BETA


2015/2051(INI) Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion AFET VALENCIANO Elena (icon: S&D S&D) Javier COUSO PERMUY (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Arne GERICKE (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion FEMM HEDH Anna (icon: S&D S&D) Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA (icon: ALDE ALDE), Stefan ECK (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Anna ZÁBORSKÁ (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/05/03
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/12/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/12/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 395 votes to 63, with 244 abstentions, a resolution on preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS): challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance.

Parliament recalled that the number of people in need has more than doubled since 2004 to over 100 million in 2015. It also noted that:

250 million people are affected by humanitarian crises; the number of forcibly displaced persons has reached its highest point since World War II at nearly 60 million; over half of the world’s refugees are children; a billion people could be displaced because of climate change by 2050, with more than 40 % of the global population living in areas of severe water stress; economic losses from natural disasters are likely to increase dramatically from the USD 300 billion currently lost annually.

In view of this, Parliament felt it was time to pass from global consultations to global action . It called on Member States to support the WHS and to reach firm Council conclusions, with specific commitments and priority areas for action, while pursuing better coordination with emerging donors, based on politically non-biased aid as well as on humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.

Parliament called for a coherent and solid new action plan for the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid that guarantees an impartial and effective European humanitarian response , tailored to the local context while being age and gender specific and acting without discrimination and in proportion to needs.

Parliament stressed that today’s enormous humanitarian challenges require a more inclusive and truly global humanitarian system while ensuring people-centred and human rights-based protection responses.

It emphasised that, in order to be meaningful, the WHS outcome document should include a five-year roadmap for concrete political commitments undertaken , linking the post-2015 development agenda, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 21).

It called for a global, comprehensive and long-term solution for the masses of people fleeing conflict regions , noting that Europe’s role and credibility on the global humanitarian scene is also at stake in the response in the EU to the current crisis.

Objectives of the summit : Parliament considered that the WHS should mainly:

commit to a systematic, and participatory approach, for affected people to take part in the whole cycle of humanitarian action; work towards the institutionalisation, better monitoring and evaluation of the UN Accountability to Affected Populations framework; reflect on the vital need for UN reform towards an inclusive, transparent and effective coordination system, with a more inclusive and operative Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Transformative Agenda; increase complementarity between humanitarian and development aid in order to address effectiveness and the humanitarian financing gaps.

For its part, the EU should, as the world’s largest humanitarian aid donor, show leadership in the WHS by calling for more flexible methods for delivering humanitarian aid, as well as for effective tools for preventing crises.

Serving the needs of people in conflict : Parliament called on the EU to place protection at the heart of humanitarian action. It stressed the need for the institutionalisation of the role of protection officers, and for the development of strategic and integrated approaches with sufficient funds for protection activities also in the first phase of emergencies. It urged the EU to commit more strongly to a human rights-based approach in humanitarian action to ensure that the dignity, and the needs and rights, of specific vulnerable groups – especially women, youth, migrants, people living with HIV, LGBTI persons and persons with disabilities – are respected.

It also called for the WHS to put in place a comprehensive agreement on practical ways to reinforce the respect and compliance of international human rights law (IHRL) and refugee law.

Refugee crisis : Parliament underlined that migrants must be offered the same level of protection of their rights as guaranteed to all other groups in times of crises. It stressed the need to expand the Refugee Convention and the Kampala Convention to protect and assist displaced people around the world, as well as those affected by climate change, and also to protect them from various forms of violence.

Stressing the need for a fundamental shift in the support offered to refugees and to host countries and communities, Parliament called on the WHS to examine a comprehensive “refugee hosting deal” that recognises host countries’ contributions , arranges longer-term, predictable and sustainable financial packages to assist them, makes refugees self-reliant by giving them access to livelihood opportunities, and creates more equitable arrangements for their resettlement in third countries .

Calling for a wide, participatory code of conduct among current and new donors, such as those reflected in the Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) principles, Parliament asked the Union and all international actors to improve, in refugee camps, techniques for providing humanitarian assistance, particularly by improving hygiene and distribution of drinking water.

It urged that the provision of humanitarian aid follow international humanitarian law and that EU humanitarian aid not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors.

Parliament condemned the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a war weapon in humanitarian emergencies. All staff involved in the provision of humanitarian assistance, including police and military forces, should receive adequate gender-sensitive training. In this regard, Parliament called for a global commitment to ensure that women and girls are safe from the start of every emergency or crisis by addressing the risk of sexual and gender-based violence.

Depoliticisation of humanitarian assistance : Parliament stressed that it is imperative to differentiate the humanitarian response from foreign, political, security and counter-terrorism considerations. It insisted that counter-terrorism measures should neither undermine nor obstruct humanitarian efforts, and invites the WHS to address this issue in an appropriate way.

Humanitarian effectiveness : Parliament condemned the consistent thwarting of attempts to deliver humanitarian aid and any action that violates the principles guarding against “non-assistance to persons in danger.” It was deeply concerned about the recurrent attacks on both humanitarian workers and infrastructures, including hospitals. More work is needed to improve their safety. Members felt that there must be a clear distinction between civilian humanitarian and military actors, and that the civil humanitarian response must be prioritised.

