BETA


2015/2205(DEC) Discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT VAUGHAN Derek (icon: S&D S&D) DEUTSCH Tamás (icon: PPE PPE), VISTISEN Anders (icon: ECR ECR), ALI Nedzhmi (icon: ALDE ALDE), ŠOLTES Igor (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL CASA David (icon: PPE PPE) Amjad BASHIR (icon: ECR ECR), Marian HARKIN (icon: ALDE ALDE), Dominique MARTIN (icon: ENF ENF), Tamás MESZERICS (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Georgi PIRINSKI (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion LIBE MACOVEI Monica (icon: ECR ECR) Petr JEŽEK (icon: ALDE ALDE), Josep-Maria TERRICABRAS (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Traian UNGUREANU (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2016/04/28
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/04/28
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 519 votes to 118 with 3 abstentions, a resolution on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control.

Parliament reiterated the importance of the tasks performed by agencies, in particular of the regulatory agencies and those with the function of independent information collection. It noted from the 2014 annual audits that the agencies’ 2014 budget amounted to some EUR 1.9 billion, representing a decrease of about 5% compared to 2013 and about 1.4% of the Union’s general budget. It pointed out that approximately 63 % (EUR 1.2 billion) comes from Union funding, whereas the rest is income from fees or other sources.

Common approach and Commission's roadmap : while recalling that in July 2012, Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted a common approach on decentralised agencies, Members acknowledged the Commission’s progress report on the implementation of the Common Approach as well as the efforts made jointly by the Commission and the decentralised agencies, which resulted in demonstrable progress. This will ensure more balanced governance, improved efficiency and accountability and greater coherence.

Budget and financial management : Parliament recalled the need to apply the principle of annuality and that that an elevated level of carry-overs of committed appropriations remains the most frequent issue of the budgetary and financial management affecting agencies.

It noted with satisfaction that the final accounts of all decentralised agencies present fairly, in all material respects, their financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable financial regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission. For all decentralised agencies, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 were legal and regular in all material respects. It is concerned that certain agencies are partly financed by fees paid by industry, when these financial ties may affect their independence.

Cooperation among agencies : Parliament acknowledged that 93% of the agencies stated that they share services with other agencies and institutions and that 75% of the agencies have cooperation agreements, working arrangements and memoranda of understanding for cooperation with other agencies, institutions and Member States. The perspective of this approach is to result in cost savings and increased efficiency of agencies. It suggested locating any new agencies that may become necessary in close proximity to other agencies so that they may share services more easily.

It also acknowledged the benefits not only for agencies but also for the Commission to create synergies and pool procurement procedures within the framework of the Common Approach.

Human resources management : Parliament welcomed the fact that most agencies have already met or exceeded the 5% reduction based on their respective establishment plans. Parliament the Commission applied an additional levy of 5 % of staff to the agencies in order to create a redeployment pool from which it would allocate the posts to the agencies with new tasks entrusted to them or in a start-up phase. It called upon the Commission to run a SWOT analysis on the agencies’ mandates and annual work programmes in order to come to an informed decision on which Agencies need more staff and which do not.

It recalled its position on the budgetary procedure according to which, staff financed by fees paid by industry, and consequently not financed by the Union budget, should not be affected by the 1% yearly cut applied by the Union . It urged the Commission to treat the agencies financed primarily by the Union budget as a separate case and to put forward a specific framework for agencies financed mainly by industry, which should be in proportion to the services provided by the agency concerned.

Conflicts of interest and transparency : Parliament acknowledged that over 80% of all decentralised agencies have an anti-fraud strategy in place. It noted that the agencies have introduced a number of concrete measures and tools to address adequately the risks of actual and perceived conflicts of interest and to consider a strategy on how to get closer to Union citizens. Members called for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the EU institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest , the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries.

In this regard, Members noted with concern that some agencies are yet to adopt whistle-blowing guidelines and demands that all those Union institutions and agencies that have not yet done so urgently adopt them. They also called on the institutions and agencies to pay special attention to the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the soon-to-be-adopted Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure.

Parliament took note that 52% of the agencies use expert groups, scientific panels and committees and almost all of them take into account concerns raised by the European Ombudsman´s own-initiative inquiry (OI/6/2014/NF) opened on 12 May 2014 into their staffing policies for these groups.

