BETA


2015/2257(INI) Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in VET – a lifelong learning approach

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT MARAGALL Ernest (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) MORIN-CHARTIER Elisabeth (icon: PPE PPE), ŁYBACKA Krystyna (icon: S&D S&D), DZHAMBAZKI Angel (icon: ECR ECR), KYUCHYUK Ilhan (icon: ALDE ALDE), ADINOLFI Isabella (icon: EFDD EFDD), BILDE Dominique (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion EMPL CALVET CHAMBON Enrique (icon: ALDE ALDE) Laura AGEA (icon: EFDD EFDD), Patrick LE HYARIC (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Thomas MANN (icon: PPE PPE), Emilian PAVEL (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/09/20
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/04/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/04/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 577 votes to 37 with 90 abstentions, a resolution on Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in Vocational Education and Training (VET) – a lifelong learning approach.

Members recalled that according to Eurostat, unemployment in the EU remained as high as 10.2 % in 2014 despite there being a slow recovery. Across the EU youth unemployment currently stands at 22.1 %, while only 51 % of the 55-64 age group is in work and the gender gap in the employment rate for older workers stands at 13.6 percentage points.

Against this background, non-formal and informal learning and vocational training have an important contribution to make in tackling current challenges in lifelong learning, such as early school leaving, unacceptable numbers of young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs), and skills shortages and mismatches.

Taking stock of results and identifying key challenges: Members stated that education is a fundamental human right and a public good that should be equally accessible to all. They called on the EU and the Member States to address all socioeconomic limitations that prevent equal access for all to VET opportunities, including mobility.

The Commission, the Member States and key stakeholders to increase the visibility of VET programmes in order to remove cultural barriers and combat the phenomena of lack of motivation, lack of proactive predisposition and lack of language skills, particularly in those areas most affected by youth unemployment; believes that it must be ensured that these programmes are accessible to all citizens without discrimination; calls for the targeting of groups at risk of unemployment, such as people with disabilities.

Parliament insisted on the need to facilitate the implementation of mobility in Erasmus+ , by taking action to raise the success rate of applications, simplifying the design and use of electronic tools for mobility management, raising awareness of the value of mobility programmes in all general and vocational education establishments in the Union, and providing better-targeted information and training to beneficiaries and intermediaries of the programmes and actions.

The Commission was asked to create a “European student e-card” which would grant the status of EU student in a mobility context and offer access to services.

Raise awareness among SMEs: Parliament called on the Commission, the Member States and public employment bodies to publicise and raise awareness of the Erasmus+ programme and other tools aimed at promoting mobility in the area of VET, in particular among SMEs. It stressed the urgent need for industry and services in both private and public sectors, including the production sector (notably SMEs and micro-enterprises), to be consulted and/or involved in the design, framing, implementation and support of quality VET mobility programmes.

Members called for the recognition of the role of Skilled Craft Chambers and their training centres in supporting mobility and very small companies; all measures taken to improve VET schemes should also focus on domains promoting zero carbon energy and sustainable mobility.

European apprentice statute: Members recalled that, at present, only 1 % of young people in work-related training schemes, including apprentices, are involved in mobility schemes during their training. They pointed to the vital need to create the conditions for greater apprentice mobility within the EU, so as to give apprentices the same opportunities as higher education students. They, therefore, encouraged the definition by the EU of a statute of the ‘European Apprentice’. They also:

· called on the Commission to present, and on the Member States to endorse, a proposal for an EU apprenticeship scheme that would guarantee a set of rights for apprentices and VET learners;

· highlighted the positive role that “seniors” can play in the education and training of youth with a view to maximising intergenerational exchange;

· encouraged the adoption of concrete measures to ensure that apprenticeships and traineeships under Erasmus+ are not misused by being turned into an instrument for lowering the cost of labour.

Access: improving mobility options for young people in vocational training: Parliament encouraged the creation of a framework along the lines of the previous Leonardo da Vinci programme, to be referred to in the dedicated Erasmus+ calls, that identifies as clearly and precisely as possible the mobility options for young people in VET, especially through cross-platform campaigns launched by public authorities, with the coordinated participation of all stakeholders who play an active role in or have an influence on VET. It encouraged the Commission and the Member States to provide sufficient financial resources to support mobility programmes, taking into account potential financial barriers.

