BETA


2015/2105(INI) New forward-looking and innovative future strategy on trade and investment
Next event: Commission response to text adopted in plenary 2017/01/23 more...

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD) CASPARY Daniel (icon: PPE PPE), MARTIN David (icon: S&D S&D), MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR), CHARANZOVÁ Dita (icon: ALDE ALDE), SCHOLZ Helmut (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), SARGENTINI Judith (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion DEVE ZAHRADIL Jan (icon: ECR ECR) Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion AFET SAÏFI Tokia (icon: PPE PPE) Amjad BASHIR (icon: ECR ECR), Marietje SCHAAKE (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion AGRI HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther (icon: PPE PPE) José BOVÉ (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Edouard FERRAND (icon: ENF ENF), Michela GIUFFRIDA (icon: S&D S&D), James NICHOLSON (icon: ECR ECR), Jasenko SELIMOVIC (icon: ALDE ALDE), Miguel VIEGAS (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion IMCO CHARANZOVÁ Dita (icon: ALDE ALDE) Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ (icon: PPE PPE), Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO (icon: S&D S&D), Dennis de JONG (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Emma McCLARKIN (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion ITRE GRIFFIN Theresa (icon: S&D S&D) Angelika MLINAR (icon: ALDE ALDE), Rolandas PAKSAS (icon: EFDD EFDD), Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion EMPL SCHUSTER Joachim (icon: S&D S&D) Amjad BASHIR (icon: ECR ECR), Jean LAMBERT (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Patrick LE HYARIC (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/01/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/07/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/07/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 534 votes to 146, with 30 abstentions, a resolution on a new forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment.

Changing trends in global trade : Members recalled that the EU is the wealthiest economy worldwide controlling a third of world trade, and by 2020 this is projected to decrease to about 26 %. By 2050, the EU-28 will represent only 15% of the world’s GDP, down from 23.7% in 2013.

The centre of wealth generation is shifting eastwards, towards the Asia Pacific-Region with China, which has already surpassed Japan and will probably overtake the US to become the world’s largest economy in 2025. Emerging economies and developing countries are catching up with the group of industrialised countries and reaching the stage of mature economies. Moreover, the demographic development will also have a negative impact on the EU´s position in the world trade scene.

The EU’s trade and investment policy must be bolstered by:

ensuring beneficial outcomes in terms of employment and wealth creation for citizens and businesses, but also by strengthening environmental and social rights and guaranteeing the highest level of transparency, engagement and accountability; maintaining constant dialogue with businesses, consumers, social partners, all other relevant stakeholders and local and regional authorities, by setting clear guidelines in the negotiations.

Adapting faster to changes : Parliament welcomed Commission’s new strategy which focuses on elements such as responsible management of supply chains, the global digital market, trade in digital goods and services, fair and ethical trade, and the social costs of trade liberalisation.

Parliament stated that any future trade policy must fight forms of protectionism, including the reduction of unnecessary non-tariff barriers to trade, and ensure new market access, especially for SMEs. It expressed support for the Commission’s aim to enhance synergies between trade and internal market policies , and recommended that these policies award priority to measures aimed at creating jobs.

The Commission is called upon to:

regularly update its trade and investment strategy and to publicly present every two years a detailed implementation report to Parliament ; expedite its procedures so that negotiated trade agreements can be referred to Parliament within a shorter period of time , thereby allowing them to be applied provisionally or entered into force more swiftly.

Increased transparency : Parliament welcomed the Commission’s increased transparency and openness at all stages of trade negotiations, and supported the Commission’s Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership transparency initiative stating that enlarged access to classified information by Members of Parliament in the TTIP negotiations has strengthened parliamentary scrutiny. In this regard, Members called for a widening of the Commission’s transparency initiative to extend full transparency, and the possibility for public scrutiny , to all ongoing and future trade negotiations.

Moreover, the Commission is called upon to ensure a strong and balanced involvement of civil society and social partners, including through appropriate, public, online consultations and communication campaigns, in order to improve the content of the EU’s trade policy and orient it to the defence of citizen’s rights, thereby strengthening its legitimacy.