It requested that all Union institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing, on an annual basis, information about senior officials who have left the service, as well as a list of conflicts of interest . It further requested that all Union institutions and agencies assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest. To underline the need to enhance integrity and improve the ethical framework, Parliament recommended better implementation of codes of conduct and ethical principles, so as to reinforce a common and effective culture of integrity for all Union institutions and agencies. In addition, it called for those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including the European Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks on declarations of financial interests.

Parliament made a series of general recommendations on improving the performance of the agencies in order to make their operations more effective, as well as more visible, particularly on-line. Overall, it called on the agencies to further strengthen their efforts and to improve their communication policies to expand their visibility through different social media tools.

In parallel, Parliament recalled that the Court of Auditors that the Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed in paragraph 54 of the Common Approach that all aspects of outsourced external audits "remain under the full responsibility of the [Court], which manages all administrative and procurement procedures required". It called on the Commission to confirm urgently that the Common Approach still applies. It deeply regretted that the new audit approach involving private sector auditors resulted in an 85 % increase in administrative burden on the agencies, equating to more than 13 000 additional hours or an average of 3.5 full time equivalents (FTEs) compared with the previous audit managed by the Court of Auditors. It called on the Court of Auditors to provide better guidance to private auditors so as significantly to reduce the augmented administrative burden.

Lastly, Parliament highlighted the need for agencies to adopt headquarter agreements and to improve their procedures and practices in matters of procurement and preservation of their financial interests.

Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/04/27
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/04/06
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control.

Members r eiterate the importance of the tasks performed by agencies, in particular of the regulatory agencies and those with the function of independent information collection. They note from the 2014 annual audits that the agencies’ 2014 budget amounted to some EUR 1.9 billion, representing a decrease of about 5% compared to 2013 and about 1.4% of the Union’s general budget. They point out that approximately 63 % (EUR 1.2 billion) comes from Union funding, whereas the rest is income from fees or other sources.

Common approach and Commission's roadmap : while recalling that in July 2012, Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted a common approach on decentralised agencies, Members acknowledge the Commission’s progress report on the implementation of the Common Approach as well as the efforts made jointly by the Commission and the decentralised agencies, which resulted in demonstrable progress. This will ensure more balanced governance, improved efficiency and accountability and greater coherence.

Budget and financial management : Members recall the need to apply the principle of annuality and that that an elevated level of carry-overs of committed appropriations remains the most frequent issue of the budgetary and financial management affecting agencies.

They note with satisfaction that the final accounts of all decentralised agencies present fairly, in all material respects, their financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable financial regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission. For all decentralised agencies, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 were legal and regular in all material respects. They are concerned that certain agencies are partly financed by fees paid by industry, when these financial ties may affect their independence.

Cooperation among agencies : Members acknowledge that 93% of the agencies stated that they share services with other agencies and institutions and that 75% of the agencies have cooperation agreements, working arrangements and memoranda of understanding for cooperation with other agencies, institutions and Member States. The perspective of this approach is to result in cost savings and increased efficiency of agencies. They suggest locating any new agencies that may become necessary in close proximity to other agencies so that they may share services more easily.

They also acknowledge the benefits not only for agencies but also for the Commission to create synergies and pool procurement procedures within the framework of the Common Approach.

Human resources management : Members welcome the fact that most agencies have already met or exceeded the 5% reduction based on their respective establishment plans. They recall Parliament's position on the budgetary procedure according to which, staff financed by fees paid by industry, and consequently not financed by the Union budget, should not be affected by the 1% yearly cut applied by the Union . They urge the Commission to treat the agencies financed primarily by the Union budget as a separate case and to put forward a specific framework for agencies financed mainly by industry, which should be in proportion to the services provided by the agency concerned.

Conflicts of interest and transparency : Members acknowledges that over 80% of all decentralised agencies have an anti-fraud strategy in place. They note that the agencies have introduced a number of concrete measures and tools to address adequately the risks of actual and perceived conflicts of interest and to consider a strategy on how to get closer to Union citizens. Members call for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the EU institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest , the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries.

In this regard, Members note with concern that some agencies are yet to adopt whistle-blowing guidelines and demands that all those Union institutions and agencies that have not yet done so urgently adopt them. They also call on the institutions and agencies to pay special attention to the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the soon-to-be-adopted Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure.

Members take note that 52% of the agencies use expert groups, scientific panels and committees and almost all of them take into account concerns raised by the European Ombudsman´s own-initiative inquiry (OI/6/2014/NF) opened on 12 May 2014 into their staffing policies for these groups.

