Awaiting committee decision
2015/2089(INI) Towards improved single market regulation
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2015/09/08
Lead committee dossier: IMCO/8/03048
Legal Basis RoP 052
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2015/09/08
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen (ECR) | CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria (EPP), SCHALDEMOSE Christel (S&D), TØRNÆS Ulla (ALDE), DE JONG Dennis (GUE/NGL), ŠOLTES Igor (Verts/ALE) |
Opinion | JURI |
Legal Basis RoP 052
Subjects
Activites
-
2015/09/08
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
-
2015/04/30
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
Amendments | Dossier |
119 |
2015/2089(INI)
2015/06/10
IMCO
119 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 7 February 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on the governance of the Single Market1, and to the Commission's follow-up thereon adopted on 8 May 2013, __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0054.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that improving single market regulation should be both a priority and a shared responsibility of the Union institutions; believes that good legislation should contribute to competitiveness, the creation of jobs and growth, a high level of consumer protection, and must do
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Considers, however, that analysis should be improved as regards to whether the legislative steps taken so far have contributed effectively to achieving an aim, and whether they still remain necessary;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Considers, however, that analysis should be improved as regards to whether the legislative steps taken so far have contributed effectively to achieving an aim, and whether they still remain necessary;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Considers, however, that analysis should be improved as regards
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Considers, however, that analysis should be improved as regards to whether the legislative steps taken so far have contributed effectively to achieving an aim, and whether they still remain necessary; believes, in this context, that a rolling target for administrative and regulatory unjustified burden reduction can make a positive contribution to ensuring that aims are met in the most efficient way possible;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that the cumulative cost of regulation
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that the cumulative cost of regulation often represent barriers for participants in the single market, particularly for SMEs; welcomes, therefore, the commitment by the Commission to examine this issue;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that the cumulative cost of regulation often represents a barrier
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that the cumulative cost of unnecessary regulation often represent barriers for participants in the single market, particularly for SMEs; welcomes, therefore, the commitment by the Commission to examine this issue; underlines, however, that
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to improve its understanding of the factors influencing the achievement of policy objectives, such as the impact of complementary or clashing policies adopted at EU or national level, in order to direct policy making in a better way and, ultimately, to contribute to improved single market regulation; underlines in this regard the need for appropriate indicators based on clear, comprehensive and multi-dimensional criteria, including social and environmental criteria, in order to properly assess the need and modalities of action at EU level;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to improve its understanding of the factors influencing the achievement of policy objectives, such as the impact of complementary or clashing policies adopted at EU or national level, but also the impact and costs of non- action, in order to
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that improving single market regulation should be both a priority and a shared responsibility of the Union institutions; believes that good legislation should contribute to competitiveness, the creation of jobs and smart and inclusive growth, and must do so in a way that stimulates, rather than frustrates, the European economy;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes that legislation, once adopted, remains largely static
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes that legislation, once adopted, remains largely static and that incentives to respond to, and repeal, outdated legislation are often lacking, while consumer issues and market problems rise and fall as conditions change; considers, therefore, that
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Considers also that improving single market regulation does not mean removing all regulation
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Considers also that improving single market regulation does not mean removing all regulation nor diminishing the level of ambition of regulation for instance in terms of environmental protection, safety, security, consumer protection and social standards, but rather delivering a competitive regulatory environment that supports employment and enterprise within Europe;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Considers also that improving single market regulation does not mean removing all regulation
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Stresses that
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Stresses that a single market that does not over-burden or frustrate production, innovation and commerce is a structure that will bring jobs and growth back to Europe that previously would have been located outside of it
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Understands ‘better regulation' in the context of the whole policy cycle, whereby all elements and all institutions involved contribute to efficient and effective regulation; recalls in this context the importance of transparency and accessibility of information; regrets that while documents of the European Parliament are accessible for the citizens, Council documents are not and remain restricted;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the principle of subsidiarity is
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the principle of subsidiarity
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the principle of subsidiarity is an essential element and
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the responsibility for subsidiarity extends beyond the Commission, the Council and Parliament, and includes a role for national and – where appropriate –regional
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls th
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the responsibility for subsidiarity extends beyond the Commission, the Council and Parliament, and includes a role for national and – where appropriate –regional parliaments; believes that the input of parliaments should be given appropriate weight and consideration in the context of the subsidiarity mechanism, but also as regards political dialogue; therefore encourages the Commission to engage in a yearly debate with each parliament in order to strengthen the dialogue between the national parliaments and the Commission;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses that the European institutions and the national and where applicable regional parliaments still have much to do to create a "subsidiarity culture" across the European Union; strongly believes that a more effective approach is needed to fully recognise the principle of subsidiarity;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the single market is a key tool for reigniting economic growth and job- creation in the Union;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the deadlines involved in the subsidiarity mechanism are sometimes too short to ensure that parliaments
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the deadlines involved in the subsidiarity mechanism are too short to ensure that parliaments always have time to consider in detail aspects of implementation or other practical matters; considers, therefore, that parliaments should be afforded more time to respond
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the deadlines involved in the subsidiarity mechanism sometimes are too short to ensure that national parliaments
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that the national parliaments can contribute further in the decision- making of the European Union by being more pro-active players; considers the possibility of the parliaments to invite the Commission to create new legislation or amend existing, if 1/3 of all national parliaments support it; if a proposal is submitted to the Commission, the Commission should be obliged to respond adequately to the request and give its reasons for taking or not taking action;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that, where the need for European regulation can be demonstrated, the institutions should jointly undertake to ensure that the principle of proportionality
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, more than 20 years after its
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that, where
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that, where the need for European regulation and EU added value can be demonstrated, the institutions should jointly undertake to ensure that the principle of proportionality, as well as the principles of simplicity, transparency, coherence and respect for fundamental rights, are reflected in the drafting of the relevant legislation;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of c
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of the creation of sustainable, high-quality jobs, competitiveness, innovation and growth, and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should have clear evidence of EU added value and be to the benefit of competitiveness, innovation and growth, and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how best to design regulation to achieve these aims and their single market objectives; believes, as well, that if the impact assessment does not provide arguments for clear EU added value that will have a positive impact on citizens and businesses, the legislation should be withdrawn;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of our citizens, including workers and consumers, while stimulating competitiveness, innovation and sustainable growth, and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how best to design regulation to achieve these aims and their single market objectives;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of competitiveness, citizens and consumers, innovation and growth, and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how best to design regulation to achieve these aims and their single market objectives;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Believes that single market legislation should be
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas specific tools should be strengthened, revised or better promoted in order to contribute positively towards providing a competitive regulatory environment for our businesses, supporting growth and the creation of jobs, and enhancing trust of our consumers in European legislation;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission and Council to reflect together with Parliament on how best to ensure that simplification is an ongoing process, as efforts in these areas are of benefit to consumers and SMEs;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that in order to be effective
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that in order to be effective as tools, impact assessments should be prepared on the basis of strong evidence; believes that careful consideration of scientific advice should form part of the impact assessment process and, in particular, substantiate how or why policy choices have been made in preparatory
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that the impact assessment accompanying a proposal should be
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that the impact assessment accompanying a proposal should be seen as a ‘living document' that is kept up to date and
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that the impact assessment accompanying a proposal should be seen as a
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas digital innovation is faster than politics and entrepreneurs are driving the digital agenda; whereas it is of key importance to provide future proof rules that are digital by default;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it necessary to
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Recalls that according to Article 11 (2) TEU, all EU institutions are required to maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations, civil society and social partners;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates its position that consultation processes should be opened up
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates its position that consultation processes should be opened up and expanded to include submissions on draft impact assessments by all stakeholders; believes this is equally important for secondary legislation, which is of great consequence for the implementation of single market regulation and which therefore requires greater transparency and scrutiny;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Stresses the importance of the institutional framework as regards impact assessments; considers it important that the impact assessment process be seen as a joint undertaking, leading to an honest and unimpeachable assessment upon which each of the institutions can depend throughout the process, including in negotiations on a final text;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Believes that wide and proper balanced consultation is essential