Given the alarming number of children who are denied education and the huge potential of education to increase people’s resilience, Parliament called on the Council to endorse the Commission’s proposal to dedicate 4 % of the EU humanitarian aid budget to this purpose . At the same time, it called for the establishment of a global fund for humanitarian assistance (GFHA) that supports the participation of non-DAC donors and brings together all existing international financial mechanisms, domestic resources and pooled funds (UN emergency response funds, CERF funds, trust funds, etc.) and that is complemented by voluntary financial payments by governments, the private sector and regional organisations.

Parliament urged governments, donors and their enabling environments to simplify administrative requirements for implementing partners. They also called on the WHS to establish a new deal for engagement with fragile states and protracted crisis with sustainable programmes.

Reducing vulnerability : Parliament underlined that an international response should build on existing local or national initiatives and partnerships rather than create parallel efforts. It stressed the need for a new global model for complementarity on which to base cooperation between humanitarian and development actors, starting with joint analyses and programming. Such a model should include:

entry strategies for development actors allowing them to build bridges in the field, crisis modifiers in development programmes, and, exit strategies for humanitarian responses; accountable and flexible multiannual funding mechanism for responding to protracted crises.

It called on the Commission to present an initiative to link humanitarian aid, development cooperation and resilience in a more systematic way, so as to enable the EU to be more flexible and effective in responding to growing needs.

Managing risk : Parliament stressed the importance of disaster risk reduction for resilience in four priority areas:

1) understanding disaster risks;

2) strengthening risk governance to manage disaster risk;

3) investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, contingency plans and early warning systems; and

4) enhance disaster preparedness for effective response, and to “build back better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction.

Parliament also underlined that disaster preparedness, risk reduction and resilience should systematically be incorporated into the response plans to be provided by local, regional and national administrations, industry and civil society. It called on the WHS to give strong emphasis to the issue of climate change and humanitarian action.

Transformation through innovation : Parliament stressed the importance of minimum humanitarian standards to boost essential public services, such as education, nutrition, health, shelter, water and sanitation throughout humanitarian responses. It believed that public-private and cross-sectorial partnerships could be a means to complement the public response to growing humanitarian needs. It acknowledged that while only a small proportion of humanitarian assistance is currently cash-based , the use of cash-based assistance has significant potential as an innovative, dignifying, safe, gender sensitive, flexible and cost-efficient modality to cover the emergency basic needs of the most vulnerable. It called on the EU and its Member States to promote the common principles and the use of unconditional cash assistance.

Parliament emphasised the role of new technologies and innovative digital tools in the organisation and delivery of the humanitarian aid, particularly in remote areas and disaster zones. It highlighted that Africa, and especially sub-Saharan Africa, is currently undergoing a mobile digital revolution with a surge in mobile subscriptions (and mobile internet use), makings such tools crucial for putting in place early warning systems and for providing speedy information on health matters, danger areas and aid contacts.

The EU was also asked to explore and encourage partnerships with start-ups, and with insurance and technology companies, with a view to developing tools for preparedness and deployment in emergencies. Parliament also called for the involvement of businesses, especially SMEs, while respecting humanitarian principles and ethical standards.

Lastly, Parliament emphasised the need to ensure predictable and timely funding for humanitarian aid through the EU budget.

Documents
2015/12/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/12/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/11/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Development adopted the report by Enrique GUERRERO SALOM (S&D, ES) on preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS): challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance.

Members recalled that the number of people in need has more than doubled since 2004 to over 100 million in 2015. They also noted that:

250 million people are affected by humanitarian crises; the number of forcibly displaced persons has reached its highest point since World War II at nearly 60 million; over half of the world’s refugees are children; economic losses from natural disasters are likely to increase dramatically from the USD 300 billion currently lost annually.

In view of this, Members felt it was time to pass from global consultations to global action . They called on Member States to support the WHS and to reach firm Council conclusions, with specific commitments and priority areas for action, while pursuing better coordination with emerging donors, based on politically non-biased aid as well as on humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.

Members stressed that today’s enormous humanitarian challenges require a more inclusive and truly global humanitarian system while ensuring people-centred and human rights-based protection responses.

They emphasised that, in order to be meaningful, the WHS outcome document should include a five-year roadmap for concrete political commitments undertaken , linking the post-2015 development agenda, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 21).

Members called for a global, comprehensive and long-term solution for the masses of people fleeing conflict regions , noting that Europe’s role and credibility on the global humanitarian scene is also at stake in the response in the EU to the current crisis.

Objectives of the summit: Members considered that the WHS should mainly:

commit to a systematic, and participatory approach, for affected people to take part in the whole cycle of humanitarian action; work towards the institutionalisation, better monitoring and evaluation of the UN Accountability to Affected Populations framework; reflect on the vital need for UN reform towards an inclusive, transparent and effective coordination system, with a more inclusive and operative Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Transformative Agenda; increase complementarity between humanitarian and development aid in order to address effectiveness and the humanitarian financing gaps.