They request that all Union institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing, on an annual basis, information about senior officials who have left the service, as well as a list of conflicts of interest . They further request that all Union institutions and agencies assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest. To underline the need to enhance integrity and improve the ethical framework, Members recommend better implementation of codes of conduct and ethical principles, so as to reinforce a common and effective culture of integrity for all Union institutions and agencies. In addition, they call for those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including the European Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks on declarations of financial interests.

Members made a series of general recommendations on improving the performance of the agencies in order to make their operations more effective, as well as more visible, particularly on-line. Overall, they called on the agencies to further strengthen their efforts and to improve their communication policies to expand their visibility through different social media tools.

Lastly, Members highlight the need for agencies to adopt headquarter agreements and to improve their procedures and practices in matters of procurement and preservation of their financial interests.

Documents
2016/04/04
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/03/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/02/04
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/01/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/11/19
   EP - MACOVEI Monica (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2015/10/05
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/09/09
   EP - CASA David (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2015/08/10
   EP - VAUGHAN Derek (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2015/07/23
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.

CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the agencies and bodies of the European Union as well as the Joint Undertakings.

The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.

On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and joint undertakings of the European Union.

Discharge procedure of the EU Joint Undertakings : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised and decentralised agencies.

The following is a list of the decentralised agencies:

- European Maritime Safety Agency

- European Food Safety Authority

- European Medicines Agency

- European Railway Agency

- European GNSS Supervisory Authority

- European Chemicals Agency

- European Fisheries Control Agency

- Fusion for Energy (European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy)

- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction

- Eurojust

- European Police College (CEPOL)

- European Institute for Gender Equality

- European Police Office (EUROPOL)

- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work

- European Aviation Safety Agency

- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

- European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)

- European Environment Agency

- European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights

- European Centre for the Development of Vocational training (CEDEFOP)

- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

- European Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators

- Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union

- European Banking Authority

- European Securities and Markets Authority

- European Asylum Support Office

- European Training Foundation

- Office for the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communication

- European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

- European Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at External Borders of the Member States of the EU (Frontex)

- EU Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

- EU-LISA (European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice)

- European Institute of Innovation and Technology.

Other joint ventures include:

- ITER and F4E

- Galileo (GSA)

- SESAR

- IMI 2

- FCH 2

- ECSEL (including the former JUs Atermis and ENIAC)

- Clean Sky 2.

The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of the agencies and the JUs since within the EU budget a separate budget for each JU is established (please refer to the specific discharge procedures).

This procedure aims to define how the budget of the agencies was spent and implemented in 2014 and the implementing conditions to ensure the best possible performance.

2015/07/22
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.

CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the agencies and bodies of the European Union as well as the Joint Undertakings.

The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.

On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and joint undertakings of the European Union.

Discharge procedure of the EU Joint Undertakings : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised and decentralised agencies.

The following is a list of the decentralised agencies:

- European Maritime Safety Agency

- European Food Safety Authority

- European Medicines Agency

- European Railway Agency

- European GNSS Supervisory Authority

- European Chemicals Agency

- European Fisheries Control Agency

- Fusion for Energy (European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy)

- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction

- Eurojust

- European Police College (CEPOL)

- European Institute for Gender Equality

- European Police Office (EUROPOL)

- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work

- European Aviation Safety Agency

- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

- European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)

- European Environment Agency

- European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights

- European Centre for the Development of Vocational training (CEDEFOP)

- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

- European Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators

- Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union

- European Banking Authority

- European Securities and Markets Authority

- European Asylum Support Office

- European Training Foundation

- Office for the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communication

- European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

- European Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at External Borders of the Member States of the EU (Frontex)

- EU Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

- EU-LISA (European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice)

- European Institute of Innovation and Technology.

Other joint ventures include:

- ITER and F4E

- Galileo (GSA)

- SESAR

- IMI 2

- FCH 2

- ECSEL (including the former JUs Atermis and ENIAC)

- Clean Sky 2.

The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of the agencies and the JUs since within the EU budget a separate budget for each JU is established (please refer to the specific discharge procedures).

