Awaiting committee decision
2015/2110(INI) Fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM committee resolution
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2016/09/12
Lead committee dossier: LIBE/8/03484
Legal Basis RoP 052
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2016/09/12
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | CONT | PITERA Julia (EPP) | |
Opinion | DEVE | CORRAO Ignazio (EFD) | |
Lead | LIBE | FERRARA Laura (EFD) | MELO Nuno (EPP), IOTOVA Iliana (S&D), VISTISEN Anders Primdahl (ECR), GRIESBECK Nathalie (ALDE), DE JONG Dennis (GUE/NGL), JOLY Eva (Verts/ALE) |
Legal Basis RoP 052
Subjects
Activites
-
2016/09/12
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
-
2015/05/21
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
Amendments | Dossier |
89 |
2015/2110(INI)
2016/03/04
CONT
46 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 a (new) – having regard to the proposed Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law /* COM/2012/0363 final - 2012/0193 (COD) */,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) Calls for the adoption of a common definition of organized crime at the European level as an essential step for enhancing the fight against this phenomenon;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Is concerned about the increasing professionalisation of people smuggling and the related increase in profits for smuggling and trafficking networks as a result of the continuing flows of refugees to Europe; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that progress is made on international cooperation to combat trafficking in order to eradicate people smuggling and minimise the influence of trafficking networks;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out that Greece received around EUR 655 million in 2015 from national programmes and the emergency support system for the refugee crisis; calls on the Commission to ensure that proper use was made of these funds and to inform Parliament of its findings;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the Commission has proposed a vast array of measures to combat these crimes and that some results are already available (i.e. automatic information exchange, anti-money laundering directive); regrets, however, that there is still no instrument for the exchange of information regarding accounting entries between two or more Member States in order to prevent transnational fraud in respect of the Structural and Investment Funds, and calls on the Commission to draft such a proposal as soon as possible;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the Commission has proposed a vast array of measures to combat these crimes and that some results are already available (i.e. automatic information exchange, anti-money laundering directive); and considers essential to promote common investigative techniques to contrast organized crime and to establish specific national structures to this end, developing, an operational network for the exchange of information in coordination with Europol;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the Commission has proposed a vast array of measures to combat these crimes
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is concerned about the increase in VAT-related fraud, in particular so-called carousel fraud; calls on all Member States to participate in all of EUROFISC’s fields of activity so as to facilitate the exchange of information to help combat this kind of fraud;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights in this regard th
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights in this regard that it is urgent that the Parliament and the Council put an end to the current deadlock and find an agreement on the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (PIF Directive) with VAT included in its scope;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas in 2014, 1 649 irregularities were reported as being fraudulent and affecting the European budget to the tune of EUR 538.2 million, relating to both the expenditure side and the revenue side, but there are no official data on what percentage of fraud is attributable to organised crime;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights in this regard that it is urgent that the Parliament and the Council find an agreement on the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (PIF Directive)
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – point 1 (new) (1) Welcomes the communication of 24 February 2016 in which the Commission commits to proposing an action plan for reforming the VAT system; calls on the Commission to include provisions on the fight against cross-border VAT fraud; notes that, according to Commission estimates, the EU loses about EUR 50 billion every year as a result of cross-border VAT fraud;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the on-going discussions in the Council on the draft regulation establishing the European public prosecutor’s office (EPPO) as an essential piece of the action plan; stresses that the European public prosecutor’s office should have extensive powers for the purpose of combating crimes against the EU’s financial interests; calls on the Member States to make sufficient resources available for the creation of the European public prosecutor’s office;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the on-going discussions in the Council on the draft regulation establishing the European public prosecutor’s office (EPPO)
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the on-going discussions in the Council on the draft regulation establishing the European public prosecutor’s office (EPPO) as an essential piece of the action plan and recognizes that the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor Office, provided with the necessary human and financial resources, is essential for an effective action against frauds to financial interests of the European Union;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – point 1 (new) (1) Welcomes the fact that in December 2014, after four years of discussion, Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted an agreement on EU data protection reforms which will strengthen data protection for natural persons and promote cooperation between the Member State law enforcement bodies;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that EUR 1 trillion is lost to tax evasion and avoidance every year in the EU. Stresses that special attention should be given to tax havens and countries that pursue non-transparent or harmful tax prices, which represents a huge problem affecting each and every European citizen; Welcomes the international agreement
