BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2015/2003(INI) EU-China relations

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET BELDER Bas (icon: ECR ECR) LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio (icon: PPE PPE), LEINEN Jo (icon: S&D S&D), VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2015/12/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2015/12/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 554 votes to 50, with 99 abstentions, a resolution on EU-China relations.

Parliament noted that 2015 marks the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China. The EU-China Strategic Partnership is of key importance to relations between the EU and China and to finding mutual answers to a range of global concerns.

EU-China Strategic Partnership and Cooperation : Parliament welcomed the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China as a source of inspiration to strengthen the Strategic Partnership, and to speed up the ongoing negotiations for a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement based on trust, transparency and respect for human rights. It stressed the need for EU Member States to speak with one voice to the Chinese Government , particularly in view of Beijing's present reshaping of the global governance architecture. In this respect, Parliament:

looked forward to a close cooperation of the EU with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) but regretted the lack of close coordination at EU level regarding several Member States' membership of the AIIB; stressed the importance of trade and investment policy, as the most obvious area to exert maximum leverage in the strategic relationship with China; took note of the recently developed cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries, also known as the 16+1 group , which includes several EU Member States, but considered that this should not divide the EU or weaken its position vis-à-vis China and should also address human rights issues.

Parliament called on the European External Action Service and the Commission to submit an annual report to Parliament on the development of EU-China relations. The EEAS was asked to ensure that human rights are high on the agenda in relations and dialogues with China.

The resolution went on to underline the importance of the Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIT) between the EU and China currently under negotiation. It called, inter alia, for a fully-fledged sustainable development chapter to be included in the BIT, which provides for binding commitments with respect to ILO core labour standards and key Multilateral Environmental Agreements . Whilst welcoming the fact that over the last decades a considerable number of Chinese citizens have been lifted out of extreme poverty thanks to substantial economic growth, Parliament voiced, nonetheless, its concern that these economic improvements often cause environmental problems and great inequalities.

It also recalled that the EU Ombudsman in her draft recommendation adopted on 26 March 2015 criticised the absence of a human rights impact assessment in relation to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism in the negotiations for a trade and investment agreement with Vietnam. Parliament noted that this sets an important precedent for the negotiations for the EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement.

Internal situation : Parliament observed that China’s human rights record remained a matter of serious concern. It discussed the adoption of several pieces of repressive legislation, including the draft Foreign NGO Management Law, and the new draft law on cybersecurity. It called on the European Council, the EEAS and the Commission to continue to complain forcefully to the Chinese authorities against these highly controversial measures.

Members expressed concern at the recent political and civil unrest in Hong Kong, and called on China to abide by its obligations to the people of Hong Kong to preserve their rights and freedoms. They strongly supported ‘ One country, two systems ’ as a basis for good relations between the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macao and mainland China.

External situation : Parliament noted that since its launch President Xi’s ‘Chinese Dream’ of national rejuvenation foresees a stronger and more proactive role for China in the world. It encouraged the VP/HR to explore the possibilities of developing a common approach to China with the US wherever this would contribute to advancing EU interests.

It stressed:

that China’s persistent rise as a global power requires a continuous and rapid reconsideration of Europe’s strategic priorities in its relations with China, as a matter of urgency; the need for a world power like China to contribute, in a globalised and interdependent context and in a more active and constructive manner, to confronting global challenges and regional conflicts and to attaining a multilateral world order that respects international law, universal values and peace.

It considered that China should increasingly take its place among the world’s leading countries, acting according to the rules set for all.

Parliament also noted the priority given by President Xi’s presidency to the relationship with the US, given his proposal for a ‘new type of major power relationship’ between China, the US and other regional actors. It favoured a more constructive approach to a new world order which China should help construe and integrate, one founded on the universal values of human rights, democracy and human security. It called on the EU to be more active in Asia, and to cooperate with China, the US and other regional actors for more stability in the region.

China Sea : Parliament stated that it remains alarmed at the escalating tension between parties in the South China Sea and called, therefore, on all parties involved to avoid unilateral provocative actions in the South China Sea . It stressed the importance of peaceful settlement of disputes, based on international law and with the help of impartial international mediation such as the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

It considered it regrettable that China refuses to acknowledge the jurisdiction of both UNCLOS and the Court of Arbitration. It considered that a way forward for a possible peaceful resolution of the tension in the areas of the South and East China Seas is the negotiation and joint implementation of codes of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question , including the establishment of safe trade routes and quotas for fishing or attribution of areas for resource exploration.

Parliament also welcomed the agreement reached recently between China and ASEAN to speed up consultations on a Code of Conduct for the disputes in the South China Sea and it took note of Taiwan’s ‘South China Sea Peace Initiative’ aimed at reaching a consensus on a code of conduct and the establishment of a mechanism allowing all sides to cooperate in the joint exploitation of natural and marine resources in the region; supports all actions enabling the South China Sea to become a ‘Sea of Peace and Cooperation’.