For its part, the EU should, as the world’s largest humanitarian aid donor, show leadership in the WHS by calling for more flexible methods for delivering humanitarian aid, as well as for effective tools for preventing crises.

Serving the needs of people in conflict : Members called on the EU to place protection at the heart of humanitarian action. It urged a stronger commitment to a human rights-based approach in humanitarian action. They called for the WHS to put in place a comprehensive agreement on practical ways to reinforce the respect and compliance of international human rights law (IHRL) and refugee law. They underlined that migrants must be offered the same level of protection of their rights as guaranteed to all other groups in times of crises.

Calling for a wide, participatory code of conduct among current and new donors, such as those reflected in the GHD principles, Members asked the Union and all international actors to improve, in refugee camps, techniques for providing humanitarian assistance, particularly by improving hygiene and distribution of drinking water.

They urged that the provision of humanitarian aid follow international humanitarian law and that EU humanitarian aid not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors.

The report condemned the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a war weapon in humanitarian emergencies. All staff involved in the provision of humanitarian assistance, including police and military forces, should receive adequate gender-sensitive training.

Depoliticisation of humanitarian assistance : Members stressed that it is imperative to differentiate the humanitarian response from foreign, political, security and counter-terrorism considerations. They insisted that counter-terrorism measures should neither undermine nor obstruct humanitarian efforts, and invites the WHS to address this issue in an appropriate way

Humanitarian effectiveness : the committee condemned the consistent thwarting of attempts to deliver humanitarian aid and any action that violates the principles guarding against “non-assistance to persons in danger.” It was deeply concerned about the recurrent attacks on both humanitarian workers and infrastructures, including hospitals. More work is needed to improve their safety. Members felt that there must be a clear distinction between civilian humanitarian and military actors, and that the civil humanitarian response must be prioritised.

Given the alarming number of children who are denied education and the huge potential of education to increase people’s resilience, Members called on the Council to endorse the Commission’s proposal to dedicate 4 % of the EU humanitarian aid budget to this purpose . At the same time, they called for the establishment of a global fund for humanitarian assistance (GFHA) that supports the participation of non-DAC donors and brings together all existing international financial mechanisms, domestic resources and pooled funds (UN emergency response funds, CERF funds, trust funds, etc.). They urged governments, donors and their enabling environments to simplify administrative requirements for implementing partners. They also called on the WHS to establish a new deal for engagement with fragile states and protracted crisis with sustainable programmes.

Reducing vulnerability : the report underlined that an international response should build on existing local or national initiatives and partnerships rather than create parallel efforts. It stressed the need for a new global model for complementarity on which to base cooperation between humanitarian and development actors, starting with joint analyses and programming. Such a model should include:

entry strategies for development actors allowing them to build bridges in the field, crisis modifiers in development programmes, and, exit strategies for humanitarian responses; accountable and flexible multiannual funding mechanism for responding to protracted crises.

Members called on the Commission to present an initiative to link humanitarian aid, development cooperation and resilience in a more systematic way, so as to enable the EU to be more flexible and effective in responding to growing needs.

Managing risk : Members stresses the importance of disaster risk reduction for resilience in four priority areas:

1) understanding disaster risks;

2) strengthening risk governance to manage disaster risk;

3) investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, contingency plans and early warning systems; and

4) enhance disaster preparedness for effective response, and to “build back better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction.

They underlined that disaster preparedness, risk reduction and resilience should systematically be incorporated into the response plans to be provided by local, regional and national administrations, industry and civil society.

They also called on the WHS to give strong emphasis to the issue of climate change and humanitarian action.

Transformation through innovation : Members believed that public-private and cross-sectorial partnerships could be a means to complement the public response to growing humanitarian needs. They acknowledges that while only a small proportion of humanitarian assistance is currently cash-based , the use of cash-based assistance has significant potential as an innovative, dignifying, safe, gender sensitive, flexible and cost-efficient modality to cover the emergency basic needs of the most vulnerable. They called on the EU and its Member States to promote the common principles and the use of unconditional cash assistance.

Members emphasised the role of new technologies and innovative digital tools in the organisation and delivery of the humanitarian aid, particularly in remote areas and disaster zones. They highlighted that Africa, and especially sub-Saharan Africa, is currently undergoing a mobile digital revolution with a surge in mobile subscriptions (and mobile internet use), makings such tools crucial for putting in place early warning systems and for providing speedy information on health matters, danger areas and aid contacts.

The EU was also asked to explore and encourage partnerships with start-ups, and with insurance and technology companies, with a view to developing tools for preparedness and deployment in emergencies.

Lastly, Members emphasised the need to ensure predictable and timely funding for humanitarian aid through the EU budget.