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the international agreement within the G20 to apply a new global standard for greater tax transparency, in line with the high standard already applied by the EU; asks for its rapid implementation and effective monitoring of tax fraud and evasion at international level;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that transparency is the most effective instrument for combating abuse and fraud; calls on the Commission to improve legislation in this regard, making it compulsory to publish data relating to all the beneficiaries of EU funding, including data on subcontracts;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas organised crime, corruption and money laundering pose serious threats to the EU economy by significantly affecting tax revenues of Member States and the EU as a whole, and to the accountability of public EU funded projects as criminal organisations are operating in various sectors, many of which are subject to governmental control;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that a common method for seizing criminal group’s assets in the EU could be a dissuasive measure for criminals; invites the Member States competent authorities to share best practices in this area within the existing meetings platforms, such as the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Fraud Prevention (COCOLAF) and others; calls Member States to swiftly transpose the directive on the confiscation of assets from crime and to promote the re-use of confiscated assets for social purposes, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that a common method for seizing criminal group’s assets in the EU
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 – indent 1 (new) – Invites Member States to develop administrative, police and judicial cooperation to trace the criminal assets throughout the Union for seizure and confiscation relying on the improvement of Assets Recovery of Offices, which should be provided with adequate resources.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 – point 1 (new) (1) Calls on the Member States to create specialised structures at national level to detect criminal organisations and exclude from Member State public tenders entities that are implicated in corrupt practices or money laundering;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that organised crime uses construction companies that specialise in earth moving to launder money and illegally dispose of toxic substances that cause environmental pollution; calls on the Commission, in order to prevent such practices, to carry out anti-crime inspections on contractors and subcontractors who are beneficiaries of contracts for major infrastructure projects financed by the EU budget;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Is concerned about the recurring practice of criminal companies involved in money laundering submitting below- cost bids in tender procedures for major projects; calls on the Commission to include an economic assessment of proposals in respect of companies that are awarded contracts and subcontractors;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Is concerned that 71.15 % of the expenditure for visitors’ groups in 2014 was paid in cash; notes the study produced by the Court of Auditors, in which it drew attention to the ‘high risk’ practice of making cash payments for the reimbursement of costs for visitors’ groups; demands that all cash payments for visitors’ groups be abolished;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Highlights the vital role of banks with regard to money laundering and, in this regard, calls on the Commission to draw up a proposal in order to ensure full transparency of bank flows not only for individuals, but also for legal entities and trusts;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls for banking licences to be withdrawn from banks involved in proven cases in which large amounts of money have been laundered;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for the EU to apply for membership for the Council of Europe Group of States against Corruption (GRECO)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas protection of the financial interests of the EU should guarantee that budget revenue and expenditure contribute towards the achievement of the EU's priorities and objectives and towards increasing the confidence of citizens by assuring them that their money is being used in full compliance with the aims and policies of the EU;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Points out that the EU institutions as of January 2014 have the obligation to introduce internal whistleblowing rules to protect whistleblowers against retaliation, to make sure that serious misconduct or wrongdoing in the EU administration is brought to light; regrets that some of the institutions have not yet implemented those rules; nonetheless encourages the EU Member States to set up a European protection programme for whistle-blowers and State witnesses including those testify against mafia-type and other criminal organisations;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Points out that programs such as Hercule, Fiscalis, Pericles and Directive