Members invited the VP/HR to identify the risks to peace and security in the region as well as globally should armed conflict arise in the East and South China Seas, what risks this would entail for the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, and what risks exist there to specific European interests. The Chinese Government is urged to use all its levers of influence to ensure stability in the Korean peninsula and to induce North Korea to return to credible denuclearisation talks and take concrete steps to denuclearise .

The resolution recalled that China remains North Korea’s most important ally, and therefore Parliament encouraged the Chinese government, together with the international community, to play a constructive role in urgently addressing the dire human rights situation in North Korea, including dealing with the thousands of North Korea refugees who cross the border into China fleeing appalling conditions at home.

Further salient international issues : Parliament urged the Chinese government to exert influence on Pakistan to persuade that country to refrain from fuelling instability in the region. It regretted the fact that China, in partnership with Russia, has continuously blocked UN action on Syria, where a deadly war is being waged by Bashar al Assad on the Syrian people, for over four years now. It underlined the importance of mutual trust and cooperation between China and the EU and the other key international actors to tackle global security issues . Members hope that China will offer its support to the EU- and US-led initiatives aiming at ending the breaches of international law causing the conflict in Eastern Ukraine and at restoring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine after Russia’s aggression.

Human rights situation : Parliament noted the recent worsening of the situation of human rights in China started in 2013 and has intensified an already existing crackdown over the population. It noted its concern that in the official Chinese view, the universality of human rights is questioned on grounds of cultural differences, and that this has led to lack of understanding and distrust in EU-China relations. It called, therefore, on the Chinese leadership to reconsider and to respect the universality of human rights and on the EU institutions to work together with the Chinese authorities in their dialogues in order to advance respect for universality.

Parliament went on to state its concern that China is currently the world's largest executioner and continues to impose the death penalty in secret on thousands of people annually. It emphasised once again that abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity and the progressive development of human rights.

On the issue of corruption, Parliament noted that certain commitments have been put forward by President Xi to ‘comprehensively advance ruling the country according to the law’, along with combating corruption.

It is also deeply concerned that the Chinese government is continuing its hardline policies against the Tibetan people , especially by rejecting the Dalai Lama's ‘Middle Way Approach’ which seeks neither independence nor separation but a genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese Constitution. Members called for the Chinese government to re-enter into a dialogue with Tibetan representatives.

Parliament urged European companies investing in China to respect international labour standards and to make commitments to go beyond Chinese labour rights, if these do not meet internationally agreed standards.

Cross-strait relations : Parliament advocated negotiating a bilateral investment agreement between the EU and Taiwan , given that Taiwan was, at regional level, the best gateway to China for EU businesses and that numerous states – including China – have concluded such (de facto) agreements with Taiwan.

Whilst commending the acceptance by the Chinese government of Taiwan's participation in some UN organisations (WHO, ICAO), Parliament expressed its concern at the Chinese government's reaffirmation of the 2005 Anti-Secession Law that allows for the use of military means in the case of a declaration of independence by Taiwan.

It deplored the fact that there are still 1 500 long-range missiles aimed at Taiwan from southern China and took the view that a gradual demilitarisation of the region would further facilitate the rapprochement of the parties.

Parliament emphasised that all cross-Strait disputes should be settled by peaceful means on the basis of international law and stressed that the meeting on 23 May 2015 on Kinmen Island between top officials from the two sides of the Taiwan Strait was an encouraging step.

Documents
T8-0458/2015
2015/12/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/12/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Documents
Debate in Parliament
2015/12/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Bastiaan Belder (ECR, NL) on EU-China relations. It noted that 2015 marks the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China. The EU-China Strategic Partnership is of key importance to relations between the EU and China and to finding mutual answers to a range of global concerns.

EU-China Strategic Partnership and Cooperation : the report welcomed the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China as a source of inspiration to strengthen the Strategic Partnership, and to speed up the ongoing negotiations for a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement based on trust, transparency and respect for human rights. It stressed the need for EU Member States to speak with one voice to the Chinese Government , particularly in view of Beijing's present reshaping of the global governance architecture. In this respect, Members:

looked forward to a close cooperation of the EU with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) but regretted the lack of close coordination at EU level regarding several Member States' membership of the AIIB; stressed the importance of trade and investment policy, as the most obvious area to exert maximum leverage in the strategic relationship with China; took note of the recently developed cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries, also known as the 16+1 group , which includes several EU Member States, but considered that this should not divide the EU or weaken its position vis-à-vis China and should also address human rights issues.

Members called on the European External Action Service and the Commission to submit an annual report to Parliament on the development of EU-China relations. The EEAS was asked to ensure that human rights are high on the agenda in relations and dialogues with China.

