Next event: Commission response to text adopted in plenary 2017/02/17 more...
- Results of vote in Parliament 2016/10/25
- Debate in Parliament 2016/10/25
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2016/10/25
- End of procedure in Parliament 2016/10/25
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2016/10/10
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2016/10/03
- Amendments tabled in committee 2016/06/24
- Amendments tabled in committee 2016/06/21
- Committee opinion 2016/06/16
Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | IN 'T VELD Sophia ( ALDE) | ENGEL Frank ( PPE), BEŇOVÁ Monika ( S&D), KIRKHOPE Timothy ( ECR), SPINELLI Barbara ( GUE/NGL), LUNACEK Ulrike ( Verts/ALE), FERRARA Laura ( EFDD), LEBRETON Gilles ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | SCHÖPFLIN György ( PPE) | Josep-Maria TERRICABRAS ( Verts/ALE), Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47
Legal Basis:
RoP 47Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 405 votes to 171, with 39 abstentions, a resolution containing recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights.
Members recalled that there are several instruments for addressing the risk of a serious breach of Union values but clear and objective benchmarks need to be developed for those instruments to be sufficiently strong and dissuasive to prevent infringements of the rule of law and fundamental rights.
However, the Union has no legally binding mechanism in place to monitor regularly compliance of the Member States and Union institutions with the Union values and fundamental rights.
Conclude an EU Pact for DRF : Parliament requested that the Commission submit, by September 2017, on the basis of Article 295 TFEU, a proposal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (EU Pact for DRF) in the form of an interinstitutional agreement .
The EU Pact for DRF should: (i) be evidence based; (ii) be objective and not subject to outside influence , in particular political influence, non-discriminatory and assessing on an equal footing; (iii) respect the principle of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality; (iv) address both Member States and institutions of the Union; and (v) be based on a graduated approach , including both a preventative and corrective arm .
The Pact for DRF must include all relevant actors and consist of:
an annual report on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (European DRF Report) with country-specific recommendations incorporating the reporting done by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), the Council of Europe, and other relevant authorities in the field; an annual inter-parliamentary debate on the basis of the European DRF Report, arrangements for remedying possible risks and breaches, as provided for by the Treaties, including the activation of the preventative or corrective arms of Article 7 TEU, a DRF Policy Cycle within the Union institutions.
The European DRF Report shall be drawn up by the Commission, in consultation with the panel of independent experts (DRF Expert Panel) composed one independent expert designated by the parliament of each Member State and ten further experts designated by the European Parliament.
The Commission shall transmit the European DRF Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the national parliaments. The Report shall be made available to the public.
Recommendations : Members emphasised the key role that the European Parliament and the national parliaments should play in measuring the progress of, and monitoring the compliance with, the shared values of the Union, as enshrined in Article 2 TEU. Any inter-parliamentary debate should include civil society .
Parliament invited the Commission to:
present, by June 2017, a new draft agreement for the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR); take measures to ensure general access to legal assistance to individuals and organisations litigating cases relating to violations of DRF by national governments or the Union institutions; partner with civil society to develop an awareness raising campaign , to enable Union citizens and residents to take full ownership of their rights deriving from the Treaties and from the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
DRF Expert Panel : Members recommended that the Panel undertake an assessment of access to justice at Union level, including aspects such as: (i) impartiality of courts and judges; (ii) duration and cost of litigation; (iii) adequacy and effectiveness of the legal aid system; (iv) implementation of court rulings; (v) redress available to citizens, and options for cross-border collective redress.
Revision of future treaties : Members considered that if in the future Treaty revision would be considered, the following changes may be provided for:
providing for Article 2 TEU and the Charter to become a legal basis for legislative measures to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure ; enabling national courts under Article 2 TEU and the Charter to bring before the Court of Justice proceedings relating to the legality of Member States' actions; reviewing Article 7 TEU in order to provide for relevant and applicable sanctions against any Member State, identifying the rights of Member States at fault (in addition to Council voting rights) that may be suspended, for example financial sanctions or the suspension of Union funding; making it possible for Union legislation, after its adoption and before its implementation, to be referred to the Court of Justice by one-third of the Members of Parliament ; enabling natural and legal persons who are directly and individually affected by an action to bring actions before the Court of Justice for alleged violations of the Charter either by the Union institutions or by a Member State, by amending Articles 258 and 259 TFEU; reviewing the unanimity requirement in areas relating to respect for and protection and promotion of fundamental rights, such as equality and non-discrimination.
Endowment : Members called for the setting up of an endowment for democracy grant-giving organisation that supports local actors promoting democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights within the Union.
They recommended, furthermore, that the EU Pact for DRF include the regular monitoring of the compatibility of the international agreements ratified by the Member States and the Union with Union primary and secondary law.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Sophia in 't VELD (ADLE, NL) containing recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (Initiative – Rule 46 of the Rules of Procedure).
