2015/2100(INI) | [ParlTrack]

Changes: 2021/12/18events, docs.docs.url, events.docs.url, procedure.geographical_area, events.type, 2020/01/19docs.body, committees, events.docs.url, 2019/07/12committees, docs, 2019/07/06events, procedure.dossier_of_the_committee, activities, procedure.subject, docs, links, other, procedure.legal_basis, commission, procedure.type, procedure.summary, 2015/10/21procedure.stage_reached, activities.docs, activities.type, 2015/07/24activities, activities.type, 2015/07/16activities.docs.text, 2015/07/04activities.date, activities, activities.type, 2015/06/27activities.date, activities, activities.type, 2015/06/25activities.date, activities.docs, 2015/06/23activities, procedure.stage_reached, 2015/06/21activities.committees, activities.type, 2015/06/14activities.date, 2015/06/11activities.date

View current state | View Changes for this date

General Activities Documents Amendments (6) History

2015/2100(INI) Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the EU/Cape Verde Fisheries Partnership Agreement
Next event: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2015/06/17 more...

Role	Committee	Rapporteur	Shadows
Lead	PECH	VAN DALEN Peter (ECR)

Lead committee dossier: PECH/8/03414
Legal Basis RoP 099-p1

Subjects

3.15.15.02 Fisheries agreements with African countries

Links

Activites

2015/07/07 Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
2015/06/17 Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

Amendments	Dossier
6	2015/2100(INI) 2015/05/26 PECH 6 amendments... Amendment 1 # José BLANCO LÓPEZ Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. Whereas both parties committed to fully respect all recommendations made by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Amendment 2 # José BLANCO LÓPEZ Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. Whereas both the ICCAT and the STECF defined shark species as a healthy stock, as corroborated by the scientific meeting of both parties of this Protocol, Amendment 3 # José BLANCO LÓPEZ Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Welcomes this new fisheries protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde, adopted accordingly to the sustainability measures of the new CFP both from the environmental and the socieconomical point of view; Amendment 4 # Carlos ITURGAIZ, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ, Gabriel MATO, Francisco José MILLÁN MON Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. ~~Stresses its concern about the current high level of shark by-catch as a consequence of fisheries in these water~~Notes that some shark species (particularly blue shark and shortfin mako, which represent 99% of total catches) included in Annex 1 to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea are main species targeted by the EU surface long liner fleet and that the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS) of ICCAT considers that they are exploited within safe biological limits; calls on the Commission to report to Parliament on the actions taken by the Joint Committee in response to the ~~critical~~ science- based study to be carried out as described in Article 4, paragraph 6 of the Annex to the Protocol, in order to have guarantees that this fishery is exploited in a sustainable and responsible way; stresses that~~, in addition,~~ Parliament ~~must~~should also be informed ofabout the data o~~n shark by-catch figures, in an attempt to ensure that shark by-catch is kept to an absolute minimum~~btained as regards shark stocks; Amendment 5 # Linnéa ENGSTRÖM Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses its concern about the current high level of shark by-catch as a consequence of fisheries in these waters, given the concern expressed by the evaluation of the previous protocol over the vulnerability of certain shark species to over-exploitation; calls on the Commission to report to Parliament on the actions taken by the Joint Committee in response to the critical science-based study to be carried out as described in Article 4, paragraph 6 of the Annex to the Protocol; stresses that, in addition, Parliament ~~must~~shall be informed of the data on shark by-catch figures, in an attempt to ensure that shark by-catch is kept to an absolute minimum; Amendment 6 # Linnéa ENGSTRÖM Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Requests that the Commission evaluate each year whether the vessels operating under the provisions of this protocol have complied with the relevant reporting requirements; considers that, where this is not the case, the Commission should withhold their requests for fishing licences for the following year; source: 557.177

Amendments

Dossier

6

2015/2100(INI)

2015/05/26 PECH 6 amendments...

Amendment 1 #

José BLANCO LÓPEZ

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)

Ba. Whereas both parties committed to fully respect all recommendations made by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT),

Amendment 2 #

José BLANCO LÓPEZ

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)

Bb. Whereas both the ICCAT and the STECF defined shark species as a healthy stock, as corroborated by the scientific meeting of both parties of this Protocol,

Amendment 3 #

José BLANCO LÓPEZ

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)

-1. Welcomes this new fisheries protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde, adopted accordingly to the sustainability measures of the new CFP both from the environmental and the socieconomical point of view;

Amendment 4 #

Carlos ITURGAIZ, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ, Gabriel MATO, Francisco José MILLÁN MON

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3

3. ~~Stresses its concern about the current high level of shark by-catch as a consequence of fisheries in these water~~Notes that some shark species (particularly blue shark and shortfin mako, which represent 99% of total catches) included in Annex 1 to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea are main species targeted by the EU surface long liner fleet and that the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS) of ICCAT considers that they are exploited within safe biological limits; calls on the Commission to report to Parliament on the actions taken by the Joint Committee in response to the ~~critical~~ science- based study to be carried out as described in Article 4, paragraph 6 of the Annex to the Protocol, in order to have guarantees that this fishery is exploited in a sustainable and responsible way; stresses that~~, in addition,~~ Parliament ~~must~~should also be informed ofabout the data o~~n shark by-catch figures, in an attempt to ensure that shark by-catch is kept to an absolute minimum~~btained as regards shark stocks;

Amendment 5 #

Linnéa ENGSTRÖM

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3

3. Stresses its concern about the current high level of shark by-catch as a consequence of fisheries in these waters, given the concern expressed by the evaluation of the previous protocol over the vulnerability of certain shark species to over-exploitation; calls on the Commission to report to Parliament on the actions taken by the Joint Committee in response to the critical science-based study to be carried out as described in Article 4, paragraph 6 of the Annex to the Protocol; stresses that, in addition, Parliament ~~must~~shall be informed of the data on shark by-catch figures, in an attempt to ensure that shark by-catch is kept to an absolute minimum;

Amendment 6 #

Linnéa ENGSTRÖM

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. Requests that the Commission evaluate each year whether the vessels operating under the provisions of this protocol have complied with the relevant reporting requirements; considers that, where this is not the case, the Commission should withhold their requests for fishing licences for the following year;

source: 557.177

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2015-06-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel

activities/1/date

Old

2015-07-07T00:00:00

New

2015-09-08T00:00:00

2015-06-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel

activities/0

date: 2015-06-17T00:00:00

body: EP

type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading

2015-05-27Show (5) Changes

activities	date: 2015-07-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees	body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2015-05-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ECR name: VAN DALEN Peter
links
other	body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
procedure	dossier_of_the_committee PECH/8/03414 geographical_area Cape Verde reference 2015/2100(INI) title Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the EU/Cape Verde Fisheries Partnership Agreement legal_basis Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p1 stage_reached Awaiting committee decision summary See also type INI - Own-initiative procedure subject 3.15.15.02 Fisheries agreements with African countries

Activites

Documents

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024