The report went on to underline the importance of the Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIT) between the EU and China currently under negotiation. It called, inter alia, for a fully-fledged sustainable development chapter to be included in the BIT, which provides for binding commitments with respect to ILO core labour standards and key Multilateral Environmental Agreements . Whilst welcoming the fact that over the last decades a considerable number of Chinese citizens have been lifted out of extreme poverty thanks to substantial economic growth, Members voiced, nonetheless, their concern that these economic improvements often cause environmental problems and great inequalities.

They also recalled that the EU Ombudsman in her draft recommendation adopted on 26 March 2015 criticised the absence of a human rights impact assessment in relation to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism in the negotiations for a trade and investment agreement with Vietnam. Members noted that this sets an important precedent for the negotiations for the EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement.

Internal situation : the committee observed that China’s human rights record remained a matter of serious concern. It discussed the adoption of several pieces of repressive legislation, including the draft Foreign NGO Management Law, and the new draft law on cybersecurity. Members called on the European Council, the EEAS and the Commission to continue to complain forcefully to the Chinese authorities against these highly controversial measures.

They expressed concern at the recent political and civil unrest in Hong Kong, and called on China to abide by its obligations to the people of Hong Kong to preserve their rights and freedoms.

External situation : the committee noted that since its launch President Xi’s ‘Chinese Dream’ of national rejuvenation foresees a more proactive role for China in the world. It encouraged the VP/HR to explore the possibilities of developing a common approach to China with the US wherever this would contribute to advancing EU interests. It noted the priority given by President Xi's presidency to the relationship with the US, given his proposal for a 'new type of major power relationship' between China, the US and other regional actors. Members favoured a more constructive approach to a new world orde r which China should help construe and integrate, one founded on the universal values of human rights, democracy and human security. Members called on the EU to be more active in Asia , and to cooperate with China, the US and other regional actors for more stability in the region.

Members went on to discuss the expansion of the Chinese navy , calling for a balanced attitude, to avoid worries on the part of China's neighbours and more tension in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and to guarantee Europe's crucial interest in freedom of navigation on the seas. They called on the VP/HR to identify the risks to peace and security in the region as well as globally should armed conflict arise in the East and South China Seas , in line with the priorities set forth in the European Maritime Security Strategy, what risks this would entail for the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, and what risks exist there to specific European interests.

The Chinese Government was urged to use all its levers of influence to ensure stability in the Korean peninsula and to induce North Korea to return to credible denuclearisation talks.

Human rights situation : Members noted the recent worsening of the situation of human rights in China started in 2013 and has intensified an already existing crackdown over the population. They were concerned that in the official Chinese view, the universality of human rights is questioned on grounds of cultural differences, and that this has led to lack of understanding and distrust in EU-China relations. They called, therefore, on the Chinese leadership to reconsider and to respect the universality of human rights and on the EU institutions to work together with the Chinese authorities in their dialogues in order to advance respect for universality.

Members want on to state their concern that China is currently the world's largest executioner and continues to impose the death penalty in secret on thousands of people annually. They were also deeply concerned that the Chinese government is continuing its hardline policies against the Tibetan people , especially by rejecting the Dalai Lama's ‘Middle Way Approach’ which seeks neither independence nor separation but a genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese Constitution. They called for the Chinese government to re-enter into a dialogue with Tibetan representatives.

Cross-strait relations : Members advocated negotiating a bilateral investment agreement between the EU and Taiwan , given that Taiwan was, at regional level, the best gateway to China for EU businesses and that numerous states – including China – have concluded such (de facto) agreements with Taiwan.

Whilst commending the acceptance by the Chinese government of Taiwan's participation in some UN organisations (WHO, ICAO), the committee expressed its concern at the Chinese government's reaffirmation of the 2005 Anti-Secession Law that allows for the use of military means in the case of a declaration of independence by Taiwan. It felt that a gradual demilitarisation of the region would further facilitate the rapprochement of the parties, emphasising that all cross-strait disputes should be settled by peaceful means on the basis of international law.

Documents
A8-0350/2015
2015/11/26
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/09/23
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE567.662
2015/09/22
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE565.199
2015/06/17
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE560.676
2015/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/10/07
   EP - BELDER Bas (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0350/2015 - Bas Belder - Résolution #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 554, 0: 99, -: 50
DE GB IT PL ES RO FR BE BG SE CZ HU PT NL AT SK HR FI LT DK SI LV EE MT LU EL IE CY
Total
86
70
68
48
46
30
68
21
17
19
19
20
20
25
16
13
11
12
11
12
7
8
6
6
5
22
10
6
icon: PPE PPE
203

