BETA


2015/2127(INI) European Investment Bank (EIB) - Annual report 2014

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT PIRINSKI Georgi (icon: S&D S&D) HAYES Brian (icon: PPE PPE), CZARNECKI Ryszard (icon: ECR ECR), DLABAJOVÁ Martina (icon: ALDE ALDE), DE JONG Dennis (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion INTA JADOT Yannick (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Salvatore CICU (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion BUDG GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion ECON PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL) Barbara KAPPEL (icon: ENF ENF), Thomas MANN (icon: PPE PPE), Stanisław OŻÓG (icon: ECR ECR), Maria João RODRIGUES (icon: S&D S&D), Marco VALLI (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion REGI JAKOVČIĆ Ivan (icon: ALDE ALDE) Salvatore CICU (icon: PPE PPE), James NICHOLSON (icon: ECR ECR), Davor ŠKRLEC (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/09/22
   Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/04/28
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 468 votes to 87 with 66 abstentions a resolution on the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Annual Report 2014.

Members recalled that the core task of the EIB, is to support financially projects in the interest of the Union that contribute to the balanced development of the internal market and to social, economic and territorial cohesion, and thus strengthen European integration, by fostering an increase in jobs and competitiveness.

The EIB’s investment programme should underpin the EU policy objectives in the following way:

Prioritising investments to accelerate recovery and enhance productivity : Parliament encouraged the EIB to continue in its efforts to increase the low level of investment in the EU.

Members welcomed the fact that in 2014, the EIB funded 285,000 small and medium-sized enterprises, thus safeguarding 3.6 million jobs , and signed contracts for a total of 413 projects within the EU worth EUR 69 billion and 92 new projects outside the EU for a total of EUR 7.98 billion. They observed, however, that in 2014 59.4 % of all EIB-signed projects were allocated to the top five EU economies, while the share of the other 23 Member States stood at only 30.3 %. They encouraged the EIB to implement a more balanced lending policy towards Member States, given the intensity of both the current and the long-term challenges facing the Union.

The EIB was called on to:

focus on investments in the real economy in order to stimulate jobs and growth in the EU; take into consideration when implementing its policies the fact that the unemployment rate is very high, particularly among young people; target its operations at generating investments that enhance economic recovery and productive employment , accompanied by consistent support to Member States aimed at increasing absorption capacities where necessary give decisive priority to the long-term effect of investments , regarding not only financial indicators but also, above all, their contribution to sustainable development and to a better quality of life by means of further improvements in the field of employment, social standards and the environment.

The resolution emphasised that project funding approval should be based on adequate financial and risk analysis , financial viability and sound budgetary management. Projects approved for EIB funding should offer clear added value to the European economy. Investment, structural reforms and sound budgetary policies must be part of an overall strategy.

Promoting youth employment, innovation and SMEs : Parliament encouraged the EIB to continue investing in education, skills development and jobs for young people and called on the EIB to report comprehensively on the results achieved by its Investing for Youth initiative.

Noting that SMEs in many parts of Europe face extreme difficulties accessing necessary finance, Members welcomed, in this context, the greater emphasis the EIB is placing on supporting SMEs . They emphasised the importance of the EIB in facilitating partnerships and strengthening support instruments for funding micro, small and medium-sized enterprises’ activity and for innovative start-ups. They called furthermore on the EIB to cooperate more closely with regional public institutions with a view to optimising the financing possibilities for SMEs, and develop an effective communication policy addressing potential private beneficiaries, as an integral part of its advisory function.

Enhancing environmental sustainability and climate action : Parliament noted that out of the 84 environment projects signed in 2014 inside the EU, amounting to a total of EUR 12.6 billion, sustainable transport projects accounted for EUR 5.1 billion, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects for EUR 3.7 billion, and protection of the environment projects for EUR 3.8 billion. Signed operations for the ‘climate action’ cross-cutting objective amounted to 24 % of total EIB financing inside the EU.

In this context, Members:

welcomed the launch in 2014 of new innovative instruments to support climate action, such as the Private Finance for Energy Efficiency instrument and the Natural Capital Financing Facility; encouraged the EIB’s commitment to supporting initiatives helping the EU both to stay a front-runner and to fulfil its own long-standing carbon market ambitions; called for a review of the share of EIB investments in climate action , as the 25% share has already been reached.

