BETA


2015/2118(INI) Implementation of the Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM BEARDER Catherine (icon: ALDE ALDE) CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria (icon: PPE PPE), HONEYBALL Mary (icon: S&D S&D), GERICKE Arne (icon: ECR ECR), URTASUN Ernest (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion LIBE Mariya GABRIEL (icon: PPE PPE), Anna HEDH (icon: S&D S&D), Bodil VALERO (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Kristina WINBERG (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/09/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/05/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/05/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 391 votes to 43, with 53 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of the Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective.

To recall, trafficking in human beings (THB) is a violation of fundamental human rights under Article 5 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as a violation of the victim’s personal integrity and a serious organised crime that undermines the state and the rule of law. It has been addressed at many levels of governance, most notably in the EU with Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, which established a legal framework to better enable criminal prosecutions against traffickers.

The current refugee crisis has shown up the lack of proper tools at a European level for jointly combating THB, especially when its aim is the sexual exploitation of women and children.

Parliament noted that women and girls make up 80 % of registered victims of THB and children make up approximately 16 % of registered victims. 70 % of the identified victims of THB and 70 % of suspected traffickers in the EU are EU nationals.

THB is a complex transnational phenomenon that can be tackled effectively only if the EU institutions and Member States work together in a coordinated manner in order to prevent ‘forum shopping’ by criminal groups and individuals.

Addressing the gender dimension of THB in the implementation of the directive : Parliament noted that Directive 2011/36/EU was due to be transposed into Member States’ national laws by 6 April 2013, and that all Member States except one have notified the Commission of the transposition of this directive into national law. Members States should speed up the full and correct enforcement of Directive 2011/36/EU. Parliament emphasised that the EU’s legal and political framework recognises that trafficking is a gender-specific phenomenon and called on Member States to adopt gender-specific measures . The gender dimension must be consistently monitored in the implementation of EU anti-trafficking legislation.

Women and men, girls and boys are vulnerable in different ways, and are often trafficked for different purposes, and that prevention, assistance and support measures must therefore be gender-specific. Parliament welcomed the Commission’s creation of a webpage against trafficking that contains a database of EU-funded projects in the EU and elsewhere, up-to-date information on EU legal and political instruments, measures to combat people trafficking in the Member States, funding possibilities and EU initiatives.

It considered that asylum seekers, refugees and migrants are particularly vulnerable to trafficking and that special attention should be given to the trafficking of women, children and other vulnerable groups. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to investigate the link between the increasing numbers of refugees arriving and THB .

Parliament considered that greater consideration should be paid to the situation of transgender victims , who are considered as a vulnerable group and are particularly at risk of falling into the hands of traffickers. It believes that this vulnerability factor should be taken into account when Member States conduct individual risk assessments, so as to ensure that victims of trafficking receive appropriate protection and care. Adequate training on the specificities of transgender victims should be provided to officials so as to be able to identify them more proactively and adapt assistance services to meet their needs.

Gender perspective in the prevention of THB : Parliament stressed the need for a gender perspective approach based on four key strategies:

prevention; prosecution; victim protection; multi-level partnership.

It also stressed the need for a consistent approach to prosecution of offences related to human trafficking, and for the Member States to step up their investigations and prosecutions. Criminal penalties for crimes of human trafficking, modern slavery and exploitation should be put in place. Increased cross-border cooperation and collaboration with the relevant EU agencies is stressed. It called on Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies such as Eurojust, Europol, the FRA, Frontex, CEPOL and the EASO to develop a sustained programme of improving gender balance in decision-making relevant to trafficking.

The resolution also pointed out that it is also important for destination countries to ensure that women migrants who have been granted legal residency in the destination countries have access to language teaching and other means of social integration, education and training in particular, with the aim of enabling them to exercise their rights as citizens.

Parliament also called on the Members states to take more proactive preventative actions such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, training specifically designed for men, targeted workshops with vulnerable groups and education activities in schools, including promoting equality, combating sexist stereotypes and gender-based violence, as equal treatment should be an objective of the whole of society.

It also highlighted that owing to the coercive and deceptive nature of the crime, victims may be unable to recognise their own vulnerability. It called on Member States to implement Articles 11 to 17 of the Directive 2011/36/EU concerning protection and support of victims with a gender-sensitive approach. Parliament is strongly critical of the fact that it is not already a criminal offence to use the services of trafficked persons across all Member States.

The EU is called upon to pay attention to and make visible the new forms of trafficking and exploitation of human beings , including reproductive exploitation and trafficking in new-born children.

In general, Parliament considered that victims of trafficking should receive appropriate protection and care.

Prostitution : Parliament called for better implementation and monitoring of Directive 2011/36/EU, so as to ensure the non-prosecution of and non-application of sanctions or penalties to victims of THB, and emphasised that this includes the non-application of sanctions or penalties to people in prostitution and non-punishment for irregular entry or residence in countries of transit and destination.

It noted the lack of a common understanding among the Member States about what constitutes demand for exploitation, and called on the Commission and the Member States to propose guidelines on the punishment of the client based on the Nordic Model, while raising awareness about all forms of THB, especially sexual exploitation, and making other forms of exploitation like domestic servitude visible.

Parliament emphasised the data which confirm the deterrent effect that criminalisation of the purchase of sexual services has had in Sweden. It highlighted the normative effect of this model of regulation and its potential to change social attitudes in order to reduce overall demand for the services of victims of THB. In addition, Parliament called for campaigns to discourage demand for the sexual services of trafficked persons. It is of the opinion that demand reduction can be achieved through legislation that shifts the criminal burden onto those who purchase the sexual services of trafficked persons rather than onto those who sell it.

Parliament is also concerned at the growing phenomenon of sexual grooming and recalled that the victims are often in a state of emotional dependence, which hinders investigative work, as they are less easily identified as victims of trafficking in human beings and often refuse to testify against the people grooming them.

The gender dimension of assistance and support to, and protection of, victims : Parliament expressed concern that not all victims are able to access services easily or have knowledge of them. Victims of THB require specialised services, including access to safe short- and long-term accommodation, witness protection schemes, healthcare and counselling, translation and interpretation services, etc. The Commission is asked to come forward with a European strategy for combating gender violence, containing a legislative proposal on violence against women that includes THB.

Member States are called upon to:

establish hotlines which victims of human trafficking and exploitation can call to seek assistance and advice; provide free legal aid, including legal assistance and representation, psychological and medical support, and information on the rights to assistance and health care; make legal aid available to victims of trafficking not only in criminal proceedings, but also in any civil, labour or immigration/asylum proceedings in which they are involved.

Parliament stressed that the cumulative effect of different types of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity makes LGBTI people particularly vulnerable to trafficking in human beings. It underlined the importance for all Member States to recognise systematically the right to access to safe abortion services for female victims of THB whose pregnancy is a result of their exploitation.

Plenary also called on the Member States to ensure that EU and third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking are entitled to residence permits .

Assessment of other gender-sensitive measures taken in the implementation of the Directive : noting that the current EU Strategy towards the Eradication of THB comes to an end in 2016, Parliament called on the Commission to evaluate the current strategy and to introduce a new one that follows a human-rights-based approach, focusing on victims, includes a clear gender dimension and contains concrete actions in this regard, adequately and effectively addresses prevention, and continues to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of trafficking.

The resolution called on the Member States to collect more detailed and up-to-date data by compiling reliable statistical information gathered from all the main actors, by ensuring that the data is homogeneous and disaggregated by gender, age, type of exploitation (within the subsets of types of THB), country of origin and destination, and by including internally trafficked people, in order to better identify potential victims and prevent crime.

Member States should increase data sharing in order to better assess the gender dimension and recent trends in THB and combat trafficking more effectively.

Parliament called on the Commission to ensure that anti-trafficking is given greater priority in the European Agenda on Migration ( COM(2015)0240 ), so as to facilitate the engagement of victims in the prosecution of traffickers.

Despite the clear definition of THB given in the Directive, a number of different definitions have been adopted in Member States’ national legislation. Parliament called on the Commission to conduct research on this and to report on what these differences in definition mean in practical terms for the application of the Directive. It also urged the Commission, taking into account that the Istanbul Convention is an effective tool to prevent and combat violence against women, including trafficking, and to protect and assist the victims, to promote the Member States’ ratification of the Convention.