Germany PPE

32

Italy PPE

14

Poland PPE

22

Spain PPE

14

Romania PPE

11

France PPE

18

Belgium PPE

4

Bulgaria PPE

7

Sweden PPE

4

Czechia PPE

6

Hungary PPE

11

Portugal PPE

7

Netherlands PPE

4

Austria PPE

5

Slovakia PPE

6

Croatia PPE

5

Finland PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

Bendt BENDTSEN
1

Slovenia PPE

4

Latvia PPE

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

Tunne KELAM
1

Malta PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Greece PPE

6

Ireland PPE

4

Cyprus PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
178

Germany S&D

24

United Kingdom S&D

21

Italy S&D

28

Poland S&D

4

Spain S&D

12

Romania S&D

14

France S&D

11

Belgium S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

4

Sweden S&D

6

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

Miroslav POCHE
4

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

István UJHELYI
4

Portugal S&D

8

Netherlands S&D

3

Austria S&D

4

Slovakia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Denmark S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

Tanja FAJON
1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

Andrejs MAMIKINS
1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

Marju LAURISTIN
1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

Mady DELVAUX
1

Greece S&D

4

Ireland S&D

For (1)

Nessa CHILDERS
1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Germany ALDE

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

7

Romania ALDE

3

France ALDE

7

Belgium ALDE

6

Bulgaria ALDE

4

Sweden ALDE

3

Czechia ALDE

4

Portugal ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

7

Austria ALDE

For (1)

Angelika MLINAR
1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

4

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Ivo VAJGL
1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

Marian HARKIN
1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

Marcus PRETZELL
6

United Kingdom ECR

19

Italy ECR

2

Poland ECR

18

Romania ECR

For (1)

Monica MACOVEI
1

Belgium ECR

4

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

Branislav ŠKRIPEK
3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

Ruža TOMAŠIĆ
1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

4

Latvia ECR

For (1)

Roberts ZĪLE
1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

Notis MARIAS
1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Germany Verts/ALE

12

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Spain Verts/ALE

4

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

Pascal DURAND
6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Davor ŠKRLEC
1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

Heidi HAUTALA
1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

Bronis ROPĖ
1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

Margrete AUKEN
1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Igor ŠOLTES
1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

Tatjana ŽDANOKA
1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Indrek TARAND
1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

Claude TURMES
1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

United Kingdom EFDD

20

Italy EFDD

For (1)

Giulia MOI
16

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

Petr MACH
1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

Rolandas PAKSAS
1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

Udo VOIGT
2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Diane DODDS
1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE
1

France NI

Against (1)

Bruno GOLLNISCH
2

Hungary NI

3

Greece NI

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Germany GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Fabio DE MASI
6

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Martina ANDERSON
1

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Eleonora FORENZA
3

Spain GUE/NGL

9

France GUE/NGL

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

Malin BJÖRK
1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

Merja KYLLÖNEN
1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

Rina Ronja KARI
1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Nikolaos CHOUNTIS
6

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

Janice ATKINSON
1

Italy ENF

5

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

France ENF

19

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

Gerolf ANNEMANS
1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
AmendmentsDossier
484 2015/2003(INI)
2015/09/18 AFET 263 amendments...
source: 567.662
2015/09/22 AFET 221 amendments...
source: 565.199