Documents
2015/11/10
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/10/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/10/21
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/10/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/09/17
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/05/06
   EP - VALENCIANO Elena (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2015/04/28
   EP - HEDH Anna (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2015/03/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/12/10
   EP - GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom - Résolution #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 395, 0: 244, -: 63
DE FR IT ES GB BE RO SE PT BG CZ FI LT NL AT LU HU EE DK LV HR SI EL CY IE SK MT PL
Total
86
69
66
46
70
21
30
19
20
17
19
12
11
25
16
5
19
6
12
8
11
7
22
6
10
13
6
49
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
203

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Cyprus PPE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom - § 34/3 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: -: 384, +: 308, 0: 10
IT ES RO PT EL LU LT EE CY CZ BE SE IE DK FI MT BG HR SI NL SK LV AT HU DE FR GB PL
Total
68
46
29
20
22
5
11
6
6
19
21
19
10
12
11
6
17
11
7
25
13
7
16
20
86
69
70
49
icon: S&D S&D
179

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46
3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14
3

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
203

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3
4

A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom - § 34/4 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: -: 548, +: 142, 0: 11
LU BE EE NL IE FI CY LT EL HR DK SI CZ MT LV BG PT ES SE SK AT HU RO IT FR PL GB DE
Total
5
20
6
25
10
11
6
11
22
11
12
7
19
6
7
17
20
46
19
13
16
20
30
67
69
49
70
86
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14
3

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
69

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: S&D S&D
179

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

4

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

4

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
202

Luxembourg PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
4
AmendmentsDossier
233 2015/2051(INI)
2015/09/25 AFET 66 amendments...
source: 567.736
2015/09/29 FEMM 39 amendments...
source: 567.829
2015/10/21 DEVE 128 amendments...
source: 569.817