Members recalled that the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, enshrined in its core principles and objectives in the first articles of the TEU, and in the criteria for Union membership.
Accordingly, the committee considered that the Union institutions and bodies and the Member States should set an example by genuinely fulfilling their obligations and move towards a shared culture of the rule of law as universal value in the 28 Member States and in the Union institutions to be applied by all concerned even-handedly.
Conclude an EU Pact for DRF : Members requested that the Commission submit, by September 2017, on the basis of Article 295 TFEU, a proposal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (EU Pact for DRF) in the form of an interinstitutional agreement.
The Pact for DRF must include all relevant actors and consist of:
an annual report on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (European DRF Report) with country-specific recommendations incorporating the reporting done by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), the Council of Europe, and other relevant authorities in the field; an annual inter-parliamentary debate on the basis of the European DRF Report, arrangements for remedying possible risks and breaches, as provided for by the Treaties, including the activation of the preventative or corrective arms of Article 7 TEU, a DRF Policy Cycle within the Union institutions.
The European DRF Report shall be drawn up by the Commission, in consultation with the panel of independent experts (DRF Expert Panel) composed one independent expert designated by the parliament of each Member State and ten further experts designated by the European Parliament.
The Commission shall transmit the European DRF Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the national parliaments. The Report shall be made available to the public.
Recommendations : Members recommended, in particular, that the EU Pact for DRF include preventative and corrective elements , and address all Member States equally as well as the three main Union institutions, while respecting the principles of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality. While the main purpose of the EU Pact for DRF would be to prevent and correct breaches of Union values, it should also contain possible sanctions that can act as effective deterrence.
The Commission was called upon to bundle, from 2018 onwards, its relevant annual thematic reports as well as the outcome of existing monitoring mechanisms and periodic assessment tools, to be presented all on the same day feeding into the DRF Policy Cycle.
Members emphasised the key role that the European Parliament and the national parliaments should play in measuring the progress of, and monitoring the compliance with, the shared values of the Union, as enshrined in Article 2 TEU. Any inter-parliamentary debate should include civil society.
Members invited the Commission to:
present, by June 2017, a new draft agreement for the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR); take measures to ensure general access to legal assistance to individuals and organisations litigating cases relating to violations of DRF by national governments or the Union institutions; partner with civil society to develop an awareness raising campaign , to enable Union citizens and residents to take full ownership of their rights deriving from the Treaties and from the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
For his part, the European Ombudsman should highlight within a dedicated chapter, as part of its annual report, cases, recommendations and decisions related to citizens’ fundamental rights, as well as the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
DRF Expert Panel : Members recommended that the Panel undertake an assessment of access to justice at Union level, including aspects such as:
independence and impartiality of courts and judges, duration and cost of litigation, adequacy and effectiveness of the legal aid system, implementation of court rulings, scope of judicial control and redress available to citizens, and options for cross border collective redress.
Endowment : Members called for the setting up of an endowment for democracy grant-giving organisation that supports local actors promoting democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights within the Union.
They recommended, furthermore, that the EU Pact for DRF include the regular monitoring of the compatibility of the international agreements ratified by the Member States and the Union with Union primary and secondary law.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)16
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T8-0409/2016
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0283/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE585.458
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE583.901
- Committee opinion: PE578.528
- Committee draft report: PE576.988
- Committee draft report: PE576.988
- Committee opinion: PE578.528
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE583.901
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE585.458
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)16
Activities
- Tim AKER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Johannes Cornelis van BAALEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Joëlle BERGERON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Michał BONI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (0)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andi CRISTEA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pál CSÁKY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Angélique DELAHAYE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Frank ENGEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Norbert ERDŐS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Enrico GASBARRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sylvie GODDYN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Filiz HYUSMENOVA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Robert Jarosław IWASZKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Benedek JÁVOR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dennis de JONG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Josu JUARISTI ABAUNZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jeppe KOFOD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Barbara KUDRYCKA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alexander Graf LAMBSDORFF
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Constance LE GRIP
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Patrick LE HYARIC
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ulrike LUNACEK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Louis-Joseph MANSCOUR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Anne-Marie MINEUR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bernard MONOT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alessia Maria MOSCA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- József NAGY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Momchil NEKOV
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Péter NIEDERMÜLLER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Cora van NIEUWENHUIZEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jens NILSSON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Margot PARKER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Soraya POST
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Julia REID
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sofia RIBEIRO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Virginie ROZIÈRE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- György SCHÖPFLIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Barbara SPINELLI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Helga STEVENS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eleni THEOCHAROUS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- László TŐKÉS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ulrike TREBESIUS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ángela VALLINA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Daniele VIOTTI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Udo VOIGT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lieve WIERINCK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Cecilia WIKSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
81 |
2015/2254(INL)
2016/04/05
AFCO