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2021-12-18Show (14) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BELDER Bas date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BELDER Bas date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.676
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-560676_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.199
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-565199_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.662
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-567662_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-12-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0350_EN.html title: A8-0350/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-12-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0350_EN.html title: A8-0350/2015
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-12-15-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0458_EN.html title: T8-0458/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0458_EN.html title: T8-0458/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
2020-01-19Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BELDER Bas date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-10-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BELDER Bas group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0350&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0350_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0458
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0458_EN.html
2019-07-06Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: LEINEN Jo group: ALDE name: VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis group: GUE/NGL name: MÉLENCHON Jean-Luc group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: BELDER Bas
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: LEINEN Jo group: ALDE name: VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis group: GUE/NGL name: MÉLENCHON Jean-Luc group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: BELDER Bas
  • date: 2015-12-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0350&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0350/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0458 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0458/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-10-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BELDER Bas group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2014-10-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ECR name: BELDER Bas
docs
  • date: 2015-06-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.676 title: PE560.676 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.199 title: PE565.199 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.662 title: PE567.662 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-12-02T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0350&language=EN title: A8-0350/2015 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Bastiaan Belder (ECR, NL) on EU-China relations. It noted that 2015 marks the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China. The EU-China Strategic Partnership is of key importance to relations between the EU and China and to finding mutual answers to a range of global concerns. EU-China Strategic Partnership and Cooperation : the report welcomed the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China as a source of inspiration to strengthen the Strategic Partnership, and to speed up the ongoing negotiations for a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement based on trust, transparency and respect for human rights. It stressed the need for EU Member States to speak with one voice to the Chinese Government , particularly in view of Beijing's present reshaping of the global governance architecture. In this respect, Members: looked forward to a close cooperation of the EU with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) but regretted the lack of close coordination at EU level regarding several Member States' membership of the AIIB; stressed the importance of trade and investment policy, as the most obvious area to exert maximum leverage in the strategic relationship with China; took note of the recently developed cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries, also known as the 16+1 group , which includes several EU Member States, but considered that this should not divide the EU or weaken its position vis-à-vis China and should also address human rights issues. Members called on the European External Action Service and the Commission to submit an annual report to Parliament on the development of EU-China relations. The EEAS was asked to ensure that human rights are high on the agenda in relations and dialogues with China. The report went on to underline the importance of the Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIT) between the EU and China currently under negotiation. It called, inter alia, for a fully-fledged sustainable development chapter to be included in the BIT, which provides for binding commitments with respect to ILO core labour standards and key Multilateral Environmental Agreements . Whilst welcoming the fact that over the last decades a considerable number of Chinese citizens have been lifted out of extreme poverty thanks to substantial economic growth, Members voiced, nonetheless, their concern that these economic improvements often cause environmental problems and great inequalities. They also recalled that the EU Ombudsman in her draft recommendation adopted on 26 March 2015 criticised the absence of a human rights impact assessment in relation to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism in the negotiations for a trade and investment agreement with Vietnam. Members noted that this sets an important precedent for the negotiations for the EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement. Internal situation : the committee observed that China’s human rights record remained a matter of serious concern. It discussed the adoption of several pieces of repressive legislation, including the draft Foreign NGO Management Law, and the new draft law on cybersecurity. Members called on the European Council, the EEAS and the Commission to continue to complain forcefully to the Chinese authorities against these highly controversial measures. They expressed concern at the recent political and civil unrest in Hong Kong, and called on China to abide by its obligations to the people of Hong Kong to preserve their rights and freedoms. External situation : the committee noted that since its launch President Xi’s ‘Chinese Dream’ of national rejuvenation foresees a more proactive role for China in the world. It encouraged the VP/HR to explore the possibilities of developing a common approach to China with the US wherever this would contribute to advancing EU interests. It noted the priority given by President Xi's presidency to the relationship with the US, given his proposal for a 'new type of major power relationship' between China, the US and other regional actors. Members favoured a more constructive approach to a new world orde r which China should help construe and integrate, one founded on the universal values of human rights, democracy and human security. Members called on the EU to be more active in Asia , and to cooperate with China, the US and other regional actors for more stability in the region. Members went on to discuss the expansion of the Chinese navy , calling for a balanced attitude, to avoid worries on the part of China's neighbours and more tension in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and to guarantee Europe's crucial interest in freedom of navigation on the seas. They called on the VP/HR to identify the risks to peace and security in the region as well as globally should armed conflict arise in the East and South China Seas , in line with the priorities set forth in the European Maritime Security Strategy, what risks this would entail for the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, and what risks exist there to specific European interests. The Chinese Government was urged to use all its levers of influence to ensure stability in the Korean peninsula and to induce North Korea to return to credible denuclearisation talks. Human rights situation : Members noted the recent worsening of the situation of human rights in China started in 2013 and has intensified an already existing crackdown over the population. They were concerned that in the official Chinese view, the universality of human rights is questioned on grounds of cultural differences, and that this has led to lack of understanding and distrust in EU-China relations. They called, therefore, on the Chinese leadership to reconsider and to respect the universality of human rights and on the EU institutions to work together with the Chinese authorities in their dialogues in order to advance respect for universality. Members want on to state their concern that China is currently the world's largest executioner and continues to impose the death penalty in secret on thousands of people annually. They were also deeply concerned that the Chinese government is continuing its hardline policies against the Tibetan people , especially by rejecting the Dalai Lama's ‘Middle Way Approach’ which seeks neither independence nor separation but a genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese Constitution. They called for the Chinese government to re-enter into a dialogue with Tibetan representatives. Cross-strait relations : Members advocated negotiating a bilateral investment agreement between the EU and Taiwan , given that Taiwan was, at regional level, the best gateway to China for EU businesses and that numerous states – including China – have concluded such (de facto) agreements with Taiwan. Whilst commending the acceptance by the Chinese government of Taiwan's participation in some UN organisations (WHO, ICAO), the committee expressed its concern at the Chinese government's reaffirmation of the 2005 Anti-Secession Law that allows for the use of military means in the case of a declaration of independence by Taiwan. It felt that a gradual demilitarisation of the region would further facilitate the rapprochement of the parties, emphasising that all cross-strait disputes should be settled by peaceful means on the basis of international law.