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.888
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-PR-551888_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.156&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-565156_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.200&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-565200_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.817
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AM-569817_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-11-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0332_EN.html title: A8-0332/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-11-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0332_EN.html title: A8-0332/2015
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-12-15-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0459_EN.html title: T8-0459/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0459_EN.html title: T8-0459/2015
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique date: 2014-12-10T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2014-12-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: VALENCIANO Elena date: 2015-05-06T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-05-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VALENCIANO Elena group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: HEDH Anna date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HEDH Anna group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0332&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0332_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0459
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0459_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-03-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2015-05-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: VALENCIANO Elena body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2014-12-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: HEDH Anna
  • date: 2015-11-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2015-05-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: VALENCIANO Elena body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2014-12-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: HEDH Anna
  • date: 2015-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0332&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0332/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0459 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0459/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO) commissioner: STYLIANIDES Christos
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2014-12-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2015-05-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: VALENCIANO Elena
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-05-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VALENCIANO Elena group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2014-12-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HEDH Anna group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: S&D name: HEDH Anna
docs
  • date: 2015-09-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.888 title: PE551.888 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.156&secondRef=02 title: PE565.156 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.200&secondRef=02 title: PE565.200 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.817 title: PE569.817 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26390&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)190 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-03-12T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0332&language=EN title: A8-0332/2015 summary: The Committee on Development adopted the report by Enrique GUERRERO SALOM (S&D, ES) on preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS): challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance. Members recalled that the number of people in need has more than doubled since 2004 to over 100 million in 2015. They also noted that: 250 million people are affected by humanitarian crises; the number of forcibly displaced persons has reached its highest point since World War II at nearly 60 million; over half of the world’s refugees are children; economic losses from natural disasters are likely to increase dramatically from the USD 300 billion currently lost annually. In view of this, Members felt it was time to pass from global consultations to global action . They called on Member States to support the WHS and to reach firm Council conclusions, with specific commitments and priority areas for action, while pursuing better coordination with emerging donors, based on politically non-biased aid as well as on humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence. Members stressed that today’s enormous humanitarian challenges require a more inclusive and truly global humanitarian system while ensuring people-centred and human rights-based protection responses. They emphasised that, in order to be meaningful, the WHS outcome document should include a five-year roadmap for concrete political commitments undertaken , linking the post-2015 development agenda, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 21). Members called for a global, comprehensive and long-term solution for the masses of people fleeing conflict regions , noting that Europe’s role and credibility on the global humanitarian scene is also at stake in the response in the EU to the current crisis. Objectives of the summit: Members considered that the WHS should mainly: commit to a systematic, and participatory approach, for affected people to take part in the whole cycle of humanitarian action; work towards the institutionalisation, better monitoring and evaluation of the UN Accountability to Affected Populations framework; reflect on the vital need for UN reform towards an inclusive, transparent and effective coordination system, with a more inclusive and operative Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Transformative Agenda; increase complementarity between humanitarian and development aid in order to address effectiveness and the humanitarian financing gaps. For its part, the EU should, as the world’s largest humanitarian aid donor, show leadership in the WHS by calling for more flexible methods for delivering humanitarian aid, as well as for effective tools for preventing crises. Serving the needs of people in conflict : Members called on the EU to place protection at the heart of humanitarian action. It urged a stronger commitment to a human rights-based approach in humanitarian action. They called for the WHS to put in place a comprehensive agreement on practical ways to reinforce the respect and compliance of international human rights law (IHRL) and refugee law. They underlined that migrants must be offered the same level of protection of their rights as guaranteed to all other groups in times of crises. Calling for a wide, participatory code of conduct among current and new donors, such as those reflected in the GHD principles, Members asked the Union and all international actors to improve, in refugee camps, techniques for providing humanitarian assistance, particularly by improving hygiene and distribution of drinking water. They urged that the provision of humanitarian aid follow international humanitarian law and that EU humanitarian aid not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors. The report condemned the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a war weapon in humanitarian emergencies. All staff involved in the provision of humanitarian assistance, including police and military forces, should receive adequate gender-sensitive training. Depoliticisation of humanitarian assistance : Members stressed that it is imperative to differentiate the humanitarian response from foreign, political, security and counter-terrorism considerations. They insisted that counter-terrorism measures should neither undermine nor obstruct humanitarian efforts, and invites the WHS to address this issue in an appropriate way Humanitarian effectiveness : the committee condemned the consistent thwarting of attempts to deliver humanitarian aid and any action that violates the principles guarding against “non-assistance to persons in danger.” It was deeply concerned about the recurrent attacks on both humanitarian workers and infrastructures, including hospitals. More work is needed to improve their safety. Members felt that there must be a clear distinction between civilian humanitarian and military actors, and that the civil humanitarian response must be prioritised. Given the alarming number of children who are denied education and the huge potential of education to increase people’s resilience, Members called on the Council to endorse the Commission’s proposal to dedicate 4 % of the EU humanitarian aid budget to this purpose . At the same time, they called for the establishment of a global fund for humanitarian assistance (GFHA) that supports the participation of non-DAC donors and brings together all existing international financial mechanisms, domestic resources and pooled funds (UN emergency response funds, CERF funds, trust funds, etc.). They urged governments, donors and their enabling environments to simplify administrative requirements for implementing partners. They also called on the WHS to establish a new deal for engagement with fragile states and protracted crisis with sustainable programmes. Reducing vulnerability : the report underlined that an international response should build on existing local or national initiatives and partnerships rather than create parallel efforts. It stressed the need for a new global model for complementarity on which to base cooperation between humanitarian and development actors, starting with joint analyses and programming. Such a model should include: entry strategies for development actors allowing them to build bridges in the field, crisis modifiers in development programmes, and, exit strategies for humanitarian responses; accountable and flexible multiannual funding mechanism for responding to protracted crises. Members called on the Commission to present an initiative to link humanitarian aid, development cooperation and resilience in a more systematic way, so as to enable the EU to be more flexible and effective in responding to growing needs. Managing risk : Members stresses the importance of disaster risk reduction for resilience in four priority areas: 1) understanding disaster risks; 2) strengthening risk governance to manage disaster risk; 3) investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, contingency plans and early warning systems; and 4) enhance disaster preparedness for effective response, and to “build back better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. They underlined that disaster preparedness, risk reduction and resilience should systematically be incorporated into the response plans to be provided by local, regional and national administrations, industry and civil society. They also called on the WHS to give strong emphasis to the issue of climate change and humanitarian action. Transformation through innovation : Members believed that public-private and cross-sectorial partnerships could be a means to complement the public response to growing humanitarian needs. They acknowledges that while only a small proportion of humanitarian assistance is currently cash-based , the use of cash-based assistance has significant potential as an innovative, dignifying, safe, gender sensitive, flexible and cost-efficient modality to cover the emergency basic needs of the most vulnerable. They called on the EU and its Member States to promote the common principles and the use of unconditional cash assistance. Members emphasised the role of new technologies and innovative digital tools in the organisation and delivery of the humanitarian aid, particularly in remote areas and disaster zones. They highlighted that Africa, and especially sub-Saharan Africa, is currently undergoing a mobile digital revolution with a surge in mobile subscriptions (and mobile internet use), makings such tools crucial for putting in place early warning systems and for providing speedy information on health matters, danger areas and aid contacts. The EU was also asked to explore and encourage partnerships with start-ups, and with insurance and technology companies, with a view to developing tools for preparedness and deployment in emergencies. Lastly, Members emphasised the need to ensure predictable and timely funding for humanitarian aid through the EU budget.
  • date: 2015-12-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26390&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0459 title: T8-0459/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 395 votes to 63, with 244 abstentions, a resolution on preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS): challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance. Parliament recalled that the number of people in need has more than doubled since 2004 to over 100 million in 2015. It also noted that: 250 million people are affected by humanitarian crises; the number of forcibly displaced persons has reached its highest point since World War II at nearly 60 million; over half of the world’s refugees are children; a billion people could be displaced because of climate change by 2050, with more than 40 % of the global population living in areas of severe water stress; economic losses from natural disasters are likely to increase dramatically from the USD 300 billion currently lost annually. In view of this, Parliament felt it was time to pass from global consultations to global action . It called on Member States to support the WHS and to reach firm Council conclusions, with specific commitments and priority areas for action, while pursuing better coordination with emerging donors, based on politically non-biased aid as well as on humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence. Parliament called for a coherent and solid new action plan for the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid that guarantees an impartial and effective European humanitarian response , tailored to the local context while being age and gender specific and acting without discrimination and in proportion to needs. Parliament stressed that today’s enormous humanitarian challenges require a more inclusive and truly global humanitarian system while ensuring people-centred and human rights-based protection responses. It emphasised that, in order to be meaningful, the WHS outcome document should include a five-year roadmap for concrete political commitments undertaken , linking the post-2015 development agenda, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 21). It called for a global, comprehensive and long-term solution for the masses of people fleeing conflict regions , noting that Europe’s role and credibility on the global humanitarian scene is also at stake in the response in the EU to the current crisis. Objectives of the summit : Parliament considered that the WHS should mainly: commit to a systematic, and participatory approach, for affected people to take part in the whole cycle of humanitarian action; work towards the institutionalisation, better monitoring and evaluation of the UN Accountability to Affected Populations framework; reflect on the vital need for UN reform towards an inclusive, transparent and effective coordination system, with a more inclusive and operative Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Transformative Agenda; increase complementarity between humanitarian and development aid in order to address effectiveness and the humanitarian financing gaps. For its part, the EU should, as the world’s largest humanitarian aid donor, show leadership in the WHS by calling for more flexible methods for delivering humanitarian aid, as well as for effective tools for preventing crises. Serving the needs of people in conflict : Parliament called on the EU to place protection at the heart of humanitarian action. It stressed the need for the institutionalisation of the role of protection officers, and for the development of strategic and integrated approaches with sufficient funds for protection activities also in the first phase of emergencies. It urged the EU to commit more strongly to a human rights-based approach in humanitarian action to ensure that the dignity, and the needs and rights, of specific vulnerable groups – especially women, youth, migrants, people living with HIV, LGBTI persons and persons with disabilities – are respected. It also called for the WHS to put in place a comprehensive agreement on practical ways to reinforce the respect and compliance of international human rights law (IHRL) and refugee law. Refugee crisis : Parliament underlined that migrants must be offered the same level of protection of their rights as guaranteed to all other groups in times of crises. It stressed the need to expand the Refugee Convention and the Kampala Convention to protect and assist displaced people around the world, as well as those affected by climate change, and also to protect them from various forms of violence. Stressing the need for a fundamental shift in the support offered to refugees and to host countries and communities, Parliament called on the WHS to examine a comprehensive “refugee hosting deal” that recognises host countries’ contributions , arranges longer-term, predictable and sustainable financial packages to assist them, makes refugees self-reliant by giving them access to livelihood opportunities, and creates more equitable arrangements for their resettlement in third countries . Calling for a wide, participatory code of conduct among current and new donors, such as those reflected in the Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) principles, Parliament asked the Union and all international actors to improve, in refugee camps, techniques for providing humanitarian assistance, particularly by improving hygiene and distribution of drinking water. It urged that the provision of humanitarian aid follow international humanitarian law and that EU humanitarian aid not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors. Parliament condemned the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a war weapon in humanitarian emergencies. All staff involved in the provision of humanitarian assistance, including police and military forces, should receive adequate gender-sensitive training. In this regard, Parliament called for a global commitment to ensure that women and girls are safe from the start of every emergency or crisis by addressing the risk of sexual and gender-based violence. Depoliticisation of humanitarian assistance : Parliament stressed that it is imperative to differentiate the humanitarian response from foreign, political, security and counter-terrorism considerations. It insisted that counter-terrorism measures should neither undermine nor obstruct humanitarian efforts, and invites the WHS to address this issue in an appropriate way. Humanitarian effectiveness : Parliament condemned the consistent thwarting of attempts to deliver humanitarian aid and any action that violates the principles guarding against “non-assistance to persons in danger.” It was deeply concerned about the recurrent attacks on both humanitarian workers and infrastructures, including hospitals. More work is needed to improve their safety. Members felt that there must be a clear distinction between civilian humanitarian and military actors, and that the civil humanitarian response must be prioritised. Given the alarming number of children who are denied education and the huge potential of education to increase people’s resilience, Parliament called on the Council to endorse the Commission’s proposal to dedicate 4 % of the EU humanitarian aid budget to this purpose . At the same time, it called for the establishment of a global fund for humanitarian assistance (GFHA) that supports the participation of non-DAC donors and brings together all existing international financial mechanisms, domestic resources and pooled funds (UN emergency response funds, CERF funds, trust funds, etc.) and that is complemented by voluntary financial payments by governments, the private sector and regional organisations. Parliament urged governments, donors and their enabling environments to simplify administrative requirements for implementing partners. They also called on the WHS to establish a new deal for engagement with fragile states and protracted crisis with sustainable programmes. Reducing vulnerability : Parliament underlined that an international response should build on existing local or national initiatives and partnerships rather than create parallel efforts. It stressed the need for a new global model for complementarity on which to base cooperation between humanitarian and development actors, starting with joint analyses and programming. Such a model should include: entry strategies for development actors allowing them to build bridges in the field, crisis modifiers in development programmes, and, exit strategies for humanitarian responses; accountable and flexible multiannual funding mechanism for responding to protracted crises. It called on the Commission to present an initiative to link humanitarian aid, development cooperation and resilience in a more systematic way, so as to enable the EU to be more flexible and effective in responding to growing needs. Managing risk : Parliament stressed the importance of disaster risk reduction for resilience in four priority areas: 1) understanding disaster risks; 2) strengthening risk governance to manage disaster risk; 3) investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, contingency plans and early warning systems; and 4) enhance disaster preparedness for effective response, and to “build back better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. Parliament also underlined that disaster preparedness, risk reduction and resilience should systematically be incorporated into the response plans to be provided by local, regional and national administrations, industry and civil society. It called on the WHS to give strong emphasis to the issue of climate change and humanitarian action. Transformation through innovation : Parliament stressed the importance of minimum humanitarian standards to boost essential public services, such as education, nutrition, health, shelter, water and sanitation throughout humanitarian responses. It believed that public-private and cross-sectorial partnerships could be a means to complement the public response to growing humanitarian needs. It acknowledged that while only a small proportion of humanitarian assistance is currently cash-based , the use of cash-based assistance has significant potential as an innovative, dignifying, safe, gender sensitive, flexible and cost-efficient modality to cover the emergency basic needs of the most vulnerable. It called on the EU and its Member States to promote the common principles and the use of unconditional cash assistance. Parliament emphasised the role of new technologies and innovative digital tools in the organisation and delivery of the humanitarian aid, particularly in remote areas and disaster zones. It highlighted that Africa, and especially sub-Saharan Africa, is currently undergoing a mobile digital revolution with a surge in mobile subscriptions (and mobile internet use), makings such tools crucial for putting in place early warning systems and for providing speedy information on health matters, danger areas and aid contacts. The EU was also asked to explore and encourage partnerships with start-ups, and with insurance and technology companies, with a view to developing tools for preparedness and deployment in emergencies. Parliament also called for the involvement of businesses, especially SMEs, while respecting humanitarian principles and ethical standards. Lastly, Parliament emphasised the need to ensure predictable and timely funding for humanitarian aid through the EU budget.
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/ title: Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO) commissioner: STYLIANIDES Christos
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/8/02959
New
  • DEVE/8/02959
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.50 Emergency, food, humanitarian aid, aid to refugees, Emergency Aid Reserve
New
6.50
Emergency, food, humanitarian aid, aid to refugees, Emergency Aid Reserve
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151215&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0459 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0459/2015
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Development adopted the report by Enrique GUERRERO SALOM (S&D, ES) on preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS): challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance.

    Members recalled that the number of people in need has more than doubled since 2004 to over 100 million in 2015. They also noted that:

    • 250 million people are affected by humanitarian crises;
    • the number of forcibly displaced persons has reached its highest point since World War II at nearly 60 million;
    • over half of the world’s refugees are children;
    • economic losses from natural disasters are likely to increase dramatically from the USD 300 billion currently lost annually.

    In view of this, Members felt it was time to pass from global consultations to global action. They called on Member States to support the WHS and to reach firm Council conclusions, with specific commitments and priority areas for action, while pursuing better coordination with emerging donors, based on politically non-biased aid as well as on humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.

    Members stressed that today’s enormous humanitarian challenges require a more inclusive and truly global humanitarian system while ensuring people-centred and human rights-based protection responses.

    They emphasised that, in order to be meaningful, the WHS outcome document should include a five-year roadmap for concrete political commitments undertaken, linking the post-2015 development agenda, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 21).

    Members called for a global, comprehensive and long-term solution for the masses of people fleeing conflict regions, noting that Europe’s role and credibility on the global humanitarian scene is also at stake in the response in the EU to the current crisis.

    Objectives of the summit: Members considered that the WHS should mainly:

    • commit to a systematic, and participatory approach, for affected people to take part in the whole cycle of humanitarian action;
    • work towards the institutionalisation, better monitoring and evaluation of the UN Accountability to Affected Populations framework;
    • reflect on the vital need for UN reform towards an inclusive, transparent and effective coordination system, with a more inclusive and operative Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Transformative Agenda;
    • increase complementarity between humanitarian and development aid in order to address effectiveness and the humanitarian financing gaps.

    For its part, the EU should, as the world’s largest humanitarian aid donor, show leadership in the WHS by calling for more flexible methods for delivering humanitarian aid, as well as for effective tools for preventing crises.

    Serving the needs of people in conflict: Members called on the EU to place protection at the heart of humanitarian action. It urged a stronger commitment to a human rights-based approach in humanitarian action. They called for the WHS to put in place a comprehensive agreement on practical ways to reinforce the respect and compliance of international human rights law (IHRL) and refugee law. They underlined that migrants must be offered the same level of protection of their rights as guaranteed to all other groups in times of crises.

    Calling for a wide, participatory code of conduct among current and new donors, such as those reflected in the GHD principles, Members asked the Union and all international actors to improve, in refugee camps, techniques for providing humanitarian assistance, particularly by improving hygiene and distribution of drinking water.

    They urged that the provision of humanitarian aid follow international humanitarian law and that EU humanitarian aid not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors.