From mobility to employability: validation and recognition of learning outcomes, skills and competences: Members underlined that the opportunities offered by learning and training mobility, such as building international networks, may also have positive effects on employability, transnational cooperation and Europe’s competitiveness. They considered that the current and future measures to tackle skills mismatches should both facilitate the involvement of employers, businesses and local communities, and be better connected with forecasts concerning labour market developments and future skill needs.

The Commission was asked to keep track of demand and supply on the labour market within the EU, as well as of geographic and occupational mobility, in order to match the needs of the labour market.

Towards more efficient, accessible and inclusive mobility programmes: Parliament urged the Commission and Member States, also in collaboration with CEDEFOP, to define and strengthen the role of the intermediary institutions, both territorial and sectoral, involved in the preparation, management and follow-up of mobility. It stressed the need for such intermediary institutions to have adequate budgetary and human resources to enable mobility organisation and management structures to guarantee the involvement of the network of vocational training schools. They stressed the need for legal protection of minors abroad.

The Commission and Member States are called upon to establish and effectively implement a European network of workshops and incubators , as being crucial for encouraging knowledge alliances among schools, universities and businesses and promoting access to training, experience, refresher courses for teachers and lecturers, apprenticeships and start-ups.

Lastly, Parliament also called for the:

· setting-up of a one-stop-shop mechanism for pooling data and communication tools in order to provide a convenient and efficient service for those seeking information and support regarding the various mobility programmes existing at EU, national, regional and local level;

· provision of up-to-date statistics and to carry out assessments and/or studies regarding Erasmus+ and other VET mobility programmes;

· review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) , to be based on criteria including the prior assessment of the effectiveness of measures to combat unemployment, with funding for the less effective provisions being cut.

Documents
2016/04/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/04/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/03/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the report by Ernest MARAGALL (Greens/EFA, ES) on Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in VET – a lifelong learning approach.

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee under Article 54 of the Parliament’s internal Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on the report.

Members recalled that according to Eurostat, unemployment in the EU remained as high as 10.2 % in 2014 despite there being a slow recovery. Across the EU youth unemployment currently stands at 22.1 %, while only 51 % of the 55-64 age group is in work and the gender gap in the employment rate for older workers stands at 13.6 percentage points.

Against this background, non-formal and informal learning and vocational training have an important contribution to make in tackling current challenges in lifelong learning, such as early school leaving, unacceptable numbers of young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs), and skills shortages and mismatches.

Taking stock of results and identifying key challenges : Members stated that education is a fundamental human right and a public good that should be equally accessible to all. They called on the EU and the Member States to address all socioeconomic limitations that prevent equal access for all to VET opportunities, including mobility.

The Commission, the Member States and key stakeholders to increase the visibility of VET programmes in order to remove cultural barriers and combat the phenomena of lack of motivation, lack of proactive predisposition and lack of language skills, particularly in those areas most affected by youth unemployment; believes that it must be ensured that these programmes are accessible to all citizens without discrimination; calls for the targeting of groups at risk of unemployment, such as people with disabilities.

The report insisted on the need to facilitate the implementation of mobility in Erasmus+, by taking action to raise the success rate of applications, simplifying the design and use of electronic tools for mobility management, raising awareness of the value of mobility programmes in all general and vocational education establishments in the Union, and providing better-targeted information and training to beneficiaries and intermediaries of the programmes and actions. Efforts are called for to put in place schemes aimed at reducing linguistic and cultural barriers to the organisation of mobility programmes.

Raise awareness among SMEs : Members called on the Commission, the Member States and public employment bodies to publicise and raise awareness of the Erasmus+ programme and other tools aimed at promoting mobility in the area of VET, in particular among SMEs. They stressed the urgent need for industry and services in both private and public sectors, including the production sector (notably SMEs and micro-enterprises), to be consulted and/or involved in the design, framing, implementation and support of quality VET mobility programmes.

European apprentice statute : Members recalled that, at present, only 1 % of young people in work-related training schemes, including apprentices, are involved in mobility schemes during their training. They pointed to the vital need to create the conditions for greater apprentice mobility within the EU, so as to give apprentices the same opportunities as higher education students. They, therefore, encouraged the definition by the EU of a statute of the ‘European Apprentice’. They also called on the Commission to present, and on the Member States to endorse, a proposal for an EU apprenticeship scheme that would guarantee a set of rights for apprentices and VET learners.

Access : improving mobility options for young people in vocational training : Members encouraged the creation of a framework along the lines of the previous Leonardo da Vinci programme, to be referred to in the dedicated Erasmus+ calls, that identifies as clearly and precisely as possible the mobility options for young people in VET, especially through cross-platform campaigns launched by public authorities, with the coordinated participation of all stakeholders who play an active role in or have an influence on VET. They encouraged the Commission and the Member States to provide sufficient financial resources to support mobility programmes, taking into account potential financial barriers.

From mobility to employability: validation and recognition of learning outcomes, skills and competences : Members underlined that the opportunities offered by learning and training mobility, such as building international networks, may also have positive effects on employability, transnational cooperation and Europe’s competitiveness. They considered that the current and future measures to tackle skills mismatches should both facilitate the involvement of employers, businesses and local communities, and be better connected with forecasts concerning labour market developments and future skill needs.

Towards more efficient, accessible and inclusive mobility programmes : Members urged the Commission and the Member States, also in collaboration with CEDEFOP, to define and strengthen the role of the intermediary institutions, both territorial and sectoral, involved in the preparation, management and follow-up of mobility. They stressed the need for such intermediary institutions to have adequate budgetary and human resources to enable mobility organisation and management structures to guarantee the involvement of the network of vocational training schools. They stressed the need for legal protection of minors abroad .

The Commission and the Member States are called upon to establish and effectively implement a European network of workshops and incubators, as being crucial for encouraging knowledge alliances among schools, universities and businesses and promoting access to training, experience, refresher courses for teachers and lecturers, apprenticeships and start-ups.

Lastly, Members also called for the:

setting-up of a one-stop-shop mechanism for pooling data and communication tools in order to provide a convenient and efficient service for those seeking information and support regarding the various mobility programmes existing at EU, national, regional and local level; provision of up-to-date statistics and to carry out assessments and/or studies regarding Erasmus+ and other VET mobility programmes; review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF), to be based on criteria including the prior assessment of the effectiveness of measures to combat unemployment, with funding for the less effective provisions being cut.

Documents
2016/02/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/01/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/12/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/11/17
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/10/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/10/29
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2015/09/16
   EP - CALVET CHAMBON Enrique (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2015/05/04
   EP - MARAGALL Ernest (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 2 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 408, -: 255, 0: 36
GB IT ES SE BE DE NL FI DK IE PT RO MT CZ LU LV CY LT EE BG AT EL HR SI SK HU FR PL
Total
64
64
49
19
20
92
25
13
12
10
21
29
5
19
6
7
6
10
5
16
17
19
11
8
12
20
69
50
icon: S&D S&D
179

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: NI NI
15

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

Poland ENF

2
icon: PPE PPE
204

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 4 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 636, -: 49, 0: 19
DE IT ES PL GB RO FR PT SE CZ BE BG HU AT NL FI EL SK HR LT IE DK LV SI LU CY EE MT
Total
92
65
49
50
63
29
70
21
19
20
20
16
20
17
26
12
20
13
11
10
10
12
8
8
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
204

Finland PPE

2
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

3

Hungary NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - Am 1 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: -: 515, +: 183, 0: 5
IE ES LV SE CY LU MT EE SI BE DK FI FR AT EL LT HR HU PT CZ SK NL BG RO IT GB DE PL
Total
10
47
8
19
6
6
5
5
8
20
12
13
70
17
20
10
11
19
21
20
13
26
16
30
64
64
92
50
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: NI NI
15

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

2

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
4

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
204

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 20/2 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 574, -: 92, 0: 38
DE IT ES FR RO PT HU PL EL AT CZ SE BG BE IE HR FI LT SI SK LU LV EE MT NL DK CY GB
Total
92
64
49
70
30
21
20
50
20
17
20
18
16
20
10
11
13
10
8
13
6
8
5
5
26
12
6
63
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 27 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 584, -: 102, 0: 18
DE FR IT ES RO HU AT CZ BE PT BG EL IE SE HR LT FI SI SK LU LV CY NL EE MT PL DK GB
Total
91
69
65
49
30
20
17
20
19
21
16
20
10
19
11
10
13
8
13
6
8
6
26
5
5
50
12
64
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

6

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47
2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 60/1 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 661, -: 32, 0: 12
DE FR IT ES PL RO GB BE HU PT CZ AT BG NL SE FI SK DK HR EL LT IE LV SI LU CY EE MT
Total
92
70
65
49
50
30
63
20
20
21
19
17
16
26
19
13
13
12
11
20
10
10
8
8
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
204

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 60/2 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 378, -: 293, 0: 27
IT ES DE SE FR EL PT BE FI LT RO EE MT LU IE DK CY CZ AT BG HU HR LV SI NL SK GB PL
Total
64
46
91
19
70
20
21
20
13
10
29
5
5
6
10
12
6
19
17
16
20
11
8
8
25
13
63
50
icon: S&D S&D
176

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: NI NI
15

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
203

Sweden PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 62 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 559, -: 101, 0: 45
DE ES IT RO FR PL HU BE PT AT CZ BG SE EL SK IE LT HR FI SI DK LU LV EE MT NL CY GB
Total
92
49
64
30
70
50
20
20
21
17
20
16
18
20
13
10
10
11
13
8
12
6
8
5
5
26
6
64
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - § 65 #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 625, 0: 48, -: 31
DE FR IT PL ES RO GB BE HU PT CZ NL BG SE AT FI SK DK HR LT LV SI LU IE EL EE MT CY
Total
92
70
65
50
49
30
62
20
20
21
20
26
15
19
17
13
13
12
11
10
8
8
6
10
20
5
5
6
icon: PPE PPE
204

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

For (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall - Résolution #

2016/04/12 Outcome: +: 577, 0: 90, -: 37
DE FR ES IT RO PL BE HU PT AT CZ BG SE GB FI EL IE HR LT NL SK DK SI LU LV CY EE MT
Total
91
70
49
65
30
49
20
20
21
17
20
16
19
63
13
20
10
11
10
26
13
12
8
6
8
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
204
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
384 2015/2257(INI)
2015/12/01 EMPL 148 amendments...
source: 571.689
2015/12/07 CULT 221 amendments...
source: 571.761
2016/01/07 EMPL 15 amendments...
source: 573.035

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-04-11-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/4
name
MALTESE Curzio
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.848
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-569848_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.761
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-571761_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.480&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-569480_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2016-03-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0049_EN.html title: A8-0049/2016
summary
events/3
date
2016-03-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0049_EN.html title: A8-0049/2016
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160411&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2016-04-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0107_EN.html title: T8-0107/2016
summary
events/6
date
2016-04-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0107_EN.html title: T8-0107/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: MARAGALL Ernest date: 2015-05-04T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2015-05-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARAGALL Ernest group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: CALVET CHAMBON Enrique date: 2015-09-16T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-09-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CALVET CHAMBON Enrique group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/3/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0049&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0049_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0107
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0107_EN.html
commission
  • body: EC dg: Education, Youth, Sport and Culture commissioner: NAVRACSICS Tibor
committees
  • type: Responsible Committee body: EP associated: True committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT date: 2015-05-04T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: MARAGALL Ernest group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE shadows: name: MORIN-CHARTIER Elisabeth group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE name: ŁYBACKA Krystyna group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR name: KYUCHYUK Ilhan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE name: MALTESE Curzio group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL name: ADINOLFI Isabella group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD name: BILDE Dominique group: Europe of Nations and Freedom abbr: ENF
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: True committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL date: 2015-09-16T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: CALVET CHAMBON Enrique group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs
  • date: 2015-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.848 title: PE569.848 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-12-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.761 title: PE571.761 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-01-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.480&secondRef=02 title: PE569.480 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-20T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26894&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)484 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-04T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0049&language=EN title: A8-0049/2016 summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the report by Ernest MARAGALL (Greens/EFA, ES) on Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in VET – a lifelong learning approach. The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee under Article 54 of the Parliament’s internal Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on the report. Members recalled that according to Eurostat, unemployment in the EU remained as high as 10.2 % in 2014 despite there being a slow recovery. Across the EU youth unemployment currently stands at 22.1 %, while only 51 % of the 55-64 age group is in work and the gender gap in the employment rate for older workers stands at 13.6 percentage points. Against this background, non-formal and informal learning and vocational training have an important contribution to make in tackling current challenges in lifelong learning, such as early school leaving, unacceptable numbers of young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs), and skills shortages and mismatches. Taking stock of results and identifying key challenges : Members stated that education is a fundamental human right and a public good that should be equally accessible to all. They called on the EU and the Member States to address all socioeconomic limitations that prevent equal access for all to VET opportunities, including mobility. The Commission, the Member States and key stakeholders to increase the visibility of VET programmes in order to remove cultural barriers and combat the phenomena of lack of motivation, lack of proactive predisposition and lack of language skills, particularly in those areas most affected by youth unemployment; believes that it must be ensured that these programmes are accessible to all citizens without discrimination; calls for the targeting of groups at risk of unemployment, such as people with disabilities. The report insisted on the need to facilitate the implementation of mobility in Erasmus+, by taking action to raise the success rate of applications, simplifying the design and use of electronic tools for mobility management, raising awareness of the value of mobility programmes in all general and vocational education establishments in the Union, and providing better-targeted information and training to beneficiaries and intermediaries of the programmes and actions. Efforts are called for to put in place schemes aimed at reducing linguistic and cultural barriers to the organisation of mobility programmes. Raise awareness among SMEs : Members called on the Commission, the Member States and public employment bodies to publicise and raise awareness of the Erasmus+ programme and other tools aimed at promoting mobility in the area of VET, in particular among SMEs. They stressed the urgent need for industry and services in both private and public sectors, including the production sector (notably SMEs and micro-enterprises), to be consulted and/or involved in the design, framing, implementation and support of quality VET mobility programmes. European apprentice statute : Members recalled that, at present, only 1 % of young people in work-related training schemes, including apprentices, are involved in mobility schemes during their training. They pointed to the vital need to create the conditions for greater apprentice mobility within the EU, so as to give apprentices the same opportunities as higher education students. They, therefore, encouraged the definition by the EU of a statute of the ‘European Apprentice’. They also called on the Commission to present, and on the Member States to endorse, a proposal for an EU apprenticeship scheme that would guarantee a set of rights for apprentices and VET learners. Access : improving mobility options for young people in vocational training : Members encouraged the creation of a framework along the lines of the previous Leonardo da Vinci programme, to be referred to in the dedicated Erasmus+ calls, that identifies as clearly and precisely as possible the mobility options for young people in VET, especially through cross-platform campaigns launched by public authorities, with the coordinated participation of all stakeholders who play an active role in or have an influence on VET. They encouraged the Commission and the Member States to provide sufficient financial resources to support mobility programmes, taking into account potential financial barriers. From mobility to employability: validation and recognition of learning outcomes, skills and competences : Members underlined that the opportunities offered by learning and training mobility, such as building international networks, may also have positive effects on employability, transnational cooperation and Europe’s competitiveness. They considered that the current and future measures to tackle skills mismatches should both facilitate the involvement of employers, businesses and local communities, and be better connected with forecasts concerning labour market developments and future skill needs. Towards more efficient, accessible and inclusive mobility programmes : Members urged the Commission and the Member States, also in collaboration with CEDEFOP, to define and strengthen the role of the intermediary institutions, both territorial and sectoral, involved in the preparation, management and follow-up of mobility. They stressed the need for such intermediary institutions to have adequate budgetary and human resources to enable mobility organisation and management structures to guarantee the involvement of the network of vocational training schools. They stressed the need for legal protection of minors abroad . The Commission and the Member States are called upon to establish and effectively implement a European network of workshops and incubators, as being crucial for encouraging knowledge alliances among schools, universities and businesses and promoting access to training, experience, refresher courses for teachers and lecturers, apprenticeships and start-ups. Lastly, Members also called for the: setting-up of a one-stop-shop mechanism for pooling data and communication tools in order to provide a convenient and efficient service for those seeking information and support regarding the various mobility programmes existing at EU, national, regional and local level; provision of up-to-date statistics and to carry out assessments and/or studies regarding Erasmus+ and other VET mobility programmes; review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF), to be based on criteria including the prior assessment of the effectiveness of measures to combat unemployment, with funding for the less effective provisions being cut.
  • date: 2016-04-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160411&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26894&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0107 title: T8-0107/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 577 votes to 37 with 90 abstentions, a resolution on Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in Vocational Education and Training (VET) – a lifelong learning approach. Members recalled that according to Eurostat, unemployment in the EU remained as high as 10.2 % in 2014 despite there being a slow recovery. Across the EU youth unemployment currently stands at 22.1 %, while only 51 % of the 55-64 age group is in work and the gender gap in the employment rate for older workers stands at 13.6 percentage points. Against this background, non-formal and informal learning and vocational training have an important contribution to make in tackling current challenges in lifelong learning, such as early school leaving, unacceptable numbers of young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs), and skills shortages and mismatches. Taking stock of results and identifying key challenges: Members stated that education is a fundamental human right and a public good that should be equally accessible to all. They called on the EU and the Member States to address all socioeconomic limitations that prevent equal access for all to VET opportunities, including mobility. The Commission, the Member States and key stakeholders to increase the visibility of VET programmes in order to remove cultural barriers and combat the phenomena of lack of motivation, lack of proactive predisposition and lack of language skills, particularly in those areas most affected by youth unemployment; believes that it must be ensured that these programmes are accessible to all citizens without discrimination; calls for the targeting of groups at risk of unemployment, such as people with disabilities. Parliament insisted on the need to facilitate the implementation of mobility in Erasmus+ , by taking action to raise the success rate of applications, simplifying the design and use of electronic tools for mobility management, raising awareness of the value of mobility programmes in all general and vocational education establishments in the Union, and providing better-targeted information and training to beneficiaries and intermediaries of the programmes and actions. The Commission was asked to create a “European student e-card” which would grant the status of EU student in a mobility context and offer access to services. Raise awareness among SMEs: Parliament called on the Commission, the Member States and public employment bodies to publicise and raise awareness of the Erasmus+ programme and other tools aimed at promoting mobility in the area of VET, in particular among SMEs. It stressed the urgent need for industry and services in both private and public sectors, including the production sector (notably SMEs and micro-enterprises), to be consulted and/or involved in the design, framing, implementation and support of quality VET mobility programmes. Members called for the recognition of the role of Skilled Craft Chambers and their training centres in supporting mobility and very small companies; all measures taken to improve VET schemes should also focus on domains promoting zero carbon energy and sustainable mobility. European apprentice statute: Members recalled that, at present, only 1 % of young people in work-related training schemes, including apprentices, are involved in mobility schemes during their training. They pointed to the vital need to create the conditions for greater apprentice mobility within the EU, so as to give apprentices the same opportunities as higher education students. They, therefore, encouraged the definition by the EU of a statute of the ‘European Apprentice’. They also: · called on the Commission to present, and on the Member States to endorse, a proposal for an EU apprenticeship scheme that would guarantee a set of rights for apprentices and VET learners; · highlighted the positive role that “seniors” can play in the education and training of youth with a view to maximising intergenerational exchange; · encouraged the adoption of concrete measures to ensure that apprenticeships and traineeships under Erasmus+ are not misused by being turned into an instrument for lowering the cost of labour. Access: improving mobility options for young people in vocational training: Parliament encouraged the creation of a framework along the lines of the previous Leonardo da Vinci programme, to be referred to in the dedicated Erasmus+ calls, that identifies as clearly and precisely as possible the mobility options for young people in VET, especially through cross-platform campaigns launched by public authorities, with the coordinated participation of all stakeholders who play an active role in or have an influence on VET. It encouraged the Commission and the Member States to provide sufficient financial resources to support mobility programmes, taking into account potential financial barriers. From mobility to employability: validation and recognition of learning outcomes, skills and competences: Members underlined that the opportunities offered by learning and training mobility, such as building international networks, may also have positive effects on employability, transnational cooperation and Europe’s competitiveness. They considered that the current and future measures to tackle skills mismatches should both facilitate the involvement of employers, businesses and local communities, and be better connected with forecasts concerning labour market developments and future skill needs. The Commission was asked to keep track of demand and supply on the labour market within the EU, as well as of geographic and occupational mobility, in order to match the needs of the labour market. Towards more efficient, accessible and inclusive mobility programmes: Parliament urged the Commission and Member States, also in collaboration with CEDEFOP, to define and strengthen the role of the intermediary institutions, both territorial and sectoral, involved in the preparation, management and follow-up of mobility. It stressed the need for such intermediary institutions to have adequate budgetary and human resources to enable mobility organisation and management structures to guarantee the involvement of the network of vocational training schools. They stressed the need for legal protection of minors abroad. The Commission and Member States are called upon to establish and effectively implement a European network of workshops and incubators , as being crucial for encouraging knowledge alliances among schools, universities and businesses and promoting access to training, experience, refresher courses for teachers and lecturers, apprenticeships and start-ups. Lastly, Parliament also called for the: · setting-up of a one-stop-shop mechanism for pooling data and communication tools in order to provide a convenient and efficient service for those seeking information and support regarding the various mobility programmes existing at EU, national, regional and local level; · provision of up-to-date statistics and to carry out assessments and/or studies regarding Erasmus+ and other VET mobility programmes; · review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) , to be based on criteria including the prior assessment of the effectiveness of measures to combat unemployment, with funding for the less effective provisions being cut.
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2015/2257(INI)
title
Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in VET – a lifelong learning approach
subject
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subtype
Initiative
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 54
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
stage_reached
Procedure completed
dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/8/04633