BETA


2015/2234(INI) EU/Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET BROK Elmar (icon: PPE PPE) BETTINI Goffredo Maria (icon: S&D S&D), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: ECR ECR), KYUCHYUK Ilhan (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2

Events

2016/06/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/06/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 556 votes to 62 with 59 abstentions , a non legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part.

Parliament recalled that in terms of national human rights legislation, the Philippines are a role model for other countries in the region, having ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 2011. It also recalled that the EU is the Philippines' fourth largest trading partner and fourth largest export market, accounting for 11.56 % of all Philippine exports.

Whilst welcoming the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation with the Philippines, Parliament called on the EU to continue providing financial support and capacity-building assistance to the Philippines for poverty alleviation and the implementation of policies to tackle climate change.

At the same time, it called on the Philippines to foster further progress in the elimination of corruption and the promotion of human rights.

Fight against terrorism : Parliament commended the Philippines for having been part of the international counterterrorism coalition since 2001, but expressed concern over the continued reports of severe human rights violations by the Philippine military in the conduct of counter-insurgency measures. It pointed out that the Abu Sayyaf group is accused of carrying out the worst acts of terrorism committed in the Philippines, including deadly bombings such as the attack on a ferry in Manila in 2004 in which more than 100 people were killed. It also stressed that there are growing concerns that ISIS will win over affiliated groups in South-East Asia. At the same time, it condemned the massacre of 24 December 2015 of Christian farmers by separatist rebels in Mindanao.

Parliament appreciated the commitments made by the Philippine Government to achieve a peace process for Mindanao but deeply regretted the fact that the Mindanao Peace Agreement was not adopted by the Philippine Congress. It also welcomed the initiative by the Philippine NGO PeaceTech of putting Christian and Muslim schoolchildren in touch with each other via Skype in an effort to foster contact between the two communities. Members called for the EU and its Member States to engage with the Philippines in order to exchange intelligence, cooperate and provide support for the government’s capacity- building in the international fight against terrorism and extremism in relation to fundamental rights and the rule of law.

Human trafficking : Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to support the government, and notably the Inter-Agency Council against Trafficking (IACAT), in the efforts being made to enhance assistance and support for victims, to put into place efficient law enforcement measures, and improve the legal avenues of work labour migration. The EU and its Member States were asked to engage with the Philippines and provide support for the government's capacity- building.

South China Sea: Parliament noted that the Philippines are strategically located in the proximity of major international shipping and air traffic routes in the South China Sea. They recalled their serious concerns over the tension in the South China Sea . Members were particularly concerned at the massive scale of China’s current activities in the area, including building military facilities, ports, and at least one airstrip. They urged all parties in the disputed area to refrain from unilateral and provocative actions and to resolve the disputes peacefully. Members supported all steps that will enable the South China Sea to become a ‘sea of peace and cooperation ‘and all endeavours to ensure that the parties agree on a code of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question.

GSP+: Parliament called on the Philippines, as one of the countries having been granted GSP+ status by the EU, to ensure effective implementation of all the core international conventions relating to human and labour rights, the environment and good governance. Recognising that the Philippines have strengthened their human rights legislation, Members recalled that under the GSP+ beneficiaries will have to prove that they are implementing their obligations concerning human rights, labour, environmental and governance standards. Parliament took note of the GSP+ country assessment of the Philippines, particularly as regards the ratification of all seven UN human rights conventions relevant to the EU's GSP+. However, it highlighted the work that still needs to be done for implementation.

Free Trade Agreement : Parliament welcomed the agreement of 22 December 2015 to open negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the Philippines, and recalled, at the same time, that the Commission and the Philippine authorities should ensure high standards on human rights, labour and the environment. Such an FTA should serve as a building block towards a region-to-region EU-ASEAN agreement on trade and investment. It encouraged the Philippines to continue improving the investment climate, including the FDI environment, by increasing transparency and good governance and implementing the UN guiding principles on business and human rights.

Filipino seamen : Parliament took note that 800 000 Filipinos are living in the EU and that Filipino seamen working on EU-registered ships send remittances to the Philippines amounting to EUR 3 billion per annum. It recalled that the majority of the crew on many non-Community flagged vessels calling at European ports are Filipino and noted as well the harsh and inhuman working conditions in which many of these seafarers live. It called on Member States not to allow these vessels to be received in European ports when the working conditions on board contravene the labour rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It wanted non-Community flagged vessels to guarantee their crews’ working conditions in accordance with international legislation and the rules laid down by the ILO and the International Maritime Organisation.