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Is concerned about the lack of any specific national legislation against organised crime in many Northern European countries; is aware that such a shortcoming offers a great opportunity for organised crime in relation to the trade in illegal products passing through the ports of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea; calls on the Commission to continue promoting exchanges of information and best practice between Member States in order to combat the entry of illegal goods into the EU;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Is concerned about the decline in resources made available by Member States to combat the illicit tobacco trade; calls on the Commission, when signing new agreements with the tobacco industry, to stipulate that the share of the proceeds from those agreements for the Member States should be tied, in their budgets, to measures to combat the smuggling of illicit tobacco products;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the 18-month programme of the EU Council for the Dutch, Slovak and Maltese Presidencies, wh
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the 18-month programme of the EU Council for the Dutch, Slovak and Maltese Presidencies, where a comprehensive and integrated approach to
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 – point 1 (new) (1) Stresses the importance of having more accountable politics. Calls for mandatory rules establishing that persons who have been convicted by final judgement or participation in organised crime, money laundering, corruption or other serious offences, should not be eligible for memberships of the European Parliament or service for other EU institutions and bodies;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the diversity of legal and administrative systems in the Member States presents a challenging environment in which to overcome organised crime and combat money laundering;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas in order to enhance the existing measures such as the Convention on the Protection of the Communities' Financial Interests (PIF Convention) for fighting fraud, corruption, money laundering and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, the Commission has submitted two proposals for criminal law instruments, the PIF Directive and the Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO Regulation), aimed at ensuring more effective investigation and better protection of the taxpayers' money throughout the European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas the fight against fraud, corruption and money laundering and recovery of money from crime in the Union must be a priority for political action by the Community institutions, and police and judicial cooperation between Member States is therefore crucial;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas the ability of criminal organizations to adapt their action to different territorial and social contexts, allows them to diversify their activities by realizing significant profits from drug trafficking, human trafficking, waste trafficking and illegal immigration, and to infiltrate in legal markets relying on a "grey zone" of collusion with white collars and corrupted civil servants;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the phenomena of organised crime, corruption and money laundering usually have a cross-border dimension that requires close cooperation b
source: 578.512
2016/04/07
DEVE
43 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that corruption impacts negatively the achievement of SDGs both directly and indirectly; by increasing project costs for both the private and public sectors; damaging public institutions; reducing citizens' trust in their government and increasing social inequality;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Recalls that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development recognises the need to fight corruption in all its forms, calling on States to reduce illicit financial flows, bribery and corruption and to build effective, accountable and transparent institutions;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy for corruption risk management in developing countries and to implement fully the anti-fraud strategy issued in 2013, especially when implementing EU aid in all its modalities, including the EDF and trust funds, and when delegating development projects to third parties;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Calls on the EU to support the establishment of strong national systems and institutions to address corruption in developing countries, including central and local government systems, tax authorities, law enforcement agencies, but also NGOs, media and parliaments; stresses that budget support to developing countries should be accompanied by a clear strategy to minimise corruption risks;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the EU to further support the c
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the EU to support the creation and strengthening of regional and specialised police and judicial networks in
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the EU to support the creation and strengthening of regional and specialised police and judicial networks in developing countries, and to share the best practices and know-how of Europol,
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that corruption has disastrous impacts on development when funds that should be devoted to education, health and other vital public services are instead diverted into the hands of corrupt elites; takes into account that corruption also exacerbates violence and insecurity and can lead to dissatisfaction with public institutions, decreased legitimacy of the government in the eyes of the citizens, and eventually cause spirals of anger and unrest;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that corruption not only affects economic capacities and infrastructures in developing countries, it also hinders development efforts and increases inequalities, with a greater impact on the most vulnerable populations; insists on the need systematically to integrate anti-corruption measures into development policies and as part of the EU's relations with third countries;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Recalls that the fight against all forms of organised crimes, including corruption, illicit financial flows and stolen assets is now embodied in Sustainable Development Goal 16; calls on the EU to monitor closely and track progress in this regard; considers that in order to achieve this target, EU action should further focus on supporting good governance and institution-building in developing and fragile countries;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Recalls that among the institutions most affected by corruption are the judiciary and police; notes that corruption, bribery, theft and tax evasion cost some US $1.26 trillion for developing countries per year and that these resources could be used to lift those who are living on less than $1.25 a day above $1.25 for at least six years;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that organised crime has a transnational dimension; highlights the need for a joint action based on accessible information and increased cooperation between the police and the judicial authorities of various Member States and
