulation does not require that the provider takes measures to ensure the quality of delivery of online content services outside the Member State of residence of the subscriber. Finally, this Regulation does not apply to service providers who offer services without payment of money and who do not
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, Protocol (No 1) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the role of national parliaments in the European Union and Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Therefore, this Regulation does not substantially affect the way the rights are licensed and does not oblige right holders and service providers to renegotiate contracts. Moreover, this Regulation does not require that the provider takes measures to ensure the quality of delivery of online content services outside the Member State of residence of the subscriber. Finally, this
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to legally acquired online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to portable online content services in the Union, when
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to portable online content services in the
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces within the Union a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State, can access and use these services with no additional costs.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State, can access and use these services at no additional cost.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) This Regulation applies to all online content services which are provided to a subscriber against payment of money.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) This Regulation is without prejudice to the Union law in the field of taxation.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 a (new) Article 1a Online content services provided without payment of money are also covered by the scope of the Regulation as long as the provider verifies the subscriber's Member State of residence.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) "Subscriber" means any consumer who, on the basis of a contract for the provision of an online content service with a provider,
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) "Consumer" means any natural person
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residing
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) “Member State of residence” means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State(s) where the subscriber is habitually residing;
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present in a Member State" means
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence that is limited to a certain period;
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) “Temporarily present in a Member State” means a presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence on a non-permanent basis;
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence for a limited period;
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence for a limited period of time;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence on a portable basis and which is an audiovisual media service within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU or a service the main feature of which is the provision of lawful access to and use of works
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence on a portable basis and which is an audiovisual media service
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence on a portable basis and which is an audiovisual media service within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU or a service the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of works, other protected subject matter or transmissions of broadcasting organisations, whether in a linear or an on- demand manner
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 1 (1) against payment of money, including a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting licence fee; or
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 2 Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 2 (2) without payment of money
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider in accordance with this Regulation;
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 2 (2) without payment of money
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) "Portable" means that subscribers can effectively access and use the online content service on a device that is easily carried in the Member State of residence without being limited to a specific location.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) "Portable" means that subscribers
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service provided against payment of money shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service subject to effective and proportionate means of authentication and verification in accordance with this Regulation.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of a
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service, in a manner respecting copyright and intellectual property rights.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service available in his Member State of residence without imposing additional costs.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State other than his or her Member State of residence to access and use the online content service.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State other than the Member State of residence to access and use the online content service.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service with no additional costs.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service at no additional cost.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) The application of this Regulation cannot be circumvented by virtue of the choice of the law of a non-member country as the law applicable to contracts signed between service providers and rights holders or to contracts between providers and subscribers.
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the possibility for the provider to enable a subscriber to additionally access the local repertoire that has been licenced to the service provider in the Member State of temporary presence.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3)
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall, where possible on the basis of the data available to the provider, inform the subscriber of the quality of delivery of the online content service provided in accordance with paragraph 1.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall inform the subscriber of any variation of the quality of delivery of the online content service provided in accordance with paragraph 1 prior to providing that service.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Article, and unless objective technical failures occur, providers of online content services shall guarantee to the subscriber temporarily present in a Member State other than that of residence the same level of quality that is provided to the subscribers habitually residing in the Member State where he or she is temporarily present.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the subscriber shall not be prevented from accessing his or her subscription with the same level of quality that is provided to the subscribers habitually residing in the Member State where he is temporarily present.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the possibility of the service provider allowing the subscriber to also access the content licensed to the service provider in the Member State where the subscriber is temporarily present.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may decide to allow its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the service in accordance with this Regulation. In order for the provisions of this Regulation to be applicable to providers in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, the provider shall verify the subscribers' Member State of residence in accordance with Article 3b. The provider shall inform subscribers, the relevant holders of copyright and related rights and those holding any other rights in the content of online content service of its decision to provide the online content service in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article prior to providing that service. The information shall be provided by means which are adequate and proportionate. If the provider chooses to provide the online content service in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, this Regulation shall apply to that provider.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The subscriber's habitual place of residence must be verified using flexible, reasonable, proportionate and straightforward methods, such as online localisation services or proof of change in mobile network provider.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Online service providers shall not limit the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of Article 3 on the basis of the use of any specific technology or devices.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new) Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new) Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 c (new) (3c) Compliance by service providers with the obligation of paragraph 1 does not give rise to additional remuneration rights for holders of copyright and those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Verification of the Member State of residence 1. The provider of an online content service that enables a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service shall make use of effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber. These means shall be reasonable and shall not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve their purpose. 2. In order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1, the provider shall rely on at least two of the following verification means: (a) an identity card or any other valid document confirming subscriber's Member State of residence; (b) the billing address or the postal address of the subscriber; (c) bank details such as the bank account or local credit or debit card of the subscriber; (d) the place of installation of a set top box or a similar device used for the supply of services to the subscriber; (e) the subscriber being a party to a contract for internet or telephone connection in the Member State; (f) the subscriber paying a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State, such as public service broadcasting; (g) sampling or periodic checking of the Internet Protocol (IP) address to identify the Member State where the subscriber accesses and uses the online content service or identifying that Member State by other means of geolocation. 3. The processing of personal data pursuant to the verification shall be carried out in compliance with Regulation 2016/679/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 4. The provider shall be entitled to request the subscriber to provide the information necessary for the verification of the Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide that information and consequently the provider is unable to effectively verify the Member State of residence, as required by this Regulation, the provider shall not, on the basis of this Regulation, enable the subscriber to access the online content service when she or he is temporarily present in a Member State.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Providers of online content without payment of money and the option to comply with this regulation (1) The providers of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service in accordance with this Regulation only where the provider verifies the subscribers Member State of residence in compliance with Article 3b. (2) The providers of an online content service provided without payment of money, shall inform subscribers, the relevant holders of copyright and related rights and those holding any other rights in the content of the online content service where they choose to apply this Regulation to the online content service. Such notification shall be given prior to the provisions of access and use of the online content service on a portable basis by means that are adequate and proportionate. (3) Where the provider chooses to offer an online content service in accordance with paragraph 1, this Regulation shall apply to that provider.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Option to enable portability The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service on the condition that the provider verifies effectively the subscriber's Member State of residence in accordance with this Regulation. The service provider shall inform subscribers, the relevant holders of copyright and related rights and those holding any other rights in the content of online content service of its decision to provide the online content service in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article prior to providing that service. The information shall be provided by means which are adequate and proportionate. If the provider chooses to provide the online content service in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, this Regulation shall apply to that provider entirely.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service in accordance with this Regulation on the condition that the provider verifies the subscriber's Member State of residence in accordance with Article 3b.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Article 3b Verification of the Member State of residence (1) The provider of an online content service provided against payment of money shall make use of effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of its subscribers. These verification means shall be reasonable, not intrusive, proportionate and shall not go beyond what is strictly necessary in order to achieve the purpose of this Regulation. These means shall not constitute an excessive burden for the subscribers. (2) In order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1, the provider shall rely on the following verification means: (a) a declaration by the subscriber on their Member State of residence; (b) any valid document confirming subscriber's Member State of residence; (c) the billing address or the postal address of the subscriber; (d) bank details such as bank account, local credit or debit card of the subscriber; (e) the place of installation of a set top box or a similar device used for supply of services to the subscriber; (f) the subscriber being a party to a contract for internet or telephone connection in the Member State; (g) the subscriber paying a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State, such as public service broadcasting; (h) currently used technical means for periodic checking of relevant information of IP addresses, to the extent that is strictly necessary for the purposes of this Regulation. (3) Unless the Member State of residence can be sufficiently established on the basis of a single verification means, the provider shall rely on a combination of such means. (4) The declaration of a subscriber on their Member State of residence shall only be used in combination with one or more other verification means. (5) The service provider shall not track the location of the subscriber by means of Internet Protocol (IP) sampling or other means of geolocation in order to comply with the obligation of paragraph 1 of Article 3.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Article 3b Verification of the Member State of residence (1) The service provider of an online content service shall verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber by means that are reasonable, non-intrusive and proportionate. These means shall not constitute an excessive burden on the subscriber. (2) In order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1, the provider shall rely on the following verification means: (a) an identity card or any other valid document confirming the subscriber's Member State of residence; (b) the billing address or the postal address of the subscriber; (c) bank details such as bank account, credit or debit card of the subscriber; (d) the subscriber being a party to a contract for an internet or telephone connection in the Member State. (3) The service provider may not be requested by holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services to request the subscriber to provide additional means of verification if the habitual residence has already been verified in compliance with paragraph 2. (4) If the member state of habitual residence of the subscriber has been verified according to paragraph 2, the service provider shall not track the location of the subscriber by means of Internet Protocol (IP) sampling or other similar technology in order to comply with the obligation of paragraph 1 of Article 3. (5) The use of cumulative verification mechanisms shall only be used if the online service provider demonstrates that the use of individual mechanisms is insufficient to verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber. If the provider chooses to provide the online content service in accordance with paragraph 1, this Regulation shall apply to that provider.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 c (new) Article 3c Technology neutrality Online service providers shall not limit the obligation set out in Article 3(1) on the basis of the use of any specific technology or devices.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Seamless access to online content services by consumers throughout the Union is important for the smooth functioning of the internal market. Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 The provision of an online content service
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) The first paragraph of this Article is without prejudice to the rights of a provider in the Member State where a subscriber is physically present. Nor shall it prevent the provider, if it so wishes, from granting access to content available in a Member State to a subscriber temporarily present in that Member State.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of and access to content in online content services and service providers, as well as between service providers and subscribers which are contrary to
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services and service providers, as well as between service providers and subscribers which are contrary to