81 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph - 1 (new) - 1. Underlines the shared values as laid down in Article 2 TEU on which the European Union is founded;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Expresses the view that respecting the rule of law is a prerequisite for the protection of fundamental rights and is of particular importance within the EU since it is also a prerequisite for upholding all rights and obligations deriving from the Treaties and from international law;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that the conclusions and opinions of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights as well as the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union constitute a good basis for the interpretation of Article 2 TFEU and the scope of the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that Article 6(2) TEU commits the European Union to acceding to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and therefore calls for this to happen;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that recent events in some Member States have shown that the failure to observe the rule of law and fundamental values is not being properly prevented, given the resulting problems among Member States and the fact that there is no swift, effective response coming from the European institutions;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points to the importance of continuing to promote and strengthen the protection and full development of core Union values and the requirements of democracy and compliance with the rule of law in accordance with the Treaties and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 2. Considers that the
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 2. Considers that the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 2. Considers that the procedure under Article 7 TEU is virtually unusable because of the difficulty to reach a decision with such high thresholds for voting and in a body where political considerations play a prominent role; notes that the Union has no legally binding mechanism in place to monitor regularly the compliance of the Member States and EU institutions with the EU's fundamental values; expresses the difficulty to launch the infringement proceedings when there is no link with secondary EU law;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 2. Considers that the procedure under Article 7 TEU
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 2. Considers that the procedure under Article 7 TEU
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 2 2. Considers that the procedure under Article 7 TEU is virtually unusable; notes that the Union has no legally binding mechanism in place to monitor regularly the compliance of the Member States and EU institutions with the EU's fundamental values, and therefore calls for amendments to be made to the Treaties to this end, where necessary;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the rule of law Framework established by the Commission in 2014
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the rule of law Framework established by the Commission in 20141 and of the creation of an annual dialogue on the rule of law in the General Affairs Council as established in December 2014; and looks to the formulation of a common
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the rule of law Framework
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls, therefore, for the adoption of an objective and evidence based mechanism that enables not only infringements to specific EU laws to be addressed, but also threats to democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights; ensuring that all Member States are treated equally and no decision will be taken (or perceived to be taken) on political grounds;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important to work towards a new consensus between the EU and its Member States with the aim of promoting democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important to work towards a new
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important to work towards a
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important to
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important to work towards a new consensus between the EU and its Member States with the aim of promoting democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important t
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 4. Considers it important to work towards a
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that the Separation of Powers Doctrine is the most important component of any modern democratic politic systems, since such an adherence to this crucial doctrine prevents abuses of power and furthermore it safeguards fundamental freedom for all;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Following the view already expressed by the European Parliament in its Resolution of 27 February 2014 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2012), considers it necessary to abolish article 51 of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union in order to enhance its field of application and make all the dispositions of the Charter directly applicable in the Member States;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1. Expresses the view that the
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that creating a new EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in an inappropriate form may lead to a situation in which small and medium-sized countries will feel dominated by larger, more powerful countries;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights the importance of protecting the fundamental right to private life for European citizens from all Member States;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Outlines the relevance of preventing discrimination concerning vulnerable minority groups in the Member States;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 5 5. Emphasises the key role that
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 5 5. Emphasises the key role that the European Parliament and the national parliaments should play in measuring the progress of, and monitoring the compliance with, the shared values of the European Union, as enshrined in Article 2 TEU; considers that the implementation of these values and principles must also be based on effective monitoring of respect for the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Charter, for example when legislative proposals are being drafted;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 5 5. Emphasises the key role that the European Parliament
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognizes the essential role civil society organisations play in promoting democratic values, the rule of law and fundamental rights;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that the European Parliament under Rule 135 of its Rules of Procedure has developed a scrutiny over third States in the case of breach of human rights, democracy and the rule of law; considers that on the basis of Articles 2, 6 and 7 TEU and Rule 135 of the Rules of Procedure, the European Parliament should take motions for resolutions on the respect for the rule of law, democratic values and the state of fundamental rights within the European Union and its Member States;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6. Recommends the establishment on an EU mechanism for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights which would include all relevant stakeholders; considers that
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1. Expresses the view that the Member States of the European Union should move, by consensus, towards a shared culture
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6. Recommends the establishment on an EU mechanism for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights which would include all relevant stakeholders
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6. Recommends, pending a possible amendment of the Treaties, the establishment o
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6. Recommends the establishment on a
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6. Recommends the establishment o