Promoting economic and social cohesion and convergence : Parliament recalled that EUR 19.9 billion, or 29% of total EIB financing inside the EU in 2014, were for operations supporting cohesion. It urged the EIB to include in its future annual reports detailed information about the contribution and results achieved towards implementing the objectives of cohesion policy.

The resolution called for EIB financing to be deployed towards the areas most affected by high unemployment , and for more social infrastructure projects. EIB financing should focus primarily on those countries that are lagging behind in terms of infrastructure quality and development, bearing in mind, however, the principle of sound financial management and viability of projects.

Members were concerned by the tendency to finance infrastructure such as motorways, which encourage fossil fuel consumption and therefore run counter to the Union’s long-term objectives of moving towards a carbon-free economy. They called on the EIB to include a compulsory ex-ante assessment of environmental, economic and social added value in the process for selecting projects to be funded inside and outside the EU. They also called for increased support to projects covered by the EU macro-regional strategies .

European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) : Parliament welcomed the new EFSI , emphasising the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way. It recommended close cooperation and overview of EFSI operations by Parliament and the European Court of Auditors.

The resolution stressed that the EFSI should benefit all Member States without sectoral and regional pre-allocation, and should also be consistent with ongoing regional or local investment initiatives; emphasises that EFSI funding should also benefit small-scale projects.

Furthermore, it recommended that Member States designate national promotional banks and closer cooperation between the EIB and national promotional banks, financial institutions and investment platforms, in order to pool and share expertise and know-how as well as to better align EIB actions with Member States’ policy priorities.

Members recalled that the EFSI guarantee was meant to enable the EIB to take more risks while maintaining its triple-A rating . They stressed that they will be extremely vigilant in monitoring compliance with this criterion.

In addition, the Parliament called on the EIB:

to seriously assess the financial, social and environmental impact of the Project Bonds Initiative ;

to update the external dimension of EIB interventions by paying particular attention to third countries and regions outside the EU suffering from conflict and extreme poverty and continuing to actively promote sustainable growth in developing countries; Members encouraged the EIB to develop and deploy the necessary comprehensive approach in response to the severe challenges generated by the flow of migrants to Europe, and they called for stronger conditionality for financing linked to respect for human rights and freedom of expression; to enhance the EIB’s governance, transparency and control framework. The EIB was called on to: i) to update its policies in the context of the ex-ante assessments of undertakings which are the subject of judicial investigations, as well as policies on anti-money laundering and on combating the financing of terrorism and organised crime; ii) guarantee maximum transparency and publicity regarding the system of contracts and subcontracts; iii) to develop more stringent rules on conflicts of interest; iv) to ensure that companies participating in projects co-financed by the EIB should be required to adhere to the principle of equal pay and pay transparency and to the principle of gender equality.

Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/04/27
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/03/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report by Georgi PIRINSKI (S&D, BG) on the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Annual Report 2014.

Members recalled that the core task of the EIB, is to support financially projects in the interest of the Union that contribute to the balanced development of the internal market and to social, economic and territorial cohesion, and thus strengthen European integration.

The EIB’s investment programme should underpin the EU policy objectives in the following way:

Prioritising investments to accelerate recovery and enhance productivity : Members encouraged the EIB to continue in its efforts to increase the low level of investment in the EU.

Members welcomed the fact that in 2014, the EIB funded 285,000 small and medium-sized enterprises, thus safeguarding 3.6 million jobs , and signed contracts for a total of 413 projects within the EU worth EUR 69 billion and 92 new projects outside the EU for a total of EUR 7.98 billion. They were delighted that the volume of signatures achieved by the EIB in 2014 is at its highest level since 2009, but stressed that signature levels have further potential.

The EIB was called on to:

provide increased technical support at pre-approval stage for Member States that have a lower success rate for project approval; focus on investments in the real economy in order to stimulate jobs and growth in the EU; target its operations at generating investments that enhance economic recovery and productive employment ; give decisive priority to the long-term effect of investments , regarding not only financial indicators but also, above all, their contribution to sustainable development and to a better quality of life by means of further improvements in the field of employment, social standards and the environment.

The report emphasised that project funding approval should be based on adequate financial and risk analysis , financial viability and sound budgetary management. Projects approved for EIB funding should offer clear added value to the European economy.

Promoting youth employment, innovation and SMEs : Members encouraged the EIB to continue investing in education, skills development and jobs for young people and called on the EIB to report comprehensively on the results achieved by its Investing for Youth initiative.

Noting that SMEs in many parts of Europe face extreme difficulties accessing necessary finance, Members welcomed, in this context, the greater emphasis the EIB is placing on supporting SMEs . They emphasised the importance of the EIB in facilitating partnerships and strengthening support instruments for funding micro, small and medium-sized enterprises’ activity and for innovative start-ups. They called furthermore on the EIB to cooperate more closely with regional public institutions with a view to optimising the financing possibilities for SMEs.

Enhancing environmental sustainability and climate action : the report noted that out of the 84 environment projects signed in 2014 inside the EU, amounting to a total of EUR 12.6 billion, sustainable transport projects accounted for EUR 5.1 billion, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects for EUR 3.7 billion, and protection of the environment projects for EUR 3.8 billion.

The report welcomed the launch in 2014 of new innovative instruments to support climate action, such as the Private Finance for Energy Efficiency instrument and the Natural Capital Financing Facility.

Members encouraged the EIB’s commitment to supporting initiatives helping the EU both to stay a front-runner and to fulfil its own long-standing carbon market ambitions. They called for a review of the share of EIB investments in climate action, as the 25% share has already been reached.

Promoting economic and social cohesion and convergence : EUR 19.9 billion, or 29% of total EIB financing inside the EU in 2014, were for operations supporting cohesion. Members regretted, however, that there is no information about the number of projects supported by the EIB Group under the relevant sectors. They urged the EIB to include in its future annual reports detailed information about the contribution and results achieved towards implementing the objectives of cohesion policy.

The report called for EIB financing to be deployed towards the areas most affected by high unemployment , and for more social infrastructure projects. EIB financing should focus primarily on those countries which are lagging behind in terms of infrastructure quality and development, bearing in mind, however, the principle of sound financial management and viability of projects.

Members were concerned by the tendency to finance infrastructure such as motorways, which encourage fossil fuel consumption and therefore run counter to the Union’s long-term objectives of moving towards a carbon-free economy. They called for increased support to projects covered by the EU macro-regional strategies .

European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) : Members welcomed the new EFSI , emphasising the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way. They recommended close cooperation and overview of EFSI operations by Parliament and the European Court of Auditors.

The report stressed that the EFSI should benefit all Member States without sectoral and regional pre-allocation, and should also be consistent with ongoing regional or local investment initiatives; emphasises that EFSI funding should also benefit small-scale projects.

Furthermore, it recommended that Member States designate national promotional banks and closer cooperation between the EIB and national promotional banks, financial institutions and investment platforms, in order to pool and share expertise and know-how as well as to better align EIB actions with Member States’ policy priorities.

Members recalled that the EFSI guarantee was meant to enable the EIB to take more risks while maintaining its triple-A rating . They stressed that they will be extremely vigilant in monitoring compliance with this criterion.

In addition, the report called on the EIB:

to seriously assess the financial, social and environmental impact of the Project Bonds Initiative ; to update the external dimension of EIB interventions by paying particular attention to third countries and regions outside the EU suffering from conflict and extreme poverty and continuing to actively promote sustainable growth in developing countries; Members encouraged the EIB to develop and deploy the necessary comprehensive approach in response to the severe challenges generated by the flow of migrants to Europe; to enhance the EIB’s governance, transparency and control framework.

The EIB is called on to: i) to update its policies in the context of the ex-ante assessments of undertakings which are the subject of judicial investigations, as well as policies on anti-money laundering and on combating the financing of terrorism and organised crime; ii) guarantee maximum transparency and publicity regarding the system of contracts and subcontracts ; iii) to develop more stringent rules on conflicts of interest; iv) to ensure that companies participating in projects co-financed by the EIB should be required to adhere to the principle of equal pay and pay transparency and to the principle of gender equality.

Documents
2016/02/23
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2015/12/10
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/12/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/12/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/11/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/11/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/10/22
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/06/17
   EP - Committee Opinion
2015/06/16
   EP - Responsible Committee
2015/06/15
   EP - Committee Opinion
2015/06/11
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2015/06/08
   EP - Committee Opinion
2015/05/11
   EP - Committee Opinion

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0050/2016 - Georgi Pirinski - Am 7

2016/04/28 Outcome: +: 365, -: 228, 0: 28
GB PL IT SE ES EL DK DE PT MT FR CY IE SK BE CZ FI RO HR LT LV LU BG AT HU SI EE NL
Total
54
44
62
13
42
16
11
75
16
6
65
5
10
12
20
21
8
24
10
8
7
3
16
18
18
6
5
26
icon: S&D S&D
154

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2
2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Denmark ALDE

3

Germany ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: PPE PPE
186

Sweden PPE

2

Greece PPE

For (1)

3

Malta PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Croatia PPE

For (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0050/2016 - Georgi Pirinski - Résolution

2016/04/28 Outcome: +: 468, -: 87, 0: 66
DE ES PL RO IT FR CZ HU NL BG BE PT AT SE IE HR SK LT LV FI DK GB SI MT EE CY EL LU
Total
75
41
44
24
63
62
21
17
26
16
20
16
18
13
10
10
13
8
8
9
11
54
6
6
5
5
17
3
icon: PPE PPE
185
2

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
151
3

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
58

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
323 2015/2127(INI)
2015/10/21 REGI 53 amendments...
source: 569.838
2015/11/06 INTA 179 amendments...
source: 569.704
2015/11/24 BUDG 21 amendments...
source: 572.845
2015/11/30 CONT 70 amendments...
source: 572.929

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2015-06-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-06-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-06-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PIRINSKI Georgi body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2015-05-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2015-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2015-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-06-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-06-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PIRINSKI Georgi body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2015-05-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2015-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2015-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0050&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0050/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0200 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0200/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2015-06-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PIRINSKI Georgi group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2015-06-08T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2015-06-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JADOT Yannick group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2015-06-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: S&D name: PIRINSKI Georgi
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-06-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2015-05-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2015-05-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2015-06-15T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2015-06-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2015-06-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
docs
  • date: 2015-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE565.145 title: PE565.145 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.790&secondRef=02 title: PE567.790 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.827&secondRef=02 title: PE567.827 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-12-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.929 title: PE572.929 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.658&secondRef=02 title: PE567.658 committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.413&secondRef=02 title: PE571.413 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26895&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)485 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-06-11T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0050&language=EN title: A8-0050/2016 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report by Georgi PIRINSKI (S&D, BG) on the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Annual Report 2014. Members recalled that the core task of the EIB, is to support financially projects in the interest of the Union that contribute to the balanced development of the internal market and to social, economic and territorial cohesion, and thus strengthen European integration. The EIB’s investment programme should underpin the EU policy objectives in the following way: Prioritising investments to accelerate recovery and enhance productivity : Members encouraged the EIB to continue in its efforts to increase the low level of investment in the EU. Members welcomed the fact that in 2014, the EIB funded 285,000 small and medium-sized enterprises, thus safeguarding 3.6 million jobs , and signed contracts for a total of 413 projects within the EU worth EUR 69 billion and 92 new projects outside the EU for a total of EUR 7.98 billion. They were delighted that the volume of signatures achieved by the EIB in 2014 is at its highest level since 2009, but stressed that signature levels have further potential. The EIB was called on to: provide increased technical support at pre-approval stage for Member States that have a lower success rate for project approval; focus on investments in the real economy in order to stimulate jobs and growth in the EU; target its operations at generating investments that enhance economic recovery and productive employment ; give decisive priority to the long-term effect of investments , regarding not only financial indicators but also, above all, their contribution to sustainable development and to a better quality of life by means of further improvements in the field of employment, social standards and the environment. The report emphasised that project funding approval should be based on adequate financial and risk analysis , financial viability and sound budgetary management. Projects approved for EIB funding should offer clear added value to the European economy. Promoting youth employment, innovation and SMEs : Members encouraged the EIB to continue investing in education, skills development and jobs for young people and called on the EIB to report comprehensively on the results achieved by its Investing for Youth initiative. Noting that SMEs in many parts of Europe face extreme difficulties accessing necessary finance, Members welcomed, in this context, the greater emphasis the EIB is placing on supporting SMEs . They emphasised the importance of the EIB in facilitating partnerships and strengthening support instruments for funding micro, small and medium-sized enterprises’ activity and for innovative start-ups. They called furthermore on the EIB to cooperate more closely with regional public institutions with a view to optimising the financing possibilities for SMEs. Enhancing environmental sustainability and climate action : the report noted that out of the 84 environment projects signed in 2014 inside the EU, amounting to a total of EUR 12.6 billion, sustainable transport projects accounted for EUR 5.1 billion, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects for EUR 3.7 billion, and protection of the environment projects for EUR 3.8 billion. The report welcomed the launch in 2014 of new innovative instruments to support climate action, such as the Private Finance for Energy Efficiency instrument and the Natural Capital Financing Facility. Members encouraged the EIB’s commitment to supporting initiatives helping the EU both to stay a front-runner and to fulfil its own long-standing carbon market ambitions. They called for a review of the share of EIB investments in climate action, as the 25% share has already been reached. Promoting economic and social cohesion and convergence : EUR 19.9 billion, or 29% of total EIB financing inside the EU in 2014, were for operations supporting cohesion. Members regretted, however, that there is no information about the number of projects supported by the EIB Group under the relevant sectors. They urged the EIB to include in its future annual reports detailed information about the contribution and results achieved towards implementing the objectives of cohesion policy. The report called for EIB financing to be deployed towards the areas most affected by high unemployment , and for more social infrastructure projects. EIB financing should focus primarily on those countries which are lagging behind in terms of infrastructure quality and development, bearing in mind, however, the principle of sound financial management and viability of projects. Members were concerned by the tendency to finance infrastructure such as motorways, which encourage fossil fuel consumption and therefore run counter to the Union’s long-term objectives of moving towards a carbon-free economy. They called for increased support to projects covered by the EU macro-regional strategies . European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) : Members welcomed the new EFSI , emphasising the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way. They recommended close cooperation and overview of EFSI operations by Parliament and the European Court of Auditors. The report stressed that the EFSI should benefit all Member States without sectoral and regional pre-allocation, and should also be consistent with ongoing regional or local investment initiatives; emphasises that EFSI funding should also benefit small-scale projects. Furthermore, it recommended that Member States designate national promotional banks and closer cooperation between the EIB and national promotional banks, financial institutions and investment platforms, in order to pool and share expertise and know-how as well as to better align EIB actions with Member States’ policy priorities. Members recalled that the EFSI guarantee was meant to enable the EIB to take more risks while maintaining its triple-A rating . They stressed that they will be extremely vigilant in monitoring compliance with this criterion. In addition, the report called on the EIB: to seriously assess the financial, social and environmental impact of the Project Bonds Initiative ; to update the external dimension of EIB interventions by paying particular attention to third countries and regions outside the EU suffering from conflict and extreme poverty and continuing to actively promote sustainable growth in developing countries; Members encouraged the EIB to develop and deploy the necessary comprehensive approach in response to the severe challenges generated by the flow of migrants to Europe; to enhance the EIB’s governance, transparency and control framework. The EIB is called on to: i) to update its policies in the context of the ex-ante assessments of undertakings which are the subject of judicial investigations, as well as policies on anti-money laundering and on combating the financing of terrorism and organised crime; ii) guarantee maximum transparency and publicity regarding the system of contracts and subcontracts ; iii) to develop more stringent rules on conflicts of interest; iv) to ensure that companies participating in projects co-financed by the EIB should be required to adhere to the principle of equal pay and pay transparency and to the principle of gender equality.
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26895&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0200 title: T8-0200/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 468 votes to 87 with 66 abstentions a resolution on the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Annual Report 2014. Members recalled that the core task of the EIB, is to support financially projects in the interest of the Union that contribute to the balanced development of the internal market and to social, economic and territorial cohesion, and thus strengthen European integration, by fostering an increase in jobs and competitiveness. The EIB’s investment programme should underpin the EU policy objectives in the following way: Prioritising investments to accelerate recovery and enhance productivity : Parliament encouraged the EIB to continue in its efforts to increase the low level of investment in the EU. Members welcomed the fact that in 2014, the EIB funded 285,000 small and medium-sized enterprises, thus safeguarding 3.6 million jobs , and signed contracts for a total of 413 projects within the EU worth EUR 69 billion and 92 new projects outside the EU for a total of EUR 7.98 billion. They observed, however, that in 2014 59.4 % of all EIB-signed projects were allocated to the top five EU economies, while the share of the other 23 Member States stood at only 30.3 %. They encouraged the EIB to implement a more balanced lending policy towards Member States, given the intensity of both the current and the long-term challenges facing the Union. The EIB was called on to: focus on investments in the real economy in order to stimulate jobs and growth in the EU; take into consideration when implementing its policies the fact that the unemployment rate is very high, particularly among young people; target its operations at generating investments that enhance economic recovery and productive employment , accompanied by consistent support to Member States aimed at increasing absorption capacities where necessary give decisive priority to the long-term effect of investments , regarding not only financial indicators but also, above all, their contribution to sustainable development and to a better quality of life by means of further improvements in the field of employment, social standards and the environment. The resolution emphasised that project funding approval should be based on adequate financial and risk analysis , financial viability and sound budgetary management. Projects approved for EIB funding should offer clear added value to the European economy. Investment, structural reforms and sound budgetary policies must be part of an overall strategy. Promoting youth employment, innovation and SMEs : Parliament encouraged the EIB to continue investing in education, skills development and jobs for young people and called on the EIB to report comprehensively on the results achieved by its Investing for Youth initiative. Noting that SMEs in many parts of Europe face extreme difficulties accessing necessary finance, Members welcomed, in this context, the greater emphasis the EIB is placing on supporting SMEs . They emphasised the importance of the EIB in facilitating partnerships and strengthening support instruments for funding micro, small and medium-sized enterprises’ activity and for innovative start-ups. They called furthermore on the EIB to cooperate more closely with regional public institutions with a view to optimising the financing possibilities for SMEs, and develop an effective communication policy addressing potential private beneficiaries, as an integral part of its advisory function. Enhancing environmental sustainability and climate action : Parliament noted that out of the 84 environment projects signed in 2014 inside the EU, amounting to a total of EUR 12.6 billion, sustainable transport projects accounted for EUR 5.1 billion, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects for EUR 3.7 billion, and protection of the environment projects for EUR 3.8 billion. Signed operations for the ‘climate action’ cross-cutting objective amounted to 24 % of total EIB financing inside the EU. In this context, Members: welcomed the launch in 2014 of new innovative instruments to support climate action, such as the Private Finance for Energy Efficiency instrument and the Natural Capital Financing Facility; encouraged the EIB’s commitment to supporting initiatives helping the EU both to stay a front-runner and to fulfil its own long-standing carbon market ambitions; called for a review of the share of EIB investments in climate action , as the 25% share has already been reached. Promoting economic and social cohesion and convergence : Parliament recalled that EUR 19.9 billion, or 29% of total EIB financing inside the EU in 2014, were for operations supporting cohesion. It urged the EIB to include in its future annual reports detailed information about the contribution and results achieved towards implementing the objectives of cohesion policy. The resolution called for EIB financing to be deployed towards the areas most affected by high unemployment , and for more social infrastructure projects. EIB financing should focus primarily on those countries that are lagging behind in terms of infrastructure quality and development, bearing in mind, however, the principle of sound financial management and viability of projects. Members were concerned by the tendency to finance infrastructure such as motorways, which encourage fossil fuel consumption and therefore run counter to the Union’s long-term objectives of moving towards a carbon-free economy. They called on the EIB to include a compulsory ex-ante assessment of environmental, economic and social added value in the process for selecting projects to be funded inside and outside the EU. They also called for increased support to projects covered by the EU macro-regional strategies . European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) : Parliament welcomed the new EFSI , emphasising the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way. It recommended close cooperation and overview of EFSI operations by Parliament and the European Court of Auditors. The resolution stressed that the EFSI should benefit all Member States without sectoral and regional pre-allocation, and should also be consistent with ongoing regional or local investment initiatives; emphasises that EFSI funding should also benefit small-scale projects. Furthermore, it recommended that Member States designate national promotional banks and closer cooperation between the EIB and national promotional banks, financial institutions and investment platforms, in order to pool and share expertise and know-how as well as to better align EIB actions with Member States’ policy priorities. Members recalled that the EFSI guarantee was meant to enable the EIB to take more risks while maintaining its triple-A rating . They stressed that they will be extremely vigilant in monitoring compliance with this criterion. In addition, the Parliament called on the EIB: to seriously assess the financial, social and environmental impact of the Project Bonds Initiative ; to update the external dimension of EIB interventions by paying particular attention to third countries and regions outside the EU suffering from conflict and extreme poverty and continuing to actively promote sustainable growth in developing countries; Members encouraged the EIB to develop and deploy the necessary comprehensive approach in response to the severe challenges generated by the flow of migrants to Europe, and they called for stronger conditionality for financing linked to respect for human rights and freedom of expression; to enhance the EIB’s governance, transparency and control framework. The EIB was called on to: i) to update its policies in the context of the ex-ante assessments of undertakings which are the subject of judicial investigations, as well as policies on anti-money laundering and on combating the financing of terrorism and organised crime; ii) guarantee maximum transparency and publicity regarding the system of contracts and subcontracts; iii) to develop more stringent rules on conflicts of interest; iv) to ensure that companies participating in projects co-financed by the EIB should be required to adhere to the principle of equal pay and pay transparency and to the principle of gender equality.
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/03637
New
  • CONT/8/03637
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.40.07 European Investment Bank
New
8.40.07
European Investment Bank (EIB)
activities/4
date
2016-04-28T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0200 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0200/2016
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4
date
2016-04-28T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report by Georgi PIRINSKI (S&D, BG) on the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Annual Report 2014.

    Members recalled that the core task of the EIB, is to support financially projects in the interest of the Union that contribute to the balanced development of the internal market and to social, economic and territorial cohesion, and thus strengthen European integration.

    The EIB’s investment programme should underpin the EU policy objectives in the following way:

    Prioritising investments to accelerate recovery and enhance productivity: Members encouraged the EIB to continue in its efforts to increase the low level of investment in the EU.

    Members welcomed the fact that in 2014, the EIB funded 285,000 small and medium-sized enterprises, thus safeguarding 3.6 million jobs, and signed contracts for a total of 413 projects within the EU worth EUR 69 billion and 92 new projects outside the EU for a total of EUR 7.98 billion. They were delighted that the volume of signatures achieved by the EIB in 2014 is at its highest level since 2009, but stressed that signature levels have further potential.

    The EIB was called on to:

    • provide increased technical support at pre-approval stage for Member States that have a lower success rate for project approval;
    • focus on investments in the real economy in order to stimulate jobs and growth in the EU;
    • target its operations at generating investments that enhance economic recovery and productive employment;
    • give decisive priority to the long-term effect of investments, regarding not only financial indicators but also, above all, their contribution to sustainable development and to a better quality of life by means of further improvements in the field of employment, social standards and the environment.

    The report emphasised that project funding approval should be based on adequate financial and risk analysis, financial viability and sound budgetary management. Projects approved for EIB funding should offer clear added value to the European economy.

    Promoting youth employment, innovation and SMEs: Members encouraged the EIB to continue investing in education, skills development and jobs for young people and called on the EIB to report comprehensively on the results achieved by its Investing for Youth initiative.

    Noting that SMEs in many parts of Europe face extreme difficulties accessing necessary finance, Members welcomed, in this context, the greater emphasis the EIB is placing on supporting SMEs. They emphasised the importance of the EIB in facilitating partnerships and strengthening support instruments for funding micro, small and medium-sized enterprises’ activity and for innovative start-ups. They called furthermore on the EIB to cooperate more closely with regional public institutions with a view to optimising the financing possibilities for SMEs.

    Enhancing environmental sustainability and climate action: the report noted that out of the 84 environment projects signed in 2014 inside the EU, amounting to a total of EUR 12.6 billion, sustainable transport projects accounted for EUR 5.1 billion, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects for EUR 3.7 billion, and protection of the environment projects for EUR 3.8 billion.

    The report welcomed the launch in 2014 of new innovative instruments to support climate action, such as the Private Finance for Energy Efficiency instrument and the Natural Capital Financing Facility.

    Members encouraged the EIB’s commitment to supporting initiatives helping the EU both to stay a front-runner and to fulfil its own long-standing carbon market ambitions. They called for a review of the share of EIB investments in climate action, as the 25% share has already been reached.

    Promoting economic and social cohesion and convergence: EUR 19.9 billion, or 29% of total EIB financing inside the EU in 2014, were for operations supporting cohesion. Members regretted, however, that there is no information about the number of projects supported by the EIB Group under the relevant sectors. They urged the EIB to include in its future annual reports detailed information about the contribution and results achieved towards implementing the objectives of cohesion policy.

    The report called for EIB financing to be deployed towards the areas most affected by high unemployment, and for more social infrastructure projects. EIB financing should focus primarily on those countries which are lagging behind in terms of infrastructure quality and development, bearing in mind, however, the principle of sound financial management and viability of projects.

    Members were concerned by the tendency to finance infrastructure such as motorways, which encourage fossil fuel consumption and therefore run counter to the Union’s long-term objectives of moving towards a carbon-free economy. They called for increased support to projects covered by the EU macro-regional strategies.

    European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI): Members welcomed the new EFSI, emphasising the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way. They recommended close cooperation and overview of EFSI operations by Parliament and the European Court of Auditors.

    The report stressed that the EFSI should benefit all Member States without sectoral and regional pre-allocation, and should also be consistent with ongoing regional or local investment initiatives; emphasises that EFSI funding should also benefit small-scale projects.

    Furthermore, it recommended that Member States designate national promotional banks and closer cooperation between the EIB and national promotional banks, financial institutions and investment platforms, in order to pool and share expertise and know-how as well as to better align EIB actions with Member States’ policy priorities.

    Members recalled that the EFSI guarantee was meant to enable the EIB to take more risks while maintaining its triple-A rating. They stressed that they will be extremely vigilant in monitoring compliance with this criterion.

    In addition, the report called on the EIB:

    • to seriously assess the financial, social and environmental impact of the Project Bonds Initiative;
    • to update the external dimension of EIB interventions by paying particular attention to third countries and regions outside the EU suffering from conflict and extreme poverty and continuing to actively promote sustainable growth in developing countries; Members encouraged the EIB to develop and deploy the necessary comprehensive approach in response to the severe challenges generated by the flow of migrants to Europe;
    • to enhance the EIB’s governance, transparency and control framework.

    The EIB is called on to: i) to update its policies in the context of the ex-ante assessments of undertakings which are the subject of judicial investigations, as well as policies on anti-money laundering and on combating the financing of terrorism and organised crime; ii) guarantee maximum transparency and publicity regarding the system of contracts and subcontracts; iii) to develop more stringent rules on conflicts of interest; iv) to ensure that companies participating in projects co-financed by the EIB should be required to adhere to the principle of equal pay and pay transparency and to the principle of gender equality.

activities/3
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0050&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0050/2016
activities/2
date
2016-03-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/1/date
Old
2016-04-11T00:00:00
New
2016-04-28T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-03-07T00:00:00
New
2016-04-11T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
CZARNECKI Ryszard
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
STAES Bart
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
KAPPEL Barbara
activities/1/date
Old
2016-02-01T00:00:00
New
2016-03-07T00:00:00
committees/1/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/1/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
STAES Bart
committees/1/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
KAPPEL Barbara
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
DLABAJOVÁ Martina
activities/0/committees/2/date
2015-05-11T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
activities/1
date
2016-02-01T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/1/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
DLABAJOVÁ Martina
committees/2/date
2015-05-11T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
activities/0/committees/3/date
2015-06-15T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick
committees/3/date
2015-06-15T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick
activities/0/committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
activities/0/committees/3/date
2015-06-17T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
committees/3/date
2015-06-17T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
activities/0/committees/1/date
2015-06-16T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: PIRINSKI Georgi
activities/0/committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
committees/1/date
2015-06-16T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: PIRINSKI Georgi
committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
activities
  • date: 2015-06-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-06-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-06-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/03637
reference
2015/2127(INI)
title
European Investment Bank (EIB) - Annual report 2014
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.40.07 European Investment Bank