  • date: 2015-12-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26473&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0458 title: T8-0458/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 554 votes to 50, with 99 abstentions, a resolution on EU-China relations. Parliament noted that 2015 marks the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China. The EU-China Strategic Partnership is of key importance to relations between the EU and China and to finding mutual answers to a range of global concerns. EU-China Strategic Partnership and Cooperation : Parliament welcomed the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China as a source of inspiration to strengthen the Strategic Partnership, and to speed up the ongoing negotiations for a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement based on trust, transparency and respect for human rights. It stressed the need for EU Member States to speak with one voice to the Chinese Government , particularly in view of Beijing's present reshaping of the global governance architecture. In this respect, Parliament: looked forward to a close cooperation of the EU with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) but regretted the lack of close coordination at EU level regarding several Member States' membership of the AIIB; stressed the importance of trade and investment policy, as the most obvious area to exert maximum leverage in the strategic relationship with China; took note of the recently developed cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries, also known as the 16+1 group , which includes several EU Member States, but considered that this should not divide the EU or weaken its position vis-à-vis China and should also address human rights issues. Parliament called on the European External Action Service and the Commission to submit an annual report to Parliament on the development of EU-China relations. The EEAS was asked to ensure that human rights are high on the agenda in relations and dialogues with China. The resolution went on to underline the importance of the Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIT) between the EU and China currently under negotiation. It called, inter alia, for a fully-fledged sustainable development chapter to be included in the BIT, which provides for binding commitments with respect to ILO core labour standards and key Multilateral Environmental Agreements . Whilst welcoming the fact that over the last decades a considerable number of Chinese citizens have been lifted out of extreme poverty thanks to substantial economic growth, Parliament voiced, nonetheless, its concern that these economic improvements often cause environmental problems and great inequalities. It also recalled that the EU Ombudsman in her draft recommendation adopted on 26 March 2015 criticised the absence of a human rights impact assessment in relation to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism in the negotiations for a trade and investment agreement with Vietnam. Parliament noted that this sets an important precedent for the negotiations for the EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement. Internal situation : Parliament observed that China’s human rights record remained a matter of serious concern. It discussed the adoption of several pieces of repressive legislation, including the draft Foreign NGO Management Law, and the new draft law on cybersecurity. It called on the European Council, the EEAS and the Commission to continue to complain forcefully to the Chinese authorities against these highly controversial measures. Members expressed concern at the recent political and civil unrest in Hong Kong, and called on China to abide by its obligations to the people of Hong Kong to preserve their rights and freedoms. They strongly supported ‘ One country, two systems ’ as a basis for good relations between the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macao and mainland China. External situation : Parliament noted that since its launch President Xi’s ‘Chinese Dream’ of national rejuvenation foresees a stronger and more proactive role for China in the world. It encouraged the VP/HR to explore the possibilities of developing a common approach to China with the US wherever this would contribute to advancing EU interests. It stressed: that China’s persistent rise as a global power requires a continuous and rapid reconsideration of Europe’s strategic priorities in its relations with China, as a matter of urgency; the need for a world power like China to contribute, in a globalised and interdependent context and in a more active and constructive manner, to confronting global challenges and regional conflicts and to attaining a multilateral world order that respects international law, universal values and peace. It considered that China should increasingly take its place among the world’s leading countries, acting according to the rules set for all. Parliament also noted the priority given by President Xi’s presidency to the relationship with the US, given his proposal for a ‘new type of major power relationship’ between China, the US and other regional actors. It favoured a more constructive approach to a new world order which China should help construe and integrate, one founded on the universal values of human rights, democracy and human security. It called on the EU to be more active in Asia, and to cooperate with China, the US and other regional actors for more stability in the region. China Sea : Parliament stated that it remains alarmed at the escalating tension between parties in the South China Sea and called, therefore, on all parties involved to avoid unilateral provocative actions in the South China Sea . It stressed the importance of peaceful settlement of disputes, based on international law and with the help of impartial international mediation such as the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It considered it regrettable that China refuses to acknowledge the jurisdiction of both UNCLOS and the Court of Arbitration. It considered that a way forward for a possible peaceful resolution of the tension in the areas of the South and East China Seas is the negotiation and joint implementation of codes of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question , including the establishment of safe trade routes and quotas for fishing or attribution of areas for resource exploration. Parliament also welcomed the agreement reached recently between China and ASEAN to speed up consultations on a Code of Conduct for the disputes in the South China Sea and it took note of Taiwan’s ‘South China Sea Peace Initiative’ aimed at reaching a consensus on a code of conduct and the establishment of a mechanism allowing all sides to cooperate in the joint exploitation of natural and marine resources in the region; supports all actions enabling the South China Sea to become a ‘Sea of Peace and Cooperation’. Members invited the VP/HR to identify the risks to peace and security in the region as well as globally should armed conflict arise in the East and South China Seas, what risks this would entail for the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, and what risks exist there to specific European interests. The Chinese Government is urged to use all its levers of influence to ensure stability in the Korean peninsula and to induce North Korea to return to credible denuclearisation talks and take concrete steps to denuclearise . The resolution recalled that China remains North Korea’s most important ally, and therefore Parliament encouraged the Chinese government, together with the international community, to play a constructive role in urgently addressing the dire human rights situation in North Korea, including dealing with the thousands of North Korea refugees who cross the border into China fleeing appalling conditions at home. Further salient international issues : Parliament urged the Chinese government to exert influence on Pakistan to persuade that country to refrain from fuelling instability in the region. It regretted the fact that China, in partnership with Russia, has continuously blocked UN action on Syria, where a deadly war is being waged by Bashar al Assad on the Syrian people, for over four years now. It underlined the importance of mutual trust and cooperation between China and the EU and the other key international actors to tackle global security issues . Members hope that China will offer its support to the EU- and US-led initiatives aiming at ending the breaches of international law causing the conflict in Eastern Ukraine and at restoring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine after Russia’s aggression. Human rights situation : Parliament noted the recent worsening of the situation of human rights in China started in 2013 and has intensified an already existing crackdown over the population. It noted its concern that in the official Chinese view, the universality of human rights is questioned on grounds of cultural differences, and that this has led to lack of understanding and distrust in EU-China relations. It called, therefore, on the Chinese leadership to reconsider and to respect the universality of human rights and on the EU institutions to work together with the Chinese authorities in their dialogues in order to advance respect for universality. Parliament went on to state its concern that China is currently the world's largest executioner and continues to impose the death penalty in secret on thousands of people annually. It emphasised once again that abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity and the progressive development of human rights. On the issue of corruption, Parliament noted that certain commitments have been put forward by President Xi to ‘comprehensively advance ruling the country according to the law’, along with combating corruption. It is also deeply concerned that the Chinese government is continuing its hardline policies against the Tibetan people , especially by rejecting the Dalai Lama's ‘Middle Way Approach’ which seeks neither independence nor separation but a genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese Constitution. Members called for the Chinese government to re-enter into a dialogue with Tibetan representatives. Parliament urged European companies investing in China to respect international labour standards and to make commitments to go beyond Chinese labour rights, if these do not meet internationally agreed standards. Cross-strait relations : Parliament advocated negotiating a bilateral investment agreement between the EU and Taiwan , given that Taiwan was, at regional level, the best gateway to China for EU businesses and that numerous states – including China – have concluded such (de facto) agreements with Taiwan. Whilst commending the acceptance by the Chinese government of Taiwan's participation in some UN organisations (WHO, ICAO), Parliament expressed its concern at the Chinese government's reaffirmation of the 2005 Anti-Secession Law that allows for the use of military means in the case of a declaration of independence by Taiwan. It deplored the fact that there are still 1 500 long-range missiles aimed at Taiwan from southern China and took the view that a gradual demilitarisation of the region would further facilitate the rapprochement of the parties. Parliament emphasised that all cross-Strait disputes should be settled by peaceful means on the basis of international law and stressed that the meeting on 23 May 2015 on Kinmen Island between top officials from the two sides of the Taiwan Strait was an encouraging step.
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 159
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/02474
    New
    • AFET/8/02474
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.40.17 Relations with BRIC countries
    New
    6.40.17
    Relations with BRIC countries
    2015-12-18Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0458 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0458/2015
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    2015-12-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate scheduled
    2015-12-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/2/docs/0/text