    The report condemned the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a war weapon in humanitarian emergencies. All staff involved in the provision of humanitarian assistance, including police and military forces, should receive adequate gender-sensitive training.

    Depoliticisation of humanitarian assistance: Members stressed that it is imperative to differentiate the humanitarian response from foreign, political, security and counter-terrorism considerations. They insisted that counter-terrorism measures should neither undermine nor obstruct humanitarian efforts, and invites the WHS to address this issue in an appropriate way

    Humanitarian effectiveness: the committee condemned the consistent thwarting of attempts to deliver humanitarian aid and any action that violates the principles guarding against “non-assistance to persons in danger.” It was deeply concerned about the recurrent attacks on both humanitarian workers and infrastructures, including hospitals. More work is needed to improve their safety.  Members felt that there must be a clear distinction between civilian humanitarian and military actors, and that the civil humanitarian response must be prioritised.

    Given the alarming number of children who are denied education and the huge potential of education to increase people’s resilience, Members called on the Council to endorse the Commission’s proposal to dedicate 4 % of the EU humanitarian aid budget to this purpose. At the same time, they called for the establishment of a global fund for humanitarian assistance (GFHA) that supports the participation of non-DAC donors and brings together all existing international financial mechanisms, domestic resources and pooled funds (UN emergency response funds, CERF funds, trust funds, etc.). They urged governments, donors and their enabling environments to simplify administrative requirements for implementing partners. They also called on the WHS to establish a new deal for engagement with fragile states and protracted crisis with sustainable programmes.

    Reducing vulnerability: the report underlined that an international response should build on existing local or national initiatives and partnerships rather than create parallel efforts. It stressed the need for a new global model for complementarity on which to base cooperation between humanitarian and development actors, starting with joint analyses and programming. Such a model should include:

    • entry strategies for development actors allowing them to build bridges in the field,
    • crisis modifiers in development programmes, and,
    • exit strategies for humanitarian responses;
    • accountable and flexible multiannual funding mechanism for responding to protracted crises.

    Members called on the Commission to present an initiative to link humanitarian aid, development cooperation and resilience in a more systematic way, so as to enable the EU to be more flexible and effective in responding to growing needs.

    Managing risk: Members stresses the importance of disaster risk reduction for resilience in four priority areas:

    1) understanding disaster risks;

    2) strengthening risk governance to manage disaster risk;

    3) investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, contingency plans and early warning systems; and

    4) enhance disaster preparedness for effective response, and to “build back better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction.

    They underlined that disaster preparedness, risk reduction and resilience should systematically be incorporated into the response plans to be provided by local, regional and national administrations, industry and civil society.

    They also called on the WHS to give strong emphasis to the issue of climate change and humanitarian action.

    Transformation through innovation: Members believed that public-private and cross-sectorial partnerships could be a means to complement the public response to growing humanitarian needs. They acknowledges that while only a small proportion of humanitarian assistance is currently cash-based, the use of cash-based assistance has significant potential as an innovative, dignifying, safe, gender sensitive, flexible and cost-efficient modality to cover the emergency basic needs of the most vulnerable. They called on the EU and its Member States to promote the common principles and the use of unconditional cash assistance.

    Members emphasised the role of new technologies and innovative digital tools in the organisation and delivery of the humanitarian aid, particularly in remote areas and disaster zones. They highlighted that Africa, and especially sub-Saharan Africa, is currently undergoing a mobile digital revolution with a surge in mobile subscriptions (and mobile internet use), makings such tools crucial for putting in place early warning systems and for providing speedy information on health matters, danger areas and aid contacts.

    The EU was also asked to explore and encourage partnerships with start-ups, and with insurance and technology companies, with a view to developing tools for preparedness and deployment in emergencies. 

    Lastly, Members emphasised the need to ensure predictable and timely funding for humanitarian aid through the EU budget.

activities/4
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
other/0/dg/title
Old
International Cooperation and Development
New
Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO)
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/echo/
activities/3/date
Old
2015-12-14T00:00:00
New
2015-12-15T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0332&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0332/2015
activities/3/date
Old
2015-12-02T00:00:00
New
2015-12-14T00:00:00
activities/2
date
2015-11-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/date
Old
2015-12-14T00:00:00
New
2015-12-02T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2015-11-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
other/0/commissioner
Old
MIMICA Neven
New
STYLIANIDES Christos
procedure/subject/0
Old
6.50 Emergency, food, humanitarian aid, aid to refugees
New
6.50 Emergency, food, humanitarian aid, aid to refugees, Emergency Aid Reserve
activities/0/committees/0/date
2015-05-06T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: VALENCIANO Elena
committees/0/date
2015-05-06T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: VALENCIANO Elena
activities/0/committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
activities/1
date
2015-12-14T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/1/date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: HEDH Anna
committees/1/date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: HEDH Anna
activities/0/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MIMICA Neven
activities
  • date: 2015-03-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2014-12-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2014-12-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique
links
other
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    DEVE/8/02959
    reference
    2015/2051(INI)
    title
    Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Awaiting committee decision
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    6.50 Emergency, food, humanitarian aid, aid to refugees