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Believes that wide consultation is essential, particularly with regard to informal groupings, such as expert groups involved in standardisation activities, as well as relevant stakeholders, including social partners, consumer, environmental and social organisations, and regional and local authorities; considers the proper balancing of these groups, the publication of documents and evidence, and the invitation to all stakeholders to contribute effectively to the development of policy in this area, to be an important driver for innovation and the strengthening of the single market, particularly with regard to the Digital Single Market agenda;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Underlines that small businesses do not often have the time and resources to participate in regular consultations; considers that the European Commission should find user-friendly and innovative ways to reach out to SMEs and start-ups;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the proper transposition, implementation and enforcement of consumer rights and law is essential in order to achieve a high level of consumer protection in the EU;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers consultation to be an ongoing process rather than an occasional exercise; reiterates, in this regard, its calls on the Commission to consider the establishment of a Stakeholder Forum; is pleased to see the new Commission proposal in the Better Regulation Agenda for the establishment of a REFIT Platform; strongly believes that this bottom-up approach involving different stakeholders such as experts from Member State authorities, businesses, social partners, SMEs and civil society will be a constructive way to give direct input to the EU institutions, particularly in view of the needs to reduce regulatory and administrative burdens; underlines the need for the platform to be very transparent and therefore encourages the platform to be an online tool inspired by the other national Stakeholders Forums, like in Denmark;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers consultation to be an ongoing process rather than an occasional
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Believes that by making public consultations available in all of the official languages, improving their accessibility and intelligibility, the higher corresponding participation and more transparent access to the consultation process will be achieved;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that full and proper implementation of single market legislation to be fundamental
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Considers that as the Commission seeks to reduce its legislative output that this will allow greater focus to be placed on policy initiatives, allowing for greater time and deeper reflection which can be used to foster improved involvement of interested stakeholders;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Emphasizes the importance of correlation tables to monitor correct implementation; calls upon the Member States to draw up their own correlation tables and to publish them;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that it is not only the formal targets for transposition and implementation that are important, but also the quality of transposition, the practical implementation on the ground and the problems or challenges they may involve in real life for the concerned stakeholders;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) D b. whereas one of the main priorities of the European Consumer Summit 2015, an annual forum gathering key European and international policy-makers and stakeholders, was the importance of better implementation and enforcement of the law;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that it is not only the formal targets for transposition and implementation that are important, but also the practical implementation on the ground; therefore encourages the introduction of two yearly fixed dates for implementation in order to simplify the procedure and make it easier for both national authorities but also enterprises and business to follow and comply with the legislation;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Believes that advance warnings and road-maps can help alert concerned individuals to emerging issues and policy decisions which are relevant to them and may be difficult to track;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Considers that,
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Considers that, if the many benefits that a fully functioning single market can offer are to be realised,
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Calls on the Commission to explore initiatives to improve the take-up of consultation by the affected parties themselves, not only their representatives in their national capitals or Brussels; considers that this would make a positive contribution to identifying implementation and enforcement issues that may arise on the ground once regulations are applied;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that the
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to invest more efforts to improve, consolidate and publicise guidance on the regulations and tools in place that contribute to the monitoring of how Union law is being applied and that, as such, are vital to the proper functioning of the single market; regrets that the quality of the services differs vastly among the Member States due to the lack of both prioritisation and resources; therefore calls for an enforced governance framework at EU level in order to improve the functioning of these tools and services;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Encourages the Commission to set- up obligatory implementation groups, consisting of the respective implementing authorities in the Member States, in order to achieve the abovementioned goals; believes that these implementation groups can be a useful way to discuss how the transposed EU law could be applied and how relevant articles should be interpreted in order to ensure better coordination and more consistent application of EU law;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that improving single market regulation should be both a priority and a
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Considers the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and online dispute resolution (ODR) to be key tools for improving the single market for goods and services; highlights that they will allow consumers and traders to solve their disputes without going to court in a cost- effective and simple way; encourages the Commission and Member States to raise the awareness of these important tools;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that services such as SOLVIT and SOLVIT plus represent