    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Bastiaan Belder (ECR, NL) on EU-China relations. It noted that 2015 marks the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China. The EU-China Strategic Partnership is of key importance to relations between the EU and China and to finding mutual answers to a range of global concerns.

      EU-China Strategic Partnership and Cooperation: the report welcomed the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China as a source of inspiration to strengthen the Strategic Partnership, and to speed up the ongoing negotiations for a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement based on trust, transparency and respect for human rights. It stressed the need for EU Member States to speak with one voice to the Chinese Government, particularly in view of Beijing's present reshaping of the global governance architecture. In this respect, Members:

      • looked forward to a close cooperation of the EU with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) but regretted the lack of close coordination at EU level regarding several Member States' membership of the AIIB;
      • stressed the importance of trade and investment policy, as the most obvious area to exert maximum leverage in the strategic relationship with China;
      • took note of the recently developed cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries, also known as the 16+1 group, which includes several EU Member States, but considered that this should not divide the EU or weaken its position vis-à-vis China and should also address human rights issues.

      Members called on the European External Action Service and the Commission to submit an annual report to Parliament on the development of EU-China relations. The EEAS was asked to ensure that human rights are high on the agenda in relations and dialogues with China.

      The report went on to underline the importance of the Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIT) between the EU and China currently under negotiation. It called, inter alia, for a fully-fledged sustainable development chapter to be included in the BIT, which provides for binding commitments with respect to ILO core labour standards and key Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Whilst welcoming the fact that over the last decades a considerable number of Chinese citizens have been lifted out of extreme poverty thanks to substantial economic growth, Members voiced, nonetheless, their concern that these economic improvements often cause environmental problems and great inequalities.

      They also recalled that the EU Ombudsman in her draft recommendation adopted on 26 March 2015 criticised the absence of a human rights impact assessment in relation to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism in the negotiations for a trade and investment agreement with Vietnam. Members noted that this sets an important precedent for the negotiations for the EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement.

      Internal situation: the committee observed that China’s human rights record remained a matter of serious concern. It discussed the adoption of several pieces of repressive legislation, including the draft Foreign NGO Management Law, and the new draft law on cybersecurity. Members called on the European Council, the EEAS and the Commission to continue to complain forcefully to the Chinese authorities against these highly controversial measures.

      They expressed concern at the recent political and civil unrest in Hong Kong, and called on China to abide by its obligations to the people of Hong Kong to preserve their rights and freedoms.

      External situation: the committee noted that since its launch President Xi’s ‘Chinese Dream’ of national rejuvenation foresees a more proactive role for China in the world. It encouraged the VP/HR to explore the possibilities of developing a common approach to China with the US wherever this would contribute to advancing EU interests. It noted the priority given by President Xi's presidency to the relationship with the US, given his proposal for a 'new type of major power relationship' between China, the US and other regional actors. Members favoured a more constructive approach to a new world order which China should help construe and integrate, one founded on the universal values of human rights, democracy and human security. Members called on the EU to be more active in Asia, and to cooperate with China, the US and other regional actors for more stability in the region.

      Members went on to discuss the expansion of the Chinese navy, calling for a balanced attitude, to avoid worries on the part of China's neighbours and more tension in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and to guarantee Europe's crucial interest in freedom of navigation on the seas. They called on the VP/HR to identify the risks to peace and security in the region as well as globally should armed conflict arise in the East and South China Seas, in line with the priorities set forth in the European Maritime Security Strategy, what risks this would entail for the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, and what risks exist there to specific European interests.

      The Chinese Government was urged to use all its levers of influence to ensure stability in the Korean peninsula and to induce North Korea to return to credible denuclearisation talks.

      Human rights situation: Members noted the recent worsening of the situation of human rights in China started in 2013 and has intensified an already existing crackdown over the population. They were concerned that in the official Chinese view, the universality of human rights is questioned on grounds of cultural differences, and that this has led to lack of understanding and distrust in EU-China relations. They called, therefore, on the Chinese leadership to reconsider and to respect the universality of human rights and on the EU institutions to work together with the Chinese authorities in their dialogues in order to advance respect for universality.

      Members want on to state their concern that China is currently the world's largest executioner and continues to impose the death penalty in secret on thousands of people annually. They were also deeply concerned that the Chinese government is continuing its hardline policies against the Tibetan people, especially by rejecting the Dalai Lama's ‘Middle Way Approach’ which seeks neither independence nor separation but a genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese Constitution. They called for the Chinese government to re-enter into a dialogue with Tibetan representatives.

      Cross-strait relations: Members advocated negotiating a bilateral investment agreement between the EU and Taiwan, given that Taiwan was, at regional level, the best gateway to China for EU businesses and that numerous states – including China – have concluded such (de facto) agreements with Taiwan.

      Whilst commending the acceptance by the Chinese government of Taiwan's participation in some UN organisations (WHO, ICAO), the committee expressed its concern at the Chinese government's reaffirmation of the 2005 Anti-Secession Law that allows for the use of military means in the case of a declaration of independence by Taiwan. It felt that a gradual demilitarisation of the region would further facilitate the rapprochement of the parties, emphasising that all cross-strait disputes should be settled by peaceful means on the basis of international law.
    2015-12-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/3/date
    Old
    2015-12-16T00:00:00
    New
    2015-12-15T00:00:00
    activities/4/date
    Old
    2015-12-17T00:00:00
    New
    2015-12-16T00:00:00
    2015-12-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0350&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0350/2015
    2015-12-03Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2015-12-14T00:00:00
    New
    2015-12-02T00:00:00
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/3
    date
    2015-12-16T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2015-12-17T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    2015-11-28Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/1
    date
    2015-11-26T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: LEINEN Jo group: ALDE name: VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis group: GUE/NGL name: MÉLENCHON Jean-Luc group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: BELDER Bas
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    2015-10-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2015-10-26T00:00:00
    New
    2015-12-14T00:00:00
    2015-05-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/6
    group
    EFD
    name
    CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    committees/0/shadows/6
    group
    EFD
    name
    CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    2015-03-12Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio
    • group: S&D name: LEINEN Jo
    • group: ALDE name: VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis
    • group: GUE/NGL name: MÉLENCHON Jean-Luc
    • group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut
    • group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2015-06-10T00:00:00
    New
    2015-10-26T00:00:00
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio
    • group: S&D name: LEINEN Jo
    • group: ALDE name: VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis
    • group: GUE/NGL name: MÉLENCHON Jean-Luc
    • group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut
    • group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
    2015-01-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/1
    date
    2015-06-10T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    2015-01-20Show (5) Changes
    activities
    • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: BELDER Bas
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2014-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: BELDER Bas
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/02474
      geographical_area
      China
      reference
      2015/2003(INI)
      title
      EU-China relations
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.40.17 Relations with BRIC countries
      @parltrack
      @parltrack@eupolicy.social
      [javascript protected email address]
      code AGPLv3.0+
      data ODBLv1.0
      site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

      ParlTrack - 2011-2024

      © European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
      Hosted by AS250.net Foundation