This procedure aims to define how the budget of the agencies was spent and implemented in 2014 and the implementing conditions to ensure the best possible performance.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0080/2016 - Derek Vaughan - Résolution #

2016/04/28 Outcome: +: 519, -: 118, 0: 3
DE IT ES RO FR HU AT CZ NL PT BG SE BE IE LT HR EL SK LV EE SI PL MT CY LU FI DK GB
Total
81
62
42
25
68
19
18
21
25
16
16
14
20
10
9
10
17
13
8
6
6
46
6
5
4
7
11
55
icon: PPE PPE
193
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
159

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2
AmendmentsDossier
44 2015/2205(DEC)
2015/12/15 EMPL 11 amendments...
source: 573.030
2016/01/22 EMPL 1 amendments...
source: 575.328
2016/01/27 LIBE 6 amendments...
source: 575.352
2016/03/04 CONT 26 amendments...
source: 576.974

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/1/name
Old
VISTISEN Anders Primdahl
New
VISTISEN Anders
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/3
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/4
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/5
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/6
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: CASA David date: 2015-09-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/7
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/8
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/9
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/10
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: CASA David date: 2015-09-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/11
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/12
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/13
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/14
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/15
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica date: 2015-11-19T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/16
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica date: 2015-11-19T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/17
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/18
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/19
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
docs/0
date
2015-07-23T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2015-07-23T00:00:00
New
2015-07-22T00:00:00
committees/0/shadows/3
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.662&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-571662_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.770
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-569770_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.095&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-575095_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.974
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-576974_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2016-04-06T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0080_EN.html title: A8-0080/2016
summary
events/3
date
2016-04-06T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0080_EN.html title: A8-0080/2016
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-04-27-TOC_EN.html
events/6
date
2016-04-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0159_EN.html title: T8-0159/2016
summary
events/6
date
2016-04-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0159_EN.html title: T8-0159/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek date: 2015-08-10T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2015-08-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: CASA David date: 2015-09-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-09-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CASA David group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica date: 2015-11-19T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2015-11-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0080&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0080_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0159
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0159_EN.html
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
committees
  • type: Responsible Committee body: EP associated: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT date: 2015-08-10T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D shadows: name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE name: VISTISEN Anders Primdahl group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR name: ALI Nedzhmi group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE name: DE JONG Dennis group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL name: ŠOLTES Igor group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: VALLI Marco group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD name: KAPPEL Barbara group: Europe of Nations and Freedom abbr: ENF
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL date: 2015-09-09T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: CASA David group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE date: 2015-11-19T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: MACOVEI Monica group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Womens Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI opinion: False
docs
  • date: 2016-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.662&secondRef=02 title: PE571.662 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.770 title: PE569.770 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.095&secondRef=03 title: PE575.095 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.974 title: PE576.974 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-07-23T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0377/COM_COM(2015)0377_EN.pdf title: COM(2015)0377 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2015&nu_doc=0377 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure. CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the agencies and bodies of the European Union as well as the Joint Undertakings. The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based. On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and joint undertakings of the European Union. Discharge procedure of the EU Joint Undertakings : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised and decentralised agencies. The following is a list of the decentralised agencies: - European Maritime Safety Agency - European Food Safety Authority - European Medicines Agency - European Railway Agency - European GNSS Supervisory Authority - European Chemicals Agency - European Fisheries Control Agency - Fusion for Energy (European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy) - European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction - Eurojust - European Police College (CEPOL) - European Institute for Gender Equality - European Police Office (EUROPOL) - European Agency for Safety and Health at Work - European Aviation Safety Agency - European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) - European Environment Agency - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights - European Centre for the Development of Vocational training (CEDEFOP) - European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority - European Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators - Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union - European Banking Authority - European Securities and Markets Authority - European Asylum Support Office - European Training Foundation - Office for the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communication - European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions - European Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at External Borders of the Member States of the EU (Frontex) - EU Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) - EU-LISA (European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice) - European Institute of Innovation and Technology. Other joint ventures include: - ITER and F4E - Galileo (GSA) - SESAR - IMI 2 - FCH 2 - ECSEL (including the former JUs Atermis and ENIAC) - Clean Sky 2. The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of the agencies and the JUs since within the EU budget a separate budget for each JU is established (please refer to the specific discharge procedures). This procedure aims to define how the budget of the agencies was spent and implemented in 2014 and the implementing conditions to ensure the best possible performance.
  • date: 2015-10-05T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-04T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-06T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0080&language=EN title: A8-0080/2016 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control. Members r eiterate the importance of the tasks performed by agencies, in particular of the regulatory agencies and those with the function of independent information collection. They note from the 2014 annual audits that the agencies’ 2014 budget amounted to some EUR 1.9 billion, representing a decrease of about 5% compared to 2013 and about 1.4% of the Union’s general budget. They point out that approximately 63 % (EUR 1.2 billion) comes from Union funding, whereas the rest is income from fees or other sources. Common approach and Commission's roadmap : while recalling that in July 2012, Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted a common approach on decentralised agencies, Members acknowledge the Commission’s progress report on the implementation of the Common Approach as well as the efforts made jointly by the Commission and the decentralised agencies, which resulted in demonstrable progress. This will ensure more balanced governance, improved efficiency and accountability and greater coherence. Budget and financial management : Members recall the need to apply the principle of annuality and that that an elevated level of carry-overs of committed appropriations remains the most frequent issue of the budgetary and financial management affecting agencies. They note with satisfaction that the final accounts of all decentralised agencies present fairly, in all material respects, their financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable financial regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission. For all decentralised agencies, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 were legal and regular in all material respects. They are concerned that certain agencies are partly financed by fees paid by industry, when these financial ties may affect their independence. Cooperation among agencies : Members acknowledge that 93% of the agencies stated that they share services with other agencies and institutions and that 75% of the agencies have cooperation agreements, working arrangements and memoranda of understanding for cooperation with other agencies, institutions and Member States. The perspective of this approach is to result in cost savings and increased efficiency of agencies. They suggest locating any new agencies that may become necessary in close proximity to other agencies so that they may share services more easily. They also acknowledge the benefits not only for agencies but also for the Commission to create synergies and pool procurement procedures within the framework of the Common Approach. Human resources management : Members welcome the fact that most agencies have already met or exceeded the 5% reduction based on their respective establishment plans. They recall Parliament's position on the budgetary procedure according to which, staff financed by fees paid by industry, and consequently not financed by the Union budget, should not be affected by the 1% yearly cut applied by the Union . They urge the Commission to treat the agencies financed primarily by the Union budget as a separate case and to put forward a specific framework for agencies financed mainly by industry, which should be in proportion to the services provided by the agency concerned. Conflicts of interest and transparency : Members acknowledges that over 80% of all decentralised agencies have an anti-fraud strategy in place. They note that the agencies have introduced a number of concrete measures and tools to address adequately the risks of actual and perceived conflicts of interest and to consider a strategy on how to get closer to Union citizens. Members call for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the EU institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest , the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries. In this regard, Members note with concern that some agencies are yet to adopt whistle-blowing guidelines and demands that all those Union institutions and agencies that have not yet done so urgently adopt them. They also call on the institutions and agencies to pay special attention to the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the soon-to-be-adopted Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. Members take note that 52% of the agencies use expert groups, scientific panels and committees and almost all of them take into account concerns raised by the European Ombudsman´s own-initiative inquiry (OI/6/2014/NF) opened on 12 May 2014 into their staffing policies for these groups. They request that all Union institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing, on an annual basis, information about senior officials who have left the service, as well as a list of conflicts of interest . They further request that all Union institutions and agencies assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest. To underline the need to enhance integrity and improve the ethical framework, Members recommend better implementation of codes of conduct and ethical principles, so as to reinforce a common and effective culture of integrity for all Union institutions and agencies. In addition, they call for those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including the European Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks on declarations of financial interests. Members made a series of general recommendations on improving the performance of the agencies in order to make their operations more effective, as well as more visible, particularly on-line. Overall, they called on the agencies to further strengthen their efforts and to improve their communication policies to expand their visibility through different social media tools. Lastly, Members highlight the need for agencies to adopt headquarter agreements and to improve their procedures and practices in matters of procurement and preservation of their financial interests.