Greater coherence between the EU’s commercial objectives and other aspects of its external policy on trade for development : Parliament recalled that consistency between external policies and internal ones having an external dimension must be ensured. Parliament shared the Commission’s view that the EU has a special responsibility as regards the impact of its trade policies on developing countries and in particular on least developed countries (LDC).

Given that migration is one of the main challenges the EU is facing in the 21st century, the resolution emphasised that ensuring policy coherence of the EU’s trade and investment is fundamental in order to tackle the causes of migration. Parliament regretted that this has not been sufficiently reflected in the ‘Trade for All’ strategy.

Parliament also stressed that provisions on human rights, social and environmental standards, commitments on labour rights based on the ILO's core conventions and principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the OECD principles for multinational companies and the UN Principles on Business and Human rights, should be binding and must form a substantial part of EU trade agreements through enforceable commitments. Sustainable development chapters should be included in all EU trade and investment agreements and gender perspective should be included, horizontally, in all future trade agreements.

Members called, at the same time, for the inclusion of an effective enforcement mechanism for labour and environmental rights to which the human rights clause does not apply. Parliament also called on the Commission to establish a structured and depoliticised process whereby consultations with a partner on suspected violations of obligations under trade and sustainable development chapters must be launched according to clear criteria.

Transparent global value chains (GVCs) respecting fundamental values and standards worldwide : although the expansion of global value chains (GVCs) has created job opportunities, the weak enforcement of existing labour laws and occupational safety standards – introduced to protect workers from exhaustive working hours and unacceptable conditions – in sourcing countries remains a pressing issue (around 780 million active women and men are not earning enough to be lifted out of poverty). The resolution noted that GVCs have also propelled some supplier firms to ignore labour laws, reallocate their economic activities outside the EU, engage workers in unsafe and unacceptable conditions, demand exhaustive working hours and deny workers their fundamental rights.

The Commission is called upon to present concrete proposals to improve conditions in them in close cooperation with the ILO and the OECD with the aim of creating sustainable and equitable growth, and decent jobs , in the EU and for its partners. Moreover, better protection of entire spectrum of intellectual property rights (IPR) and more effective enforcement is of fundamental importance for further integration into GVCs.

Effective trade defence instruments (TDIs) : Parliament stressed that further trade liberalisation measures are require the EU to be able to respond even more effectively to unfair trading practices and to ensure a level playing field. It also stressed that the Union’s trade defence system needs to be modernised urgently without being weakened and pointed out that EU trade defence law must be more effective. It regretted that the TDI modernisation proposal is blocked in the Council, which has been unable to deliver on this essential piece of legislation.

Opposition to the granting of Market Economic Status (MES) to China : Members reiterated the importance of the EU’s partnership with China, in which free and fair trade and investment play an important role. They are convinced that, until China meets all five criteria required to qualify as a market economy, the EU should use a non-standard methodology in its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations of Chinese imports when determining price comparability. The Commission is called upon to make a proposal in line with this principle, and recalled the need to coordinate closely with other WTO partners on the issue.

Support for the Commission in its fight against corruption : aware that the inclusion of provisions relating to financial services in trade agreements has raised concerns regarding their potential negative effects in terms of money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance, the Commission is urged to fight against corruption as a major non-tariff barrier in developed and developing countries.

Lastly, the Commission is also called upon to:

address SMEs’ needs horizontally in all chapters of trade agreements; go even further in seeking an ambitious and more reciprocal opening up of international public procurement markets set up a unified EU customs service for a more effective application of customs rules and procedures throughout the customs territory of the EU; push strongly in all negotiations for a limitation to geoblocking practices, for a reduction in international roaming fees, and for a reinforcement of passenger rights.

Documents
2016/07/05
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/07/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/06/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tiziana BEGHIN (EFDD, IT) on a new forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment.

The report recalled that the EU is the wealthiest economy worldwide. The economic importance of the EU will decline: by 2050, the EU-28 will represent only 15% of the world’s GDP, down from 23.7% in 2013. The centre of wealth generation is shifting eastwards, towards the Asia Pacific-Region and the demographic development will also have a negative impact on the EU´s position in the world trade scene.