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that if the EU lays down requirements in its international agreements to protect and promote human rights, then it must likewise ensure that the institutions and all Member States comply with the rule of law and respect fundamental rights;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes that one of the fundamental values of the European Union is a culture of compromise and consensus, with the result that the existing integration process continues to develop; believes that introducing a new EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights may lead to a situation in which that culture of compromise and consensus is replaced by unbalanced and inadequate resources, exposing the EU institutions to accusations of bias;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Proposes to widen the mandate of the Fundamental Rights Agency to include the monitoring of fundamental rights and the rule of law in all Member States, both within and beyond the application of EU law;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers it necessary to go beyond these mechanisms as enshrined in Article 7 TEU and Article 258 TFEU in order to set-up a single, comprehensive and legally binding instrument addressing all the possible infringements of the rule of law and fundamental rights committed both by Institutions, formal and informal bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union, and the Member States and giving to the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council the same right to appeal in the European Court of Justice;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the establishment of an independent Copenhagen Commission that, in light of the assessment of the Fundamental Rights Agency, puts forward recommendations to enforce fundamental rights and the rule of law;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1. Expresses the view that the Member States of the European Union should set an example by genuinely fulfilling their obligations and move towards a shared culture of the meaning of the rule of law in the 28 Member States to be applied by all concerned even-handedly;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Warns that introducing a new EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights may generate rhetoric which is unhelpful to EU integration and leads to bigger, more powerful countries imposing themselves on small and medium-sized countries at the cost of their identity in terms of constitutional and political structures;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Warns that introducing a new EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights could disturb the fine line separating matters which remain the responsibility of the individual Member States;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Proposes to enable the Commission, on the basis of the findings of the reports drafted by the Fundamental Rights Agency and the recommendations of the Copenhagen Commission, to initiate infringement procedures under Article 2 TEU, and, if necessary, the procedure under Article 7 TEU;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 7 Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 7 7. Calls for a
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 7 7. Calls
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 7 7. Calls
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recommends to set-up, under article 352 of the TFEU, a politically independent body of experts in the field of fundamental rights acting, within the revised mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, as the monitoring body of the situation of human rights and the rule of law both in the Union as a whole and in its individual Member States;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 8 8. Recommends the conclusion of a pact between all EU institutions
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 8 8. Recommends the conclusion of a pact between all EU institutions and national parliaments in order to establish an annual 'fundamental rights policy cycle' as part of a multi-annual structured dialogue among all stakeholders with the aim of adapting the existing EU consensus on democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights to the changes of our society;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1. Expresses the view that the Member States of the European Union should without delay move towards a shared culture of the meaning of the rule of law in the 28 Member States to be applied by all concerned even-handedly;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Encourages Member States, bearing in mind also Resolution No 48/134 of the United Nations General Assembly of 20 December 1993, which also endorses the conclusions of the United Nations World Conference on human rights in Vienna of 1993, to set up, in accordance with domestic law, national bodies for the practical promotion, protection and monitoring of human rights, ensuring that their members are diverse and independent;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 9 9. Recommends
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 9 9. Recommends the organisation of an annual pan-EU parliamentary debate on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights as part of a multi- annual structured dialogue between the European Parliament
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 9 9. Recommends the organisation of an annual pan-EU parliamentary debate on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights as part of a multi- annual structured dialogue between the European Parliament and the national
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 10. Recommends that the pan-EU parliamentary debate is organised in such a way that it can involve setting goals to achieve and provide the means to measure changes from one year to another
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 10. Recommends that the pan-EU parliamentary debate is organised in such a way that it can involve setting goals to achieve and provide the means to measure changes from one year to another with the possibility to report back on the implementation of goals or recommendations.
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recommends that there needs to be a concerted focus on moving towards new sustainable development objectives under which human rights are universal, indivisible and inalienable;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recommends the organisation of an annual "European Justice Summit" focused on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, bringing together representatives of the European Parliament, the Commission, the Council, the Court of Justice, the European Court of human rights, the Council of Europe, the EU Agency for fundamental rights and of the national supreme courts, in order to promote a structured and permanent pan-European dialogue in this field;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1. Expresses the view that the Member States of the European Union should
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers it essential, for the purpose of following up the above parliamentary debate, to provide for the option of tabling an annual resolution in plenary;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Indent 2 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to address the concerns raised by the Court of Justice in its Opinion 2/13 as quickly as possible in order to comply with the obligation enshrined in Article 6 TEU to accede to the ECHR;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Indent 1 – paragraph 1 1. Expresses the view that the Member States of the European Union should move towards a shared culture of the meaning of the rule of law in the 28 Member States to be applied by all concerned even-handedly; stresses that the European Union's values, such as respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, are the key to the EU's credibility;
source: 580.532
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0283&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0283_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0409New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0409_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/04625New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 47
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-10-07T00:00:00New
2016-10-10T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-10-03T00:00:00New
2016-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/6 |
|
committees/2/shadows/6 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-09-12T00:00:00New
2016-10-03T00:00:00 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/2/shadows |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|