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26989&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0159 title: T8-0159/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 519 votes to 118 with 3 abstentions, a resolution on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control. Parliament reiterated the importance of the tasks performed by agencies, in particular of the regulatory agencies and those with the function of independent information collection. It noted from the 2014 annual audits that the agencies’ 2014 budget amounted to some EUR 1.9 billion, representing a decrease of about 5% compared to 2013 and about 1.4% of the Union’s general budget. It pointed out that approximately 63 % (EUR 1.2 billion) comes from Union funding, whereas the rest is income from fees or other sources. Common approach and Commission's roadmap : while recalling that in July 2012, Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted a common approach on decentralised agencies, Members acknowledged the Commission’s progress report on the implementation of the Common Approach as well as the efforts made jointly by the Commission and the decentralised agencies, which resulted in demonstrable progress. This will ensure more balanced governance, improved efficiency and accountability and greater coherence. Budget and financial management : Parliament recalled the need to apply the principle of annuality and that that an elevated level of carry-overs of committed appropriations remains the most frequent issue of the budgetary and financial management affecting agencies. It noted with satisfaction that the final accounts of all decentralised agencies present fairly, in all material respects, their financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable financial regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission. For all decentralised agencies, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 were legal and regular in all material respects. It is concerned that certain agencies are partly financed by fees paid by industry, when these financial ties may affect their independence. Cooperation among agencies : Parliament acknowledged that 93% of the agencies stated that they share services with other agencies and institutions and that 75% of the agencies have cooperation agreements, working arrangements and memoranda of understanding for cooperation with other agencies, institutions and Member States. The perspective of this approach is to result in cost savings and increased efficiency of agencies. It suggested locating any new agencies that may become necessary in close proximity to other agencies so that they may share services more easily. It also acknowledged the benefits not only for agencies but also for the Commission to create synergies and pool procurement procedures within the framework of the Common Approach. Human resources management : Parliament welcomed the fact that most agencies have already met or exceeded the 5% reduction based on their respective establishment plans. Parliament the Commission applied an additional levy of 5 % of staff to the agencies in order to create a redeployment pool from which it would allocate the posts to the agencies with new tasks entrusted to them or in a start-up phase. It called upon the Commission to run a SWOT analysis on the agencies’ mandates and annual work programmes in order to come to an informed decision on which Agencies need more staff and which do not. It recalled its position on the budgetary procedure according to which, staff financed by fees paid by industry, and consequently not financed by the Union budget, should not be affected by the 1% yearly cut applied by the Union . It urged the Commission to treat the agencies financed primarily by the Union budget as a separate case and to put forward a specific framework for agencies financed mainly by industry, which should be in proportion to the services provided by the agency concerned. Conflicts of interest and transparency : Parliament acknowledged that over 80% of all decentralised agencies have an anti-fraud strategy in place. It noted that the agencies have introduced a number of concrete measures and tools to address adequately the risks of actual and perceived conflicts of interest and to consider a strategy on how to get closer to Union citizens. Members called for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the EU institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest , the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries. In this regard, Members noted with concern that some agencies are yet to adopt whistle-blowing guidelines and demands that all those Union institutions and agencies that have not yet done so urgently adopt them. They also called on the institutions and agencies to pay special attention to the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the soon-to-be-adopted Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. Parliament took note that 52% of the agencies use expert groups, scientific panels and committees and almost all of them take into account concerns raised by the European Ombudsman´s own-initiative inquiry (OI/6/2014/NF) opened on 12 May 2014 into their staffing policies for these groups. It requested that all Union institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing, on an annual basis, information about senior officials who have left the service, as well as a list of conflicts of interest . It further requested that all Union institutions and agencies assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest. To underline the need to enhance integrity and improve the ethical framework, Parliament recommended better implementation of codes of conduct and ethical principles, so as to reinforce a common and effective culture of integrity for all Union institutions and agencies. In addition, it called for those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including the European Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks on declarations of financial interests. Parliament made a series of general recommendations on improving the performance of the agencies in order to make their operations more effective, as well as more visible, particularly on-line. Overall, it called on the agencies to further strengthen their efforts and to improve their communication policies to expand their visibility through different social media tools. In parallel, Parliament recalled that the Court of Auditors that the Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed in paragraph 54 of the Common Approach that all aspects of outsourced external audits "remain under the full responsibility of the [Court], which manages all administrative and procurement procedures required". It called on the Commission to confirm urgently that the Common Approach still applies. It deeply regretted that the new audit approach involving private sector auditors resulted in an 85 % increase in administrative burden on the agencies, equating to more than 13 000 additional hours or an average of 3.5 full time equivalents (FTEs) compared with the previous audit managed by the Court of Auditors. It called on the Court of Auditors to provide better guidance to private auditors so as significantly to reduce the augmented administrative burden. Lastly, Parliament highlighted the need for agencies to adopt headquarter agreements and to improve their procedures and practices in matters of procurement and preservation of their financial interests.
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2015/2205(DEC)
title
Discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control
subject
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
stage_reached
Procedure completed
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/04288