Doubts are being raised by EU citizens, companies and SMEs on whether large industry associations truly represent the interests of EU citizens, EU companies and generally, the European Union. Therefore, Members called for an effective, comprehensive and forward-looking trade and investment strategy.

Future trade agreements and negotiations should take into account and be consistent with the positions set out in Parliament’s resolutions on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and on the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA).

Changing trends and transparency : Members stated that any future trade policy must fight forms of protectionism, including the reduction of unnecessary non-tariff barriers to trade, and ensure new market access, especially for SMEs. Members expressed support for the Commission’s aim to enhance synergies between trade and internal market policies, and recommends that these policies award priority to measures aimed at creating jobs.

They called on the Commission to:

regularly update its trade and investment strategy and to publicly present every two years a detailed implementation report to Parliament, starting in 2017, to ensure that it delivers on its promises; expedite its procedures so that negotiated trade agreements can be referred to Parliament within a shorter period of time, thereby allowing them to be applied provisionally or entered into force more swiftly.

Members welcomed the Commission’s increased transparency and openness at all stages of trade negotiations, and supported the Commission’s Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership transparency initiative stating that enlarged access to classified information by Members of Parliament in the TTIP negotiations has strengthened parliamentary scrutiny. In this regard, Members called for a widening of the Commission’s transparency initiative to extend full transparency, and the possibility for public scrutiny , to all ongoing and future trade negotiations.

Greater coherence between the EU’s commercial objectives and other aspects of its external policy on trade for development : Members recalled that consistency between external policies and internal ones having an external dimension must be ensured. Given that migration is one of the main challenges the EU is facing in the 21st century, the report emphasised that ensuring policy coherence of the EU’s trade and investment is fundamental in order to tackle the causes of migration. Members regretted that this has not been sufficiently reflected in the ‘Trade for All’ strategy.

Members also stressed that provisions on human rights, social and environmental standards, commitments on labour rights based on the ILO's core conventions and principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the OECD principles for multinational companies and the UN Principles on Business and Human rights, should be binding and must form a substantial part of EU trade agreements through enforceable commitments. Sustainable development chapters should be included in all EU trade and investment agreements and gender perspective should be included, horizontally, in all future trade agreements.

Underlining the importance of effective safeguard mechanisms in trade agreements, Members called for a mechanism according to which Parliament is able to request that the Commission commence an investigation into violations by a third party of its obligations under an essential elements clause.

Transparent global value chains (GVCs) respecting fundamental values and standards worldwide : although the expansion of global value chains (GVCs) has created job opportunities, the weak enforcement of existing labour laws and occupational safety standards – introduced to protect workers from exhaustive working hours and unacceptable conditions – in sourcing countries remains a pressing issue. The report noted that GVCs have also propelled some supplier firms to ignore labour laws, reallocate their economic activities outside the EU and engage workers in unsafe and unacceptable conditions. The Commission is called on to study the impact of the rise of GVCs and to present concrete proposals to improve conditions in them in close cooperation with the ILO and the OECD. Better protection of entire spectrum of intellectual property rights (IPR) and more effective enforcement is of fundamental importance for further integration into GVCs according to Members.

Opposition to the granting of Market Economic Status (MES) to China : Members reiterated the importance of the EU’s partnership with China, in which free and fair trade and investment play an important role. They are convinced that, until China meets all five criteria required to qualify as a market economy, the EU should use a non-standard methodology in its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations of Chinese imports when determining price comparability. The Commission is called upon to make a proposal in line with this principle, and recalled the need to coordinate closely with other WTO partners on the issue.

Support for the Commission in its fight against corruption : aware that the inclusion of provisions relating to financial services in trade agreements has raised concerns regarding their potential negative effects in terms of money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance, the Commission is urged to fight against corruption as a major non-tariff barrier in developed and developing countries.

Lastly, the Commission is also called upon to:

address SMEs’ needs horizontally in all chapters of trade agreements; go even further in seeking an ambitious and more reciprocal opening up of international public procurement markets set up a unified EU customs service for a more effective application of customs rules and procedures throughout the customs territory of the EU; push strongly in all negotiations for a limitation to geoblocking practices, for a reduction in international roaming fees, and for a reinforcement of passenger rights.