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Highlights the important role of the Commission's "EU Sweeps" monitoring tool specially with regards to a well- functioning digital single market;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Applauds the SOLVIT and EU Pilot projects, which are designed to avert the need for the Commission to institute infringement proceedings against Member States; considers, however, that the services offered by EU Pilot should be improved as regards the response time once alerts have been received;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Considers digital platforms such as Points of Single Contact, IMI and ISA2 important to improve the functioning of the Single Market by facilitating cross- border information exchange between authorities in Member States;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes with concern that, according to Your Europe reports, there are areas that are consistently the object of queries from
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Views a qualitative as well as quantitative assessment of implementation to be appropriate, not just the bare figures on if formally directives have been transposed or not, in order to have a full understanding of how Single Market legislation is actually working for consumers and for business;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Believes that a systematic screening of consumer markets at EU level would detect in a more timely manner emerging trends and threats to consumers and businesses; highlights in this context a positive role of all involved stakeholders, including consumer organisations;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Regrets that Parliament's access to relevant information relating to pre- infringement and infringement procedures is limited and calls for improved transparency in this regard, with due respect to confidentially rules;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that improving single market regulation should be both a priority and a shared responsibility of the Union institutions; believes that good legislation
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission to undertake infringement proceedings where evidence exists to demonstrate a failure of implementation and where reasonable efforts to solve problems through tools such as ADR, ODR, EU Pilot or SOLVIT have failed;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission to undertake timely and faster infringement proceedings where evidence exists to demonstrate a failure of implementation and where reasonable efforts to solve problems through tools such as EU Pilot or SOLVIT have failed; considers that
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission to undertake infringement proceedings where evidence exists to demonstrate a failure of implementation and where reasonable efforts to solve problems through tools such as EU Pilot or SOLVIT have failed; considers that while action should be taken in all applicable cases, the Commission could further prioritise action to tackle those infringements that are most significant in economic, social and societal terms;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission to undertake infringement proceedings where evidence exists to demonstrate a failure of implementation and where reasonable efforts to solve problems through tools such as EU Pilot or SOLVIT have failed; considers that while action should be taken in all applicable cases, the Commission could further prioritise action to tackle those infringements that are most significant in economic terms; underlines that Member States have an equal responsibility to enforce EU law, and that they should ensure an effective and efficient enforcement to protect consumers interest and to create a level playing field for businesses throughout Europe;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Undertakes to
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25 a. Stresses that in its resolution on the implementation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC, the European Parliament called on the Commission to compile and analyse data on penalties applied by Member States as well as on the efficiency of enforcement regimes in particular with regard to the complexity and length of enforcement procedures; calls repeatedly on the Commission to provide the Parliament with results of these analyses;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25 b. Considers that the enforcement remains primarily national whilst an increasing share of businesses operate across borders; stresses that cross-border situations that can affect consumer in several, if not all, Members States at the same time, are arising in the Single Market; believes that in case of an EU- wide infringement, the direct enforcement action at EU level is needed in order to ensure coherent enforcement of consumer rights throughout the EU;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25 c. Notes that cooperation between enforcement authorities is essential to ensure that consumer rights legislation is equally applied cross the internal market and to create a level playing field for businesses; stresses the importance of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) in this area; stresses that following Article 21a of the CPC Regulation, the Commission shall assess the effectiveness and operational mechanisms of this Regulation and submit report to the EP by 31 December 2014; urges the Commission to fulfil this commitment as soon as possible;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 d (new) 25d. Acknowledges a positive role of the EU sweeps actions, launched by the Commission in order to enhance enforcement throughout coordinated control actions in the online environment; believes that EU sweeps could be broaden also into the offline sector;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes the regular review period, and the introduction of sectoral analysis under the REFIT programme, both of which have the aim of improving single market regulation and ensuring that legislation is "fit for purpose";
source: 557.282
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2015-07-24Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
2015-05-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
2 Internal market, SLIMNew
2 Internal market, single market |
2015-05-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
other/0 |
|
2015-05-07Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
IMCO/8/03048
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2015-05-05Show (5) Changes
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|