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Emphasises the importance of prioritising the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16 of Agenda 2030 which seeks substantially to reduce corruption, as well as to promote access to justice and effective, accountable and transparent institutions; urges the EU to make SDG 16 a priority in development programming;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that whistleblowing is an essential anti-corruption tool, and that a proper system to protect whistleblowers should be established both inside and outside the EU; stresses in particular a direct reporting mechanisms is needed for citizens in EU aid recipient countries who bring attention to irregularities in EU- funded aid programmes;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to ensure through constant monitoring that EU aid does not directly or indirectly contribute to corruption; believes that development aid, and in particular budget support, should be subject to more conditionality to ensure developing countries' political commitment to undertake sectorial reforms and promote anti-corruption measures;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes with concern that the EU approach towards corruption in ACP countries provides little strategic guidance on strengthening country systems to prevent and control it;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses concern regarding the links between multinational corporations and organized crime in third countries to intimidate, blackmail, and even murder human rights defenders, social leaders, and unionists; calls on the EU to investigate the activities of multinational corporations acting with European capital and strengthen the control and monitoring of the activities of these multinational corporations;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the EU to develop a strong holistic risk management system to prevent development aid from contributing to corruption in recipient countries; in particular, calls on the EU to address corruption directly through programming and country strategy papers and to link budget support to clear anti- corruption objectives; to this end, stresses the need to set up robust mechanisms to monitor its implementation;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Recalls the importance of coherence between the EU's internal and external policies and points at the need to integrate the fight against organised crime in development and security strategies as a means to restore stability in developing countries;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Deems that companies should be required to have an anti-corruption management system in place, including adequate alert mechanisms throughout the supply chain, to be selected for projects which receive EU funds;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Deems that more coordination is needed between EEAS and DEVCO in their approach to effectively curbing corruption in developing countries; takes the view that aid assistance should be more aligned to the absorptive capacity of the host country and its general development needs to avoid massive waste and corruption of aid resources;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that organised crime frequently has a transnational dimension;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that people’s right to decide on their own food and agriculture systems is the solution to combating criminal activities that cause hunger and poverty; urges the international community to actively confront financial speculation on foodstuffs, such as purchases at low prices in vast agricultural areas and land grabbing by large multinational agro companies, taking into consideration the detrimental impact on small producers; encourages the organisation of short supply chains between local producers and consumers in order to promote regional agriculture which is more sustainable and profitable from the point of view of land use, plant protection products and the local economy;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of the principle of universal justice to fight against organised crime; rejects the limitations that the Governments of Member States have imposed on it, seriously severing the capacity of judges to investigate crimes committed outside the territory of their Member State; urges the EU to defend the inclusion of economic, financial, and environmental crimes under universal jurisdiction;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that corruption is closely related to activities such as money laundering, tax evasion, and illicit trade; in this light, stresses that transparency should be the cornerstone of all anti- corruption strategies and include: lifting excessive professional secrecy; automatic exchange of information on tax matters; public country-by-country reporting of multinationals and public registries of beneficial owners of companies;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Urges the EU to show strong political will and determination against tax avoidance and evasion, in line with the principle of Policy Coherence for Development, as enshrined in article 208 of the Lisbon Treaty; recalls the EU's responsibility to combat tax rules that facilitate tax dodging by transnational corporations and individuals and to help third countries to repatriate illicit funds and prosecute perpetrators;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Stresses the need to undertake an analysis of the impact of the tax systems of EU