Documents
2016/06/16
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2016/06/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/05/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/05/02
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/04/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/04/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/03/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/03/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/03/15
   EP - HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2016/02/16
   EP - BEGHIN Tiziana (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2015/11/20
   EP - SCHUSTER Joachim (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2015/11/10
   EP - CHARANZOVÁ Dita (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2015/10/21
   EP - ZAHRADIL Jan (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2015/07/22
   EP - SAÏFI Tokia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2015/06/02
   EP - GRIFFIN Theresa (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2015/05/21
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
129 2015/2105(INI)
2016/01/21 AFET 65 amendments...
source: 575.162
2016/02/22 DEVE 64 amendments...
source: 578.456

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana date: 2016-02-16T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-02-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia date: 2015-07-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-07-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: ZAHRADIL Jan date: 2015-10-21T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: SCHUSTER Joachim date: 2015-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-11-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHUSTER Joachim group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: GRIFFIN Theresa date: 2015-06-02T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2015-06-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRIFFIN Theresa group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita date: 2015-11-10T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2015-11-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/9/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0220&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0220_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0299
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0299_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2015-07-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2015-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: SCHUSTER Joachim body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2015-11-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: CASPARY Daniel group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: SARGENTINI Judith responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-16T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2015-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: GRIFFIN Theresa
  • date: 2016-06-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2015-07-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2015-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: SCHUSTER Joachim body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2015-11-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: CASPARY Daniel group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: SARGENTINI Judith responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-16T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2015-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: GRIFFIN Theresa
  • date: 2016-06-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0220&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0220/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0299 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0299/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-02-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2015-07-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-07-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: EPP name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-11-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHUSTER Joachim group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2015-11-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: SCHUSTER Joachim
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2015-06-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRIFFIN Theresa group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2015-11-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2015-11-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/5
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2016-02-16T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2015-06-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GRIFFIN Theresa
docs
  • date: 2016-03-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.219&secondRef=02 title: PE575.219 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.919 title: PE576.919 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.841&secondRef=02 title: PE560.841 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.135&secondRef=02 title: PE573.135 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.492 title: PE580.492 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.126 title: PE582.126 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.695&secondRef=02 title: PE576.695 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.819&secondRef=02 title: PE576.819 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.516&secondRef=02 title: PE580.516 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27430&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)694 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0220&language=EN title: A8-0220/2016 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tiziana BEGHIN (EFDD, IT) on a new forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment. The report recalled that the EU is the wealthiest economy worldwide. The economic importance of the EU will decline: by 2050, the EU-28 will represent only 15% of the world’s GDP, down from 23.7% in 2013. The centre of wealth generation is shifting eastwards, towards the Asia Pacific-Region and the demographic development will also have a negative impact on the EU´s position in the world trade scene. Doubts are being raised by EU citizens, companies and SMEs on whether large industry associations truly represent the interests of EU citizens, EU companies and generally, the European Union. Therefore, Members called for an effective, comprehensive and forward-looking trade and investment strategy. Future trade agreements and negotiations should take into account and be consistent with the positions set out in Parliament’s resolutions on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and on the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA). Changing trends and transparency : Members stated that any future trade policy must fight forms of protectionism, including the reduction of unnecessary non-tariff barriers to trade, and ensure new market access, especially for SMEs. Members expressed support for