Documents
2016/05/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/04/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2016/04/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2016/04/19
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/04/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/03/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/01
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/05/21
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/05/21
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2014/10/13
   EP - BEARDER Catherine (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 33/1 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 557, -: 36, 0: 21
DE IT ES PL GB FR RO PT EL HU CZ BE BG SK FI AT SE NL HR IE LT LV SI LU DK CY EE MT
Total
74
59
48
40
46
69
29
21
19
17
17
18
14
13
12
15
11
22
10
9
8
8
7
5
9
5
4
3
icon: PPE PPE
185

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
153

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
56

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 33/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 550, -: 41, 0: 17
DE IT ES PL FR GB RO PT CZ HU AT BG BE EL SK FI SE NL HR IE LT LV SI LU DK CY EE MT
Total
74
59
48
40
67
46
28
21
16
16
15
13
18
19
13
12
11
22
10
9
8
8
7
5
9
5
4
3
icon: PPE PPE
185

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
151

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

For (1)

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 33/3 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: -: 408, +: 191, 0: 10
ES BE SE LT FI EE LU DK SI EL CY IE MT BG HR AT PT LV CZ HU NL SK IT RO FR GB DE PL
Total
48
18
10
8
12
4
5
8
7
19
5
9
3
14
10
15
21
8
17
17
22
13
59
28
68
45
74
40
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Finland ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
153

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Poland S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
185

Sweden PPE

For (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
5

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 33/4 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 456, -: 127, 0: 16
DE ES IT FR RO PT BG CZ SE IE AT BE FI HR SI LT CY LV LU NL EE EL HU MT DK SK PL GB
Total
72
48
58
67
28
21
14
17
11
9
15
17
12
10
7
8
5
8
4
22
4
18
15
3
7
13
38
46
icon: S&D S&D
149

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
180

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Romania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 48/1 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 553, -: 28, 0: 12
DE FR IT ES PL RO PT NL CZ BE HU BG GB FI EL SK HR AT IE SE LT LV SI LU DK CY EE MT
Total
69
68
58
47
40
28
21
21
17
17
15
14
43
12
18
12
10
15
9
10
8
8
7
5
7
5
4
3
icon: PPE PPE
178

Finland PPE

2

Austria PPE

Against (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
146

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Greece S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
54

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 48/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 480, -: 62, 0: 44
DE IT FR ES PL GB RO PT EL HU SK SE LV HR BE IE CZ BG SI AT FI CY MT LU LT DK EE NL
Total
70
57
68
47
38
44
28
21
18
14
12
10
8
10
16
9
17
12
7
15
12
4
3
4
8
7
4
21
icon: PPE PPE
172

Austria PPE

Against (1)

4

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
147

Greece S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 48/3 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 335, -: 177, 0: 67
IT PL FR DE ES PT SE RO SK IE BG EL HR CY FI MT LV SI HU EE CZ DK LU LT GB NL AT BE
Total
55
40
67
69
44
21
10
28
10
9
14
18
9
5
12
3
7
7
14
4
16
6
5
8
44
21
15
16
icon: S&D S&D
138

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Greece S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
174
4

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland PPE

2
5

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
54

Portugal ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 75 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 431, -: 104, 0: 3
DE ES IT FR RO PT BG CZ HU BE SE SK LT IE FI EL AT SI HR LU NL EE CY LV MT DK PL GB
Total
63
43
48
63
28
17
14
16
15
17
9
11
8
8
12
14
13
7
8
5
21
4
4
8
3
7
32
38
icon: PPE PPE
162

Lithuania PPE

1

Ireland PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
129

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Romania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
38

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
48

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 78 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 421, -: 65, 0: 43
DE ES FR IT RO PT CZ BG AT HU BE SE LT IE FI SK SI EL HR PL GB EE LV NL MT LU DK CY
Total
62
43
61
47
28
16
17
13
13
15
17
9
8
8
12
11
7
13
8
32
39
4
8
21
3
3
7
2
icon: PPE PPE
158

Lithuania PPE

1

Ireland PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Greece PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
125

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Greece S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

France GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: ECR ECR
48

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder - Résolution #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 391, 0: 53, -: 43
DE ES IT RO GB FR CZ BG BE PT PL FI SE IE NL SI LV HR AT EL LT LU HU EE DK CY SK MT
Total
50
39
44
28
36
58
17
14
16
13
31
10
8
7
20
7
8
7
12
14
7
5
12
3
5
3
9
2
icon: PPE PPE
146

Portugal PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Slovakia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Malta PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
110

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Denmark S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
52

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
46

Italy ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Belgium ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
27

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
28

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

3
AmendmentsDossier
358 2015/2118(INI)
2016/02/24 LIBE 117 amendments...
source: 578.516
2016/03/02 FEMM 241 amendments...
source: 578.660

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
docs/3
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0144_EN.html title: A8-0144/2016
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2016-04-26T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0144_EN.html title: A8-0144/2016
events/3
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0144_EN.html title: A8-0144/2016
summary
committees/0/shadows/3
name
BJÖRK Malin
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: BJÖRK Malin date: 2015-07-02T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.788
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-PR-576788_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.660
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-578660_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.345&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-575345_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0144_EN.html title: A8-0144/2016
summary
events/3
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0144_EN.html title: A8-0144/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0227_EN.html title: T8-0227/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0227_EN.html title: T8-0227/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/subtype/1
See also Directive 2011/36/EU 2010/0065(COD) See also 2020/2029(INI)
procedure/subtype/1
See also Directive 2011/36/EU 2010/0065(COD)
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: BJÖRK Malin date: 2015-07-02T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2015-07-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BJÖRK Malin group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/3/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0144&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0144_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0227
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0227_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria group: S&D name: HONEYBALL Mary group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2015-07-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin
  • date: 2016-04-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria group: S&D name: HONEYBALL Mary group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2015-07-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0144&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0144/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0227 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0227/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
FEMM
date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2015-07-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BJÖRK Malin group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2015-07-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin
docs
  • date: 2016-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.788 title: PE576.788 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.660 title: PE578.660 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.345&secondRef=02 title: PE575.345 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27125&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)486 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0144&language=EN title: A8-0144/2016 summary: The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the own-initiative report by Catherine BEARDER (ALDE, UK) on implementation of the Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective. The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, exercising the prerogative of an associated committee in line with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament , was also consulted to give an opinion on the report. To recall, trafficking in human beings (THB) is a violation of fundamental human rights under Article 5 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as a violation of the victim’s personal integrity and a serious organised crime that undermines the state and the rule of law. It has been addressed at many levels of governance, most notably in the EU with Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, which established a legal framework to better enable criminal prosecutions against traffickers. The current refugee crisis has shown up the lack of proper tools at a European level for jointly combating THB, especially when its aim is the sexual exploitation of women and children. The report noted that women and girls make up 80 % of registered victims of THB and children make up approximately 16 % of registered victims. 70 % of the identified victims of THB and 70 % of suspected traffickers in the EU are EU nationals. THB is a complex transnational phenomenon that can be tackled effectively only if the EU institutions and Member States work together in a coordinated manner in order to prevent ‘forum shopping’ by criminal groups and individuals. Addressing the gender dimension of THB in the implementation of the directive : Members noted that Directive 2011/36/EU was due to be transposed into Member States’ national laws by 6 April 2013, and that all Member States except one have notified the Commission of the transposition of this directive into national law. Members States should speed up the full and correct enforcement of Directive 2011/36/EU. The gender dimension must be consistently monitored in the implementation of EU anti-trafficking legislation. Women and men, girls and boys are vulnerable in different ways, and are often trafficked for different purposes, and that prevention, assistance and support measures must therefore be gender-specific . Members welcomed the Commission’s creation of a webpage against trafficking that contains a database of EU-funded projects in the EU and elsewhere, up-to-date information on EU legal and political instruments, measures to combat people trafficking in the Member States, funding possibilities and EU initiatives. They considered that asylum seekers, refugees and migrants are particularly vulnerable to trafficking and that special attention should be given to the trafficking of women, children and other vulnerable groups. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to investigate the link between the increasing numbers of refugees arriving and THB . Gender perspective in the prevention of THB : Members stressed the need for a gender perspective approach based on four key strategies: prevention; prosecution; victim protection; multi-level partnership. They also stressed the need for a consistent approach to prosecution of offences related to human trafficking, and for the Member States to step up their investigations and prosecutions. Criminal penalties for crimes of human trafficking, modern slavery and exploitation should be put in place. Increased cross-border cooperation and collaboration with the relevant EU agencies is stressed. Members called on Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies such as Eurojust, Europol, the FRA, Frontex, CEPOL and the EASO to develop a sustained programme of improving gender balance in decision-making relevant to trafficking. Members states are called upon to take more proactive preventative actions such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, training specifically designed for men, targeted workshops with vulnerable groups and education activities in schools, including promoting equality, combating sexist stereotypes and gender-based violence, as equal treatment should be an objective of the whole of society. The EU is called upon to pay attention to and make visible the new forms of trafficking and exploitation of human beings, including reproductive exploitation and trafficking in new-born children. Forced marriage can also be regarded as a form of trafficking in human beings if it contains an element of exploitation of the victim. The gender dimension of assistance and support to, and protection of, victims : Members expressed concern that not all victims are able to access services easily or have knowledge of them. Victims of THB require specialised services, including access to safe short- and long-term accommodation, witness protection schemes, healthcare and counselling, translation and interpretation services, etc. The Commission is asked to come forward with a European strategy for combating gender violence , containing a legislative proposal on violence against women that includes THB. Member States are called upon to: establish hotlines which victims of human trafficking and exploitation can call to seek assistance and advice; provide free legal aid, including legal assistance and representation, psychological and medical support, and information on the rights to assistance and health care; make legal aid available to victims of trafficking not only in criminal proceedings, but also in any civil, labour or immigration/asylum proceedings in which they are involved. Assessment of other gender-sensitive measures taken in the implementation of the Directive : noting that the current EU Strategy towards the Eradication of THB comes to an end in 2016, Members called on the Commission to evaluate the current strategy and to introduce a new one that follows a human-rights-based approach, focusing on victims, includes a clear gender dimension and contains concrete actions in this regard, adequately and effectively addresses prevention, and continues to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of trafficking. The report called on the Member States to collect more detailed and up-to-date data by compiling reliable statistical information gathered from all the main actors, by ensuring that the data is homogeneous and disaggregated by gender, age, type of exploitation (within the subsets of types of THB), country of origin and destination, and by including internally trafficked people, in order to better identify potential victims and prevent crime. Member States should increase data sharing in order to better assess the gender dimension and recent trends in THB and combat trafficking more effectively. Despite the clear definition of THB given in the Directive, a number of different definitions have been adopted in Member States’ national legislation. The Commission called on the Commission to conduct research on this and to report on what these differences in definition mean in practical terms for the application of the Directive.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27125&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0227 title: T8-0227/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 391 votes to 43, with 53 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of the Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective. To recall, trafficking in human beings (THB) is a violation of fundamental human rights under Article 5 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as a violation of the victim’s personal integrity and a serious organised crime that undermines the state and the rule of law. It has been addressed at many levels of governance, most notably in the EU with Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, which established a legal framework to better enable criminal prosecutions against traffickers. The current refugee crisis has shown up the lack of proper tools at a European level for jointly combating THB, especially when its aim is the sexual exploitation of women and children. Parliament noted that women and girls make up 80 % of registered victims of THB and children make up approximately 16 % of registered victims. 70 % of the identified victims of THB and 70 % of suspected traffickers in the EU are EU nationals. THB is a complex transnational phenomenon that can be tackled effectively only if the EU institutions and Member States work together in a coordinated manner in order to prevent ‘forum shopping’ by criminal groups and individuals. Addressing the gender dimension of THB in the implementation of the directive : Parliament noted that Directive 2011/36/EU was due to be transposed into Member States’ national laws by 6 April 2013, and that all Member States except one have notified the Commission of the transposition of this directive into national law. Members States should speed up the full and correct enforcement of Directive 2011/36/EU. Parliament emphasised that the EU’s legal and political framework recognises that trafficking is a gender-specific phenomenon and called on Member States to adopt gender-specific measures . The gender dimension must be consistently monitored in the implementation of EU anti-trafficking legislation. Women and men, girls and boys are vulnerable in different ways, and are often trafficked for different purposes, and that prevention, assistance and support measures must therefore be gender-specific. Parliament welcomed the Commission’s creation of a webpage against trafficking that contains a database of EU-funded projects in the EU and elsewhere, up-to-date information on EU legal and political instruments, measures to combat people trafficking in the Member States, funding possibilities and EU initiatives. It considered that asylum seekers, refugees and migrants are particularly vulnerable to trafficking and that special attention should be given to the trafficking of women, children and other vulnerable groups. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to investigate the link between the increasing numbers of refugees arriving and THB . Parliament considered that greater consideration should be paid to the situation of transgender victims , who are considered as a vulnerable group and are particularly at risk of falling into the hands of traffickers. It believes that this vulnerability factor should be taken into account when Member States conduct individual risk assessments, so as to ensure that victims of trafficking receive appropriate protection and care. Adequate training on the specificities of transgender victims should be provided to officials so as to be able to identify them more proactively and adapt assistance services to meet their needs. Gender perspective in the prevention of THB : Parliament stressed the need for a gender perspective approach based on four key strategies: prevention; prosecution; victim protection; multi-level partnership. It also stressed the need for a consistent approach to prosecution of offences related to human trafficking, and for the Member States to step up their investigations and prosecutions. Criminal penalties for crimes of human trafficking, modern slavery and exploitation should be put in place. Increased cross-border cooperation and collaboration with the relevant EU agencies is stressed. It called on Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies such as Eurojust, Europol, the FRA, Frontex, CEPOL and the EASO to develop a sustained programme of improving gender balance in decision-making relevant to trafficking. The resolution also pointed out that it is also important for destination countries to ensure that women migrants who have been granted legal residency in the destination countries have access to language teaching and other means of social integration, education and training in particular, with the aim of enabling them to exercise their rights as citizens. Parliament also called on the Members states to take more proactive preventative actions such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, training specifically designed for men, targeted workshops with vulnerable groups and education activities in schools, including promoting equality, combating sexist stereotypes and gender-based violence, as equal treatment should be an objective of the whole of society. It also highlighted that owing to the coercive and deceptive nature of the crime, victims may be unable to recognise their own vulnerability. It called on Member States to implement Articles 11 to 17 of the Directive 2011/36/EU concerning protection and support of victims with a gender-sensitive approach. Parliament is strongly critical of the fact that it is not already a criminal offence to use the services of trafficked persons across all Member States. The EU is called upon to pay attention to and make visible the new forms of trafficking and exploitation of human beings , including reproductive exploitation and trafficking in new-born children. In general, Parliament considered that victims of trafficking should receive appropriate protection and care. Prostitution : Parliament called for better implementation and monitoring of Directive 2011/36/EU, so as to ensure the non-prosecution of and non-application of sanctions or penalties to victims of THB, and emphasised that this includes the non-application of sanctions or penalties to people in prostitution and non-punishment for irregular entry or residence in countries of transit and destination. It noted the lack of a common understanding among the Member States about what constitutes demand for exploitation, and called on the Commission and the Member States to propose guidelines on the punishment of the client based on the Nordic Model, while raising awareness about all forms of THB, especially sexual exploitation, and making other forms of exploitation like domestic servitude visible. Parliament emphasised the data which confirm the deterrent effect that criminalisation of the purchase of sexual services has had in Sweden. It highlighted the normative effect of this model of regulation and its potential to change social attitudes in order to reduce overall demand for the services of victims of THB. In addition, Parliament called for campaigns to discourage demand for the sexual services of trafficked persons. It is of the opinion that demand reduction can be achieved through legislation that shifts the criminal burden onto those who purchase the sexual services of trafficked persons rather than onto those who sell it. Parliament is also concerned at the growing phenomenon of sexual grooming and recalled that the victims are often in a state of emotional dependence, which hinders investigative work, as they are less easily identified as victims of trafficking in human beings and often refuse to testify against the people grooming them. The gender dimension of assistance and support to, and protection of, victims : Parliament expressed concern that not all victims are able to access services easily or have knowledge of them. Victims of THB require specialised services, including access to safe short- and long-term accommodation, witness protection schemes, healthcare and counselling, translation and interpretation services, etc. The Commission is asked to come forward with a European strategy for combating gender violence, containing a legislative proposal on violence against women that includes THB. Member States are called upon to: establish hotlines which victims of human trafficking and exploitation can call to seek assistance and advice; provide free legal aid, including legal assistance and representation, psychological and medical support, and information on the rights to assistance and health care; make legal aid available to victims of trafficking not only in criminal proceedings, but also in any civil, labour or immigration/asylum proceedings in which they are involved. Parliament stressed that the cumulative effect of different types of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity makes LGBTI people particularly vulnerable to trafficking in human beings. It underlined the importance for all Member States to recognise systematically the right to access to safe abortion services for female victims of THB whose pregnancy is a result of their exploitation. Plenary also called on the Member States to ensure that EU and third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking are entitled to residence permits . Assessment of other gender-sensitive measures taken in the implementation of the Directive : noting that the current EU Strategy towards the Eradication of THB comes to an end in 2016, Parliament called on the Commission to evaluate the current strategy and to introduce a new one that follows a human-rights-based approach, focusing on victims, includes a clear gender dimension and contains concrete actions in this regard, adequately and effectively addresses prevention, and continues to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of trafficking. The resolution called on the Member States to collect more detailed and up-to-date data by compiling reliable statistical information gathered from all the main actors, by ensuring that the data is homogeneous and disaggregated by gender, age, type of exploitation (within the subsets of types of THB), country of origin and destination, and by including internally trafficked people, in order to better identify potential victims and prevent crime. Member States should increase data sharing in order to better assess the gender dimension and recent trends in THB and combat trafficking more effectively. Parliament called on the Commission to ensure that anti-trafficking is given greater priority in the European Agenda on Migration ( COM(2015)0240 ), so as to facilitate the engagement of victims in the prosecution of traffickers. Despite the clear definition of THB given in the Directive, a number of different definitions have been adopted in Member States’ national legislation. Parliament called on the Commission to conduct research on this and to report on what these differences in definition mean in practical terms for the application of the Directive. It also urged the Commission, taking into account that the Istanbul Convention is an effective tool to prevent and combat violence against women, including trafficking, and to protect and assist the victims, to promote the Member States’ ratification of the Convention.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
FEMM/8/03507
New
  • FEMM/8/03507
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
New
7.30.30.02
Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
procedure/subtype
Old
Implementation
New
  • Implementation
  • See also Directive 2011/36/EU 2010/0065(COD)
procedure/summary
  • See also Directive 2011/36/EU
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0227 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0227/2016
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the own-initiative report by Catherine BEARDER (ALDE, UK) on implementation of the Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective.

    The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, exercising the prerogative of an associated committee in line with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, was also consulted to give an opinion on the report.

    To recall, trafficking in human beings (THB) is a violation of fundamental human rights under Article 5 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as a violation of the victim’s personal integrity and a serious organised crime that undermines the state and the rule of law. It has been addressed at many levels of governance, most notably in the EU with Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, which established a legal framework to better enable criminal prosecutions against traffickers.

    The current refugee crisis has shown up the lack of proper tools at a European level for jointly combating THB, especially when its aim is the sexual exploitation of women and children.

    The report noted that women and girls make up 80 % of registered victims of THB and children make up approximately 16 % of registered victims. 70 % of the identified victims of THB and 70 % of suspected traffickers in the EU are EU nationals.

    THB is a complex transnational phenomenon that can be tackled effectively only if the EU institutions and Member States work together in a coordinated manner in order to prevent ‘forum shopping’ by criminal groups and individuals.

    Addressing the gender dimension of THB in the implementation of the directive: Members noted that Directive 2011/36/EU was due to be transposed into Member States’ national laws by 6 April 2013, and that all Member States except one have notified the Commission of the transposition of this directive into national law. Members States should speed up the full and correct enforcement of Directive 2011/36/EU. The gender dimension must be consistently monitored in the implementation of EU anti-trafficking legislation.

    Women and men, girls and boys are vulnerable in different ways, and are often trafficked for different purposes, and that prevention, assistance and support measures must therefore be gender-specific. Members welcomed the Commission’s creation of a webpage against trafficking that contains a database of EU-funded projects in the EU and elsewhere, up-to-date information on EU legal and political instruments, measures to combat people trafficking in the Member States, funding possibilities and EU initiatives.

    They considered that asylum seekers, refugees and migrants are particularly vulnerable to trafficking and that special attention should be given to the trafficking of women, children and other vulnerable groups. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to investigate the link between the increasing numbers of refugees arriving and THB.

    Gender perspective in the prevention of THB: Members stressed the need for a gender perspective approach based on four key strategies:

    • prevention;
    • prosecution;
    • victim protection;
    • multi-level partnership.

    They also stressed the need for a consistent approach to prosecution of offences related to human trafficking, and for the Member States to step up their investigations and prosecutions. Criminal penalties for crimes of human trafficking, modern slavery and exploitation should be put in place. Increased cross-border cooperation and collaboration with the relevant EU agencies is stressed.

    Members called on Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies such as Eurojust, Europol, the FRA, Frontex, CEPOL and the EASO to develop a sustained programme of improving gender balance in decision-making relevant to trafficking.

    Members states are called upon to take more proactive preventative actions such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, training specifically designed for men, targeted workshops with vulnerable groups and education activities in schools, including promoting equality, combating sexist stereotypes and gender-based violence, as equal treatment should be an objective of the whole of society.

    The EU is called upon to pay attention to and make visible the new forms of trafficking and exploitation of human beings, including reproductive exploitation and trafficking in new-born children.

    Forced marriage can also be regarded as a form of trafficking in human beings if it contains an element of exploitation of the victim.

    The gender dimension of assistance and support to, and protection of, victims: Members expressed concern that not all victims are able to access services easily or have knowledge of them. Victims of THB require specialised services, including access to safe short- and long-term accommodation, witness protection schemes, healthcare and counselling, translation and interpretation services, etc.

    The Commission is asked to come forward with a European strategy for combating gender violence, containing a legislative proposal on violence against women that includes THB.

    Member States are called upon to:

    • establish hotlines which victims of human trafficking and exploitation can call to seek assistance and advice;
    • provide free legal aid, including legal assistance and representation, psychological and medical support, and information on the rights to assistance and health care;
    • make legal aid available to victims of trafficking not only in criminal proceedings, but also in any civil, labour or immigration/asylum proceedings in which they are involved.

    Assessment of other gender-sensitive measures taken in the implementation of the Directive: noting that the current EU Strategy towards the Eradication of THB comes to an end in 2016, Members called on the Commission to evaluate the current strategy and to introduce a new one that follows a human-rights-based approach, focusing on victims, includes a clear gender dimension and contains concrete actions in this regard, adequately and effectively addresses prevention, and continues to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of trafficking.

    The report called on the Member States to collect more detailed and up-to-date data by compiling reliable statistical information gathered from all the main actors, by ensuring that the data is homogeneous and disaggregated by gender, age, type of exploitation (within the subsets of types of THB), country of origin and destination, and by including internally trafficked people, in order to better identify potential victims and prevent crime. Member States should increase data sharing in order to better assess the gender dimension and recent trends in THB and combat trafficking more effectively.

    Despite the clear definition of THB given in the Directive, a number of different definitions have been adopted in Member States’ national legislation. The Commission called on the Commission to conduct research on this and to report on what these differences in definition mean in practical terms for the application of the Directive.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0144&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0144/2016
activities/2/date
Old
2016-04-25T00:00:00
New
2016-04-27T00:00:00
activities/3/date
Old
2016-05-09T00:00:00
New
2016-05-12T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2016-04-25T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria group: S&D name: HONEYBALL Mary group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2015-07-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin
activities/1/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/1/date
Old
2016-04-18T00:00:00
New
2016-04-19T00:00:00
other/0/commissioner
Old
JOUROVÁ Věra
New
AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
BJÖRK Malin
activities/1/date
Old
2016-03-22T00:00:00
New
2016-04-18T00:00:00
activities/2/date
Old
2016-04-11T00:00:00
New
2016-05-09T00:00:00
committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
BJÖRK Malin
activities/2
date
2016-04-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1
date
2016-03-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/1/date
2015-07-02T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin
committees/1/date
2015-07-02T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: BJÖRK Malin
procedure/subject/0
Old
7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence and trafficking in human beings
New
7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
JOUROVÁ Věra
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: HONEYBALL Mary group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Associated committee) committee: LIBE
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: HONEYBALL Mary group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Associated committee) committee: LIBE
links
other
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    FEMM/8/03507
    reference
    2015/2118(INI)
    title
    Implementation of the Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Awaiting committee decision
    summary
    See also Directive 2011/36/EU
    subtype
    Implementation
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence and trafficking in human beings