Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | VAUGHAN Derek ( S&D) | DEUTSCH Tamás ( PPE), VISTISEN Anders ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | LA VIA Giovanni ( PPE) | Julie GIRLING ( ECR), Benedek JÁVOR ( Verts/ALE), Karin KADENBACH ( S&D), Jasenko SELIMOVIC ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the in European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in respect of the budget for the financial year 2014.
NON LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2016/1522 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2014.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2014.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 28 April 2016 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 28 April 2016).
Amongst Parliament’s main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, it called on those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including the Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks of declarations of financial interests . It reiterated its call for the Authority to apply a two-year cooling-off period on all material interests related to the companies it regulates while welcoming its independence and conflicts of interest policy concerning expert groups.
The European Parliament decided by 415 votes to 216, with 9 abstentions, to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2014. The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex V, Article 5 (1)(a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Authority’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 472 votes to 162 with 9 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Authority’s financial statements : Parliament noted its final budget for the financial year 2014 was EUR 79 701 222, representing an increase of 2.11 % compared to 2013. Budget and financial management : Parliament noted that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2014 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.69 %, representing an increase of 0.86 % compared with 2013.
Parliament also made a series of observations regarding contract award, recruitment and internal audit and control procedures.
On the issue of conflicts of interest , Parliament noted that the Authority launched a project to modify the way it screens and processes the annual declarations of interest in order to ensure better coherence and overall compliance with its rules on declarations of interest. Furthermore, it noted that this new system, scheduled to be completed in the course of 2016, foresees centralised screening of the annual declarations of interest and transfer of responsibility from the Authority’s scientific departments to its legal and regulatory department.
It noted with concern that in order to attain both working with the top academics in the industry and having the most effective conflicts of interest policy possible, the Authority uses a system to assess the experts’ interests which takes into account the role of the experts and the mandate of the scientific working group or panel of which the expert would be a member against a number of different criteria.
It observed that, during 2014, the Authority received a number of contributions on independence-related issues from stakeholders and non-governmental organisations and that these contributed to the review of implementing rules for the independence policy . Members favour a holistic approach to the question of conflicts of interest in the Authority.
Parliament reminded the Authority of the European Ombudsman's ruling stating that the Authority should revise its conflict of interest rules to ensure that those experts who work for academia declare all relevant information to the Authority. It is of the opinion that if this would affect around one third of the experts as stated by the Authority, then the Authority should dedicate special attention to the issue and work on specific measures together with the concerned academic institutions to safeguard the integrity of both institutions.
Cooling-off period : Parliament reiterated its call on the Authority to apply a two-year cooling-off period. It does not accept the Authority's justification for its refusal to implement the discharge authority's repeated demands of establishing such a two-year cooling-off period on all material interests related to the companies it regulates.
Parliament pointed out that, in 2013, of the 29 statutory staff members that left the employment at the Authority, three went to the chemical/pharmaceutical sector with a range of restrictions put in place for these individuals. It acknowledged that the Authority considers that a clear legal and governance framework on revolving doors is already in place.
Lastly, it noted with satisfaction that the Authority no longer accepts anonymised interests and has withdrawn this option for experts when completing their declaration of interests.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2014.
The parliamentary committee calls on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2014.
Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2014, Members call on Parliament to approve the closure of the Authority’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
· Authority’s financial statements: Members note its final budget for the financial year 2014 was EUR 79 701 222, representing an increase of 2.11 % compared to 2013.
· Budget and financial management: Members note that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2014 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.69 %, representing an increase of 0.86 % compared with 2013.
Members also made a series of observations regarding contract award, recruitment and internal audit and control procedures.
On the issue of conflicts of interest , Members note that the Authority launched a project to modify the way it screens and processes the annual declarations of interest in order to ensure better coherence and overall compliance with its rules on declarations of interest. They note with concern that in order to attain both working with the top academics in the industry and having the most effective conflicts of interest policy possible, the Authority uses a system to assess the experts’ interests which takes into account the role of the experts and the mandate of the scientific working group or panel of which the expert would be a member against a number of different criteria. They observe that, during 2014, the Authority received a number of contributions on independence-related issues from stakeholders and non-governmental organisations and that these contributed to the review of implementing rules for the independence policy . Members favour a holistic approach to the question of conflicts of interest in the Authority.
Members point out that, in 2013, of the 29 statutory staff members that left the employment at the Authority, three went to the chemical/pharmaceutical sector with a range of restrictions put in place for these individuals. They acknowledge that the Authority considers that a clear legal and governance framework on revolving doors is already in place.
Lastly, they note with satisfaction that the Authority no longer accepts anonymised interests and has withdrawn this option for experts when completing their declaration of interests.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2014 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2014 of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2014, accompanied by the Authority's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2014.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Authority's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Authority's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the Council has made some observations which may be summarised as follows:
staff remuneration : the Council noted the Court's observation that the Authority had not complied with certain of the Staff Regulations' provisions on remuneration and welcomes the Authority's corrective action.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for the year 2014, together with the Authority’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Authority, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2014, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Authority’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Authority, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
s taff remunerations : the Court noted that in 2005 new EU Staff Regulations entered into force, including provisions that future remunerations of officials recruited before 1 May 2004 should not be less than under the previous EU Staff Regulations. The Court’s audit revealed that this was not complied with and, in the case of 8 of the 71 officials employed at that time, this led to a total underpayment of EUR 87 000 for the period 2005 to 2014.
The Authority’s reply :
staff remunerations : as regards the salary underpayments, EFSA specified that the treatment and calculation of the payroll costs are similar to other EU agencies externalised by the Authority to the PMO (department of the European Commission).
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Authority’s activities in 2014 . This is focused on the following:
Budget :
Budget : EUR 79.8 of which the Union contribution amounts to 100 %.
Activities :
scientific opinions and advice, as well as information on risks; evaluation of products, substances and claims subject to authorisation (in particular certain pesticides); data collection, scientific cooperation and networking; publications and scientific outputs supported by communication activities, press releases and web content.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU agencies : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the Agencies spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
EFSA : in 2014, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of EFSA's tasks : EFSA, which is located in Parma, was established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its main aim is to provide scientific opinions and scientific and technical support for the legislation and policies which have a direct or indirect impact on food and feed safety; EFSA's budget for the 2014 financial year : the Authority’s budget for 2014, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union, gives the following figures:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 80 million;
- paid : EUR 80 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 87 million;
- paid : EUR 78 million;
- carried-over : EUR 8 million.
Please refer also to the final accounts of the EFSA .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU agencies : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the Agencies spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
EFSA : in 2014, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of EFSA's tasks : EFSA, which is located in Parma, was established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its main aim is to provide scientific opinions and scientific and technical support for the legislation and policies which have a direct or indirect impact on food and feed safety; EFSA's budget for the 2014 financial year : the Authority’s budget for 2014, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union, gives the following figures:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 80 million;
- paid : EUR 80 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 87 million;
- paid : EUR 78 million;
- carried-over : EUR 8 million.
Please refer also to the final accounts of the EFSA .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0172/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0086/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.943
- Committee draft report: PE569.750
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05584/2016
- Committee opinion: PE571.774
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 409 09.12.2015, p. 0160
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0133/2015
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 409 09.12.2015, p. 0160 N8-0133/2015
- Committee opinion: PE571.774
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05584/2016
- Committee draft report: PE569.750
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.943
Activities
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norbert ERDŐS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GODDYN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renaud MUSELIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julia REID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0086/2016 - Derek Vaughan - Am 5 #
A8-0086/2016 - Derek Vaughan - Am 6 #
A8-0086/2016 - Derek Vaughan - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
50 |
2015/2176(DEC)
2015/12/22
ENVI
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that in 2014 an amount of EUR 80 547 505 had been made available to the European Food Safety Authority ('the Authority') through the general budget of the European Union
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Reiterates its call for the Authority to apply a two-year cooling-off period to all material interests related to the regulated sector, including research funding, consultancy contracts and decision- making positions;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 g (new) 8g. Calls on the Authority to examine the creation of a new status for "hearing experts" following the example of the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research Against Cancer;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the Authority should continue paying special attention to public opinion, and commit itself, as much as possible, to openness and transparency; welcomes, in this respect, the launch, in January 2013, of the transparency initiative; welcomes, in this context, the improved presentation and accessibility of information and documents on the Authority's homepage and other action taken, such as the risk assessment opinions and the impact they have on EU citizens, towards an "open EFSA"; encourages the Authority to further progress on this path;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union gives individuals the right to access public documents; reminds that scientific rigour is ensured best by transparency and accountability of the results; highlights that the Authority should make therefore all data used to reach any scientific conclusions public in a machine readable format so as to enable scientific scrutiny and constant progress;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Asks the responsible body of the Authority to implement the anti-fraud strategy as soon as possible;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Stresses that the aim of the data disclosure is to make reproducibility of the Authority's work possible and therefore, the steps taken towards process transparency in risk-assessment are a welcome first step, however data transparency should also be ensured;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Reminds the Authority that commercial confidentiality clauses must not be allowed to impair disclosure of data due to the overriding public interest of health and safety;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Stresses that experts in regulatory agencies must be paid for their work so as to enable their independence from the sector they regulate; calls on the Commission to provide the financial means for the Authority to pay experts to ensure independence;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is especially aware of the public interest in the decision-making process within the Authority
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Authority's efforts to implement corrective actions following the previous comments by the Court of Auditors,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Also welcomes the Authority's efforts to implement corrective actions following the comments made by the Parliament in the context of the 2013 discharge procedure, in the areas of financial controlling, internal
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Looks forward to results of the Authority's systemic review of its policy on independence and scientific decision- making process; welcomes the Authority's commitment to consider the publication of remunerations for experts' declared activities;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Welcomes the introduction of a system within the Authority to centralize the screening of the experts' declarations of interests; calls on the Authority to include in its policy the prohibition to work with any expert including Member States' delegated experts who do not properly and faithfully fill in that declaration; calls on the Authority to include in its policy an obligation for experts to inform the Authority of any eventual changes relating to the information included in that declaration while working for the Authority;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Calls on the Authority to commit itself to publish the names and the declarations of interests of experts and at the same time the scientific opinions as well as the full text version of all studies considered by the Authority;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Calls on the Authority to review its definition of conflict of interest in line with that of the Court of Auditors; is of the opinion that the current policy of the Authority to assess conflict of interest based on 66% of the agenda of a specific group is not a sophisticated and robust way to avoid potential conflicts of interests; calls on the Authority to take into account its mandate and not the panel in question when assessing whether there is a conflict of interest;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Reminds the Authority of the European Ombudsman's ruling stating that the Authority "should revise its conflict of interest rules" to ensure that those experts who work for academia declare all relevant information to the Authority; is of the opinion that if this would affect around one third of the experts as stated by the Authority, then the Authority should dedicate special attention to the issue and work on specific measures together with the concerned academic institutions to safeguard the integrity of both institutions;
source: 573.123
2016/03/04
CONT
33 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds the Authority that the first objective of its independence policy should be its reputation and therefore to make sure that the Authority is free from real or perceived conflicts of interests, in particular with the economic sectors it is de facto regulating;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Fails to understand why the Authority's Executive Director chose to appoint a food industry lobbyist as the Authority's new Communications Director, especially in the light of the rising public concerns on the independence of the Authority from regulated industry and previous requests from the discharge authority in particular in 2011 and the Article 11 of the EU Staff Regulations stating that "the appointing Authority shall examine whether the candidate has any personal interest such as to impair his independence or any other conflict of interest";
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges that the Authority launched a project to modify the way it screens and processes the annual declarations of interest in order to ensure better coherence and overall compliance with its rules on declarations of interest; notes, furthermore, that this new system, scheduled to be completed in the course of 2016, foresees centralised screening of the annual declarations of interest and transfer of responsibility from the Authority’s scientific departments to its legal and regulatory department; calls on the Authority to include in its policy the prohibition to work with any expert including Member States' delegated experts who do not properly and meaningfully fill in the declaration of interests(DoI); calls on the Authority to include in its policy an obligation for experts to inform the Authority of any eventual changes while working for the Authority;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Ascertains that, in order to attain both working with the top academics in the industry and having the most effective conflicts of interest policy possible, the Authority uses a system to assess the experts’ interests, which takes into account the role of the experts and the mandate of the scientific working group or panel of which the expert would be a member against a number of different criteria; notes, furthermore, that in 2016 the Authority will undertake an examination of the systems it has in place to detect conflicts of interest as part of the regular cycle of review of its independence policy; asks the Authority to inform the discharge authority about the outcomes of the review and the necessary adjustments to the procedures for selecting experts and checking their credentials;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Is of the opinion that the current independence policy of the Authority only banning evident and general conflicts of interests and solely assessing interest according to the specific manifest of the scientific panels and working group interests is not a sophisticated and robust way to avoid potential conflicts of interests; the Authority's current independence policy and implementing rules are neither ''robust'' nor ''sophisticated'' but remain costly and ineffective and its limited intention of implementing a cooling-off period with the scope of the panel mandate is largely insufficient;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for those EU institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including European Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks of declarations of financial interests;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Authority to review both its independence policy and related implementing rules in a way that guarantees that no relevant economic interests are falling within Authority's remit; reminds in this respect the Authority to the repeated requests from the discharge authority to take into account the mandate of the Authority and not the panel in question when assessing whether there is conflict of interest;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Reiterates its call for the Authority to apply a two-years cooling-off period; does not accept the Authority's justification for its refusal to implement the discharge authority's repeated demands of establishing a two-years cooling-off period on all material interests related to companies it regulates;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that, in order to improve its independence and conflicts of interest policy concerning expert groups, the Authority performed in 2014 an ex-post analysis of its rules on declarations of interests; notes with concern that despite the fact that this analysis led to a review and the adoption of a new
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Reminds the Authority of the European Ombudsman's ruling stating that the Authority "should revise its conflict of interest rules" to ensure that those experts who work for academia declare all relevant information to EFSA"; is of the opinion that if this would affect around one third of the experts as stated by the Authority, then the Authority should dedicate special attention to the issue and work on specific measures together with the concerned academic institutions to safeguard the integrity of both institutions;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the EU institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Encourages the EU institutions and agencies to better raise awareness of the conflict-of-interest policy among their officials, alongside ongoing awareness- raising activities and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance reviews; considers that a distinction should be made between elected representatives and public officials in the legislation on conflicts of interest; believes that there should also be such regulations in the Member States for public officials and civil servants involved in the administration and monitoring of EU subsidies; calls on the Commission to submit a draft legal basis on this matter;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Points out that several EU regulations including amongst others the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union gives individuals the right to access public documents; reminds the Authority that scientific rigour is ensured best by transparency and accountability of the results; highlights that the Authority should make therefore all data used to reach any scientific conclusions public in a machine readable format so as to enable scientific scrutiny and constant progress;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Acknowledges the Authority's efforts to improve the transparency of its work as well as the data it uses for it; acknowledges the existing legal limitations it faces for increasing data transparency; stresses that the aim of the disclosure is to make reproducibility of the Authority's work possible and therefore the steps taken towards process transparency in risk-assessment are a welcomed first step, however data transparency should also be ensured;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Reminds the Authority that commercial confidentiality clauses must not be allowed to impair disclosure of data due to the overriding public interest of health and safety; encourages it to interpret existing legal protection of commercial interest as restrictively as possible;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes note that the Authority's staff are legally bound to comply with the Staff Regulations1 regarding future employment; notes, in addition, that the assessment of staff’s future employment occurs on a systematic basis, and that if the
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Acknowledges that the Authority carried out an internal exercise to assess the impact of removing the possibility for experts to anonymise certain interests in their declarations of interest; notes from the Authority that the practice of anonymising interests has been used on very few occasions in the past; notes furthermore that for the latest renewal of panel members in 2015, no scientific experts chose to anonymise their interests; notes with satisfaction that the Authority no longer accepts anonymised interests and has withdrawn this option for experts when completing their declaration of interests; asks the Authority to check the declarations submitted by experts who were appointed before 2015 and who took advantage of the option of anonymising their interests;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Requests that all EU institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing, on an annual basis, information about senior officials who have left the EU administration, as well as a list of conflicts of interest; requests that the aforementioned independent structure assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest, and define clear cooling-off periods, which should cover at least the period for which transitional allowances are granted;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Is looking forward to results of the Authority's systemic review of its Policy on Independence and Scientific Decision- Making Process in 2016; welcomes the Authority's commitment to consider the publication of remunerations for experts' declared activities;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls on the Authority to make more extensive use of a new status for hearing experts following the example of the invited experts from World Health Organization's International Agency for Research Against Cancer; calls on the Authority to report to the discharge authority on use of hearing experts;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Stresses that experts in regulatory agencies must be paid for their work so as to enable their independence from the sector they regulate; calls on the Commission to provide the financial means for the Authority to pay external experts and develop in-house research to ensure independence;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Acknowledges that a large part of the difficulties the Authority is facing in securing its independence comes from the fact that the Commission consistently refuses to allocate it sufficient means of operation to work at defending food safety for EU citizens independently of the regulated industry's influence;
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Asks the EU institutions and bodies to apply strictly the measures pertaining to discretion and exclusion in respect of public procurement, with proper background checks being carried out in every instance, and to apply the exclusion criteria in order to debar companies in the event of any conflict of interest, this being essential to protect the EU's financial interests;
source: 576.943
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
VISTISEN Anders PrimdahlNew
VISTISEN Anders |
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2015-07-23T00:00:00New
2015-07-22T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.774&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-571774_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.750New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-569750_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.943New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-576943_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-04-27-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0086&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0086_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0172New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0172_EN.html |
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|