the Commission’s aim to enhance synergies between trade and internal market policies, and recommends that these policies award priority to measures aimed at creating jobs. They called on the Commission to: regularly update its trade and investment strategy and to publicly present every two years a detailed implementation report to Parliament, starting in 2017, to ensure that it delivers on its promises; expedite its procedures so that negotiated trade agreements can be referred to Parliament within a shorter period of time, thereby allowing them to be applied provisionally or entered into force more swiftly. Members welcomed the Commission’s increased transparency and openness at all stages of trade negotiations, and supported the Commission’s Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership transparency initiative stating that enlarged access to classified information by Members of Parliament in the TTIP negotiations has strengthened parliamentary scrutiny. In this regard, Members called for a widening of the Commission’s transparency initiative to extend full transparency, and the possibility for public scrutiny , to all ongoing and future trade negotiations. Greater coherence between the EU’s commercial objectives and other aspects of its external policy on trade for development : Members recalled that consistency between external policies and internal ones having an external dimension must be ensured. Given that migration is one of the main challenges the EU is facing in the 21st century, the report emphasised that ensuring policy coherence of the EU’s trade and investment is fundamental in order to tackle the causes of migration. Members regretted that this has not been sufficiently reflected in the ‘Trade for All’ strategy. Members also stressed that provisions on human rights, social and environmental standards, commitments on labour rights based on the ILO's core conventions and principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the OECD principles for multinational companies and the UN Principles on Business and Human rights, should be binding and must form a substantial part of EU trade agreements through enforceable commitments. Sustainable development chapters should be included in all EU trade and investment agreements and gender perspective should be included, horizontally, in all future trade agreements. Underlining the importance of effective safeguard mechanisms in trade agreements, Members called for a mechanism according to which Parliament is able to request that the Commission commence an investigation into violations by a third party of its obligations under an essential elements clause. Transparent global value chains (GVCs) respecting fundamental values and standards worldwide : although the expansion of global value chains (GVCs) has created job opportunities, the weak enforcement of existing labour laws and occupational safety standards – introduced to protect workers from exhaustive working hours and unacceptable conditions – in sourcing countries remains a pressing issue. The report noted that GVCs have also propelled some supplier firms to ignore labour laws, reallocate their economic activities outside the EU and engage workers in unsafe and unacceptable conditions. The Commission is called on to study the impact of the rise of GVCs and to present concrete proposals to improve conditions in them in close cooperation with the ILO and the OECD. Better protection of entire spectrum of intellectual property rights (IPR) and more effective enforcement is of fundamental importance for further integration into GVCs according to Members. Opposition to the granting of Market Economic Status (MES) to China : Members reiterated the importance of the EU’s partnership with China, in which free and fair trade and investment play an important role. They are convinced that, until China meets all five criteria required to qualify as a market economy, the EU should use a non-standard methodology in its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations of Chinese imports when determining price comparability. The Commission is called upon to make a proposal in line with this principle, and recalled the need to coordinate closely with other WTO partners on the issue. Support for the Commission in its fight against corruption : aware that the inclusion of provisions relating to financial services in trade agreements has raised concerns regarding their potential negative effects in terms of money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance, the Commission is urged to fight against corruption as a major non-tariff barrier in developed and developing countries. Lastly, the Commission is also called upon to: address SMEs’ needs horizontally in all chapters of trade agreements; go even further in seeking an ambitious and more reciprocal opening up of international public procurement markets set up a unified EU customs service for a more effective application of customs rules and procedures throughout the customs territory of the EU; push strongly in all negotiations for a limitation to geoblocking practices, for a reduction in international roaming fees, and for a reinforcement of passenger rights.
  • date: 2016-07-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27430&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0299 title: T8-0299/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 534 votes to 146, with 30 abstentions, a resolution on a new forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment. Changing trends in global trade : Members recalled that the EU is the wealthiest economy worldwide controlling a third of world trade, and by 2020 this is projected to decrease to about 26 %. By 2050, the EU-28 will represent only 15% of the world’s GDP, down from 23.7% in 2013. The centre of wealth generation is shifting eastwards, towards the Asia Pacific-Region with China, which has already surpassed Japan and will probably overtake the US to become the world’s largest economy in 2025. Emerging economies and developing countries are catching up with the group of industrialised countries and reaching the stage of mature economies. Moreover, the demographic development will also have a negative impact on the EU´s position in the world trade scene. The EU’s trade and investment policy must be bolstered by: ensuring beneficial outcomes in terms of employment and wealth creation for citizens and businesses, but also by strengthening environmental and social rights and guaranteeing the highest level of transparency, engagement and accountability; maintaining constant dialogue with businesses, consumers, social partners, all other relevant stakeholders and local and regional authorities, by setting clear guidelines in the negotiations. Adapting faster to changes : Parliament welcomed Commission’s new strategy which focuses on elements such as responsible management of supply chains, the global digital market, trade in digital goods and services, fair and ethical trade, and the social costs of trade liberalisation. Parliament stated that any future trade policy must fight forms of protectionism, including the reduction of unnecessary non-tariff barriers to trade, and ensure new market access, especially