Follow-up and transparency: lastly, Parliament called for regular exchanges between the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Parliament, to allow Parliament to follow up on the implementation of the Framework Agreement and the achievement of its objectives.

Documents
2016/06/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/06/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/04/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part.

Members recalled that in terms of international and national human rights legislation, the Philippines are a role model for other countries in the region, having ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 2011. They also recalled that the EU is the Philippines' fourth largest trading partner and fourth largest export market, accounting for 11.56 % of all Philippine exports.

Whilst welcoming the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation with the Philippines, Members called on the EU to continue providing financial support and capacity-building assistance to the Philippines for poverty alleviation and the implementation of policies to tackle climate change.

At the same time, they called on the Philippines to foster further progress in the elimination of corruption and the promotion of human rights.

Fight against terrorism : Members commended the Philippines for having been part of the international counterterrorism coalition since 200, but expressed concern over the continued reports of severe human rights violations by the Philippine military in the conduct of counter-insurgency measures. They pointed out that the Abu Sayyaf group is accused of carrying out the worst acts of terrorism committed in the Philippines, including deadly bombings such as the attack on a ferry in Manila in 2004 in which more than 100 people were killed.

They also stressed that there are growing concerns that ISIS will win over affiliated groups in South-East Asia. At the same time, they condemned the massacre of 24 December 2015 of Christian farmers by separatist rebels in Mindanao.

Human trafficking : the committee called on the EU and its Member States to support the government, and notably the Inter-Agency Council against Trafficking (IACAT), in the efforts being made to enhance assistance and support for victims, to put into place efficient law enforcement measures, and improve the legal avenues of work labour migration. The EU and its Member States were asked to engage with the Philippines and provide support for the government's capacity- building.

South China Sea: Members noted that the Philippines are strategically located in the proximity of major international shipping and air traffic routes in the South China Sea. They recalled their serious concerns over the tension in the South China Sea . Members were particularly concerned at the massive scale of China’s current activities in the area, including building military facilities, ports, and at least one airstrip. They urged all parties in the disputed area to refrain from unilateral and provocative actions and to resolve the disputes peacefully. Members supported all steps that will enable the South China Sea to become a ‘sea of peace and cooperation ‘and all endeavours to ensure that the parties agree on a code of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question.

GSP+: the committee called on the Philippines, as one of the countries having been granted GSP+ status by the EU, to ensure effective implementation of all the core international conventions relating to human and labour rights, the environment and good governance. Recognising that the Philippines have strengthened their human rights legislation, Members recalled that under the GSP+ beneficiaries will have to prove that they are implementing their obligations concerning human rights, labour, environmental and governance standards. They took note of the GSP+ country assessment of the Philippines, particularly as regards the ratification of all seven UN human rights conventions relevant to the EU's GSP+. However, they highlighted the work that still needs to be done for implementation.

Free Trade Agreement : Members welcomed the agreement of 22 December 2015 to open negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the Philippines, and recalled, at the same time, that the Commission and the Philippine authorities should ensure high standards on human rights, labour and the environment. Such an FTA should serve as a building block towards a region-to-region EU-ASEAN agreement on trade and investment.

Filipino seamen : Members took note that 800 000 Filipinos are living in the EU and that Filipino seamen working on EU-registered ships send remittances to the Philippines amounting to EUR 3 billion per annum. They recalled that the majority of the crew on many non-Community flagged vessels calling at European ports are Filipino and noted as well the harsh and inhuman working conditions in which many of these seafarers live. They called on Member States not to allow these vessels to be received in European ports when the working conditions on board contravene the labour rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Lastly, they wanted non-Community flagged vessels to guarantee their crews’ working conditions in accordance with international legislation and the rules laid down by the ILO and the International Maritime Organisation.

Documents
2016/04/19
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/02/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/10/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/06/22
   EP - BROK Elmar (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0143/2016 - Elmar Brok - Résolution #

2016/06/08 Outcome: +: 556, -: 62, 0: 59
DE PL IT ES RO GB BE HU AT BG FR CZ PT NL SE DK SK FI HR LT SI LV LU IE MT EE CY EL
Total
92
47
65
49
28
48
19
19
18
17
69
21
21
24
18
13
12
11
11
10
8
7
6
10
6
5
5
18
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
51

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
AmendmentsDossier
88 2015/2234(INI)
2016/02/29 AFET 88 amendments...
source: 577.014

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/2/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-06-07-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar date: 2015-06-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar date: 2015-06-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.752
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-567752_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.014
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-577014_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/1
date
2016-04-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0143_EN.html title: A8-0143/2016
summary
events/1
date
2016-04-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0143_EN.html title: A8-0143/2016
summary
events/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2016-06-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0263_EN.html title: T8-0263/2016
summary
events/4
date
2016-06-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0263_EN.html title: T8-0263/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar date: 2015-06-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2015-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0143&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0143_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0263
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0263_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2015-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2015-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
activities
  • date: 2016-04-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BETTINI Goffredo Maria group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: KYUCHYUK Ilhan group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar
  • date: 2016-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0143&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0143/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-06-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0263 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0263/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
2015-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: BROK Elmar
docs
  • date: 2015-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.752 title: PE567.752 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.014 title: PE577.014 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2016-04-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0143&language=EN title: A8-0143/2016 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part. Members recalled that in terms of international and national human rights legislation, the Philippines are a role model for other countries in the region, having ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 2011. They also recalled that the EU is the Philippines' fourth largest trading partner and fourth largest export market, accounting for 11.56 % of all Philippine exports. Whilst welcoming the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation with the Philippines, Members called on the EU to continue providing financial support and capacity-building assistance to the Philippines for poverty alleviation and the implementation of policies to tackle climate change. At the same time, they called on the Philippines to foster further progress in the elimination of corruption and the promotion of human rights. Fight against terrorism : Members commended the Philippines for having been part of the international counterterrorism coalition since 200, but expressed concern over the continued reports of severe human rights violations by the Philippine military in the conduct of counter-insurgency measures. They pointed out that the Abu Sayyaf group is accused of carrying out the worst acts of terrorism committed in the Philippines, including deadly bombings such as the attack on a ferry in Manila in 2004 in which more than 100 people were killed. They also stressed that there are growing concerns that ISIS will win over affiliated groups in South-East Asia. At the same time, they condemned the massacre of 24 December 2015 of Christian farmers by separatist rebels in Mindanao. Human trafficking : the committee called on the EU and its Member States to support the government, and notably the Inter-Agency Council against Trafficking (IACAT), in the efforts being made to enhance assistance and support for victims, to put into place efficient law enforcement measures, and improve the legal avenues of work labour migration. The EU and its Member States were asked to engage with the Philippines and provide support for the government's capacity- building. South China Sea: Members noted that the Philippines are strategically located in the proximity of major international shipping and air traffic routes in the South China Sea. They recalled their serious concerns over the tension in the South China Sea . Members were particularly concerned at the massive scale of China’s current activities in the area, including building military facilities, ports, and at least one airstrip. They urged all parties in the disputed area to refrain from unilateral and provocative actions and to resolve the disputes peacefully. Members supported all steps that will enable the South China Sea to become a ‘sea of peace and cooperation ‘and all endeavours to ensure that the parties agree on a code of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question. GSP+: the committee called on the Philippines, as one of the countries having been granted GSP+ status by the EU, to ensure effective implementation of all the core international conventions relating to human and labour rights, the environment and good governance. Recognising that the Philippines have strengthened their human rights legislation, Members recalled that under the GSP+ beneficiaries will have to prove that they are implementing their obligations concerning human rights, labour, environmental and governance standards. They took note of the GSP+ country assessment of the Philippines, particularly as regards the ratification of all seven UN human rights conventions relevant to the EU's GSP+. However, they highlighted the work that still needs to be done for implementation. Free Trade Agreement : Members welcomed the agreement of 22 December 2015 to open negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the Philippines, and recalled, at the same time, that the Commission and the Philippine authorities should ensure high standards on human rights, labour and the environment. Such an FTA should serve as a building block towards a region-to-region EU-ASEAN agreement on trade and investment. Filipino seamen : Members took note that 800 000 Filipinos are living in the EU and that Filipino seamen working on EU-registered ships send remittances to the Philippines amounting to EUR 3 billion per annum. They recalled that the majority of the crew on many non-Community flagged vessels calling at European ports are Filipino and noted as well the harsh and inhuman working conditions in which many of these seafarers live. They called on Member States not to allow these vessels to be received in European ports when the working conditions on board contravene the labour rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Lastly, they wanted non-Community flagged vessels to guarantee their crews’ working conditions in accordance with international legislation and the rules laid down by the ILO and the International Maritime Organisation.
  • date: 2016-06-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27124&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0263 title: T8-0263/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 556 votes to 62 with 59 abstentions , a non legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part. Parliament recalled that in terms of national human rights legislation, the Philippines are a role model for other countries in the region, having ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 2011. It also recalled that the EU is the Philippines' fourth largest trading partner and fourth largest export market, accounting for 11.56 % of all Philippine exports. Whilst welcoming the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation with the Philippines, Parliament called on the EU to continue providing financial support and capacity-building assistance to the Philippines for poverty alleviation and the implementation of policies to tackle climate change. At the same time, it called on the Philippines to foster further progress in the elimination of corruption and the promotion of human rights. Fight against terrorism : Parliament commended the Philippines for having been part of the international counterterrorism coalition since 2001, but expressed concern over the continued reports of severe human rights violations by the Philippine military in the conduct of counter-insurgency measures. It pointed out that the Abu Sayyaf group is accused of carrying out the worst acts of terrorism committed in the Philippines, including deadly bombings such as the attack on a ferry in Manila in 2004 in which more than 100 people were killed. It also stressed that there are growing concerns that ISIS will win over affiliated groups in South-East Asia. At the same time, it condemned the massacre of 24 December 2015 of Christian farmers by separatist rebels in Mindanao. Parliament appreciated the commitments made by the Philippine Government to achieve a peace process for Mindanao but deeply regretted the fact that the Mindanao Peace Agreement was not adopted by the Philippine Congress. It also welcomed the initiative by the Philippine NGO PeaceTech of putting Christian and Muslim schoolchildren in touch with each other via Skype in an effort to foster contact between the two communities. Members called for the EU and its Member States to engage with the Philippines in order to exchange intelligence, cooperate and provide support for the government’s capacity- building in the international fight against terrorism and extremism in relation to fundamental rights and the rule of law. Human trafficking : Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to support the government, and notably the Inter-Agency Council against Trafficking (IACAT), in the efforts being made to enhance assistance and support for victims, to put into place efficient law enforcement measures, and improve the legal avenues of work labour migration. The EU and its Member States were asked to engage with the Philippines and provide support for the government's capacity- building. South China Sea: Parliament noted that the Philippines are strategically located in the proximity of major international shipping and air traffic routes in the South China Sea. They recalled their serious concerns over the tension in the South China Sea . Members were particularly concerned at the massive scale of China’s current activities in the area, including building military facilities, ports, and at least one airstrip. They urged all parties in the disputed area to refrain from unilateral and provocative actions and to resolve the disputes peacefully. Members supported all steps that will enable the South China Sea to become a ‘sea of peace and cooperation ‘and all endeavours to ensure that the parties agree on a code of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question. GSP+: Parliament called on the Philippines, as one of the countries having been granted GSP+ status by the EU, to ensure effective implementation of all the core international conventions relating to human and labour rights, the environment and good governance. Recognising that the Philippines have strengthened their human rights legislation, Members recalled that under the GSP+ beneficiaries will have to prove that they are implementing their obligations concerning human rights, labour, environmental and governance standards. Parliament took note of the GSP+ country assessment of the Philippines, particularly as regards the ratification of all seven UN human rights conventions relevant to the EU's GSP+. However, it highlighted the work that still needs to be done for implementation. Free Trade Agreement : Parliament welcomed the agreement of 22 December 2015 to open negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the Philippines, and recalled, at the same time, that the Commission and the Philippine authorities should ensure high standards on human rights, labour and the environment. Such an FTA should serve as a building block towards a region-to-region EU-ASEAN agreement on trade and investment. It encouraged the Philippines to continue improving the investment climate, including the FDI environment, by increasing transparency and good governance and implementing the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Filipino seamen : Parliament took note that 800 000 Filipinos are living in the EU and that Filipino seamen working on EU-registered ships send remittances to the Philippines amounting to EUR 3 billion per annum. It recalled that the majority of the crew on many non-Community flagged vessels calling at European ports are Filipino and noted as well the harsh and inhuman working conditions in which many of these seafarers live. It called on Member States not to allow these vessels to be received in European ports when the working conditions on board contravene the labour rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It wanted non-Community flagged vessels to guarantee their crews’ working conditions in accordance with international legislation and the rules laid down by the ILO and the International Maritime Organisation. Follow-up and transparency: lastly, Parliament called for regular exchanges between the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Parliament, to allow Parliament to follow up on the implementation of the Framework Agreement and the achievement of its objectives.
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/8/04406
New
  • AFET/8/04406
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 105-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p1
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
  • 6.40.08 Relations with Asian countries
New
6.20.03
Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
6.40.08
Relations with Asian countries
procedure/summary
  • See also
procedure/type
Old
INI - Own-initiative procedure
New
  • INI - Own-initiative procedure
  • See also 2013/0441(NLE)
activities/2
date
2016-06-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0263 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0263/2016
activities/3/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2
date
2016-06-07T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/1/docs/0/text
  • he Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part.

    Members recalled that in terms of international and national human rights legislation, the Philippines are a role model for other countries in the region, having ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 2011. They also recalled that the EU is the Philippines' fourth largest trading partner and fourth largest export market, accounting for 11.56 % of all Philippine exports.

    Whilst welcoming the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation with the Philippines, Members called on the EU to continue providing financial support and capacity-building assistance to the Philippines for poverty alleviation and the implementation of policies to tackle climate change.

    At the same time, they called on the Philippines to foster further progress in the elimination of corruption and the promotion of human rights.

    Fight against terrorism: Members commended the Philippines for having been part of the international counterterrorism coalition since 200, but expressed concern over the continued reports of severe human rights violations by the Philippine military in the conduct of counter-insurgency measures. They pointed out that the Abu Sayyaf group is accused of carrying out the worst acts of terrorism committed in the Philippines, including deadly bombings such as the attack on a ferry in Manila in 2004 in which more than 100 people were killed.

    They also stressed that there are growing concerns that ISIS will win over affiliated groups in South-East Asia. At the same time, they condemned the massacre of 24 December 2015 of Christian farmers by separatist rebels in Mindanao.

    Human trafficking: the committee called on the EU and its Member States to support the government, and notably the Inter-Agency Council against Trafficking (IACAT), in the efforts being made to enhance assistance and support for victims, to put into place efficient law enforcement measures, and improve the legal avenues of work labour migration. The EU and its Member States were asked to engage with the Philippines and provide support for the government's capacity- building.

    South China Sea: Members noted that the Philippines are strategically located in the proximity of major international shipping and air traffic routes in the South China Sea. They recalled their serious concerns over the tension in the South China Sea. Members were particularly concerned at the massive scale of China’s current activities in the area, including building military facilities, ports, and at least one airstrip. They urged all parties in the disputed area to refrain from unilateral and provocative actions and to resolve the disputes peacefully. Members supported all steps that will enable the South China Sea to become a ‘sea of peace and cooperation ‘and all endeavours to ensure that the parties agree on a code of conduct for the peaceful exploitation of the maritime areas in question.

    GSP+: the committee called on the Philippines, as one of the countries having been granted GSP+ status by the EU, to ensure effective implementation of all the core international conventions relating to human and labour rights, the environment and good governance. Recognising that the Philippines have strengthened their human rights legislation, Members recalled that under the GSP+ beneficiaries will have to prove that they are implementing their obligations concerning human rights, labour, environmental and governance standards. They took note of the GSP+ country assessment of the Philippines, particularly as regards the ratification of all seven UN human rights conventions relevant to the EU's GSP+. However, they highlighted the work that still needs to be done for implementation.

    Free Trade Agreement: Members welcomed the agreement of 22 December 2015 to open negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the Philippines, and recalled, at the same time, that the Commission and the Philippine authorities should ensure high standards on human rights, labour and the environment. Such an FTA should serve as a building block towards a region-to-region EU-ASEAN agreement on trade and investment.

    Filipino seamen: Members took note that 800 000 Filipinos are living in the EU and that Filipino seamen working on EU-registered ships send remittances to the Philippines amounting to EUR 3 billion per annum. They recalled that the majority of the crew on many non-Community flagged vessels calling at European ports are Filipino and noted as well the harsh and inhuman working conditions in which many of these seafarers live. They called on Member States not to allow these vessels to be received in European ports when the working conditions on board contravene the labour rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Lastly, they wanted non-Community flagged vessels to guarantee their crews’ working conditions in accordance with international legislation and the rules laid down by the ILO and the International Maritime Organisation.

activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2016-06-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0143&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0143/2016
activities/1
date
2016-04-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0
date
2016-04-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BETTINI Goffredo Maria group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: KYUCHYUK Ilhan group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
53b2d77ab819f205b000001c
New
53b2d788b819f205b000001e
committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
BENIFEI Brando
New
BETTINI Goffredo Maria
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
TANNOCK Charles
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
KYUCHYUK Ilhan
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
HADJIGEORGIOU Takis
committees/0/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
activities/0/date
Old
2016-05-10T00:00:00
New
2016-06-07T00:00:00
activities/0/date
Old
2016-03-09T00:00:00
New
2016-05-10T00:00:00
activities/0/date
Old
2016-01-18T00:00:00
New
2016-03-09T00:00:00
activities
  • date: 2016-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/8/04406
geographical_area
Philippines
reference
2015/2234(INI)
title
EU/Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p1
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
summary
See also
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject