Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | CONT |
MARINESCU Marian-Jean ( PPE)
|
POCHE Miroslav ( S&D),
FITTO Raffaele ( ECR),
GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE),
ŠOLTES Igor ( Verts/ALE),
VALLI Marco ( EFDD),
KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF)
|
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2016/2154 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014.
CONTENT: with this Decision, the European Parliament granted the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (formerly the ENIAC Joint Undertaking and the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking) discharge in respect of the implementation of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2014.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 October 2016 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 October 2016).
Among Parliament’s main observations made in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, Parliament expressed concern about the irregularities noted by the Court of Auditors regarding the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities regarding audit of project cost claims.
Parliament noted, however, that the ECSEL JTI has corrected most of the irregularities noted above.
The European Parliament decided to grant the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (formerly the ENIAC Joint Undertaking and the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking) discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2014.
At the same time, Parliament approved the closure of ITER’s accounts.
Parliament also adopted by 501 votes to 107, with 17 abstentions, a resolution containing a number of recommendations that form an integral part of the discharge decision granted in plenary.
The principal observations made by Parliament may be summarised as follows:
In general : Parliament acknowledged the fact that the Joint Undertaking's accounts for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014 present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position on 26 June 2014. It expressed concern, however, that the Court of Auditors issued a qualified opinion for the fourth consecutive year regarding the regularity and legality of the underlying transactions on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (the “NFAs”) regarding audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex-post audits. It noted that the ECSEL JTI has invited national funding authorities to produce evidence that the implementation of the national procedures provide a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions. It was also noted that by the deadline of 30 June 2016, 76% of the NFAs so invited, representing 96.79% of joint Artemis and Joint Undertaking's spending, submitted the documents required and confirmed that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions . Grants : Parliament acknowledged that, according to the Joint Undertaking, national assurance procedures have been surveyed up to April 2015 for countries receiving 54.2 % of the Joint Undertaking grants. It commended the intention of the Joint Undertaking to continue this exercise by covering up to 92.7% of the total Joint Undertaking grants allocated and welcomed the assurance of the Joint Undertaking that the national procedures provide reasonable assurance with regard to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the second report by Marian-Jean MARINESCU (EPP, RO) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (formerly the ENIAC Joint Undertaking and the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking) discharge in respect of the implementation of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2014 .
In parallel, Members called on the Parliament to close the accounts of the Joint Undertaking for 2014.
They made a series of specific recommendations which may be summarised as follows:
In general : Members expressed concern that the Court of Auditors issued a qualified opinion for the fourth consecutive year regarding the regularity and legality of the underlying transactions on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (the “NFAs”) regarding audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex-post audits. They noted that the ECSEL JTI has invited national funding authorities to produce evidence that the implementation of the national procedures provide a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions. It was also noted that by the deadline of 30 June 2016, 76% of the NFAs so invited, representing 96.79% of joint Artemis and Joint Undertaking's spending, submitted the documents required and confirmed that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions . Grants : Members acknowledged that, according to the Joint Undertaking, national assurance procedures have been surveyed up to April 2015 for countries receiving 54.2 % of the Joint Undertaking grants. They commended the intention of the Joint Undertaking to continue this exercise by covering up to 92.7% of the total Joint Undertaking grants allocated and welcomed the assurance of the Joint Undertaking that the national procedures provide reasonable assurance with regard to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.
The European Parliament decided to postpone its decision to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of ENIAC’s budget for the financial year 2014.
It postponed the closure of the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (in accordance with Annex V, Article 5 (1)(b) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.
Parliament adopted by 595 votes to 40, with 0 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
General remark : Parliament recalled that the Artemis Joint Undertaking and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (ENIAC) were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (ECSEL JTI), which started its activity in June 2014 and will run for 10 years. Qualified opinion of the Court of Auditors : Parliament expressed c oncerned that the Court issued a qualified opinion for the fourth consecutive year regarding the regularity and legality of the underlying transactions on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (“the NFAs”) regarding audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex-post audits. It noted that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of the audit reports received from the NFAs even though the ECSEL JTI confirmed that its extensive assessment of the national assurance systems concluded that they can provide reasonable protection of the financial interests of the Joint Undertakings’ members. Parliament invited the ECSEL initiative to further strengthen its controls and the Court to collect additional and necessary documents and information as an alternative way to justify its opinion. Parliament also called on the ECSEL JTI, following the assessment of the procedures applied by the NFAs, to invite the NFAs to produce evidence that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions. Budget and financial management : Parliament noted that the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2014 included commitment appropriations of EUR 2 356 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 76 500 250. It noted that the initial budget for 2014 included only commitment appropriations for running costs amounting to EUR 2 300 000 and that the budget did not include commitment appropriations for operational activities, with a low utilisation rate for administrative commitment appropriations of 43 %. Parliament regretted the lack of information regarding in-kind and cash contributions. It called on the Court to include, in future reports, concrete provisions regarding the evaluation procedure and the level of in kind and cash paid contributions.
Lastly, Parliament issued a series of observations regarding the internal audit.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Marian-Jean MARINESCU (EPP, RO) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014.
The parliamentary committee calls on the European Parliament to postpone its decision to grant the Executive Director of the joint undertaking the discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking's budget for the financial year 2014 .
Accordingly, Members call on Parliament to delay the approval the closure of the joint undertaking’s accounts.
They made, however, a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted. They may be summarised as follows:
General remark: Members recall that the Artemis Joint Undertaking and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (ENIAC) were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (ECSEL JTI), which started its activity in June 2014 and will run for 10 years. Qualified opinion of the Court of Auditors: Members are concerned that the Court issued a qualified opinion for the fourth consecutive year regarding the regularity and legality of the underlying transactions on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (“the NFAs”) regarding audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex-post audits. They note that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of the audit reports received from the NFAs even though the ECSEL JTI confirmed that its extensive assessment of the national assurance systems concluded that they can provide reasonable protection of the financial interests of the Joint Undertakings’ members. Members invite the ECSEL initiative to further strengthen its controls and the Court to collect additional and necessary documents and information as an alternative way to justify its opinion. Budget and financial management: Members note that the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2014 included commitment appropriations of EUR 2 356 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 76 500 250. They note that the initial budget for 2014 included only commitment appropriations for running costs amounting to EUR 2 300 000 and that the budget did not include commitment appropriations for operational activities, with a low utilisation rate for administrative commitment appropriations of 43 %. Members regret the lack of information regarding in-kind and cash contributions. They call on the Court to include, in future reports, concrete provisions regarding the evaluation procedure and the level of in kind and cash paid contributions.
Lastly, Members issued a series of observations regarding the internal audit.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014 and the balance sheet as at 26 June 2014 of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, and the report by the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014.
The Council recalled that the ECSEL Joint Undertaking has replaced and succeeded the ENIAC Joint Undertaking and that discharge should be given to the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 26 June 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Joint Undertaking's Financial Rules, and that the underlying transactions for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The Council regretted, however, the Court's qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of the Joint Undertaking. In the Court's assessment, the Joint Undertaking's ex-post audit strategy does not provide sufficient assurance that this key control tool is functioning effectively. Even though the National Funding Authorities (NFAs), are responsible for ex-posts audits, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits nor was reliable information provided to enable the calculation of an error rate. The Council called on the ECSEL Joint Undertaking, as the successor Joint Undertaking, to ensure that the future audit strategies address these shortcomings.
It also made the following observations:
implementation rate : the Council noted the Court's observation concerning the low implementation rate of the administrative commitment appropriations due to the merger with the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking that took place in June 2014; financial regulation : the Council noted the late implementation of the new provisions of the Financial Regulation and the lack of amendment of the Joint Undertaking's Financial Rules due to the merger that took place in June 2014.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014, together with the Joint Undertaking’s replies.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2014; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Basis for a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : the Court noted that for this Joint Undertaking, the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the national funding authorities of the Member States (NFAs). However, ENIAC did not assess the quality of these audits. The Court performed an assessment of the audit strategies, including audit reports, of national funding authorities. It indicates that the methodologies used did not allow the Joint Undertaking to calculate a reliable weighted error rate nor a residual error rate. Therefore the Court feels that it is not possible to conclude whether ENIAC’s ex-post audits are functioning effectively. Hence, it gave a qualified opinion. The audit also revealed the following points:
financial and budgetary management : the utilisation rate for administrative commitment appropriations was 43 % because the merger took place in June whereas the budget was adopted for the whole year; procurement: the Court notes that the amount of appropriations committed for the calls for proposals was between 90% and 100%; internal control : the Joint Undertakings’ ex-post audit strategies are a key tool for assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. ECSEL’s administrative agreements do not include practical arrangements for ex-post audits, and the Court has given a qualified opinion on this point.
Cross-cutting remarks for all the Joint undertakings : the monitoring and reporting of research results is laid down in the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7). In the grant agreements signed with members and other beneficiaries, the Joint Undertakings have included specific provisions governing intellectual property rights and the dissemination of research activities and results. The implementation of these provisions is monitored by the Joint Undertakings at different stages of the funded projects and significant progress has been achieved in 2014. However, in order to meet the requirements of Horizon 2020 and to better contribute to the dissemination of FP7 research results, the Court considers that cooperation between the Joint Undertakings and the Commission must be developed as much as possible with special regard to the further integration of some of the Joint Undertakings’ data into the Commission’s systems.
The Court also indicates that there is room to improve procedures, in particular in the implementation of the ex-post audit strategy, and cooperation with the Commission as regards the integration of the research results.
Replies of the Joint Undertaking : the Joint Undertaking replies point by point to all the technical remarks made by the Court of Auditors. It indicates particularly, that the ECSEL Joint Undertaking undertook extensive assessments of the national assurance systems and concluded that the latter can provide a reasonable protection of the financial interests of the Joint Undertaking members. However, as indicated by the Court, the national methodologies do not allow the calculation of a weighted error rate nor a residual error rate for the projects launched under ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings.
With regard to the activities of the Joint Undertaking in 2014 , the report refers to the Joint Undertaking’s latest available annual activity report for 2013 available at the following address: www.ecsel.eu .
It should be noted that the budget for the Joint Undertaking was EUR 2 356 000 for commitments and EUR 76 500 250 for payments.
Remark: the ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings were merged to create ECSEL (the Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership Joint Undertaking.) The latter combines not only the Artemis JU on embedded systems and ENIAC JU on nanoelectronics, but also integrates work on implementing a research agenda for the development of key technologies for embedded computing systems across different application areas. ECSEL JU started its activities on 27 June 2014 and will run for 10 years.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU Joint Undertakings : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies and Joint Undertakings (JUs) do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the JUs spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
ENIAC : in 2014, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows:
description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking : the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, located in Brussels (BE), was set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 72/2008 . Its aim is to define a commonly agreed research agenda in the field of nano-electronics. It pursues this by pooling resources from the public and private sectors to support R&D activities in the form of projects; accounts of the JU : as of 26.6.2014, the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (along with the Artemis JU) were integrated in a new structure called ECSEL. At 31 December, 2014, the Commission held 95.47% ownership participation in ECSEL JU. The accounts of the Eniac JU were however regularly audited for the period up to the integration of Eniac in ECSEL.
Please also consult the final accounts of ENIAC Joint Undertaking .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU Joint Undertakings : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies and Joint Undertakings (JUs) do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the JUs spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
ENIAC : in 2014, the tasks and budget of the Joint Undertaking were as follows:
description of the tasks of the Joint Undertaking : the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, located in Brussels (BE), was set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 72/2008 . Its aim is to define a commonly agreed research agenda in the field of nano-electronics. It pursues this by pooling resources from the public and private sectors to support R&D activities in the form of projects; accounts of the JU : as of 26.6.2014, the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (along with the Artemis JU) were integrated in a new structure called ECSEL. At 31 December, 2014, the Commission held 95.47% ownership participation in ECSEL JU. The accounts of the Eniac JU were however regularly audited for the period up to the integration of Eniac in ECSEL.
Please also consult the final accounts of ENIAC Joint Undertaking .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0419/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0264/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE589.128
- Committee draft report: PE584.111
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0195/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0113/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.935
- Committee draft report: PE571.621
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05587/2016
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 422 17.12.2015, p. 0025
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0003/2016
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 422 17.12.2015, p. 0025 N8-0003/2016
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05587/2016
- Committee draft report: PE571.621
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.935
- Committee draft report: PE584.111
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE589.128
Activities
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Miroslav POCHE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Julia REID
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Tim AKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norbert ERDŐS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renaud MUSELIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margot PARKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sofia RIBEIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor Ivo STIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ángela VALLINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Auke ZIJLSTRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0113/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu - Résolution #
GUE/NGL
NIA8-0264/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu - Résolution #
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 19 |
2015/2202(DEC)
2016/03/04
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes that the Court's report includes a qualified opinion which is based on the lack of information necessary to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual error rate following the ex post audits by NFAs. Invites the European Court of Auditors to collect additional and necessary documents and information, for which the Joint Undertaking is not empowered to require, from the national audit bodies of the Member States and/or the national competent departments, in accordance with the provisions of Article 287(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Moreover, invites the Court to use this additional information as an alternative way to justify its opinion and to report to the discharge authority on its assessment of these additional elements.
source: 576.935
2016/09/06
CONT
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the Protocol (No. 1) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 b (new) - having regard to the Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of the audit reports received from the NFAs concerning the costs related to completed projects;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that, according to the Joint Undertaking, national assurance procedures have been surveyed up to April
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Citation 6 b (new) - having regard to the Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the Protocol (No. 1) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Citation 6 b (new) - having regard to the Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the Protocol (No. 1) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union,
source: 589.128
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0/date |
Old
2015-07-23T00:00:00New
2015-07-22T00:00:00 |
| events/5 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.621New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-571621_EN.html |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.935New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-576935_EN.html |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.111New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-584111_EN.html |
| docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.128New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-589128_EN.html |
| events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
| events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
| events/3 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-04-27-TOC_EN.html |
| events/6 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| events/8/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
| events/9 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161026&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-10-26-TOC_EN.html |
| events/11 |
|
| events/11 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0113&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0113_EN.html |
| events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0195New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0195_EN.html |
| events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0264&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0264_EN.html |
| events/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0419New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0419_EN.html |
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| commission |
|
| committees |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| procedure |
|