for SMEs. It expressed support for the Commission’s aim to enhance synergies between trade and internal market policies , and recommended that these policies award priority to measures aimed at creating jobs. The Commission is called upon to: regularly update its trade and investment strategy and to publicly present every two years a detailed implementation report to Parliament ; expedite its procedures so that negotiated trade agreements can be referred to Parliament within a shorter period of time , thereby allowing them to be applied provisionally or entered into force more swiftly. Increased transparency : Parliament welcomed the Commission’s increased transparency and openness at all stages of trade negotiations, and supported the Commission’s Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership transparency initiative stating that enlarged access to classified information by Members of Parliament in the TTIP negotiations has strengthened parliamentary scrutiny. In this regard, Members called for a widening of the Commission’s transparency initiative to extend full transparency, and the possibility for public scrutiny , to all ongoing and future trade negotiations. Moreover, the Commission is called upon to ensure a strong and balanced involvement of civil society and social partners, including through appropriate, public, online consultations and communication campaigns, in order to improve the content of the EU’s trade policy and orient it to the defence of citizen’s rights, thereby strengthening its legitimacy. Greater coherence between the EU’s commercial objectives and other aspects of its external policy on trade for development : Parliament recalled that consistency between external policies and internal ones having an external dimension must be ensured. Parliament shared the Commission’s view that the EU has a special responsibility as regards the impact of its trade policies on developing countries and in particular on least developed countries (LDC). Given that migration is one of the main challenges the EU is facing in the 21st century, the resolution emphasised that ensuring policy coherence of the EU’s trade and investment is fundamental in order to tackle the causes of migration. Parliament regretted that this has not been sufficiently reflected in the ‘Trade for All’ strategy. Parliament also stressed that provisions on human rights, social and environmental standards, commitments on labour rights based on the ILO's core conventions and principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the OECD principles for multinational companies and the UN Principles on Business and Human rights, should be binding and must form a substantial part of EU trade agreements through enforceable commitments. Sustainable development chapters should be included in all EU trade and investment agreements and gender perspective should be included, horizontally, in all future trade agreements. Members called, at the same time, for the inclusion of an effective enforcement mechanism for labour and environmental rights to which the human rights clause does not apply. Parliament also called on the Commission to establish a structured and depoliticised process whereby consultations with a partner on suspected violations of obligations under trade and sustainable development chapters must be launched according to clear criteria. Transparent global value chains (GVCs) respecting fundamental values and standards worldwide : although the expansion of global value chains (GVCs) has created job opportunities, the weak enforcement of existing labour laws and occupational safety standards – introduced to protect workers from exhaustive working hours and unacceptable conditions – in sourcing countries remains a pressing issue (around 780 million active women and men are not earning enough to be lifted out of poverty). The resolution noted that GVCs have also propelled some supplier firms to ignore labour laws, reallocate their economic activities outside the EU, engage workers in unsafe and unacceptable conditions, demand exhaustive working hours and deny workers their fundamental rights. The Commission is called upon to present concrete proposals to improve conditions in them in close cooperation with the ILO and the OECD with the aim of creating sustainable and equitable growth, and decent jobs , in the EU and for its partners. Moreover, better protection of entire spectrum of intellectual property rights (IPR) and more effective enforcement is of fundamental importance for further integration into GVCs. Effective trade defence instruments (TDIs) : Parliament stressed that further trade liberalisation measures are require the EU to be able to respond even more effectively to unfair trading practices and to ensure a level playing field. It also stressed that the Union’s trade defence system needs to be modernised urgently without being weakened and pointed out that EU trade defence law must be more effective. It regretted that the TDI modernisation proposal is blocked in the Council, which has been unable to deliver on this essential piece of legislation. Opposition to the granting of Market Economic Status (MES) to China : Members reiterated the importance of the EU’s partnership with China, in which free and fair trade and investment play an important role. They are convinced that, until China meets all five criteria required to qualify as a market economy, the EU should use a non-standard methodology in its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations of Chinese imports when determining price comparability. The Commission is called upon to make a proposal in line with this principle, and recalled the need to coordinate closely with other WTO partners on the issue. Support for the Commission in its fight against corruption : aware that the inclusion of provisions relating to financial services in trade agreements has raised concerns regarding their potential negative effects in terms of money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance, the Commission is urged to fight against corruption as a major non-tariff barrier in developed and developing countries. Lastly, the Commission is also called upon to: address SMEs’ needs horizontally in all chapters of trade agreements; go even further in seeking an ambitious and more reciprocal opening up of international public procurement markets set up a unified EU customs service for a more effective application of customs rules and procedures throughout the customs territory of the EU; push strongly in all negotiations for a limitation to geoblocking practices, for a reduction in international roaming fees, and for a reinforcement of passenger rights.
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/8/02651
New
  • INTA/8/02651
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
  • 6.20.06 Foreign direct investment (FDI)
New
6.20
Common commercial policy in general
6.20.06
Foreign direct investment (FDI)
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0299 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0299/2016
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tiziana BEGHIN (EFDD, IT) on a new forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment.

