Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | SARVAMAA Petri (EPP) | KÖLMEL Bernd (ECR), TORVALDS Nils (ALDE), NÍ RIADA Liadh (GUE/NGL), VANA Monika (Verts/ALE), ZANNI Marco (EFD) |
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | REGI |
Activites
-
2015/06/08
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2015/06/02
Non-legislative basic document published
- COM(2015)0232
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, GEORGIEVA Kristalina
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2015)0232
Amendments | Dossier |
10 |
2015/2125(BUD)
2015/06/17
BUDG
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that, during the 2000s, personnel numbers in Finnish subsidiaries on all continents increased, until Asia emerged as the greatest employer in the electronics and electrical industry in 2004 and personnel numbers in Europe started declining; considers that the redundancies in Broadcom are partly linked to the trend that affects the entire Finnish electronics industry and culminated in Nokia's announcement of large-scale redundancies in 2011; concludes however that those events are
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Recalls that the Commission mid- term evaluation of the EGF should also take into account the long-term impact of the crisis and globalisation on SMEs such as downstream producers in this case, and therefore evaluate the possibility of lowering the criteria of 500 workers being made redundant set up in Article 4 of the EGF Regulation, as suggested by the European Parliament in its resolution of 17 September 2014 on the mobilisation of European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2014/000 TA 2014 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission)1a; ________________ 1aTexts adopted, P8_TA(2014)0016.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that the enterprise surveys and visits are actions which may benefit not only dismissed workers covered by this application, but may also contribute to building knowledge about employment issues within this sector for future redundancies; notes that these specific actions are already a continuation of a similar measure carried out during an earlier EGF case in Finland (EGF/2013/001 FI/Nokia);
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that the authorities plan to use 17,46% of all costs on allowances and incentives in the form of pay subsidies (as part of the salary for each employment relationship established for a targeted worker) and allowances for travel, overnight and removal costs, which amounts to half of the maximum allowed 35 % of all costs for such measures;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Notes that the estimated cost of the pay subsidy amounts up to EUR 6000 per beneficiary, applying to a relatively small group of all targeted workers (62 beneficiaries);
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Welcomes the complementarity of the proposed EGF interventions with other actions funded by national or Union funds;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Underlines more generally the need to extend access to EGF support to young people up to the age of 25 who are not in employment, education or training (NEETs) in equal numbers to workers receiving support in regions with high youth unemployment, if it is demonstrated in the mid-term evaluation that there is a need to maintain this measure after December 2017, and to accordingly review the MFF in order to enable such a change in a more sustainable manner;
source: 560.767
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/03625
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0232/COM_COM(2015)0232_EN.pdf
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|