Members States on developing countries to combat effectively illicit financial flows;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that organised crime has a transnational dimension and encompasses a various range of criminal activities including drug trafficking, smuggling of migrants, money-laundering, trafficking in counterfeit goods, firearms, wildlife and cultural property; highlights the need for a joint action based on accessible information and increased cooperation between the police and the judicial authorities of various Member States and developing countries, which should be assisted by ad hoc joint coordination bodies;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Highlights that double taxation agreement (DTAs) can enable illicit financial flows (IFFs); urges the EU to ensure a fair distribution of taxing rights while negotiating tax and investment treaties with developing countries; to this end, calls on the EU to negotiate Tax Treaties with developing countries based on the model treaty of the United Nations Tax Committee, which gives stronger rights to taxation at source;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 e (new) 5e. Notes that extractive industries, utilities and infrastructure, health and education are particularly vulnerable to corruption; recalls in particular that non- transparent government procurement and supply chains can provide opportunities for corruption-related IFFs; accordingly, deems that anti-corruption efforts should also aim at modernising procurement practices;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 f (new) 5f. Calls on developing countries to increase transparency and accountability in resource contracts, companies' financial reporting and auditing as well as revenue collection and allocation as part of their anti-corruption agenda;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 g (new) 5g. Calls on the EU to upgrade its support to help resource-rich countries to implement the EITI principles of greater transparency and accountability in the oil, gas and mining sectors; believes that the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) should be made mandatory and extended: they should not focus only on governments but also on producing firms and commodity trading companies;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the costs of corruption cannot only be calculated in economic terms, and that these costs are very high, especially in developing countries, which undermines public trust in public authorities and democratic institutions, increases inequalities that disproportionately affect the poorest and most vulnerable, and reduces the effectiveness of development aid;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Highlights that ending tax havens and bank secrecy is indispensable and essential to fight effectively against corruption and organised crime; urges the EU to cancel any economic or commercial agreement with states that are considered to be tax havens by at least one of the Member States of the EU; stresses that the EU must promote the fight against tax havens, banking secrecy and money laundering as a priority in all relevant international fora;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to address both the supply and demand sides of corruption; encourages developing countries to prioritise anti-corruption measures in their development agendas, i.e. through setting up independent and competent regulatory and law enforcement systems;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls that illicit financial flows, estimated at $1 trillion a year, are major obstacles to the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development, and drain resources that should be invested in developing countries;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the EU to take a more active role in providing financial and technical assistance to developing countries to cope with emerging global standards for fighting tax evasion, including automatic exchange of information;
source: 580.446
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2016-06-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-09-12T00:00:00New
2016-10-03T00:00:00 |
2016-04-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-07-05T00:00:00New
2016-09-12T00:00:00 |
2016-04-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1 |
|
2015-11-27Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4f608bacb819f2787f000000New
53b2dec1b819f205b00000fb |
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
SARVAMAA PetriNew
PITERA Julia |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4f608bacb819f2787f000000New
53b2dec1b819f205b00000fb |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
SARVAMAA PetriNew
PITERA Julia |
2015-11-26Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/4 |
|
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/4 |
|
committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
2015-11-19Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/0/date |
Old
2015-05-19T00:00:00New
2015-11-18T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4f1ad952b819f207b300000eNew
4f608bacb819f2787f000000 |
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MACOVEI MonicaNew
SARVAMAA Petri |
committees/0/date |
Old
2015-05-19T00:00:00New
2015-11-18T00:00:00 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4f1ad952b819f207b300000eNew
4f608bacb819f2787f000000 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MACOVEI MonicaNew
SARVAMAA Petri |
2015-10-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/2/shadows |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
2015-06-15Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2015-06-10T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2015-06-10T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2015-06-11Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/2/date |
2015-05-06T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2015-05-06T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
2015-06-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
other/0 |
|
2015-06-02Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
2015-05-27Show (5) Changes
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|