    The report recalled that the EU is the wealthiest economy worldwide. The economic importance of the EU will decline: by 2050, the EU-28 will represent only 15% of the world’s GDP, down from 23.7% in 2013. The centre of wealth generation is shifting eastwards, towards the Asia Pacific-Region and the demographic development will also have a negative impact on the EU´s position in the world trade scene.  

    Doubts are being raised by EU citizens, companies and SMEs on whether large industry associations truly represent the interests of EU citizens, EU companies and generally, the European Union. Therefore, Members called for an effective, comprehensive and forward-looking trade and investment strategy.

    Future trade agreements and negotiations should take into account and be consistent with the positions set out in Parliament’s resolutions on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and on the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA).

    Changing trends and transparency: Members stated that any future trade policy must fight forms of protectionism, including the reduction of unnecessary non-tariff barriers to trade, and ensure new market access, especially for SMEs. Members expressed support for the Commission’s aim to enhance synergies between trade and internal market policies, and recommends that these policies award priority to measures aimed at creating jobs.

    They called on the Commission to:

    • regularly update its trade and investment strategy and to publicly present every two years a detailed implementation report to Parliament, starting in 2017, to ensure that it delivers on its promises;
    • expedite its procedures so that negotiated trade agreements can be referred to Parliament within a shorter period of time, thereby allowing them to  be applied provisionally or entered into force more swiftly.

    Members welcomed the Commission’s increased transparency and openness at all stages of trade negotiations, and supported the Commission’s Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership transparency initiative stating that enlarged access to classified information by Members of Parliament in the TTIP negotiations has strengthened parliamentary scrutiny. In this regard, Members called for a widening of the Commission’s transparency initiative to extend full transparency, and the possibility for public scrutiny, to all ongoing and future trade negotiations.

    Greater coherence between the EU’s commercial objectives and other aspects of its external policy on trade for development: Members recalled that consistency between external policies and internal ones having an external dimension must be ensured. Given that migration is one of the main challenges the EU is facing in the 21st century, the report emphasised that ensuring policy coherence of the EU’s trade and investment is fundamental in order to tackle the causes of migration. Members regretted that this has not been sufficiently reflected in the ‘Trade for All’ strategy.

    Members also stressed that provisions on human rights, social and environmental standards, commitments on labour rights based on the ILO's core conventions and principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the OECD principles for multinational companies and the UN Principles on Business and Human rights, should be binding and must form a substantial part of EU trade agreements through enforceable commitments. Sustainable development chapters should be included in all EU trade and investment agreements and gender perspective should be included, horizontally, in all future trade agreements.

    Underlining the importance of effective safeguard mechanisms in trade agreements, Members called for a mechanism according to which Parliament is able to request that the Commission commence an investigation into violations by a third party of its obligations under an essential elements clause.