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services and service providers, as well as between service providers and subscribers which are contrary to
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Contractual changes arising from the application of this Regulation shall not confer any right to withdraw from any contract or agreement, either between the subscriber and the provider or between the provider and a right holder. Amendments, adjustments or other contractual changes arising from the implementation of this Regulation shall not constitute a justifiable reason for the adjustment of charges, fees or rates, or for any other modification of the financial relations between the subscriber, the provider or any right holder.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the possibility of the service provider allowing the subscriber to also access the content licensed to the service provider in the Member State where the subscriber is temporarily present.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services cross border should be eliminated, on condition that copyright and intellectual property rights are respected.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may require that the service provider make use of
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may require that the service provider make use of
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2)
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) Any means agreed between right holders and service providers to verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber shall be reasonable, non- intrusive and not go beyond what is necessary to achieve their purpose in conformity with paragraph 1 of Article 3b.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) The provisions of this Regulation shall apply irrespective of the law applicable to contracts concluded between providers of online content services and holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights relevant for access to, and the use of, content in online content services or to contracts between such providers and their subscribers.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) The provisions of this Regulation shall apply irrespective of the law applicable to contracts concluded between providers of online content services and holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights relevant for the access to and use of content in online content services or to contracts between such providers and subscribers.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) Contractual provisions limiting the portability to a specific time period shall be unenforceable.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union for purposes such as holidays, travel or business trips. Therefore, barriers that hamper temporary access and use of such online content services cross border should be eliminated.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 b (new) (2b) The holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service may authorise the access to and use of their content under this Regulation without the verification of the Member State of residence, but otherwise in accordance with this Regulation. In such cases, the agreement between the provider and the subscriber for the provision of an online content service shall be sufficient to establish the subscriber's Member State of residence.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation including, in particular, for purposes of verification under Article 5(2), shall be carried out in compliance with
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Article 6a Monitoring and evaluation From 2017, in line with Article 5(1) of this Regulation, the Commission shall monitor possible amendments of the existing contractual arrangements. The monitoring shall pay particular attention to the impact on SMEs, the protection of personal data and to ensure that any possible renegotiations of contracts are in line with the objectives of this Regulation. A comprehensive evaluation shall take place 5 years from the date of application of this Regulation.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Article 6a Principle of technological neutrality Consumers must be free to choose the device or technology with which they wish to access online services.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 This Regulation shall apply also to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the provision, the access to and the use of an online content service in accordance with Articles 3 and 3a after that date.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 This Regulation shall apply also to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the provision, the access to and the use of an online content service in accordance with Articles 3 and 3a after that date.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and at three-year intervals thereafter, the Commission shall assess the application of this Regulation and submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the application of this Regulation. The report shall include, inter alia, an assessment of the effectiveness of the verification means of the Member State of residence, including newly developed industry standards and practices, and, if necessary, on the need for a review. The Commission's report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative or non-legislative proposal(s).
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the sin
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 3 (3b) shall be conferred on the Commission for indeterminate period of time from [date of entry into force of the basic legislative act or any other date set by the co-legislators]. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 3(3b) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 3(3b) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of [two months] of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [two months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Principle of technological neutrality Subscribers shall have the freedom to choose the type of device or technology from among those available on the market in order to access online content.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Principle of technology neutrality Consumers shall have the freedom to choose the type of device or technology from among those available on the market in order to access online content.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 b (new) Article 7b Evaluation Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation the Commission shall assess its implementation and report to the European Parliament and the Council. That report shall include an assessment of the verification of the Member State of residence, and, if necessary, on the need for a review. The report shall assess, in particular, whether or not there has been an increase in the prices charged to consumers. The Commission's report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers’ location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their home country but also when they are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union, since this is a question of consumer rights in the internal market.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their home country, which limits the right to access online services and is potentially prejudicial.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot continue accessing and us
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into both paid and non-paid contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their home country.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have legally acquired the right to use in their
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) A person should be deemed to be present not merely temporarily if they stay in the same place for at least six months, with the proviso that brief interruptions should be disregarded. A person should be deemed to be present temporarily if the stay is limited to a particular period of less than 6 months.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis as well as from the fact that online service providers may choose to serve specific markets only. Nonetheless, territorial licences play a key role in the financing and production of cultural content adapted to suit the different markets in the Union, especially in the audiovisual and film sphere, making a decisive contribution to European cultural diversity.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis as well as from the fact that online service providers may arbitrarily choose to serve specific markets only, thus depriving consumers of information and entertainment services.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law, including devices which facilitate content accessibility for certain categories. In particular, the obstacles to cross-
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected by copyright and/or related rights without substantially lessening the value of the service provided to consumers. This is especially the case with premium content such as sporting or other events of significant interest to consumers. In order to enable service providers to deliver to consumers, who are temporarily present in a Member States other than their Member State of residence, full access to their online content services, it is indispensable that this Regulation also covers such content used by online content services and therefore that it applies to audiovisual media services in the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU as well as to transmissions of broadcasting organisations in their entirety. In this regard, it is crucial to fulfil the commitment to achieve the target of minimum download speeds of 30 Mbps or more for all and 50% of the EU to be subscribed to broadband above 100 Mbps by 2020.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected by copyright and/or related rights without substantially lessening the value of the service provided to consumers. This is especially the case with premium content such as sporting or other events of significant interest to consumers. In order to enable service providers to deliver to consumers full access to their online content services for the duration of the temporary stay in a Member State other than the Member State of residence, it is indispensable that this Regulation also covers such content used by online content services and
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected by copyright and/or related rights without substantially lessening the value of the service provided to consumers. This is especially the case with premium content such as sporting or other events of significant interest to consumers. In order to enable service providers to deliver to consumers full access to their online content services when they are temporarily in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, it is indispensable that this Regulation also covers such content used by online content services and therefore that it applies to audiovisual media services in the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU as well as to transmissions of broadcasting organisations in their entirety.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The acquisition of a licence for the relevant rights is not always possible, notably when rights in content are licensed on an exclusive basis. In order to ensure the territorial exclusivity, online service providers often undertake, in their licence contracts with right holders, including broadcasting organisations or events organisers, to prevent their subscribers from accessing and using their service outside the territory for which the service provider holds the licence.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In addition, the Court held in Joined cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, Football Association Premier League and Others, EU:C:2011:631, that
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured. Open cross-border access is not the objective of this Regulation. Therefore, cross-border portability should be distinguished from open cross-border access.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured without any additional cost to the subscriber.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross-
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Since the objective of this Regulation is to increase consumers' access to the content they already have legal access to, regardless of their temporary presence in another Member state, no provision in this Regulation should limit the access to content already enjoyed by consumers today. Particularly, the legal fiction set out in Article 4 only applies to online content services that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence. It does not limit the possibility for a service provider to additionally provide subscribers access to the local repertoire offered by that service provider in the Member state of temporary presence. If a service provider operates in both the Member state of a subscriber's habitual residence and the Member state of temporary presence, the subscriber should have the option to access both repertoires.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) As portability applies to previously acquired online content, it should be understood as an essential component of cross-border access. Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is also to ensure cross-border access for private and public users such as libraries and educational and cultural projects and institutions that need to access online content while being present in another Member State.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Subscribers also often encounter difficulties when they wish to use their paid-for on-line content services in a Member State other than their Member State of residence.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) In any case a distinction shall be made between the portability of online content services and cross-border access thereto, which shall be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) This Regulation should not affect the application of any provision of the Union related to taxation.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content. A registration to receive content alerts or a mere acceptance of HTML cookies should not be regarded as a contract for the provision of online content service for the purposes of this Regulation. Online content services provided on the basis of pan-European licences under Directive 2014/26/EU shall also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content online. A registration to receive content alerts or a mere acceptance of HTML cookies should not be regarded as a contract for the provision of online content service for the
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) For the purposes of this Regulation, consumers may not state that they are habitually resident in more than one Member State.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is not appropriate to require service providers that do not offer portable services in their home country to do so across borders, except for services which aim to facilitate access to culture and remove digital barriers for persons with disabilities.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in their Member State of residence in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is not appropriate to require service providers that do not offer portable services within their
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location and device, as it is not appropriate to require service providers that do not offer portable services in their home country to do so across borders.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in their Member State
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in their Member State
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers and their temporary presence in another Member State. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider offering a package combining a telecommunications service and an online content service operated by another provider. The payment of a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting license fee should not be regarded as a payment of money to receive an online content service.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider offering a package combining a telecommunications service and an online content service operated by another provider. The payment of a universal mandatory fee such as a broadcasting license fee should not be regarded as a payment in the context of this Regulation.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money, including the payment of a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting fee. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly or indirectly to the provider of the online content service,
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Packages or bundles of online content services which are provided against payment of money may also host free-to-air content that may not be portable independently from the package or bundle. Insofar as such free-to-air content is not separable and is provided within packages or bundles, these services are covered in their entirety by this regulation.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Since the Regulation is mandatory for all online services provided against payment of money, verification of habitual residence based on the means of payment should in any case be considered sufficient, in order to provide service providers with an easily implementable, effective, non-intrusive and proportionate means of verification.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, information such as
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, information such as a payment of a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State of residence, the existence of a contract for internet or telephone connection
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence. Th
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore,
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement. Providers of online content services should provide subscribers advance notification concerning any variation in the quality that may be delivered or experienced when accessing content in a Member State other than the Member State of residence. Such information could be provided on the provider's website.
source: 585.575
2016/08/01
ITRE
134 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residing where he/she returns to after a temporary presence in another country;
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residing determined and verified during the process of subscription;
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence, whatever the effective duration of such presence, provided that the Member State of residence was verified in accordance with article 2 - paragraph 1 - point e - subparagraph 2 - point 2;
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present in a Member State" means
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a presence, for a limited period of time, of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence;
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present in a Member State" means a
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 1 (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 1 (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online in
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 1 (1) against payment of money including a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting licence fee;; or
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider based on online declaration by the subscriber on their Member State of residence or the fiscal residence of the subscriber or on the possession of an identity card or billing and postal address or bank details or any other valid document that confirms the subscriber's residence;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider on the basis of electronic identification means, in particular notified eIDs in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider in accordance with this Regulation;
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is effectively verified by the provider;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) "Portable" means that subscribers can effectively access and use the online content service on a device that is easily carried in the Member State of residence without being limited to a specific location.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) "Portable" means that subscribers can effectively access and use the online content service
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service provided against payment of money shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service subject to the payment of money or without payment of money but subject to prior verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service against payment of money shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service for which user has a legal subscription.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service, without additional costs.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Provision of portable services should not be conditioned by additional technical requirements and shall be done under a technologically neutral and interoperable hardware and software environment.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Verification of the Member State of residence 1. The provider of an online content service that enables a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service shall make use of effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of the subscriber. These means shall be reasonable and shall not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve their purpose. 2. In order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1, the provider shall rely on at least two of the following verification means: (a) an identity card or any other valid document confirming subscriber's Member State of residence; (b) the billing address or the postal address of the subscriber; (c) bank details such as the bank account or local credit or debit card of the subscriber; (d) the place of installation of a set top box or a similar device used for the supply of services to the subscriber; (e) the subscriber being a party to a contract for internet or telephone connection in the Member State; (f) the subscriber paying a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State, such as public service broadcasting; (g) sampling or periodic checking of the Internet Protocol (IP) address to identify the Member State where the subscriber accesses and uses the online content service or identifying that Member State by other means of geolocation; 3. The processing of personal data pursuant to the verification shall be carried out in compliance with Regulation 2016/679/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 4. The provider shall be entitled to request the subscriber to provide the information necessary for the verification of the Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide that information and consequently the provider is unable to effectively verify the Member State of residence, as required by this Regulation, the provider shall not, on the basis of this Regulation, enable the subscriber to access the online content service when she or he is temporarily present in a Member State.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3 a Providers of online content without payment of money and the option to comply with this regulation (1) The Providers of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service in accordance with this Regulation only where the provider verifies the subscribers Member State of residence in compliance with Article 3b. (2) The Providers of an online content service provided without payment of money, shall inform subscribers, the relevant holders of copyright and related rights and those holding any other rights in the content of the online content service where they choose to apply this Regulation to the online content service. Such notification shall be given prior to the provisions of access and use of the online content service on a portable basis by means that are adequate and proportionate. (3) Where the provider choose to offer an online content service in accordance with paragraph 1, this Regulation shall apply to that provider.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a 1. The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may decide to allow its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State to access the service in accordance with this Regulation. 2. In order for the provisions of this Regulation to be applicable to providers in accordance with paragraph 1, the provider shall verify the subscribers’ Member State of residence as required by this Regulation.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The provision of an online content service
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services and service providers, as well as those between service providers and subscribers which
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 (1) Any contractual provisions including those between holders of copyright and related rights, those holding any other rights relevant for the use of content in online content services and service providers, as well as between service providers and subscribers which are contrary to
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2)
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with Article 3(1), provided that the required means fall under due diligence, are reasonable
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with Article 3(1), provided that the required means are non-intrusive for consumers, highly respectful of their privacy rights, non-burdensome for providers, reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve their purpose.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph 1, holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of online content services may
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall apply also to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the provision, the access to and the use of an online content service in accordance with Article 3 and 3A after that date.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Application of the principles of technology neutrality and cross-device portability Subscribers shall have complete freedom to choose the types of devices or technologies from those available on the Union market in order to access online content, and to change freely between them, provide that it is guaranteed that in every moment they are accessing to their subscription whilst expecting the maximum number of devices specified in their service contract.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation the Commission shall assess the implementation of this Regulation and submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on this. The report shall assess, in particular, whether or not there has been a significant variation in the revenues of right holders and prices charged to consumers.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a The Commission shall, not later than on 3 years review the application of this Regulation and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council. The Commission should pay particular attention to whether the solutions created and implemented have a positive or a negative impact on development of Digital Single Market.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 b (new) Article 7b Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 3b(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from...1 a. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 3b(3) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that Decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 3b(3) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of [two months] of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [two months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. _________________ 1aDate of entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 b (new) Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services cross border should be eliminated, as smooth, unfettered access for consumers to online audiovisual content throughout the Union is key to the smooth functioning of the digital single market.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union for purposes such as holidays, travel or business trips. Therefore, barriers that hamper temporary access and use of such online content services cross border should be eliminated.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services cross border should be eliminated swiftly and by 2018 at the latest.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into paid as well as unpaid contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their home country.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis as well as from the fact that online service providers may choose to serve specific markets only
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected by copyright and/or related rights without substantially lessening the value of the service provided to consumers. This is especially the case with premium content such as sporting or other events of significant interest to consumers. In order to enable service providers to deliver to consumers, who are temporarily present in a Member States other than their Member State of residence, full access to their online content services, it is indispensable that this Regulation also covers such content used by online content services and therefore that it applies to audiovisual media services in the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU as well as to transmissions of broadcasting organisations in their entirety. In this regard, it is crucial to fulfil the commitment to achieve the target of minimum download speeds of 30 Mbps or more for all and 50% of the EU to be subscribed to broadband above 100 Mbps by 2020.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The provision of online content services for consumers temporarily present in another Member State can be hampered by the lack of infrastructure. In this context it is noteworthy that the Member States have committed to achieve the targets for minimum download speeds of 30 Mbps by 2020 in order to meet the conditions relating to high connectivity for all. In order to achieve this goal and due to the fact that rapidly growing wireless broadband traffic makes enhanced wireless network capacity a necessity, it will be of outmost importance to achieve a stronger pan European approach for spectrum management across the EU.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The existence of telecommunication networks with a sufficient minimum performance is a prerequisite for making possible cross- border portability, as well as many other features of a Digital Single Market. In this context, it is essential that Member States shall fully meet their commitment to guarantee minimum download speeds of 30 Mbps by 2020 for all the territory of the Union, in order to provide reasonable connectivity for all European citizens.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In the context of infrastructure development, it is noteworthy that the Member States have committed to achieve the targets for minimum download speeds of 30 Mbps by 2020 in order to meet the conditions relating to high connectivity for all.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) Issues at the infrastructure level can also lead to artificial barriers for portability, especially for small or isolated communities, therefore measures to ensure it should also include further deployment of appropriate infrastructures and support for technological neutrality and interoperability.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured. In order not to compromise the current financing system of the audio-visual sector, which might cause a loss both in revenues and in the cultural diversity of the offer, this Regulation should not substantially alter the territorial principle. It should not be possible to interpret portability as open cross-border access.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured without additional costs for the customer, monetary or of any other kind, or any additional significant burden for the provider.
Amendment 46 #
(12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured without additional licensing costs to consumers.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of Digital Single Market Strategy and of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured without additional licensing costs.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured without additional costs.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) In order to avoid both inconsistency with the current rules in the field of taxation and disproportionate administrative burdens, this Regulation should not affect the application of any provision related to taxation.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) In any case, a distinction shall be made between the portability of online content services and cross-border access thereto, which shall be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content. A registration to receive content alerts or a mere acceptance of HTML cookies should not be regarded as a contract for the provision of online content service for the purposes of this Regulation. Online content services provided on the basis of pan-European licences under Directive 2014/26/EU shall also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content. A registration to receive content alerts
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, applications, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content. A registration to receive content alerts or a mere acceptance of HTML cookies should not be regarded as a contract for the provision of online content service for the purposes of this Regulation.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is not appropriate to require service providers that
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is not appropriate to require service providers that do not offer portable services in the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money, either through a service contract or through a compulsory television or broadcasting residence-based licence fee. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers or licensees. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly to
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money including the payment of a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting fee. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly or indirectly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Nowadays, numerous content services and other kinds of services offered online are provided to subscribers in return for a non-monetary counterprestation (e.g. personal navigation data, or other). It is sometimes implied that since in such a situation there is not monetary payment, the subscriber enjoys less rights than in a pay-for-subscribe agreement. Full and effective completion of the Digital single market will likely result in a situation in which its authorities will be called upon to regulate, in the public interest, such provider-subscriber agreements. The Commission should therefore bear this aspect in mind for the development and review of this Regulation.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence,
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) The only criterion for determining where a subscriber is resident for the purposes of this Regulation is the habitual residence of that subscriber. Criteria for determining residence set out in other pieces of legislation should not be used to interpret the concept in this Regulation, unless absolutely necessary.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence without prejudice to the possibility to access the local version of the content available in the Member State of temporary presence. This obligation is mandatory and therefore the parties may not exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect. Any action by a service provider which would prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery, would amount to a circumvention of the obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services and therefore would be contrary to this Regulation.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence. This obligation is mandatory and therefore the parties may not exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect, either through any contractual clause or unilaterally by the service provider. Any action by a service provider which would prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery, would amount to a circumvention of the obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services and therefore would be contrary to this Regulation.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence. This obligation is mandatory and therefore the parties may not exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect. Any action by a service provider which would prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State other than the Member State of residence, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery, would amount to a circumvention of the obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services and therefore would be contrary to this Regulation.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower, provided that the quality loss can be clearly attributed to objective reasons such as poor performance of the local network infrastructure. The service provider should however inform the consumer of the possible reduction in quality. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. The service provider should however inform the consumer at the subscription stage of the possible limitation in quality. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower than that of a quality of the Member State of residence as technological development vary across the Union. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower to the extent that it does not discriminate on the basis of place of residence. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that providers of online content services comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those service providers which lawfully provide portable online content services in the Member State of residence of
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Service providers should not be liable for breach of any contractual provisions contrary to the obligation to enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence. Therefore clauses in contracts designed to prohibit or limit the cross- border portability of online content services should be unenforceable. Neither the service providers nor the holders of rights relevant for the provision of online content services should be allowed to circumvent this Regulation through the choice of the law of a non-member country as the law applicable to contracts concluded between them or to contracts concluded between providers and subscribers.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Service providers should not be liable for breach of any contractual provisions contrary to the obligation to enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence. Therefore clauses in contracts designed to prohibit or limit the cross- border portability of online content services should be
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions and the extent of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose. Examples of the necessary technical and organisational measures may include sampling of IP address instead of constant monitoring of location, transparent information to the individuals about the methods used for the verification and its purposes, and appropriate security measures. Considering that for purposes of the verification what matters is not the location, but rather, in which Member State the subscriber is accessing the service, precise location data should not be collected and processed for this purpose. Similarly, where authentication of a subscriber is sufficient in order to deliver the service provided, identification of the subscriber should not be required.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) For the purposes of this Regulation, a consumer cannot claim his habitual residence in more than one Member State. In order to determine their subscribers’ Member State of residence, providers should rely on a list of verification means which are considered effective and proportionate.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) For the purposes of this Regulation, consumers may not state that they are habitually resident in more than one Member State.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 b (new) (23b) In order to take due account of the needs of industry and consumers, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendment of the list of means for the verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016¸on Better Law-Making1 a . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 1a * OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p.1.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to property, including intellectual property rights, the freedom of expression and the freedom to conduct a
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) This Regulation should not affect the application of the rules of competition, and in particular Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty. The rules provided for in this Regulation should not be used to restrict competition in a manner contrary to the Treaty. Nor shall this Regulation apply to online content services for which pan- European licences already exist under Directive 2014/26/EU.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Contracts under which content is licensed are usually concluded for a relatively long duration. Consequently, and in order to ensure that all consumers residing in the Union can enjoy the cross- border portability feature of online content services on an equal basis in time and without any undue delay, this Regulation should also apply to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the cross-border portability of an online content service provided after that date. Such ex-post applicability should not involve any additional costs for the customer, monetary or of any other kind, nor any significant additional burden for the provider. This is also necessary in order to ensure a level playing field for service providers operating in the internal market, by enabling providers who concluded contracts with right holders for a long duration to offer cross-border portability to
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Contracts under which content is licensed are usually concluded for a relatively long duration. Consequently, and in order to ensure that all consumers residing in the Union can enjoy the cross- border portability feature of online content services on an equal basis in time and without any undue delay, this Regulation should also apply to contracts concluded
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State, can access and use these services without incurring in any additional costs or administrative burdens.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to portable online content services in the
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State other than Member State of residence, can access and use these services.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) "Subscriber" means any consumer who, on the basis of a contract for the provision of an online content service with a provider, conditioned or not by a payment of money, may access and use such service in the Member State of residence;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) "Subscriber" means any consumer
source: 583.956
2016/10/03
JURI
205 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence. This obligation is mandatory and therefore the parties may not exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect. Any action by a service provider which would prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery, would amount to a circumvention of the obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services and therefore would be contrary to this Regulation. However, online content service providers may continue carrying out activities for information purposes to fight against unauthorised access to or use of online content services and against possible violations of copyright and related rights during content distribution.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services it is necessary to require
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) In order to ensure the cross-border portability of legally acquired online content services it is necessary to require that online service providers enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence by providing them access to the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence. This obligation is mandatory and therefore the parties may not exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect. Any action by a service provider which would prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery, would amount to a circumvention of the obligation to enable cross-border portability of online content services and therefore would be contrary to this
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) For the purposes of this Regulation, consumers should only be eligible if their habitual residence is in an EU Member State.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider sh
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly agrees to guarantee certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in other Member States, the provider shall be bound by such agreement. Moreover, the provider should inform the subscriber on the quality of delivery of the online content service when accessed and used in a Member State other than the Member State of residence.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in Member States other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for service providers and thus ultimately for subscribers. Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that the provider of an online content service take measures to ensure quality of delivery of such services beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State. In such cases the provider shall not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower. Nevertheless, if the provider expressly
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) This Regulation should not be interpreted as restricting a service provider from offering its services to a customer permanently located in another Member State, provided that the necessary licences have been acquired in accordance with Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council 2001/29/EC1a and 2014/26/EU1b and that they have authorisation from the rightholders to use their content. _______________________ 1aDirective 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10). 1b Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 72).
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) This Regulation, and in particular the legal mechanism localising the provision of, the access to and the use of an online content service in the Member State of residence of the subscriber, should not prevent a provider from offering to a subscriber who is temporarily present in another Member State an online content service that the provider lawfully provides in that other Member State.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 b (new) (20b) Nothing in this Regulation should be interpreted as precluding a provider from offering its online content services to a subscriber who is permanently located in another Member State.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) For the licensing of copyright and related rights, this means that relevant acts of reproduction, communication to the public and making available of works and other protected subject-matter, as well as the acts of extraction or re-utilization in relation to databases protected by sui generis rights, which occur when the service is provided to subscribers when they are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, should be deemed to occur in the subscribers' Member State of residence. The service providers, therefore, should be deemed to carry out such acts on the basis of the respective authorisations from the right holders concerned for the Member State of residence of these subscribers. Whenever service providers can carry out acts of communication to the public or reproduction in the Member State of the subscriber on the basis of an authorisation from the right holders concerned, a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State other than his Member State of residence should be able to access and use the service and where necessary carry out any relevant acts of reproduction such as downloading which he would be entitled to do in his own Member State of residence.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Service providers should not be liable for breach of any contractual provisions contrary to the obligation to enable their subscribers to use the service in the Member State of their temporary presence. Therefore clauses in contracts designed to prohibit or limit the cross- border portability of online content services should be unenforceable. Moreover, choosing the law of a third country as the law applicable to contracts entered into by service providers or holders of rights or to contracts involving subscribers should not, in any way, lead to the circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation. Therefore, this Regulation should function as a tool to protect subscribers and ensure the cross-border portability of online content services in the EU internal market.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Service providers should not be liable for breach of any contractual provisions contrary to the obligation to
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22)
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22)
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) This Regulation defines several concepts necessary for its application, including that of Member State of residence. The Member State of residence should be determined taking into account the objectives of this Regulation and the need to ensure its uniform application in the Union. The definition of Member State of residence should provide that it is the Member State in which the subscriber habitually resides. A provider who has determined the Member State of residence in accordance with this Regulation should be able to assume, for the purposes of this Regulation, that the Member State of residence as verified is the only Member State of residence of the subscriber. Providers should not be obliged to verify whether their subscribers are also subscribers to an online content service in another Member State.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) This Regulation defines several concepts which are necessary for its application, including that of Member State of residence. The Member State of residence should be determined, taking into account the objectives of this Regulation and the need to ensure its uniform application within the Union. Regarding current and future arrangements related to online content services, the provision of portability to subscribers temporarily present in another Member State should not give rise to any special contractual provisions, especially with regard to a certain time limit during which service providers grant portable access to their online content services across the Union.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) Member State of residence implies that the subscriber has a stable residence in the Member State to which he or she returns regularly. For the purposes of this Regulation, a subscriber has one Member State of residence.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Th
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. The Regulation enables right holders to require that the service provider make use of effective means in order to verify that the online content service is provided in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary, however, to ensure that the required means are reasonable and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this purpose.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Th
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Th
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Service providers should ensure that their subscribers are properly informed about the conditions of enjoyment of online content services in Member States other than the Member State of residence of the subscribers. Th
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) This Regulation should oblige providers of online content services to subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence to use effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers upon subscription. The use of such means should at all times be reasonable, and should not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the purpose of establishing the subscriber's Member State of residence. To that end, providers should rely on the means of verification listed in this Regulation. The objective of that list should be to provide legal certainty as to the means of verification to be used by providers. In each case, account should be taken of the effectiveness of a particular means of verification in the Member State concerned and of the type of online content service concerned. Unless the Member State of residence can be determined with sufficient certainty on the basis of a single means of verification, providers should rely on a combination of not more than two of those means. Once verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence has been completed, no further verification, re-verification, or additional means of verification should be required or requested from the subscriber by the provider.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) 23a. Verification methods may include those currently used for regular checking of relevant information relating to IP addresses to the extent that this is strictly necessary for the purposes of this Regulation. Since, for the purposes of the checks, what matters is not the precise location but rather the subscriber's temporary presence in another Member State while accessing the service, data on precise location or any other personal data should not be collected or processed for this purpose. Similarly, where authentication of a subscriber is enough to deliver the relevant service, identification of the subscriber should not be required. The verification process should be carried out in accordance with privacy and data protection rules.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) The provider of an online content service may request the subscriber to provide information necessary in order to sufficiently verify the subscriber's Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide that information and as a consequence, the provider is unable to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence as required under this Regulation, the provider should not provide cross-border portability of the online content service concerned to that subscriber under this Regulation.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) If the subscriber fails to provide the information required by the service provider for the purpose of verification and as a consequence the service provider is unable to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence as required under this Regulation, the service provider should not provide cross-border portability of the online content service concerned to that subscriber under this Regulation.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) To this end, providers of online content services should apply the verification criteria set out in this Regulation to provide effective verification and legal certainty. If an online content service provider cannot effectively proceed with this verification, portability cannot be offered to a subscriber.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 b (new) (23b) However, holders of copyright, related rights, or other rights in the content provided by online content services should remain able to permit their content to be accessed and used under this Regulation without verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, particularly in sectors such as music and e-books. Holders of such rights should be able freely to take decisions in this regard when entering into agreements with providers. Agreements between rightholders and providers should not restrict the ability of rightholders to withdraw such permission on reasonable notice to the provider. In cases where the holders of copyright, related rights or other rights decide to permit their content to be accessed and used without verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, all other aspects of this Regulation should remain applicable.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 b (new) 23b. Holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service should have a right to be informed of the verification process used by the service provider to establish a subscriber’s Member State of residence.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the freedom of expression and the freedom to conduct a business. Any processing of personal data under this Regulation should respect fundamental rights, including the right to respect for private and family life and the right to protection of personal data under Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and must be in compliance with Directives
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to property, the freedom of expression
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) The application of this Regulation will improve competitiveness by fostering innovation in online content services and attracting more consumers to them, without, however, affecting international trade. This Regulation should not affect the application of the rules of competition, and in particular Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty. The rules provided for in this Regulation should not be used to restrict competition in a manner contrary to the Treaty.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) This Regulation should not affect the application of Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and in particular Title III thereof relating to multi-territorial licensing of online rights. This Regulation is fully consistent with the objective of facilitating the lawful access to content, which is protected by copyright and related rights, as well as services linked thereto. ____________________ 1a Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 72).
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Contracts under which content is licensed are usually concluded for a relatively long duration. Consequently, and in order to ensure that all consumers residing in the Union can enjoy the cross- border portability feature of online content services on an equal basis in time and without any undue delay, this Regulation should also apply to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the cross-border portability of an online content service provided after that date. This is also necessary in order to ensure a level playing field for service providers operating in the internal market, by enabling providers who concluded contracts with right holders for a long duration to offer cross-border portability to their subscribers, independently of the provider's possibility to renegotiate such contracts. Moreover, this provision should ensure that when service providers make arrangements necessary for the cross- border portability of their services, they will be able to offer such portability with regard to the entirety of their online content. This provision should also apply to providers of online content services offered in packages combining electronic communications services and online content services. Finally, it should also allow right holders not having to renegotiate their existing licensing contracts in order to enable the offering of the cross-border portability of services by providers.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Contracts under which content is licensed are usually concluded for a relatively long duration. Consequently, and in order to ensure that all consumers residing in the Union can enjoy the cross- border portability feature of online content services on an equal basis in time and without any undue delay, this Regulation should also apply to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the cross-border portability of an online content service provided after that date. This is also necessary in order to ensure a level playing field for service providers operating in the internal market, by enabling providers who concluded contracts with right holders for a long duration to offer cross-border portability to their subscribers, independently of the provider's possibility to renegotiate such contracts. Moreover, this provision should ensure that when service providers make arrangements necessary for the cross- border portability of their services, they will be able to offer such portability with regard to the entirety of their online content. Finally, it should also allow right holders not having to renegotiate their existing licensing contracts in order to enable the offering of the cross-border portability of services by providers. The legal fiction established in Article 4 shall be deemed to occur without altering the territorial scope of the rights contractually acquired by the service provider.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26a) While this Regulation is concerned exclusively with the usage of content where the user is temporarily present in another Member State, nothing contained therein should be construed as preventing the introduction of a system of cross- border access, nor as specifically defending a system of territoriality.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) As th
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) As th
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) As the Regulation will therefore apply to some contracts and rights acquired
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) 27a. Member States should create or designate a body with responsibility for monitoring the application of this Regulation, in order to guarantee that it is applied properly, to provide the online content service providers, the relevant rights holders and consumers with a national one-stop shop, and to enable the Commission to easily gather and exchange relevant data. In view of the impact of this Regulation along the whole value chain, that body also needs to be able to receive and offer interpretation on possible disagreements that may arise regarding the way in which this Regulation is applied. The body would have an obligation to report regularly to the Commission on disputes that might be caused by the implementation of the Regulation in order to help it to draft its guidelines.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) In order to achieve the objective of ensuring cross-border portability of online content services in the Union, it is appropriate to adopt a regulation, which directly applies in Member States. This is necessary in order to guarantee a uniform application of the cross-border portability rules across Member States and their entering into force at the same time with regard to all online content services. Only a regulation ensures the degree of legal certainty which is necessary in order to enable consumers to fully benefit from cross-border portability across the Union and also to guarantee that right holders and online service providers from different Member States are subject to the exact same rules.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) In order to achieve the objective of ensuring cross-border portability of online content services in the Union, it is appropriate to adopt a regulation
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, Protocol (No 1) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the role of national parliaments in the European Union and Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Therefore, this Regulation does not substantially affect the way the rights are licensed and does not oblige right holders and service providers to renegotiate contracts. Moreover, this Regulation does not require that the provider takes measures to ensure the quality of delivery of online content services outside the Member State of residence of the subscriber. Finally, this Regulation does not apply to service providers who offer services without payment of money and who do not verify the subscriber's Member State of residence. Therefore, it does not impose any
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Therefore, this Regulation does not substantially affect the way the rights are licensed and does not oblige right holders and service providers to renegotiate contracts. Moreover, this Regulation does not require that the provider takes measures to ensure the quality of delivery of online content services outside the Member State of residence of the subscriber. Finally, this Regulation does not apply to service providers who offer services without payment of money and who do not
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the adaptation and harmonisation of the legal framework so that cross-border portability of online content services is provided in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective. Therefore, this Regulation does not substantially affect the way the rights are licensed and does not oblige right holders and service providers to renegotiate contracts. Moreover, this Regulation does not require that the provider takes measures to ensure the quality of delivery of online content services outside the Member State of residence of the subscriber. Finally, this Regulation does not apply to service providers who offer services without payment of money and who do not verify the subscriber's Member State of residence. Therefore, it does not impose any disproportionate costs,
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the single market to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State, other than the Member State of residence, can
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, can access and use these services.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation introduces a common approach to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union, when temporarily present in a Member State, can access and use these services, at no additional costs.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) Online content services provided without payment of money are also covered by this Regulation as long as the provider verifies the subscriber's Member State of residence.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Regulation applies to all online content services provided to a subscriber against payment of money.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 b (new) This Regulation also applies to online content services provided without payment of money as long as the service provider has chosen to enable his subscribers, who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, to access and use the online content service in question and as long as he verifies the subscriber's Member State of residence in accordance with Article 3b.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a (a) "Subscriber" means any consumer who, on the basis of a contract for the provision of an online content service with a provider,
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residing at least 183 days a year;
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State where the subscriber is domiciled or habitually residing;
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) “Member State of residence” means the Member State where the subscriber
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State(s) where the subscriber is habitually residing;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) "Member State of residence" means the Member State
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a transient presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence, for one or more limited periods of time during a year;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a presence without any time limitation of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence;
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means a non-permanent presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) “Temporarily present
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) "Temporarily present" means
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e (e) "Online content service" means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that a service provider is lawfully providing online
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – introductory part which is provided to a subscriber
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 1 (1) against payment of money, including a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting licence fee; or
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) free of charge, without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider, should the provider who provides online content services free of charge decide to ensure cross-border portability;
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider on the basis of electronic identification means, in particular notified eIDs in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the provider of the online content service decides to do so and the subscriber’s Member State of residence is verified by the provider;
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that provider has decided to offer portability and the subscriber's Member State of residence is verified by the provider;
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (2) without payment of money provided that the provider has undertaken measures to verify the subscriber's Member State of residence
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 (1) The provider of an online content service shall enable a subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State to access and use the online content service without additional costs.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the possibility for a service provider to allow a subscriber to also access and use the content licensed to the service provider in the Member State where the subscriber is temporarily present.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the possibility for the provider to enable a subscriber to additionally access the local repertoire that has been licenced to the service provider in the Member State of temporary presence.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 (3) The provider of an online content service shall inform the subscriber of the quality of delivery of the online content service provided in accordance with paragraph 1, provided that information is available to this end. This information shall be provided through appropriate and proportional means.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, and unless objective technical failures occur, providers of online content services shall guarantee to the subscriber who is temporarily present in a Member State other than his or her Member State of residence the same level of quality that is provided to the subscribers habitually residing in the Member State in which he or she is temporarily present.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The portability of online content services shall not be limited by the service provider to certain specific technologies or devices.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Online service providers shall not limit the obligation set out in Article 3(1) on the basis of the use of any specific technology or devices.
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Contractual provisions limiting the portability to a specific time period shall be deemed unenforceable.
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Verification of the Member State of residence 1. Providers of online content services made available in return for payment and providers of online content services made available free of charge who have opted to make their services portable shall use effective means to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. These means shall be reasonable and shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that purpose. 2. In order to comply with the obligations laid down in paragraph 1, the online content service provider shall use a combination of at least two of the following verification criteria: a) an identity card, electronic identity card or any other valid document confirming the subscriber’s Member State of residence; b) banking details such as the bank account or credit/debit card details of the subscriber in his or her Member State of residence; c) the location of a decoder or any other data carrier used by the subscriber to access the online content services concerned; d) an internet or telephone contract or any other type of contract linking the subscriber to a Member State; e) evidence of a payment made by the subscriber for other services provided in the relevant Member State, such as a public service broadcasting fee; f) proof of payment of local taxes, if this information is publicly available; g) any other verification criteria that afford at least the same level of security as the previous criteria, having been previously agreed between the online content service provider and the rights- holder, provided that it does not call the current contract into question. 3. The provider of online content services is entitled to request that the subscriber provide the information necessary for the verification of his or her Member State of residence. If the subscriber fails to provide the information required by the online content service provider to verify his or her Member State of residence, the provider has the right to refuse to offer him or her portability of its online content services as provided for in Article 3(1) as long as the provider is unable to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence by means of the criteria listed in Article 3a(2).
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3 a Verification of the Member State of residence 1. Providers of online content service provided against payment of money shall make use of effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of its subscribers. These means shall be reasonable and not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve their purpose. 2. In order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1, the provider shall rely on the following verification means, or equivalent means as agreed between rights holders and service providers; (a) an identity card or any other valid document confirming subscriber's Member State of residence, to include electronic identification means; (b) the billing address or postal address of the subscriber; (c) bank details such as bank account, local credit or debit card of the subscriber; (d) physical visitation to the place of installation of a set top box or a similar device used for supply of services to the subscribers; (e) a subscriber being party to a contract for internet or telephone connection in the member state of residence; (f) payment of a license fee by a subscriber for other services provided in the Member state of residence; (g) sampling or periodic checking of Internet Protocol (IP) address to identify where the subscriber accesses content and predominantly uses the online content service be it internal or external to the Member State of residence, or by other geo-locational means equivalent to this; (h) registration on national, regional or local electoral rolls, if publicly available; or (i) the payment of national, regional or local/poll taxes, if available. Unless the Member State of residence can be sufficiently established on the basis of a single verification means, the provider shall rely on a combination of such means. 3. The provider and the holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service may agree, in order to take account of new technological developments, any other means of equivalence in accordance with paragraph 1 to verify the Member state of residence. 4 Online content service providers, using the means in paragraph 2, shall ensure subscribers are demonstrating regular return in predominantly accessing content within the Member State of residence. 5. The provider shall be entitled to request the subscriber to provide such information as is necessary for the verification of the Member State of residence in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 4. If the subscriber fails to provide such adequate information as to determine the Member State of residence the provider shall prevent the subscriber from accessing or using the online content service when he or she is temporarily present in a Member State other than the Member State of residence.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Verification methods 1. Providers of online content services provided in return for payment and providers of online content services provided free of charge shall use effective means to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Those means shall be reasonable and shall not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that purpose. 2. In order to comply with the obligations laid down in paragraph 1, providers of online content services shall use any one criterion selected from among the following verification criteria: (a) an identity card, electronic identity card or any other valid document confirming the subscriber's Member State of residence; (b) banking particulars such as the bank account or credit or debit card of the subscriber in his or her Member State of residence; (c) the place of installation of a decoder or any similar equipment used by the subscriber to access the online content services concerned; (d) an internet or telephone contract or any similar type of contract linking the subscriber to a Member State; (e) the fact that the subscriber pays a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State, such as public service broadcasting; (f) proof of payment of local taxes, if this information is publicly available; (g) a declaration by the subscriber as to his or her Member State of residence; (h) registration on local electoral rolls, if such rolls are publicly available; (i) the payment of local/poll taxes, if information in that regard is publicly available or (j) any other verification criterion having been previously agreed upon between the online content service provider and the rightholders. 3. The provider of an online content service shall not track the location of the subscriber by means of Internet Protocol (IP) sampling or other means of geolocation in order to comply with the obligation set out in paragraph 1. 4. The provider of an online content service shall choose which of the means of verification referred to in paragraph 2 it wishes to use. Upon completion of the verification, the provider shall not request or require additional verification of a subscriber who is a party to a contract for the provision of online content services. Additional verification shall not be required upon the conclusion of a new or renewed contract with the same subscriber if all essential information remains unchanged. 5. Data provided pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be held by the provider until the verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence has been completed. They shall be used solely for the purpose of verifying the subscriber's Member State of residence. No information provided in this regard shall be communicated, transferred, shared, licensed or otherwise transmitted to rightholders or other third parties.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Verification of the Member State of residence The provider of an online content service provided in return for payment shall use effective methods to verify the Member State of residence of its subscribers. Such verification methods must be reasonable and proportionate. The provider of an online content service shall be authorised to ask its subscribers to provide the information needed to verify their Member States of residence. To comply with the obligation set out in the first paragraph, online content service providers may make use of the following verification methods: (a) a valid document confirming the subscriber’s Member State of residence; (b) the billing address or postal address of the subscriber; (c) bank details such as the subscriber’s bank account or credit or debit card; (d) the place of installation of a set- top box or similar device used to supply services to the subscriber; (e) the fact that the subscriber is a party to a contract for the supply of internet access or the supply of a telephone service in a Member State; (f) the fact that the subscriber pays a licence fee for other services provided in a Member State, such as public service broadcasting; (g) regular checking of IP addresses to identify the Member State where the subscriber accesses the online content and uses it, or the use of other means of geolocation to identify that Member State. To comply with the obligation set out in the first paragraph, online content service providers may make use of a combination of these verification methods.
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Cross-border portability of online content services provided free of charge 1. A provider of online content services provided free of charge may opt to permit its users who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence to access and use the online content service subject to compliance with the obligation to verify the Member State of residence of users in accordance with Article 3b. 2. If a provider of online content services provided free of charge opts to provide the service in accordance with paragraph 1, it shall inform its users and the rights holders before actually providing the service. 3. If a provider of online content services provided free of charge opts to provide the online content service in accordance with paragraph 1, this Regulation shall apply to it.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Option to enable cross-border portability of online content services provided without payment of money 1. The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence to access and use its online content services in accordance with this Regulation. 2. If a provider of an online content service provided without payment of money opts to provide that service in accordance with paragraph 1, it shall inform its users and the rightholders before actually providing that service. The information shall be provided by means which are adequate and proportionate. 3. If a provider of an online content service provided without payment of money opts to provide that service in accordance with paragraph 1, this Regulation shall apply to it.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Option to enable cross-border portability of online content services provided without payment of money 1. The provider of an online content service provided without payment of money may choose to enable its subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence to access and use its online content services in accordance with this Regulation. 2. If a provider of an online content service provided without payment of money opts to provide that service in accordance with paragraph 1, it shall inform its users and the rightholders before actually providing that service. The information shall be provided by means which are adequate and proportionate. 3. If a provider of an online content service provided without payment of money opts to provide that service in accordance with paragraph 1, this Regulation shall apply to it.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 c (new) Article 3c Verification of the temporary nature of presence in a Member State other than the Member State of residence 1. An online content service provider may make random checks, throughout the contract, on a subscriber’s IP address, for the sole purpose of identifying frequency of access to this service and use of it outside the subscriber’s Member State of residence. 2. The information collected under this Article may not be processed or stored in such a way as to establish the precise location of the subscriber. 3. Where the results of the checks referred to in paragraph 1 would seem to cast doubt upon the temporary nature of the subscriber’s presence in another Member State, the online content service provider may ask him again for any item of information required to verify his Member State of residence in accordance with Article 3b(3) and (4). (4) The rights holders or those holding any other rights in the content of an online content service shall be informed of the verification process used by the service provider to verify the temporary nature of a subscriber’s presence in a Member State other than his Member State of residence.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 The provision of an online content service to, as well as the access to and the use of this service by, a subscriber present in a Member State other than his/her Member State of residence, in accordance with Article 3(1), shall be deemed to occur solely in the Member State of residence including for the purposes of Directive 96/9/EC, Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive 2006/115/EC, Directive 2009/24 and Directive 2010/13/EU.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) The first paragraph is without prejudice to the rights of a provider in the Member State where a subscriber is physically present. Nor shall it prevent the provider, if it so wishes, from granting access to content available in a Member State to a subscriber who is temporarily present in that Member State.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Clauses in contracts between a service provider and a subscriber designed to prohibit or limit the cross-border portability of online content services shall be unenforceable under this Regulation.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1b (new) 1b. The application of this Regulation cannot be circumvented by virtue of the choice of the law of a non-Member State of the Union as the law applicable to contracts signed between service providers and rightholders or to contracts between service providers and subscribers.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. This Regulation shall apply irrespective of the law applicable to contracts concluded between providers of online content services and holders of copyright and related rights or those holding any other rights relevant for access to, and the use of, content in online content services or to contracts between such providers and their subscribers.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation including, in particular, for purposes of verification under Article
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Regulation including, in particular, for purposes of verification of the Member State of residence under Article
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The processing of personal data
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 This Regulation shall apply also to contracts concluded and rights acquired before the date of its application if they are relevant for the provision, the access to and the use of an online content service in accordance with Articles 3 and 3a after that date.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall assess the application of this Regulation and submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the application of this Regulation. The report shall include, inter alia, an assessment of the effectiveness of the verification means of the Member State of residence, including newly developed industry standards and practices. The Commission's report shall be accompanied, if appropriate and necessary, by legislative or non-legislative proposal(s).
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Implementation and reporting 1. Member States shall create or designate a body to monitor the proper implementation of this Regulation on its territory and shall inform the Commission of the existence of the body. 2. The body created or designated in accordance with paragraph 1 shall receive and examine complaints regarding abuse or insufficient measures taken by online content service providers or rights holders in the Member State in application of this Regulation, in particular for the application of Article 3b. The body shall also issue opinions on complaints. 3. The Commission shall produce guidelines, where necessary, on the basis of the complaints that were reported to the bodies created or designated in accordance with paragraph 1.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Principle of technology neutrality Subscribers shall have the freedom to choose the type of device or technology from among those available on the market in order to access online content.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 b (new) Article 7b Evaluation The Commission shall produce an evaluation report three years after the date of application of this Regulation to assess its implementation, particularly as regards the notion of temporary presence and the mechanisms concerning the determination and verification of the Member State of residence. The Commission shall accompany this evaluation report with legislative or non- legislative proposals to improve the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 (2) It shall apply from [date:
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 42 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 2 — having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 in conjunction with Article 169 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8- 0392/2015),
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 - having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 in conjunction with Article 169 thereof,
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Seamless access to online content services by consumers throughout the Union is important for the smooth functioning of the internal market. Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services cross
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the sin
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Since the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers relying, inter alia, on the free movement of services and persons, it is necessary to provide that consumers can use online content services which offer access to content such as music, games, films or sporting events not only in their Member State of residence but also when they are temporarily present in other Member States of the Union. Therefore, barriers that hamper access and use of such online content services cross border
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as laptops, tablets and smartphones
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers' location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services, content which they purchase or rent online in their country of residence and to which they should continue to have access when travelling in the EU for personal or business purposes. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their home country.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have legally acquired the right to use in their
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis as well as from the fact that online service providers may choose to serve specific markets only. This regulation, which complements Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 1a, Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 1b and Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council 1c, should contribute to alleviating the difficulties of adjusting to portability in all sectors, respecting and guaranteeing adequate protection of copyright and related rights under Union law. ________________ 1aDirective 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36) (Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 13 Volume 058 p. 50). 1bDirective 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1) Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 13 Volume 029 p. 257). 1cDirective 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1.).
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) There are a number of barriers which hinder the provision of these services to consumers temporarily present in another Member State. Certain online services include content such as music, games or films which are protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. In particular, the obstacles to cross- border portability of online content services stem from the fact that the rights for the transmission of content protected by copyright and/or related rights such as audiovisual works are often licensed on a territorial basis as well as from the fact that online service providers may arbitrarily choose to serve specific markets only, thus depriving consumers of information and entertainment services.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The same applies to other content such as sporting events which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law but which may be protected by copyright, related rights or by virtue of other specific legislation under national law and which is often also licensed by organisers of such events or offered by online service providers on a territorial basis. Transmissions of such content by broadcasting organisations would be protected by related rights which have been harmonised at Union level. In addition, transmissions of such content often include copyright-protected elements such as music, opening or closing video sequences or graphics. In addition, certain aspects of such transmissions relating to events of major importance for society or events of high interest to the public for the purpose of short news reports, have been harmonised by Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council22. Finally, audiovisual media services within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU include services which provide access to content such as sporting events, news or current events.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The same applies to other content such as sporting events, political debates, news or current events which is not always protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law but which may be protected by copyright, related rights or by virtue of other specific legislation under national law and which is often also licensed by organisers of such events or offered by online service providers on a territorial basis. Transmissions of such content by broadcasting organisations would be protected by related rights which have been harmonised at Union level. In addition, transmissions of such content often include copyright-protected elements such as music, opening or closing video sequences or graphics. In addition, certain aspects of such transmissions relating to events of major importance for society or events of high interest to the public for the purpose of short news reports, have been harmonised by Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council22. Finally, audiovisual media services within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU include services which provide access to content such as sporting events, news or current events.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected by copyright and/or related rights without substantially lessening the value of the service provided to consumers. This is especially the case with premium content such as sporting or other events of significant interest to consumers. In order to enable service providers to deliver to consumers full cross-border access to their online content services, it is indispensable that this Regulation also covers such content used by online content services and therefore that it applies to audiovisual media services in the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU as well as to transmissions of broadcasting organisations in their entirety.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The controlled, supervised and proportionate implementation of cross- border portability will provide its beneficiaries with an additional means of accessing online content legally.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The rights in works and other protected subject matter are harmonised, inter alia, in Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 23, Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 24, Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 25 and in Directive 2009/24 of the European Parliament and of the Council 26. Therefore, this Regulation contributes to the functioning of the internal market as an area without borders, where the freedom to provide and to receive online content services shall be ensured, respecting and guaranteeing copyright and related rights under Union law. __________________ 23 Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases OJ L 077, 27.03.1996, p. 20-28.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The acquisition of a licence for the relevant rights is not always possible, notably when rights in content are licensed on an exclusive basis. In order to ensure the territorial exclusivity, online service providers often undertake, in their licence contracts with right holders, including broadcasting organisations or events organisers, to prevent their subscribers from accessing and using their service outside the territory for which the service provider holds the licence. These contractual restrictions imposed on service providers require providers to take measures such as disallowing access to their services from IP addresses located outside the territory concerned.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The acquisition of a licence for the relevant rights is not always possible, notably when rights in content are licensed on an exclusive basis. In order to ensure the territorial exclusivity, online service providers often undertake, in their licence contracts with right holders, including broadcasting organisations or events organisers, to prevent their subscribers from accessing and using their service outside the territory for which the service provider holds the licence. These contractual restrictions imposed on service providers require providers to take measures such as disallowing access to their services from IP addresses located outside the territory concerned. Therefore, while the upholding of the principle of territoriality due to its importance to the growth and financing of the audiovisual sector is essential, one of the obstacles to the cross-border portability of online content services is
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The acquisition of a licence for the relevant rights is not always possible, notably when rights in content are licensed on an exclusive basis. In order to ensure the territorial exclusivity, online service providers often undertake, in their licence contracts with right holders, including broadcasting organisations or events organisers, to prevent their subscribers from accessing and using their service outside the territory for which the service provider holds the licence.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Since the contracts concluded between online service providers and subscribers reflect in their provisions the territorial restriction clauses included in contracts concluded between those service providers and right holders, this Regulation should ensure cross-border access to online content services for any subscriber temporarily resident in a Member State other than his or her Member State of residence. It is in this context that this Regulation can achieve the objective of ensuring cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market by establishing the localisation of the service for purposes of portability, through the obligation to offer cross-border portability and by rendering unenforceable any contractual provisions contrary to this obligation.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In addition, the Court held in Joined cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, Football Association Premier League and Others, EU:C:2011:631, that certain contractual restrictions
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In addition,
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt and harmonise the legal framework, in particular as regards copyright and related rights, in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross- border portability can be ensured for lawfully acquired online content.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross- border portability of online content services in the Union and that the cross-
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Since the objective of this Regulation is to increase consumers' access to the content they already have legal access to, regardless of their temporary presence in another Member state, no provision in this Regulation should limit the access to content already enjoyed by consumers today. Particularly, the legal fiction set out in Article 4 only applies to online content services that a service provider is lawfully providing online in the Member State of residence. It does not limit the possibility for a service provider to additionally provide subscribers access to the local repertoire offered by that service provider in the Member state of temporary presence. If a service provider operates in both the Member state of a subscriber's habitual residence and the Member state of temporary presence, the subscriber should have the option to access both repertoires.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The concept of cross-border portability should be distinguished from the concept of cross-border access to online content, which does not fall within the scope of this Regulation. This Regulation does not aim to change and should not affect the existing system of territorial licensing, which is key in the financing, production and distribution of European audiovisual works.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content. A registration to receive content alerts, a simple registration based on general personal information such as the user's email-address or name, or a mere acceptance of HTML cookies should not be regarded as a contract for the provision of online content service for the purposes of this Regulation.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) This Regulation should, therefore, apply to online content services that a service provider, after having obtained the relevant rights from right holders in a given territory, provides to its subscribers on the basis of a contract, by any means including streaming, downloading or any other technique which allows use of that content. A registration to receive content alerts, the transfer of data, or a mere acceptance of HTML cookies should not be regarded as a contract for the provision of online content service for the purposes of this Regulation.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in their Member State
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation should apply only to online content services which subscribers can effectively access and use in the Member State in which they habitually reside without being limited to a specific location, as it is
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services, such as digital subscriptions, which are provided against payment of money. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider offering a package combining a telecommunications service and an online content service operated by another provider. The payment of a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting licence fee should not be regarded as a payment of money to receive access to those online content services on a cross-border portable basis.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider offering a package combining a telecommunications service and an online content service operated by another provider. Neither contributions towards licence fees, nor the transfer or exchange of data shall be deemed as payment by the consumer.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) This Regulation should apply to online content services which are provided against payment of money. Providers of such services are in a position to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money, including the payment of a mandatory fee such as a broadcasting fee, whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider offering a package combining a telecommunications service and an online content service operated by another provider.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Since this Regulation is mandatory for all online services provided against payment of money, verification of habitual residence based on the means of payment should in any case be considered sufficient, in order to provide service providers with an easily implementable, effective, non-intrusive and proportionate means of verification.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money a
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence,
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Online content services which are provided without payment of money are also included in the scope of this Regulation to the extent that providers verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers. Online content services which are provided without the payment of money and whose providers do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers should be outside the scope of this Regulation as their inclusion would involve a major change to the way these services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs. As concerns verification of the subscriber's Member State of residence, information such as a payment of a licence fee for other services provided in the Member State of residence, the existence of a contract for internet
source: 589.348
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=28000&j=0&l=en
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
events/9/docs |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2016)577970New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2016)577970 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0039)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0039)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0719)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0719)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.465New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-585465_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.729&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-578729_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE583.955&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-583955_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE583.879&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-583879_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.348New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-589348_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=28000&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/9/docs |
|
events/11 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/10/body |
EC
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0378&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0378_EN.html |
events/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0224New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0224_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/8/05563New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R1128New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R1128 |
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/15 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/11 |
|
activities/12 |
|
activities/13 |
|
activities/14 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/10/docs/0/text |
|
activities/10/docs |
|
activities/10/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/9/docs |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/10/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/9/date |
Old
2017-05-16T00:00:00New
2017-05-17T00:00:00 |
activities/9/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/10 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Enterprise and IndustryNew
Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/internal-market-industry-entrepreneurship-and-smes_en |
other/1/dg/title |
Old
Enterprise and IndustryNew
Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs |
other/1/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/internal-market-industry-entrepreneurship-and-smes_en |
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Old
Economic and Social CommitteeNew
European Economic and Social Committee |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0627:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0627:EN
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/7 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2017-04-04T00:00:00New
2015-12-09T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
53b2dc24b819f205b00000a1New
53b2de13b819f205b00000e2 |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1/name |
Old
KÖSTER DietmarNew
NEGRESCU Victor |
activities/5/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
53b2dc24b819f205b00000a1New
53b2de13b819f205b00000e2 |
activities/5/committees/3/shadows/1/name |
Old
KÖSTER DietmarNew
NEGRESCU Victor |
activities/6/committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
53b2dc24b819f205b00000a1New
53b2de13b819f205b00000e2 |
activities/6/committees/3/shadows/1/name |
Old
KÖSTER DietmarNew
NEGRESCU Victor |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
53b2dc24b819f205b00000a1New
53b2de13b819f205b00000e2 |
committees/3/shadows/1/name |
Old
KÖSTER DietmarNew
NEGRESCU Victor |
links/Research document |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2017-01-17T00:00:00New
2017-04-04T00:00:00 |
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/6 |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
committees/3/shadows/6 |
|
procedure/subject/3 |
3.50.15 Intellectual property, copyright
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
Old
2016-03-15T00:00:00New
2016-03-14T00:00:00 |
committees/3/date |
Old
2016-03-15T00:00:00New
2016-03-14T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/committee_full |
Old
Culture and EducationNew
Culture and Education (Associated committee) |
activities/1/committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionNew
Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) |
activities/1/committees/1/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/1/committees/3/committee_full |
Old
Legal AffairsNew
Legal Affairs (Associated committee) |
activities/1/committees/3/responsible |
Old
New
True |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/0/committee_full |
Old
Culture and EducationNew
Culture and Education (Associated committee) |
committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionNew
Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) |
committees/1/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/3/committee_full |
Old
Legal AffairsNew
Legal Affairs (Associated committee) |
committees/3/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/8/05560New
JURI/8/05563 |
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2016-03-15T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/date |
2016-03-15T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2016-03-01T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2016-03-01T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2016-02-16T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/date |
2016-02-16T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2016-02-02T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/date |
2016-02-02T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
IMCO/8/05560
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|