    Transparent global value chains (GVCs) respecting fundamental values and standards worldwide: although the expansion of global value chains (GVCs) has created job opportunities, the weak enforcement of existing labour laws and occupational safety standards – introduced to protect workers from exhaustive working hours and unacceptable conditions – in sourcing countries remains a pressing issue. The report noted that GVCs have also propelled some supplier firms to ignore labour laws, reallocate their economic activities outside the EU and engage workers in unsafe and unacceptable conditions. The Commission is called on to study the impact of the rise of GVCs and to present concrete proposals to improve conditions in them in close cooperation with the ILO and the OECD. Better protection of entire spectrum of intellectual property rights (IPR) and more effective enforcement is of fundamental importance for further integration into GVCs according to Members.

    Opposition to the granting of Market Economic Status (MES) to China: Members reiterated the importance of the EU’s partnership with China, in which free and fair trade and investment play an important role. They are convinced that, until China meets all five criteria required to qualify as a market economy, the EU should use a non-standard methodology in its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations of Chinese imports when determining price comparability. The Commission is called upon to make a proposal in line with this principle, and recalled the need to coordinate closely with other WTO partners on the issue.

    Support for the Commission in its fight against corruption: aware that the inclusion of provisions relating to financial services in trade agreements has raised concerns regarding their potential negative effects in terms of money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance, the Commission is urged to fight against corruption as a major non-tariff barrier in developed and developing countries.

    Lastly, the Commission is also called upon to:

    • address SMEs’ needs horizontally in all chapters of trade agreements;
    • go even further in seeking an ambitious and more reciprocal opening up of international public procurement markets
    • set up a unified EU customs service for a more effective application of customs rules and procedures throughout the customs territory of the EU;
    • push strongly in all negotiations for a limitation to geoblocking practices, for a reduction in international roaming fees, and for a reinforcement of passenger rights.
activities/2
date
2016-06-28T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0220&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0220/2016
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2016-07-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/1
date
2016-06-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/1
date
2016-06-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/date
Old
2016-09-12T00:00:00
New
2016-07-04T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/5/shadows/5/mepref
Old
4f1ac941b819f25efd000123
New
4f1adb09b819f207b30000a3
activities/0/committees/5/shadows/5/name
Old
JADOT Yannick
New
SARGENTINI Judith
committees/5/shadows/5/mepref
Old
4f1ac941b819f25efd000123
New
4f1adb09b819f207b30000a3
committees/5/shadows/5/name
Old
JADOT Yannick
New
SARGENTINI Judith
activities/0/committees/5/shadows/4
group
GUE/NGL
name
SCHOLZ Helmut
committees/5/shadows/4
group
GUE/NGL
name
SCHOLZ Helmut
activities/0/committees/1/date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther
committees/1/date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther
activities/0/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
activities/2/date
Old
2016-07-04T00:00:00
New
2016-09-12T00:00:00
other/0/commissioner
Old
MIMICA Neven
New
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
other/0/dg/title
Old
International Cooperation and Development
New
Trade
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/
activities/0/committees/4/date
2016-02-16T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
activities/0/committees/4/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
JADOT Yannick
committees/4/date
2016-02-16T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
committees/4/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
JADOT Yannick
activities/1/date
Old
2016-05-24T00:00:00
New
2016-06-16T00:00:00
activities/2/date
Old
2016-06-22T00:00:00
New
2016-07-04T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/3/date
2015-11-10T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
committees/3/date
2015-11-10T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
activities/0/committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
activities/0/committees/2/date
2015-11-20T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SCHUSTER Joachim
committees/2/date
2015-11-20T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SCHUSTER Joachim
activities/0/committees/1/date
2015-10-21T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan
committees/1/date
2015-10-21T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan
activities/0/committees/3/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASPARY Daniel
  • group: S&D name: MARTIN David
  • group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
activities/1
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2016-06-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/3/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASPARY Daniel
  • group: S&D name: MARTIN David
  • group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
activities/0/committees/0/date
2015-07-22T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
committees/0/date
2015-07-22T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MIMICA Neven
activities/0/committees/4/date
2015-06-02T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: GRIFFIN Theresa
committees/4/date
2015-06-02T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: GRIFFIN Theresa
activities/0/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    INTA/8/02651
    reference
    2015/2105(INI)
    title
    New forward-looking and innovative future strategy on trade and investment
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Awaiting committee decision
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject